DOCSLIB.ORG

The Coming of the French Revolution 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Coming of the French Revolution 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook THE COMING OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Georges Lefebvre | 9780691168463 | | | | | The Coming of the French Revolution 1st edition PDF Book A new governmental structure was created for Paris known as the Commune , headed by Jean-Sylvain Bailly , former president of the Assembly. The King and many Feuillants with him expected war would increase his personal popularity; he also foresaw an opportunity to exploit any defeat: either result would make him stronger. If your only way of connecting to the French Revolution in the past has been Les Miserables, this book is it. On 17 July, Louis visited Paris accompanied by deputies, where he was met by Bailly and accepted a tricolore cockade to loud cheers. By declaring war, the Convention hoped to mobilise revolutionary fervour and blame rising prices, shortages and unemployment as arising from external threats. It is therefore more difficult to live as a free man than to live as a slave, and that is why men so often renounce their freedom; for freedom is in its way an invitation to a life of courage, and sometimes "Liberty is by no means an invitation to indifference or to irresponsible power; nor is it the promise of unlimited well-being without a counterpart of toil and effort. Genoa the city became a republic while its hinterland became the Ligurian Republic. Created by WorkBot. Highly recommended. Retrieved 3 January Although persuaded to disperse, on 2 June the Convention was surrounded by a crowd of up to 80,, demanding cheap bread, unemployment pay and political reforms, including restriction of the vote to the sans-culottes , and the right to remove deputies at will. A History of Modern Britain: to the Present. Readers also enjoyed. Last edited by ImportBot. First published in , on the eve of the Second World War, and suppressed by the Vichy government, this classic work explains what happened in France in , the first year of the French Revolution. In Paris, various committees, the mayor, the assembly of representatives, and the individual districts each claimed authority independent of the others. Palmer and featuring an introduction by Timothy Tackett that provides a concise intellectual biography of Lefebvre and a critical appraisal of the book, this Princeton Classics edition continues to offer fresh insights into democracy, dictatorship, and insurrection. Georges Lefebvre was a French historian, best known for his work on the French Revolution and peasant life. Betros, Gemma They pushed the allies to the east bank of the Rhine, allowing France, by the beginning of , to conquer the Dutch Republic itself. They also demanded vigorous price controls to keep bread — the major food of the poor people — from becoming too expensive. It took different forms, such as the English ' coffeehouse culture ', and extended to areas colonised by Europeans, particularly British North America. However, it failed to consolidate the gains of the Revolution, which continued with increasing momentum and escalating radicalism until Hampson, Norman Classifications Dewey Decimal Class Lefebvre sets forth clearly the many causes of that insurrection and explains the influences exerted by the various classes and factions—the nobles and the clergy, on the one side, and the bourgeoisie and the peasantry on the other. Luis Firmin de Carvajal Antonio Ricardos. Robespierre responded by not attending sessions, allowing his opponents to build a coalition against him. Rabine p. Public unrest at high prices, political stalemate and military defeat resulted in the Insurrection of 10 August , abolition of the monarchy and establishment of the First French Republic on 22 September The government imposed price controls and persecuted speculators and traders in the black market. She focused on other aspects of the government, but was a feminist by virtue of the fact that she was a woman working to influence the world. However, the progression of events is easy to follow. Main article: French period. Food shortages arising from a poor harvest were exacerbated in Northern France by the need to supply the army in Flanders , while the harsh winter made it difficult to transport goods around the country. Seller Inventory WP Georges Lefebvre. Faced with their