Benthos Ecology Working Group

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Benthos Ecology Working Group Marine Habitat Committee ICES CM 19991E:1 Ref.: ACME+C REPORT OF THE BENTHOS ECOLOGY WORKING GROUP Kristineberg, Sweden 28 April-l May 1999 This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer Palregade 2-4 DK-1261 Copenhagen KDenmark TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page OPENING OF THE MEETING ................................................................................................................................. 1 2 APPOINTMENT OF RAPPORTEUR ....................................................................................................................... 1 3 TERMS OF REFERENCE ......................................................................................................................................... 1 4 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA ................................................................................................................................ 2 5 REPORT ON THE 1998 ICES ANNUAL SCIENCE CONFERENCE IN LISBON, PORTUGAL ......................... 2 6 REPORT ON MEETING OF ACME AND OTHER MEETINGS OF INTEREST .................................................. 2 6.1 ACME Meeting ............................................................................................................................................... 2 6.2 ICES Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem (y.IGEXT) ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 6.3 ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (y.IGITMO) ............................. 3 6.4 OSPARlICESIEEA Workshop on Habitat Classification and Biogeographic Regions and ICES Study Group on Marine Habitat Mapping (SGMHM) ............................................................................................... 3 6.5 ICES Study Group on Marine Biodiversity (SGMB) ...................................................................................... 3 6.6 ICES Benthos Dynamics Symposium, Crete, October 1998 .......................................................................... .4 6.7 ICES/SCOR Symposium on Ecosystem Effects of Fisheries (Montpellier, March 1999) ............................. .4 6.8 Baltic Activities .............................................................................................................................................. .4 7 REPORT ON COOPERATIVE STUDIES AND OTHER STUDIES RELEVANT TO ICES (INCLUDING ACTION LIST OF 1998 BEWG MEETING) ........................................................................................................... .4 7.1 Databases ........................................................................................................................................................ .4 7.2 Study of Hyperbenthic Populations ................................................................................................................. 5 7.3 Long-term Benthic Studies .............................................................................................................................. 6 7.4 Monitoring Programmes .................................................................................................................................. 7 7.5 Alien Species ................................................................................................................................................... 8 7.6 Coral Reefs ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 7.7 Transport Studies ............................................................................................................................................. 9 7.8 Studies on Invertebrate By-catch ..................................................................................................................... 9 7.9 North Sea Benthos Studies .............................................................................................................................. 9 7.10 Sand Extraction and Dumping of Dredge Spoil... .......................................................................................... 10 7.11 Other Studies ................................................................................................................................................. 12 8 NORTH SEA BENTHOS PROJECT ....................................................................................................................... 12 9 MERITS OF (NEW) SAMPLING APPROACHES AND NEW SAMPLING DEVICES ...................................... 13 9.1 Mapping of Marine Benthic Habitats of Browns Bank (Southern Scotian Shelf) ......................................... 13 9.2 Mapping of UK Gravel Biotopes and an Examination of the Factors Controlling the Distribution, Type, and Diversity of their Biological Communities ................................................................................... 13 10 DEVELOPMENTS IN COMPUTER AIDS IN BENTHIC STUDIES (TAXONOMIC AND OPERATIONAL) .. 14 10.1 Identification Keys on CD-ROM ................................................................................................................... 14 10.2 BioMarViewer .............................................................................................................................................. 14 10.3 Identification Keys on Epibenthos ................................................................................................................. 