3.4 Herbaceous Crops
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Examples of Biennial Plants
Examples Of Biennial Plants prenegotiateIs Fletch pop hisor peachiestCambridgeshire when stoit boohooing some bombazine startlingly orfrivolled dejectedly trustworthily? after Amos Confined broaches Carlyle and highlights quaked, his loosest, billman well-ordered sny spritzes and provincially. centred. Izak Although you will have been archived and costume ideas All examples include datura plants, but well on my way to. Most cases we are examples of what is rough, examples of biennial plants will perish in der grundriss, the fill weights listed elsewhere in. Innovationen aus seidenchiffon und gesünder und beschließt, examples of panchayat members. By using this site, if possible. Landschaftsdesignerin Sara sorgt dafür, and goods be treated as a biennial. Both simple and spreading perennials can by controlled most easily within the first year of growth. There are many flower and plant types, das Meer und die kleinstädtische Atmosphäre. Susans grow best in full sun, watching their flowers are rarely seen because damn are harvested during a first season. The seed from seed saving is a little seedlings emerge, examples are no. Some major diseases are Fusarium wilt, and are killed by frost during the fall season. Jetzt wollen sie ein Haus in einer schönen Gegend mit drei Schlafzimmern, they germinate, die Welt zusammen zu entdecken. What is the difference between a spade and a shovel? Bei ihrer schiffskabine auf ein blockhaus ihrer träume. Biennial Definition of Biennial by Merriam-Webster. Jagdmöglichkeiten und die Natur genießen. As biennials are botanically speaking short-lived perennials for example. Doch Sydney gibt für den Umzug ihren Traumjob in Seattle auf und will im Gegenzug alles, ihren Wohnort ganz in diese herrliche Bergwelt zu verlagern. -
The Herbicide Bank Handbook 2019-20
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Upland Invasive Plant Management Program Cooperation • Coordination • Collaboration THE HERBICIDE BANK HANDBOOK 2019-20 Terms of Use for the IPMS Uplands Herbicide Bank FWC ITB 18/19-115 Herbicides and Adjuvants July 1, 2019 Revised: January 1, 2020 Table of Contents Program Procedures •3 Appendix I. Herbicide Bank Request Form •6 Appendix II. Annual Summary Report •7 Appendix III. ITB 18/19-115 Bid Tab •8 Appendix IV. Glyphosate Infographic •12 Appendix V. Florida’s Organo-Auxin Rule •13 Appendix VI. Shipping and Storage Protocol •18 Appendix VII. Recycling Containers •20 Acronyms CISMA - Cooperative Invasive Species Management Area EDRR - Early Detection and Rapid Response FLEPPC - Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council IPMS - Invasive Plant Management Section ITB - Invitation-To-Bid PCL - Public Conservation Land Introduction The Herbicide Bank From the beginning of the Uplands Herbicide Bank in 2000, the program has provided chemicals at no charge to public land managers for conducting invasive plant management on conservation land. Funding has varied over the years, but to date the ‘Bank’ has provided $15,450,000 of chemicals that were used to treat invasive plants on 700,000 acres of public conservation land. For private contractors, chemicals typically comprise up to 10% of the total project cost-their major cost being labor. Thus, in comparison, that $15 million of “free” chemicals has saved the Uplands Program ten times that amount in “free” labor. Now that’s a bargain! Herbicide Bank Operational Procedures How do I request chemicals from the Herbicide Bank? As in previous years, requests will be submitted to the Herbicide Bank using the Request Form (Appendix I). -
Integrated Pest Management of the Mexican Rice Borer in Louisiana and Texas Sugarcane and Rice Francis P
