DOCSLIB.ORG

PAM I Indices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PAM I Indices Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol. I INDEX: METHODS Index to PAM I Methods, by Chemicals Tested for Recovery 1,1'-(2,2-dichloroethylidene)= 2,3-dihydro-3,3-methyl-2-oxo- 2-methoxy-3,5,6- 3-hydroxymethyl-4,5-dimethyl bis(2-methoxybenzene) 5-benzofuranyl methyl trichloropyridine phenyl methylcarbamate Sec. 303 C1-C2 R sulfonate Sec. 302 C5 P Sec. 401 DL1 C 1,2,3,5-tetrachlorobenzene Sec. 302 C5 NR Sec. 302 no C C 3-ketocarbofuran Sec. 302 E2/E3+C1 V Sec. 402 E1 NR Sec. 303 C1 P( Sec. 302 no C S Sec. 303 C1 P Sec. 402 E2 NR Sec. 303 C2 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 303 C2 C 2,4,5-T Sec. 304 C1-C4 C Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 V Sec. 402 E1 P 3,4,5-trimethacarb Sec. 401 DL1 V 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene Sec. 402 E2 P Sec. 302 C3+DL1 C 3-methyl-4-nitrophenol Sec. 303 C1-C2 C 2,4,5-trichloro-alpha- Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 302 no C V Sec. 304 C1, C3 P methylbenzenemethanol Sec. 303 C2 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR 1,2,4,5-tetrachloro-3- Sec. 302 no C R Sec. 304 C2, C4 NR Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR (methylthio)benzene Sec. 303 C1-C2 R Sec. 401 DL1 C 3-tert-butyl-5-chloro-6- Sec. 302 no C R 2,4-D 3,4-dichloroaniline hydroxymethyluracil Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 402 E1 P Sec. 302 no C V Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 C Sec. 402 E2 P Sec. 303 C1-C2 S Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR 1,2,4-triazole 2,4-DB 3,4-dichlorophenylurea 4'-hydroxy bifenthrin Sec. 302 no C V Sec. 402 E1 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 402 E2 C Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR 4-(dichloroacetyl)-1-oxa-4- Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR 2,4-dichloro-6- 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol azapiro[4.5]decane 1-hydroxychlordene nitrobenzenamine Sec. 402 NR Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 303 C1-C2 R Sec. 303 C1-C2 R 3,5-dibromo-4- Sec. 303 C1-C2 P 10,10-dihydromirex 2,6-dichlorobenzamide hydroxybenzoic acid 4-chloro-6-methoxyindole Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 302 C5 NR Sec. 402 S Sec. 303 C1 R 10-monohydromirex Sec. 302 no C C 3,5-dichloroaniline 4-chlorobenzoic acid Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 302 no C S Sec. 402 E1 S 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroaniline Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 S Sec. 402 E2 S Sec. 303 C1-C2 R 2,8-dihydromirex Sec. 304 C1-C4 S 4-chlorobenzylmethyl sulfone 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroanisidine Sec. 303 C1-C2 C 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1- Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 C 2-chloroethyl caprate methoxyurea Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 V Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 302 no C R 4-chlorobenzylmethyl 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroanisole Sec. 304 C1-C4 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR sulfoxide Sec. 303 C1-C2 C 2-chloroethyl laurate Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 C 3-carboxy-5-ethoxy-1,2,4- Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR 2,3,5,6-tetrachloronitro= Sec. 304 C1-C4 C thiadiazole 4-chlorophenoxyaniline anisole 2-chloroethyl linoleate Sec. 302 no C NR Sec. 302 no C S Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 V Sec. 402 NR 4-CPA Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 V Sec. 304 C1-C4 P 3-chloro-5-methyl-4-nitro-1H- Sec. 402 E1 S 2,3,5,6-tetrachlorotere= Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 V pyrazole Sec. 402 E2 C phthalic acid 2-chloroethyl myristate Sec. 302 no C C 4-hydroxymethyl-3,5-dimethyl Sec. 402 E1 NR Sec. 302 no C C 3-chlorosulfonamide acid phenyl methylcarbamate Sec. 402 E2 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 V Sec. 402 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid Sec. 304 C1-C4 V 3-desmethyl sulfentrazone Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Sec. 402 E1 V 2-chloroethyl palmitate Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 401 DL1 C