14 11 ADVICE ON QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES FOR BENTHOS STUDIES ......................................... 14 11.1 Review of Standard Operating Procedures .................................................................................................... 14 11.2 Review of Case Studies ................................................................................................................................. 15 11.3 Inventory of National Guidelines ................................................................................................................... 17 12 GENERAL GUIDELINES ON QA FOR BIOLOGICAL MONITORING (REQUEST FROM SGQAE) ............. 17 13 GUIDELINES FOR EPIFAUNAL SAMPLING AND COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION OF EPIBIOTA .............. 17 14 ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF NORTH ATLANTIC OSCILLATIONS (NAO) ON BENTHIC POPULATION PARAMETERS .............................................................................................................................. 18 14.1 Causal Relationships in Long-term Changes of Benthos in Gullmarsfjorden, western Sweden .................... 18 15 CONTRIBUTION TO THE MARINE HABITAT COMMITTEE [MHC] STRATEGIC PLAN ........................... 18 16 ANY OTHER BUSINESS ........................................................................................................................................ 19 16.1 Joint Meeting with WGFTFB ........................................................................................................................ 19 16.2 New Chair .......................................................................................................... :........................................... 19 16.3 Socio-economic Approaches ......................................................................................................................... 19 Section Page 17 RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION LIST ....................................................................................................... 19 17.1 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................... 19 17.2 Action List ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 18 VENUE AND DATE OF THE NEXT MEETING ................................................................................................... 21 19 CLOSING OF THE MEETING ...................................... ;........................................................................................ 21 ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ............................................................................................................................ 22 ANNEX 2: AGENDA ....................................................................................................................................................... 24 ANNEX 3: OSPARJICESIEEA WORKSHOP ON HABITAT CLASSIFICATION AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC REGIONS ................................................................................................................................................................. 25 ANNEX 4: REPORT ON THE ICES SYMPOSIUM, MARINE BENTHOS DYNAMICS: ENVIRONMENTAL AND FISHERIES IMPACTS ................................................................................................................................... 30 ANNEX 5: UNDERWATER VIDEO-TECHNIQUE AS A TOOL FOR THE BENTHIC MONITORING IN THE GERMAN PART OF THE BALTIC SEA ............................................................................................................... 34
Recommended publications
  • AMPHIPODA Sheet 103 SUB-ORDER: HYPERIIDEA Family: Hyperiidae (BY M
    CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER Zooplankton AMPHIPODA Sheet 103 SUB-ORDER: HYPERIIDEA Family: Hyperiidae (BY M. J. DUNBAR) 1963 https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.4917 -2- 1. Hyperia galba, 9;a, per. 1; b, per. 2. - 2. Hyperia medusarum, 9;a, per. 1 ; b, per. 2. - 3. Hyperoche rnedusarum, 8; a, per. 1 ; b, per. 2. - 4. Parathemisto abyssorum, Q; a, per. 3; b, uropods. - 5. Para- themisto gauchicaudi (“short-legged” form), 9; a, per. 3; b, uropods; c, per. 5. - 6. Parathemisto libellula, Q; a, per. 3; b, uropods; c, per. 5. - 7. Parathemisto gracilipes, (first antenna not drawn in full); a, per. 5; b, uropods 3. (Figures 7, 7a and 7b redrawn from HURLEY;Figure 6c original; remainder drawn from SARS.) The limbs of the peraeon, or peraeopods, are here numbered in series from 1 to 7, numbers 1 and 2 being also called “gnathopods”; “per.” = peraeopod. Only the species of the northern part of the North Atlantic are treated here; the Mediterranean species are omitted. The family is still in need of revision. Family Hyperiidae Key to the genera:- la. Per. 5-7 considerably longer than per. 3 and 4. ........................................................ Parathemisto Boeck lb. Per. 5 and 6 longer than 3 and 4; per. 7 much shorter than 5 and 6 ..................Hyperioides longipes Chevreux (not figured) lc. Per. 5-7 not longer than 3 and 4 ....................................................................................... 2 2a. Per. 1 and 2, the fixed finger (onjoint 5) of thechelanot shorter than the movable finger (joint 6). ...Hyperoche medusarum (Kroyer) (Fig. 3) 2b. Per.
