DRAFTDECEMBER 15, 2015

W INNETKA Bikeway Master Plan December 2015 ,\

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Park and Recreation Board Task Force Committee Special Thanks To

Richard Pierce, President Terry Schwartz, Executive Director GIS Consortium Winnetka Park District Brad McLane, Vice President Cook County Government Robert Smith, Superintendent of Parks Department of Geographic Information Systems John DiCola, Commissioner Winnetka Park District

Edward Harney, Commissioner Tom Gullen, Superintendent of Facilities Winnetka Park District Gerri Kahnweiler, Commissioner Patrick Kreis, Police Chief Ian Larkin, Commissioner Village of Winnetka

John Thomas, Commissioner Susan Chen, Assistant Village Engineer Village of Winnetka

Don Maloney, President Bike Winnetka

Barb Cornew Active Transportation Alliance and Winnetka Resident

Terry Dason Chamber of Commerce

Bill Mckinley BMO Harris Bank

Larry Faulkner Green Bay Cycles

Eric Chan Greeley / Washburne School

Brian Miller Office of Cook County Commissioner Larry Suffredin

2 ,\

CONTENTS

Project Team 05 Executive Summary

07 Research and Analysis

17 Opportunities and Challenges

21 Recommendations

35 Implementation Strategy

45 Appendix A: Funding Matrix

49 Appendix B: Community Bicycle Network Maps

53 Appendix C: East - West Connector Trail Options

57 Appendix D: Public Meeting Comments

60 Appendix E: 2012 Maps

75 Appendix F: Other Community Survey Responses

83 Appendix G: Council Meeting Minutes

On the Cover Photo of Winnetka Avenue, just West of .

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 3 4 INTRODUCTION “Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride.” -John F. Kennedy By investing in and implementing the bicycle facility improvements, In the age of rising oil prices, increased concern for the impact of educational and encouragement opportunities, the Winnetka Park automobile pollution on the environment, and the heightened District and Village will ultimately make bicycling a safer, more viable awareness for physical well-being, bicycling is steadily becoming a mode of travel. Ensuring the implementation of this plan will bring a more popular mode of travel for many. With the expected increase significant increase in the number of cyclists within the community. in bicycle use in communities such as Winnetka, it is important for This will require strong leadership from local elected officials, communities to develop comprehensive plans that allow bicycles to cooperation between a host of jurisdictional agencies, schools, and become a viable mode of transportation. In recognizing this need, village departments, along with continued public involvement the Winnetka Park District has commissioned the Winnetka Bikeway throughout the process. Master Plan.

The Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan aims to serve Winnetka residents for EXECUTIVE SUMMARY generations to come. This document lays out in clear detail a visionary, Background yet practical action strategy to make Winnetka one of ’s finest The Winnetka Park District commissioned the development of a bicycling communities. It provides the necessary framework needed Bikeway Master Plan in December 2011. The initiative began with to make bicycling a viable choice for a wide range of users. With the development of a task force to help guide the plan objectives, local and regional support for greener, more efficient transportation preferred connections, understand existing challenges, and consider alternatives, Winnetka residents and community leaders are well- routes. The task force included a diverse group of stakeholders to positioned to create a bicycle network that supports all. The Winnetka provide insight from various perspectives and involve representatives Bikeway Master Plan provides the framework for: important to implementation of the plan. Through the process several public workshops were held to review preliminary plans with • Developing safe, connected bicycle routes residents and solicit their input. • Providing access to local and regional amenities • Developing programs for bicycle education and The Park Board adopted the initial Master Plan document in April encouragement 2012 in order to present the Plan to the Village Plan Commission. • Securing the resources needed to implement the network Following Plan Commission review and comment, additional public • Establishing city policies that are supportive of bicycling meetings were held in order to refine the Plan in advance of presen- • Enhancing the quality of life for residents tation to the Village Council in April 2013. Following Village Council review, amendments to the Plan were put on hold while the Park While many of Winnetka’s residents and visitors currently bicycle within District and Village focused on other priorities and projects in the the community, many more would do the same if new improvements community. The Park Board directed staff to finalize the Plan Amend- such as signed bicycle routes, bike lanes, and bicycle parking were ments in 2015 at which point additional public meetings were held provided throughout the village. and further refinements were incorporated into the Master Plan.

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 5 The Amended Plan was presented to the Village Council in October Recommendations 2015 and received support for implementation of Phase One which The proposed network is divided into three categories, 1st Priority includes the separated multi-use trail along Hibbard Road, signed Network, 2nd Priority Network, and Other Potential Links. The first route along Elm Street, and a marked shared lane along Sheridan two priority networks focus on routes for east-west connections which is being implemented by IDOT. since there are already two regional north-south routes through the community, and connections to those regional trails. Through these routes connectivity will also be provided for schools, parks, business Goals and Use of the Plan districts, and stations within the community. Proposed While the Master Plan addresses connectivity, supports amenities, wayfinding signage should be provided to assist with identification signage, and implementation steps, the focus of the Plan of the routes and destinations, as well as promoting access to the amendments were to refine the proposed routes based on public business districts from the Green Bay trail. and Village input obtained over the course of the Plan review. The 1st Priority Network proposes connections based on route de- The Bikeway Master Plan is to serve as a guide for the development velopment that is already in progress and are low cost opportunities. of a bikeway network throughout the community with the following This network includes the separated multi-use trail along Hibbard objectives: Road that is partially completed, a marked shared lane along Sheri- • Enhance the quality of life for Winnetka residents dan which is being implemented by IDOT, and a signed route along • Provide safe access and wayfinding to and from regional Elm Street to provide an initial east west route that is also central to trails, parks, schools, and other community destinations the community. • Identify beneficial amenities and facilities that can support the bikeway network and bicycling activity The 2nd Priority routes propose to expand the network for connec- • Provide a guide for implementation, further public tivity to the three Green Bay Trail access points and additional school, engagement, and inter-agency cooperation park, and neighborhood connections. This network includes signed routes along Linden, Lincoln, and Maple Streets; extension of the Hibbard separated multi-use trail from Willow to Winnetka; a separat- The Plan is intended to identify preferred routes based on ed multi-use trail along Winnetka Avenue, Harp Road, and a segment community and task force input, analysis of site conditions, and of Willow Road; and separated multi-use trail along Forest Way Drive. recognized standards. The Park District will need to work with the Village and other applicable agencies as each phase is considered The remainder of the proposed routes are categorized as Other for implementation. This Master Plan is not a design or engineering Potential Links that can strengthen the east-west connections to the document and implementation of each phase will require further north and south of the community but require more intensive analy- analysis of site conditions, planning, and engineering. Alternate sis, long term planning, and community engagement to confirm and routes are to be studied further during implementation in refine the routes according to constraints, available resources, and conjunction with community engagement of each neighborhood neighborhood preferences. specific to the route(s) being considered. The proposed routes are subject to modification based on further analysis, engineering, and Neighborhood interest.

