DOCSLIB.ORG

Homeric Kinship on the Margins of the Oikos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Homeric Kinship on the Margins of the Oikos View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship@Western Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 12-2-2016 12:00 AM Homeric Kinship on the Margins of the Oikos Tim Wright The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Christopher Brown The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Classics A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Tim Wright 2016 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Tim, "Homeric Kinship on the Margins of the Oikos" (2016). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 4281. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4281 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract ! Homeric scholarship has a long history dating back to the 19th century of elucidating Homeric poetry through examining its kinship structures and how kinship is performed. Of particular note has been the focus on the father-child dynamic both per se and with respect to its widespread use as a prototype for a diverse range of relationships. Agamemnon, for example, can be profitably viewed as a kind of dysfunctional father to the Achaeans, and many of the Odyssey’s characters are implicitly judged based on the extent to which they fill the role of the gentle father (ēpios patēr) in various ways. Central to all of this scholarship, however, has been the essentially structural assumption that kinship is a binary concept. Some people are related; others are not. However, recent anthropology has exploded this idea of ‘pseudo-kinship’, concluding that ‘relatedness’, the belief that someone even outside of one’s genetic or marital family is kin, is a more accurate measure of how kinship actually works than more prescriptive approaches have been. In light of these conclusions, I attempt to expand upon our understanding of how kinship is portrayed in the Homeric poems by taking claims of relatedness more seriously. In a series of studies, I examine how more marginal relationships, those potentially outside of the patrilocal joint family, namely those involving bastards, slaves, and fugitives, function nonetheless as kinship relations. My model for this approach will be the oikos, with the father at its centre. Homeric kinship is portrayed as centripetal, with its various members jockeying for position relative to the patriarch. With this in mind, I focus especially on how my marginal subjects negotiate their position and how their role is portrayed with respect to the patriarch of their oikos. ! ! Keywords ! Homer, Epic, Kinship, Family, Bastardy, Slavery, Exile, Relatedness, Teucer, Heracles, Eumaeus, Odysseus, Phoenix, Achilles, Archaic Greece. !i Epigraph ! !Patria est, ubicumque est bene. !“One’s fatherland is wherever things go well.” – Pacuvius fr. 250 Schierl ! ! "ὸ "ᾶ% ῥικ)ᾶ% *+,-).% µ).µ/)+0+1 !οἶκ2% 4ὰ6 ἄ6'8"2% ἀ,.:;<% (.ὶ >?,2% !“Recall what the shrivelled tortoise said: for truly the best oikos is also one’s own.” – Cercidas fr. 7 Lomiento = 2 Powell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !ii Acknowledgments ! Many thanks to my dissertation and examination committees, including Profs. Thomas Lennon, Randall Pogorzelski, Charles Stocking, Aara Suksi, and Ruth Scodel, who drove from Michigan and back in the same day in order to attend the examination. Particular gratitude is owed to three groups. First, the UWO Department of Classics. As those of you who know me well are aware, my first couple of years here were not the easiest. But I feel very strongly that the whole department rallied around me in a way that was remarkable in my experience. One of strengths of this department is its ability to support its own without coddling them. Second, my supervisor Prof. Chris Brown, who has been a mentor and, really, a benefactor when you consider all the books he has lent me – some of which I even intend to return someday. And he has also been a good friend when I’ve needed it the most. And finally my wife Heather and our unborn child. Having spent so much time thinking about families over the past number of years, it is fulfilling now to have one of my own. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !iii Table of Contents ! Abstract and Keywords…………………………………………………………………….i Epigraph…………………………………………………………………………………...ii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………iii Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………iv Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………………...v Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1: Bastards………………………………………………………………………23 1.1: The Nothos…………………………………………………………………………..23 1.2: Teucer……………………………………………………………………………….48 1.3: Heracles……………………………………………………………………………..70 Chapter 2: Eumaeus……………………………………………………………………...88 Chapter 3: Phoenix and Achilles as Exiles……………………………………………..149 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………..187 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………190 Curriculum Vitae………………………………………………………………………..223 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !iv Abbreviations ! I retain the traditional English spelling for Greek proper nouns. Greek words are transliterated unless a specific context is being quoted. I generally follow the LSJ and Oxford Latin Dictionary in abbreviating ancient sources, but sometimes I expand these in cases of potential ambiguity. Periodicals are abbreviated according to l’Année !philologique. Other abbreviations are as follows: ! DK: Diels, H. and W. Kranz. (1960). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 10th ed. Berlin: ! Weidmann. !FGrH: Jacoby, F. (1950-8). Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker. Leiden: Brill. HE: Finkelberg, M., ed. (2011). The Homer Encyclopedia. Chichester, West Sussex; ! Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. !IG: (1903- ). Inscriptiones Graecae. LfgrE: Snell, B. and U. Fleischer, eds. (1955-2010). Lexikon des frühgriechischen Epos. ! Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. LIMC: Ackermann, H.C. and J.-R. Gisler, eds. (1981-1997). Lexicon Iconographicum ! Mythologiae Classicae. Zürich: Artemis. LSJ: Liddell, G.H., et al., eds. (1968). A Greek-English Lexicon. 9th ed. with supplement. ! Oxford: OUP. PMGF: Davies, M., ed. (1991). Poetarum Melicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Vol. 1. ! New York: OUP. TrGF: (1971-2004). Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & !Ruprecht. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !v !1 INTRODUCTION This project’s objective is to expand our understanding of the portrayal of the social dynamic of the Homeric oikos (‘household’) by examining figures on its margins, namely bastards (especially Teucer and Heracles), Eumaeus in his role as slave, and Phoenix as exile. Fundamental to this study will be the assumption that these characters are portrayed as the kin of the central patrilines of their oikoi, namely Telamon/Ajax, Zeus, Laertes/Odysseus/Telemachus, and Peleus/Achilles respectively. This assumption runs against prevailing attitudes about Homeric kinship, and to some extent kinship in antiquity overall, which has tended to be treated as a binary category. For any given individual, a prescribed group of people are family, and everyone else is not. Recent social anthropology, however, has shown this idea to be problematic, and it should be fruitful to examine how a more mobile and contextual approach to the portrayal of kinship in Homeric poetry can elucidate the relationships between individual characters within various kinship groups. Most importantly I observe that kinship, like much in Homeric poetry, is both the basis for and subject of continual negotiation and struggle. Kinship groups can unite against a common enemy, but they are just as capable of internecine discord and even fatal violence.1 There is constant jockeying for position, perhaps most easily observable among a group’s marginal members, who are striving to belong. But these marginal members are no less kin for all that. Their position is simply less secure than that of the more central members. The difference is one of degree rather than kind. By Homeric poetry, I mean the Iliad and Odyssey. Other evidence, especially from 1 See Herzfeld (1985, 11-13) on the tendency of feuding kin groups in a modern Cretan village to come together in the face of an external threat. !2 Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns, and the fragments and epitomes of the epic cycle, will also prove useful, especially when, as with bastards, for example, the evidence in Homer is fairly slight. I will also use later (and especially Athenian) evidence, but only for comparative and supplementary purposes. By itself, later evidence can prove nothing. But when used cautiously in conjunction with evidence from the poetry itself, there can be a cumulative effect. It is now almost universally accepted that the Iliad and Odyssey represent crystallized forms of oral traditions.2 The different epic traditions, represented by Homeric epic, the Hesiodic corpus, and at least the earlier of the Homeric Hymns, are seen as representations of the same bardic practice. There is a growing trend that views these early corpora as “potentially allusive to shared aspects of mytho-poetic traditions, including mythological narratives and the epic phraseology commonly employed to express them.”3 Furthermore, “the relative date of two texts may not well replicate the relative date of their respective performance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land of Myth Odyssey Players
    2 3 ἄνδρα µοι ἔννεπε, µοῦσα, πολύτροπον, ὃς µάλα πολλὰ πλάγχθη, ἐπεὶ Τροίης ἱερὸν πτολίεθρον ἔπερσεν· πολλῶν δ᾽ ἀνθρώπων ἴδεν ἄστεα καὶ νόον ἔγνω, πολλὰ δ᾽ ὅ γ᾽ ἐν πόντῳ πάθεν ἄλγεα ὃν κατὰ θυµόν, ἀρνύµενος ἥν τε ψυχὴν καὶ νόστον ἑταίρων. Homer’s Odyssey, Book 1, Lines 1-5 (ΟΜΗΡΟΥ ΟΔΥΣΣΕΙΑ, ΡΑΨΟΔΙΑ 1, ΣΤΙΧΟΙ 1-5) CREDITS INDEX Credits – The Land of Myth™ Team Written & Designed by: John R. Haygood Art Direction: George Skodras, Ali Dogramaci Who We Are .............................................................................................. 6 Cover Art: Ali Dogramaci What is this Product ................................................................................. 6 Proofreading & Editing: Vi Huntsman (MRC) This is a product created by Seven Thebes in collaboration with the Getty Museum Introduction ................................................................................................ 7 in Los Angeles, USA. Special thanks for the many hours of game testing and brainstorming: Safety and Consent .................................................................................. 10 Thanasis Giannopoulos, Alexandros Stivaktakis, Markos Spanoudakis The Land of Myth Mechanics: A Rules-Light Version ...................... 12 First Edition First Release: November 2020 Telemachos and His Quest ................................................................... 24 Character Sheets ...................................................................................... 26 Playtest Material V0.3 Please note that this game is still