    [Show full text]
  • ANALYSIS of HARRISON BAY ZOOPLANKTON SAMPLES by Rita
    ANALYSIS OF HARRISON BAY ZOOPLANKTON SAMPLES by Rita Homer 4211 N.E. 88th Street Seattle, Washington 98115 Final Report Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit 359 1 April 1981 167 Methods Zooplankton samples were collected by LGL personnel at eight stations in Harrison Bay (Table 1), 8-9 Aug 1980. All samples were collected with a 0.75 m ring net, mesh size 308 pm. One vertical and one double oblique tow were taken at each station. However, the boat drifted with the wind so most of the vertical tows had some horizontal component as well. Maximum depth of tow was generally 6-9 m. Three apparently benthic samples were also sent to us for analysis. These samples, all from station 5, did not have haul sheets, so we do not know how they were collected. Perhaps they were collected when the plankton net inadvertently dragged along the bottom or perhaps they were sent to us by mistake. We assumed they were benthic samples from the presence of sediment and other debris and the number of burrowing amphipods. Except for the double oblique tow from sta 6 that was split with a Folsom plankton splitter (McEwan et al. 1954), all organisms other than copepods were identified from the whole sample. Copepods were subsampled using an automatic pipet. All sorting and counting were done using dissecting microscopes. Compound microscopes were used to verify identifi- cations when necessary. References used to identify the organisms are listed in Table 2. Equations used to calculate the number of animals per unit volume were: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ectosymbiotic Behavior of Cancer Gracilis and Its Trophic Relationships with Its Host Phacellophora Camtschatica and the Parasitoid Hyperia Medusarum
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 315: 221–236, 2006 Published June 13 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Ectosymbiotic behavior of Cancer gracilis and its trophic relationships with its host Phacellophora camtschatica and the parasitoid Hyperia medusarum Trisha Towanda*, Erik V. Thuesen Laboratory I, Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington 98505, USA ABSTRACT: In southern Puget Sound, large numbers of megalopae and juveniles of the brachyuran crab Cancer gracilis and the hyperiid amphipod Hyperia medusarum were found riding the scypho- zoan Phacellophora camtschatica. C. gracilis megalopae numbered up to 326 individuals per medusa, instars reached 13 individuals per host and H. medusarum numbered up to 446 amphipods per host. Although C. gracilis megalopae and instars are not seen riding Aurelia labiata in the field, instars readily clung to A. labiata, as well as an artificial medusa, when confined in a planktonkreisel. In the laboratory, C. gracilis was observed to consume H. medusarum, P. camtschatica, Artemia franciscana and A. labiata. Crab fecal pellets contained mixed crustacean exoskeletons (70%), nematocysts (20%), and diatom frustules (8%). Nematocysts predominated in the fecal pellets of all stages and sexes of H. medusarum. In stable isotope studies, the δ13C and δ15N values for the megalopae (–19.9 and 11.4, respectively) fell closely in the range of those for H. medusarum (–19.6 and 12.5, respec- tively) and indicate a similar trophic reliance on the host. The broad range of δ13C (–25.2 to –19.6) and δ15N (10.9 to 17.5) values among crab instars reflects an increased diversity of diet as crabs develop. The association between C.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperia Galba in the North Sea Birgit Dittrich*
    HELGOLANDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN Helgol&nder Meeresunters. 42, 79-98 (1988) Studies on the life cycle and reproduction of the parasitic amphipod Hyperia galba in the North Sea Birgit Dittrich* Lehrstuhl ffir Speziefle Zoologie und Parasitologie, Ruhr-Universit~t Bochum; D-4630 Bochum 1 and Biologische Anstalt Helgoland (Meeresstation); D-2192 Helgoland, Federal Republic of Germany ABSTRACT: The structure of a Hyperia galba population, and its seasonal fluctuations were studied in the waters of the German Bight around the island of Helgoland over a period of two years (1984 and 1985). A distinct seasonal periodicity in the distribution pattern of this amphipod was recorded. During summer, when its hosts - the scyphomedusae Aurelia aurita, Chrysaora hysoscella, Rhizo- stoma pulmo, Cyanea capillata and Cyanea lamarckn'- occur in large numbers, supplying shelter and food, a population explosion of H. galba can be observed. It is caused primarily by the relatively high fecundity of H. galba which greatly exceeds that of other amphipods: a maximum of 456 eggs was observed. The postembryonic development is completed in the medusae infested; only then are the young able to swim and search for a new host. The smallest fr4ely-swimming hyperians obtained from plankton samples were 2.6 mm in body size. The size classes observed as well as moult increment and moulting frequencies in relation to different temperatures suggest that two genera- tions are developed per year: a rapidly growing generation in summer and a slower growing generation in winter that shifts to a benthic mode of life and hibernation. For short periods, adult hyperians may become attached to zooplankters other than scyphomedusae.
