DOCSLIB.ORG

Citizens Advisory Committee AGENDA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Citizens Advisory Committee AGENDA P1 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Citizens Advisory Committee San Joaquin Council of Governments 555 East Weber Avenue, Stockton, California Wednesday, August 15, 2018 6:00 p.m. Citizens Advisory The San Joaquin Council of Governments is in compliance with the American with Committee Members Disabilities Act and will make all reasonable accommodations for the disabled to Leonard Smith (Chair) participate in employment, programs and facilities. Persons requiring assistance or CITY OF MANTECA auxiliary aid in order to participate should contact Rebecca Calija at 235-0600 at least 24 Paul Plathe (Vice Chair) hours prior to the meeting. SIERRA CLUB Richard Blackston Note: All items are available for action by the committee. The right hand column identifies CITY OF LODI staff recommendations. Stephanie Hobbs CITY OF RIPON AGENDA Michael Carouba BUSINESS INDUSTRY 1. Call to Order Jim Hilson CITY OF LATHROP 2. Minutes: Approve Minutes of June 20, 2018 ACTION Bobby Bivens SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 3. Public Comments Lauren Ah Tye LEAGUE OF WOMEN At this time the public may address the CAC on any non-agenda item that is within VOTERS the subject matter of this agency. A five-minute maximum time limit will apply to all Leonard Smith public comments. CITY OF MANTECA Gracie Marx CITY OF ESCALON 4. dibs Quarterly Activity Report: April – June, 2018 INFORMATION Eleassia Davis CITY OF TRACY 5. State Route 99/Turner Road Interchange ACTION Programming Recommendation LaCresia Hawkins NAACP 6. Tri-Valley San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority INFORMATION Rick Grewal CITY OF STOCKTON Update Albert Nunez TRUCKING INDUSTRY 7. Career Development and the Changing Workforce INFORMATION August 21 Speaker Series Event Marty Van Houten UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC 8. SJCOG Staff Update Vacant TRANSIT ADVOCATE 9. Updates / Requests from the Committee 10. Meeting Adjourned to Wednesday, September 19, 2018. SJCOG Andrew T. Chesley EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR P2 AGENDA ITEM 2 P3 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Citizens Advisory Committee 555 East Weber Ave. Stockton, CA 95202 Wednesday, June 20, 2018 ACTION MINUTES 1) Call to Order Chair Blackston called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Members Present: Richard Blackston (Chair), City of Lodi; Stephanie Hobbs (Vice Chair), City of Ripon; Gracie Marx, City of Escalon; Paul Plathe, Sierra Club; Leonard Smith, City of Manteca; Jim Hilson, City of Lathrop; Rick Grewal, City of Stockton; Michael Carouba, Business Industry; Marty Van Houten, University of the Pacific; Lauren Ah Tye, League of Women Voters; Carol Blevins, City of Tracy SJCOG Staff Present: Kim Anderson, Senior Regional Planner; David Ripperda, Associate Regional Planner; 2) Minutes: Approve Minutes of May 16, 2018 A motion was made and seconded (Marx/Smith) to approve the minutes of May 16, 2018. Motion passed, with Blevins abstaining. 3) Public Comments None. 4) Protecting SB 1 Mr. David Ripperda presented this item. He stated that SJCOG staff were recommending to support transportation funding from Senate Bill 1 and oppose the November 2018 ballot measure that would repeal it. Mr. Ripperda noted that the funding was constitutionally protected by the passage of Proposition 69 by the voters at the June 2018 Primary Election. Mr. Carouba arrived during this item. The committee members discussed their various viewpoints on Senate Bill 1 and discussed its merits. A motion was made and seconded (Bivens/Blevins) to reject staff recommendations and to support the repeal of Senate Bill 1. Motion failed (4-5-1). A motion was made and seconded (Hilson/Bivens) to take a neutral position on Senate Bill 1. Motion passed (6-4). P4 5) 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy and 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Ms. Kim Anderson presented this item. She described the purpose of the documents and the public review process that had occurred and described some of the comments that had been received. Ms. Anderson noted that the SJCOG Board would be taking action on the documents and the Air Quality Conformity Analysis document at their June 28, 2018 meeting. A motion was made and seconded (Van Houten/Smith) to approve the 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy and 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program. Motion passed (7-1-1), with Blevins against and Bivens abstaining. 6) Fiscal Year 2018/19 Unmet Transit Needs Findings Mr. Ripperda presented this item. He noted that the item was being brought back to the committee for action. Mr. Ripperda described the staff recommendations regarding the proposed weekend service to BART to be funded from surplus State Transit Assistance (STA) funding from the Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Service. Mr. Ripperda also described the proposed service between the Delta College Mountain House campus, Mountain House, and Tracy, and noted that SJCOG was still in discussions with Tracy and RTD regarding the service. A motion was made (Carouba/Blevins) to adopt the FY 18/19 UTN Report and Findings with the exception of the Intercity Service finding (Mountain House service). Motion passed 8-2 with Smith and Plathe dissenting. A motion was made (Carouba/Blevins) to adopt findings that the proposed Intercity Service finding (Mountain House service) was not an unmet transit need and that it was not reasonable to meet. Motion passed 8-2 with Smith and Plathe dissenting. A motion was made (Blevins/Van Houten) to allocate the $175,000 of 99313 STA funds for the Weekend Service to BART. Motion passed 9-0. A motion was made (Blevins/Van Houten) to support continued collaboration with RTD and Tracy, along with the addition of Mountain House CSD and Delta College, to develop a scope and funding strategy for service between Tracy, Mountain House, and Delta College. Motion passed 9-0. 