Roman Frontier Studies 2009
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Romans and Batavians: Regional Developments at the Imperial Frontier
ROMANS AND BATAVIANS: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS AT THE IMPERIAL FRONTIER WillemJ.H. Willems The Batavians are certainly among the most well-known tribes in the Roman empire, both in antiquity and today. Their relation with the Romans has been the subject of much scholarly discussion in the past and the present, but most of this discussion was based primarily on literary data. With the exception of the work of Modderman (1949, 1951), however, no effort has been made to substanriate the archaeological data-base of the Batavian tribal area in the eastern part of the Dutch Rhine delta. Fortunately, in 1978 a detailed study of all archaeological evidence of the central part of this area could be starled. On the basis of the preliminary results of this project, it is now pos- sible to examine some of the archaeological correlates of the acculturation processes which operated here from the Late Iron Age to the Early Middle Ages (c. 250 B.C. - A.D. 750). But first it is necessary to examine some of the theoretical concepts invol- ved. Since the 1954 SSRC Seminar, acculturation is often defined as culture change that is initiated by the conjunction of two or more autonomous cultural systems. In our case it is evident that the differences between the cultural systems involved are very large in- deed (below p. 112 and Roymans this vol.). On the one hand is a system which may be described as a state, while on the other hand we are dealing with a society at a much lower level of social complexity. -
The Perils of Periodization: Roman Ceramics in Britain After 400 CE KEITH J
The Perils of Periodization: Roman Ceramics in Britain after 400 CE KEITH J. FITZPATRICK-MATTHEWS North Hertfordshire Museum [email protected] ROBIN FLEMING Boston College [email protected] Abstract: The post-Roman Britons of the fifth century are a good example of people invisible to archaeologists and historians, who have not recognized a distinctive material culture for them. We propose that this material does indeed exist, but has been wrongly characterized as ‘Late Roman’ or, worse, “Anglo-Saxon.” This pottery copied late-Roman forms, often poorly or in miniature, and these pots became increasingly odd over time; local production took over, often by poorly trained potters. Occasionally, potters made pots of “Anglo-Saxon” form using techniques inherited from Romano-British traditions. It is the effect of labeling the material “Anglo-Saxon” that has rendered it, its makers, and its users invisible. Key words: pottery, Romano-British, early medieval, fifth-century, sub-Roman Archaeologists rely on the well-dated, durable material culture of past populations to “see” them. When a society exists without such a mate- rial culture or when no artifacts are dateable to a period, its population effectively vanishes. This is what happens to the indigenous people of fifth-century, lowland Britain.1 Previously detectable through their build- ings, metalwork, coinage, and especially their ceramics, these people disappear from the archaeological record c. 400 CE. Historians, for their part, depend on texts to see people in the past. Unfortunately, the texts describing Britain in the fifth-century were largely written two, three, or even four hundred years after the fact. -
Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410
no nonsense Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410 – interpretation ltd interpretation Contract number 1446 May 2011 no nonsense–interpretation ltd 27 Lyth Hill Road Bayston Hill Shrewsbury SY3 0EW www.nononsense-interpretation.co.uk Cadw would like to thank Richard Brewer, Research Keeper of Roman Archaeology, Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, for his insight, help and support throughout the writing of this plan. Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47-410 Cadw 2011 no nonsense-interpretation ltd 2 Contents 1. Roman conquest, occupation and settlement of Wales AD 47410 .............................................. 5 1.1 Relationship to other plans under the HTP............................................................................. 5 1.2 Linking our Roman assets ....................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Sites not in Wales .................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Criteria for the selection of sites in this plan .......................................................................... 9 2. Why read this plan? ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Aim what we want to achieve ........................................................................................... 10 2.2 Objectives............................................................................................................................. -