6 RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

7 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY MAP

GLENCOE Park District Limits Village Limits

Scale 1”=3,500’ COOK COUNTY N 0 1,750’ 3,500’ FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT

LAKE 94 MICHIGAN WINNETKA NORTHFIELD

INDIAN HILL GOLF CLUB KENILWORTH

WILMETTE

8 RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS SUMMARY The initial phase of this project included extensive research and neighborhoods, businesses, parks, and the already existing analysis that intended to construct a more complete picture of trails located throughout the village. To better understand these the challenges and opportunities present within Winnetka and its connections, the design team performed detailed GIS mapping of the surrounding region. To better understand the study area the project study area to aid in the planning process. The following list includes team researched past resources, existing roadway conditions, land many of the common connectivity issues found within the project and roadway ownership, circulation routes and desired connections. boundaries and are explored in greater detail throughout this chapter. Along the way the design team sought input and recommendations from the following individuals and groups: • Providing safe east-west routes within the project boundary • Linking existing open space areas • Task Force Committee: Comprised of various village staff • Ensuring safe bicycle routes to schools members, local business owners, and village residents, this • Providing a bicycle link from the Green Bay Trail to the North group provided invaluable input and served as an important Branch Trail voice throughout the entirety of the project. • Providing bicycle routes to all four business centers • Village of Winnetka: Several meetings were conducted with • Providing access to the nearby Metra stations village engineering staff members to review plans and help determine current and future infrastructure improvements. Existing Roadways • Public Input: A meeting with the public was conducted and Initial research and analysis was performed on selected roadways provided insight into the needs and desires of the residents within the study area. With direction from the park district, task force of Winnetka. committee, and public input, selected roadways were studied to • Field Visits: Numerous field visits were conducted and quantify their suitability for on-road bicyclists. This Bicycle Level of recorded with digital photography. During each of the field Service is located on pages 14 and 15 of this chapter. visits obstacles and opportunities were documented. • Neighboring Land/Roadway Owners: Meetings were Current Development Projects conducted with neighboring land holders, including Cook There are several projects currently planned within the corridor County Forest Preserve, Village of Northfield, and IDOT to study area. Although these projects range in funding, jurisdiction, gain consensus of the overall bikeway plan and project vision. and timeframe, it is important to anticipate future improvements and to integrate bicycle friendly facilities, when possible. The ability Study Area to do so, will largely determine the overall success of the project. The The Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan study area is defined by the following planned projects have been incorporated into the phased Winnetka Park District boundary which extends past Village limits, as implementation plan of the Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan. seen on the map to the left, and provides the added benefit of linking bicycle facilities across multiple jurisdictions. • Willow Road and Forestway Drive Intersection Improvements • Hibbard Road/Skokie Playfield Improvements Connections • Winnetka Road Bridge @ A primary goal of the Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan is to establish • Winnetka Road from Hibbard Road to I-94 safe, efficient, connected routes. This includes connections to

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 9 LAND OWNERSHIP

Existing Park School Golf Course GLENCOE Forest Preserve Glencoe Park Park District Limits Village Limits Hubbard Woods Park Scale 1”=1,500’ N 0 750’ 1,500’

Sacred Heart School Tower Road Park

TOWER RD Lloyd Park Nick Corwin Park

Lake Michigan Bell Woods Hubbard Woods Maple Street Park Elem. School Sheridan Park Cook County Winnetka Forest Preserve GREEN BAY RD District Golf Club HIBBARD RD West Elm Street Park Skokie Playfield

NORTHFIELD ELM ST MAPLE ST

Willow Park FORESTWAY DR Skokie SHERIDAN RD (NPD) School Northshore County Village Day School Green Greeley Elementary New Trier Park School High School

Fields GLENDALE AVE Winnetka Park District WILLOW RD Boundary Elder Park Northfield Park (NPD) Centennial Park Clarkson Park (NPD) Crow Island Elem. School St. Faith Hope Indian Hill Park W. P. D. Crow Island Park Service HILL RD Happ Road Park Center

WINNETKA AVE WINNETKA AVE

New Trier High School West Indian Hill GREEN BAY RD Golf Club WILMETTE KENILWORTH

10 LAND/ROADWAY OWNERSHIP The study area boundary, or park district boundary, is comprised of various parks, schools, open space, and local and state roadways. As expected with any bikeway planning, there are a large number of land owners and constituents that need to be directly involved in the successful implementation of the bikeway plan. There are six major land/roadway owners that are critical in developing the full vision of the bikeway master plan.

IDOT The following roadways are under state control: Green Bay Road, Sheridan Road, and segments of Tower Road and Willow Road.

Many people use the Green Bay Trail which provides a valuable regional connection to the area. Village of Winnetka While the majority of open space is owned by the park district, key portions are owned by the Village including: Village Green, Green Bay Trail easement, and smaller pocket parks found throughout the village.

Winnetka Park District The Park District currently owns 220.5 acres of open space while maintaining an additional 14 acres owned by the Village.

Cook County Forest Preserve Located along the western edge of Winnetka sits the 190 acre Skokie Lagoons. This area serves as a major recreational area for village residents and a key north-south link to nearby communities. Crow Island Park, one of many Park District open spaces.