    [Show full text]
  • Dermochelys Coriacea)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Synopsis of the Biological Data on the Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) Biological Technical Publication BTP-R4015-2012 Guillaume Feuillet U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Synopsis of the Biological Data on the Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) Biological Technical Publication BTP-R4015-2012 Karen L. Eckert 1 Bryan P. Wallace 2 John G. Frazier 3 Scott A. Eckert 4 Peter C.H. Pritchard 5 1 Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network, Ballwin, MO 2 Conservation International, Arlington, VA 3 Smithsonian Institution, Front Royal, VA 4 Principia College, Elsah, IL 5 Chelonian Research Institute, Oviedo, FL Author Contact Information: Recommended citation: Eckert, K.L., B.P. Wallace, J.G. Frazier, S.A. Eckert, Karen L. Eckert, Ph.D. and P.C.H. Pritchard. 2012. Synopsis of the biological Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network data on the leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys (WIDECAST) coriacea). U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and 1348 Rusticview Drive Wildlife Service, Biological Technical Publication Ballwin, Missouri 63011 BTP-R4015-2012, Washington, D.C. Phone: (314) 954-8571 E-mail: [email protected] For additional copies or information, contact: Sandra L. MacPherson Bryan P. Wallace, Ph.D. National Sea Turtle Coordinator Sea Turtle Flagship Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation International 7915 Baymeadows Way, Ste 200 2011 Crystal Drive Jacksonville, Florida 32256 Suite 500 Phone: (904) 731-3336 Arlington, Virginia 22202 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (703) 341-2663 E-mail: [email protected] Series Senior Technical Editor: Stephanie L. Jones John (Jack) G. Frazier, Ph.D. Nongame Migratory Bird Coordinator Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sound Biodiversity, Threats, and Transboundary Protection.Indd
    2017 The Sound: Biodiversity, threats, and transboundary protection 2 Windmills near Copenhagen. Denmark. © OCEANA/ Carlos Minguell Credits & Acknowledgments Authors: Allison L. Perry, Hanna Paulomäki, Tore Hejl Holm Hansen, Jorge Blanco Editor: Marta Madina Editorial Assistant: Ángeles Sáez Design and layout: NEO Estudio Gráfico, S.L. Cover photo: Oceana diver under a wind generator, swimming over algae and mussels. Lillgrund, south of Øresund Bridge, Sweden. © OCEANA/ Carlos Suárez Recommended citation: Perry, A.L, Paulomäki, H., Holm-Hansen, T.H., and Blanco, J. 2017. The Sound: Biodiversity, threats, and transboundary protection. Oceana, Madrid: 72 pp. Reproduction of the information gathered in this report is permitted as long as © OCEANA is cited as the source. Acknowledgements This project was made possible thanks to the generous support of Svenska PostkodStiftelsen (the Swedish Postcode Foundation). We gratefully acknowledge the following people who advised us, provided data, participated in the research expedition, attended the October 2016 stakeholder gathering, or provided other support during the project: Lars Anker Angantyr (The Sound Water Cooperation), Kjell Andersson, Karin Bergendal (Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, Malmö/Skåne), Annelie Brand (Environment Department, Helsingborg municipality), Henrik Carl (Fiskeatlas), Magnus Danbolt, Magnus Eckeskog (Greenpeace), Søren Jacobsen (Association for Sensible Coastal Fishing), Jens Peder Jeppesen (The Sound Aquarium), Sven Bertil Johnson (The Sound Fund), Markus Lundgren
    [Show full text]
  • Planktonic Associations Between Medusae (Classes Scyphozoa and Hydrozoa) and Epifaunal Crustaceans
    Planktonic associations between medusae (classes Scyphozoa and Hydrozoa) and epifaunal crustaceans Kaden Muffett and Maria Pia Miglietta Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University - Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States ABSTRACT Jellyfish are known to carry various epibionts, including many of the subphylum Crustacea. However, the associations between gelatinous zooplankton and other invertebrates have been chronically overlooked. Crustacea, a massive clade of economically, ecologically, and culturally important species, includes many taxa that utilize gelatinous zooplankton for food, transport, and protection as both adults and juveniles. Here we compile 211 instances of epifaunal crustaceans recorded on Hydromedusae and Scyphomedusae