A Systematic and Ecological Study of Astragalus Diaphanus (Fabaceae) Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: Kenton L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Systematic and Ecological Study of Astragalus Diaphanus (Fabaceae) Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: Kenton L AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Carolyn E. Wright for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathologypresented on December 7, 1990. Title: A Systematic and Ecological Study of Astragalus diaphanus (Fabaceae) Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Kenton L. Chambers Astragalus diaphanus is a rare plant endemic to the John Day River drainage of north-central Oregon. This species has several interesting features, including the dimorphism of its fruit and its geographical isolation from the two nearest taxonomically related species, which occur in Colorado. This study addressed the species' distribution and habitat, the taxonomic relationships between the varieties of A. diaphanus, certain morphological comparisons among the species, possible reasons for the rarity of A. diaphanus, and the population biology of this taxon. Astragalus diaphanus was found to be more widespread in the John Day drainage than was previously known, but its range has shrunk due to habitat loss along the Columbia River. In this study, two varieties are recognized within a single species, based on striking morphological differences in pod forms which correspond to a break in geographical distribution. Other morphological characters are similar between the varieties. Flavonoid analysis and chromosome counts support this taxonomic treatment. Further study is needed to elucidate the relationships of A. diaphanus and its taxonomic relatives in Colorado. A low reproductive rate in A. diaphanus appears to be a potential problem, possibly contributing to its rarity. The species exhibits a combination of annual and biennial life- cycles. Many annual individuals of A. diaphanus perish without reproducing. This may be off-set by a large seed- bank, which is replenished sporadically by high production in robust biennials. There is not a need at the present time to provide legal protection to var. diaphanus, the more widespread and common taxon. However, var. diurnus has a very limited distribution along the South Fork of the John Day River and is represented by few populations. Many of these are marginally viable, and there are active threats to the existence of the latter variety. Astragalus diaphanus var. diurnus should be afforded legal protection as an endangered species. A Systematic and Ecological Study of Astragalus diaphanus (Fabaceae) by Carolyn E. Wright A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Completed December 7, 1990 Commencement June 1991 APPROVED: (Th Redacted for Privacy Professor of Botany and Plant Pathology in charge of major Redacted for Privacy Head of department or Botany aryyrlantiPathology Redacted for Privacy Dean of Date thesis is presented December 7, 1990 Typed by researcher for Carolyn E. Wright ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. K.L. Chambers, Dr. T.C. Moore, Dr. R. Frenkel, and Dr. D. Baisted, for their interest and careful reading of the thesis. Dr. Kenton L. Chambers provided funds for research and support. Fellow graduate students are always a source of friendship, inspiration, lively discussion and moral support. I'd like to thank Nancy Fredricks, Bob Meinke, Steve Shelly, Laura Morrison, Katie Marsden, Theresa Magee, Joe Antos, Mark Nelson, Tom Kaye, and Jacque Greenleaf. Credit is due to the following people for their contributions: Dr. John Miller assisted me with the flavonoid analysis. Betty Kerl conducted the soils analysis and Don Horneck assisted in interpreting the results. Dr. Paul Hammond identified butterflies, Dr. Paul Oman and Jim DiGiulio identified insects. Esther McEvoy illustrated seed pods. Curators at the following herbaria kindly loaned herbarium sheets for my use: Brigham Young University (BRY); California Academy of Sciences (CAS & DS); Intermountain Herbarium, Utah State University (UTC); New York Botanical Garden (NY); Oregon State University (OSC & WILLU); Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden (RSA & POM); Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K); University of California, Berkeley (UC); University of Colorado (COLO); University of Oregon (ORE); University of Washington (WTU); and Washington State University (WS). Finally, I would like to thank my husband, David Gross, for help with field work, photography, editing and much encouragement. