The Conservation of Madagascar's Orchids. a Model for an Integrated Conservation Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Orquídeas Christian Demetrio Associação Orquidófila Piracicabana ORQUIPIRA - 1998 Classificação
Orquídeas Christian Demetrio Associação Orquidófila Piracicabana ORQUIPIRA - 1998 Classificação: • Domínio: Eukariota • Reino: Plantae • Divisão: Magnoliophyta (Angiospermas) • Classe: Liliopsida (Monocotiledoneas) • Ordem: Asparagales • Família: Orchidaceae Família: Orchidaceae • Subfamílias: Apostasioidea Vanilloidea Cypripedioidea Orchidoidea Epidendroidea Distribuição: Gênero tipo – Lineu 1753 Orchis Espécie tipo: Orchis militaris Família Orchidaceae • 850 gêneros • 25.000 espécies • Mais de 100.000 híbridos registrados (RHS) Orchidaceae - Brasil Gêneros: 221 Espécies: 2491 Subespécies: 10 Variedades: 17 Orchidaceae in Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em: <http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB179>. Acesso em: 04 Abr. 2017 Caracterização da Família • Características gerais das monocotiledôneas • Estrutura floral: simetria bilateral Pétalas e sépalas semelhantes Labelo Coluna Polínia Ressupinação • Raízes com velame (epífitas) • Sementes diminutas X micorriza (Mycorrhyzum) Folhas: paralelinérvicas Sobralia spp Raízes fasciculadas Velame Estrutura Floral Sépala dorsal ou superior Pétalas Lóbulos laterais Sépalas laterais ou inferiores Lóbulo medial Estrutura Floral 1 – Sépala Dorsal; 2 – Pétalas; 3 – Sépalas Laterais; 4 – Lóbulo Frontal; 5 – Labelo; 6 – Ovário; 7 – Coluna; 8 – Estigma; 9 – Antena Coluna Políneas Antera Estigma Ressupinação Angraecum scottianum não ressupina Laelia purpurata ressupina Classificação pelo tipo de crescimento Simpodial Classificação pelo -
Ghosts of the Western Glades Just Northwest of Everglades National Park Lies Probably the Wildest, Least Disturbed Natural Area in All of Florida
Discovering the Ghosts of the Western Glades Just Northwest of Everglades National Park lies probably the wildest, least disturbed natural area in all of Florida. Referred to as the Western Everglades (or Western Glades), it includes Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve and Big Cypress National Preserve. Environmentalists that pushed for the creation of Everglades National Park originally wanted this area included in it. But politics and lack of funds prevented this. Several decades passed before Big Cypress National Preserve was born in 1974. Preserves have slightly less restrictive rules than national parks. So how is the Big Cypress Swamp distinct from the Everglades? Even though both habitats have many similarities (sawgrass prairies & tree islands, for instance), the Big Cypress Swamp is generally 1-2 feet higher in elevation. Also, it has a mainly southwesterly flow of water, dumping into the “ten thousand islands” area on Florida’s Gulf of Mexico coast and serving as an important watershed for the River of Grass to the south. Then, of course, there are the cypress trees. Cypress Trees Not surprisingly, of course, is the fact that the Big Cypress Swamp has about 1/3 of its area covered in cypress trees. Mostly they are the small “dwarf pond cypress” trees. (“Big” refers to the large mass of land not the size of the trees.) A few locations, however, still do boast the impressive towering “bald cypress” trees but most of those were logged out between the years 1913 - 1948. Ridge & Slough Topography Topography simply means the relief (or elevation variances) of any particular area of land. -
SOOS June 2021
Click to join from your computer, tablet SOUTHERN or smartphone: https://www.gotomeet.me/CathyDunn/ ONTARIO 2021-06 or Dial in using your phone: Canada: +1 ORCHID (647) 497-9373 Access Code: 226-011-165 SOCIETY NEWS June 2021, Volume 56, Issue 6 New to GoToMeeting? Get the app now and be Meeting since 1965 ready when your first meeting starts: https://global.gotomeeting.com/install/226011165 June 6Virtual Meeting: Please note that because this meeting is being produced via an internet program the participation capacity is limited to SOOS members only. Be sure to check that you have renewed your membership for Spencer Hauck, Sandhill Botanicals 2020. 