U.S. Seed Accelerator Rankings Yael V

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S. Seed Accelerator Rankings Yael V U.S. Seed Accelerator Rankings Yael V. Hochberg and Kristen Kamath Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University The goal of the U.S. Seed Accelerator Rankings, now in its second year, is to begin a larger conversation about what makes seed accelerators successful, and to provide startups with a tool to help them decide which seed accelerators are a good match for their needs. The rankings below evaluate the relative success of accelerator programs in the US based on our ranking criteria: Rank Overall 1 Y Combinator 2 TechStars Boulder 3 KickLabs 4 i/o Ventures 5 Excelerate Labs 6 AngelPad 7 TechStars NYC 8 TechStars Boston 9 Launchpad LA 10 500 Startups 11 DreamIt Ventures 12 TechStars Seattle 13 NYC SeedStart 14 Entrepreneurs Roundtable Accelerator 15 The Brandery For the purposes of this study, we define an accelerator as a program that offers mentorship, office space, and a small stipend in exchange for equity. To be included in the rankings, an accelerator program must have defined cohorts and hold fixed duration sessions of less than 1 year, culminating in a demo day for potential investors. This study does not include accelerators that require entrepreneurs to have affiliations with specific universities or minority groups. These accelerators provide young companies with mentorship and help achieve the declared goal of building a powerful network in the early stages of the start-up’s development. Affiliation with the top accelerator programs can also provide a strong branding and certification mechanism for young companies. Evaluation Criteria The greatest benefit of an accelerator is to position start-ups for long term success. As many of the accelerators that are evaluated in this ranking are only in their initial years of existence, we systematically study and evaluate accelerators on a variety of factors that we believe are leading indicators of their success. Our rankings are based on a weighted average of scores in 6 categories: Qualified Financing Activity, Qualified Exits, Reputation with leading VCs, Alumni Network, Equity Taken and Stipend. Qualified Financing Activity occurs when a portfolio company raises an aggregate of at least $350k within 12 months of graduating the accelerator program. We believe that a company raising a significant amount of money in the year following the accelerator program is an early indicator of its potential long term success. The $350K threshold represents a sum of money that exceeds the guaranteed investment capital typically made available to any particular accelerator’s graduates through convertible notes. The ranking utilizes the percentage of program alumni companies that have had a qualified financing activity. Qualified Exit occurs when a portfolio company either issues an IPO or is acquired for an amount such that the founders earn at least $1M. A qualified exit indicates that the company has matured to the point where the entrepreneur and other investors can cash out if they wish. The $1M threshold represents a sum of money that would materially affect an entrepreneur’s life. The ranking utilizes the percentage of program alumni companies that had a qualified exit. Reputation with VCs was determined by systematically coding interviews with VCs; for each VC participating, the coding scheme assessed and scored the accelerator based on the level of VC awareness regarding the program and the VC’s assessment of aspects of the program such as the quality of mentorship or usefulness of alumni network. Multiple VCs across the US were interviewed in order for this portion of the ranking, as well as to understand their perspective of what makes for a successful accelerator program. Alumni Network is the number of companies that have graduated from the program; a strong alumni network serves as a significant asset and offers an important base of contacts and resources for future business development. In this study, we evaluated accelerators that had a minimum of 10 alumni by the end of 2011. Equity Taken by the accelerator is the percentage of company equity that the startup gives to the accelerator in return for the stipend and program participation. Stipend is the dollar amount of cash provided by the accelerator to the entrepreneurs to support their activities and living expenses during the program. Category Rankings A number of accelerator programs are distinctive in particular categories. TechStars Boulder and KickLabs had the highest percentage of qualified exits. TechStars New York and Kick Labs had the highest percentage of companies make qualified financing events. In the eyes of the venture capitalists we interviewed, the Y Combinator program stands out as having the highest reputation and quality