opposition, Calonne summoned the Assembly of Notables , an advisory council dominated by the upper nobility, who ruled only the Estates-General could approve such changes. The William and Mary Quarterly. Qwestbooks Philadelphia, PA, U. Repetition had staled even this most grisly of entertainments, and audiences grew bored. The coming of the French Revolution , Vintage. Interpreting the French Revolution. The Coming of the French Revolution 1st edition Writer By 27 June, they had been joined by the majority of the clergy, plus forty-seven members of the nobility, and Louis backed down; messages of support for the Assembly poured in from Paris and other cities. To borrow from MJ Cherry. Although the situation remained tense, order was eventually restored, and the Royal family and Assembly left for Paris, escorted by the National Guard. Origins of the French Revolution 3rd ed. Blue and red are the traditional colours of Paris, and they are used on the city's coat of arms. Faced with their opposition, Calonne summoned the Assembly of Notables , an advisory council dominated by the upper nobility, who ruled only the Estates-General could approve such changes. Views Read View source View history. France permanently became a society of equals under the law. Women forced their way into the political sphere. Buy this book Better World Books. The Terror in the French Revolution. Nov 08, Katy added it. Georges Lefebvre — was one of the most important twentieth-century historians of the French Revolution. The Days of the French Revolution. More important was difference in intent; Jefferson saw the US Constitution and Bill of Rights as fixing the political system at a specific point in time, claiming they 'contained no original thought This really is an excellent introduction to the reasons for the French Revolut Two revolutions in two different countries. The Jacobin cause was picked up by Marxists in the midth century and became an element of communist thought around the world. Weir, David New Book. The King would have the unique power to propose war, with the legislature then deciding whether to declare war. The American Journal of Comparative Law. Critical Review. Indiana UP. Jefferson became president in , but was hostile to Napoleon as a dictator and emperor. Doyle, William Comninel Blanning, T. Louis XVI was increasingly dismayed by the direction of the revolution. The classic Marxist interpretation of the French Revolution's origins. Right-wing elements now argued for a new election, but Mirabeau prevailed, asserting that the status of the assembly had fundamentally changed, and that no new election should take place before completing the constitution. The French Revolution, a Political History, — 4 vol. The Coming of the French Revolution 1st edition Reviews Journal of Interdisciplinary History. All these new countries were satellites of France and had to pay large subsidies to Paris, as well as provide military support for Napoleon's wars. Schama, Simon He set up a series of new republics, complete with new codes of law and abolition of old feudal privileges. Above all the antagonism helped stimulate and shape German nationalism. First, the nobility, through the Assembly of Notables, challenged the authority of the king, before the "bourgeois" revolution of the Third Estate was followed by, and gave fuel to, uprisings by the "workers" and, finally, the "peasants", with each section of society having collective interests that drove their actions. First published in Censer, Jack; Hunt, Lynn However, the progression of events is easy to follow. Want more? Bourbon kings. The coming of the French Revolution. They pushed the allies to the east bank of the Rhine, allowing France, by the beginning of , to conquer the Dutch Republic itself. Press in English. Feb 25, Trevor rated it it was amazing. The voters had only a limited choice because the electoral rules required two-thirds of the seats go to members of the old Convention, no matter how few popular votes they received. Geoffrey Symcox. Indiana UP. The Brunswick Manifesto issued by the Allies in July threatened retaliation against those who opposed their advance or reinstatement of the monarchy. There is no evidence of a negative effect of French invasion. Written in English — pages. Princeton University Press. France topics. The Revolution caused a massive shift of power from the Catholic Church to the state; although the extent of religious