RULES of PLAY COIN Series, Volume VIII by Marc Gouyon-Rety
The Fall of Roman Britain RULES OF PLAY COIN Series, Volume VIII by Marc Gouyon-Rety T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 1.0 Introduction ............................2 6.0 Epoch Rounds .........................18 2.0 Sequence of Play ........................6 7.0 Victory ...............................20 3.0 Commands .............................7 8.0 Non-Players ...........................21 4.0 Feats .................................14 Key Terms Index ...........................35 5.0 Events ................................17 Setup and Scenarios.. 37 © 2017 GMT Games LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232 • www.GMTGames.com 2 Pendragon ~ Rules of Play • 58 Stronghold “castles” (10 red [Forts], 15 light blue [Towns], 15 medium blue [Hillforts], 6 green [Scotti Settlements], 12 black [Saxon Settlements]) (1.4) • Eight Faction round cylinders (2 red, 2 blue, 2 green, 2 black; 1.8, 2.2) • 12 pawns (1 red, 1 blue, 6 white, 4 gray; 1.9, 3.1.1) 1.0 Introduction • A sheet of markers • Four Faction player aid foldouts (3.0. 4.0, 7.0) Pendragon is a board game about the fall of the Roman Diocese • Two Epoch and Battles sheets (2.0, 3.6, 6.0) of Britain, from the first large-scale raids of Irish, Pict, and Saxon raiders to the establishment of successor kingdoms, both • A Non-Player Guidelines Summary and Battle Tactics sheet Celtic and Germanic. It adapts GMT Games’ “COIN Series” (8.1-.4, 8.4.2) game system about asymmetrical conflicts to depict the political, • A Non-Player Event Instructions foldout (8.2.1) military, religious, and economic affairs of 5th Century Britain. -
From Barbarian Tribesmen to Proper Englishmen
CELEBRATING THE TENTH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE Issue 38 The 3rd century Roman ruins of Portchester Castle on the Southern coast of Spring 2008 England. Do these walls hold any significance to the Stidham* family? Inside President’s Message page 2 Society News & Notes page 3 Current Stidham* News page 3 Celebrating the 10th Anniversary Issue page 4 From Barbarian From Barbarian Tribesmen Tribesmen to Proper Englishmen Cover Story, page 6 to Proper Englishmen Did the Stidham* genetic line originate in the Balkans, then pass through In Future Issues: Stedham, England, before its arrival in 17th century Sweden? Upcoming stories you don’t want to miss. Recent advances in Y-DNA analysis make that proposition a reasonable page 12 probability, though not a certainty—yet. Story begins on page 6. President’s Message GREETINGS AGAIN FROM SAN DIEGO! Sorry for the delay in getting this issue finished and sent out to you. It took some time in pulling all the pieces together in order to bring you an issue worthy of my brief return as editor. As this issue marks the 10th anniversary of its launch, David Stidham sat Issue 38, Spring 2008 me at the editor’s desk once again to recall some of this publica- (Printed June 2008) tion’s highlights over this past decade, which begin on page 4. Now for some important business. I need to address plans for OFFICERS our Stidham* Family Reunion in Wilmington, Delaware. Due to Richard L. Steadham: President ongoing plans being made there this year regarding sites of his- Lora Scott: Treasurer torical interest to this family, the Board of Directors has voted to David R. -
0.00 Download Free
This is an Open Access publication. Visit our website for more OA publication, to read any of our books for free online, or to buy them in print or PDF. www.sidestone.com Check out some of our latest publications: ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA 45 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd I 16/07/15 13:00 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd II 16/07/15 13:00 ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA PUBLICATION OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHAEOLOGY LEIDEN UNIVERSITY EXCERPTA ARCHAEOLOGICA LEIDENSIA EDITED BY CORRIE BAKELS AND HANS KAMERMANS LEIDEN UNIVERSITY 2015 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd III 16/07/15 13:00 Series editors: Corrie Bakels / Hans Kamermans Editor of illustrations: Joanne Porck Copyright 2015 by the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden ISSN 0169-7447 ISBN 978-90-822251-2-9 Subscriptions to the series Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia can be ordered at: P.J.R. Modderman Stichting Faculty of Archaeology P.O. Box 9514 NL-2300 RA Leiden The Netherlands 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd IV 16/07/15 13:00 Contents The stable isotopes 13C and 15N in faunal bone of the Middle Pleistocene site Schöningen (Germany): statistical modeling 1 Juliette Funck Thijs van Kolfschoten Hans van der Plicht ‘Trapping the past’? Hunting for remote capture techniques and planned coastal exploitation during MIS 5 at Blombos Cave and Klasies River, South Africa 15 Gerrit L. Dusseldorp Geeske H.J. Langejans A Late Neolithic Single Grave Culture burial from Twello (central Netherlands): environmental setting, burial ritual and contextualisation 29 Lucas Meurkens Roy van Beek Marieke Doorenbosch Harry -
