1 ROMANS CHANGED the MODERN WORLD How The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 ROMANS CHANGED the MODERN WORLD How The 1 ROMANS CHANGED THE MODERN WORLD How the Romans Changed the Modern World Nick Burnett, Carly Dobitz, Cecille Osborne, Nicole Stephenson Salt Lake Community College 2 Romans are famous for their advanced engineering accomplishments, although some of their own inventions were improvements on older ideas, concepts and inventions. Technology to bring running water into cities was developed in the east, but was transformed by the Romans into a technology inconceivable in Greece. Romans also made amazing engineering feats in other every day things such as roads and architecture. Their accomplishments surpassed most other civilizations of their time, and after their time, and many of their structures have withstood the test of time to inspire others. Their feats were described in some detail by authors such as Vitruvius, Frontinus and Pliny the Elder. Today our bridges look complex and so thin that one may think it cannot hold very much weight without breaking or falling apart, but they can. Even from the very beginning of building bridges, they have been made so many times that we can look at different ways to make the bridge less bulky and in the way, to one that is very sturdy and even looks like artwork. What allows an arch bridge to span greater distances than a beam bridge, or a suspension bridge to stretch over a distance seven times that of an arch bridge? The answer lies in how each bridge type deals with the important forces of compression and tension. Tension: What happens to a rope during a game of tug-of-war? It undergoes tension from the two opposing teams pulling on it. This force also acts on bridge structures, resulting in tensional stress. 3 Figure 1: Compression and Tension Compression: What happens when you push down on a spring and collapse it? You compress it, and by squishing it, you shorten its length. Compressional stress, therefore, is the opposite of tensional stress. Compression and tension are present in all bridges, and as illustrated in figure one, they are both capable of damaging part of the bridge as varying load weights and other forces act on the structure. It's the job of the bridge design to handle these forces (stress and strain) without buckling or snapping. Stress is a measure of how strong a material is. This is defined as “how much pressure the material can stand without undergoing some sort of physical change” (Google Dictionary). The yield stress is the level of stress at which a material will deform permanently (Google Dictionary). Stress causes strain. Putting pressure on an object causes it to stretch. Strain is a measure of how much an object is being stretched (Google Dictionary). Buckling occurs when compression overcomes an object's ability to endure that force. Snapping is what happens when tension surpasses an object's ability to handle the lengthening force. 4 The best way to deal with these powerful forces is to either dissipate them or transfer them. With dissipation, the design allows the force to be spread out evenly over a greater area, so that no one spot bears the concentrated brunt of it (How Bridges Work). We have four main types of bridges today: A Beam Bridge, Truss Bridge, the Arch Bridge, and a Suspension Bridge. The Beam Bridge (Figure 2): consists of horizontal beam supported at each end by piers. The weight of the beam pushes straight down on the piers. The farther apart its piers, the weaker the beam becomes. This is why beam bridges rarely span more than 250 feet. Beam bridges are often only used for really short distances because, unlike truss bridges, they have no built in supports. The only support for the bridge is provided by piers. Figure 2: The Beam Bridge The Truss Bridge (Figure 4): The Truss Bridge consists of an assembly of triangles. Truss bridges are commonly made from a series of straight, steel bars. The Firth and Forth Bridge in Scotland (Figure 3) in a cantilever bridge, a complex version of the truss bridge. 