Friedrich Gentz, an Opponent of the French Revolution and Napoleon
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FRIEDRICH GENTZ, AN OPPONENT OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION AND NAPOLEON BY PAUL FRIEDRICH REIFF Ph.D. University of Basel, 1901 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HISTORY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 19 1 2 - ftiz R27 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE GRADUATE SCHOOL \9p7, I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY ENTITLED ^J^W^MX/C, ^ImZ^ ; OiAA &^U~-[AJy^ ^ ^MlXsL BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF L * /In Charge of Major Work Head of Department Recommendation concurred in: &L*j/L*i*f : \ Committee jZLi %^L^%^^Ls^ > on ^T^-ok-cL. ) Final Examination /$t>yj^. fk?^ — 2 1 8-?9fi UIUC Contents . Introduction 1. Chapter: The Causes of the Struggle 1. Environments of the young Gentz..... 2. Gentz';? character 3. Ge^tz's political theories 2. Chapter: The Struggle against the Revolution 1. Before the Struggle: 1789- 1703 2. 1793-1001 , 3. Chapter: The Struggle against Napoleon 1. Before the Struggle: 1798-1802. 2. 1803-1809. , . , 3. 1813-1815 Conclusion Abbreviations , "Aug dem 'lachlasse" ......... "Aug dem Nachlasse Friedrichs von Gentz", 2 vol., 1867-1868. "Briefe v. u, a. Fr, v. von Gentz" . "Briefe von und an Friedrich Gentz", ed. by F. C. Wittichen, 2 vol. , 1909- 1910, "Briefw. zw. Fr. Gentz u. A. H. Mueller" "Briefwechsel swischen Friedrich Gentz und Adam Heinrich Mueller", 1857, «H, J.'.' "Historisches Journal", ed. by Friedrich Gentz, 6 vol., 17S9 -1800, inedits du "Mem. et lett . ined, ...... "Memoirs et lettres Chevalier de Gentz", ed. by Schlesier, 1841. "Oestreichs Teilnahmei! "Oestreichs Teilnahme an den Be- freiungskriegen" , ed. by Prince Metternich and C. von Klinkow- stroem, 1887. Schiesier "Bchriften von Friedrich von Gentz ed. by Schlesier, 5 vol., 1838 -1840. Weick "Auserwaehlte Bchriften von Frie- drich von Gentz", ed. by Weick, 5 vol., 1836-1838. Harrow personalities are easy to understand and to classify; rich personalities, on the other hand, seem to defy definition That at least is one of the teachings which nay be derived from a study of the career and character of the publicist, Frederick Gentz. Gentz 's life was not an unusually long one. yet it was un- usually rich in activities and complex tendencies. But the causes of this lay less in the tremendous vibrations of th^ era in which aentz lived than in the man himself. They lay in a versatility of mind which was truly astonishing. An official in the Prussian and Austrian civil services, a diplomatic agent of England on the con- tinent, the self-arm ointed advisor of ministers and rulers, one of the busiest and ablest writers of his time, the arch-enemy of the first French revolution and the first Napoleon, the secretary of Europe during nine highly important months, one of the pillars of the Reaction, a social genius of the first order, the bohe'mien par excellence and a romanticist as well as a rationalist — all this Gentz was. His youth fell in the era of enlightenment and of Frederick the Great, his manhood coincided with the first French revolution and with Uapoleon, and his later life belonged to the age of Metternich. The question who Gentz was would thus seem to be difficult to answer. However, if we consider only his political activity and the intellectual traits of his nature, leaving aside its . sentimental and social features, the answer will be easier. We will then have the choice between two main concept ions of the man. one of these would he to see in Gentz an eighteenth century type in general, and a practical exponent of the rationalistic doctrine of government in particular. This conception is in one way undoubtedly the deepest and truest, for Gentz was indeed rooted in the doctrines of rat ionalism , at least as regards his pol- itical activity. It has. however, one serious drawback, the fact that in its light the life-work of Gentz—his struggles against the Revolution, against Napoleon and for the Reaction — appears as nothing but a mere appendix to his theories; and that, of course would be a rather abstract way of looking at him. We havo thus to turn to the other conception which puts actions first and theories second, viewed from its angle. Gentz would be seen chiefly as a participant —more or less a negative one, it is true — in the great European movements between the first and second French, revolution. And thus, it seems, Gentz must indeed be viewed. He was essentially a theorist whom the course of events aroused, but in fact a man of action. He started out with highly idealistic principles, those of human brotherliness and