DOCSLIB.ORG

Presentation and Approval of a Resolution Adopting the SJRRC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Presentation and Approval of a Resolution Adopting the SJRRC San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission July 2, 2020 Special Board Meeting ITEM 1 Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Roll Call ITEM 2 Public Comments Please use the GoToMeeting chat function to alert staff if you wish to make a Public Comment. Alternatively, you can write in your public comment to [email protected] and staff will read the comment aloud. Please keep public comments to 240 words or two minutes. 3.1 Minutes of SJRRC Board Meeting June 5, 2020 3.2 Rail Commission/ACE Monthly Expenditure 3.3 ACE Monthly Fare Revenue ITEM 3 3.4 ACE Ridership Consent Calendar 3.5 ACE On-Time Performance 3.6 Update on Positive Train Control 3.7 Washington Update ITEM 4 Public Hearing: Presentation and Approval of a Resolution Adopting the SJRRC/ACE Combined Fiscal Year 2020/2021 Work Program and Operating Budget in the amount of $23,334,425, the SJJPA Fiscal Year 2020/2021 Work Program and Operating Budget of $65,862,796 and a Combined Capital Budget in the amount of $89,848,794 (Brian Schmidt/Kevin Sheridan) CURRENT YEAR HIGHLIGHTS . ACE carried over 1.05 million passengers and was on pace for a record ridership year until the COVID-19 Stay at Home Orders went into effect. Saturday Service was introduced in September 2019. Suspended due to COVID-19. Positive Train Control was initiated in December 2019 on the Caltrain Corridor. ACE is currently fully interoperable with both Host Railroads ahead of the December 31, 2020 deadline. 17 Passenger Rail Cars were procured, with delivery scheduled to begin in November 2021 through March 2022. Four (4) new Tier IV Siemens locomotives were delivered and put in Operation. 2020/2021 OPERATING BUDGET . Costs for the 2020/2021 Budget reflect the operation of two (2) roundtrips, including Shuttle Services . However, all associated operating agreements being brought before the Board are for a full 4 train schedule to allow for seamless Service restoration. Enhanced cleaning and disinfecting procedures continue on the equipment to ensure passenger safety. Planning and Valley Rail Service Expansion activities are not affected and continue to move forward. 2020/2021 OPERATING BUDGET . Implemented cost reduction strategies beyond service-related expenses, including: . Employee travel . Office supplies . Ticketing services . Workforce transition from daily maintenance to Capital Overhaul . New Revenue Work Strategies: . Equipment maintenance services for Caltrans-owned rail equipment. These agreements include funding for Staff as well and Herzog. Modifications to oldest ACE locomotives into cab or alternative power cars. When ridership increases to a point where social distancing is not possible with the current two trains operating 10 cars each (High on-board count of 450 riders), Staff will bring back a service restoration plan for increasing service levels and a request for additional funding for the increased service level. PROJECT MANAGEMENT, SERVICES, & SUPPLIES PROJECT MANAGEMENT, SERVICES, & SUPPLIES . Salaries/Benefits/contracted Help: -19% . Vacant Positions . Computer Systems : -32% . FY 19/20: PC Desktop and Server updates . Transportation & Travel : -38% . Travel reduced due to COVID-19; in-person meetings now via teleconference . Professional Service Legal : 7% . Legal Services pertaining to Capital Projects and ACE Expansion CONTRACTED AND SHUTTLE SERVICES CONTRACTED AND SHUTTLE SERVICES . Reduced 50% or more due to reduction in service from FY19/20: • Consumables • Operation Leases: Rail Car Storage at Tamien Yard • Fuel • Ticketing Services • Communication Ops • Emergency Ride Homes . Insurance : 14% . Renewed March 2020 . Wi-Fi : 32% . New Wi-Fi system OPERATING REVENUE 2020/2021 CAPITAL BUDGET .Capital Budget = $89,848,794 .Unchanged from June presentation .Revenue sources include: . Senate Bill (SB-) 132 . Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) . State Rail Assistance (SRA) . Federal 5307, 5337, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) . Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) . Measure K Smart Growth 2020/2021 CAPITAL PROJECTS – ACE/SJRRC .Included in the Capital Budget are a number of multi-year, multi-phase projects, including: .Stockton Diamond Grade Separation .ACE Extension – Stockton to Natomas .ACE Extension – Lathrop to Ceres/Merced .Rail Car Purchase .Platform Extensions Projects .Robert J. Cabral Station Expansion .Railcar Midlife Overhaul .Cabral Station Track Extension .East Channel Street Improvements .Tracy ACE Station Improvements 2020/2021 CAPITAL PROJECTS – SJJPA .The Draft Capital Budget also includes SJJPA projects, contributing funding to: .Madera Station Relocation .Stockton Wye .Oakley Station Platform .Network Integration Planning .Safety & Security Projects throughout the San Joaquins Corridor .Fencing and security improvements at Western Pacific Depot RECOMMENDATION . Recommendation: . Approve of a Resolution Adopting the SJRRC/ACE Combined Fiscal Year 2020/2021 Work Program and Operating Budget in the amount of $23,334,425, the SJJPA Fiscal Year 2020/2021 Work Program and Operating Budget of $65,862,796 and a Combined Capital Budget in the amount of $89,848,794 ITEM 5 Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Approving Agreements for Shuttle Services for the Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Service for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and Authorizing the Executive Director to Execute Any and All Documents Needed with the Following Agencies: a. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority $990,157 b. Livermore-Amador Valley Transportation Authority $202,408 c. Contra Costa County Transportation Authority $131,395 (Brian Schmidt) BACKGROUND . Shuttle services for the Altamont Corridor Express began with the start of train service in October 1998. The ACE shuttles provide an essential transit link by directly connecting passengers to employers, business parks and other transit modes such as BART. Passengers with a valid ACE ticket are entitled to use the shuttle services free of charge. The Agreements also provide for missed transit connections and alternate service options in case of an emergency (Bus Bridges). On April 6, 2020 the ACE Service decreased to two round-trips due to the COVID-19 pandemic. All shuttle partners continued to provide service for passengers. BACKGROUND . During full-service Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) uses a mixture of transit buses and shuttle vans to provide service on eight (8) routes connecting with the ACE trains at the Santa Clara Great America Station. The VTA shuttle buses transport approximately 33% of total ACE ridership to major employment sites in the Silicon Valley. The projected total operating cost for full service is $1,934,171 for FY 20/21. The ACE service portion of this cost is $990,157 (51%). Until full service is back in operation, the cost for service is based on per revenue hour in service. The estimated amount for two roundtrips per month is $495,079. The estimated amount for three roundtrips per month is $742,618. BACKGROUND . During full-service the Livermore-Amador Transportation Authority (LAVTA) operates two routes for the ACE service: Route 54, serves as the ACE shuttle from the Pleasanton ACE station to Bernal Business Park, Hacienda Business Park, Carr America and the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and Route 53 is a BART express bus. The bus leaves the Pleasanton ACE Station and goes directly via the highway to West Dublin BART station. The bus also serves the employment centers surrounding Stoneridge Mall. The FY 20/21 operating cost for full service is $337,347. The ACE service portion of this cost is $202,408 (60%). Until full service is back in operation, the cost for service is based on per revenue hour in service and ridership. The estimated amount for two roundtrips per month is $101,204. The estimated amount for three roundtrips per month is $151,806. BACKGROUND . During full-service, the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority operates three buses for the ACE service. The routes serve Bishop Ranch and the San Ramon Transit Center from the Pleasanton Station. The FY 20/21 cost for these services is $292,013. The ACE service portion cost is $131,395 (45%). Until full service is back in operation, the cost for service is based on per mile and per revenue hour in service. The estimated amount for two roundtrips per month is $65,698. The estimated amount for three roundtrips per month is $98,547. BACKGROUND . SJRRC only pays for the actual shuttle services provided for the three (3) agreements. Actual costs for the foreseeable future will continue to be lower than the approved amount as long as service remains at the two (2) train level. Approving the higher contract amount allows for a seamless restoration of Service without have to go back to the three agencies for contract amendments for the added services. FISCAL IMPACT & RECOMMENDATION . Fiscal Impact: . Expenses and Revenues for shuttle services are identified in the Fiscal Year 2020/2021 ACE Shuttle Services budget. Recommendation: . Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Approving Agreements for Shuttle Services for the Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Service for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and Authorizing the Executive Director to Execute Any and All Documents Needed with the Following Agencies: a. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority $990,157 b. Livermore-Amador Valley Transportation Authority $202,408 c. Contra Costa County Transportation Authority $131,395 ITEM
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    ACE train time schedule & line map San Jose View In Website Mode The ACE train line (San Jose) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) San Jose: 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM (2) Stockton: 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest ACE train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next ACE train arriving. Direction: San Jose ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops San Jose Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Stockton Station 949 Channel St, Stockton Tuesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Lathrop/Manteca Station Wednesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Tracy Station