    [Show full text]
  • Essay 2 Sample Responses
    Classics / WAGS 23: Second Essay Responses Grading: I replaced names with a two-letter code (A or B followed by another letter) so that I could read the essays anonymously. I grouped essays by levels of success and cross-read those groups to check that the rankings were consistent. Comments on the assignment: Writers found all manner of things to focus on: Night, crying, hospitality, the return of princes from the dead (Hector, Odysseus), and the exchange of bodies (Hector, Penelope). Here are four interesting and quite different responses: Essay #1: Substitution I Am That I Am: The Nature of Identity in the Iliad and the Odyssey The last book of the Iliad, and the penultimate book of the Odyssey, both deal with the issue of substitution; specifically, of accepting a substitute for a lost loved one. Priam and Achilles become substitutes for each others' absent father and dead son. In contrast, Odysseus's journey is fraught with instances of him refusing to take a substitute for Penelope, and in the end Penelope makes the ultimate verification that Odysseus is not one of the many substitutes that she has been offered over the years. In their contrasting depictions of substitution, the endings of the Iliad and the Odyssey offer insights into each epic's depiction of identity in general. Questions of identity are in the foreground throughout much of the Iliad; one need only try to unravel the symbolism and consequences of Patroclus’ donning Achilles' armor to see how this is so. In the interaction between Achilles and Priam, however, they are particularly poignant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology (2007)
    P1: JzG 9780521845205pre CUFX147/Woodard 978 0521845205 Printer: cupusbw July 28, 2007 1:25 The Cambridge Companion to GREEK MYTHOLOGY S The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology presents a comprehensive and integrated treatment of ancient Greek mythic tradition. Divided into three sections, the work consists of sixteen original articles authored by an ensemble of some of the world’s most distinguished scholars of classical mythology. Part I provides readers with an examination of the forms and uses of myth in Greek oral and written literature from the epic poetry of the eighth century BC to the mythographic catalogs of the early centuries AD. Part II looks at the relationship between myth, religion, art, and politics among the Greeks and at the Roman appropriation of Greek mythic tradition. The reception of Greek myth from the Middle Ages to modernity, in literature, feminist scholarship, and cinema, rounds out the work in Part III. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology is a unique resource that will be of interest and value not only to undergraduate and graduate students and professional scholars, but also to anyone interested in the myths of the ancient Greeks and their impact on western tradition. Roger D. Woodard is the Andrew V.V.Raymond Professor of the Clas- sics and Professor of Linguistics at the University of Buffalo (The State University of New York).He has taught in the United States and Europe and is the author of a number of books on myth and ancient civiliza- tion, most recently Indo-European Sacred Space: Vedic and Roman Cult. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms. Legrange's Lesson Plans
    Wilson County Schools Blended and Remote Learning ELA Week of 1/11/2021 Grade Subject 6th ELA Weekly Focus The students will continue to read two myths that focus on teaching lessons. Throughout this week, students will focus on using text evidence in their explanations, looking at how the author describes characters and their actions and write well developed paragraph(s) and an essay for given prompts. Standards 6.RL.KID.1: Analyze what a text says explicitly and draw logical inferences; cite textual evidence to support conclusions. 6.RL.KID.2: Determine the theme or central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text. 6.RL.KID.3: Describe how a plot of a story or drama unfolds, as well as how characters respond or change as the plot moves toward a resolution. 6..W.TTP.1 : Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence (introduce claim, support claim(s), organize reasons and evidence, effective conclusion). Achieve3000 Article of the Week “The Lessons of Peter Tabichi” https://portal.achieve3000.com/kb/lesson/?lid=18142&step=10&c=1&sc=276&oid=0&ot=0&asn=1 “Theseus and Minotaur” “Chiron, the Wisest Centaur” "Theseus and the Minotaur" "Chiron, the Wisest Centaur" Tasks Task 1 -- Read “Theseus and Minotaur” and answer the text-based questions Task 2 -- Complete the short writing prompt on “Theseus and Minotaur” Task 3 -- Read ”Chiron, the Wisest Centaur” and answer the text-based questions Task 4 -- Complete the short writing prompt on “Chiron, the Wisest Centaur” Task 5 -- Complete the writing prompt on “Theseus and Minotaur”, “Chiron, the Wisest Centaur”, and last week’s text in the synthesis writing section.
