LAVOISIER-The Crucial Year the Background and Origin of His First

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LAVOISIER-The Crucial Year the Background and Origin of His First LAVOISIER-THE CRUCIAL YEAR: The Background and Origin of His First Experiments on Combustion in z772 Antoine Laurent Lavoisier, 17 43-1794, a portrait by David (Photo Roger-Viollet) LA VOISIER -The Crucial Year The Background and Origin of His First Experiments on Combustion in 1772 /J_y llenr_y (Juerlac CORNELL UNIVERSITY CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS Ithaca, New York Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. This work has been brought to publication with the assistance of a grant from the Ford Foundation. Copyright © 1961 by Cornell University First paperback printing 2019 The text of this book is li censed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommerciai-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. To use this book, or parts of this book, in any way not covered by the li cense, please contact Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. Visit our website at cornellpress.cornell.edu. Printed in the United States of America ISBN 978- 1-501 7-4663-5 (pbk.: alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-5017-4664-2 (pdf) ISBN 978-1-5017-4665-9 ( epub/mobi) Librarians: A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress TO Andrew Norman Meldrum (1876-1934) AND Helene Metzger (188g-1944) Acknowledgments MUCH of the research and much of the writing of a first draft of this book was completed while I was a mem­ ber of the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, in 1953-1955. To the Institute's distinguished director, Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer, and to the late Edward Mead Earle, I am especially indebted for the privilege of those two unhampered years of research and study. I wish to thank Mrs. Marian Hartz for secretarial assistance and Miss Judith Sachs, librarian of the Institute, for guiding an importunate visitor to needed reference materials and to the riches of the great Rosenwald collection of rare books in the history of science. The completion of the manuscript was postponed until I could consult the second volume ( 1957 ) of Lavoisier's Correspondance, covering the years 1772-1775. In the meantime, with the resources of Cornell's fine basic col­ lection in the history of science, I was able to dispose of certain controverted matters-such as the dating of Lavoisier's February memorandum-and publish the re­ sults separately as articles. At all stages of my investiga­ tions I have drawn extravagantly on my treasury of grace with the devoted staff of the Cornell University Library. I owe special thanks to Dr. Felix Reichmann for his speed vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS and skill in obtaining rare books for the collection and to Miss Josephine Tharpe and Miss Frances Lauman for the many services reference librarians in their mysterious way know how to perform. I wish also to thank their colleagues in the other American libraries where I have worked, especially the Harvard University Library, the Princeton University Library, and the libraries of the New York Academy of Medicine and of the American Philo­ sophical Society in Philadelphia. For their willingness to send rare books and periodicals on interlibrary loan, I am grateful to a number of institutions and persons, espe­ cially to the Yale Medical Historical Library under the direction of Dr. Frederick Kilgour and to the University of Wisconsin, which has generously made available rare items from its remarkable collection of works in early chemistry. Like many another foreign scholar, in Paris I have enjoyed the hospitality of the Bibliotheque Nationale, the library of the Institut de France and of the Museum d'Histoire Naturelle. At the archives of the Academie des Sciences I have been helped on repeated occasions by Mme Pierre Gauja and her staff ithw that unfailing cour­ tesy and efficiency they have shown so many visiting his­ torians of science. Aid and stimulation have come from many friends and fellow workers in the history of science; chief among them are Professor Marie Boas, Dr. Uno Boklund, Dr. Maurice Daumas, Dr. Eduard Farber, M. Rene Frie, Professor Aaron Ihde, Professor Milton Kerker, Father Patrick John McLaughlin, Professor Robert Schofield, Professor Cyril Stanley Smith, and Dr. Owsei Temkin. Mr. Denis I. Duveen has lent generously from his rich collection of viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Lavoisier's books and manuscripts, has discussed with me many aspects of my problem, and has given me the bene­ fit of his deep bibliographical knowledge and wide familiarity with Lavoisier's work. I am glad, also, to record my appreciation to the mem­ bers, past and present, of my seminar in the history of science at Cornell who have heard parts of