among the accelerators, with a number of our interviewees viewing them as being in a league of their own. Other include TechStars Boulder in this top echelon as well. Both Y Combinator and TechStars Boulder are perceived to have outstanding mentors to help companies build high potential businesses. However, the VCs we interviewed also expressed concern that this same reputation can build a hype around demo day that can sometimes create artificial demand and overly-high valuations that can impose difficulties for startups in follow-on rounds of financing. Y Combinator also has the largest alumni network among the accelerators ranked in this study. Founded in 2005, Y Combinator has nearly three times the number of alumni of all four Tech Stars locations put together as of year-end of 2011. TechStars has also seen explosive growth over the last few years. Originating with the very successful TechStars Boulder in 2007, TechStars has since launched TechStars Boston in 2009, TechStars Seattle and TechStars New York in 2010, and TechStars Cloud in San Antonio in 2012. Notably, however, not all of the top fifteen accelerators have such large alumni networks. In fact, about half of the top 15 accelerators were founded in just the past two years, with alumni networks of less than 25 companies. Additional Observations and Insights The following are observations and insights from the ranking process that are not formally included in the metrics above, but noteworthy information for both entrepreneurs and accelerator programs. 2012 has seen a proliferation of accelerator programs across the US. Many of these programs are too early in stage to rank, as they have not yet produced alumni classes that can be used in our evaluation. The VCs interviewed in this study mentioned a number of notable new programs that they believe will ultimately become successful. These include TechStars Cloud in San Antonio, Launch Pad Ignition, and The Microsoft Accelerator for Kinect. Another emerging trend in the accelerator world is a focus on industry verticals. Many of the new emerging accelerator programs have a strong bias toward a specific industry (e.g. Healthcare, Energy, Big Data & Cloud, etc. ). This contrasts starkly with the more generalist model adopted by earlier accelerator programs. Notable accelerator programs in this category include: a) Healthcare: Healthbox (2012), Blueprint Health (2012), Rock Health (2011) b) Energy: Surge Accelerator(2012), Green Start (2011) c) Big Data & Enterprise: TechStars Cloud (2012), Acceleprise (2012) Another example is a new accelerator program in which Microsoft has partnered with TechStars to mentor startups that will build creative applications using the Kinect for Windows platform. This partnership model is interesting as it helps start ups build viable businesses around an emerging technology backed by a large enterprise. Finally, this study observed that location is another consideration for both entrepreneurs and accelerator programs. Nearly all the accelerator programs examined in this study require the entrepreneur to be located in proximity to the accelerator program location, or to relocate there temporarily for the duration of the program. Entrepreneurs may be tempted to choose among accelerator programs located in their near vicinity. However, some of the VCs who participated in interviews for this study mentioned they primarily choose to attend demo days based on physical proximity and convenience. Graduates of accelerators located in areas that do not have active VC communities may thus be at a disadvantage from an awareness standpoint, relative to those located in active VC clusters. Disclaimer Information on the ranking criteria inputs was not available directly from the accelerators for five of the accelerators ranked in our study: AngelPad, Entrepreneurs Roundtable Accelerator, Capital Factory, Launchpad LA, and Y Combinator. As a result, the inputs for these accelerators in this ranking are compiled from publicly available information and proprietary databases available to the authors. The accelerators included in this ranking project were 500 Startups, AlphaLab, AngelPad, Betaspring, BoomStartup, The Brandery, Capital Factory, DreamIt Ventures, Entrepreneurs Roundtable Accelerator, Excelerate Labs, i/o Ventures, Jumpstart Foundry, KickLabs, LaunchHouse, Launchpad LA, NYC SeedStart, TechStars Boston, TechStars Boulder, TechStars NYC, TechStars Seattle, Tech Wildcatters, and Y Combinator. About the Authors The primary research for this study was conducted by Kristen Kamath, a second year MBA candidate at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, under the guidance of Prof. Yael Hochberg of the Kellogg School of Management. These rankings represent the views of the authors, and not those of the Kellogg School of Management or Northwestern University. .