belief has been questioned, elimination of tolerance for religious minorities meant by being French also meant being Catholic. Liberal Wars Second French Empire. Belgium now had a government bureaucracy selected by merit. Almost immediately, French forces suffered defeats on many fronts, and were driven out of their newly conquered territories in the spring of The brutal repression that followed has been debated by French historians since the midth century, with some calling it a genocide. The Coming of the French Revolution 1st edition Read Online Early Middle Ages. Readers also enjoyed. Thus, reading very simply like a play in four acts the revolution by the aristocrats, the revolution by the bourgeoisie, the revolution by the people, the revolution by the peasants 'The Coming of the French Revolution' may still oversimplifies things in its overall Marxist approach but, nevertheless, it makes for an accessible and clear snapshots of events otherwise highly complex and controversial. Although committed to Republicanism, the Directory distrusted democracy. His successor was the Swiss Protestant Necker, who was replaced in by Calonne. As internal and external threats to the Republic increased, the position worsened; dealing with this by printing paper money or assignats devalued the currency and those most impacted were the urban poor, or sans-culottes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2014 Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789 Kiley Bickford University of Maine - Main Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Cultural History Commons Recommended Citation Bickford, Kiley, "Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789" (2014). Honors College. 147. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/147 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIONALISM IN THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 by Kiley Bickford A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a Degree with Honors (History) The Honors College University of Maine May 2014 Advisory Committee: Richard Blanke, Professor of History Alexander Grab, Adelaide & Alan Bird Professor of History Angela Haas, Visiting Assistant Professor of History Raymond Pelletier, Associate Professor of French, Emeritus Chris Mares, Director of the Intensive English Institute, Honors College Copyright 2014 by Kiley Bickford All rights reserved. Abstract The French Revolution of 1789 was instrumental in the emergence and growth of modern nationalism, the idea that a state should represent, and serve the interests of, a people, or "nation," that shares a common culture and history and feels as one. But national ideas, often with their source in the otherwise cosmopolitan world of the Enlightenment, were also an important cause of the Revolution itself. The rhetoric and documents of the Revolution demonstrate the importance of national ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treaty of Lunéville J. David Markham When Napoleon Became
    The Treaty of Lunéville J. David Markham When Napoleon became First Consul in 1799, his first order of business was to defend France against the so-called Second Coalition. This coalition was made up of a number of smaller countries led by Austria, Russia and Britain. The Austrians had armies in Germany and in Piedmont, Italy. Napoleon sent General Jean Moreau to Germany while he, Napoleon, marched through Switzerland to Milan and then further south, toward Alessandria. As Napoleon, as First Consul, was not technically able to lead an army, the French were technically under the command of General Louis Alexandre Berthier. There, on 14 June 1800, the French defeated the Austrian army led by General Michael von Melas. This victory, coupled with Moreau’s success in Germany, lead to a general peace negotiation resulting in the Treaty of Lunéville (named after the town in France where the treaty was signed by Count Ludwig von Cobenzl for Austria and Joseph Bonaparte for Austria. The treaty secured France’s borders on the left bank of the Rhine River and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. France ceded territory and fortresses on the right bank, and various republics were guaranteed their independence. This translation is taken from the website of the Fondation Napoléon and can be found at the following URL: https://www.napoleon.org/en/history-of-the- two-empires/articles/treaty-of-luneville/. I am deeply grateful for the permission granted to use it by Dr. Peter Hicks of the Fondation. That French organization does an outstanding job of promoting Napoleonic history throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques-Louis David's 'Oath of the Tennis Court'