Sec. 402 E2 V Sec. 303 C1-C2 V Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR 6-chloro-2,3-dihydro-3,3,7- 2,3,5-trimethacarb Sec. 304 C1-C4 P 3-hydroxycarbofuran methyl-5H-oxazolo(3,2- Sec. 302 C3+DL1 C Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 V Sec. 302 C3+DL1 C a)pyrimidin-5-one Sec. 302 no C C 2-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3- Sec. 302 E1/E4+C4 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 303 C1 S methyl-5-benzofuranyl methyl Sec. 401 DL1 C Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Sec. 303 C2 NR sulfonate 3-hydroxymethyl-2,5-dimethyl 6-chloro-2,3-dihydro-7- Sec. 304 C2, C4 NR Sec. 302 C5 NR phenyl methylcarbamate hydroxymethyl-3,3-methyl- Sec. 401 DL1 C Sec. 402 E1 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR 5H-oxazolo(3,2-a)pyrimidin- 2,3,6-TBA Sec. 402 E2 NR Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR 5-one Sec. 402 E1 C Sec. 401 DL1 P Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 402 E2 C Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Codes: C: complete (recovery); P: partial; S: small; V: variable; R: recovered; NR: not recovered Transmittal No. 96-E1 (9/96) Form FDA 2905a (6/92) INDEX: METHODS–1 INDEX: METHODS Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol. I 6-chloronicotinic acid Sec. 304 C1, C3 C atrazine Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 304 C2, C4 P Sec. 302 C5 C Sec. 304 C1-C4 C Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR allidochlor Sec. 302 no C C bifenox 6-chloropicolinic acid Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 303 C1 S Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 402 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 303 C2 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 C 8-monohydromirex allophanate Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Sec. 304 C1-C4 P Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 404 C azinphos-ethyl Sec. 402 E1 C AC 263,222 ammonium salt alloxydim-sodium Sec. 302 C5 C Sec. 402 E2 C Sec. 402 NR Sec. 402 E1 NR Sec. 302 no C C bifenthrin acephate Sec. 402 E2 NR Sec. 303 C1 P Sec. 302 C5 C Sec. 302 E1/E4+C2 C alpha-cypermethrin Sec. 304 C1, C3 S Sec. 302 no C V Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 302 E2/E3+C1 C azinphos-methyl Sec. 303 C1-C2 C acetochlor Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 302 no C C binapacryl Sec. 302 C5 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 302 C5 C Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 C Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 303 C1 C ametryn azinphos-methyl oxygen Sec. 303 C1-C2 P Sec. 303 C2 P Sec. 302 no C C analog Sec. 304 C1-C4 P Sec. 304 C1-C4 P aminocarb Sec. 302 no C C bioresmethrin acifluorfen Sec. 302 C3+DL1 C benazolin Sec. 302 C5 NR Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 402 E1 NR biphenyl Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR amitraz Sec. 402 E2 NR Sec. 302 C5 C Sec. 402 E1 P Sec. 302 no C S bendiocarb Sec. 302 no C C acrinathrin anilazine Sec. 302 no C C bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Sec. 302 no C V( Sec. 302 no C V Sec. 401 DL1 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 303 C1 V( Sec. 303 C1-C2 S benfluralin Sec. 304 C1-C4 C Sec. 303 C2 V( Sec. 304 C1-C4 P Sec. 302 no C C bis(trichloromethyl)disulfide Sec. 304 C1, C3 NR Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 S Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 R Sec. 304 C2, C4 V( aramite Sec. 304 C1-C4 C bitertanol alachlor Sec. 302 no C C benodanil Sec. 302 E1/E4+C4 C Sec. 302 C5 P Sec. 303 C1-C2 P Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR benomyl bromacil Sec. 303 C1 C Aroclor 1016 Sec. 302 no C+DL5 C Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 304 C1, C3 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 404 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 NR Sec. 304 C2, C4 S Sec. 304 C1-C4 C benoxacor Sec. 304 C1-C4 NR Sec. 304 E1-E5+C6 S Aroclor 1221 Sec. 302 no C C Sec. 402 E2 NR aldicarb Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 P bromofenoxim Sec. 302 C3+DL1 C Sec. 304 C1-C4 C Sec. 304 C1-C4 C Sec. 402 E1 P Sec. 302 E1/E4+C4 C Aroclor 1242 bensulide Sec. 402 E2 C Sec. 401 DL1 C Sec. 303 C1-C2 C Sec. 302 no C C bromophos aldicarb sulfoxide Sec. 304 C1-C4 C Sec. 303 C1 P Sec. 302 C5 C Sec. 302 C3+DL1 C Aroclor 1248 Sec. 304 C1, C3 C Sec.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multi-Scale Impact of Chronic Exposure to Environmental Concentrations Of