5 Figure 3: The Firth and Forth Bridge Rigid arms extend from both sides of two piers from both sides of two piers. Diagonal steel tubes, projecting from the top and bottom of each pier, hold the arms in place. The arms that project toward the middle are only supported on one side, like really strong diving boards. These “diving boards,” called cantilever arms, support a third, ventral span”. The bridge has triangle shapes in the frame, the triangles share the compression that an object exerts on the bridge so that one beam won’t support all the weight. Figure 4: The Truss Bridge The Arch Bridge: has great natural strength. Thousands of years ago, Romans built arches out of stone. Today, most arch bridges are made of steel or concrete, and they can span up to 800 feet. 6 Figure 5: The Arch Bridge The Suspension Bridge: can span 2000 to 7000 feet - way farther than any other type of bridge! Most suspensions bridges have a truss system beneath the roadway to resist bending and twisting (different types of Bridges). The suspension cables must be anchored at each end of the bridge, since any load applied to the bridge is transformed into a tension in these main cables. The main cables continue beyond the pillars to deck-level supports, and further continue to connections with anchors in the ground. Vertical suspender cables or rods, called hangers, support the roadway (Figure 6). In some circumstances the towers may sit on a bluff or canyon edge where the road may proceed directly to the main span, otherwise the bridge will usually have two smaller spans, running between either pair of pillars and the highway, which may be supported by suspender cables or may use a truss bridge to make this connection. In the latter case there will be very little arc in the outboard main cables” (Suspension Bridge, Wiki). 7 Figure 6: Suspension Bridge The Arch Bridge is also known as a Roman Bridge. Roman Bridges work the same way now as they did then, but with more modern technology. The Romans introduced stone arch technology over two thousand years ago. They applied to bridges they constructed across the known world and examples can still be seen today. The technology they used has stood the test of time and some Roman construction methods are still used today. The arch is a prime example of Roman technology that is still used world wide even though modern materials are now used. A wood frame was first constructed in the shape of an arch. The stonework was built up around the frame and finally a keystone was set in position. The wood frame could then be removed and the arch was left in position. Stone arch technology was used even on Roman monuments such as the Colosseum in Rome. Many of the monuments built with stone arch technology can still be seen today, such is the strength of the arch. 8 Figure 7: Arch Diagram Stone arches are not built entirely from stone. Stone is as expensive today as it was in Roman times. The Romans had a great understanding of material costs and consequently constructed stone bridges and viaducts from a combination of materials. The diagram above shows that accurately cut and shaped stone was used for the external walls. Gravel, sand and rough stone was used to fill all cavities. This filling was cheap to produce and use, compared to cut stone and it could be used by unskilled labor to fill the cavities of structures such as bridges and aqueducts (Typical Roman Stone Arch Construction). The arch is a curved beam that forms a half circular shape, which is made like this so it is prevented from straightening and spreading outward. The shape of the arch is formed from blocks or stones that have been carefully cut and put into place. Each one is wedge-shaped and once placed in its right position, the arch begins to take shape. 9 As the Keystone is pushed downwards by the load it carries, its wedge shape means that it pushes outward onto the sides, meaning that the forces are being spread sideways, rather than downwards. Therefore, the load on top that is crossing the bridge is partially transferred through the arch into the ground. Arch bridges have been in use for over 2000 years and are still in use. Over the years, engineers are finding ways to change the fashion of the bridge by changing the design or by using new materials that will make the bridge stronger and more efficient. As we have seen over the years, bridges have become more extraordinary, unique, and beautiful. 10 Roman dam building has received little attention from scholars compared to the attention given to other Roman engineering activities such as bridges and aqueducts; even though their expertise in dam building is as revolutionary as their water systems. The Romans built many dams for water collection, such as the Subiaco dams, two of which fed Anio Novus, the largest aqueduct supplying Rome. One of the Subiaco dams was reputedly the highest ever found or inferred. They built 72 dams in Spain, and many more are known across the empire. Roman masonry dams are very common in Britian, England, and North Africa. The Harbaqa Dam was a Roman gravity dam in the Syrian Desert between Damascus and Palmyra, dating to the 2nd century AD. It was built with a concrete core and ashlar. The reservoir served as a water source to nearby towns such as Palmyra.