7) Election of Chair and Vice-Chair for Fiscal Year 2018/19 The committee discussed candidates for the position of Chair and Vice-Chair, with Ms. Hobbs declining the position of Chair due to conflicts. A motion was made (Blackston/Hobbs) to appoint Mr. Smith as the Chair for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Motion passed unanimously. A motion was made (Blackston/Smith) to appoint Mr. Plathe as the Vice Chair for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Motion passed unanimously. P5 8) SJCOG Staff Update Mr. Ripperda reminded the committee that there would be no meeting in the month of July. 9) Committee Updates / Future Agenda Items Mr. Smith informed the committee of the pending groundbreaking ceremony of the Great Wolf Lodge development in Manteca. Chair Blackston requested a future update on the Tri-Valley San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority and their ACE to BART project. 11) Meeting Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:54 p.m. P6 AGENDA ITEM 4 P7 August 2018 CAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: dibs Quarterly Activity Report: April – June 2018 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Information SUMMARY: The dibs program provides information and encouragement to help people learn about and use travel options other than driving alone. These options include riding transit, carpooling, vanpooling and biking to work. This is accomplished by working directly with commuters, organizing community events, conducting employer outreach and partnering with local agencies. The attached report summarizes the activities that occurred to accomplish our mission. Highlights Include: Bike Month Feedback Preview dibs Donut Day for Amtrak Morning Express Train Merced Vanpool Project BACKGROUND Formerly known as Commute Connection, dibs were established in 1978 by SJCOG. The program was re-branded to dibs in 2016 to modernize the image, appeal to a wider audience and offer users a more engaging and convenient way to obtain information. Since inception, the program has expanded to include the counties of Stanislaus and Merced through contracts with the Stanislaus Council of Governments and Merced Association of Governments. As a result, through extensive marketing and outreach, the program has registered over 9,000 commuters. Ultimately, the dibs program aims to help improve air quality and reduce roadway congestion by encouraging commuters not to drive alone. Primary features of the program include: P8 Vanpool & Community Marketing Transit & Online Trip Emergency Outreach & & Park and Planning Ride Home Events Promotions Ride Incentives Prepared by: Yvette Davis, Sr. Program Specialist P9 Call dibs on our Program Success April - June 2018 Activity Report Bike Month Changes the Cycle We asked our riders what they enjoyed most about Bike Month and besides the expected “less traffic” and “the exercise”, we were surprised that a large chunk mentioned that seeing other riders out and about was their highlight of the month. Not only did they love seeing their coworkers and neighbors in the bike lanes with them, but they loved the Smart Travel option enough to keep it going after Bike Month, with 86% of riders continuing their habit! With the average rider logging just over 10 miles, it’s no wonder that they majority said they’re in it solely for the health benefits! “I believe what you are doing by putting others together to reduce our overall footprint on society is simply awesome.” -local rider, David. Hey thanks David, we think you guys are awesome too! Great job San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Merced counties! You did it! In the Works! • Development of the Bike to Work Results Infographic TOTAL TOTAL ALT. TRIPS DOLLARS CO2 MEMBERS VANPOOLS LOGGED SAVED SAVINGS 9,274 142 21,000 $241,561 172 TONS USER Social PAGEVIEWS 1,000,000 4% SESSIONS 800,000 Direct 20,568 43% 6,272 Referral 600,000 Organic 31% 400,000 23% 200,000 569,573 0 NEW RETURNING VISITORS VISITORS Organic = search engine/paid ads 86.8% 13.2% Statistics represent dibsmyway.com and dibstrips.com P10 April - June 2018 Activity Report dibsmyway.com Travel Smart with the Morning Express (and donuts!) Mornings up and down the Central Valley just got a whole lot more exciting with the launch of Amtrak’s Morning Express Train! The train will carry rail enthusiasts from as far south as Fresno up to Sacramento in time for work each day.