    Multi-scale impact of chronic exposure to environmental concentrations of chlordecone in freshwater cnidarian, Hydra circumcincta Romain Colpaert, Pierre-Henri Villard, Laetitia de Jong, Marina Mambert, Karim Benbrahim, Joelle Abraldes, Claire Cerini, Valérie Pique, Maxime Robin, Xavier Moreau To cite this version: Romain Colpaert, Pierre-Henri Villard, Laetitia de Jong, Marina Mambert, Karim Benbrahim, et al.. Multi-scale impact of chronic exposure to environmental concentrations of chlordecone in freshwater cnidarian, Hydra circumcincta. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Springer Verlag, 2020, 27 (33), pp.41052-41062. 10.1007/s11356-019-06859-4. hal-02451113 HAL Id: hal-02451113 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02451113 Submitted on 23 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Multi-scale impact of chronic exposure to environmental concentrations of chlordecone in freshwater cnidarian, Hydra circumcincta. Romain COLPAERT1, Pierre-Henri VILLARD1, Laetitia DE JONG1, Marina MAMBERT1, Karim BENBRAHIM1, Joelle ABRALDES1, Claire CERINI2, Valérie PIQUE1, Maxime ROBIN1, Xavier MOREAU1 1 : Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France 2 : Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm U1263, C2VN, Marseille, France Corresponding author: email : [email protected] phone : +33-(0)4-91-83-56-38 Abstract Chlordecone (CLD) is an organochlorine pesticide widely used by the past to control pest insects in banana plantations in the French West Indies.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Identification of Alternatives to New Pops
    Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Guidance on identification of alternatives to new POPs Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention Concept of “Substitution” under the Stockholm Convention • The substitution is a strategy promoted by the Stockholm Convention to reach its objectives • Parties that are still producing or using the new POPs listed in Annex A, will need to search and identify alternatives to replace them • In the case of PFOS and for the exemptions for uses allowed by the Convention, these group of chemicals will be eventually prohibited and Parties are therefore encouraged to find alternatives to substitute them 2 Availability of alternatives • Currently, some countries have phased out the use of some of the new POPs, and there are feasible alternatives available to replace them Alternatives Chemical Name Use Ethoprop, oxamyl Pesticide to control banana root borer Cyfluthrin, Imidacloprid Pesticide to control tobacco wireworms Azadirachtin, bifenthrin, boric acid, carbaryl, Pesticide to control capsaicin, cypermethrin, cyfluthrin, ants and/or deltamethrin, diazinon, dichlorvos, cockroaches esfenvalerate, imidacloprid, lamda-cyhalothrin, Chlordecone malathion, permethrin, piperonyl butoxide, pyrethrins, pyriproxyfen, resmethrin, s- bioallerthrin, tetramethrin Bacillus thuringiensis, cultural practices such Pest management as crop rotation, intercropping, and trap cropping; barrier methods, such as screens, and bagging of fruit; use of traps such as pheromone and light traps to attract and kill insects. 3
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Tolerance of Peanuts to Alachlor and Metolachlor' Materials
    Relative Tolerance of Peanuts to Alachlor and Metolachlor' Glenn Wehtje*, John W. Wilcut, T. Vint Hicks2. and John McGuire3 ABSTRACT vealed that peas were most sensitive across all the sub- Field studies were conducted during 1984, 1985, and 1987 to evaluate weed control and the relative tolerance of peanuts stituted amide herbicides when the application was (Arachis hypogaea) to alachlor and metolachlor when applied at made 2 days after planting. This time of application cor- rates from 2.2 to 13.4 kg adha. Both single and split responded to shoot emergence, which is considered to preemergence, and postemergence applications were in- be the most sensitive portion of the seedling, through cluded. In 1984 and 1985, neither herbicide adversely affected the surface of the treated