Thursday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Friday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Vasco Road Station South Vasco Road, Livermore Saturday Not Operational Livermore Station Pleasanton Station 403 Old Bernal Av, Pleasanton ACE train Info Direction: San Jose Fremont Station Stops: 10 37275 Fremont Bl, Fremont Trip Duration: 132 min Line Summary: Stockton Station, Lathrop/Manteca Great America Station Station, Tracy Station, Vasco Road Station, West Tasman Drive, Santa Clara Livermore Station, Pleasanton Station, Fremont Station, Great America Station, Santa Clara Station, Santa Clara Station San Jose Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara San Jose Station Direction: Stockton ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops Stockton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM San Jose Station Tuesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Santa Clara Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara Wednesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Great America Station Thursday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM
    [Show full text]
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor
    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda I 680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan
    Alameda I-680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F 6-1-2020 6/24/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltrans Policy Development .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Senate Bill 1 and the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program ..................................................... 1 1.3 Document Structure............................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Stakeholders ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2: Corridor Goals, Objectives and Performance Metrics ................................................................ 3 Chapter 3: Corridor Overview ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Corridor Limits .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Route Significance ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Agenda Packet
    LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1362 Rutan Court, Suite 100 Livermore, CA 94551 PROJECTS and SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING / COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE MEMBERS DAVID HAUBERT – CHAIR JEAN JOSEY – VICE CHAIR KARLA BROWN BOB WOERNER Agenda Questions: Please call the Executive Director at (925) 455-7564 or send an email to [email protected] Documents received after publication of the Agenda and considered by the P&S Committee in its deliberation will be available for inspection only via electronic document transfer, due to the COVID-19 outbreak. See the COVID-19 provisions outlined below. Please call or email the Executive Director during normal business hours if you require access to any such documents. TELECONFERENCE MAY 24, 2021 – 4:00 PM CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) ADVISORY AND MEETING PROCEDURE On June 5, 2020 (updated June 18, 2020), the Health Officer of Alameda County issued an Order that will continue to be in effect until it is rescinded, superseded, or amended in writing by the Health Officer. The Order directed that all individuals living in the county to shelter at their place of residence except that they may leave to provide or receive certain essential services or engage in certain essential activities and work for essential businesses and governmental services. Under the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, this meeting may utilize teleconferencing. As a precaution to protect the health and safety of staff, officials, and the general public. Councilmembers will not be physically in attendance, but will be available via video conference. The administrative office of Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) is currently closed to the public and will remain closed for the duration of the Project & Services (P&S) Committee meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report
    Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report May 20, 2021 ES-1 Final Report Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report Prepared by Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) May 20, 2021 Executive Summary The 2018 California State Rail Plan envisions a network of high-speed, intercity corridor, and commuter trains integrated with local transit, providing nearly seamless connections for riders seeking to reach all parts of the state. In corridors where no trains operate, the Rail Plan calls for express buses using the existing highway systems to provide access to the state’s rail system. The Rail Plan identified the I-680 corridor between the Tri-Valley area (i.e. Dublin, Pleasanton, and Livermore) and Suisun City as one such corridor, where express buses could link a Tri-Valley Transit Hub with the Suisun-Fairfield Amtrak Station, a stop for the Capitol Corridor trains. This Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study is an effort to define what such express bus service would be: its route, stops, connections with corridor and commuter trains, as well as its likely ridership, revenue, and costs for implementation. The study investigates the BART Dublin/Pleasanton BART station as a candidate for the Tri-Valley Transit Hub, along with potential improvements that could make the facility easier, safer, and more comfortable for riders to use. The study also explores options to better connect northern San Joaquin County communities with the Tri-Valley Hub. The distance between the Suisun Amtrak Station and the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station is 53 miles, inclusive of a stop at the Martinez Amtrak Station.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.7.3 Project Environmental Impact Report
    Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction The Tri-Valley–San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority (Authority) is proposing the Valley Link Project, which is being evaluated on a project level in this Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR). This chapter provides a brief overview of the Proposed Project and alternatives; the Project goals and objectives; Project background and context; an overview of the environmental review process; and the scope, content, and organization of the Draft EIR. Figure 1-1. Valley Link Project Geographic Segments 1.2 Project Overview 1.2.1 Proposed Project The Proposed Project is a new 42-mile, 7-station passenger rail project that will connect the existing Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station in Alameda County to the approved Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) North Lathrop Station in San Joaquin County (Figure 1-1). Valley Link will use existing transportation corridors: the existing Interstate (I-) 580 corridor (11.7 miles) in the Tri-Valley; the Alameda County Transportation Corridor right-of-way (ROW) through the Altamont Pass (14.5 miles); and the existing Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Corridor (16.1 miles) in Northern San Joaquin County. The Proposed Project includes the following stations: ⚫ Dublin/Pleasanton (BART Intermodal) Valley Link Draft EIR 1-1 December 2020 ICF 00004.19 Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Introduction ⚫ Isabel (Livermore) ⚫ Greenville (Livermore) ⚫ Mountain House (San Joaquin County) ⚫ Downtown Tracy Station (Tracy) ⚫ River Islands Station (Lathrop) ⚫ North Lathrop Station (ACE Intermodal) The Proposed Project also includes the proposed Tracy Operation and Maintenance Facility (OMF), which would be located in the City of Tracy.
    [Show full text]
  • New BART Service to Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Stations
    New BART Service to Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Stations Comments and Feedback Please answer the questions below. Your answers will help us evaluate how well we’re reaching the communities we serve. BART values your input. Information will be treated confidentially. USAGE OF BART (Optional) Do you have any comments on any of the options listed in questions 7-8? 1. Which BART station do you usually enter when making a trip from __________________________________________________________ your home (i.e., your “home” station)? __________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 2. At which BART station do you usually exit the system (i.e., your __________________________________________________________ “destination” station)? ____________________________________________________ PROPOSED BART FARES FOR MILPITAS AND BERRYESSA/NORTH SAN 3. What time of day do you typically use BART? Select all that apply. JOSÉ STATIONS Morning Afternoon Evening Late night 9. BART plans to extend its distance-based fare structure for 4. Do you plan to use the Milpitas and/or Berryessa/North San José Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Stations. For example, in Station? Select all that apply. 2018, a one-way trip to Embarcadero Station from Warm Yes, Milpitas Station Springs/South Fremont Station will cost $6.75, while a trip to Yes, Berryessa/North San José Station Embarcadero Station from Milpitas Station is estimated to cost Neither, I plan to use: ___________________ $7.50 ($0.75 more), and from Berryessa/North San José Station, $7.75 ($1.00 more). Do you have any general comments about 5. How will you access the Milpitas and/or Berryessa/North San José BART’s proposed fares for Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Station? Select all that apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Dublin/ Pleasanton Station
    Transit For more detailed information about BART Information service, please see the BART schedule, MODESTO AREA EXPRESS BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. 