Recommended publications
  • Startup-Finanzierung Und Anzeichen Einer Neuen Dot-Com-Blase
    Ausarbeitung Moritz Philip Recke Startup-Finanzierung und Anzeichen einer neuen dot-com-Blase Fakultät Technik und Informatik Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science Department Informatik Department of Computer Science Moritz Philip Recke Startup-Finanzierung und Anzeichen einer neuen dot-com-Blase Ausarbeitung eingereicht im Rahmen der Ringvorlesung “InnovationCity 2030” im Sommersemester 2015 im Studiengang Master of Arts - Next Media am Department Informatik der Fakultät Technik und Informatik der Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg Betreuender Prüfer : Professor Dr. Kai von Luck Abgegeben am 11.05.2015 Fakultät Technik und Informatik Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science Department Informatik Department of Computer Science Autor Moritz Philip Recke Thema der Ausarbeitung Startup-Finanzierung und Anzeichen einer erneuten dot-com-Blase Stichworte Accelerator, Akquisition, Angel, Angel Investor, Boom, Börsengang, Business Angel, crowdfunding, dot-com-Blase, Exit, Finanzierung, Family & Friends, Finanzkrise, Förderung, Gründer, Inkubator, Investitionen, Investor, IPO, Micro Startup, Niedrigzinsphase, Phasen, Regulation Fair Disclosure, Regulierung, Risiko, Sarbane-Oxley, Seed, Series A, Skalierung, Startup, Startup Monitor, Startup Phasen, Unternehmensbewertung, Venture Capital, VC, Verkauf, Wirtschaftskrise Abstract Startups und ihr hohes, innovatives Potential (vgl. Bundesregierung 2013, bundesregierung.de) werden aufgrund der medialen Aufmerksamkeit, schier unglaublich erscheinender Skalierungseffekte und daraus
    [Show full text]
  • Read Dissertation
    Doctoral Dissertation: The Journey towards a Growing Diffusion of Entrepreneurship Learning and Culture in Society Written by: Mirta Michilli Role DETAILS Author Name: Mirta Michilli, PhD Year: 2019 Title: The Journey towards a Growing Diffusion of Entrepreneurship Learning and Culture in Society Document type: Doctoral dissertation Institution: The International School of Management (ISM) URL: https://ism.edu/images/ismdocs/dissertations/michilli-phd- dissertation-2019.pdf International School of Management Ph.D. Program The Journey towards a Growing Diffusion of Entrepreneurship Learning and Culture in Society PhD Dissertation PhD candidate: Mirta Michilli 21st December 2019 Acknowledgments I wish to dedicate this work to Prof. Tullio De Mauro who many years ago believed in me and gave me the permission to add this challenge to the many I face every day as General Director of Fondazione Mondo Digitale. The effort I have sustained for many years has been first of all for myself, to satisfy my desire to learn and improve all the time, but it has also been for my fifteen year old son Rodrigo, who is building his life and to whom I wish the power of remaining always curious, hungry for knowledge, and capable of working hard and sacrificing for his dreams. I could have not been able to reach this doctorate without the support of my family: my mother, for having being present all the time I needed to be away, my sister, for showing me how to undertake continuous learning challenges and, above all, my beloved husband to whom I owe most of what I know and for dreaming with me endlessly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bay Area Innovation System Science and the Impact of Public Investment
    The Bay Area Innovation System Science and the Impact of Public Investment March 2019 Acknowledgments This report was prepared for the Bay Area Science and Jamie Lawrence, IBM Corporate Citizenship Manager – Innovation Consortium (BASIC) by Dr. Sean Randolph, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Utah, Washington Senior Director at the Bay Area Council Economic Daniel Lockney, Program Executive – Technology Transfer, Institute. Valuable assistance was provided by Dr. Dorothy NASA Miller, former Deputy Director of Innovation Alliances at Dr. Daniel Lowenstein, Executive Vice Chancellor and the University of