this study presented for their candid and constructive comments. In particular, I wish to thank Miss Rhoda Rappaport and Mr. Roger Hahn for many helpful suggestions and for their careful reading of the manuscript. I assume, of course, full responsibility for the errors of commission and omission that are sure to be called to my attention by others, or that I shall have the dubious pleasure of dis­ covering-too late-for myseH. The final versions of the typescript-the work of Mrs. Anita Reed, Mrs. C. C. Arnold, and Mrs. Robert M. Garcia-were prepared with the help of a subsidy from Cornell's Faculty Research Grants Committee. Apologies are perhaps due to the reader for my practice of leaving all my citations in the original French; still more, perhaps, for my decision to reproduce all texts exactly as I found them. Thus some citations appear with modernized spelling and punctuation, others as they were printed in the eighteenth century, and still others as they appear in the contemporary manuscripts with their fanci­ ful disregard of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling. In part, I wished to conform with the example set by the editor of the Correspondance de Lavoisier; but my prin­ cipal reason was that I wished to make available to scholars, in the body of the work and in the appendix, all ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS documents known to me bearing on this phase of Lavoi­ sier' s career and to intrude upon them as little as possible. We have long wished to have these documents brought together; and those who may be disposed to challenge my interpretation with my own weapons will find them here unrusted and with their original temper. HENRY GUERLAC December 15, 1960 x Contents Introduction xiii 1 Background of the Problem 1 2 The Introduction of Pneumatic Chemistry into France 36 3 The Origin of Lavoisier's Experiments-Some Theories Examined and Some New Evidence 76 4 The Mysterious Calcination of Metals 111 5 A Striking Anticipation of Lavoisier's Theory 146 6 Lavoisier, Phosphorus, and the Role of Mitouard 156 Conclusion 192 Appendix 197 Index 231 xi Plates Antoine Laurent Lavoisier, 1743-1794 frontispiece The plates will be found between pages 106 and 107 1. The solar calcination of antimony according to Nicolas Le Fevre, 1660 2. A French portrait engraving of Stephen Hales, 1677-1761 3. Louis Bernard Guyton de Morveau, 1737-1816 4. Jean Charles Philibert Trudaine de Montigny, 1733-1777 5. Anne Robert Jacques Turgot, 1721-1781 6. Pierre Joseph Macquer, 1718-1784 7. Frangois Rozier, 1734-1793 8. Antoine Baume, 1728-1804 9. Balthazar Georges Sage, 1740-1824 10. Nicholas Desmarest, 1725-1815 11. N. J. von Jacquin, 1727-1817 xii Introduction IN this study I have tried to shed some light on a particu­ larly obscure, yet especially noteworthy, period in the career of the great French chemist, Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794 ). We are quite familiar with his early years of scientific apprenticeship, when his inter­ ests ranged over a wide variety of scientific problems; and though much is still to be learned about the work of his mature years, there is a substantial literature dealing with Lavoisier's discovery of the role of oxygen, his share in the revision of chemical nomenclature, and other as­ pects of his massive scientific achievement. But we have understood very imperfectly, if at all, the time of Lavoi­ sier's life when he took the fortunate step of turning to the central problem of combustion. If we cannot know why, and precisely when, he entered on this new path, we will be at a loss to account for one of the truly significant new departures in the history of science. My primary concern, therefore, has been to determine when, in what manner, and under what influences Lavoi­ sier was led before February, 1773, to the key experi­ ments and generative ideas that touched off the Chemical Revolution. In historical episodes of this importance, a study of origins-even one as detailed as this has turned xiii INTRODUCTION out to be-needs no special defense. But if my findings can help illuminate the broader problem of the scientific revolution in chemistry (to which our modern age owes so much), the reader may perhaps forgive the rather intricate argument I have been forced to present in this work. We need hardly stress Lavoisier's pivotal position in the history of chemistry and his role as the chief archi­ tect of the Chemical Revolution. He is one of those epoch­ making figures in the history of science-like Newton in physics and Darwin in biology-who loom larger than life. If he did not create a new science ex nihilo, as some earlier writers believed, he and his disciples nevertheless refashioned the materials, the concepts, and even the language of chemistry so radically that, despite a long and complex early history, the science as we know it to­ day seems almost to have been born with him.
