DOCSLIB.ORG

Allocation of Scarce Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Jewish Ethical Perspective Amy Solnica,1,2 Leonid Barski,3,4 Alan Jotkowitz3,4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Allocation of Scarce Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Jewish Ethical Perspective Amy Solnica,1,2 Leonid Barski,3,4 Alan Jotkowitz3,4 Current controversy J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2020-106242 on 10 April 2020. Downloaded from Allocation of scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective Amy Solnica,1,2 Leonid Barski,3,4 Alan Jotkowitz3,4 1Henrietta Szold School of ABSTRact transparency, consistency, proportionality and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The novel COVID-19 pandemic has placed medical accountability. During a time of disaster there is a Hebrew University, Jerusalem, triage decision- making in the spotlight. As life- saving paradigm shift from focusing on the individual to Israel 3 2Department of Obstetrics and ventilators become scarce, clinicians are being forced providing the best outcome for the population. In Gynecology, Hadassah- Hebrew to allocate scarce resources in even the wealthiest March 2020, the National Academy of Medicine, University Medical Center, countries. The pervasiveness of air travel and high rate formally known as the IOM, published a discussion Jerusalem, Israel of transmission has caused this pandemic to spread paper regarding planning of care during the time 3Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben- Gurion University of the Negev, swiftly throughout the world. Ethical triage decisions of a pandemic with specific focus on the current Beer Sheva, Israel are commonly based on the utilitarian approach of COVID-19 outbreak. The authors reiterate that the 4Department of Medicine, maximising total benefits and life expectancy. We present goal of CSC planning is to have processes in place Soroka University Medical triage guidelines from Italy, USA and the UK as well as before the crisis to manage the availability of crit- Center, Beer Sheva, Israel the Jewish ethical prospective on medical triage. The ical resources, thus avoiding the need to make diffi- Jewish tradition also recognises the utilitarian approach cult triage decisions. Part of the planning involves Correspondence to Amy Solnica, Henrietta Szold but there is disagreement between the rabbis whether ‘graceful degradation of services’ by making step- 4 School of Nursing, Faculty of human discretion has any role in the allocation of scarce down changes to care that is provided. Decision- Medicine, Hebrew University, resources and triage decision- making. making should be performed using the principal Jerusalem 91120, Israel; of proportionality, weighing the compromising of amysolnica@ gmail. com usual standards against optimisation of benefits Received 26 March 2020 INTRODUCTION to the greater society. For example, recycling life- Accepted 27 March 2020 The current worldwide pandemic of the novel saving respiratory equipment after careful sterili- COVID-19 virus is taxing the global healthcare sation, making home continuous positive airway system including vital life-saving medical supplies pressure machines, respiratory aide devices, avail- and equipment. Healthcare workers are faced able for hospital use, adjustment of standard criteria with an epic proportion of medical and ethical for intubation and weaning from ventilators. These decisions regarding allocation of these precious measures will provide greater availability of life- 4 resources, especially ventilators. This paper will saving equipment. focus primarily on the Jewish ethical prospective The American Medical Association Code of to the allocation of scarce resources during the Medical Ethics delineates that decision- making in COVID-19 pandemic. times of scarcity of equipment should be based on http://jme.bmj.com/ Physicians in Italy, the first European country three factors: ‘urgency of (medical) need, the like- plagued by the corona pandemic, were overwhelmed lihood and anticipated duration of benefit, and the with difficult triage dilemmas as around 10% of change in quality of life’.5 Opinion 11.1.3 further those effected with COVID-19 require some form calls on healthcare professionals and institutions to: of respiratory assistance.1 On 7 March 2020, the prioritise treatment to those for whom treatment Italian College of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscita- will prevent premature death or extremely poor tion and Intensive Care published new guidelines outcomes. Physicians should use ‘an objective, flex- on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. regarding the triage of patients due to underavail- ible, transparent mechanism to determine which ability of resources. ‘It is a scenario where criteria patients will receive recourse when there are not for access to intensive care and discharge may be substantial differences among patients