soil. Later applications re- yields compared to a hand-weeded control. In 1987, metolachlor at a rate of 9.0 kgha and alachlor at 13.4 k&a re- sulted in progressively less injury, indicating that the duced yields. Across all years, at least a two-fold safety factor foliar portion of the developing pea was relatively toler- existed between the maximum registered rate and the rate ant once emerged. Field studies indicated injury was necessary for peanut injury. Occurrence of injury appears to be markedly influenced by rainfall soon after planting. related to rainfall. Metolachlor was slightly more mobile than alachlor in soil chromatography trials, which may be a factor in Putnam and Rice (7) evaluated the factors associated its slightly greater propensity to be injurious under certain with alachlor injury on snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris conditions of extensive leaching and/or slow peanut L.).
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Residues in Food 2007 – Report, 2007 (E)
    FAO Pesticide residues PLANT PRODUCTION in food 2007 AND PROTECTION PAPER Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues 191 Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues Geneva, Switzerland, 18–27 September 2007 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2007 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. ISBN 978-92-5-105918-0 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Chief Electronic
    [Show full text]
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the WSSA
    Weed Science 2010 58:511–518 Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the Weed Science Society of America Below is the complete list of all common and chemical of herbicides as approved by the International Organization names of herbicides approved by the Weed Science Society of for Standardization (ISO). A sponsor may submit a proposal America (WSSA) and updated as of September 1, 2010. for a common name directly to the WSSA Terminology Beginning in 1996, it has been published yearly in the last Committee. issue of Weed Science with Directions for Contributors to A herbicide common name is not synonymous with Weed Science. This list is published in lieu of the selections a commercial formulation of the same herbicide, and in printed previously on the back cover of Weed Science. Only many instances, is not synonymous with the active ingredient common and chemical names included in this complete of a commercial formulation as identified on the product list should be used in WSSA publications. In the absence of label. If the herbicide is a salt or simple ester of a parent a WSSA-approved common name, the industry code number compound, the WSSA common name applies to the parent as compiled by the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) with compound only. CAS systematic chemical name or the systematic chemical The chemical name used in this list is that preferred by the name alone may be used. The current approved list is also Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) according to their system of available at our web site (www.wssa.net).
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Multiple Herbicide Resistant Strain of Diazotrophic Cyanobacterium, Anabaena Variabilis , Exposed to Atrazine and DCMU
    Indian Journal of Experimental Biology Vol. 49, April 2011, pp.298-303 Response of multiple herbicide resistant strain of diazotrophic cyanobacterium, Anabaena variabilis , exposed to atrazine and DCMU Surendra Singh, Pallavi Datta * & Archna Tirkey Algal Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, Rani Durgavati University, Jabalpur 482 001, India Received 1 June 2010; revised 24 January 2011 Effect of two photosynthetic inhibitor herbicides, atrazine (both purified and formulated) and [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)- 1,1-dimethyl urea] (DCMU), on the growth, macromolecular contents, heterocyst frequency, photosynthetic O 2 evolution and dark O 2 uptake of wild type and multiple herbicide resistant (MHR) strain of diazotrophic cyanobacterium A. variabilis was studied. Cyanobacterial strains showed gradual inhibition in growth with increasing dosage of herbicides. Both wild type and MHR strain tolerated < 6.0 mg L -1 of atrazine (purified), < 2.0 mg