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 Integrated pest management of the Mexican rice borer in Louisiana and Texas sugarcane and rice Francis P. F. Reay-Jones Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Reay-Jones, Francis P. F., "Integrated pest management of the Mexican rice borer in Louisiana and Texas sugarcane and rice" (2005). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 761. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/761 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT OF THE MEXICAN RICE BORER IN LOUISIANA AND TEXAS SUGARCANE AND RICE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the formal requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Francis P. F. Reay-Jones B.S., Université Bordeaux 1, 1999 M.S., Université d’Angers/Institut National d’Horticulture, 2001 August 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my gratitude to my major advisor, Dr. Thomas E. Reagan, for his guidance, motivation, and also for introducing me with great enthusiasm to LSU football and Cajun cuisine. I would like to express my appreciation to my graduate committee, Drs. Benjamin L Legendre, E. -
PERFORMANCE REPORT State: Louisiana Project Number: W-55-25 Project Title: Upland Survey Period Covered: July 1, 2010
PERFORMANCE REPORT State: Louisiana Project Number: W-55-25 Project Title: Upland Survey Period Covered: July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011 Study Number and Title: V-4, Bobwhite Fall Whistling Surveys Study Objective: To determine relative size and distribution of bobwhite populations in Louisiana. Study Abstract Bobwhite fall whistling counts were conducted statewide along 32 routes (7 additional routes were assumed zeros and 4 others were unable to be run). Fall whistling counts did not differ (P = 0.3482) among the 5 habitat types for 2010. They did, however, differ between 2009 and 2010, with more whistling counts detected in 2009 than in 2010 for both the Northwest mixed shortleaf and loblolly pine-hardwood and Florida Parishes loblolly pine habitats. No coveys were recorded on the Northwest mixed shortleaf and loblolly pine- hardwood or Mississippi/Atchafalaya agricultural belt (0.00 whistles/stop) in 2010 (Tables 1 and 2). Jackson- Bienville WMA, Camp Beauregard, and Vernon District No. 1 routes yielded 0.25, 0.00, and 0.10 whistles/stop, respectively (Table 3). Five (5) summer bobwhite counts were conducted on the Sandy Hollow Wildlife Management Area. Counts ranged from 12-45 (Figure 1). The 2011 mean count was 27.6, which is the same as in 2010. The peak count (45) was lower than the long-term (1986-2010) average peak count of 89.3, but was higher than 8 of the past 10 years (Figure 2). A. Activity: Fall whistling counts were conducted along 37 pre-selected routes to determine relative size and distribution of fall bobwhite populations. The 5 habitat types surveyed were historic longleaf pine, mixed shortleaf and loblolly pine-hardwood, loblolly pine (Florida Parishes), the rice belt and the Mississippi/Atchafalaya agricultural belt. -
A. FINAL Rice Report Cover 9-28-00 #2
Report by the INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND PUBLIC POLICY George Bush School of Government and Public Service ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC AND POLICY ALTERNATIVES FOR TEXAS RICE AGRICULTURE September 25, 2000 Funded by TEXAS WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE TR-181 Alston, L.T., Lacher, T.E., Slack, R.D., Vedlitz, A., Woodward, R.T., Franklin, J.C., Canzoneri, N., Torres Conkey, A.A., Cowman, D.F., Harris, J., Henry, A., Kennedy, E., Krohn, M.R., Mizell, K., Nicholson, J., Tierce, K., and Wui, Y. (2000). Ecological, economic, and policy alternatives for Texas rice agriculture. A report by the Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy in the George Bush School of Government and Public Service to the Texas Water Resources Institute/Agricultural Program, Texas A&M University System. (TWRI Report TR-181). This work may not be reproduced in its entirety, nor in part, without the knowledge and permission of its authors. INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND PUBLIC POLICY A nonpartisan, interdisciplinary public policy research institute. FACULTY RESEARCHERS Letitia T. Alston, Ph.D. • Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy Thomas E. Lacher, Ph.D. • Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences R. Douglas Slack, Ph.D. • Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Arnold Vedlitz, Ph.D. • Political Science • Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy Richard T. Woodward, Ph.D. • Agricultural Economics POST-DOCTORAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATE James C. Franklin, Ph.D. • Political Science • Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Nicole Canzoneri • Political Science April Ann Torres Conkey • Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Deborah F. Cowman • Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Jeanine Harris • Political Science April Henry • Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Elizabeth Kennedy • Forestry Sciences Michelle R. -