    EXTENSION ACTIVITIES – Jacques-Louis David’s ‘Oath of the Tennis Court’, 1791 Read the discussion of Jacques-Louis-David’s ‘Oath of the Tennis Court’ (1791) on p. 3-8 of this handout. Then complete the following extension activities: 1. One of the big problems which faced David as the Revolution progressed was that many of the figures to whom he had given prominence in the 1791 drawing fell from favour as political conditions changed. Using Liberating France (including the Who’s Who) and other sources, find out what happened to Mounier, Mirabeau, Bailly, Barère, Barnave, and Robespierre. Then research the clergymen, Abbé Grégoire and Abbé Sieyès. 2. David alludes to the popular movement which became known as the sans-culottes through the strong and robust figure in the red bonnet of liberty in the lower left hand corner. Referring to Liberating France (including the Section B Timeline), write a paragraph to outline the role played by the sans-culottes movement from 10 August 1792 until the days of Germinal and Prairial Year III, (1 April and 20-23 May 1795). 3. Using Liberating France (including the Who’s Who) and other sources, outline David’s revolutionary career – both as a painter and as a politician. In your answer consider the importance his paintings and drawings 1789-1795, and his role in organising public ceremonies. Then investigate his political activities as a deputy in the National Convention. 4. David uses at least eight revolutionary ideas in his 1791 study of the Tennis Court Oath. Locate them and any other revolutionary ideas not mentioned in the summary above.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNALS Maqueta Nova
    DOSSIER EPISODIS DE LA HISTÒRIA DE FIGUERES La Guerra Gran i el castell de Sant Ferran (1793-1795) Per Marià Baig i Aleu (*) Resum Abstract Després de repassar breument la història de la We review the history of the construction of construcció, al segle XVIII , del castell de Sant the castle of Sant-Ferran, near Figueres, that Ferran de Figueres –una de les principals is one of the most important European’s fortaleses baluardades d’Europa–, i d’analitzar bastioned fortresses. We also summarize the les causes de la Guerra Gran (1793-1795) entre origins of the “Guerra Gran”, the war la monarquia espanyola i la República between the Spanish’s monarchy and the Francesa, es presenten els principals esdeve- revolutionary France. We present, finally, the niments que portaren a la “inexplicable” main facts and speculations about the rendició del castell de Sant Ferran enfront les “incredible” capitulation of the castle of tropes franceses el dia 27 de novembre de 1794, Sant-Ferran to the French troops the així com les especulacions que s’originaren a November, 27 th of 1794. conseqüència d’aquest fet. Paraules clau Keywords Guerra Gran, Guerres de la Convenció, Convention wars, Sant-Ferran castle of castell de Sant Ferran de Figueres, Revolu- Figueres, French Revolution ció Francesa Recepció: 14/08/2014 • Acceptació: 10/10/2014. * Centre d’Història de la Ciència (CEHIC). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. DOI: 10.2436/20.8010.01.147 Annals de l’Institut d’Estudis Empordanesos, volum 45 (2014) Marià Baig i Aleu 45 INTRODUCCIÓ El castell de Sant Ferran de Figueres –una de les fortaleses baluardades més gran i més ben conservades d’Europa– ha sigut una obra que ha generat polèmica des del mateix moment en què es va prendre la decisió d’ubicar-lo sobre el turó dels caputxins de Figueres, a principis del segle XVIII .
    [Show full text]
  • The Gattilusj of Lesbos (1355—1462). «Me Clara Caesar Donat Leebo Ac Mytilene, Caesar, Qui Graio Praesidet Iraperio'