Recommended publications
  • Roman Mortars Used in the Archaeological Sites In
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE ARQUITECTURA ROMAN MORTARS USED IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN SPAIN AND TURKEY A COMPARATIVE STUDY AND THE DESIGN OF REPAIR MORTARS TESIS DOCTORAL DUYGU ERGENÇ Ingeniera Geológica y Máster en Restauración Junio 2017 CONSERVACIÓN Y RESTAURACIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO ARQUITECTÓNICO ESCUELA T ÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE ARQUITECTURA DE MADRID ROMAN MORTARS USED IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN SPAIN AND TURKEY A COMPARATIVE STUDY AND THE DESIGN OF REPAIR MORTARS Autor: DUYGU ERGENÇ Ingeniera Geológica y Máster en Restauración Directores: Dr. Fco. David Sanz Arauz Doctor en Arquitectura por ETSAM, UPM Dr. Rafael Fort González Doctor en Geología Económica por UCM, Senior científico en Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM) 2017 TRIBUNAL Tribunal nombrado por el Mgfco. Y Excmo. Sr. Rector de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, el día de de 2017 Presidente: Vocales: Secretario: Suplentes: Realizado el acto de lectura y defensa de la Tesis Doctoral el día de de 2017 en la Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid EL PRESIDENTE LOS VOCALES EL SECRETARIO I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. To my family Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the support and expertise of many people. First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisors, Dr. Fco.
    [Show full text]
  • Holding Back Time: How Are Georgia's Historic Dams Unique Resources?
    HOLDING BACK TIME: HOW ARE GEORGIA'S HISTORIC DAMS UNIQUE RESOURCES? by MARK MOONEY (Under the Direction of Wayde Brown) ABSTRACT Much of what we recognize as modern, urban, industrialized Georgia can be credited to the availability and development of water power. Historic dams, originally through direct mechanical drives and later through electrical generation and transmission, provided significant impetus for the growth of the state. Additionally, the scale, scope, effort, and ingenuity involved in the construction of large dams makes them awe inspiring structures. Despite their contribution to our culture, and the complex context surrounding their construction, dams are often overlooked as historic resources. This thesis studies historic dams from around the country to establish a context for examining Georgia's own dams. How are they unique resources, deserving of a discrete set of tools for preservation? Four Georgia dams are evaluated and suggestions are made based on the conclusions found. INDEX WORDS: Dams, Historic Preservation, Industrial Archaeology, Hydropower, Hydroelectricity, Historic Survey, National Register, National Inventory, GNAHRGIS, Whitehall Dam, Eagle & Phenix Dam, Morgan Falls Dam, Tallulah Dam. HOLDING BACK TIME: HOW ARE GEORGIA'S HISTORIC DAMS UNIQUE RESOURCES? by MARK MOONEY B.S. University of Georgia, 2007 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ATHENS, GEORGIA 2012 © 2012 Mark Mooney All Rights Reserved HOLDING BACK TIME: HOW ARE GEORGIA'S HISTORIC DAMS UNIQUE RESOURCES? by MARK MOONEY Major Professor: Wayde Brown Committee: Mark Reinberger Mark Williams April Ingle Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS For bearing with me through five, six, seven, different topics, each of questionable quality and feasibility, I want to thank Wayde Brown.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewing Arch-Dams' Building Risk Reduction Through a Sustainability
    sustainability Review Reviewing Arch-Dams’ Building Risk Reduction Through a Sustainability–Safety Management Approach Enrico Zacchei 1,2 and José Luis Molina 3,* 1 Itecons—Institute for Research and Technological Development in Construction, Energy, Environment and Sustainability, Pedro Hispano Avenue, 3030-289 Coimbra, Portugal; [email protected] 2 School of Civil Engineering of Bauru, São Paulo State University (UNESP), 14-01 Eng. Luís Edmundo Carrijo Coube Avenue, Bauru 17033-360, Brazil 3 IGA Research Group, Higher Polytechnic School of Ávila, University of Salamanca (USAL), 50 Avenue Hornos Caleros, 05003 Ávila, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 November 2019; Accepted: 31 December 2019; Published: 3 January 2020 Abstract: The importance of dams is rapidly increasing due to the impact of climate change on increasing hydrological process variability and on water planning and management need. This study tackles a review for the concrete arch-dams’ design process, from a dual sustainability/safety management approach. Sustainability is evaluated through a design optimization for dams´ stability and deformation analysis; safety is directly related to the reduction and consequences of failure risk. For that, several scenarios about stability and deformation, identifying desirable and undesirable actions, were estimated. More than 100 specific parameters regarding dam-reservoir-foundation-sediments system and their interactions have been collected. Also, a summary of mathematical modelling was made, and more than 100 references were summarized. The following consecutive steps, required to design engineering (why act?), maintenance (when to act) and operations activities (how to act), were evaluated: individuation of hazards, definition of failure potential and estimation of consequences (harm to people, assets and environment).