and requires needed, not only in strictly clinical appropriateness that allocation policies be explained both to patients and proportionality of care, but also in distributive who are denied access to limited resources and to justice and appropriate allocation of limited health- the public’.5 care resources.’2 On 20 March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 Similar to the battlefield model of triage, privi- pandemic, the National Institute for Health and lege is given to those with the ‘greatest life expec- Care Excellence in the UK published the Guide- tancy’, thus abandoning the traditional ‘first come, line with clinical decision- making. This Guideline © Author(s) (or their provides a clear and detailed algorithm for the allo- employer(s)) 2020. No first served’ model. Unfortunately, due to the high commercial re- use. See rights number of patients needing respiratory support, cation of critical care beds and treatment of crit- and permissions. Published these decisions are occurring at greater frequency ical patients during the COVID-19 outbreak. The by BMJ. and at a faster pace. Factors such as age, comorbidi- basis of the Guideline is to maximise patient safety To cite: Solnica A, Barski L, ties and functional are evaluated in the decision for and appropriate use of resources. Admission to an 2 Jotkowitz A. J Med Ethics critical care admission. intensive care unit is based on some assessment of Epub ahead of print: [please In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) devel- frailty, comorbidities and likeliness to recover from include Day Month Year]. oped a guidance for the establishment of crisis stan- the intensive treatment.6 doi:10.1136/ In surveying triage protocols, Persad et al7 iden- medethics-2020-106242 dards of care (CSC) based on the ethical principles of fairness, duty to care, duty to steward resources, tified four overarching principles used in treating Solnica A, et al. J Med Ethics 2020;0:1–3. doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106242 1 Current controversy J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2020-106242 on 10 April 2020. Downloaded from people equally: these include lottery and first come, first served Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, the pre- eminent Jewish decider of models; favouring the worse off based on the rule of recuse; the 20th century, writes regarding triage: in my opinion if both utilitarian approach of maximising total benefits; and rewarding arrive at the same time [to the hospital], the decision should be social usefulness which favours essential professions but is made on the basis of medical suitability. The one who has the fraught with potential biases. In relation to the novel COVID-19 best chance of being treated and cured should be given the avail- virus, Emanuel and colleagues8 delineated the ethical values to able bed.12 guide the rationing of scare resources. In line with the utilitarian Another important modern decider, Rabbi Shlomo Zalman approach of maximising benefits, priority of treatment should Auerbach writes ‘that one should primarily take into account be given to those with the greatest chance of survival. Health- the degree of danger and chance for cure’13 in making triage care workers should be given preference to promote and reward decisions. This is in fact how many physicians make their triage usefulness. Care should not be based on first come, first served decisions, they look at the balance between the acuteness of the model but rather, random selection should be used, when all patient and the reversibility of the disease to decide who should patients have a similar prognosis. receive scarce resources. Rav Eliezer Waldenberg, another modern decider, maintains that one can even hold in abeyance life- saving equipment from AN ANCIENT DISPUTE a patient not expected to live in anticipation of the arrival of Most ethical guidelines relating to triage, as we have seen above, a patient with a better prognosis.14 These approaches are all are utilitarian in nature and heavily emphasise the principle consistent with a utilitarian approach to triage based on maxi- of maximising total benefits. The question remains whether mising potential life- saving. However, they all agree that once Halakha (Jewish law) accepts this approach as well. you have initiated treatment with life-saving equipment you In determining Jewish ethics regarding triage, Orthodox Jews cannot remove it to treat another patient. look to the Talmud for guidance. The issue of allocation of scarce resources was addressed thousands of years ago in this book of Jewish law. MODERN APPLicatiONS The Talmud in Baba Mezia (62a) relates: Regarding the case of the two travellers discussed above, Rabbi Karelitz maintains if there is a third person who has one bottle of Two people were traveling on the road and one of them has a bottle water that can only save one person, according to Rabbi Akiva, of water. If both drink, they will both