Recommended publications
  • Jacques-Louis David's 'Oath of the Tennis Court'
    EXTENSION ACTIVITIES – Jacques-Louis David’s ‘Oath of the Tennis Court’, 1791 Read the discussion of Jacques-Louis-David’s ‘Oath of the Tennis Court’ (1791) on p. 3-8 of this handout. Then complete the following extension activities: 1. One of the big problems which faced David as the Revolution progressed was that many of the figures to whom he had given prominence in the 1791 drawing fell from favour as political conditions changed. Using Liberating France (including the Who’s Who) and other sources, find out what happened to Mounier, Mirabeau, Bailly, Barère, Barnave, and Robespierre. Then research the clergymen, Abbé Grégoire and Abbé Sieyès. 2. David alludes to the popular movement which became known as the sans-culottes through the strong and robust figure in the red bonnet of liberty in the lower left hand corner. Referring to Liberating France (including the Section B Timeline), write a paragraph to outline the role played by the sans-culottes movement from 10 August 1792 until the days of Germinal and Prairial Year III, (1 April and 20-23 May 1795). 3. Using Liberating France (including the Who’s Who) and other sources, outline David’s revolutionary career – both as a painter and as a politician. In your answer consider the importance his paintings and drawings 1789-1795, and his role in organising public ceremonies. Then investigate his political activities as a deputy in the National Convention. 4. David uses at least eight revolutionary ideas in his 1791 study of the Tennis Court Oath. Locate them and any other revolutionary ideas not mentioned in the summary above.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers from the Lindley Library © 2011
    Occasional Papers from The RHS Lindley Library IBRARY L INDLEY L , RHS VOLUME FIVE MARCH 2011 Eighteenth-century Science in the Garden Cover illustration: Hill, Vegetable System, vol. 23 (1773) plate 20: Flower-de-luces, or Irises. Left, Iris tuberosa; right, Iris xiphium. Occasional Papers from the RHS Lindley Library Editor: Dr Brent Elliott Production & layout: Richard Sanford Printed copies are distributed to libraries and institutions with an interest in horticulture. Volumes are also available on the RHS website (www. rhs.org.uk/occasionalpapers). Requests for further information may be sent to the Editor at the address (Vincent Square) below, or by email ([email protected]). Access and consultation arrangements for works listed in this volume The RHS Lindley Library is the world’s leading horticultural library. The majority of the Library’s holdings are open access. However, our rarer items, including many mentioned throughout this volume, are fragile and cannot take frequent handling. The works listed here should be requested in writing, in advance, to check their availability for consultation. Items may be unavailable for various reasons, so readers should make prior appointments to consult materials from the art, rare books, archive, research and ephemera collections. It is the Library’s policy to provide or create surrogates for consultation wherever possible. We are actively seeking fundraising in support of our ongoing surrogacy, preservation and conservation programmes. For further information, or to request an appointment, please contact: RHS Lindley Library, London RHS Lindley Library, Wisley 80 Vincent Square RHS Garden Wisley London SW1P 2PE Woking GU23 6QB T: 020 7821 3050 T: 01483 212428 E: [email protected] E : [email protected] Occasional Papers from The RHS Lindley Library Volume 5, March 2011 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovery of the Elements — a Historical Sketch of the Discoveries
    REDISCOVERY OF THE ELEMENTS — A HISTORICAL SKETCH OF THE DISCOVERIES TABLE OF CONTENTS incantations. The ancient Greeks were the first to Introduction ........................1 address the question of what these principles 1. The Ancients .....................3 might be. Water was the obvious basic 2. The Alchemists ...................9 essence, and Aristotle expanded the Greek 3. The Miners ......................14 philosophy to encompass a obscure mixture of 4. Lavoisier and Phlogiston ...........23 four elements — fire, earth, water, and air — 5. Halogens from Salts ...............30 as being responsible for the makeup of all 6. Humphry Davy and the Voltaic Pile ..35 materials of the earth. As late as 1777, scien- 7. Using Davy's Metals ..............41 tific texts embraced these four elements, even 8. Platinum and the Noble Metals ......46 though a over-whelming body of evidence 9. The Periodic Table ................52 pointed out many contradictions. It was taking 10. The Bunsen Burner Shows its Colors 57 thousands of years for mankind to evolve his 11. The Rare Earths .................61 thinking from Principles — which were 12. The Inert Gases .................68 ethereal notions describing the perceptions of 13. The Radioactive Elements .........73 this material world — to Elements — real, 14. Moseley and Atomic Numbers .....81 concrete basic stuff of this universe. 15. The Artificial Elements ...........85 The alchemists, who devoted untold Epilogue ..........................94 grueling hours to transmute metals into gold, Figs. 1-3. Mendeleev's Periodic Tables 95-97 believed that in addition to the four Aristo- Fig. 4. Brauner's 1902 Periodic Table ...98 telian elements, two principles gave rise to all Fig. 5. Periodic Table, 1925 ...........99 natural substances: mercury and sulfur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Sphere Communications with the French National Assembly's Committee of Research,1789-1791