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    ACE train time schedule & line map San Jose View In Website Mode The ACE train line (San Jose) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) San Jose: 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM (2) Stockton: 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest ACE train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next ACE train arriving. Direction: San Jose ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops San Jose Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Stockton Station 949 Channel St, Stockton Tuesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Lathrop/Manteca Station Wednesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Tracy Station Thursday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Friday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Vasco Road Station South Vasco Road, Livermore Saturday Not Operational Livermore Station Pleasanton Station 403 Old Bernal Av, Pleasanton ACE train Info Direction: San Jose Fremont Station Stops: 10 37275 Fremont Bl, Fremont Trip Duration: 132 min Line Summary: Stockton Station, Lathrop/Manteca Great America Station Station, Tracy Station, Vasco Road Station, West Tasman Drive, Santa Clara Livermore Station, Pleasanton Station, Fremont Station, Great America Station, Santa Clara Station, Santa Clara Station San Jose Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara San Jose Station Direction: Stockton ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops Stockton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM San Jose Station Tuesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Santa Clara Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara Wednesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Great America Station Thursday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM
    [Show full text]
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor
    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda I 680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan
    Alameda I-680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F 6-1-2020 6/24/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltrans Policy Development .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Senate Bill 1 and the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program ..................................................... 1 1.3 Document Structure............................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Stakeholders ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2: Corridor Goals, Objectives and Performance Metrics ................................................................ 3 Chapter 3: Corridor Overview ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Corridor Limits .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Route Significance ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Agenda Packet
    LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1362 Rutan Court, Suite 100 Livermore, CA 94551 PROJECTS and SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING / COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE MEMBERS DAVID HAUBERT – CHAIR JEAN JOSEY – VICE CHAIR KARLA BROWN BOB WOERNER Agenda Questions: Please call the Executive Director at (925) 455-7564 or send an email to [email protected] Documents received after publication of the Agenda and considered by the P&S Committee in its deliberation will be available for inspection only via electronic document transfer, due to the COVID-19 outbreak. See the COVID-19 provisions outlined below. Please call or email the Executive Director during normal business hours if you require access to any such documents. TELECONFERENCE MAY 24, 2021 – 4:00 PM CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) ADVISORY AND MEETING PROCEDURE On June 5, 2020 (updated June 18, 2020), the Health Officer of Alameda County issued an Order that will continue to be in effect until it is rescinded, superseded, or amended in writing by the Health Officer. The Order directed that all individuals living in the county to shelter at their place of residence except that they may leave to provide or receive certain essential services or engage in certain essential activities and work for essential businesses and governmental services. Under the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, this meeting may utilize teleconferencing. As a precaution to protect the health and safety of staff, officials, and the general public. Councilmembers will not be physically in attendance, but will be available via video conference. The administrative office of Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) is currently closed to the public and will remain closed for the duration of the Project & Services (P&S) Committee meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report
    Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report May 20, 2021 ES-1 Final Report Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report Prepared by Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) May 20, 2021 Executive Summary The 2018 California State Rail Plan envisions a network of high-speed, intercity corridor, and commuter trains integrated with local transit, providing nearly seamless connections for riders seeking to reach all parts of the state. In corridors where no trains operate, the Rail Plan calls for express buses using the existing highway systems to provide access to the state’s rail system. The Rail Plan identified the I-680 corridor between the Tri-Valley area (i.e. Dublin, Pleasanton, and Livermore) and Suisun City as one such corridor, where express buses could link a Tri-Valley Transit Hub with the Suisun-Fairfield Amtrak Station, a stop for the Capitol Corridor trains. This Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study is an effort to define what such express bus service would be: its route, stops, connections with corridor and commuter trains, as well as its likely ridership, revenue, and costs for implementation. The study investigates the BART Dublin/Pleasanton BART station as a candidate for the Tri-Valley Transit Hub, along with potential improvements that could make the facility easier, safer, and more comfortable for riders to use. The study also explores options to better connect northern San Joaquin County communities with the Tri-Valley Hub. The distance between the Suisun Amtrak Station and the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station is 53 miles, inclusive of a stop at the Martinez Amtrak Station.