Public and Private Schools Similar to the parks system, schools located in Winnetka are characterized by being well-planned and spaced out.

Neighboring Communities Kenilworth, Wilmette, Northfield, Glencoe.

Opportunities to work with these landowners on easements, acquisitions, or donations will be important in creating a cohesive and continuous bikeway network in the future.

Cook County Forest Preserve District, located on the Western edge of the Village.

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 11 BUSINESS/METRA CONNECTIONS

/ M Metra Station

GLENCOE Business District

Hubbard Woods Metra Station / Green Bay Trail Connection Green Bay Trail Existing Park

M School

B Golf Course U T S I C I N R Forest Preserve E S S D I S T TOWER RD / Scale 1”=1,500’ N 0 750’ 1,500’

GREEN BAY RD

HIBBARD RD Elm Street Metra Station /

NORTHFIELD ELM ST MAPLE ST Indian Hill Metra Station

FORESTWAY DR SHERIDAN RD B M U T S I C I N R E S S D I S T GLENDALE AVE WILLOW RD /

HILL RD

M WINNETKA AVE WINNETKA AVE B U T S I C I N R E S S D I S T

GREEN/ BAY RD WILMETTE KENILWORTH

12 BUSINESS DISTRICTS / METRA CONNECTIONS The Village of Winnetka has the distinct advantage of having three main business districts, with a Metra station that serves each location. This development can be attributed to the 1921 Plan that placed the railroad stations at the center of the commercial centers, resulting in smaller business areas that can be conveniently accessed by nearby residents.

According to the Winnetka 2020 Comprehensive Plan, 91% of respondents shop regularly in at least one of the Village’s three business districts. This unique situation allows a majority of village residents the ability to walk to the nearest business district or Metra Hubbard Woods Business District, a popular spot for many residents of Winnetka. station. However, this ease of mobility for pedestrians is currently not associated with bicyclists looking to do the same. Providing this access would work to decrease automobile traffic, promote healthier lifestyles, and improve the local economy.

Through initial site analysis and discussions with residents it was clear that many problems exist when one tries to ride a bike from their home to a nearby business districts or Metra station. The following is a list of a few of the concerns with these key areas:

• A lack of sufficient, safe bicycle parking • The need for safe and established bicycle routes Village Hall, located in the heart of the Elm Street Business District • The need for directional signage to/from the Green Bay Trail

Another important goal identified by village leaders and business owners alike, was to establish bikeway routes to and from the Green Bay Trail. The ability to do so, provides the opportunity to capture regional users of the popular Green Bay Trail, thus providing a boost to the local economy.

Hubbard Woods Metra Station, one of three Metra stops within Winnetka

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 13 EXISTING BICYCLE LEVEL OF SERVICE (BLOS)

BLOS A BLOS B GLENCOE BLOS C BLOS D BLOS E BLOS F SCOTT AVE Lake Michigan Existing Park

GROVE ST VERNON AVE School ASBURY AVE Golf Course Forest Preserve

GAGE ST OLD GREEN RD BAY PINE TREE LN TOWER RD GORDON TERRACE Scale 1”=1,500’ N

PROSPECT AVE 0 750’ 1,500’ VINE ST FOXDALE AVE

WESTMOOR RD

GREEN BAY RD HIBBARD RD PINE STREET MAPLE ST

NORTHFIELD ELM STREET ST LINCOLN

FORESTWAY DR SHERIDAN RD OAK ST GLENDALE AVE ST LOCUST ASH ST

WILLOW RD POPLAR STREET FOREST ST LINDEN ST LOCUST RD BIRCH ST ELDER LN CHURCH RD SUNSET RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW WINNETKA AVE WINNETKA AVE HAPP RD

GREEN BAY RD WILMETTE KENILWORTH

14 BICYCLE LEVEL OF SERVICE The Bicycle Level of Service Map is a tool intended to quantify the BLOS D suitability and perceived comfort level for an on-road bicyclist on any Roadways with a BLOS D designation will experience moderate to roadway. high levels of motor vehicle traffic volumes and speed. Roadways with these scores are often only adequate for high-level, experienced BLOS input factors include: riders. Share the Road signage on these routes will improve conditions for these cyclists by increasing motorist awareness of bicycle traffic. • Traffic speed • Daily traffic volumes BLOS E • Surface conditions Roadways with a BLOS E designation will experience a high level • Right most lane width of interaction with vehicular traffic resulting in infrequent use by • Percentage of occupied parking bicyclists. • Total number of through lanes • Presence of on-road bike lanes or paved shoulders BLOS F Roadways with a BLOS F designation are roadways with high traffic Evaluation of each roadway results in a designated letter grade volumes, high traffic speeds, and often lack space for bicyclists. These ranking from “BLOS A” (best suited for bicyclists) to “BLOS F” (least roadways are often inadequate for any bicycle user and have major suited for bicyclists). Following is a short explanation of each level of safety issues. service rating. Existing BLOS BLOS A Roadways selected and analyzed within the study area produced Roadways with a BLOS A designation are generally safe and attractive a wide range of scores and results. After analyzing the results, there routes for all bicycles. These roadways have a low level of interaction were common characteristics associated with a majority of existing with motor vehicles, provide adequate space for bicyclists, and have roadways. low speed limits. This level of service is typically found throughout neighborhood streets. Most residential streets produced bike-friendly BLOS scores due to low traffic volumes and low posted speed limits. Certain segments BLOS B of roadways displayed BLOS scores of D, E, and F. These included Roadways with a BLOS B designation are typically safe for all bicyclists segments of Winnetka Avenue, Willow Road, and Tower Road. Typical and experience slightly higher traffic volumes. This level of service is characteristics of these roadways are higher high traffic counts, narrow typically found on local collector streets and residential roadways. road widths, and poor surface conditions.