    The Democratic Sphere Communications with the French National Assembly's Committee of Research,1789-1791 Maia Kirby Queen Mary, University of London Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 I, Maia Olive Claire Kirby, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Maia Kirby Date: 24.08.16 2 Abstract On 28 July 1789 the National Assembly established the Committee of Research as a mechanism through which it could identify threats to its existence from amongst its large correspondence. In the time it was active, the committee received thousands of letters from across France. In the early 1990s the archivist Pierre Caillet wrote a thorough inventory and a general synthesis of the communications which further opened them up as a resource that could provide insight into popular reponses to various themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Potion Making by Sam Gayton I Hope You Find These Resources and Activities Useful
    Potion Making by Sam Gayton I hope you find these resources and activities useful. There are two different activities that I’ve included here. You’re welcome to use or adapt them in any way you see fit. All of the resources are linked to my book The Snow Merchant, which is a story that features alchemy. You might like to read about alchemy in the All About Alchemy sheet — or you could read the first few chapters of Potion Making The Snow Merchant. by Sam Gayton Suitable for: 7 years and above. Type of activity: art, storytelling, writing Aim: to increase pupils’ confidence around hands-on activities, story-telling and writing. Activity 1: Potion Making Watch the video, and get ready to become an alchemist! Once you’ve made your potions, there are all sorts of extension activities you could try: writing down a recipe, or even trying to create a story that begins with someone drinking your potions — either on purpose, or accidentally! Activity 2: Using Music To Inspire Writing Choose a track from the list provided, sit back and listen, then listen to it again while writing with the accompanying writing prompt. Happy potion-brewing! Sam. Sam Gayton Sam is the writer of fantasy-filled children’s books, including Hercufleas and The Last Zoo. He delivers workshops for schools as part of Pop Up Festival. Find out more about Sam here: www.samgayton.com POTION MAKING BY SAM GAYTON PAGE 1 / 10 Activity 1 Potion Making. All About Alchemy What exactly is alchemy, anyway? Well… like Dr John Dee, the court astronomer and adviser to Elizabeth I.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Mirlinda Biba 2021 North Jersey Section Chair
    JANUARY 2021 Vol. 102 • No. 1A ISSN0019-6924 Dr. Mirlinda Biba 2021 North Jersey Section Chair See article on page 5. www.theindicator.org www.njacs.org www.newyorkacs.org 2 THE INDICATOR-JANUARY 2021 THIS MONTH IN CHEMICAL HISTORY Harold Goldwhite, California State University, Los Angeles • [email protected] Most of the works I have discussed or will discuss in upcoming columns dedicated to “Great Books of Chemistry” are by authors whose names are likely to be familiar to you. But this col- umn’s book is by someone you probably have not heard of unless you are quite familiar with 17th Century science. This author is Nicolas Lemery, born in Rouen in November 1644 or 1645, died in Paris in 1715. His father was a lawyer to the Normandy Parliament and a Protestant. Nicolas was apprenticed to a pharmacist who was a relative, but he moved to Paris in 1666 to work at the Jardin du Roi, the Royal Botanic Garden that included science laboratories, and sponsored science lectures. (Lavoisier, a century later, learned much of his chemistry at this institution.) Lemery’s mentor was Glaser but they did not get on and he moved to Montpellier where he set up a laboratory, made and sold chemicals and pharma- ceuticals, and began to give lectures on chemistry illustrated by experiments. These lectures established his fame and attracted many (paying) attendees including women and foreign students. Lemery’s Protestant faith led to conflicts with the Catholic authorities and from 1683-84 he visited Protestant England. Returning to France he earned an M.