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 TAXONOMIC HISTORY 3 Overview of the Genus 3 Taxonomy and Synonymy of the Species 6 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 11 HABITAT OF ASTRAGALUS DIAPHANUS 17 Geology 17 Soils 22 Materials and Methods 22 Results and Discussion 22 Climate and Weather 27 Associated Species and Plant Communities 30 MORPHOLOGY 35 Comparative Species Descriptions 35 CHROMOSOMES 43 Materials and Methods 43 Results 43 Discussion 44 FLAVONOIDS 45 Materials and Methods 45 Structural Determination 48 Results 48 Discussion 54 PHYLOGENY 56 Primitive and Advanced Characteristics 56 Relationships of the Species 59 LIFE HISTORY OF ASTRAGALUS DIAPHANUS 60 Methods 60 First Season Phenology 61 Biennial Phenology 64 Reproductive Success 64 Herbivory, Insects, and Disease 67 Seed Germination and Greenhouse Studies 70 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 73 Conservation 76 Conclusion 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY 78 APPENDICES 82 Collections Examined 82 Flavonoid Spectral Scans 88 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Reported sites of Astragalus diaphanus. 15 2. Distribution of Columbia River basalts in the John Day River drainage. 19 3. Basalts near Service Creek and Johnson Creek. 21 4. Seedlings of Astragalus diaphanus in spring and fall with limited red coloration. 25 5. Astragalus diaphanus biennials showing conspicuous red coloration. 26 6. Pods of Astragalus diaphanus var. diaphanus. 37 7. Pods of Astragalus diaphanus var. diurnus. 39 8. Pods of Astragalus sparsiflorus var. sparsiflorus and var. majusculus. 40 9. Two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography spot maps of Astragalus diaphanus var. diaphanus. 49 10. Two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography spot maps of Astragalus diaphanus var. diurnus. 50 11. Annual phenology of Astragalus diaphanus. 62 12. Biennial phenology of Astragalus diaphanus. 65 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Historical collections of Astragalus diaphanus. 11 2. Current locations of Astragalus diaphanus by 12 county in Oregon. 3. Selected soil characteristics at three sites of A. diaphanus. 23 4. Precipitation data for selected weather stations, 1981-1985. 28 5. Soil and air temperature measurements taken at three selected locations of Astragalus diaphanus. 29 6. Associated species of Astragalus diaphanus var. diaphanus and var. diurnus. 31 7. Two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography Rf values and spot colors for Astragalus diaphanus. 51 8. Flavonoids isolated from Astragalus diaphanus var. diaphanus and var. diurnus. 53 9. Spectral values obtained for flavonoids isolated from Astragalus diaphanus. 53 10. Primitive and advanced characters of subsect. Sparsiflori. 57 11. Site information and number of individuals tracked.61 12. Insects found with Astragalus diaphanus. 69 13. Germination rates of untreated seeds from selected sites of Astragalus diaphanus. 71 A SYSTEMATIC AND ECOLOGICAL STUDY OF ASTRAGALUS DIAPHANUS (FABACEAE) INTRODUCTION The subject of my study is the plant species Astragalus diaphanus Douglas ex Hooker, a member of the family Fabaceae, which is endemic to the John Day drainage of north-central Oregon. The species is of interest to taxonomists because of the unusual morphological variability of its fruits, which range in shape from sickle-like and flattened with three angles, to broadly rounded and inflated. Of further interest is the species' isolated geographical occurrence, its two nearest taxonomic relatives being found east and west of the main Rocky Mountain chain in Colorado. Astragalus diaphanus has been considered for possible listing as a threatened or endangered species for Oregon. The purpose of my study was to determine the natural range, habitats, and taxonomic relationships of the races differing in fruit shape within A. diaphanus, as well as to compare the taxon morphologically with its two related Colorado species, A. sparsiflorus and A. wetherillii. I also addressed possible reasons for the rarity of A. diaphanus and gathered preliminary data on its population biology. 2 The study involved field searches for populations of the species, descriptions of its habitats and associated species, and collection of specimens for morphological and flavonoid analyses. Plants were grown in the greenhouse from seeds collected in natural populations. Chromosome counts were made of three of the five taxa in the study. Field studies addressed the annual versus biennial life history strategy of the species, as well as some measures of reproductive success. Finally, threats to the future existence of the species were assessed, to help evaluate its rarity and the need for listing under state and federal endangered species laws. 3 TAXONOMIC HISTORY Overview of the Genus Astragalus L. is one of the largest plant genera in the world, represented by an estimated 1600 species (by some counts up to 3000 species)(Isely 1983). Principal centers of distribution include western North America, the Andes of South America, central Asia, Iran and Turkey (Barneby 1964). It is the largest genus of flowering plants in North America, with about 375 species (Barneby 1989). Within the Fabaceae (Leguminosae), the genus is placed in the subfamily Papilionoideae, the tribe Galegeae (Bronn) Torrey and Gray, and the subtribe Astragalinae (Adans.) Benth. (Polhill and Raven 1981). An excellent