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.7.3 Project Environmental Impact Report
    Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction The Tri-Valley–San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority (Authority) is proposing the Valley Link Project, which is being evaluated on a project level in this Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR). This chapter provides a brief overview of the Proposed Project and alternatives; the Project goals and objectives; Project background and context; an overview of the environmental review process; and the scope, content, and organization of the Draft EIR. Figure 1-1. Valley Link Project Geographic Segments 1.2 Project Overview 1.2.1 Proposed Project The Proposed Project is a new 42-mile, 7-station passenger rail project that will connect the existing Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station in Alameda County to the approved Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) North Lathrop Station in San Joaquin County (Figure 1-1). Valley Link will use existing transportation corridors: the existing Interstate (I-) 580 corridor (11.7 miles) in the Tri-Valley; the Alameda County Transportation Corridor right-of-way (ROW) through the Altamont Pass (14.5 miles); and the existing Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Corridor (16.1 miles) in Northern San Joaquin County. The Proposed Project includes the following stations: ⚫ Dublin/Pleasanton (BART Intermodal) Valley Link Draft EIR 1-1 December 2020 ICF 00004.19 Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Introduction ⚫ Isabel (Livermore) ⚫ Greenville (Livermore) ⚫ Mountain House (San Joaquin County) ⚫ Downtown Tracy Station (Tracy) ⚫ River Islands Station (Lathrop) ⚫ North Lathrop Station (ACE Intermodal) The Proposed Project also includes the proposed Tracy Operation and Maintenance Facility (OMF), which would be located in the City of Tracy.
    [Show full text]
  • New BART Service to Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Stations
    New BART Service to Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Stations Comments and Feedback Please answer the questions below. Your answers will help us evaluate how well we’re reaching the communities we serve. BART values your input. Information will be treated confidentially. USAGE OF BART (Optional) Do you have any comments on any of the options listed in questions 7-8? 1. Which BART station do you usually enter when making a trip from __________________________________________________________ your home (i.e., your “home” station)? __________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 2. At which BART station do you usually exit the system (i.e., your __________________________________________________________ “destination” station)? ____________________________________________________ PROPOSED BART FARES FOR MILPITAS AND BERRYESSA/NORTH SAN 3. What time of day do you typically use BART? Select all that apply. JOSÉ STATIONS Morning Afternoon Evening Late night 9. BART plans to extend its distance-based fare structure for 4. Do you plan to use the Milpitas and/or Berryessa/North San José Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Stations. For example, in Station? Select all that apply. 2018, a one-way trip to Embarcadero Station from Warm Yes, Milpitas Station Springs/South Fremont Station will cost $6.75, while a trip to Yes, Berryessa/North San José Station Embarcadero Station from Milpitas Station is estimated to cost Neither, I plan to use: ___________________ $7.50 ($0.75 more), and from Berryessa/North San José Station, $7.75 ($1.00 more). Do you have any general comments about 5. How will you access the Milpitas and/or Berryessa/North San José BART’s proposed fares for Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Station? Select all that apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Dublin/ Pleasanton Station