2020 Memberships have been extended to the end of 2021. What’s bugging your Orchids? Virtual Show Table Our members are growing and th blooming amazing orchids and you are not shy about sharing Sunday, June 6 , 2021, 1:00 photographs of them. Our virtual show table has doubled in size in less than six months. We often receive over 100 PM (EDT) entries from over 25 different members!! Since we need time to organize the photos and to have them Followed by the judged, photos need to be received by the Wednesday before the Sunday meeting. SOOS Virtual Show Table Submitting photographs to SOOS constitutes permission for Entry Rules: SOOS to publish those images. No remuneration is offered or 1. Take photos between Sun. May 23rd implied. nd and Wed. June 2 . Send your best photos. Points will be given in the usual manner towards the ‘Orchid Grower of the Year’ program for 2. -
Phcogj.Com Diversity of Pteridophyta in Lubuak Mato Kuciang Padang
Pharmacogn J. 2020; 12(1):180-185 A Multifaceted Journal in the field of Natural Products and Pharmacognosy Research Article www.phcogj.com Diversity of Pteridophyta in Lubuak Mato Kuciang Padang Panjang, Sumatera Barat Skunda Diliarosta*, Rehani Ramadhani, Dewi Indriani ABSTRACT Padang Panjang city located at an altitude of 650 to 850 meters above sea level, so that weather cold and cool. Temperatures range from 17 °C to 26.1 °C and with 3,295 mm/ year of rainfall. This area is rich in the diversity of flora and fauna. Pteridophyta is one of the flora that has a unique diversity of species and has the potential for tremendous utilization such as kunda Diliarosta*, Rehani ornamental plants, medicines and vegetable plants. The study was conducted in the Lubuak Ramadhani, Dewi Indriani Mato Kuciang area of Padang Panjang City, West Sumatra, which is currently being developed for tourism. The aim of this study obtain collect data and information about the diversity of Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, ferns in Lubuk Mato Kuciang. The activities of the study are conducted to collect species as Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA. much as possible. Identification of fern species was carried out in the Laboratory of Educational Science. Mathematics and Science Faculty. Padang State University. The identification of flora Correspondence was analyzed descriptively. The identification species results were obtained through descriptive Skunda Diliarosta analysis. The results of this study obtains that there were 21 species of fern that include Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, 11 families. -
INVENTAIRE DES ORCHIDEES DE TALATAKELY PARC NATIONAL DE RANOMAFANA ETUDES MORPHOLOGIQUE ET MOLECULAIRE DE CINQ ESPECES DU GENRE Aerangis (Rchb.F.)
UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Mémoire pour l’obtention du Diplôme d’Etudes Approfondies (D.E.A.) En Biologie et Ecologie Végétales OPTION : ECOLOGIE VEGETALE INVENTAIRE DES ORCHIDEES DE TALATAKELY PARC NATIONAL DE RANOMAFANA ETUDES MORPHOLOGIQUE ET MOLECULAIRE DE CINQ ESPECES DU GENRE Aerangis (Rchb.f.) Présenté par RANDRIANINDRINA Veloarivony Rence Aimée (Maître ès Sciences) Soutenu publiquement le, 31 Janvier 2008 Devant la Commission de jury composée de : Président : Pr. RAJERIARISON Charlotte Examinateurs : Dr. RABAKONANDRIANINA Elisabeth Dr. FALINIAINA Lucien Rapporteurs : Dr. RAKOUTH Bakolimalala Dr. EDWARD Louis Jr. 1 UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Mémoire pour l’obtention du Diplôme d’Etudes Approfondies (D.E.A.) En Biologie et Ecologie Végétales OPTION : ECOLOGIE VEGETALE INVENTAIRE DES ORCHIDEES DE TALATAKELY PARC NATIONAL DE RANOMAFANA ETUDES MORPHOLOGIQUE ET MOLECULAIRE DE CINQ ESPECES DU GENRE Aerangis (Rchb.f.) Présenté par RANDRIANINDRINA Veloarivony Rence Aimée (Maître ès Sciences) Soutenu publiquement le, 31 Janvier 2008 Devant la Commission de jury composée de : Président : Pr. Charlotte RAJERIARISON Examinateurs : Dr. Elisabeth RABAKONANDRIANINA Dr Lucien. FALINIAINA Rapporteurs : Dr. Bakolimalala RAKOUTH Dr. Louis Jr. EDWARD 2 REMERCIEMENTS En premier lieu, nous voudrions rendre gloire à Dieu pour sa bienveillance et sa bénédiction. Mené à terme ce mémoire, est le fruit de la collaboration entre -
Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification
--------- -- ---------· 4 CHAPTER 1 REVIEW OF SELECTED LITERATURE AND EPIPHYTE CLASSIFICATION 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Literature (p. 5) Several important aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology that are not investigated as part of this work, are reviewed, particularly those published on more. recently. 1.2 Epiphyte Classification and Terminology (p.11) is reviewed and the system used here is outlined and defined. A glossary of terms, as used here, is given. 5 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Li.terature Since the main works of Schimper were published (1884, 1888, 1898), particularly Die Epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas (1888), many workers have written on many aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology. Most of these will not be reviewed here because they are not directly relevant to the present study or have been effectively reviewed by others. A few papers that are keys to the earlier literature will be mentioned but most of the review will deal with topics that have not been reviewed separately within the chapters of this project where relevant (i.e. epiphyte classification and terminology, aspects of epiphyte synecology and CAM in the epiphyt~s). Reviewed here are some special problems of epiphytes, particularly water and mineral availability, uptake and cycling, general nutritional strategies and matters related to these. Also, all Australian works of any substance on vascular epiphytes are briefly discussed. some key earlier papers include that of Pessin (1925), an autecology of an epiphytic fern, which investigated a number of factors specifically related to epiphytism; he also reviewed more than 20 papers written from the early 1880 1 s onwards. -
Part I Chinese Plant Names Index 2010-2017
This Book is Sponsored by Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden 上海辰山植物园 Shanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences 中国科学院上海辰山植物科学研究中心 Special Fund for Scientific Research of Shanghai Landscaping & City Appearance Administrative Bureau (G182415) 上海市绿化和市容管理局科研专项 (G182415) National Specimen Information Infrastructure, 2018 Special Funds 中国国家标本平台 2018 年度专项 Shanghai Sailing Program (14YF1413800) 上海市青年科技英才扬帆计划 (14YF1413800) Chinese Plant Names Index 2010-2017 DU Cheng & MA Jin-shuang Chinese Plant Names Index 2010-2017 中国植物名称索引 2010-2017 DU Cheng & MA Jin-shuang Abstract The first two volumes of Chinese Plant Names Index (CPNI) cover the years 2000 through 2009, with entries 1 through 5,516, and 2010 through 2017, with entries 5,517 through 10,795. A unique entry is generated for the specific name of each taxon in a specific publication. Taxonomic treatments cover all novelties at the rank of family, genus, species, subspecies, variety, form and named hybrid taxa, new name changes (new combinations and new names), new records, new synonyms and new typifications for vascular plants reported or recorded from China. Detailed information on the place of publication, including author, publication name, year of publication, volume, issue, and page number, are given in detail. Type specimens and collects information for the taxa and their distribution in China, as well as worldwide, are also provided. The bibliographies were compiled from 182 journals and 138 monographs or books published worldwide. In addition, more than 400 herbaria preserve type specimens of Chinese plants are also listed as an appendix. This book can be used as a basic material for Chinese vascular plant taxonomy, and as a reference for researchers in biodiversity research, environmental protection, forestry and medicinal botany. -
January 2011