die; if one drinks he will he should give it to who he wants, a position that Rabbi Walden- arrive at the town. Ben Petura expounded; it is better that they both berg agrees with. It appears that the Halakha gives much leeway drink and die and one of them not witness the death of his fellow to the rescuers in deciding who to save. It is not too much of an traveler. Until Rabbi Akiva came and taught ‘and your brother shall 9 intellectual leap to say that in this halakhic void, it is society that live with you’. Your life takes precedence over the life of your brother. should decide as opposed to the individual rescuer and thus the decisions of a national ethics committee are in line with halakhic Sokol explains that the basis of the argument between Ben thinking.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rabbi Asher Schechter Study (718) 591-4888 Fax (718) 228-8677 Email [email protected]
    CONGREGATION OHR MOSHE In Memory of Rav Moshe Feinstein ZT"L 170-16 73rd Avenue Hillcrest, NY 11366 (718) 591-4888 Rabbi Asher Schechter Study (718) 591-4888 Fax (718) 228-8677 Email [email protected] Dear Friends, This letter certifies that all items sold on the BAGEL BOSS WEBSITE are strictly Kosher. The bagels, rolls, challahs, challah rolls and other bread products are PARVE & PAS YISROEL, all other products are ASSUMED DAIRY (either dairy ingredients or dairy utensils) unless a label discloses otherwise. Any questions should be directed to me (contact information above). The following Bagel Boss locations are under my Supervision: Bagel Boss of Carle Place Bagel Boss of East Northport Bagel Boss of Hewlett Bagel Boss of Hicksville Bagel Boss of Jericho* Bagel Boss of Lake Success Bagel Boss of Manhattan (1st Ave.) Bagel Boss of Merrick Bagel Boss of Murray Hill, NYC (3rd Ave.) Bagel Boss of Oceanside Bagel Boss of Roslyn* All these locations mentioned above are owned and operated by Non-Jewish Owners/Partners for Shabbos & Yom Tov. The bagels, rolls, challahs, challah rolls and other bread products baked at these locations (except those with *) are PARVE & PAS YISROEL. All products are assumed DAIRY, unless a sign or label discloses otherwise. All Dairy products are assumed to be Non-Cholov-Yisrael except in Bagel Boss of Manhattan as described in detail in its Certification Letter. Off premises parties are generally not under my Supervision, unless special arrangements are made. .which coincides with September 19, 2020 ראש השנה תשפ"א This letter is valid through With Torah Greetings, Rabbi Asher Schechter AS/tf.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioethics, Sustainability, and Religious Thought
    Hillel Gray, Religious ethics, 2010 1 Introduction for the Piedmont Project. Thanks to the Piedmont Project, an undergraduate course in religious bioethics has been modified to address sustainability issues, primarily the ethics of environmental health. The course would give students an opportunity to apply ethical reasoning and comparative analysis to a series of timely topics in medical ethics and environmental health. Accordingly, the religious bioethics syllabus was expanded to cover several aspects of sustainability. Students in the course would learn about the meaning of sustainability, the connections between medical ethics and sustainability, and the reasons and mechanisms for making health care institutions more sustainable. In addition, through the Piedmont workshop and subsequent research, I have been able to appreciate and utilize religious writings on specific sustainability topics. I had originally planned for the syllabus to consider several environmental health (e.g., endocrine-disrupting chemicals) and comparative methodology (e.g., informed consent and environmental right-to-know) topics that are relevant to both medical ethics and sustainability. However, since several topics lack high-quality religious writings to support stand-alone curricular modules, such topics will be covered by lectures and class exercises. Nonetheless, the syllabus has been expanded significantly to cover sustainability at several levels. To exemplify the relationship between medical ethics and sustainability, the course shows how religious thought struggles with both individual health risks and institutional management of environmental health risks. To demonstrate the diversity of religious thinking on sustainability at the global level, the course will also focus on religious thought and programming on climate change. The course will conclude with topics in biomedical technologies (i.e., reproductive technologies and organ transplantation) that have unexplored implications for sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf Hakashrusedition a PUBLICATION of OU KOSHER ISSUE 15 | YOMIM NORAIM 5778