California Office of the President and Provost, University of California San Francisco Naman Trivedi, a consultant to the Institute. Additional Dr. Kaspar Mossman, Director of Communications and support was provided by Estevan Lopez and Isabel Marketing, QB3 Monteleone, Research Analysts at the Institute. Dr. Patricia Olson, VP for Discovery & Translation, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine In addition to the members of BASIC’s board of Vanessa Sigurdson, Partnership Development, Autodesk directors, which provided review and commentary throughout the research process, the Economic Institute Dr. Aaron Tremaine, Department Head, Accelerator Technology Research, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory particularly wishes to thank the following individuals whose expertise, input and advice made valuable Eric Verdin, President & CEO, Buck Institute for Research on Aging contributions to the analaysis: Dr. Jeffrey Welser, Vice President & Lab Director, IBM Dr. Arthur Bienenstock, Special Assistant to the President for Research – Almaden Federal Policy, Stanford University Jim Brase, Deputy Associate Director for Programs, Computation Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory About BASIC Tim Brown, CEO, IDEO BASIC is the science and technology affiliate of the Doug Crawford, Managing Director, Mission Bay Capital Bay Area Council and the Bay Area Council Economic Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • How Business Startup Accelerators Envision Their Future
    Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Rabat, Morocco, April 11-13, 2017 How Business Startup Accelerators Envision their Future Ana Clara Carvalho Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica e Industrial Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa Caparica, Portugal [email protected] António Grilo Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica e Industrial and UNIDEMI Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa Caparica, Portugal [email protected] Joaquim P. Pina Departamento de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas and CEFAGE-FCT/UNL Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa Caparica, Portugal [email protected] Aneesh Zutshi Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica e Industrial and UNIDEMI Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa Caparica, Portugal [email protected] Abstract Accelerators have become an important agent for the growth of new Startups across the world. They provide training and mentorship to startups and help them find investors. However the very nature of accelerators is evolving as they are trying to evolve sustainable Business Models. Through an in depth literature review, we try to explore a deeper understanding about the various types of Accelerators across the world and how they help startups. Also, through a worldwide survey to accelerators landscape, we identify their opinion about major challenges for the future, and through statistical exploration, provide an anatomy of these entrepreneurial firms. Therefore, this research provides a complete portrait on accelerators, regarding their business models, strategies and challenges for the future. Keywords Accelerators, Survey, Nonlinear Principal Components 1. Motivation It is believed that entrepreneurial activity is related to the economic growth, but there is still a lack of theoretical foundation and the community would benefit a lot from further research being conducted (Hochberg, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE to Doing Business on the US East Coast for Dutch Companies Information for Small and Medium Enterprises, Startups, and Scale-Ups 2 Contents