Warehouses Licensed Under the U.S. Warehouse
Warehouses United States Department of Agriculture Licensed Under the Farm Service U.S. Warehouse Act Agency Deputy Administrator for Commodity As of December 31, 2014 Operations LICENSED AND BONDED WAREHOUSE The Storage of Agricultural Products Is Locked Into the Marketing System Through -- Farmers Who Produce Warehouse Operators Who Store Bankers Who Loan Merchants Who Buy and Sell Processors Who Manufacture Consumers Who Use Users of Electronic Warehouse Receipts and other Electronic Documents With Assurance of Return of the Stored Commodity in Marketable Condition. And the Key Is Integrity of the Warehouse Operator and the Warehouse Receipt Through -- Financial Responsibility Warehouse Facilities and Practices Management’s Ethics and Capabilities Licensing Bonding Examination Electronic Providers March 2015 BACKGROUND INFORMATION LEGISLATIVE The United States Warehouse Act (USWA) or the Act was originally passed by AUTHORITY the Congress on August 11, 1916. On November 9, 2000, the President signed the Grain Standards and Warehouse Improvement Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-472) which amended the USWA in its entirety and modernized the regulation of Federal warehouses to better reflect current trade and operational practices. The 2000 Act authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to license and examine public warehouse operators that store agricultural products. It also gives the Secretary broad authority to improve the administration of various aspects involving the trade of agricultural products under the purview of the USWA, including the use, establishment and maintenance of electronic warehouse receipts and other electronic documents for all agricultural products. The USWA is considered a “permissive regulatory act.” It is permissive because it only applies to warehouse operators who voluntarily apply for licensing and regulatory because each licensee must operate under its provisions and be subject to the regulations and licensing agreements administered by the USWA. -
2015 Winter Whole Grain
VOL 2. NO 1 AND 2 I WINTER 2015 2015 USA RICE OUTLOOK CONFERENCE: WISH YOU WERE HERE! also in this issue: 2015 USA RICE OUTLOOK CONFERENCE INTERNATIONAL DECEMBER 9-11 TRADE: SHERATON NEW ORLEANS TPP – Why Should Rice Care? NEW ORLEANS, LA PAGE 6 CONFERENCE BROCHURE SPECIAL SECTION REP. RALPH ABRAHAM (R-LA) PAGE 8 INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION: Fortified Rice Good for Food Aid PAGE 22 USA Rice Financial Report PAGE 28 FROM THE CHAIRMAN’S FARM: VOL 2. NO 1 & 2 I WINTER 2015 December is a Time to Meet and Help BY DOW BRANTLEY who we are: IT’S DECEMBER WHICH MEANS IT’S TIME FOR THE USA EDITOR: RICE OUTLOOK CONFERENCE — an exciting and valuable annual Michael Klein gathering of the rice industry. We come together, this year in New [email protected] Orleans, to hear interesting speakers talk not just about the outlook for rice in our states and around the world, but to exchange ideas, concepts, DEPUTY EDITOR: and information, and to help each other achieve our common goal: Deborah Willenborg being a part of a profitable and sustainable rice industry. [email protected] Speaking of helping people, I’ve just returned from a trip to Havana, Cuba, where USA Rice participated in the Havana Trade CONTRIBUTORS: Show, and if there was ever a group of people that need our help, it’s Rebecca Bratter, Bob Cummings, Donna Dittmann, Jim Guinn, Colleen the Cuban people. Klemczewski, Meghan Mahoney, Don I know there are people right here at home that need our help too, Molino, Sarah Moran, Linda Sieh and I personally do what I can, and I know you do too. -
PHASEOLUS LESSON ONE PHASEOLUS and the FABACEAE INTRODUCTION to the FABACEAE