L -1 of atrazine (formulated) and < 0.4 mg L -1 of DCMU indicating similar level of herbicide tolerance. Atrazine (pure) (8.0 mg L -1) and 4.0 mg L -1 of atrazine (formulated) were growth inhibitory concentrations (lethal) for both wild type and MHR strain indicating formulated atrazine was more toxic than the purified form. Comparatively lower concentrations of DCMU were found to be lethal for wild type and MHR strain, respectively. Thus, between the two herbicides tested DCMU was more growth toxic than atrazine. At sublethal dosages of herbicides, photosynthetic O 2 evolution showed highest inhibition followed by chlorophyll a, phycobhiliproteins and heterocyst differentiation as compared to carotenoid, protein and respiratory O 2 uptake. Keyword s: Atrazine, Cyanobacteria, DCMU, Herbicides, Mutants, Photosynthesis In modern agriculture weed control by herbicides is a tolerate or resist toxic actions of various rice field common practice to increase in crop productivity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn and Soybean Mode of Action Herbicide Chart
    By Premix Corn and Soybean This chart lists premix herbicides alphabetically by their trade names so you can identify the premix’s component herbicides and their respective site of action groups. Refer Herbicide Chart to the Mode of Action chart for more information. Component Repeated use of herbicides with the same Site of Premix Trade Active Action site of action can result in the development of Trade Name ® Name ® Ingredient Group* herbicide-resistant weed populations. Authority First ............... Spartan sulfentrazone 14 FirstRate cloransulam 2 Axiom ........................... Define flufenacet 15 This publication was designed for commercial printing, color shifts may occur on other printers and on-screeen. Sencor metribuzin 5 Basis . ........................... Resolve rimsulfuron 2 Harmony GT thifensulfuron 2 By Mode of Action (effect on plant growth) Bicep II Magnum .......... Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 AAtrex atrazine 5 This chart groups herbicides by their modes of action to assist Bicep Lite II Magnum .... Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 AAtrex atrazine 5 you in selecting herbicides 1) to maintain greater diversity in Boundary ...................... Dual Magnum s-metolachlor 15 herbicide use and 2) to rotate among herbicides with different Sencor metribuzin 5 Breakfree ATZ ............... Breakfree acetochlor 15 sites of action to delay the development of herbicide resistance. atrazine atrazine 5 Breakfree ATZ Lite ........ Breakfree acetochlor 15 Number of atrazine atrazine 5 resistant weed Buctril + Atrazine ......... Buctril bromoxynil 6 atrazine atrazine 5 species in U.S. Bullet ............................ Micro-Tech alachlor 15 Site of Chemical Active atrazine atrazine 5 Action Product Examples Camix ........................... Callisto mesotrione 28 Group* Site of Action Family Ingredient (Trade Name ®) Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 Lipid Canopy DF ..................
    [Show full text]
  • 488 Subpart A—Organic Pesticide Chemicals Manufacturing
    § 455.11 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) chemical products and be considered a this subpart are applicable to dis- ‘‘stand-alone’’ PFPR facility. charges resulting from the manufac- ture of the following organic active in- [43 FR 17776, Apr. 25, 1978, as amended at 50 FR 40701, Oct. 4, 1985; 51 FR 44911, Dec. 15, gredients: Aldrin, BHC, Captan, 1986; 58 FR 50689, Sept. 28, 1993; 61 FR 57548, Chlordane, DDD, DDE, DDT, Dichloran, Nov. 6, 1996] Dieldrin, Endosulfan, Endrin, Hepta- chlor, Lindane, Methoxychlor, Mirex, Subpart A—Organic Pesticide PCNB, Toxaphene, Trifluralin, Chemicals Manufacturing Azinphos Methyl, Demeton-O, Demeton-S, Diazinon, Disulfoton, Mal- Subcategory athion, Parathion Methyl, Parathion Ethyl, Aminocarb, Carbaryl, SOURCE: 43 FR 44846, Sept. 29, 1978, unless Methiocarb, Mexacarbate, Propoxur, otherwise noted. Barban, Chlorpropham, Diuron, Fenuron, Fenuron-TCA, Linuron, § 455.11 Compliance date for pretreatment standards for existing Monuron, Monuron-TCA, Neubron, sources (PSES). Propham, Swep, 2,4-D, Dicamba, Silvex, 2,4,5-T, Siduron, Perthane, and All discharges subject to Dicofol. pretreatment standards for