    The Gattilusj of Lesbos (1355—1462). «Me clara Caesar donat Leebo ac Mytilene, Caesar, qui Graio praesidet iraperio'. Corsi apud Folieta The Genoese occupation of Chios, Lesbos, and Phokaia by the families of Zaccaria and Cattaneo was not forgotten in the counting- houses of the Ligurian Republic. In 1346, two years after the capture of Smyrna, Chios once more passed under Genoese control, the two Foglie followed suite, and in 1355 the strife between John Cantacuzene and John V Palaiologos for the throne of Byzantium enabled a daring Genoese, Francesco Gattilusio, to found a dynasty in Lesbos, which gradually extended its branches to the islands of the Thracian sea and to the city of Ainos on the opposite mainland, and which lasted in the original seat for more than a Century. Disappointed in a previous attempt to recover his rights, the young Emperor John V was at this time living in retirement on the island of Tenedos, then a portion of the Greek Empire and from its position at the mouth of the Dardanelles both an excellent post of obserration and a good base for a descent upon Constantinople. During his so- journ there, a couple of Genoese galleys arrived, commanded by Fran- cesco Gattilusio, a wealthy freebooter, who had sailed from his native oity to onrvp rmt for himself, annidst the confusion of the Orient, a petty principality in the Thracian Chersonese, äs others of his compa- triots had twice done in Chios, äs the Venetian nobles had done in the Archipelago 150 years earlier. The Emperor found in this chance visi- tor an Instrument to effect his own restoration; the two men came to terms, and John V promised, that if Gattilusio would help him to recover his throne, he would bestow upon him the hand of his sister Maria — an honour similar to that conferred by Michael VIII upon Benedetto Zaccaria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Sphere Communications with the French National Assembly's Committee of Research,1789-1791
    The Democratic Sphere Communications with the French National Assembly's Committee of Research,1789-1791 Maia Kirby Queen Mary, University of London Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 I, Maia Olive Claire Kirby, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Maia Kirby Date: 24.08.16 2 Abstract On 28 July 1789 the National Assembly established the Committee of Research as a mechanism through which it could identify threats to its existence from amongst its large correspondence. In the time it was active, the committee received thousands of letters from across France. In the early 1990s the archivist Pierre Caillet wrote a thorough inventory and a general synthesis of the communications which further opened them up as a resource that could provide insight into popular reponses to various themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cahiers Voltaire 16
    cahiers voltaire 16 Cahiers Voltaire Revue annuelle de la société voltaire 16 Ferney-Voltaire 2017 Les Cahiers Voltaire sont publiés par le Centre international d’étude du XVIIIe siècle de Ferney-Voltaire La préparation de ce numéro a été facilitée par les services de la Bibliothèque de Genève et de son Musée Voltaire Correspondance, manuscrits, ouvrages pour compte rendu Cahiers Voltaire, 26 Grand’rue, F-01210 Ferney-Voltaire, [email protected] Les ouvrages pour compte rendu doivent être envoyés sans dédicace personnelle © Société Voltaire et Centre international d’étude du XVIIIe siècle 2017 Diffusé par Amalivre, 62 avenue de Suffren, F-75015 Paris, pour le Centre international d’étude du XVIIIe siècle, 26 Grand’rue, F-01210 Ferney-Voltaire ISBN 978-2-84559-127-1 ISSN 1637-4096 Imprimé en France Études et textes Page précédente et ci-dessus : le bas-relief du monument La Barre érigé à Abbeville et inauguré le 7 juillet 1907. Le monu- ment porte l’inscription « Monument élevé par le prolétariat à l’émancipation intégrale de la pensée humaine » et le bas- relief « En commémoration du martyre du chevalier de La Barre supplicié à Abbeville le 1er juillet 1766 à l’âge de 19 ans pour avoir omis de saluer une procession ». Le monument a été vandalisé en 2013 par l’effacement de cette inscription et par l’ajout de l’emblème de Civitas, groupe catholique intégriste. claude habib, Marc hersant, Myrtille MéricaM-bourdet Table ronde au Panthéon sur l’affaire La Barre, 16 novembre 2016 1 Marc Hersant propose d’abord une présentation générale de l’affaire du chevalier de La Barre : Je remercie le Centre des monuments nationaux de m’avoir proposé de par- ticiper à cet événement, et tout particulièrement Gaëtan Bruel, qui s’occupe du Panthéon, et avec qui la préparation de cette journée a été passionnante.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION 1. Charles Esdaile, the Wars of Napoleon (New York, 1995), Ix; Philip Dwyer, “Preface,” Napoleon and Europe, E