Map 10 Rhenus-Albis Compiled by J.H.F
Map 10 Rhenus-Albis Compiled by J.H.F. Bloemers, 1995 Introduction The map covers a large part of what Ptolemy (2.Prolog.; 2.11) called Germania Megale, that immense part of Germania outside the formal north-west limits of the Roman empire, bordered by the North Sea and Baltic Sea. During the Roman period the landscape was, as elsewhere, quite different from the present; in this region the coast, estuaries, rivers and moors deserve special attention. Long-known historical information has to be combined with knowledge acquired after World War II by intensive geological and palaeogeographical research in the Netherlands and northern Germany. Due to the rise in sea level and post-Roman shoreline changes, the coast along the southern North Sea has changed considerably since the Roman period, retreating landwards. In general, with the help of well-founded geological data, it can now be reconstructed in advance of the present-day shoreline (Kossack 1984, 51-82; van Es 1988, 88-94). Even so, it still seems prudent to render long stretches as approximate. In antiquity, principal rivers such as the Rhenus, Visurgis and Albis spread over wide flood-plains, but are now channeled between embankments. Large areas in the north of the modern Netherlands and Germany were covered by peat, and consequently almost inaccessible. Today, these are drained and cultivated, with the result that the ground level is now many feet lower than during Roman times. In addition, ancient Germania Megale was famous for its extensive, dense forests. All the Greek and Roman texts relating to the region are conveniently assembled by Byvanck (1931) and Goetz (1995). -
Roman Mortars Used in the Archaeological Sites In
UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE ARQUITECTURA ROMAN MORTARS USED IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN SPAIN AND TURKEY A COMPARATIVE STUDY AND THE DESIGN OF REPAIR MORTARS TESIS DOCTORAL DUYGU ERGENÇ Ingeniera Geológica y Máster en Restauración Junio 2017 CONSERVACIÓN Y RESTAURACIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO ARQUITECTÓNICO ESCUELA T ÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE ARQUITECTURA DE MADRID ROMAN MORTARS USED IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN SPAIN AND TURKEY A COMPARATIVE STUDY AND THE DESIGN OF REPAIR MORTARS Autor: DUYGU ERGENÇ Ingeniera Geológica y Máster en Restauración Directores: Dr. Fco. David Sanz Arauz Doctor en Arquitectura por ETSAM, UPM Dr. Rafael Fort González Doctor en Geología Económica por UCM, Senior científico en Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM) 2017 TRIBUNAL Tribunal nombrado por el Mgfco. Y Excmo. Sr. Rector de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, el día de de 2017 Presidente: Vocales: Secretario: Suplentes: Realizado el acto de lectura y defensa de la Tesis Doctoral el día de de 2017 en la Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid EL PRESIDENTE LOS VOCALES EL SECRETARIO I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. To my family Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the support and expertise of many people. First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisors, Dr. Fco. -
Plangebied Besjeslaan 3 Te Leiden
Plangebied Besjeslaan 3, Leiden Een archeologisch booronderzoek (verkennende fase) in de schaduw van het castellum Matilo G.H. de Boer Archol 489 Archol Plangebied Besjeslaan 3 te Leiden Een archeologisch booronderzoek (verkennende fase) in de schaduw van het castellum Matilo G.H. de Boer Colofon Archol Rapport 489 Plangebied Besjeslaan 3, Leiden Een archeologisch booronderzoek (verkennende fase) in de schaduw van het castellum Matilo Projectleiding: drs. A.J. Tol Auteur: ir. G.H. de Boer Tekstredactie drs. A.J. Tol Beeldmateriaal: ir. G.H de Boer Opmaak: A.J. Allen Druk: Haveka, Alblasserdam / Archol bv, Leiden Autorisatie: drs. A.J. Tol Handtekening ISSN 1569-2396 © Archol, Leiden 2019 Einsteinweg 2 2333 CC Leiden [email protected] Tel. 071 527 33 13 Inhoudsopgave Samenvatting 5 1 Inleiding 7 