existing (c) The intermediates used to manu- sources (PSES) in subparts A and B of facture the active ingredients and ac- this part must comply with the stand- tive ingredients used solely in experi- ards no later than September 28, 1993. mental pesticides are excluded from [61 FR 57549, Nov. 6, 1996] coverage in this subpart. Insecticidal pathogenic organisms such as Bacillus § 455.20 Applicability; description of thuringiensis, insect growth hormones, the organic pesticide chemicals plant extracts such as pyrethrins; sex manufacturing subcategory. attractants and botanicals such as Ro- (a) For the purpose of calculating and tenone are also excluded from BPT applying effluent limitations for COD, coverage in this subpart.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries
    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of Teresa Homan with Attachments
    Teresa Homan Watertown, SD 57201 I am a landowner in Deuel County, South Dakota. Our land boarders the Deuel Harvest Wind Project in Deuel county, Docket # EL 18-053. There are 112 towers cited in the project, with 9 towers within a mile of our property. We have spent over three decades developing this property to enhance wildlife and for the enjoyment of our family. Can you imagine how we felt when we found we have a population of eastern bluebirds? We have yellow warblers, which by the way feed on the web worms that form in our trees. We have orioles, cedar waxwings, brown thrashers, rose breasted grosbeaks, gold finches, purple finches, robins, blue jays, nuthatches, eastern kingbirds, bitterns, dark eyed juncos, red winged blackbirds, morning doves, owls, cow birds, northern mocking birds, grey cat birds, wood thrushes, tufted titmouse, king fishers, indigo buntings, scarlet tanagers, bobolinks, meadowlarks, many woodpeckers, turkeys, turkey vultures, even humming birds and bald eagles. There are more, just to numerous to list. Many of these birds we have seen for the first time in our lives on this property in the past 1 O years. Not only are these birds beautiful and fun to watch, they have their purpose in the ecosystem. We also see northern long eared bats, that are on the endangered list in South Dakota. These birds are making a come back after the use of insecticides that nearly wiped out many. In the 1940's the insecticide DDT was introduced for public use, it is now banned from sale. In 1976 the herbicide Roundup was introduced to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse and Field Evaluation of Isoxaflutole for Weed Control In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Greenhouse and field evaluation of isoxaflutole for weed control in maize in China Received: 27 June 2017 Ning Zhao, Lan Zuo, Wei Li, Wenlei Guo, Weitang Liu & Jinxin Wang Accepted: 18 September 2017 Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to provide a reference for pre-emergence (PRE) Published: xx xx xxxx application of isoxaflutole on maize in China. In greenhouse study, the isoxaflutole PRE application at 30 g active ingredient (a.i.) ha−1 could effectively control large numbers of weeds, especially some large-seeded broadleaves, tested in this study. The tolerance results indicated 21 maize hybrids showed different responses to isoxaflutole under greenhouse conditions. In 2015 and 2016, field experiments were conducted to determine and compare the weed control efficacy and safety to Zhengdan 958 maize with 6 herbicide treatments. In both years, isoxaflutole PRE at 100 to 250 g a.i. ha−1 was sufficient to provide satisfactory full-season control of the dominant common broadleaf and grass weeds in the field. Temporary injury to maize was observed with isoxaflutole treatments of 125, 150, and 250 g a.i. ha−1 in both years, but plants recovered within 4 to 6 wk. To maximize maize yield and provide satisfactory weed control, a range of 100 to 150 g a.i. ha−1 of isoxaflutole is recommended, depending on the soil characteristics, weather, and weed species present at the experimental site. Based on the results, isoxaflutole PRE has good potential for weed control in maize in China. Maize was planted on more hectares than any other crops in China from 2010 to 2014, with an average of 35 million ha planted per year and yield averaging 5,779 kg per ha per year1.
    [Show full text]