human progress, of liberty, equality justice and peace. Part of these he retained and championed for many years; other, he soon dropped or at least modified, taking up in their stead as a new principle, the defense of that system which was threatened with overthrow by the events of 173P and the following- decades. The French Revolution. Bonapartism and Liberalism alike Were hateful to him; they all meant democrac:.r or at least a drifting towards it, and democracy he abhorred. But his special foe, his nightmare for more than ten years was Napoleon. Through him he suf- fered many a bad hour and — gained immortality; for such is the mean- . , ing of true greatness that mere opposition to it brings fame. He helped to arouse and to organize the opposition against whatever was revolutionary and agressive; hut nowhere was he more fervent than in his crusade against this hated man and gigantic child of the Re- volution. His whole life, indeed, centres about these ten years of anti-Napoleonic activity. The following study will, in general, he in accordance with the second of the two conceptions, it aims, in the first place, at a careful representation of Gentz's struggle against the first Napol- eon. Its seconi object —historically the first — is an account of Gentz's relations to the first French revolution. The introductory chapter will try to give the causes of Gentz's attitude in both cases Gentz was horn in 1764 at Breslau, the capital of the Prus- sian province of Silesia, and died in 1832 at Vienna. His father held until 1779 a position in tfc royal mint at Breslau and then became director of the mint at Berlin; through his mother he was related with the later Prussian minister of state, Anoillon. He received his first education in the public schools of his native city and in the Joachimathal Gymnasium at Berlin; from 1783 until 1785 he at- tended the university at Koerigsberg where Kant was still teaching. Entering the Prussian civil service in 1785 he worked during the following years in various central boards of the monarchy. In 18C2 he ^as taken over into the Austrian civil service. His official position there was at first, a very vague one: he was attached to the ministry of foreign affairs, the "StaatsXanzlei n but had little to do and nothing to say. After about 1811, however, he became the right hand man of Metternich and was as such, of course, important and influential. I. THE CAUSES OF THE STRUGGLE 1. Environments of the young Gentz. Although Gentz was not a Berliner by birth, yet he lived long enough in the Prussian capital to be counted as one. The first milieu of his youth was then the Berlin of about the years 1780-1790. Beyond it lay, as larger circles, the conditions of Prussia and of the Empire. Beyond these again extended the at- mosphere of European life and thought in general. Berlin was at the time of the death of Frederick the Great a city of about a hundred and fifty thousand people, the strong garrison included. A modest-sized place then, one might say, if everything had not been smaller in those days. Scenic charms it never possessed, although the near-by Havel lakes are not without their quiet, melancholy attractions. Its streets were none too clean, rather badly lighted and unsafe at night. There were perhaps a few noteworthy buildings here and there, but the general level of architecture was rather low. The present university had not yet been founded; the academies of sciences and of arts, however, already existed. The intellectual and artistic life of the city could lay no claim to special distinction. No famous philosopher or schol- ar, no great poet or artist lived within its precincts; there were, of course, Nicolai and Mendelssohn, but they could not be called great, and Lessing had long since left the city. The city was too young for that, too sober, too "busy and too poor to be a centre of learning and art; it possessed many soldiers, plenty of sand, an invigorating climate and a great king, but no Hes- perian gard*ns and no zephirs. few books and hardly any history to speak of. Nevertheless, in a certain sense the city could even then boast of intellectual preeminence: it was the center of German rationalism and already endowed with that critical mind for which it has ever since been famous. Socially the nobility predominated; the other classes —the officials and the profes- sions, the wealthier merchants, the descendents of the French emigres and the Jews — still counted for little. The moral stan- dard was unsatisfactory in many regards, but probably not as bad as anti-rationalists would have it; it had already been on the decline in the later years of Frederick the Great , and under his successor matters went from bad to worse.