    Notes INTRODUCTION 1. Charles Esdaile, The Wars of Napoleon (New York, 1995), ix; Philip Dwyer, “Preface,” Napoleon and Europe, ed. Philip Dwyer (London, 2001), ix. 2. Michael Broers, Europe under Napoleon, 1799–1815 (London, 1996), 3. 3. An exception to the Franco-centric bibliography in English prior to the last decade is Owen Connelly, Napoleon’s Satellite Kingdoms (New York, 1965). Connelly discusses the developments in five satellite kingdoms: Italy, Naples, Holland, Westphalia, and Spain. Two other important works that appeared before 1990, which explore the internal developments in two countries during the Napoleonic period, are Gabriel Lovett, Napoleon and the Birth of Modern Spain (New York, 1965) and Simon Schama, Patriots and Liberators: Revolution in the Netherlands, 1780–1813 (London, 1977). 4. Stuart Woolf, Napoleon’s Integration of Europe (London and New York, 1991), 8–13. 5. Geoffrey Ellis, “The Nature of Napoleonic Imperialism,” Napoleon and Europe, ed. Philip Dwyer (London, 2001), 102–5; Broers, Europe under Napoleon, passim. 1 THE FORMATION OF THE NAPOLEONIC EMPIRE 1. Geoffrey Ellis, “The Nature of Napoleonic Imperialism,” Napoleon and Europe, ed. Philip Dwyer (London, 2001), 105. 2. Martyn Lyons, Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution (New York, 1994), 43. 3. Ellis, “The Nature,” 104–5. 4. On the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars and international relations, see Tim Blanning, The French Revolutionary Wars, 1787–1802 (London, 1996); David Chandler, The Campaigns of Napoleon: the Mind and Method of History’s Greatest Soldier (London, 1966); Owen Connelly, Blundering to Glory: Napoleon’s Military 212 Notes 213 Campaigns (Wilmington, DE, 1987); J.
    [Show full text]
  • Contraception and the Renaissance of Traditional Marriage
    CHOOSING A LAW TO LIVE BY ONCE THE KING IS GONE INTRODUCTION Law is the expression of the rules by which civilization governs itself, and it must be that in law as elsewhere will be found the fundamental differences of peoples. Here then it may be that we find the underlying cause of the difference between the civil law and the common law.1 By virtue of its origin, the American legal profession has always been influenced by sources of law outside the United States. American law schools teach students the common law, and law students come to understand that the common law is different than the civil law, which is prevalent in Europe.2 Comparative law courses expose law students to the civil law system by comparing American common law with the law of other countries such as France, which has a civil code.3 A closer look at the history of the American and French Revolutions makes one wonder why the legal systems of the two countries are so different. Certainly, the American and French Revolutions were drastically different in some ways. For instance, the French Revolution was notoriously violent during a period known as “the Terror.”4 Accounts of the French revolutionary government executing so many French citizens as well as the creation of the Cult of the Supreme Being5 make the French Revolution a stark contrast to the American Revolution. Despite the differences, the revolutionary French and Americans shared similar goals—liberty and equality for all citizens and an end to tyranny. Both revolutions happened within approximately two decades of each other and were heavily influenced by the Enlightenment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Napoleon Bonaparte on Education Systems and Its Consequences: the Education Revolution on Horseback1
    2 The Effect of Napoleon Bonaparte on Education Systems and its Consequences: The Education Revolution on Horseback1 Abstract: Sociological literature argues that the threat for war with and invasion by the French around the 1800s induced European countries to introduce mass public education systems. On the basis of this theory, the aim of this chapter is twofold: First, it empirically establishes whether the proposed mechanism had an influence on the levels of tracking and standardization in European education systems. Second, it studies whether tracking has an effect on student performance by instrumenting tracking by the political pressure caused by the Napoleonic wars. Especially for tracking, a relation between education systems and the pressure from Napoleon is found. For standardization, no or a much weaker relation is found. Using Napoleon as an instrument for tracking leads to a strong first stage. The resulting analyses show a consistent positive effect between the level of tracking and student performance. 