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Roads of Britain
    Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath.
    [Show full text]
  • The Masonry Bridges in Southern Italy: Vestige to Be Preserved
    The masonry bridges in Southern Italy: vestige to be preserved M. Lippiello Second University of Naples, Department of Civil Engineering, Aversa,(CE),Italy L. Bove, L. Dodaro and M.R. Gargiulo University of Naples, Department of Constructions and Mathematical Methods in Architecture, Naples, Italy ABSTRACT: A previous work, “The Stone bridges in Southern Italy: from the Roman tradition to the Middle XIX century”, presented during the Arch Bridges IV, underlined the connection between bridge construction and street network. With the fall of the Roman Empire and the consequent breaking up of the territory into small free states, road construction was no longer a priority and many suburban bridges were abandoned as well. This survey focuses on the Sannio area. It will take into account the following: − ancient bridges still on use; − bridges of Samnite’ Age, adapted in the later centuries, nowadays in a marginal rule with respect to the roads net; − bridges cut off from the road system. The aim of this paper is to describe some of these structures and thereby propose a cataloguing methodology of structural, technologic and material aspects of masonry bridges. The planned methodology’s ultimate purpose is to preserve adequate evidence of this heritage and lay the foundations for its safeguarding in case, future sensibility towards these constructions will not depend exclusively on their utilization. 1 INTRODUCTION Located at about 80 Km N-NW from Naples, the Roccamonfina volcanic pile, extinct in pro- tohistoric era, divides the area in two ambits which differ not only from a geographic but also from a cultural point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • The 5 Biggest Dams in India
    The 5 Biggest Dams in India After independence we have made lots of progress in Dam and water reservoirs, Now India is one of the world’s most prolific dam-builders. Around 4300 large dams already constructed and many more in the pipeline, Almost half of which are more than twenty years old. These dams are major attraction of tourists from all over India. Some facts about the Indian dams are: . Tehri Dam is the eighth highest dam in the world. The Idukki dam is the first Indian arch dam in Periyar River Kerala and the largest arch dam in Asia. The Grand Anicut, Kallanai, located on Holy Cavery River in Tamil Nadu, is the oldest dam in the world. Indira Sagar Dam is the Largest Reservoir in India. These dams with the channel provides an ideal environment for wildlife. Tehri Dam -Uttaranchal Tehri Dam located on the Bhagirathi River, Uttaranchal Now become Uttarakhand. Tehri Dam is the highest dam in India,With a height of 261 meters and the eighth tallest dam in the world. The high rock and earth-fill embankment dam first phase was completed in 2006 and other two phases are under construction. The Dam water reservoir use for irrigation, municipal water supply and the generation of 1,000 MW of hydroelectricity. Height: 260 meters . Length: 575 meters . Type: Earth and rock-fill . Reservoir Capacity: 2,100,000 acre·ft . River: Bhagirathi River . Location: Uttarakhand . Installed capacity: 1,000 MW Bhakra Nangal Dam -Himachal Pradesh Bhakra Nangal Dam is a gravity dam across the Sutlej river Himachal Pradesh.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Study of Arch Dams Behaviour
    1 First National Dam Safety Conference CWC, TNWRD and IITM A Brief Study of Arch Dams Behaviour Dr. B. R. K. Pillai Zika Smiljkovic Dr. A. K. Dhawan Project Director, DRIP Dam Design Engineer Dam Instrumentation Specialist, Central Water Commission, New EGIS Eau EGIS India Delhi Montpellier, France Email: dir‐drip‐[email protected] 2 Causes for Potential Unusual (Irrecoverable) Behavior of Arch Dams 3 Alkali Silica Slow Reaction (ASSR) Flow chart of stages of alkali silica formation: Mechanism:Alkali solution in cement paste pores attacks reactive minerals of concrete aggregate producing thus alkali silica gel which in presence of water swells. The gel usually builds up within the aggregate fragments which then swells causing expansion of concrete and cracking of surrounding cement paste. Affects initially the aggregate. 4 ASSR Displays • Long lasting irreversible chemical process causing: irreversible upstream deflection of dams crest, upheaval of dam crest and mostly continuous cracking of upper galleries. • Expansive reaction from a few to approx. 