DOCSLIB.ORG

Dermochelys Coriacea)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dermochelys Coriacea) U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Synopsis of the Biological Data on the Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) Biological Technical Publication BTP-R4015-2012 Guillaume Feuillet U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Synopsis of the Biological Data on the Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) Biological Technical Publication BTP-R4015-2012 Karen L. Eckert 1 Bryan P. Wallace 2 John G. Frazier 3 Scott A. Eckert 4 Peter C.H. Pritchard 5 1 Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network, Ballwin, MO 2 Conservation International, Arlington, VA 3 Smithsonian Institution, Front Royal, VA 4 Principia College, Elsah, IL 5 Chelonian Research Institute, Oviedo, FL Author Contact Information: Recommended citation: Eckert, K.L., B.P. Wallace, J.G. Frazier, S.A. Eckert, Karen L. Eckert, Ph.D. and P.C.H. Pritchard. 2012. Synopsis of the biological Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network data on the leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys (WIDECAST) coriacea). U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and 1348 Rusticview Drive Wildlife Service, Biological Technical Publication Ballwin, Missouri 63011 BTP-R4015-2012, Washington, D.C. Phone: (314) 954-8571 E-mail: [email protected] For additional copies or information, contact: Sandra L. MacPherson Bryan P. Wallace, Ph.D. National Sea Turtle Coordinator Sea Turtle Flagship Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation International 7915 Baymeadows Way, Ste 200 2011 Crystal Drive Jacksonville, Florida 32256 Suite 500 Phone: (904) 731-3336 Arlington, Virginia 22202 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (703) 341-2663 E-mail: [email protected] Series Senior Technical Editor: Stephanie L. Jones John (Jack) G. Frazier, Ph.D. Nongame Migratory Bird Coordinator Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 1500 Remount Road P.O. Box 25486 DFC Front Royal, Virginia 22630 Denver, Colorado 80225 Phone: (540) 635-6564 Phone: (303) 236-4409 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Scott A. Eckert, Ph.D. Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST) Department of Biology and Natural Resources Principia College Elsah, Illinois 62028 Phone: (314) 566-6301 E-mail: [email protected] Peter C.H. Pritchard, Ph.D. Chelonian Research Institute 401 South Central Avenue Oviedo, Florida 32765 Phone: (407) 365-6347 E-mail: [email protected] Editor: Sandra L. MacPherson National Sea Turtle Coordinator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 7915 Baymeadows Way, Ste 200 Jacksonville, Florida 32256 Phone: (904) 731-3336 E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 2160-9498 Electronic ISSN 2160-9497 Biological Technical Publications online: http://library.fws.gov/BiologicalTechnicalPublications.html iv Synopsis of the Biological Data on the Leatherback Sea Turtle Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ ix List of Tables .................................................................................................................. x Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ xii Executive Summary ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Chapter 1: Identity ........................................................................................................... 2 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................... 2 Valid Name ................................................................................................................... 2 Synonymy .................................................................................................................... 2 Type Locality ................................................................................................................ 3 Taxonomy ........................................................................................................................ 3 Affinities ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 Diagnosis ................................................................................................................. 4 Taxonomic Status ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4 Subspecies ................................................................................................................... 5 Standard Common Names ................................................................................................ 5 Definition of Size Categories .............................................................................................. 5 Morphology ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 6 Description................................................................................................................... 