BLOS C Future BLOS Roadways with a BLOS C designation will be adequate for most Taking into account the recommended improvements to on-street bicyclists, but some riders feel less comfortable. These roadways roadways and the addition of off-road bicycle routes, the implemented can expect moderate vehicular traffic and minor surface condition changes can increase the BLOS scores thus creating safer, more problems. attractive roadways for cyclists.

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 15 16 OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

17 18 OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES As with any comprehensive bikeway system, there are multiple Funding opportunities and challenges that merit discussion early and Opportunities: The Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan represents a prime throughout the planning process. The development of this bikeway example of a significant shift in approach toward transportation plan will provide the Park District and Village a resource in predicting planning. Such bikeway networks have been recognized as important future opportunities in order to plan for the current challenges that community assets for decades. As a result, cities, states, the federal exist. government, and private foundations have all developed programs that help fund the implementation of clear well-articulated visions. To realize the plan vision, there are three key areas that merit further For the Village of Winnetka this means there is ample opportunity for consideration. These are roadway and land improvements, funding, available outside funding. and branding. By developing strategies to overcome the challenges and advance the opportunities associated with this project, the Village Challenges: The primary challenge to the implementation of the will move toward realizing a grand and unique vision that will have Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan is a consistent effort to seek out and positive impacts for the community and the region. identify funding resources.

Roadway and Land Improvements Branding/Signage Opportunities: It is important to note that this plan is not a Opportunities: With the opportunistic positioning of two regional comprehensive village transportation plan, therefore special trails and three business/Metra districts the Village of Winnetka has provisions and park district awareness are critical to ensuring that the opportunity to attract a large group of outside visitors. Aside from bicycle accommodations are to be included in all future village signed bike routes the village has the opportunity to create a brand roadway projects. Working to coordinate and raise awareness of the image at key nodes of the bikeway plan. bikeway plan with the implementing agencies will benefit both the park district and the residents of the community. Challenges: To accomplish this, the Park District and Village must come to a consensus about the image Winnetka wishes to present. Challenges: A majority of the challenges that bicyclists encounter This can prove to be challenging, where interests and motivations are occur on IDOT owned roadways and bridges. The Village and Park often disparate and contradictory. District should actively engage in early and frequent dialogue with IDOT in order to ensure that bicycle friendly measures are incorporated in upcoming projects.

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 19 20 RECOMMENDATIONS

21 PROJECT VISION To encourage, promote, and establish a safe and convenient bicycle network that provides access to nearby neighborhoods, communities, businesses, parks, lakefront, and schools.

22 11 SCHOOLS 23 PARKS, LAKEFRONT, AND OPEN SPACE

2 3 REGIONAL TRAILS BUSINESS DISTRICTS

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 23 OLD GREEN BAY RD BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN HARBOR ST / 1st Priority Bike Network 2nd Priority Bike Network GLENCOE Other Potential Links Proposed Skokie Valley Trail Green Bay Trail (CCFPD) SCOTT AVE Lake Michigan Existing Park GROVE ST VERNON AVE School

ASBURY AVE M Golf Course MERRIL Forest Preserve EDGEWOOD LN

TOWER RD / GORDON TER M Metra Connection

PROSPECT AVE

VINE ST FOXDALE AVE No Biking Zone

WESTMOOR RD / Connection to Green Bay Trail GREEN BAY RD

Scale 1”=1,500’

HIBBARD RD N 0 750’ 1,500’ PINE STREET / MAPLE ST

NORTHFIELD ELM STREET ST LINCOLN

FORESTWAY DR SHERIDAN RD M OAK ST

CHERRY ST GLENDALE AVE LOCUST RD LOCUST ASH ST / WILLOW RD POPLAR ST

WILSON ST FOREST ST LINDEN ST LOCUST RD ELDER LN CHURCH RD SUNSET RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW WINNETKA AVE BIRCH ST M WINNETKA AVE

GREEN BAY RD ABBOTFORD RD ABBOTFORD

HAPP RD / WILMETTE KENILWORTH

24 OVERALL BIKEWAY NETWORK The Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan will work to create a bicycle network that is connected, safe, and attractive for all users with amenities that attract local and regional users. This chapter sets forth a list of bikeway development recommendations that includes: an overall bikeway network map, proposed roadway facility treatments, signage and wayfinding recommendations, and bicycle amenity suggestions.

The bikeway network described in this plan lays several strategies for improving the way bicycling is accommodated within the project study boundaries. The planned network builds upon the existing trails and planned improvements. It is important to note that in an attempt to create safe, continuous bicycle routes to high priority areas, some proposed routes extend beyond village boundaries with the vision of creating a bikeway plan that incorporates neighboring communities. These areas are included throughout the following maps.

The map to the left shows the recommended bicycle network map for the Village of Winnetka. It illustrates the majority of routes are for east- west connectivity with other spurs that focus on links to the Greenbay Trail, Forest Preserve District trail, and nearby schools. Most of these routes, as illustrated on plans on the proceeding pages, are signed routes. This is largely due to the tight and narrow nature of many of the Village roadways resulting in limited opportunities for providing new bike dedicated lanes. Many of the current roadway conditions are due in part to the 1921 Plan that ascribed to an 18 foot width for minor residential streets and a 36 foot width for thoroughfares. These characteristically narrow streets, which maximize parkway space, provide many challenges when looking to integrate on-street bikeway facilities. Many of the routes indicated as shared use lanes or separated multi-use lanes will require on street or right-of-way improvements to improve the condition and safety of that route for use (see the Bicycle Level of Service analysis on page 14), which should be further analyzed as each route is considered for implementation.

The Village of Winnetka and surrounding areas are filled with an abundance of opportunities and uses. As various phases of the bike network move toward implementation, revisiting the recommendations and bikeway plan in this document will provide direction as the network develops. WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 25 Typical Signed Route / traffic lane traffic lane Marked Signed Route

5’-6’ bike lane traffic lane traffic lane 5’-6’ bike lane Typical Designated Bike Lane

26 BIKEWAY FACILITY TREATMENTS

The following bicycle facility treatments introduce a few of the potential improvements that are recommended for the overall Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan. The plan includes a mixture of on-road and off-road trails to provide a network of bicycle routes to serve the Village of Winnetka.