30 years. Initiation, development and, slow down phase following exhaustion of alkalis. • Impairing the concrete strength and integrity, and state of equilibrium of a dam. 5 • Cases reported: Chambon dam, upheaval of 3.6mm/yr; Arch dams in Alpine region, U/S drift up to 1mm/yr. • Cracking of inspection galleries reported: Pian Telesio Dam(Italy), Portodemouros dam (Spain). • Karun Dam, Iran, 205m height and 14 yr old, exposed to ASSR. • ASSR limited with service compressive field > 6MPa, as reported. Tensile stresses are less constrainable to ASSR development. • Upstream drift mechanism: lower RWL with higher concrete temperature →upstream deflection of upper arches → tensile stress on U/S dam face → pronounced U/S dam face swelling→ irreversible upstream dri.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th ROMAN BRIDGES on the LOWER PART of the DANUBE
    th 7 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Contemporary achievements in civil engineering 23-24. April 2019. Subotica, SERBIA ROMAN BRIDGES ON THE LOWER PART OF THE DANUBE Isabella Floroni Andreia-Iulia Juravle UDK: 904:624.21"652" DOI: 10.14415/konferencijaGFS2019.015 Summary: The purpose of the paper is to present the Roman bridges built across the Romanian natural border, the Danube, during the Roman Empire expansion. Some of these are less known than the famous Traian’s bridge in Drobeta Turnu Severin. The construction of bridges on the lower part of the Danube showed the importance of conquering and administrating the ancient province of Dacia. The remaining evidences prove the technical solutions used by the Roman architects at a time when public works had developed. Keywords: Danube bridges, pontoon bridge, Bridge of Constantine the Great, Columna Traiana 1. INTRODUCTION The Danube1 was once a long-standing frontier of the Roman Empire, and today flows through 10 countries, more than any other river in the world. Originating in Germany, the Danube flows southeast for 2,850 km, passing through or bordering Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova and Ukraine before draining into the Black Sea. Romania has the longest access to the river, around 1075 km, of which 225 km on Romanian territory exclusively. | CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (2019) | 189 7. МЕЂУНАРОДНА КОНФЕРЕНЦИЈА Савремена достигнућа у грађевинарству 23-24. април 2019. Суботица, СРБИЈА Fig. 1 Map of the main course of the Danube During the Roman Empire many wooden or masonry bridges were built, some of which lasted longer, other designed for ephemeral military expeditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defensive System of the Late Roman Limes Between Germania Secunda and Britannia
    Corso di Laurea magistrale in Scienze dell’Antichità: Letterature, Storia e Archeologia Tesi di Laurea The defensive system of the late Roman limes between Germania Secunda and Britannia Relatore Dr. Daniela Cottica Laureanda Sofia Turk Matricola 825383 Anno Accademico 2011 / 2012 Table of content 1. Preface ................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction to the late Roman army ...................................................... 10 2.1. The Army of the 3 rd century and the Diocletianic reform ................ 11 2.2. The army after Constantine the Great ..................................................17 2.3. Transformations in late Roman fortification measures .....................22 3. The Lower Rhine frontier and northern Gaul .......................................31 3.1. General overview........................................................................................ 31 3.2 Fortified urban centres or military road posts?....................................39 3.3 Fortifications from Postumus to the end of the century.....................41 3.4 Defensive measures taken by Constantine and his sons .....................48 3.5. Reconstruction of the frontier in the second half of the 4 th century57 4. The coastal defences in south-eastern Britannia .................................63 4.1 Introduction..................................................................................................63 4.2. New fortifications under the Gallic
    [Show full text]
  • Manual Stone Arch Bridges