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. CHAPTER 1 Introduction French Society in 1789 Historians working on the French Revolution have a problem. All of our attempts to find an explanation in terms of social groups or classes, or particular segments of society becoming powerfully activated, have fallen short. As one expert aptly expressed it: “the truth is we have no agreed general theory of why the French Revolution came about and what it was— and no prospect of one.”1 This gaping, causal void is cer- tainly not due to lack of investigation into the Revolution’s background and origins. If class conflict in the Marxist sense has been jettisoned, other ways of attributing the Revolution to social change have been ex- plored with unrelenting rigor. Of course, every historian agrees society was slowly changing and that along with the steady expansion of trade and the cities, and the apparatus of the state and armed forces, more (and more professional) lawyers, engineers, administrators, officers, medical staff, architects, and naval personnel were increasingly infusing and diversifying the existing order.2 Yet, no major, new socioeconomic pressures of a kind apt to cause sudden, dramatic change have been identified. The result, even some keen revisionists admit, is a “somewhat painful void.”3 Most historians today claim there was not one big cause but instead numerous small contributory impulses. One historian, stressing the absence of any identifiable overriding cause, likened the Revolution’s origins to a “multi- coloured tapestry of interwoven causal factors.”4 So- cial and economic historians embracing the “new social interpretation” identify a variety of difficulties that might have rendered eighteenth- century French society, at least in some respects, more fraught and vulnerable than earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phosphorus Story: Sustainable Nutrient Management at the Robert W
    The Phosphorus Story: Sustainable Nutrient Management at the Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility Englewood PWO Seminar – February 7, 2019 Dan Freedman, MWRD Nate Brown, Stantec Agenda • Background on Phosphorus • Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility Background • The District’s Phosphorus Initiative • Liquid Stream Phosphorus Removal • Solids Stream Phosphorus Recovery • The Future of Phosphorus Management Background on Phosphorus (The Most Interesting Element in the World) The Lucifer of Liege by Guillaume Geefs Image by Luc Viatour What even is Phosphorus? • In Greek mythology, Phosphorus was the god “Light Bringer” otherwise known as The Morning Star (aka the planet Venus) • The Latin translation of Phosphorus is Lucifer Image source ‐ John Lemieux, flickr.com Image source ‐ https://lystek.com/ The Alchymist, In Search of the Philosopher’s Stone, Discovers Phosphorus, and prays for the successful Conclusion of his operation, as was the custom of the Ancient Alchymical Astrologers How was Phosphorus by Joseph Wright of Derby first discovered? • Discovered in 1669 by Hennig Brand whilst searching for the “philosopher’s stone” • Brand attempted to create the stone through distillation of salts by evaporating urine • Through the process he produced a material that made a brilliant white light, hence the name phosphorus Image source ‐ https://lystek.com/ Why is Phosphorus important? “Life can multiply until all the phosphorus is gone, and then there is an inexorable halt which nothing can prevent. We may be able to substitute nuclear power for coal, and plastics for wood, and yeast for meat, and friendliness for isolation—but for phosphorus there is neither substitute nor replacement.” ‐Isaac Asimov from Asimov on Chemistry Image source ‐ John Lemieux, flickr.com Image source ‐Image source ‐ https://lystek.com/ https://lystek.com/ Image source – DC Comics Who is Phosphorus? While working at a nuclear power plant, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Journal for the History of Science Mechanical Experiments As Moral Exercise in the Education of George
    The British Journal for the History of Science http://journals.cambridge.org/BJH Additional services for The British Journal for the History of Science: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Mechanical experiments as moral exercise in the education of George III FLORENCE GRANT The British Journal for the History of Science / Volume 48 / Issue 02 / June 2015, pp 195 - 212 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087414000582, Published online: 01 August 2014 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0007087414000582 How to cite this article: FLORENCE GRANT (2015). Mechanical experiments as moral exercise in the education of George III. The British Journal for the History of Science, 48, pp 195-212 doi:10.1017/ S0007087414000582 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/BJH, IP address: 130.132.173.207 on 07 Jul 2015 BJHS 48(2): 195–212, June 2015. © British Society for the History of Science 2014 doi:10.1017/S0007087414000582 First published online 1 August 2014 Mechanical experiments as moral exercise in the education of George III FLORENCE GRANT* Abstract. In 1761, George III commissioned a large group of philosophical instruments from the London instrument-maker George Adams. The purchase sprang from a complex plan of moral education devised for Prince George in the late 1750s by the third Earl of Bute. Bute’s plan applied the philosophy of Frances Hutcheson, who placed ‘the culture of the heart’ at the foundation of moral education. To complement this affective development, Bute also acted on seventeenth-century arguments for the value of experimental philosophy and geometry as exercises that habituated the student to recognizing truth, and to pursuing it through long and difficult chains of reasoning.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Christina's Esoteric Interests As a Background to Her