Designation for each trail segment is based on the proposed use, existing condition, bicycle level of service factors, and potential easements, and will be further detailed within the implementation plan. http://blog.bicyclecoalition.org Example of a signed bike route Signed Route Signed routes represent on-road bicycle routes that are recognized by appropriate signage with no major roadway improvements needed. These routes are often established where there is not enough room or less of a need for dedicated bike lanes. These signs serve three primary functions: regulating bicycle usage, warning of unexpected conditions, and directing riders along established routes.

Generally, it is recommended that bike route signs always include destination, direction, and distance information. A set of standards for the implementation of bicycle signs is guided by the Manual of Uniform http://bikefriendlyarlington.com Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). While these standards provide an Example of marked lane essential tool for implementation it is necessary to coordinate sign placement with village policy and existing conditions.

Marked Lane A marked lane is often found in situations where it is appropriate to provide a higher level of guidance to both bicyclists and motorists alike. Shared lane markings, often coined “sharrows”, are pavement markings designed to help bicyclists position themselves within the roadway, and to alert vehicular motorists to the presence of cyclists on the roadway. These markings are often appropriate along roadways with insufficient width to accommodate a bike lane. http://richmondva.wordpress.com Example of a striped bike lane

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 27 Typical Multi-Use Trail

8’ multi-use trail parkway traffic lane traffic lane Typical Separated Multi-Use Trail

28 Bike Lane A bike lane is a portion of the roadway designed for bicycle use. Bike lanes are typically 5’ wide on each side of the road and include a solid white stripe with recommended signage, and pavement markings. This bicycle facility provides cyclists dedicated road space that is adjacent to but separated from vehicular traffic.

Where roadway width permits, bike lanes are the recommended and preferred bicycle facility for thoroughfares in both urban and suburban areas. A rendering of a typical bike lane section can be seen on the previous page. Existing photo of the North Branch Trail crossing at Tower Road and Forestway Drive Shared-Use Trail A shared-use trail is an off-road facility separated from motor vehicle traffic, except at road crossings. These trails accommodate a wide variety of users including bicyclists, pedestrians, wheelchairs, and others. These trails, often located away from roadways, are a popular choice among users.

The nearby Green Bay Trail and North Branch Trail are two excellent examples of shared-use trails and the recreational benefits that they exemplify.

Separated Shared-Use Trail A separated shared-use trail is an off-road facility that runs parallel to Example of separated multi-use trail a roadway, separated by a parkway. Often separated shared-use trails are an appropriate facility on busier roads, with limited access, and well designed intersections.

The figure to the left illustrates the separation of the trail from the roadway which results in a safer experience for the cyclists.

A pedestrian bridge links International Friendship Gardens across Trail Creek.

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 29 OTHER POTENTIAL LINKS OLD GREEN BAY RD HARBOR ST BIKE NETWORK / North Branch Trail Connection First and Second Priority Links Signed Bike Route GLENCOE Shared-Use Lane (Sharrow) Hubbard Woods Metra Station Separated Shared-Use Trail Shared-Use Trail Green Bay Trail Connection Proposed Skokie Valley Trail SCOTT AVE Lake Michigan Existing Regional Trail GROVE ST VERNON AVE Existing Park

ASBURY AVE M School MERRIL Golf Course EDGEWOOD LN Forest Preserve TOWER RD / GORDON TER / Improved Green Bay Trail Access

PROSPECT AVE Scale 1”=1,500’ N VINE ST FOXDALE AVE 0 750’ 1,500’

WESTMOOR RD Sheridan Road & Tower Road GREEN BAY RD

Green Bay Trail Connection HIBBARD RD PINE STREET / Elm Street Metra Station MAPLE ST

NORTHFIELD ELM STREET ST LINCOLN

FORESTWAY DR SHERIDAN RD Sheridan Road & Elm Street M OAK ST

CHERRY ST Green Bay Trail Connection GLENDALE AVE LOCUST RD LOCUST ASH ST

/ Indian Hill Metra Station WILLOW RD POPLAR ST

Skokie Playfields WILSON ST FOREST ST LINDEN ST LOCUST RD ELDER LN CHURCH RD North Branch Trail Connection SUNSET RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW WINNETKA AVE BIRCH ST M WINNETKA AVE

GREEN BAY RD ABBOTFORD RD ABBOTFORD

HAPP RD / WILMETTE KENILWORTH

30 SIGNAGE The introduction of signed bicycle routes throughout the village will serve as a significant and important first step in establishing the Winnetka Bikeway Network. Signing of bikeway routes must adhere to uniform and consistent standards in order to command respect from the public. This uniformity is guided by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and is the recommended standard for implementation.

In general, well-designed roadways often make it clear for users how to proceed, and require little signage. Contrary to this are many of the planned signed routes throughout the Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan. Therefore following the MUTCD standards will be essential for the safety of the bicyclists while also providing the added benefit of alerting motor vehicles to the presence of bicyclists on the roadway.

WAYFINDING Adequate wayfinding will serve as an important function to the implementation of the Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan. Within the initial research and analysis conducted, one major objective identified was the desire for signage that connected the various key destination points throughout the village. The accompanying map illustrates proposed locations for bikeway navigational maps that will help direct http://raleigh-consult.limehouse.com visitors to the many trails, parks, schools, and business districts found throughout the area.

Bikeway navigational maps should be provided with an aesthetically pleasing consistent theme that is obvious enough to be noticed, but does not overwhelm the natural setting. Although signage and wayfinding may seem somewhat simple, careful thought and design should be applied to this element of the overall project. The tone, appearance, and locations of these signs will help to define the “brand” of Winnetka and its open space destinations.

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 31 32 BICYCLE AMENITY IMPROVEMENTS With the development of the Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan and the expected increase in bicycle users as a result, it is critical to adapt and accommodate existing spaces to promote the bikeway network.

Through initial site inventory and comments received from the public, it was clearly illustrated that the need for adequate bicycle parking is not being met in the following areas of Winnetka.