from a century of literature. These include 78 identified crustacean species in 65 genera across nine orders found upon 37 Hydromedusa species and 48 Scyphomedusae. The crustacean life stage, location, nature of the association with the medusa, years, months, and depths are compiled to form a comprehensive view of the current state of the literature. Additionally, this review highlights areas where the current literature is lacking, particularly noting our poor understanding of the relationships between juvenile crabs of commercially valuable species and medusae. Subjects Ecology, Marine Biology, Zoology Keywords Hydrozoa, Scyphozoa, Crustacea, Association, Commensal, Epifauna, Marine, Jellyfish, Medusa Submitted 17 December 2020 Accepted 24 March 2021 BACKGROUND Published 23 April 2021 An increased focus on ocean climate research in the past 20 years has made clear the Corresponding author fragility of the world’s oceans and the organisms that live within them. The rate at which Kaden Muffett, species are disappearing, undergoing climate-related range fluctuations, and experiencing [email protected] developmental and behavioral changes is unlike anything seen in the time of record Academic editor Antonina Dos Santos (Walther et al., 2002; Guinotte & Fabry, 2008; Comeaux, Allison & Bianchi, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • J/V/~ V Wim Vader - 2
    '" t. AMPHIPOD : 1 I ,~j NE WSLETTER 3 V october 1973 This third issue of the Amphipod Newsletter is the first to appear lD off-set. This has become possible through the most welcome help of Zoo- Tax, a "Service CeYit er of Taxonorr.ic Zoology" in Lund, Sweden, and Zoo- Tax is also responsible for the distribution of this issue. Technical Pl'l)blems in connection wi th these changes have caused some delay in the 2oIT,Fleter: ,el"_t of this issue, but I hope this will be counteracted by increased quality and lowered cost: Zoo- Tax is incredibly cheap. I prem.ised to suggest a subscription fee in this lssue. I now propose a fee of 4. German Mark (BRD) annually (or rat'her; for 2 issues) , preferably to be paid by International Money Order to my address in TromS0. As far as I can see, ttis will be sufficient and it will even enable us to send the Newsletter cheaper ( or even free ) to a few COlleagues with very limited budgets. The first subscription will cover Newsletter 2 and 3, and it would be an advantage if many of you could at the same time pay the next subscription, so that I 'll have some credit. I all1 most grateful to those COlleagues who have sent me money earlier, and they 211'e of course not expected to pay now. In the next issue I shall give further details of the financia l situation; meanwhile I shall be glad to have your comments. Apart froni the ~sual i tems I have sol icited three other types of contri­ bution for this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/ Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center Invertebrate Literature Library (updated 9 May 2012, 4056 entries) (1958-1959). Proceedings of the salt marsh conference held at the Marine Institute of the University of Georgia, Apollo Island, Georgia March 25-28, 1958. Salt Marsh Conference, The Marine Institute, University of Georgia, Sapelo Island, Georgia, Marine Institute of the University of Georgia. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Caprellidea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Gammaridea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1981). Stomatopods. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Eastern Central Atlantic; fishing areas 34,47 (in part).Canada Funds-in Trust. Ottawa, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, by arrangement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vols. 1-7. W. Fischer, G. Bianchi and W. B. Scott. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume II. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume III. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Studies of Pelagic Hyperiidean Amphipods Of