    SUSANNA ÅKERMAN Queen Christina’s Esoteric Interests as a Background to Her Platonic Academies n 1681 the blind quietist, Francois Malaval, stated that Queen Christina of Sweden late in life had ‘given up’ [Hermes] Trismegistos and the IPlatonists, in favour of the Church fathers. The statement does not ex- plain what role the Church fathers were to play in her last years, but it does show that Christina really had been interested in the rather elitist and esoteric doctrine of Hermetic Platonic Christianity. In this paper I shall look at her library to show the depth of this Hermetic involvement. Her interest serves as a background to her life as ex-queen in Italy after her famous abdication from the Swedish throne in 1654, when she was 27 years old. Christina styled herself as the Convert of the Age, and she set up court in Rome where she held a series of scientific and cultural acad- emies in her palace. Her Accademia Reale was staged briefly in the Palazzo Farnese in her first year in Rome, 1656, but was revived in 1674 and was held for a number of years in her own Palazzo Riario.1 Also, Giovanni Ciampini’s Accademia dell’Esperienze, also called Ac­­ cademia Fisico-mathematico, gathered there for their first founding meeting in 1677. Furthermore, she was protectress of the Accademia degli Stravaganti in Collegio Clementina from 1678 and in Orvieto for the Accademia dei Misti. (Christina 1966: 377, cited below as NMU.) Her inspirational presence and resources were valued by many liter- ary figures. After her death in 1689, she was chosen to be a symbolic figurehead, Basilissa (Greek for Empress), by the poets that formed the Accademia dell’Arcadia (D’Onofrio 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Hunt, Stephen E. "'Free, Bold, Joyous': the Love of Seaweed in Margaret Gatty and Other Mid–Victorian Writers." Environment and History 11, No
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Hunt, Stephen E. "'Free, Bold, Joyous': The Love of Seaweed in Margaret Gatty and Other Mid–Victorian Writers." Environment and History 11, no. 1 (February 2005): 5–34. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/3221. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 2005. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. ʻFree, Bold, Joyousʼ: The Love of Seaweed in Margaret Gatty and Other Mid-Victorian Writers STEPHEN E. HUNT Wesley House, 10 Milton Park, Redfield, Bristol, BS5 9HQ Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT With particular reference to Gattyʼs British Sea-Weeds and Eliotʼs ʻRecollections of Ilfracombeʼ, this article takes an ecocritical approach to popular writings about seaweed, thus illustrating the broader perception of the natural world in mid-Victorian literature. This is a discursive exploration of the way that the enthusiasm for seaweed reveals prevailing ideas about propriety, philanthropy and natural theology during the Victorian era, incorporating social history, gender issues and natural history in an interdisciplinary manner. Although unchaperoned wandering upon remote shorelines remained a questionable activity for women, ʻseaweedingʼ made for a direct aesthetic engagement with the specificity of place in a way that conforms to Barbara Gatesʼs notion of the ʻVictorian female sublimeʼ.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhabiting New France: Bodies, Environment and the Sacred, C.1632-C.1700
    Inhabiting New France: Bodies, Environment and the Sacred, c.1632-c.1700 Robin Macdonald PhD University of York History September 2015 2 Abstract The historiography of colonial and ‘religious’ encounters in New France has tended to focus on encounters between human beings, between ‘colonisers’ and ‘colonised’ or ‘natives’ and ‘newcomers’. This thesis will focus on encounters between people and environment. Drawing on recent anthropology, notably the work of Tim Ingold, it will argue that whilst bodies shaped environment, environment also could shape bodies – and their associated religious practices. Through the examination of a broad variety of source materials – in particular, the Jesuit Relations – this thesis will explore the myriad ways in which the sacred was created and experienced between c.1632 and c.1700. Beginning with the ocean crossing to New France – an area largely unexplored in the historiographical literature – it will argue that right from the outset of a missionary’s journey, his or her practices were shaped by encounters with both humans and non-humans, by weather or the stormy Ocean Sea. Reciprocally, it will argue, missionary bodies and practices could shape these environments. Moving next to the mission terrain, it will analyse a variety spaces – both environmental and imaginary – tracing the slow build up of belief through habitual practices. Finally, it will chart the movement of missionaries and missionary correspondence from New France back to France. It was not only missionaries, it will argue, who could experience
    [Show full text]