• Hubbard Woods Metra/Business District

• Elm Street Metra/Business District http://soundwalk.org/2011/ • Indian Hill Metra/Business District Conversion of Vehicular Parking Stall into Bicycle Parking • Majority of parks • Local Schools

While many areas throughout the village lack adequate bike parking, the three areas of highest priority for improvements include the three business districts. These areas provide the greatest benefit to increasing bicycle amenities. Like drivers, bicyclists are potential customers, and businesses should be encouraged to incorporate bicycle parking into their infrastructure to better serve the residents of Winnetka. http://www.google.com/imgres?q=bicycle+lockers Additional bike parking should also be a high priority at all three Metra Typical Bicycle Lockers stations found throughout the village. These areas are in need of an increase in bicycle parking and an update in existing bicycle parking racks. Increased bicycle parking in these areas will take pressure off the already over-crowded automobile parking spaces and will make it more likely for residents to use their bike if adequate parking is available.

As the images to the right indicate, bicycle parking comes in many shapes and styles, but should follow a set of standards that allow for the safe and effective storage of bicycles.

Typical Inverted U Bicycle Rack

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 33 34 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

35 36 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY The realization of the goals and objectives outlined by the Park departments and commissions through strategic memorandums District, Village, and the residents of Winnetka will require a prioritized of understanding, has been successful elsewhere in expediting the implementation strategy. It is important to note that this plan is not a development of larger scale park projects, particularly for projects like village transportation plan, but rather a bicycle master plan outlining the Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan where quality of life and educational specific action items in order to create a unified and safe bicycle opportunities abound. network throughout the Village of Winnetka. IDOT Funding: To assist with the overall project build out, an implementation strategy The ownership of various roadways and bridges throughout the was developed for each phase of the project. This strategy phases the village allows for the opportunity to incorporate bicycle facilities with project over a period of years, which will accommodate enhancement IDOT programmed projects. This is likely to create fragmented bicycle and development of the bikeway plan as funding and community facilities until the remaining portions of the bikeway are constructed. interest allows. Because project funding is a particularly sensitive and This is unavoidable yet adequate, as long as suitable transitions are difficult subject, a funding strategy has been outlined to assist current put in place. and future community leaders for the development of this project. Grant Funding: Each priority level provides the following network details: Any strategy selected should include an aggressive grant writing • Location of improvements campaign. The redevelopments and enhancements outlined in this • Facility type document are well-positioned for a variety of funding sources. Many • Coordinating agency near term grant opportunities have been included in the attached • Estimated cost funding matrix, see appendix A.

Funding Strategy Philanthropic Funding: Project funding consists of two primary elements, bikeway Philanthropists who wish to leave a legacy have often been sought development costs and policy and programming costs. The Winnetka after to finance substantial community projects. In many cases, these Bikeway Master Plan factors in a prioritized phasing plan. Each individuals, groups, or corporate foundations have funded quite priority level is designed to build upon the previous phases with the impressive projects and should be considered a resource. Although ultimate goal of achieving the greater vision of the bikeway network. not as common in bikeway implementation, philanthropic funding of Development strategies are described in more detail below. major parks has been a vital component of parks across the country.

Winnetka Park District Funding: The Winnetka Park District will need to collaborate with other agencies to determine funding sources and responsibilities as the plan is implemented. This may be done in a series of substantial initiatives, or over a period of years, which is the most likely scenario. Should this route be taken, a disciplined approach that integrates development costs into appropriate budget projections would be most helpful. A more likely scenario, sharing this financial burden across municipal

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 37 OLD GREEN BAY RD FIRST PRIORITY BIKE NETWORK / Signed Bike Route Shared-Use Lane (Sharrow) GLENCOE Separated Shared-Use Trail Shared-Use Trail Proposed Skokie Valley Trail

SCOTT AVE Existing Regional Trail Lake Michigan Existing Park School

ASBURY AVE M Golf Course Forest Preserve

PINE TREE LN Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge GAGE ST / TOWER RD GORDON TER

Scale 1”=1,500’ VINE ST N FOXDALE AVE 0 750’ 1,500’

WESTMOOR RD GREEN BAY RD HIBBARD RD PINE ST /

FORESTWAY DR LINCOLN AVE LINCOLN NORTHFIELD ELM ST MAPLE ST

SHERIDAN RD M

OAK ST LOCUST ST LOCUST BERKELEY AVE GLENDALE AVE ASH ST / WILLOW RD LINDEN ST

SUNSET RD

CHURCH RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW

M WOODLAND AVE WINNETKA AVE WINNETKA AVE

GREEN/ BAY RD HAPP RD WILMETTE KENILWORTH

38 FIRST PRIORITY NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Project Description Coordinating Agency

Signed Bike Routes Village • Elm Street

Separated Shared-Use Trails Village/Park District • Hibbard Road

Bike Shared Use Lane with Sharrow Striping IDOT • Sheridan Road

Trailhead Signage Park District Bikeway Bikeway • provide signage to and from Green Bay Trail Development • provide signage to and from CCFPD trails • provide navigational bikeway signage Bicycle Parking Park District • additional bike racks to be located at all three Metra stations Village • additional bike racks to be located at Green Bay Trail access points Local Schools • bike racks to be located at key destinations along bikeway plan • bike racks to be located at all three business districts • bike racks to be located at various schools

Safe Routes to School Village Local Schools Bike Ambassadors Program Park District • program to promote safety and raise awareness for all road users Police

Policy & Policy Bicycle Parking Policy Village

Programming • if adopted policy would could require bicycle parking at all retail, commercial, and multi-family zoned properties

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 39 OLD GREEN BAY RD SECOND PRIORITY BIKE NETWORK / First Priority Links Signed Bike Route GLENCOE Shared-Use Lane (Sharrow) Separated Shared-Use Trail Shared-Use Trail

SCOTT AVE Proposed Skokie Valley Trail Lake Michigan Existing Regional Trail Existing Park