6 External Morphology and Coloration ..................................................................................12 Coloration ...............................................................................................................13 Eggs ......................................................................................................................13 Internal Morphology ......................................................................................................13 Alimentary System ....................................................................................................14 Respiratory System ...................................................................................................15 Circulatory System ....................................................................................................15 Urogenital System .....................................................................................................15 Muscular System ......................................................................................................16 Cranial Morphology .......................................................................................................16 Skull ......................................................................................................................16 Post-Cranial Skeleton .................................................................................................17 Cytomorphology ...........................................................................................................18 Biochemistry ...............................................................................................................19 Karyotype ...............................................................................................................19 Table of Contents v Chapter 2: Distribution ....................................................................................................21 Total Area .......................................................................................................................21 Differential Distribution ......................................................................................................24 Hatchlings ..................................................................................................................24 Juveniles and Subadults ..................................................................................................24 Adults ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������24 Determinants of Distributional Changes ...................................................................................25 Hybridization �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������25 Chapter 3: Bionomics and Life History ...............................................................................26 Reproduction ...................................................................................................................26 Sexual Dimorphism .......................................................................................................26 Age at Maturity ............................................................................................................26 Courtship and Mating .....................................................................................................27 Nesting Behavior ..........................................................................................................28 Emergence from the sea onto the nesting beach ..................................................................28 Overland traverse to and selection of a suitable nest site .......................................................29 Excavation of a body pit ..............................................................................................30 Excavation of the nest chamber .....................................................................................30 Oviposition ..............................................................................................................30 Filling the nest .........................................................................................................30 Covering and concealing the nest site ..............................................................................30
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of Southern Iraq Herpetofauna