    [Show full text]
  • The Erotics of Imperialism: 5Th Century Literary Representations of Helen & Alcibiades
    The Erotics of Imperialism: 5th Century Literary Representations of Helen & Alcibiades Sarah Elizabeth Gonzalez Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in The Classical Studies Department under the advisement of Kate Gilhuly May 2020 © 2020 Sarah Elizabeth Gonzalez Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..5 Eros Unleashed Translation Note………………………………………………………………………………….10 Chapter 1…………………………………………………………………………………………11 The Literary History of Helen Chapter 2…………………………………………………………………………………………40 Imperialistic Intent and Genre Play in Euripides’ Helen Chapter 3…………………………………………………………………………………………80 Political Eroticism in Book 6 of The History of the Peloponnesian War Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………...121 Eros Interrupted Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………135 2 Acknowledgements This thesis was a labor of love -- and not the chaotic love I discuss in this thesis! While I was piloting this thesis ship, there were numerous crew mates behind the scenes helping me keep this project afloat. Without you, this ship would not have reached the harbor with as much ease or grace. First, to my thesis committee: Kate Gilhuly, Carol Dougherty and William Cain. To my thesis advisor and volunteer life coach, Kate Gilhuly: Thank you for taking on this project with me, and for having faith in the final product from the very beginning. Under your supervision, I have grown as both an academic and an adult. I cannot envision my time at Wellesley without your guidance and friendship. To my second reader, Carol Dougherty: Thank you for your helpful insight and encouragement throughout the composition of this thesis. As a result of your mentorship over the years, I have learned to think boldly and challenge myself to proudly vocalize my thoughts. If I had not enrolled in your Beginning Greek course my first year, this thesis might have been very different.
    [Show full text]
  • Sophocles' Philoctetes Roisman, Hanna M Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1997; 38, 2; Proquest Pg
    The appropriation of a son: Sophocles' Philoctetes Roisman, Hanna M Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1997; 38, 2; ProQuest pg. 127 The Appropriation of a Son: Sophocles' Philoctetes Hanna M. Roisman ANHOOD in archaic and classical Greece-as in modern times-is generally manifested not so much in relation­ M ships with women as in relationships with other men, especially in the relationship between father and son. The Greek male is expected to produce sons who will continue his oikos (e.g. Soph. Ant. 641-45; Eur. Ale. 62lf, 654-57). Further, as Hesiod makes clear, sons should resemble their fathers in both looks and conduct, especially the latter (Op. 182,235; ef Ii. 6.476-81; Theophr. Char. 5.5). Such resemblance earns the father public esteem and proves his manliness; the lack of it may be cause for disparagement and calls his manliness into question. 1 We learn from Ajax and Philoctetes that Sophocles follows the Hesiodic imperative that sons should resemble their fathers in their natures and their accomplishments. Ajax sees himself as an unworthy son, having lost Achilles' arms to Odysseus, and prefers to commit suicide rather than face his father, Telamon, who took part in Heracles' expedition to Troy and got Hesione, the best part of the booty, as a reward (Aj. 430-40,462-65, 470ff, 1300-303; Diod. 4.32.5). At the same time, he expects his son, Eurysaces, to be like himself in nature, valor, and in everything else ('ttl.~' aA.A.' OIlOlO~, Aj. 545-51). Sophocles' Philoctetes, on the other hand, presents the strug­ gle between Odysseus and Philoctetes for the 'paternity' of Neoptolemus, as each tries to mold the young man in his own 1 Even in contemporary Greece the intense male rivalry for proving oneself takes place among men alone, while women and flocks serve as the object of this rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • Dares Phrygius' De Excidio Trojae Historia: Philological Commentary and Translation
    Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Dares Phrygius' De Excidio Trojae Historia: Philological Commentary and Translation Jonathan Cornil Scriptie voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van Master in de Taal- en letterkunde (Latijn – Engels) 2011-2012 Promotor: Prof. Dr. W. Verbaal ii Table of Contents Table of Contents iii Foreword v Introduction vii Chapter I. De Excidio Trojae Historia: Philological and Historical Comments 1 A. Dares and His Historia: Shrouded in Mystery 2 1. Who Was ‘Dares the Phrygian’? 2 2. The Role of Cornelius Nepos 6 3. Time of Origin and Literary Environment 9 4. Analysing the Formal Characteristics 11 B. Dares as an Example of ‘Rewriting’ 15 1. Homeric Criticism and the Trojan Legacy in the Middle Ages 15 2. Dares’ Problematic Connection with Dictys Cretensis 20 3. Comments on the ‘Lost Greek Original’ 27 4. Conclusion 31 Chapter II. Translations 33 A. Translating Dares: Frustra Laborat, Qui Omnibus Placere Studet 34 1. Investigating DETH’s Style 34 2. My Own Translations: a Brief Comparison 39 3. A Concise Analysis of R.M. Frazer’s Translation 42 B. Translation I 50 C. Translation II 73 D. Notes 94 Bibliography 95 Appendix: the Latin DETH 99 iii iv Foreword About two years ago, I happened to be researching Cornelius Nepos’ biography of Miltiades as part of an assignment for a class devoted to the study of translating Greek and Latin texts. After heaping together everything I could find about him in the library, I came to the conclusion that I still needed more information. So I decided to embrace my identity as a loyal member of the ‘Internet generation’ and began my virtual journey through the World Wide Web in search of articles on Nepos.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Divine Intervention and Disguise in Homer's Iliad Senior Thesis
    Divine Intervention and Disguise in Homer’s Iliad Senior Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Undergraduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Undergraduate Program in Classical Studies Professor Joel Christensen, Advisor In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts By Joana Jankulla May 2018 Copyright by Joana Jankulla 1 Copyright by Joana Jankulla © 2018 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Joel Christensen. Thank you, Professor Christensen for guiding me through this process, expressing confidence in me, and being available whenever I had any questions or concerns. I would not have been able to complete this work without you. Secondly, I would like to thank Professor Ann Olga Koloski-Ostrow and Professor Cheryl Walker for reading my thesis and providing me with feedback. The Classics Department at Brandeis University has been an instrumental part of my growth in my four years as an undergraduate, and I am eternally thankful to all the professors and staff members in the department. Thank you to my friends, specifically Erica Theroux, Sarah Jousset, Anna Craven, Rachel Goldstein, Taylor McKinnon and Georgie Contreras for providing me with a lot of emotional support this year. I hope you all know how grateful I am for you as friends and how much I have appreciated your love this year. Thank you to my mom for FaceTiming me every time I was stressed about completing my thesis and encouraging me every step of the way. Finally, thank you to Ian Leeds for dropping everything and coming to me each time I needed it.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers Fighting Together in the Iliad
    BROTHERS FIGHTING TOGETHER IN THE ILIAD I We find in the Iliad numerous pairs of brothers (or half­ brothers on the father's side, or first cousins on the father's side) fighting together on foot or in the combination of chario­ teer-paraibates 1). And this is not confined to the men who are said to have taken part in the Trojan war, but it embraces the "mythical world of the past" 2), that of the demigods 3), the rivers 4) and even the gods 5). Moreover, if we turn to the leaders of the various groups of Greeks and Trojans, as given in book 11, we find that a 1). Such for example are: Ajax Telarnonius and Teucer (the Atav'ts, cf. p. 291), Mynes and Epistrophus (II 692f.), Phegeus and Idaeus (V 10f.), Echemon and Chromios (V 159 f.), Krethon and Orsilochus (V 542 f,), Aesepus and Pedasus (VI 21 f.), Hector and Alexander (VI 514 f., cf. VII 1 f.), Ascalaphus and lalmenus (IX 82f., cf. II 512), Peisandrus and Hip­ polochus (XI 122 f.), Hippodamus and Hypeirochus (XI 328 f.), Charops and Socus (XI 426 f.), the Molione (XI 750, 709 f.; XXIII 638 f.), Polybus, Agenor and Akarnas (XI 59 f.), Helenos and Deiphobus (XII 94 f,), Archelochus and Akamas (XIV 463 f.), Hector and Cebriones (XII 86 f.), Deiphobus and Polites (XIII 533 f.), Podarces and Iphiclus (XIII 693 f,), Deiphohus and Helenos (XIII 780 f.), Ascanius and Morys (XIII 792 f.), Atymnius and Maris (XVI 317 f.), Antilochus and Thrasymedes (XVI 322; XVII 377 f.; XVII 705), Euphorbus and Polydamas (XVII 1 f.), Chromius and Aretus (XVII 492 f.), Aretus and Hector (XVII 516), Polydorus and Hector (XX 407 f,), Laogonus and Dardanus (XX 460 f.), or Deiphobus and Hector (XXII 226 f.).