ASBURY AVE M School Golf Course Forest Preserve PINE TREE LN GAGE ST / TOWER RD GORDON TER / Improved Green Bay Trail Access Intersection Improvements

VINE ST FOXDALE AVE Scale 1”=1,500’ WESTMOOR RD N GREEN BAY RD 0 750’ 1,500’ HIBBARD RD PINE ST /

FORESTWAY DR LINCOLN AVE LINCOLN NORTHFIELD ELM ST MAPLE ST

SHERIDAN RD M

OAK ST LOCUST ST LOCUST BERKELEY AVE GLENDALE AVE ASH ST / WILLOW RD LINDEN ST

SUNSET RD

CHURCH RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW

M WOODLAND AVE WINNETKA AVE WINNETKA AVE

GREEN/ BAY RD HAPP RD WILMETTE KENILWORTH

40 SECOND PRIORITY NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Project Description Coordinating Agency

Signed Bike Routes Village • Linden Street • Maple Street • Lincoln Street Shared Lane Markings Village • Tower Road (requires additional analysis of road conditions and potential widening) Separated Shared-Use Trail Village • Willow Road (concrete walk widening) IDOT • Winnetka Avenue (concrete walk widening) & Bridge Cook County Forest Preserve Improvements District (CCFPD) • Tower Road (concrete walk widening) • Happ Road (concrete walk widening) • Forest Way Drive (new off trail in right-of-way or CCFPD property)

Bikeway Bikeway Shared-Use Trail Park District

Development • Golf course and CCFPD trail connection • CCFPD gravel travel paved improvements • CCFPD pedestrian bridge improvements and addition Additional Bike Parking Park District • additional bike racks to be located throughout park system Village Local Schools Improved Green Bay Trail access points Village (ADA accessibility, additional bicycle infrastructure) Park District • Old Green Bay Road and Tower Road connection • Pine Street connection Street Design Guidelines Village • adoption of bicycle friendly design standards for all future roadway improvements

Complete Streets Policy Village Policy & Policy Programming

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 41 OLD GREEN BAY RD OTHER POTENTIAL LINKS BIKE NETWORK / First and Second Priority Links Signed Bike Route GLENCOE Shared-Use Lane (Sharrow) Separated Shared-Use Trail Shared-Use Trail

SCOTT AVE Proposed Skokie Valley Trail Lake Michigan Existing Regional Trail Existing Park

ASBURY AVE M School Golf Course Forest Preserve PINE TREE LN GAGE ST / TOWER RD GORDON TERRACE / Improved Green Bay Trail Access Scale 1”=1,500’ VINE ST N FOXDALE AVE 0 750’ 1,500’

WESTMOOR RD GREEN BAY RD HIBBARD RD PINE ST /

FORESTWAY DR LINCOLN AVE LINCOLN NORTHFIELD ELM ST MAPLE ST

SHERIDAN RD M

OAK ST LOCUST ST LOCUST BERKELEY AVE GLENDALE AVE ASH ST / WILLOW RD LINDEN ST

SUNSET RD CHURCH RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW

M WOODLAND AVE WINNETKA AVE WINNETKA AVE

GREEN/ BAY RD HAPP RD WILMETTE KENILWORTH

42 WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 43 44 APPENDIX A: FUNDING MATRIX

45 APPENDIX A FUNDING MATRIX

This list is intended to provide a number of available resources to fund portions of the Winnetka Bikeway Network as the project progresses toward and into implementation. Because grant funding is dynamic and funders have variable resources, this list should be updated regularly. Funding Funding Source Grant Description Amount IDNR Illinois Bicycle Path 50% Max. Created in 1990 to financially assist eligible units of government to acquire, construct, and Program rehabilitate public, non-motorized bicycle paths and directly related support facilities. Bicycle path development or renovation including site clearing, grading, drainage, surfacing, bridging, fencing, signage, and support features.

Federal Highway Recreation Trails 80% Max. Program supports the following programs: trail construction, trail rehabilitation, Administration Program (IDNR) restoration of areas adjacent to trails, trail head parking, restrooms, rest areas, and signage.

IDOT Illinois Transportation 80% Max. Program provides funding for community based projects that expand travel choices and Enhancement enhance the transportation experience by improving the cultural, historic, aesthetic and Program (ITEP) environmental aspects of our transportation infrastructure

IDOT Congestion Mitigation 80% Max. Provides funding to communities and agencies for projects that will lead to quantifiable and Air Quality reductions in auto emissions and/or traffic congestion. Improvement (CMAQ)

IDOT Safe Routes to School 100% Max. Program supports projects and programs that enable and encourage walking and bicycling to and from school. The program applies to all bike/pedestrian infrastructure within a two-mile radius of a K-8 school.

North Shore Council of Surface 70% Max. Program to fund local road and transit projects. Program encourages projects aimed at Mayors Transportation Plan reducing automobile trips and emissions. Eligible projects include all bike and pedestrian infrastructure improvements.

46 APPENDIX A: FUNDING MATRIX Funding Funding Source Grant Description Amount MOTOR FUEL TAX N/A 100% State Use of funds limited to MUTCD standard signing and roadway striping. Projects must (MFT) compete with other roadway needs in village.

VILLAGE GENERAL N/A 100% Local No restrictions. Improvements will compete with all other village funding requirements. FUNDS

PARK DISTRICT N/A 100% Local No restrictions. Improvements will compete with all other park district funding GENERAL FUNDS requirements.

More than likely, a combination of these funding sources will be necessary to realize the vision of the Winnetka Bikeway Master Plan. Being creative, deliberate, and disciplined is the key to capitalizing on these opportunities. Leveraging spending with grant opportunities and maintaining the vision through periodic public meetings and regular success, no matter how small, will help to cultivate project momentum and transform Winnetka into a bicycle friendly community.