    LOPENDE TITEL 1 GUIDE TO Doing Business on the US East Coast for Dutch Companies Information for small and medium enterprises, startups, and scale-ups 2 Contents Introduction 5 Foreword Ambassador Haspels 6 Foreword Pauline Dirkmaat 7 Chapter 1: An introduction to the US East Coast 8 1 The US East Coast: a Great Place for Internationalizing Companies 9 2 East Coast vs. West Coast 10 3 Business Culture 11 4 Dutch Government Network on the East Coast 12 Chapter 2: Practical Information for Setting Up a Business on the US East Coast 13 1 Legal Aspects 14 1.1 The three Levels of Law & Incorporation 14 1.2 Immigration: Getting to and Staying in the US 14 1.3 Insurance 15 2 Finance and Banking 15 3 Human Resources 15 4 Communication and Networking 16 4.1 Communication Tips 16 4.2 Networking Tips 17 5 Practical Tips for Startups 18 5.1 Raising Capital 18 5.2 Pitching 19 5.3 Other Resources for Startups 20 Chapter 3: Boston 21 1 Introduction 22 2 Why Boston? 23 3 Key Sectors in Boston 23 3.1 Life Sciences and Health 23 3.2 Cleantech 24 3.3 Artificial Intelligence 24 3.4 Robotics 25 3.5 Edtech, FinTech and Cybersecurity 25 4 Startup Ecosystem Drivers 26 5 Other Resources 28 Chapter 4: New York City 30 1 A Brief Background 31 2 Why New York City? 31 3 Key Sectors & Opportunities 32 3.1 Finance, FinTech & Cybersecurity 32 3.2 Life Sciences and Health and Biotech 32 3.3 Creative Industries 33 3.4 Manufacturing 34 3.5 Circular Economy & Resiliency 34 3.6 Cleantech & Energy 35 3.7 Water Management & Resiliency 35 4 Startups and Scale-ups 35 5 New York Online Resources 38 CONTENTS 3 Chapter 5: Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Startup Factories. the Rise of Accelerator Programmes
    Discussion paper: June 2011 The Startup Factories The rise of accelerator programmes to support new technology ventures Paul Miller and Kirsten Bound NESTA is the UK’s foremost independent expert on how innovation can solve some of the country’s major economic and social challenges. Its work is enabled by an endowment, funded by the National Lottery, and it operates at no cost to the government or taxpayer. NESTA is a world leader in its field and carries out its work through a blend of experimental programmes, analytical research and investment in early- stage companies. www.nesta.org.uk Executive summary Over the past six years, a new method of incubating technology startups has emerged, driven by investors and successful tech entrepreneurs: the accelerator programme. Despite growing interest in the model from the investment, business education and policy communities, there have been few attempts at formal analysis.1 This report is a first step towards a more informed critique of the phenomenon, as part of a broader effort among both public and private sectors to understand how to better support the growth of innovative startups. The accelerator programme model comprises five main features. The combination of these sets it apart from other approaches to investment or business incubation: • An application process that is open to all, yet highly competitive. • Provision of pre-seed investment, usually in exchange for equity. • A focus on small teams not individual founders. • Time-limited support comprising programmed events and intensive mentoring. • Cohorts or ‘classes’ of startups rather than individual companies. The number of accelerator programmes has grown rapidly in the US over the past few years and there are signs that more recently, the trend is being replicated in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • SILICON VALLEY Playbook
    © 2017 | The official magazine for Published by the Consulate General of the Netherlands in San Francisco Dutch businesses visiting Silicon Valley SILICON VALLEY playbook René Bonvanie of Palo Alto Networks shares his insights for startups coming to Silicon Valley fix your cap table! WHAT INVESTORS Flyr founder Alexander Mans explains how he managed WANTto build a successful business inTO Silicon Valley KNOW Everything you have always wanted to know talk founder about moving to San Francisco to founder Super Evil Megacorp Co-founder Tommy Krul on his adventures as a Dutch Game Coder in Silicon Valley taking the big plunge super evil megacorp Plus: Plus: Plus: Plus: prepare your go build that work hard, read about the journey with a killer pitch play hard: the other side of visual toolbox deck best spots at night silicon valley Foreword You are