    Transit For more detailed information about BART Information service, please see the BART schedule, MODESTO AREA EXPRESS BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. 4K DP Dublin/ San Francisco Bay Area Schedule Information e ective March 22, 2021 Amtrak Thruway bus service County Connection (CCCTA) Schedule Information e ective October 4, 2020 Modesto Area Express (MAX) San Joaquin RTD is the regional is a system of intercity coaches, provides xed-route bus and is the primary bus agency for transit provider for San Joaquin Rapid Transit (BART) rail Check before you go: up-to-date schedules are service connects the San locally-contracted transit buses, paratransit services throughout Modesto. The agency provides County and provides public Pleasanton available on www.bart.gov and the offi cial BART app. Route 35 Route 97X Route 335 Francisco Peninsula with through-ticketed local bus routes, Central Contra Costa County. For regular transit and dial-a-ride local transit services in the Stockton Overhead real-time displays can be found on station and taxi services that provides passengers more information call 925-676-7500 service in addition to commuter feeder Metropolitan Area, as well as intercity, Oakland, Berkeley, Berryessa, to to to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, platforms. A reference guide to transfer information of Amtrak’s rail service with connecting or visit www.countyconnection.com service to several regional rail systems: interregional, and rural transit services Station San Ramon TC/ San Ramon TC/ San Ramon TC/ BART, ACE, and Amtrak’s San Joaquin train. countywide. and other cities in the East Bay, as for trains without direct service is shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum 5.1 11
    Memorandum 5.1 11 DATE: September 4, 2020 TO: Planning, Policy and Legislation Committee FROM: Tess Lengyel, Executive Director Carolyn Clevenger, Deputy Executive Director of Planning and Policy SUBJECT: Approve Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Request for a 2014 Measure BB Transportation Expenditure Plan Amendment Recommendation It is recommended that the Commission approve the Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority (TVSJVRRA) request (Attachment A) for an amendment to the 2014 Measure BB Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) to: 1) acknowledge TVSJVRRA as a new agency in Alameda County that can be an eligible recipient of Measure BB funds; 2) remove the BART to Livermore project and associated $400 million Measure BB funding; 3) add Valley Link in Alameda County project with $400 million in Measure BB funding; and 4) make associated technical amendments. The Commission Plan Amendment Resolution recommended for approval is included as Attachment B and the proposed 2014 Measure BB Expenditure Plan redline markups and technical amendments are detailed in Attachment C. This is an action item and requires majority approval at the Planning, Policy and Legislation Committee (PPLC) and 2/3 of the Authorized vote for approval at the Commission meeting per the Implementing Guidelines of the 2014 TEP. Summary The 2014 Measure BB TEP included $400 million for BART to Livermore. Since that time, a significant number of developments have occurred on the project and in the project area, as detailed in the Project Background section of this memo. The TVSJVRRA was created by the State Legislature in 2017 by Assembly Bill 758 for the purposes of planning, developing and delivering cost-effective and responsive transit connectivity between BART and commuter rail service in the Tri-Valley and San Joaquin County that reflects regional consensus and meets the goals and objectives of the San Joaquin Valley and Tri- Valley communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Mineta Transportation Institute Publications 5-2019 Value Capture to Fund Public Transportation: The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA Shishir Mathur San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Shishir Mathur. "Value Capture to Fund Public Transportation: The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA" Mineta Transportation Institute Publications (2019). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mineta Transportation Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Project 1714 May 2019 Value Capture to Fund Public Transportation: The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA Shishir Mathur, Ph.D. MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE transweb.sjsu.edu MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF Hon. Norman Y. Mineta Mineta Consortium for Transportation Mobility MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES Founded in 1991, the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI), an organized research and training unit in partnership with the Founder, Honorable Norman Richard Anderson (Ex-Officio) Steve Heminger* (TE 2018) Dan Smith (TE 2020) Lucas College and Graduate School of Business at San José State University (SJSU), increases mobility for all by improving the safety, Mineta (Ex-Officio) President and CEO Executive Director President Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Metropolitan Transportation Capstone Financial Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Teleconference Special Board Meeting
    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Debby Moorhead, City of Manteca Commissioner, Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Commissioner, Doug Kuehne, City of Lodi Commissioner, John Marchand, City of Livermore Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE SPECIAL BOARD MEETING Call-In Information: 1 (408) 650-3123 Conference Access Code: 254-860-229 GoToMeeting Link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-july-special-board-meeting SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing 1 (408) 650-3123 with access code: 254-860-229 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-july-special-board-meeting. Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Emailed public comments should be limited to approximately 240 words as comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment.
    [Show full text]