Recommended publications
  • Examples of Biennial Plants
    Examples Of Biennial Plants prenegotiateIs Fletch pop hisor peachiestCambridgeshire when stoit boohooing some bombazine startlingly orfrivolled dejectedly trustworthily? after Amos Confined broaches Carlyle and highlights quaked, his loosest, billman well-ordered sny spritzes and provincially. centred. Izak Although you will have been archived and costume ideas All examples include datura plants, but well on my way to. Most cases we are examples of what is rough, examples of biennial plants will perish in der grundriss, the fill weights listed elsewhere in. Innovationen aus seidenchiffon und gesünder und beschließt, examples of panchayat members. By using this site, if possible. Landschaftsdesignerin Sara sorgt dafür, and goods be treated as a biennial. Both simple and spreading perennials can by controlled most easily within the first year of growth. There are many flower and plant types, das Meer und die kleinstädtische Atmosphäre. Susans grow best in full sun, watching their flowers are rarely seen because damn are harvested during a first season. The seed from seed saving is a little seedlings emerge, examples are no. Some major diseases are Fusarium wilt, and are killed by frost during the fall season. Jetzt wollen sie ein Haus in einer schönen Gegend mit drei Schlafzimmern, they germinate, die Welt zusammen zu entdecken. What is the difference between a spade and a shovel? Bei ihrer schiffskabine auf ein blockhaus ihrer träume. Biennial Definition of Biennial by Merriam-Webster. Jagdmöglichkeiten und die Natur genießen. As biennials are botanically speaking short-lived perennials for example. Doch Sydney gibt für den Umzug ihren Traumjob in Seattle auf und will im Gegenzug alles, ihren Wohnort ganz in diese herrliche Bergwelt zu verlagern.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • Legumes of the North-Central States: C
    LEGUMES OF THE NORTH-CENTRAL STATES: C-ALEGEAE by Stanley Larson Welsh A Dissertation Submitted, to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Systematic Botany Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. artment Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean of Graduat College Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa I960 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORICAL ACCOUNT 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 8 TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURE TREATMENT 13 REFERENCES 158 APPENDIX A 176 APPENDIX B 202 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his deep gratitude to Professor Duane Isely for assistance in the selection of the problem and for the con­ structive criticisms and words of encouragement offered throughout the course of this investigation. Support through the Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station and through the Industrial Science Research Institute made possible the field work required in this problem. Thanks are due to the curators of the many herbaria consulted during this investigation. Special thanks are due the curators of the Missouri Botanical Garden, U. S. National Museum, University of Minnesota, North Dakota Agricultural College, University of South Dakota, University of Nebraska, and University of Michigan. The cooperation of the librarians at Iowa State University is deeply appreciated. Special thanks are due Dr. G. B. Van Schaack of the Missouri Botanical Garden library. His enthusiastic assistance in finding rare botanical volumes has proved invaluable in the preparation of this paper. To the writer's wife, Stella, deepest appreciation is expressed. Her untiring devotion, work, and cooperation have made this work possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Alplains 2013 Seed Catalog P.O
    ALPLAINS 2013 SEED CATALOG P.O. BOX 489, KIOWA, CO 80117-0489, U.S.A. Three ways to contact us: FAX: (303) 621-2864 (24 HRS.) email: [email protected] website: www.alplains.com Dear Growing Friends: Welcome to our 23rd annual seed catalog! The summer of 2012 was long, hot and brutal, with drought afflicting most of the U.S. Most of my botanical explorations were restricted to Idaho, Wash- ington, Oregon and northern California but even there moisture was below average. In a year like this, seeps, swales, springs, vestigial snowbanks and localized rainstorms became much more important in my search for seeding plants. On the Snake River Plains of southern Idaho and the scab- lands of eastern Washington, early bloomers such as Viola beckwithii, V. trinervata, Ranunculus glaberrimus, Ranunculus andersonii, Fritillaria pudica and Primula cusickiana put on quite a show in mid-April but many populations could not set seed. In northern Idaho, Erythronium