in charge of 02 your own success! The Inside Silicon Valley Playbook Thank you to the following people was published by the Consulate (without you this magazine could General of the Netherlands in San never have been created!): Silicon Valley is a unique place. The buzz is palpable and infectious. Francisco Competition is relentless. Everyone is working on something big. The Consulate General of the More about Production, design, content and Netherlands in San Francisco : Everywhere you look there are people who can help enrich your interviews by 30X Amsterdam and Gerbert Kunst | Michiel Engelaar | experience. And everyone is willing to share in order to help Startup Delta Business Models Inc. San Francisco Jasper Smit | Alexander Kramer others succeed. For general information about this Investors, founders and experts: publication, please contact us.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    INDEX 10x rule 122 angel investments 168–9, 172, 387 42patents.com 412 angel investors 135, 168–70, 185 70:30 rule 74 angel round 169–70 99designs 151, 411, 412 AngelList 169, 414 500 Startups 116, 179 AngelPad 116 anti-dilution clause 228–9 accelerators 154, 177–9 aperiodic discounting 393 accounting system 149 Apollo 274, 416 accruing dividends clause 230 Apple 25, 27, 30, 124, 149, 150, add-on business model 392 305, 308, 333 ADHD 23 arbitrage 400 Adobe Fill & Sign 49 ArcelorMittal 400 advertising 7, 338 as-a-service models 393 advisory board 267–8 ask-me-anything (AMA) session 73 adwords.google.com 421 assuming the sale 98 affiliate marketing 120, 398 atlassian.com 412 after-sales 99 attitude, positive 51–2 agencyanalytics.com 422 attorneys 154 age of entrepreneurs 27–31 auction pricing 393 aggregation strategy 331 Audible 40 agile business development 306–7, 309 audible.com 67, 415 AgoraPulse 53, 418 audio blogs 67 Airbnb 8, 30, 121, 124, 132, 333, 398, 400 audiobooks 40, 67, 414 airport test 251–2 audit, legal 201 Alchemist 116 automatic personal website generators 46 alcohol 38–9 aweber.com 421 Ali, Muhammad 333 Alibaba 27 backdoor reference 280 Allen & Company 181 back-of-the-envelope calculation alliances 345 13, 125, 344 all-or-nothing 342 backstop 248 AltaVista 210 Balachandra, Lakshmi 216 Amazon 1-Click Ordering 391 barriers to entry 123 Amazon 27, 65, 124, 150, 153, 160, 246, 331, Beckman, Finn Paavo 341 334, 343, 396, 414 Bentley cars 128, 401 Amazon AssociatesCOPYRIGHTED 398 Berkus MATERIAL method 223 Amazon Cloud Drive
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Work Growthenabler Report 2020
    Private & Confidential 2020 The Future of Work GrowthEnabler Report 2020 The growing adoption of digital technologies is fueling a new paradigm - Remote Working.The enormous power of data combined with AI in the workplace has created new business and economic models - On/Off balance sheet talent management. What changes could be in store for the workplace, the workforce, and the nature of work itself? CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by GrowthEnabler™ and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended GrowthEnabler™ audience or other intended recipients. This presentation may contain information that is confidential, proprietary or otherwise legally protected, and it may not be further copied, distributed or publicly displayed without the express written permission of GrowthEnabler™ or its affiliates. ©2020 GrowthEnabler™ and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Private & Confidential An AI-powered digital insights-engine & solution sourcing marketplace GrowthEnabler is an AI powered insights and solutions sourcing platform with strategic advisory arm that enables Global Enterprises to rapidly source digital solutions, and engage new and innovative vendors from the digital economy We create strategic insights on the digital economy and provide real-time analysis on over 500 thousand global digital vendors. Our clients rely on us to save them time and money using AI, to enhance their digital innovation and decision making capabilities. Partner, Invest and Procure.