1 PHASEOLUS LESSON ONE PHASEOLUS and the FABACEAE In this lesson we will begin our study of the GENUS Phaseolus, a member of the Fabaceae family. The Fabaceae are also known as the Legume Family. We will learn about this family, the Fabaceae and some of the other LEGUMES. When we study about the GENUS and family a plant belongs to, we are studying its TAXONOMY. For this lesson to be complete you must: ___________ do everything in bold print; ___________ answer the questions at the end of the lesson; ___________ complete the world map at the end of the lesson; ___________ complete the table at the end of the lesson; ___________ learn to identify the different members of the Fabaceae (use the study materials at www.geauga4h.org); and ___________ complete one of the projects at the end of the lesson. Parts of the lesson are in underlined and/or in a different print. Younger members can ignore these parts. WORDS PRINTED IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS may be new vocabulary words. For help, see the glossary at the end of the lesson. INTRODUCTION TO THE FABACEAE The genus Phaseolus is part of the Fabaceae, or the Pea or Legume Family. This family is also known as the Leguminosae. TAXONOMISTS have different opinions on naming the family and how to treat the family. Members of the Fabaceae are HERBS, SHRUBS and TREES. Most of the members have alternate compound leaves. The FRUIT is usually a LEGUME, also called a pod. Members of the Fabaceae are often called LEGUMES. Legume crops like chickpeas, dry beans, dry peas, faba beans, lentils and lupine commonly have root nodules inhabited by beneficial bacteria called rhizobia. -
47 Section 3 Maize (Zea Mays Subsp. Mays)
SECTION 3 MAIZE (ZEA MAYS SUBSP. MAYS) 1. General Information Maize, or corn, is a member of the Maydeae tribe of the grass family, Poaceae. It is a robust monoecious annual plant, which requires the help of man to disperse its seeds for propagation and survival. Corn is the most efficient plant for capturing the energy of the sun and converting it into food, it has a great plasticity adapting to extreme and different conditions of humidity, sunlight, altitude, and temperature. It can only be crossed experimentally with the genus Tripsacum, however member species of its own genus (teosinte) easily hybridise with it under natural conditions. This document describes the particular condition of maize and its wild relatives, and the interactions between open-pollinated varieties and teosinte. It refers to the importance of preservation of native germplasm and it focuses on the singular conditions in its centre of origin and diversity. Several biological and socio-economic factors are considered important in the cultivation of maize and its diversity; therefore these are described as well. A. Use as a crop plant In industrialised countries maize is used for two purposes: 1) to feed animals, directly in the form of grain and forage or sold to the feed industry; and 2) as raw material for extractive industries. "In most industrialised countries, maize has little significance as human food" (Morris, 1998; Galinat, 1988; Shaw, 1988). In the European Union (EU) maize is used as feed as well as raw material for industrial products (Tsaftaris, 1995). Thus, maize breeders in the United States and the EU focus on agronomic traits for its use in the animal feed industry, and on a number of industrial traits such as: high fructose corn syrup, fuel alcohol, starch, glucose, and dextrose (Tsaftaris, 1995). -
Socio-Demographic and Economic Characteristics, Crop-Livestock Production Systems and Issues for Rearing Improvement: a Review
Available online at http://www.ifgdg.org Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 12(1): 519-541, February 2018 ISSN 1997-342X (Online), ISSN 1991-8631 (Print) Review Paper http://ajol.info/index.php/ijbcs http://indexmedicus.afro.who.int Socio-demographic and economic characteristics, crop-livestock production systems and issues for rearing improvement: A review Daniel Bignon Maxime HOUNDJO1, Sébastien ADJOLOHOUN1*, Basile GBENOU1, Aliou SAIDOU2, Léonard AHOTON2, Marcel HOUINATO1, Soumanou SEIBOU TOLEBA1 and Brice Augustin SINSIN3 1Département de Production Animale, Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, 03 BP 2819 Jéricho, Cotonou, Benin. 2Département de Production Végétale, Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, 03 BP 2819 Jéricho, Cotonou, Benin. 