idahoense flowered extensively, whole meadows were covered with thousands of the creamy, pendant blossoms. One of my most satisfying finds in the Hells Canyon area had to be Sedum valens. The tiny glaucous rosettes, surround- ed by a ring of red leaves, are a succulent connoisseur’s dream. Higher up, the brilliant blue spikes of Synthyris missurica punctuated the canyon walls. In southern Oregon, the brilliant red spikes of Pedicularis densiflora lit up the Siskiyou forest floor. Further north in Oregon, large populations of Erythronium elegans, Erythronium oregonum ssp. leucandrum, Erythro- nium revolutum, trilliums and sedums provided wonderful picture-taking opportunities. Eriogonum species did well despite the drought, many of them true xerics.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa State Journal of Research 61.2
    oufiiil of Research Volume 61, No. 2 ISSN0092-6345 November, 1986 ISJRA6 61(2) 153-296 1986 From the Editors . 153 ISELY, D. Leguminosae of the United States. Astragalus L.: IV. Species Summary N-Z.. 157 Book Reviews . 291 IOWA STATE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH Published under the auspices of the Vice President for Research, Iowa State University EDITOR .................................................. DUANE ISELY ASSOCIATE EDITOR .............................. KENNETH G. MADISON ASSOCIATE EDITOR ...................................... PAUL N. HINZ ASSOCIATE EDITOR . BRUCE W. MENZEL ASSOCIATE EDITOR ................................... RAND D. CONGER COMPOSITOR-ASSISTANT EDITOR ............... CHRISTINE V. McDANIEL Administrative Board N. L. Jacobson, Chairman J. E. Galejs, I. S. U. Library D. Isely, Editor W. H. Kelly, College of Sciences and Humanities W. R. Madden, Office of Business and Finance J. P. Mahlstede, Agriculture and Horne Economics Experiment Station W. M. Schmitt, Information Service G. K. Serovy, College of Engineering Editorial Board G. J. Musick, Associate Editor for Entomology, University of Arkansas Paul W. Unger, Associate Editor for Agronomy, USDA, Bushland, Texas Dwight W. Bensend, Associate Editor for Forestry, Hale, Missouri L. Glenn Smith, Associate Editor for Education, Northern Illinois Univ. Faye S. Yates, Promotion Specialist, I. S. U. Gerald Klonglan, Consultant for Sociology, I. S. U. All matters pertaining to subscriptions, remittances, etc. should be addressed to the Iowa State University Press, 2121 South State Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010. Most back issues of the IOWA STATE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH are available. Single copies starting with Volume 55 are $7.50 each, plus postage. Prior issues are $4.50 each, plus postage. Because of limited stocks, payment is required prior to shipment.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice
    Steele/Burnand Anza-Borrego Desert Research Center University of California, Irvine UCI – NATURE and UC Natural Reserve System California State Parks – Colorado Desert District Anza-Borrego Desert State Park & Anza-Borrego Foundation Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice (revised 1/31/2019) A gaggle of geneticists in Borrego Palm Canyon – 1975. (L-R, Dr. Theodosius Dobzhansky, Dr. Steve Bryant, Dr. Richard Lewontin, Dr. Steve Jones, Dr. TimEDITOR’S Prout. Photo NOTE by Dr. John Moore, courtesy of Steve Jones) Editor’s Note The publications cited in this volume specifically mention and/or discuss Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, locations and/or features known to occur within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, biological, geological, paleontological or anthropological specimens collected from localities within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, or events that have occurred within those same boundaries. This compendium is not now, nor will it ever be complete (barring, of course, the end of the Earth or the Park). Many, many people have helped to corral the references contained herein (see below). Any errors of omission and comission are the fault of the editor – who would be grateful to have such errors and omissions pointed out! [[email protected]] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As mentioned above, many many people have contributed to building this database of knowledge about Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. A quantum leap was taken somewhere in 2016-17 when Kevin Browne introduced me to Google Scholar – and we were off to the races. Elaine Tulving deserves a special mention for her assistance in dealing with formatting issues, keeping printers working, filing hard copies, ignoring occasional foul language – occasionally falling prey to it herself, and occasionally livening things up with an exclamation of “oh come on now, you just made that word up!” Bob Theriault assisted in many ways and now has a lifetime job, if he wants it, entering these references into Zotero.