    [Show full text]
  • EJMBE-10-2017-0029 Proof 217..234
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2444-8494.htm Evidence on New evidence on accelerator accelerator performance based on funding performance and location Lydia Canovas-Saiz, Isidre March-Chorda and 217 Rosa Maria Yague-Perales€ ’ Received 23 October 2017 Facultat d Economia, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain Revised 12 July 2018 26 March 2019 22 October 2019 Abstract 18 January 2020 Purpose – Seed accelerators (SAs) appear as a more advanced version of business incubators. These for-profit Accepted 19 January 2020 organizations in exchange of equity, help setting new start-ups by providing mentoring and funding during its first months. Due to their emergent nature, the impact and expectations of SAs remains largely unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to throw new light on this field by empirically assessing for the first time the performance and prospects of these organizations through a survey of 116 SAs. Design/methodology/approach – A model based on the Business Incubators literature is built with four categories covering size, location, age and profitability variables, leading to two hypotheses to be tested empirically over a survey of 116 SAs. Findings – Some remarkable findings arise after implementation of both bivariate and multivariate analysis. The results confirm a higher size and performance in the US and in the oldest SAs at statistically significant levels. Research limitations/implications – The study is not free from limitations but the findings make a contribution to the still scarce existing literature on SAs, and provide some managerial implications to their stockholders, to investors and to entrepreneurs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cambrian Moment
    SPECIAL REPORT TECH STARTUPS January 18th 2014 A Cambrian moment 20140118_SRStartups.indd 1 07/01/2014 12:38 The search for Higgs boson. What does it take to support such immense data storage? HUAWEI OceanStor STORAGE SYSTEM A BETTER WAY Massive read-write ability and scalability for big data. To find out more, please visit: enterprise.huawei.com SPECIAL REPORT TECH STARTUPS A Cambrian moment Cheap and ubiquitous building blocks for digital products and services have caused an explosion in startups. Ludwig Siegele weighs its signicance ABOUT 540M YEARS ago something amazing happened on planet Earth: life forms began to multiply, leading to what is known as the Cam• brian explosion. Until then sponges and other simple creatures had the planet largely to themselves, but within a few million years the animal kingdom became much more varied. This special report will argue that something similar is now hap• pening in the virtual realm: an entrepreneurial explosion. Digital start• ups are bubbling up in an astonishing variety of services and products, penetrating every nook and cranny of the economy. They are reshaping entire industries and even changing the very notion of the rm. Software is eating the world, says Marc Andreessen, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist. This digital feeding frenzy has given rise to a global move• ment. Most big cities, from Berlin CONTENTS and London to Singapore and Amman, now have a sizeable 3 Creating a business startup colony (ecosystem). Be• Testing, testing tween them they are home to 4 Venture capitalists hundreds of startup schools (ac• From leafy to lofty celerators) and thousands of co• working spaces where ca ein• 5 Accelerators ated folk in their 20s and 30s toil Getting up to speed hunched over their laptops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creative Entrepreneurship E-Learning Landscape Report
    The Creative Entrepreneurship E-Learning Landscape Report 2019-2020 CONTENTS Introduction 4 What We Heard: ELab Focus Groups and ELab 1:1 Interviews Report Methodology 5 ELab Focus Groups 49 Global Trends In Entrepreneurship ELab 1:1 Interviews 64 Today’s Global Entrepreneurial Landscape 7 Conclusion 69 Trends in Entrepreneurship 11 Creative Entrepreneurship Trends 15 About The Authors 79 Global E-learning Acknowledgments 81 Overview 19 83 The trend for Lifelong Learning: Adult Education Today 20 Sources Disruption in Higher-ed 24 Key resources 88 U.S. E-learning Appendix 89 Trend Highlights 27 Glossary 90 Methods, Models & Platforms 30 Entrepreneurial Support and E-Learning E-learning for Creative Entrepreneurs 46 The objective of this research report is to present the global trends methodology impacting E-learning today and identify opportunities therein to Using a combination of desk research and ethnographic Secondary research support entrepreneurs. This report also aims to identify the tools methods we identified trends, needs, and opportunities and resources most desired by creative entrepreneurs from both a in the creative e-learning marketplace. student and market perspective to identify the best point of entry. Over a two month period, we conducted one-on-one interviews and focus groups. We targeted creative entrepreneurs, industry professionals, and service online research literature research providers. We completed secondary research to identify current market offerings and trends including accredited and non-accredited programs, incubator and accelerator Primary research offerings, and e-learning marketplaces. The synthesis from the focus groups and one-on-one interviews are included in this report as are the tools and raw data links in the appendix.
    [Show full text]