    CONSUMER Daf HaKashrusEDITION A PUBLICATION OF OU KOSHER WWW.OUKOSHER.ORG ISSUE 15 | YOMIM NORAIM 5778 ALMOST KOSHER IS NOT REALLY KOSHER! Reprinted with permission from the OU’s Jewish Action Summer 2017 Edition, with slight Rabbi Eli Gersten modifications. The title of the original article was “What Could be Wrong With”? RC Recorder of OU Psak and Policy IS IT ACCEPTABLE TO EAT OUT AT A VEGETARIAN OR VEGAN-FRIENDLY INDIAN RESTAURANT IF THE HASHGACHAH (CERTIFYING RABBI OR AGENCY) IS UNRELIABLE? In some circles, it has become increasingly common, and even acceptable, to eat out at Indian restaurants that are vegetarian or vegan-friendly even though the hashgachah may be unreliable. The thinking goes something like this: Indian restaurants don’t serve meat or fish, and I can order foods that don’t contain dairy, so there is very little that can go wrong. Indian restaurants are “almost” kosher. So long as there is a rabbi vouching that it is kosher, though he might have lax standards, isn’t it good enough? This reminds me of the time I received a call from an out-of-town vaad ha’kashrus that was contemplating giving certification to a local Indian restaurant. The restaurant was owned and managed by non-Jews, and there were a number of halachic questions the vaad was unable to resolve. The rabbis decided to speak with Rabbi Yisroel Belsky, zt”l, who was an OU senior posek at the time. Small Jewish communities often lack the resources to support a kosher restaurant. To contend with this challenge, a vaad might try to find an existing (uncertified) restaurant in the neighborhood that is willing to make the necessary changes to become kosher.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BENJAMIN and ROSE BERGER TORAH TO-GO® Established by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld • July 2018 • Av 5778
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary • YU Center for the Jewish Future THE BENJAMIN AND ROSE BERGER TORAH TO-GO® Established by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld • July 2018 • Av 5778 Tisha B’av Dedicated by Rabbi Doniel Z. Kramer in memory of his parents, Rabbi Meyer and Rose Kramer of Philadelphia PA הרב מאיר בן הרב חיים מנחם ז"ל ורייזל בת יהודה לייב ע"ה Emunah in Spiritual Challenges in Difficult Times Times of Persecution Perspectives and insights Looking at the history of on dealing with tragedy and Jewish suffering from the growing from challenges. Crusades to the Holocaust. We thank the following synagogues which have pledged to be Pillars of the Torah To-Go® project Beth David Synagogue Congregation Ohab Zedek Young Israel of West Hartford, CT New York, NY Century City Los Angeles, CA Beth Jacob Congregation Congregation Beverly Hills, CA Shaarei Tefillah Young Israel of Newton Centre, MA New Hyde Park Bnai Israel – Ohev Zedek New Hyde Park, NY Philadelphia, PA Green Road Synagogue Beachwood, OH Young Israel of Congregation Scarsdale Ahavas Achim The Jewish Center Scarsdale, NY Highland Park, NJ New York, NY Young Israel of Congregation Benai Asher Jewish Center of Toco Hills The Sephardic Synagogue Brighton Beach Atlanta, GA of Long Beach Brooklyn, NY Long Beach, NY Young Israel of Koenig Family Foundation Congregation Brooklyn, NY West Hartford Beth Sholom West Hartford, CT Young Israel of Providence, RI Young Israel of Lawrence-Cedarhurst Cedarhurst, NY West Hempstead West Hempstead, NY Rabbi Dr. Ari Berman, President, Yeshiva
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF, 4.47MB)
    ">Nit'' :i">M @> N ASIS OF 5TABI ITV IN AN CE:AN OF TURBULENCE: DARKAH is a non-profit WHO WE ARE organization that provides a unique opportunity for young women who are challenged with anxiety, depression or bipolar disorder. DARKAH's aim is to equip these individuals OUR Ml SS I with the necessary skills and emotional self-sufficiency to progress towards an independent and productive lifestyle within 1-2 years. DARKAH provides a supervised private residential facility for a structured WHAT WE DO group living setting. Our professionally trained house parents assist clients in managing their daily schedule. An experienced social worker monitors each participant's progress in coordination with their treatment team. The broad range of training and instruction includes: ·Self-advocacy/assertiveness ·Budgeting/money management · Stress management ·Home management · Social skills/relationships ·Shopping · Communication ·Meal planning/preparation ·Personal hygiene The group home setting is specifically limited to frum young women aged 17 - 22 suffering from anxiety, depression or bipolar disorder. WHO IT'S FOR Individuals whose challenges are complicated by additional factors such as religious incompatibility 8 ~ are not candidates for the program. I' Fees are determined on an individual basis. THE JEWISH OBSERVER THE ewish IN THIS ISSUE 6 READERS' FORUM B.·•... -·/SEltvER. .. ' . ,., "· ...... , .,, .. ·.· THE JEWISH OBSERVER LEITER FROM JERUSALEM {ISSN) 0021-6615 IS PUBLISHED MONTHLY, EXCEPT JULY k AUGUS'! 7 THE PRICE OF DECEPTION, AND A COMBINED ISSUE FOR JANUARYlf'EBRUARY, BY THE YOnoson Rosenb!urn i\GUO.'\TH ISR.'\EL OF i\MERICA, 42 BROADWAY. NEW YORK, NY 10004. PElllOOlCALS POSTAGE PAID tN NEW I YORK.