    Vol. 3 (1): 61-71, 2019 A Review of Southern Iraq Herpetofauna Nadir A. Salman Mazaya University College, Dhi Qar, Iraq *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: The present review discussed the species diversity of herpetofauna in southern Iraq due to their scientific and national interests. The review includes a historical record for the herpetofaunal studies in Iraq since the earlier investigations of the 1920s and 1950s along with the more recent taxonomic trials in the following years. It appeared that, little is known about Iraqi herpetofauna, and no comprehensive checklist has been done for these species. So far, 96 species of reptiles and amphibians have been recorded from Iraq, but only a relatively small proportion of them occur in the southern marshes. The marshes act as key habitat for globally endangered species and as a potential for as yet unexplored amphibian and reptile diversity. Despite the lack of precise localities, the tree frog Hyla savignyi, the marsh frog Pelophylax ridibunda and the green toad Bufo viridis are found in the marshes. Common reptiles in the marshes include the Caspian terrapin (Clemmys caspia), the soft-shell turtle (Trionyx euphraticus), the Euphrates softshell turtle (Rafetus euphraticus), geckos of the genus Hemidactylus, two species of skinks (Trachylepis aurata and Mabuya vittata) and a variety of snakes of the genus Coluber, the spotted sand boa (Eryx jaculus), tessellated water snake (Natrix tessellata) and Gray's desert racer (Coluber ventromaculatus). More recently, a new record for the keeled gecko, Cyrtopodion scabrum and the saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus sochureki) was reported. The IUCN Red List includes six terrestrial and six aquatic amphibian species.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Community Structure of Pelagic Cnidarians in the Celebes and Sulu Seas, Southeast Asian Tropical Marginal Seas
    Deep-Sea Research I 100 (2015) 54–63 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Deep-Sea Research I journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsri Diversity and community structure of pelagic cnidarians in the Celebes and Sulu Seas, southeast Asian tropical marginal seas Mary M. Grossmann a,n, Jun Nishikawa b, Dhugal J. Lindsay c a Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Tancha 1919-1, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan b Tokai University, 3-20-1, Orido, Shimizu, Shizuoka 424-8610, Japan c Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan article info abstract Article history: The Sulu Sea is a semi-isolated, marginal basin surrounded by high sills that greatly reduce water inflow Received 13 September 2014 at mesopelagic depths. For this reason, the entire water column below 400 m is stable and homogeneous Received in revised form with respect to salinity (ca. 34.00) and temperature (ca. 10 1C). The neighbouring Celebes Sea is more 19 January 2015 open, and highly influenced by Pacific waters at comparable depths. The abundance, diversity, and Accepted 1 February 2015 community structure of pelagic cnidarians was investigated in both seas in February 2000. Cnidarian Available online 19 February 2015 abundance was similar in both sampling locations, but species diversity was lower in the Sulu Sea, Keywords: especially at mesopelagic depths. At the surface, the cnidarian community was similar in both Tropical marginal seas, but, at depth, community structure was dependent first on sampling location Marginal sea and then on depth within each Sea. Cnidarians showed different patterns of dominance at the two Sill sampling locations, with Sulu Sea communities often dominated by species that are rare elsewhere in Pelagic cnidarians fi Community structure the Indo-Paci c.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Cranial Skeleton of Eosphargis Breineri NIELSEN
    On the post-cranial skeleton of Eosphargis breineri NIELSEN. By EIGIL NIELSEN CONTENTS Preface 281 Introduction 282 Eosphargis breineri NIELSEN 283 Material and locality 283 Measurements 283 Skull 284 Vertebral column 284 Carapace 284 Plastron .291 Shoulder girdle 294 Fore-limb 296 Pelvis 303 Hind-limb 307 Remnants of soft tissues 308 Remarks on the relationship of Eosphargis 308 Literature 313 Plates 314 Preface. From the outstanding collector of fossils from the Lower Eocene marine mo clay deposits in Northern Jutland, Mr. M. BREINER JENSEN, leader of the Fur museum, I have received both in 1959 and 1960 for investiga- tion further remnants of turtles from the locality at Knudeklint on the island of Fur, where Mr. BREINEB. JENSEN in 1957 collected the almost complete skull of Eosphargis breineri NIELSEN described by me in 1959. I owe Mr. BREINER JENSEN a sincere thank for the permission to investigate also this new important material, the tedious preparation of which has been carried out in the laboratory of vertebrate paleontology in the Mineralogical and Geological Museum of the University of Copen- hagen mainly by stud. mag. BENTE SOLTAU, who also is responsible for the photographs in this paper. I hereby thank Mrs SOLTAU for her carefull work. Moreover I thank the artists Mrs BETTY ENGHOLM and Mrs RAGNA LARSEN who have drawn the text-figures, as well as stud. mag. SVEND 21 282 EIGIL NIELSEN : On the post-cranial skeleton of Eosphargis breineri NIELSEN E. B.-ALMGREEN, who in various ways has assisted in the finishing the illustrations. To the CARLSBERG FOUNDATION my thanks are due for financial support to the work of preparation and illustration of the material and to the RASK ØRSTED FOUNDATION for financial support to the reproduction of the illustrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Sea Turtle in the New England Aquarium Has Been in Captivity Since 1970, and Is Believed to Be Around 80 Years Old (NEAQ 2013)