    Kasese District Local Government Stone arch bridges A strong & cost effective technology for rural roads A practical manual for Local Governments Foreword This manual was developed based on the experience of the Belgian Technical Cooperation (BTC) supported Kasese District Poverty Reduction Programme (KDPRP) in Western Uganda, during the period 2009- 2013. The programme piloted stone arch culverts and bridges in rural areas, where low Table of contents labour costs and high cost of industrial building materials favour this technology. The 1. Chapter 1: Introduction to stone arch bridges .............................. 2 construction of stone arch bridges in Uganda, 1.1 Background and justification. ...................................................... 2 Tanzania & Rwanda has demonstrated its 1.2 The stone arch bridge technology ............................................... 3 overall feasibility in East Africa. 1.3 Advantages & limitations. ........................................................... 5 1.4 Stone arch bridges: implications of labour-based technology. ... 7 How to use this manual 2. Chapter Two: Design of stone arch bridges ................................... 8 The purpose of this manual is to provide 2.1 Quick scan – site assessment ...................................................... 8 supervisors of stone arch bridge works with 2.2 Planning and stakeholders involved. ........................................... 9 an easy step by step guide. The stepwise 2.3 Design .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Roads in Britain
    ROMAN ROADS IN BRITAIN c < t < r c ROMAN ROADS IN BRITAIN BY THE LATE THOMAS CODRINGTON M, INST.C. E., F. G S. fFITH LARGE CHART OF THE ROMAN ROADS AND SMALL MAPS IN THE TEXT REPRINT OF THIRD EDITION LONDON SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1919 . • r r 11 'X/^i-r * ' Ci First Edition^ 1903 Second Edition, Revised, 1905 Tliird Edition, Revised, 1918 (.Reprint), 19 „ ,, 19 PREFACE The following attempt to describe the Roman roads of Britain originated in observations made in all parts of the country as opportunities presented themselves to me from time to time. On turning to other sources of information, the curious fact appeared that for a century past the litera- ture of the subject has been widely influenced by the spurious Itinerary attributed to Richard of Cirencester. Though that was long ago shown to be a forgery, statements derived from it, and suppositions founded upon them, are continually repeated, casting suspicion sometimes unde- served on accounts which prove to be otherwise accurate. A wide publicity, and some semblance of authority, have been given to imaginary roads and stations by the new Ordnance maps. Those who early in the last century, under the influence of the new Itinerary, traced the Roman roads, unfortunately left but scanty accounts of the remains which came under their notice, many of which have since been destroyed or covered up in the making of modern roads; and with the evidence now available few Roman roads can be traced continuously. The gaps can often be filled with reasonable certainty, but more often the precise course is doubtful, and the entire course of some roads connecting known stations of the Itinerary of Antonine can only be guessed at.
    [Show full text]
  • Were Used by the Romans and in What Contexts Frisii and Frisiavones Used Their Own Ethnic Names
    FRISII AND FRISIAVONES M.C. GALESTIN University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, Groningen, the Netherlands ABSTRACT: A study was made of the literary and epigraphical evidence referring to Frisii or Frisiavones, with the aim of assessing their relations with the Romans. The similarity of their names makes it difficult to distinguish between the two tribes. It emerges that the Frisii and Frisiavones probably were not related and lived in different territories. Both groups had contacts with the Romans, who made their names part of recorded history. Both Frisii and Frisiavones served in the Roman army and received Roman citizenship afterwards. The Frisiavones made their appearance around the middle of the first century and towards the end of the first century they formed an ethnic unit which served in Britain during the 2nd and 3rd centuries. Frisii were active in the Roman army from their first encounter in 12 BC, but their name did not become linked to an ethnic unit until the 3rd century, when several Frisian units were deployed in forts along Hadrian’s Wall. The Frisiavones had become incorporated into the Roman Empire, while the Frisii remained outside. The Frisii adopted some Roman habits but largely retained their own cultural identity. Members of both groups were present in Rome, as equites singulares, where their ethnic names are found combined with Roman names in their epitaphs. Their relations with the Roman Empire also provided new identities for Frisii and Frisiavones. KEYWORDS: Frisii, Frisiavones, Roman army, Roman Empire, ethnic identity. 1. InTRODUCTION were used by the Romans and in what contexts Frisii and Frisiavones used their own ethnic names.
    [Show full text]