An Affiliate of the American Orchid Society FORT LAUDERDALE ORCHID SOCIETY January 20lL Fred Clarke To Speak Jan. 10th Our Best Time, Show Time This artwork is to set the tone for beautiful and Our January meeting always kicks off show week and special which describes our show and one of the for that reason alone it is both busy and exciting. TIlis world's most famous orchids to be described here later. year we have a very exciting night planned. Fred Now some show thoughts. Our show is probably Clarke is famous for his ("a/ose/1I1Il intergencric the second largest display show in the United States. hybrids which produced, afier 10 years of work, the It costs about S50,000 to put on. One of the many blackest flowers every witnessed. That plant was of happy things about the show is the tim of working course Fredclarkeara After Dark wh ich has been together, and we do work. It takes 163 fo ur hour shill:; awarded eight FCCs. Fred has recently added New to make the show what it is while it is open. [t takes Guiana DendrobiulIIs to his ' normal' interest range of mega other hours for pre-show activities. This Co/ase/ums. Cyc floches, Mormodes and hybridizing newsletter is going out early to remind you to COllleyas. Bulbop/iylulIIs and PaphiopedilulIls. volunteer for one or more show sbifts. The greatest Fred's business is Sunset Orchids in Vista, needs are for the I :20-4:40, and the 4:40-8:00 PM Ca lifornia. -
JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (1999) Plant Systematics
CHAPTER8 Phylogenetic Relationships of Angiosperms he angiosperms (or flowering plants) are the dominant group of land Tplants. The monophyly of this group is strongly supported, as dis- cussed in the previous chapter, and these plants are possibly sister (among extant seed plants) to the gnetopsids (Chase et al. 1993; Crane 1985; Donoghue and Doyle 1989; Doyle 1996; Doyle et al. 1994). The angio- sperms have a long fossil record, going back to the upper Jurassic and increasing in abundance as one moves through the Cretaceous (Beck 1973; Sun et al. 1998). The group probably originated during the Jurassic, more than 140 million years ago. Cladistic analyses based on morphology, rRNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences do not support the traditional division of angiosperms into monocots (plants with a single cotyledon, radicle aborting early in growth with the root system adventitious, stems with scattered vascular bundles and usually lacking secondary growth, leaves with parallel venation, flow- ers 3-merous, and pollen grains usually monosulcate) and dicots (plants with two cotyledons, radicle not aborting and giving rise to mature root system, stems with vascular bundles in a ring and often showing sec- ondary growth, leaves with a network of veins forming a pinnate to palmate pattern, flowers 4- or 5-merous, and pollen grains predominantly tricolpate or modifications thereof) (Chase et al. 1993; Doyle 1996; Doyle et al. 1994; Donoghue and Doyle 1989). In all published cladistic analyses the “dicots” form a paraphyletic complex, and features such as two cotyle- dons, a persistent radicle, stems with vascular bundles in a ring, secondary growth, and leaves with net venation are plesiomorphic within angio- sperms; that is, these features evolved earlier in the phylogenetic history of tracheophytes. -
Epilist 1.0: a Global Checklist of Vascular Epiphytes
Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 EpiList 1.0: a global checklist of vascular epiphytes Zotz, Gerhard ; Weigelt, Patrick ; Kessler, Michael ; Kreft, Holger ; Taylor, Amanda Abstract: Epiphytes make up roughly 10% of all vascular plant species globally and play important functional roles, especially in tropical forests. However, to date, there is no comprehensive list of vas- cular epiphyte species. Here, we present EpiList 1.0, the first global list of vascular epiphytes based on standardized definitions and taxonomy. We include obligate epiphytes, facultative epiphytes, and hemiepiphytes, as the latter share the vulnerable epiphytic stage as juveniles. Based on 978 references, the checklist includes >31,000 species of 79 plant families. Species names were standardized against World Flora Online for seed plants and against the World Ferns database for lycophytes and ferns. In cases of species missing from these databases, we used other databases (mostly World Checklist of Selected Plant Families). For all species, author names and IDs for World Flora Online entries are provided to facilitate the alignment with other plant databases, and to avoid ambiguities. EpiList 1.0 will be a rich source for synthetic studies in ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology as it offers, for the first time, a species‐level overview over all currently known vascular epiphytes. At the same time, the list represents work in progress: species descriptions of epiphytic taxa are ongoing and published life form information in floristic inventories and trait and distribution databases is often incomplete and sometimes evenwrong. -