    [Show full text]
  • OF 17Th 2004 Gender Relationships in Marriage and Out.Pdf (1.542Mb)
    Gender Relationships In Marriage and Out Edited by Rivkah Blau Robert S. Hirt, Series Editor THE MICHAEL SCHARF PUBLICATION TRUST of the YESHIVA UNIVERSITY PRESs New York OF 17 r18 CS2ME draft 8 balancediii iii 9/2/2007 11:28:13 AM THE ORTHODOX FORUM The Orthodox Forum, initially convened by Dr. Norman Lamm, Chancellor of Yeshiva University, meets each year to consider major issues of concern to the Jewish community. Forum participants from throughout the world, including academicians in both Jewish and secular fields, rabbis,rashei yeshivah, Jewish educators, and Jewish communal professionals, gather in conference as a think tank to discuss and critique each other’s original papers, examining different aspects of a central theme. The purpose of the Forum is to create and disseminate a new and vibrant Torah literature addressing the critical issues facing Jewry today. The Orthodox Forum gratefully acknowledges the support of the Joseph J. and Bertha K. Green Memorial Fund at the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary established by Morris L. Green, of blessed memory. The Orthodox Forum Series is a project of the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, an affiliate of Yeshiva University OF 17 r18 CS2ME draft 8 balancedii ii 9/2/2007 11:28:13 AM Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Orthodox Forum (17th : 2004 : New York, NY) Gender relationships in marriage and out / edited by Rivkah Blau. p. cm. – (Orthodox Forum series) ISBN 978-0-88125-971-1 1. Marriage. 2. Marriage – Religious aspects – Judaism. 3. Marriage (Jewish law) 4. Man-woman relationships – Religious aspects – Judaism. I.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah Online - Rabbi Tuvia Bolton
    Torah Online - Rabbi Tuvia Bolton This week’s Torah portion begins with a bizarre tragedy: On the day that the Jews inaugurated the first ‘House of G-d’ ever, the Tabernacle in the desert, Aaron’s two eldest sons, Nadav and Avihu, became so infatuated with the holiness that they rushed in to the Holy of Holies and were killed by flames that entered their nostrils. This is certainly very interesting and even shocking but seemingly it’s not very relevant to us today, which is the purpose of the Torah. The word ‘Torah’ means ‘teaching’ and every idea in it must be relevant to not only our daily lives but to the very essence of our beings. What is this story doing in the Torah? Today there is no Holy of Holies and people don’t get burnt because of rushing in there. What is the lesson here for us? To understand this here are two stories about Rabbi Moshe Feinstein who passed away almost exactly 25 years ago (13th of Adar 5746) The Torah is G-d's law. It teaches us how to sanctify every detail of the world. But it takes an unusual talent to know what the law is in every situation and such a person was Rabbi Moshe Feinstein. He was one of the greatest 'Poskim' (deciders of Torah law) of all time. The story is told about him that in 1933 when he was a rabbi in the U.S.S.R. in the city of Liubon, the Communists, in their ruthless drive to eradicate Judaism, announced one day that the women’s Mikva was ‘unhealthy’ and had it unceremoniously demolished and rebuilt as a public swimming pool and bathhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Halacha Defining Death Jewish Medical Ethics: the Brain Death Controversy in Jewish Law by Rabbi Yitzchok A
    החידון המדע הירושלמי Jerusalem Science Contest Part 3, Slides 14 thru 21 Jewish Law Decisions Halacha defining death Jewish Medical Ethics: The Brain Death Controversy in Jewish Law by Rabbi Yitzchok A. Breitowitz, 1996 Rabbi Breitowitz received his Rabbinical Ordination from the Ner Israel Rabbinical College in 1976; B.S. with honors from Johns Hopkins University; J.D (magna cum laude) from Harvard Law School in 1979; and a Doctorate in Talmudic Law from Ner Israel in 1992. He has lectured extensively throughout the US and Israel on medical, business, and family ethics. He has published numerous articles on bankruptcy, commercial law, medical ethics, family law, and halakha.In addition to being the Rabbi of the Woodside Synagogue in SIlver Spring MD, Rabbi