    [Show full text]
  • Specificity in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Specificity in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses Mitchell Andrews * and Morag E. Andrews Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-3-423-0692 Academic Editors: Peter M. Gresshoff and Brett Ferguson Received: 12 February 2017; Accepted: 21 March 2017; Published: 26 March 2017 Abstract: Most species in the Leguminosae (legume family) can fix atmospheric nitrogen (N2) via symbiotic bacteria (rhizobia) in root nodules. Here, the literature on legume-rhizobia symbioses in field soils was reviewed and genotypically characterised rhizobia related to the taxonomy of the legumes from which they were isolated. The Leguminosae was divided into three sub-families, the Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae. Bradyrhizobium spp. were the exclusive rhizobial symbionts of species in the Caesalpinioideae, but data are limited. Generally, a range of rhizobia genera nodulated legume species across the two Mimosoideae tribes Ingeae and Mimoseae, but Mimosa spp. show specificity towards Burkholderia in central and southern Brazil, Rhizobium/Ensifer in central Mexico and Cupriavidus in southern Uruguay. These specific symbioses are likely to be at least in part related to the relative occurrence of the potential symbionts in soils of the different regions. Generally, Papilionoideae species were promiscuous in relation to rhizobial symbionts, but specificity for rhizobial genus appears to hold at the tribe level for the Fabeae (Rhizobium), the genus level for Cytisus (Bradyrhizobium), Lupinus (Bradyrhizobium) and the New Zealand native Sophora spp. (Mesorhizobium) and species level for Cicer arietinum (Mesorhizobium), Listia bainesii (Methylobacterium) and Listia angolensis (Microvirga).
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered, Threatened, Extinct, Endemic, and Rare Or Restricted Utah Vascular Plants
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 35 Number 4 Article 1 12-31-1975 Endangered, threatened, extinct, endemic, and rare or restricted Utah vascular plants Stanley L. Welsh Brigham Young University N. Duane Atwood Bureau of Land Management, Cedar City, Utah James L. Reveal University of Maryland, College Park, and Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; and Reveal, James L. (1975) "Endangered, threatened, extinct, endemic, and rare or restricted Utah vascular plants," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 35 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol35/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist Published at Provo, Utah, by Brigham Young University Volume 35 December 31, 1975 No. 4 ENDANGERED, THREATENED, EXTINCT, ENDEMIC, AND RARE OR RESTRICTED UTAH VASCULAR PLANTS Stanley L. Welshi, N. Duane Atwood-, and James L. ReveaP Abstract.— The status of 382 vascular plant taxa with distribution in Utah is presented. Some 66 species are possibly endangered, 198 threatened, 7 extinct, and 20 extirpated within the state; 4 spe- cies have questionable taxonomic status. Included in the list are nearly 225 species of endemic plants, many of which are among the possibly endangered, threatened, and extinct or extirpated plants. Bibliographic citations, type locality, status, and distribution by counties is included for each species or infraspecific taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • PHASEOLUS LESSON ONE PHASEOLUS and the FABACEAE INTRODUCTION to the FABACEAE
    1 PHASEOLUS LESSON ONE PHASEOLUS and the FABACEAE In this lesson we will begin our study of the GENUS Phaseolus, a member of the Fabaceae family. The Fabaceae are also known as the Legume Family. We will learn about this family, the Fabaceae and some of the other LEGUMES. When we study about the GENUS and family a plant belongs to, we are studying its TAXONOMY. For this lesson to be complete you must: ___________ do everything in bold print; ___________ answer the questions at the end of the lesson; ___________ complete the world map at the end of the lesson; ___________ complete the table at the end of the lesson; ___________ learn to identify the different members of the Fabaceae (use the study materials at www.geauga4h.org); and ___________ complete one of the projects at the end of the lesson. Parts of the lesson are in underlined and/or in a different print. Younger members can ignore these parts. WORDS PRINTED IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS may be new vocabulary words. For help, see the glossary at the end of the lesson. INTRODUCTION TO THE FABACEAE The genus Phaseolus is part of the Fabaceae, or the Pea or Legume Family. This family is also known as the Leguminosae. TAXONOMISTS have different opinions on naming the family and how to treat the family. Members of the Fabaceae are HERBS, SHRUBS and TREES. Most of the members have alternate compound leaves. The FRUIT is usually a LEGUME, also called a pod. Members of the Fabaceae are often called LEGUMES. Legume crops like chickpeas, dry beans, dry peas, faba beans, lentils and lupine commonly have root nodules inhabited by beneficial bacteria called rhizobia.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]