    ?cr. to' eO v. SYSTEMATIC STUDIES OF PELAGIC HYPERIIDEAi\ AMPHIPODS OF THE INFRAORDER PHYS OCEPHALATA (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA: HYPE,RIIDEA) by Wotfgang Zeidler, B.Sc. (Hons), MSc. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy within the UniversitY of Adelaide Department of Environmental Biology August 2000 Volume I: Text, Appendices and Bibliography ll Contents Abstract vi Statement vln Acknowledgments ix 1. Introduction 1 2. Evolution/Phylogeny ofHyperiidean Amphipods 6 3. Materials and Methods 9 4. Note on Major pre-2Oth Century Collections 13 5. Systematics 16 Suborder HYPERIIDEA Milne-Edwards, 1 830 l6 Infraorder PHYSOSOMATA Pirlot, 1929 16 Infraorder PHYSOCEPHALATA Bowman & Gruner, 1973 18 5.1 Superfamily VIBILIOIDEA Bowman & Gruner,1973 23 Family VIBILIIDAE Dana, 1852 24 Vibilia H. Milne-Edwards, 1830 26 Vibilioides Cheweux, 1905 74 Family CYLLOPODIDAE Bovallius, 1 887 77 Cyllopus Dana, 1853 78 Family PARAPHRONIMIDAE Bovallius, 1 887 84 P ar ap hr o nim a Claus, | 87 9 85 5.2 Superfamily CYSTISOMATOIDEA new superfamily 92 Family CYSTISOMATIDAE Willemöes-Suhm, I 875 92 Cy s t i s o m a Guérin-Mén ev ille, | 8 42 93 5.3 Superfamily PHRONIMOIDEA Bowman & Gruner,1973 120 Family PHRONIMIDAE Dana, 1852 t22 Phronima Latreille, 1 802 r23 Phronimella Claus, 1 871 t32 Family PHROSINIDAE Dana, 1852 134 Phrosina Risso, 1822 135 Anchyl omer a Mllne-Edwards, 1 8 3 0 t37 Primno Guérin-Méneville, 1 836 t39 111 Family HYPEzuIDAE Dana, 1852 t45 Hyperia Latreille in Desmarest, 1823 t47 Themisto Guérin, 1825 t49 Hyperiella Bovallius, 1 887
    [Show full text]
  • M 13272 Supplement
    Supplement to Arfianti & Costello (2020) – Mar Ecol Prog Ser 638:83-94 – https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13272 Table S1. List of datasets used in the study. No. of No. of Dataset species occurrences Australian Museum Marine Invertebrate Collection 1,034 9,211 Type locality distributions from the World Register of Marine 998 1,083 Species National Museum of Natural History Invertebrate Zoology 917 14,844 Collections Antarctic Amphipod Crustaceans: Ant'Phipoda Database (BIANZO) 731 4,915 Museums Victoria Marine Invertebrates Collection 512 5,864 EPA'S EMAP Database 419 10,496 iziko South African Museum - Crustacean Collection 409 1,448 cariaco-phytoplankton 389 389 Biodiversity of the Gulf of Mexico Database (BioGoMx) 316 2,077 MAREANO - Base-line mapping of hyperbenthic crustacea fauna 312 4,028 obtained with RP-sledge RSMP Baseline Dataset 305 77,808 Benthic Network 277 10,687 NBI 274 9,190 Biological observations from the Discovery Investigations 1925- 264 1,756 1952 National Benthic Infaunal Database 262 8,985 The UK Archive for Marine Species and Habitats Data 248 16,599 IndOBIS, Indian Ocean Node of OBIS 228 287 Arctic benthic invertebrate collection of the Zoological Institute of 226 4,930 the Russian Academy of Science NEFSC Benthic Database 217 16,739 Crustaceos del Museo de Ciencias naturales de la Universidad Simón 198 4,530 Bolívar Mediterranean Ocean Biogeographic Information System 197 1,624 NIWA Invertebrate Collection 190 860 Atlantic Reference Centre Museum of Canadian Atlantic Organisms 189 1,833 - Invertebrates and Fishes
    [Show full text]
  • Jellyfish (Cnidaria/Ctenophora)
    JELLYFISH (CNIDARIA/CTENOPHORA) CARE MANUAL CREATED BY THE AZA AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Jellyfish Care Manual Jellyfish Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate TAG. (2013). Jellyfish Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. p. 79. Authors and Significant Contributors: Jerry Crow, Waikiki Aquarium Michael Howard, Monterey Bay Aquarium Vincent Levesque, Birch Aquarium/Museum at Scripps Leslee Matsushige, Birch Aquarium/Museum at Scripps Steve Spina, New England Aquarium Mike Schaadt, Cabrillo Marine Aquarium Nancy Sowinski, Sunset Marine Labs Chad Widmer, Monterey Bay Aquarium Bruce Upton, Monterey Bay Aquarium Edited by: Mike Schaadt, Cabrillo Marine Aquarium Reviewers: Pete Mohan, Akron Zoo, AZA Aquatic Invertebrate TAG Chair Mackenzie Neale, Vancouver Aquarium Nancy Sowinski, Sunset Marine Labs Chad Widmer, Monterey Bay Aquarium Emma Rees (Cartwright), Weymouth Sealife Park Dr. Poh Soon Chow, Oceanis World Rebecca Helm, Brown University AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seamen, AZA ACM Intern Candice Dorsey, Ph.D., Director, Animal Conservation Cover Photo Credits: Gary Florin Illustrations: Celeste Schaadt Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management. The manual assembles basic requirements, best practices, and animal care recommendations to maximize capacity for excellence in animal care and welfare. The manual should be considered a work in progress, since practices continue to evolve through advances in scientific knowledge. The use of information within this manual should be in accordance with all local, state, and federal laws and regulations concerning the care of animals.
    [Show full text]