Breitowitz is a Professor of Law at the University of Maryland. The issues that need to be decided under Jewish Law. 1. Is irreversible dysfunction of the entire brain a valid criterion of death under Jewish Law? a. If No, then, such a person is alive. b. If Yes, the following issue must be decided: 2. Are the medical tests currently utilized in establishing such a condition valid indicators of its presence under Jewish Law? a. Which Tests? b. Are the tests being utilized in the patient’s facility tests that qualify under Jewish law? Mishnah Oholot 1:6 ָאָדם ֵאינֹו ְמַטֵמא, ַעֶׁדשֵתֵצאַ נְפשֹו. ַוֲאִפּלּוְ מֻגָּיד, ַוֲאִפּלּוֵ גֹוסס. זֹוֵקק ַלִיּבּום ּופֹוֵטִר מןַ הִיּבּום, ַמֲאִכילַ ּבְתָּרּומהֵּופֹוסלַ ּבְתָּרּומה. וְכֵן ְּבֵהָּמהְ וַחָּיה ֵאָּינןְמַטְמִאין, ַעדֶׁ שֵתֵצאַ נְפָּשם. ֻהְתזּוָ רֵאשֶׁיהם, ַאףַ עִּל פיֶׁ שְמַפְרְכִּסים, ְטֵמִּאים, ְכָּגֹון זָּנֶׁב של ְלָּטָּאהֶׁשִהיא ְמַפְרָּכֶׁסת: A person does not defile [as a corpse] until he dies.
    [Show full text]
  • Verapo Yerape Inside REV.Indd
    “Verapo Yerape,” Part II: Uncovering a Latent Hashkafi c Divide Origins of the Debate: an Alternative Approach1 Rabbi Dr. Howard Apfel There is a far greater chidush (novelty) and even more pro- found hashkafi c (worldview) controversy that can be found in a more subtle dimension of the verapo yerape discussion. It is actually within the fi rst approach alone (that human in- terference is inherently immoral) that both sides of the con- temporary hashkafi c divide most sharply reveal themselves. To reiterate, Tosafot and Rashba (Bava Kama 85a) sug- gested the possibility that interfering with internal disease is being “soter gezerat ha’melech” (attempting to abrogate the Divine decree). The double expression “verapo yerape” teaches however, “kemashmelan de’shari,” that nevertheless it is permissible. What exactly is “kemashmelan de’shari” re- ferring to? Most commentators discussing this issue assume 1 Editor’s note: See the author’s previous article in the fi rst volume of Verapo Yerape: And You Shall Surely Heal (Ktav 2009). Rabbi Dr. Howard Apfel is a board certifi ed pediatric cardiologist at Columbia University Medical Center. He received his rabbinic ordination from the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary of Yeshiva University in 2003. This year Rabbi Apfel will be a R”AM at Yeshivat Toras Shraga and Adjunct Instructor of Medical Halakha at Yeshiva University. 1 2 • Verapo Yerape that the permission being referred to by these words was specifi cally the permission to heal the sick. Is that truly the only tenable interpretation? In reality, careful objective scrutiny suggests that there are in fact two possibilities for interpretation of these words.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Responses to Homosexuality and Halakhah
    Contemporary Responses to Homosexuality and Halakhah 1. R’ Moshe Feinstein – Igrot Moshe Orah Hayyim 4:115, 1976 (excerpts) The first thing you need to know is that homosexuality has the severe punishment of stoning and karet and it is also called disgusting by the Torah itself. It is one of the most debased sins and it even is prohibited for non‑ Jews. This knowledge is a strong bulwark against the yetzer harah. Secondly it is inexplicable that there should be a lust for it. That is because in the creation of man himself there is no natural lust for homosexuality… The desire for homosexual relations is against natural lust and even the wicked do not have a desire for it itself. Rather their entire desire for it is only because it is something prohibited and the yetzer harah seduces them to rebel against the will of God. This knowledge of what is the will of God is a powerful protection against the yetzer harah. You have already defeated the yetzer harah in that you believe in God and all the 13 principles of faith and the entire Torah. With this you can defeat the yetzer harah in this that it seduces you to rebel against God and to anger Him. There is an explicit verse in HaAzinu “That with abominations they provoke Him to anger” [Devarim 32:16] Rashi says an example is homosexuality which is a sin which causes God’s anger. He also says this regarding magic which interferes with the Heavenly family as is stated in Sanhedrin (67b).