    Species Status Assessment Class: Reptilia Family: Cheloniidae Scientific Name: Chelonia mydas Common Name: Green turtle Species synopsis: The green turtle is a marine turtle that was originally described by Linnaeus in 1758 as Testudo mydas. In 1868 Marie Firmin Bocourt named a new species of sea turtle Chelonia agassizii. It was later determined that these represented the same species, and the name became Chelonia mydas. In New York, the green turtle can be found from July – November, with individuals occasionally found cold-stunned in the winter months (Berry et al. 1997, Morreale and Standora 1998). Green turtles are sighted most frequently in association with sea grass beds off the eastern side of Long Island. They are observed with some regularity in the Peconic Estuary (Morreale and Standora 1998). Green turtles experienced a drastic decline throughout their range during the 19th and 20th centuries as a result of human exploitation and anthropogenic habitat degradation (NMFS and USFWS 1991). In recent years, some populations, including the Florida nesting population, have been experiencing some signs of increase (NMFS and USFWS 2007). Trends have not been analyzed in New York; a mark-recapture study performed in the state from 1987 – 1992 found that there seemed to be more green turtles at the end of the study period (Berry et al. 1997). However, changes in temperature have lead to an increase in the number of cold stunned green turtles in recent years (NMFS, Riverhead Foundation). Also, this year a record number of nests were observed at nesting beaches in Flordia (Mote Marine Laboratory 2013). 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • General Index
    General Index Italicized page numbers indicate figures and tables. Color plates are in- cussed; full listings of authors’ works as cited in this volume may be dicated as “pl.” Color plates 1– 40 are in part 1 and plates 41–80 are found in the bibliographical index. in part 2. Authors are listed only when their ideas or works are dis- Aa, Pieter van der (1659–1733), 1338 of military cartography, 971 934 –39; Genoa, 864 –65; Low Coun- Aa River, pl.61, 1523 of nautical charts, 1069, 1424 tries, 1257 Aachen, 1241 printing’s impact on, 607–8 of Dutch hamlets, 1264 Abate, Agostino, 857–58, 864 –65 role of sources in, 66 –67 ecclesiastical subdivisions in, 1090, 1091 Abbeys. See also Cartularies; Monasteries of Russian maps, 1873 of forests, 50 maps: property, 50–51; water system, 43 standards of, 7 German maps in context of, 1224, 1225 plans: juridical uses of, pl.61, 1523–24, studies of, 505–8, 1258 n.53 map consciousness in, 636, 661–62 1525; Wildmore Fen (in psalter), 43– 44 of surveys, 505–8, 708, 1435–36 maps in: cadastral (See Cadastral maps); Abbreviations, 1897, 1899 of town models, 489 central Italy, 909–15; characteristics of, Abreu, Lisuarte de, 1019 Acequia Imperial de Aragón, 507 874 –75, 880 –82; coloring of, 1499, Abruzzi River, 547, 570 Acerra, 951 1588; East-Central Europe, 1806, 1808; Absolutism, 831, 833, 835–36 Ackerman, James S., 427 n.2 England, 50 –51, 1595, 1599, 1603, See also Sovereigns and monarchs Aconcio, Jacopo (d. 1566), 1611 1615, 1629, 1720; France, 1497–1500, Abstraction Acosta, José de (1539–1600), 1235 1501; humanism linked to, 909–10; in- in bird’s-eye views, 688 Acquaviva, Andrea Matteo (d.
    [Show full text]
  • Chester County Marriages Bride Index 1885-1930
    Chester County Marriages Bride Index 1885-1930 Bride's Last Name Bride's First Name Bride's Middle Bride's Date of Birth Bride's Age Groom's First Groom's Last Date of Application Date of Marriage Place of Marriage License # Dabney Ruth 47 Arthur Garner October 16, 1929 West Chester 29675 Dabundo Louise 18 Saverio DiMaio December 10, 1925 West Chester 26115.5 Dadley Fannie K 23 Albert Smith April 12, 1916 Toughkenamon 19118 Dagastina LorenzaFebruary 6, 1889 Michele Mastragiolo March 16, 1908 Norristown 13663 Dagne Eva EJuly 8, 1874 Jesse Downs December 27, 1899 West Chester 7490 Dagostina Philomena 18 Nicholas Tuscano August 2, 1925 Phoenixville 25847 D'Agostino Angelina 28 Gabriele Natale April 19, 1915 Norristown 18401 Dague Anna LSeptember 23, 1884 James Porter December 18, 1907 Parkesburg 13097 Dague CoraNovember 10, 1874 Vernon Powell February 10, 1904 Lionville 10244 Dague Lillie AApril 27, 1873 Frederick Gottier April 7, 1902 West Chester 9034 Dague M KatieJanuary 1, 1872 Charles Gantt April 17, 1900 Downington 7673 Dague Mary J 29 Ralph Young March 5, 1921 Coatesville 22856 Dague Sara Ellen 36 Rees Helms October 4, 1922 Honey Brook 23933 Dague Sarah Emma1858 James Eppihimer January 14, 1886 West Chester 104 Dahl Olga G 23 Claude Prettyman January 24, 1925 West Chester 25559 Dahms Elsie Annie 26 Chester Kirkhoff October 31, 1929 Pottstown 29710 Dailey Agnes1859 John McCarthy January 13, 1886 West Chester 084 Dailey Anna 19 Rhinehart Merkt August 14, 1913 Downingtown 17216 Dailey Anna RApril 29, 1877 18 Thomas Argne January 4, 1896