1.1 Aanleiding en doelstelling 7 1.2 Ligging plangebied en bouwplannen 8 1.3 Onderzoeksopzet en organisatie 10 2 Bekende gegevens 13 2.1 Landschappelijk kader 13 2.2 Archeologisch kader en verwachte bodemopbouw 14 2.3 Mogelijke verstoringen 16 3 Verkennend booronderzoek 17 3.1 Doel en vraagstellingen 17 3.2 Methodiek 17 3.3 Resultaten 19 3.3.1 Algemeen 19 3.3.2 Bodemopbouw 20 3.4 Interpretatie 25 4 Conclusie 27 4.1 Onderzoeksvragen 27 4.2 Advies 29 Literatuur 31 Figurenlijst 33 Tabellenlijst 33 Bijlage 1 Boorkolommen 35 BESJESLAAN 5 Samenvatting In opdracht van de familie Langezaal heeft Archol BV een inventariserend archeologisch veldonderzoek (verkennende fase door middel van boringen) uitgevoerd op het perceel Besjeslaan 3 te Leiden. Aanleiding voor het onderzoek is de voorgenomen sloop van de huidige woning en de bouw van een nieuwe woning op globaal dezelfde locatie. -
Roman Roads of Britain
Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath. -
7 the Roman Empire
Eli J. S. Weaverdyck 7 The Roman Empire I Introduction The Roman Empire was one of the largest and longest lasting of all the empires in the ancient world.1 At its height, it controlled the entire coast of the Mediterranean and vast continental hinterlands, including most of western Europe and Great Brit- ain, the Balkans, all of Asia Minor, the Near East as far as the Euphrates (and be- yond, briefly), and northern Africa as far south as the Sahara. The Mediterranean, known to the Romans as mare nostrum(‘our sea’), formed the core. The Mediterranean basin is characterized by extreme variability across both space and time. Geologically, the area is a large subduction zone between the African and European tectonic plates. This not only produces volcanic and seismic activity, it also means that the most commonly encountered bedrock is uplifted limestone, which is easily eroded by water. Much of the coastline is mountainous with deep river valleys. This rugged topography means that even broadly similar climatic conditions can pro- duce drastically dissimilar microclimates within very short distances. In addition, strong interannual variability in precipitation means that local food shortages were an endemic feature of Mediterranean agriculture. In combination, this temporal and spatial variability meant that risk-buffering mechanisms including diversification, storage, and distribution of goods played an important role in ancient Mediterranean survival strategies. Connectivity has always characterized the Mediterranean.2 While geography encouraged mobility, the empire accelerated that tendency, inducing the transfer of people, goods, and ideas on a scale never seen before.3 This mobility, combined with increased demand and the efforts of the imperial govern- ment to mobilize specific products, led to the rise of broad regional specializations, particularly in staple foods and precious metals.4 The results of this increased con- It has also been the subject of more scholarship than any other empire treated in this volume. -
The Masonry Bridges in Southern Italy: Vestige to Be Preserved
The masonry bridges in Southern Italy: vestige to be preserved M. Lippiello Second University of Naples, Department of Civil Engineering, Aversa,(CE),Italy L. Bove, L. Dodaro and M.R. Gargiulo University of Naples, Department of Constructions and Mathematical Methods in Architecture, Naples, Italy ABSTRACT: A previous work, “The Stone bridges in Southern Italy: from the Roman tradition to the Middle XIX century”, presented during the Arch Bridges IV, underlined the connection between bridge construction and street network. With the fall of the Roman Empire and the consequent breaking up of the territory into small free states, road construction was no longer a priority and many suburban bridges were abandoned as well. This survey focuses on the Sannio area. It will take into account the following: − ancient bridges still on use; − bridges of Samnite’ Age, adapted in the later centuries, nowadays in a marginal rule with respect to the roads net; − bridges cut off from the road system. The aim of this paper is to describe some of these structures and thereby propose a cataloguing methodology of structural, technologic and material aspects of masonry bridges. The planned methodology’s ultimate purpose is to preserve adequate evidence of this heritage and lay the foundations for its safeguarding in case, future sensibility towards these constructions will not depend exclusively on their utilization. 1 INTRODUCTION Located at about 80 Km N-NW from Naples, the Roccamonfina volcanic pile, extinct in pro- tohistoric era, divides the area in two ambits which differ not only from a geographic but also from a cultural point of view.