    [Show full text]
  • SHERRY CASKS a Halachic Perspective
    SHERRY CASKS A Halachic Perspective A Comprehensive Overview of Scotch Production and its Kashrus Implications SECOND, EXPANDED EDITION Rabbi Akiva Niehaus SHERRY CASKS A Halachic Perspective A Comprehensive Overview of Scotch Production and its Kashrus Implications Rabbi Akiva Niehaus Chicago Community Kollel Reviewed by Rabbi Dovid Zucker, Rosh Kollel Published by the Chicago Community Kollel Adar 5772 / March 2012 Second, Expanded Edition Copyright © 2012 Rabbi Akiva Niehaus Chicago Community Kollel 6506 N. California Ave. Chicago, IL 60645 (773)262-9400 First Edition: June 2010 Second, Expanded Edition: March 2012 Questions and Comments or to request an accompanying PowerPoint: (773)338-0849 [email protected] 6506 N. California Ave. Chicago, IL 60645 (773) 262-4000 Fax (773) 262-7866 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.cckollel.org Haskamah from Rabbi Akiva Osher Padwa, Senior Rabbinical Coordinator & Director of Certification, London Beis Din – Kashrus Division הרב עקיבא אשר פדווא Rabbi Akiva Padwa מומחה לעניני כשרות Kashrus Consultant & Coordinator פק״ק לונדון יצ״ו London UK בס״ד ר״ח כסליו תשע״ב לפ״ק, פה לונדון יצ״ו I consider it indeed an honor and a privilege to have been asked to give a Haskoma to this Kuntrus “Sherry Casks: A Halachic Perspective”. Having read the Kuntrus I found it to be Me’at Kamus but Rav Aichus. Much has been written over the last few decades about whisky, however many of the articles written were based on incorrect technical details that do not reflect the realities at the distilleries. Many others may be factually and technically correct, but do not relate in depth to Divrei HaPoskim Z”TL.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik's
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 2005 Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik’s ‘Confrontation’: A Reassessment Marshall J. Breger The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Marshall J. Breger, Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik’s ‘Confrontation’: A Reassessment, 1 STUD. CHRISTIAN- JEWISH REL. 151 (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations A peer-reviewed e-journal of the Council of Centers in Jewish-Christian Relations Published by the Center for Christian-Jewish Learning at Boston College A Reassessment of Rav Soloveitchik’s Essay on Interfaith Dialogue: “Confrontation” Marshall J. Breger Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America Volume 1 (2005-2006): pp. 151-169 http://escholarship.bc.edu/scjr/vol1/iss1/art18 Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations Volume 1, (2005-2006): 151-169 Introduction1 by Boston College.5 That reassessment in turn brought forth further comments.6 Below are some of my own reactions to We recently passed the fortieth anniversary of Rabbi this ongoing debate. Soloveitchik’s magisterial essay on interreligious dialogue, Soloveitchik’s essay presents a complex argument Confrontation.2 Rabbi Soloveitchik (1903-1993) was the based on a moral anthropology embedded in an leading modern Orthodox religious authority in America interpretation of the biblical account of the creation of man.7 during his lifetime and his religious opinions and rulings are The article develops three paradigms of human nature.
    [Show full text]