1. I would like to thank Jaap Dronkers and Sjoerd Karsten for bringing the paper of Ramirez and Boli (1987) under my attention, and the Forschungsdatenzentrum am Institut zur Qualitätsentwicklung im Bildungswesen for providing me with the extended PISA data for Germany. I further would like to thank Francisco Ramirez, David Figlio, Bas ter Weel, and participants of the International Workshop on Applied Economics of Education 2013, the Workshop on Comparative systems of educational and political systems at Stanford University, and ESPE 2014 for valuable comments. The Effect of Napoleon Bonaparte on Education Systems and its Consequences “Our view is that European states became engaged in authorizing, funding and managing mass schooling as a part of the endeavor to construct a unified national policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. CHAPTER 1 Introduction French Society in 1789 Historians working on the French Revolution have a problem. All of our attempts to find an explanation in terms of social groups or classes, or particular segments of society becoming powerfully activated, have fallen short. As one expert aptly expressed it: “the truth is we have no agreed general theory of why the French Revolution came about and what it was— and no prospect of one.”1 This gaping, causal void is cer- tainly not due to lack of investigation into the Revolution’s background and origins. If class conflict in the Marxist sense has been jettisoned, other ways of attributing the Revolution to social change have been ex- plored with unrelenting rigor. Of course, every historian agrees society was slowly changing and that along with the steady expansion of trade and the cities, and the apparatus of the state and armed forces, more (and more professional) lawyers, engineers, administrators, officers, medical staff, architects, and naval personnel were increasingly infusing and diversifying the existing order.2 Yet, no major, new socioeconomic pressures of a kind apt to cause sudden, dramatic change have been identified. The result, even some keen revisionists admit, is a “somewhat painful void.”3 Most historians today claim there was not one big cause but instead numerous small contributory impulses. One historian, stressing the absence of any identifiable overriding cause, likened the Revolution’s origins to a “multi- coloured tapestry of interwoven causal factors.”4 So- cial and economic historians embracing the “new social interpretation” identify a variety of difficulties that might have rendered eighteenth- century French society, at least in some respects, more fraught and vulnerable than earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Guerra Del Rosellón. Terror a La Revolución
    Impreso por . Prohibida su reproducción. JACOBINOS CONTRA CARLOS IV L A S C L A V E S INICIO. Francia declaró la gue- rra a España por su hostilidad a GUERRA DEL ROSELLÓN la Convención y la concentración de fuerzas en la frontera. DESARROLLO. Madrid sorpren- dió inicialmente a París, que con- traatacó y ocupó el País Vasco, Navarra y el norte de Cataluña. TERROR A LA FINAL. Con el armisticio, las fronteras volvieron a su origen an- terior a la guerra. Solo la parte es- pañola de la isla de Santo Do- REVOLUCIÓN mingo se concedió a Francia. DESBORDADA POR EL ENTUSIASMO, LA CONVENCIÓN JACOBINA QUISO EXTENDER SU LLAMA REVOLUCIONARIA A UNA EUROPA ABSOLUTISTA DESEOSA DE AHOGAR EN SANGRE AL NUEVO RÉGIMEN. JUAN CARLOS LOSADA REVIVE LA CONTIENDA QUE DURANTE MÁS DE DOS AÑOS ASOLÓ LA ESPAÑA PIRENAICA Y DEJÓ UNA PROFUNDA HUELLA QUE ASENTÓ LAS BASES DE LA RESISTENCIA POPULAR EN 1808 Uniformes de SOLDADOS ESPAÑOLES de 1793. LA AVENTURA DE LA HISTORIA 45 Impreso por . Prohibida su reproducción. JACOBINOS CONTRA CARLOS IV A GUERRA ENTRE LA FRAN- CIA REVOLUCIONARIA Y LA GENERAL RICARDOS, retratado por Goya. ESPAÑA DE CARLOS IV se L Experimentado declaró el 7 de marzo militar y buen conocedor de los de 1793. Luis XVI ha- Pirineos, con unos bía sido ejecutado y el 30.000 efectivos encabezó la ofensiva miedo al contagio revolucionario se ha- inicial española. bía extendido por toda Europa, por lo que sus monarcas estaban decididos a ahogar en sangre al nuevo régimen fran- cés. La guerra la declaró la Convención argumentando la abierta hostilidad a la República, junto con la concentración de fuerzas en la frontera.
    [Show full text]