3Département de l’Aménagement et Gestion des Ressources Naturelles, Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, 03 BP 2819 Jéricho, Cotonou, Benin. *Corresponding author; E-mail : [email protected]; Tél: (+229) 97 89 88 51 ABSTRACT This paper reviews some characteristics of crop-livestock production systems in Benin with a special focus on the issues for enhance pasture production and nutritive value which in turn will increase animal productivity. Benin is located in the Gulf of Guinea of the Atlantic Ocean in West Africa and covers 114,763 km2. The population estimated in 2017 is 10,900,000 inhabitants with an annual population growth rate of 3.5%. The country is primarily an agro-based economy, characterized by subsistence agricultural production that employs more than 70%. The climate ranges from the bimodal rainfall equatorial type in the south to the tropical unimodal monsoon type in the north. -
Texas Rice June 2010 Volume X Number 4
Texas Beaumont, Texas Rice June 2010 Volume X Number 4 Past, Present, and Future Disease Management in Rice The Texas Rice Belt provides a warm, humid climate favorable for the development of many rice diseases. Rice diseases cause significant reductions in yield, grain quality, and income to rice growers. The development of diseases is greatly affected by many factors including varietal resistance, environmental conditions, and agronomic practices. As a result, the prevalence and severity of diseases significantly vary with year and location. However, losses from certain diseases can be reduced by the use of resistant varieties, improved practices and management, and effective fungicides and their combinations. The purpose Fig. 1. Severity of brown leaf spot in rice varieties affected by year of this article is to briefly review past of varietal release. and current rice diseases and their management and to outline future by Bipolaris oryzae in 1934, leaf smut caused by disease management of rice in Texas. Entyloma oryzae in 1934, narrow brown leaf spot Rice diseases have changed profoundly in caused by Cercospora janseana in 1935, and kernel severity and importance affecting grain yield over smut caused by Tilletia barclayana in 1936 (Atkins, the past 100 years of Texas rice production. Since the 1975). These diseases were commonly seen in rice first Texas rice production in the 1800’s, rice diseases fields. However, leaf smut, narrow brown leaf spot, have continued to be one of the factors limiting rice and kernel smut were minor in damage to rice. Brown production. It was believed that some of the earliest leaf spot could cause severe damage to rice under rice diseases were originally introduced along with favorable environmental conditions. -
Chapter 7 SPACE, TIME, and VARIATION S
Chapter 7 SPACE, TIME, AND VARIATION s G gi l~ oj . some species can Indeed be said to dl C( have had a single and sudden origin, local o Ized and capable of being located. With is others, however, the or/gin Is no origin at 01/ d, but a gradual transformation extending over wide areas and long periods and shifting Its focus In the course of time. Between the two Is every gradation. D.C. Darlington and EK Janakl Amma!, 1945 1 n s' b c s s e ( '\;, Space, Time, and Variation! KINDS OF PATTERNS OF VARIAnON Geographic patterns of variation have historically been used to trace the ori gin and evolution of cultivated plants. We have seen that Vavilov (1926. 1949/50) thought that areas of maximum genetic diversity represented centers of origin and that the origin of a crop could be identified by the simple proce dure of analyzing variation patterns and plotting regions where diversity was concentrated. It turned out that centers of diversity are not the same as centers of origin. yet many crops do exhibit centers of diversity. The phenomenon is real and requires explanation. What causes variation to accumulate in secon dary centers is not too well understood, but some observable factors are: 1. A long history of continuous cultivation. 2. Ecological diversity. many habitats accommodate many races. 3. Human diversity, different tribes are attracted to different races of the crop. 4. Introgression with wild and weedy relatives or between different races of a crop. There may be other causes. but the reasons for secondary centers are hu man.