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Tortoise (Testudo Kleinmanni)
    EAZA Reptile Taxon Advisory Group Best Practice Guidelines for the Egyptian tortoise (Testudo kleinmanni) First edition, May 2019 Editors: Mark de Boer, Lotte Jansen & Job Stumpel EAZA Reptile TAG chair: Ivan Rehak, Prague Zoo. EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Egyptian tortoise (Testudo kleinmanni) EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (May 2019) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA Reptile TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation. EAZA Preamble Right from the very beginning it has been the concern of EAZA and the EEPs to encourage and promote the highest possible standards for husbandry of zoo and aquarium animals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenomic Analysis of Turtles ⇑ Nicholas G
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 83 (2015) 250–257 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A phylogenomic analysis of turtles ⇑ Nicholas G. Crawford a,b,1, James F. Parham c, ,1, Anna B. Sellas a, Brant C. Faircloth d, Travis C. Glenn e, Theodore J. Papenfuss f, James B. Henderson a, Madison H. Hansen a,g, W. Brian Simison a a Center for Comparative Genomics, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA b Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA c John D. Cooper Archaeological and Paleontological Center, Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA d Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA e Department of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA f Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA g Mathematical and Computational Biology Department, Harvey Mudd College, 301 Platt Boulevard, Claremont, CA 9171, USA article info abstract Article history: Molecular analyses of turtle relationships have overturned prevailing morphological hypotheses and Received 11 July 2014 prompted the development of a new taxonomy. Here we provide the first genome-scale analysis of turtle Revised 16 October 2014 phylogeny. We sequenced 2381 ultraconserved element (UCE) loci representing a total of 1,718,154 bp of Accepted 28 October 2014 aligned sequence. Our sampling includes 32 turtle taxa representing all 14 recognized turtle families and Available online 4 November 2014 an additional six outgroups. Maximum likelihood, Bayesian, and species tree methods produce a single resolved phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • A Divergence Dating Analysis of Turtles Using Fossil Calibrations: an Example of Best Practices Walter G
    Journal of Paleontology, 87(4), 2013, p. 612–634 Copyright Ó 2013, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/13/0087-612$03.00 DOI: 10.1666/12-149 A DIVERGENCE DATING ANALYSIS OF TURTLES USING FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS: AN EXAMPLE OF BEST PRACTICES WALTER G. JOYCE,1,2 JAMES F. PARHAM,3 TYLER R. LYSON,2,4,5 RACHEL C. M. WARNOCK,6,7 7 AND PHILIP C. J. DONOGHUE 1Institut fu¨r Geowissenschaften, University of Tu¨bingen, 72076 Tu¨bingen, Germany, ,[email protected].; 2Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; 3John D. Cooper Archaeological and Paleontological Center, Department of Geological Sciences, California State University at Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA; 4Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20013, USA; 5Marmarth Research Foundation, Marmarth, ND 58643, USA; 6National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA; and 7Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ABSTRACT—Turtles have served as a model system for molecular divergence dating studies using fossil calibrations. However, because some parts of the fossil record of turtles are very well known, divergence age estimates from molecular phylogenies often do not differ greatly from those observed directly from the fossil record alone. Also, the phylogenetic position and age of turtle fossil calibrations used in previous studies have not been adequately justified. We provide the first explicitly justified minimum and soft maximum age constraints on 22 clades of turtles following best practice protocols. Using these data we undertook a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock analysis establishing a timescale for the evolution of crown Testudines that we exploit in attempting to address evolutionary questions that cannot be resolved with fossils alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Membros Da Comissão Julgadora Da Dissertação
    UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, CIÊNCIAS E LETRAS DE RIBEIRÃO PRETO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA COMPARADA Evolution of the skull shape in extinct and extant turtles Evolução da forma do crânio em tartarugas extintas e viventes Guilherme Hermanson Souza Dissertação apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, como parte das exigências para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências, obtido no Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biologia Comparada Ribeirão Preto - SP 2021 UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, CIÊNCIAS E LETRAS DE RIBEIRÃO PRETO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA COMPARADA Evolution of the skull shape in extinct and extant turtles Evolução da forma do crânio em tartarugas extintas e viventes Guilherme Hermanson Souza Dissertação apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, como parte das exigências para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências, obtido no Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biologia Comparada. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Max Cardoso Langer Ribeirão Preto - SP 2021 Autorizo a reprodução e divulgação total ou parcial deste trabalho, por qualquer meio convencional ou eletrônico, para fins de estudo e pesquisa, desde que citada a fonte. I authorise the reproduction and total or partial disclosure of this work, via any conventional or electronic medium, for aims of study and research, with the condition that the source is cited. FICHA CATALOGRÁFICA Hermanson, Guilherme Evolution of the skull shape in extinct and extant turtles, 2021. 132 páginas. Dissertação de Mestrado, apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto/USP – Área de concentração: Biologia Comparada.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidad Nacional Del Comahue Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche
    Universidad Nacional del Comahue Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche Título de la Tesis Microanatomía y osteohistología del caparazón de los Testudinata del Mesozoico y Cenozoico de Argentina: Aspectos sistemáticos y paleoecológicos implicados Trabajo de Tesis para optar al Título de Doctor en Biología Tesista: Lic. en Ciencias Biológicas Juan Marcos Jannello Director: Dr. Ignacio A. Cerda Co-director: Dr. Marcelo S. de la Fuente 2018 Tesis Doctoral UNCo J. Marcos Jannello 2018 Resumen Las inusuales estructuras óseas observadas entre los vertebrados, como el cuello largo de la jirafa o el cráneo en forma de T del tiburón martillo, han interesado a los científicos desde hace mucho tiempo. Uno de estos casos es el clado Testudinata el cual representa uno de los grupos más fascinantes y enigmáticos conocidos entre de los amniotas. Su inconfundible plan corporal, que ha persistido desde el Triásico tardío hasta la actualidad, se caracteriza por la presencia del caparazón, el cual encierra a las cinturas, tanto pectoral como pélvica, dentro de la caja torácica desarrollada. Esta estructura les ha permitido a las tortugas adaptarse con éxito a diversos ambientes (por ejemplo, terrestres, acuáticos continentales, marinos costeros e incluso marinos pelágicos). Su capacidad para habitar diferentes nichos ecológicos, su importante diversidad taxonómica y su plan corporal particular hacen de los Testudinata un modelo de estudio muy atrayente dentro de los vertebrados. Una disciplina que ha demostrado ser una herramienta muy importante para abordar varios temas relacionados al caparazón de las tortugas, es la paleohistología. Esta disciplina se ha involucrado en temas diversos tales como el origen del caparazón, el origen del desarrollo y mantenimiento de la ornamentación, la paleoecología y la sistemática.
    [Show full text]
  • Osseous Growth and Skeletochronology
    Comparative Ontogenetic 2 and Phylogenetic Aspects of Chelonian Chondro- Osseous Growth and Skeletochronology Melissa L. Snover and Anders G.J. Rhodin CONTENTS 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 17 2.2 Skeletochronology in Turtles ................................................................................................ 18 2.2.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 18 2.2.1.1 Validating Annual Deposition of LAGs .......................................................20 2.2.1.2 Resorption of LAGs .....................................................................................20 2.2.1.3 Skeletochronology and Growth Lines on Scutes ......................................... 21 2.2.2 Application of Skeletochronology to Turtles ............................................................. 21 2.2.2.1 Freshwater Turtles ........................................................................................ 21 2.2.2.2 Terrestrial Turtles ......................................................................................... 21 2.2.2.3 Marine Turtles .............................................................................................. 21 2.3 Comparative Chondro-Osseous Development in Turtles......................................................22 2.3.1 Implications for Phylogeny ........................................................................................32
    [Show full text]