J.F. Veldkamp (Continued from Page 104)
BIBLIOGRAPHY: BRYOPHYTES 165 XVI. Bibliography J.F. Veldkamp (continued from page 104) * Books have been marked with an asterisk. BRYOPHYTES AKIYAMA, H. 1988. Studies onLeucodon (Leucodontaceae, Musci)and related genera in East Asia III. Notes on the systematic position of Pterogonium. Acta Phytotax. Geo- bot. 39: 73-82, 4 fig. — To Isobryales near Anomodon. ASAKAWA, Y. 1988. Chemicalevolution of mono- and sesquiterpenoids ofliverworts. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 64: 97-108, 16 fig. BISCHLER, H. 1989. MarchantiaL.: subg. Chlamidium (Nees) Bischl. sect. Papillatae Bischl. sect. nov. en Asie et en Ocianie. Cryptog., Bryol. Lichenol. 10: 61-79, 9 fig, 3 tab. (In French, Engl. summ.). — Marchantia emarginata group, 2 species, 5 sub- species. - — 1988. Marchantiapaleacea Bertol. Karyotype analysis. Beih. Nova Hedw. 90 (1988) 95-100, 2 fig, 1 tab. — 1988. Relationships in the order Marchantiales (Hepaticae). J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 64: 47-57, 3 tab. BUCK, W.R. 1988. Another view ofthe familial delimitationofthe Hookeriales. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 64: 29-36,1 fig. — 5 families; key; descriptions. CAP, T. & C. GAO. 1988. Studies ofChinese bryophytes. (2). Trematodon Michx. (Mus- ci, Dicranaceae). J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 65: 323-334, 6 fig, 1 tab. — 2 species, 1 Male- sian; descriptions. CATCHESIDE, D.G. 1988. The mosses of the Northern territory, Australia. J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 11: 1-17, 4 — 95 54 new records, fig. species, keys to some genera. CHANDRA, V., et al. 1987. Calobryales: Distribution andphytogeographical discussion. Geophytology 17: 227-232, 1 map. * EDDY, A. 1988. A handbook ofMalesian mosses. 1. Sphagnales to Dicranales. iii, 204 165 British London. ISBN 0-567-01038-7. -
Chromosome Numbers and Cross-Compatibility in the Genus Cymbidium and Some Related Tropical Genera (Orchidaceae)
CHROMOSOME NUMBERS AND CROSS-COMPATIBILITY IN THE GENUS CYMBIDIUM AND SOME RELATED TROPICAL GENERA (ORCHIDACEAE) A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HORTICULTURE AUGUST 1977 By Kenneth W. Leonhardt Dissertation Committee: Yoneo Sagawa, Chairman Haruyuki Kamemoto Henry Y. Nakasone Philip E. Parvin William L. Theobald We certify that we have read this dissertation and that in our opinion it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Horticulture. DISSERTATION COMMITTEE (7 'Cry^o , w A Chairman Chromosome Numbers and Cross-Compatibility in the Genus Cymbidium and Some Related Tropical Genera (Orchidaceae) Abstract Investigations on chromosome numbers and cross-compatibility were made with species and hybrids of Cymbidium and other tropical genera of the family Orchidaceae. Chromosome number determinations were made of 163 plants. One hundred nineteen counts of Cymbidium clones were made of which 92 are reported for the first time. Diploid, triploid, tetraploid, hexaploid and aneuploid individuals were determined. Triploid cultivars of two species, C. insigne 'Bierii' and C. pumilum 'Yashima' were found. Forty- four counts of intergeneric hybrids and genera other than Cymbidium were made. The hybrid status of 17 progenies of intergeneric pollinations was determined by analysis of somatic chromosome numbers. Nine plants derived from colchicine treated protocorms were identified as polyploids; 8 being euploid and 1 a mixoploid. The origin of the polyploid nature of some of the hybrids not subjected to colchicine treatments is dis cussed. It was verified cytologically that Cymbidium did hybridize with Ansellia and Catasetum.