    [Show full text]
  • Helen of Troy
    T H E P O E T I C A L WO R K S A N D R E W L A N G I V OL . V TH E P O E T I CAL Wo rm s * W L A 3 ! d i b N E ted y M rs. L A G I N F 0UR VOLUM ES . VOL V . I With Port r ai n m (J r ee o L o g a l s n 63 L . P a te rn oste r R ow n E C . 39 , Lo don , . 4, N ew Y o rk Tor n to , o Bo m ba Ca c u t ta a nd M a a s y , l , d r $3“ k; on( 9 e! TH E PO ET I C AL WO R K S dited N G E by M r s . LA I N F OUR V OLUM ES V O L . I V 8 Ll O 3 \V ith P or tr a i ’ a tc rn ost r R w do n e o Lo n E C . , , . N ew Y r k T r n t o , o o o B m ba C a c u a a n d M a a s o y , l t t , d r fi %L eff M a d e i n! G r ea t TA BLE OF CON TE N TS V OLUM E I V XV H EL EN OF TR OY D edic a t io n : To a ll Old F ri e nd s The Com i ng ofP a ris Th e S p e ll ofAp h rodite Th e F light ofH e l e n Th e D e a th ofCo ry t h u s Th e \V a r Th e S a c k o fT ro T h e R u n o fH n y .
    [Show full text]
  • Treasury of Olympus
    IONIA Treasury of Olympus A Supplement for ZENOBIA by Günter D'Hoogh Written by Günter D'Hoogh © 2004 Additional material and assistance from Paul Elliott. Illustrations by Paul Elliott Acknowledgements It was a pleasure working on this project, being a history teacher it’s a fantastic feeling that it’s quite well possible to merge history and roleplaying together. I hope that the reader as much enjoys playing it as I enjoyed writing this little “Campaign Guide”. I especially want to thank Paul Elliott, the creator of the wonderful ZENOBIA. He has been my mentor, my great help and especially a very good friend who encouraged me when the spirit was low. Thanks Paul for letting me take part in your great adventure, for the editting work, for the maps and drawings, and for the fine articles you wrote in this book! I really hope we’ll see each other someday face-to-face my friend! Günter D’Hoogh 2 THE CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION II THE WORLD OF IONIA III CHARACTER CREATION IV GODS OF OLYMPUS V THE THESSALIAN WITCH VI MONSTERS & WILD ANIMALS VII PHILOSOPHY VIII TREASURES IX LABYRINTHS OF IONIA 3 I INTRODUCTION Ionia is a sleepy mountainous land steeped in history, a land of ancient cities that are home to philosophers, academics, poets and playwrights. Lost and forgotten beneath Ionia are the artefacts and treasures of the Olympian gods, harkening back to the Age of Heroes when Zeus, Ares and Athena walked the earth in disguise, when heroes like Achilles fought with magical invulnerability, when witches like Medea ruled secret enchanted islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Homer – the Iliad
    HOMER – THE ILIAD Homer is the author of both The Iliad and The Odyssey. He lived in Ionia – which is now modern day Turkey – between the years of 900-700 BC. Both of the above epics provided the framework for Greek education and thought. Homer was a blind bard, one who is a professional story teller, an oral historian. Epos or epic means story. An epic is a particular type of story; it involves one with a hero in the midst of a battle. The subject of the poem is the Trojan War which happened approximately in 1200 BC. This was 400 years before the poem was told by Homer. This story would have been read aloud by Homer and other bards that came after him. It was passed down generation to generation by memory. One can only imagine how valuable memory was during that time period – there were no hard drives or memory sticks. On a tangential note, one could see how this poem influenced a culture; to be educated was to memorize a particular set of poems or stories which could be cross-referenced with other people’s memory of those particular stories. The information would be public and not private. The Iliad is one of the greatest stories ever told – a war between two peoples; the Greeks from the West and the Trojans from the East. The purpose of this story is to praise Achilles. The two worlds are brought into focus; the world of the divine order and the human order. The hero of the story is to bring greater order and harmony between these two orders.
    [Show full text]