4K DP Dublin/ San Francisco Bay Area Schedule Information e ective March 22, 2021 Amtrak Thruway bus service County Connection (CCCTA) Schedule Information e ective October 4, 2020 Modesto Area Express (MAX) San Joaquin RTD is the regional is a system of intercity coaches, provides xed-route bus and is the primary bus agency for transit provider for San Joaquin Rapid Transit (BART) rail Check before you go: up-to-date schedules are service connects the San locally-contracted transit buses, paratransit services throughout Modesto. The agency provides County and provides public Pleasanton available on www.bart.gov and the offi cial BART app. Route 35 Route 97X Route 335 Francisco Peninsula with through-ticketed local bus routes, Central Contra Costa County. For regular transit and dial-a-ride local transit services in the Stockton Overhead real-time displays can be found on station and taxi services that provides passengers more information call 925-676-7500 service in addition to commuter feeder Metropolitan Area, as well as intercity, Oakland, Berkeley, Berryessa, to to to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, platforms. A reference guide to transfer information of Amtrak’s rail service with connecting or visit www.countyconnection.com service to several regional rail systems: interregional, and rural transit services Station San Ramon TC/ San Ramon TC/ San Ramon TC/ BART, ACE, and Amtrak’s San Joaquin train. countywide. and other cities in the East Bay, as for trains without direct service is shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum 5.1 11
    Memorandum 5.1 11 DATE: September 4, 2020 TO: Planning, Policy and Legislation Committee FROM: Tess Lengyel, Executive Director Carolyn Clevenger, Deputy Executive Director of Planning and Policy SUBJECT: Approve Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Request for a 2014 Measure BB Transportation Expenditure Plan Amendment Recommendation It is recommended that the Commission approve the Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority (TVSJVRRA) request (Attachment A) for an amendment to the 2014 Measure BB Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) to: 1) acknowledge TVSJVRRA as a new agency in Alameda County that can be an eligible recipient of Measure BB funds; 2) remove the BART to Livermore project and associated $400 million Measure BB funding; 3) add Valley Link in Alameda County project with $400 million in Measure BB funding; and 4) make associated technical amendments. The Commission Plan Amendment Resolution recommended for approval is included as Attachment B and the proposed 2014 Measure BB Expenditure Plan redline markups and technical amendments are detailed in Attachment C. This is an action item and requires majority approval at the Planning, Policy and Legislation Committee (PPLC) and 2/3 of the Authorized vote for approval at the Commission meeting per the Implementing Guidelines of the 2014 TEP. Summary The 2014 Measure BB TEP included $400 million for BART to Livermore. Since that time, a significant number of developments have occurred on the project and in the project area, as detailed in the Project Background section of this memo. The TVSJVRRA was created by the State Legislature in 2017 by Assembly Bill 758 for the purposes of planning, developing and delivering cost-effective and responsive transit connectivity between BART and commuter rail service in the Tri-Valley and San Joaquin County that reflects regional consensus and meets the goals and objectives of the San Joaquin Valley and Tri- Valley communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Mineta Transportation Institute Publications 5-2019 Value Capture to Fund Public Transportation: The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA Shishir Mathur San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Shishir Mathur. "Value Capture to Fund Public Transportation: The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA" Mineta Transportation Institute Publications (2019). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mineta Transportation Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Project 1714 May 2019 Value Capture to Fund Public Transportation: The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA Shishir Mathur, Ph.D. MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE transweb.sjsu.edu MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF Hon. Norman Y. Mineta Mineta Consortium for Transportation Mobility MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES Founded in 1991, the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI), an organized research and training unit in partnership with the Founder, Honorable Norman Richard Anderson (Ex-Officio) Steve Heminger* (TE 2018) Dan Smith (TE 2020) Lucas College and Graduate School of Business at San José State University (SJSU), increases mobility for all by improving the safety, Mineta (Ex-Officio) President and CEO Executive Director President Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Metropolitan Transportation Capstone Financial Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Teleconference Special Board Meeting
    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Debby Moorhead, City of Manteca Commissioner, Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Commissioner, Doug Kuehne, City of Lodi Commissioner, John Marchand, City of Livermore Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE SPECIAL BOARD MEETING Call-In Information: 1 (408) 650-3123 Conference Access Code: 254-860-229 GoToMeeting Link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-july-special-board-meeting SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing 1 (408) 650-3123 with access code: 254-860-229 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-july-special-board-meeting. Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Emailed public comments should be limited to approximately 240 words as comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment.
    [Show full text]