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 47 48 APPENDIX B: COMMUNITY BICYCLE NETWORK MAPS

49 50 APPENDIX B: COMMUNITY BICYCLE NETWORK MAPS Bike Winnetka

1

2

Suitable Places to Stop and Exit the Ride

1. Hubbard Woods School (Chatfield Rd. & Vine St.) WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 2. Village Green Park (Elm St. & Maple St.) 3. Indian Hill Park (Wilson St. & Winnetka Ave.) 3 51 52 APPENDIX C: EAST–WEST CONNECTOR TRAIL OPTIONS

53 54 APPENDIX C: EAST-WEST CONNECTOR TRAIL OPTIONS Potential Future Connection

Option B

Option A

Option C (Park District Improvements)

Material Legend

Asphalt Path Option C (Village Improvements) Stone Path

100'50' 300' ISSUE DATE: JUNE 16, 2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 04-0972-002-01-02 All drawings are preliminary and subject to change ©2011 Hitchcock Design Group

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 55 56 APPENDIX D: PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS

57 58 APPENDIX D: PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 59 60 APPENDIX D: PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 61 62 APPENDIX D: PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 63 64 APPENDIX D: PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 65 GLENCOE OTHER POTENTIAL LINKS BIKE NETWORK ENLARGEMENT First and Second Priority Links Signed Bike Route Shared-Use Lane (Sharrow) Separated Shared-Use Trail Shared-Use Trail Lake Michigan Proposed Skokie Valley Trail Existing Regional Trail SCOTT AVE Existing Park School Golf Course Forest Preserve / Improved Green Bay Trail Access Scale 1”=500’ N 0 250’ 500’

M GORDON TERRACE

GAGE ST / TOWER RD TOWER RD

FOXDALE AVE

GREEN BAY RD VINE ST

Revised Draft 07/30/2015 66

68 APPENDIX E: 2012 Maps

69 OLD GREEN BAY RD BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN HARBOR ST / 1st Priority Bike Network 2nd Priority Bike Network GLENCOE Other Potential Links Proposed Skokie Valley Trail Green Bay Trail North Branch Trail (CCFPD) SCOTT AVE Lake Michigan Existing Park GROVE ST VERNON AVE School

ASBURY AVE M Golf Course MERRIL Forest Preserve EDGEWOOD LN

TOWER RD / GORDON TER M Metra Connection

PROSPECT AVE

VINE ST FOXDALE AVE No Biking Zone

WESTMOOR RD / Connection to Green Bay Trail GREEN BAY RD

Scale 1”=1,500’

HIBBARD RD N 0 750’ 1,500’ PINE STREET / MAPLE ST

NORTHFIELD ELM STREET ST LINCOLN

FORESTWAY DR SHERIDAN RD M OAK ST

CHERRY ST GLENDALE AVE LOCUST RD LOCUST ASH ST / WILLOW RD POPLAR ST

WILSON ST FOREST ST LINDEN ST LOCUST RD ELDER LN CHURCH RD SUNSET RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW WINNETKA AVE BIRCH ST M WINNETKA AVE

GREEN BAY RD ABBOTFORD RD ABBOTFORD

HAPP RD / WILMETTE KENILWORTH

70 OLD GREEN BAY RD NAVIGATIONAL WAYFINDING NODES North Branch Trail Connection Proposed Wayfinding Locations Proposed Bikeway Routes GLENCOE Green Bay Trail Hubbard Woods Metra Station North Branch Trail (CCFPD) Existing Park Green Bay Trail Connection School SCOTT AVE Golf Course Forest Preserve Lake Michigan ASBURY AVE Scale 1”=1,500’ MERRIL N EDGEWOOD LN 0 750’ 1,500’

TOWER RD GORDON TER

FOXDALE AVE Sheridan Road & Tower Road WESTMOOR RD

GREEN BAY RD Green Bay Trail Connection HIBBARD RD Elm Street Metra Station

ELM ST MAPLE ST NORTHFIELD ST LINCOLN FORESTWAY DR SHERIDAN RD Sheridan Road & Elm Street OAK ST Green Bay Trail Connection GLENDALE AVE LOCUST RD LOCUST ASH ST

WILLOW RD Indian Hill Metra Station Skokie Playfields FOREST ST LINDEN ST

North Branch Trail Connection BIRCH ST

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW WINNETKA AVE WINNETKA AVE

GREEN BAY RD HAPP RD WILMETTE KENILWORTH

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 71 PHASE ONE OLD GREEN BAY RD HARBOR ST BIKE NETWORK Signed Bike Route Bike Lane GLENCOE Proposed Skokie Valley Trail Existing Regional Trail Existing Park School SCOTT AVE Lake Michigan Golf Course GROVE ST VERNON AVE Forest Preserve ASBURY AVE MERRIL Scale 1”=1,500’ EDGEWOOD LN N 0 750’ 1,500’ TOWER RD GORDON TER

PROSPECT AVE

VINE ST FOXDALE AVE

WESTMOOR RD

GREEN BAY RD HIBBARD RD PINE STREET MAPLE ST

NORTHFIELD ELM STREET ST LINCOLN

FORESTWAY DR SHERIDAN RD

OAK ST

CHERRY ST GLENDALE AVE LOCUST RD LOCUST ASH ST

WILLOW RD POPLAR ST

WILSON ST FOREST ST LINDEN ST LOCUST RD ELDER LN CHURCH RD SUNSET RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW WINNETKA AVE BIRCH ST WINNETKA AVE

GREEN BAY RD ABBOTFORD RD ABBOTFORD HAPP RD WILMETTE KENILWORTH

72 PHASE TWO OLD GREEN BAY RD HARBOR ST BIKE NETWORK Phase One Improvements Separated Shared-Use Trail GLENCOE Shared Use Trail Proposed Skokie Valley Trail Existing Regional Trail Existing Park SCOTT AVE Lake Michigan School GROVE ST VERNON AVE Golf Course ASBURY AVE Forest Preserve MERRIL Improved Green Bay Trail Access EDGEWOOD LN /

TOWER RD GORDON TER / Scale 1”=1,500’ N

PROSPECT AVE 0 750’ 1,500’

VINE ST FOXDALE AVE

WESTMOOR RD

GREEN BAY RD HIBBARD RD PINE STREET / MAPLE ST

NORTHFIELD ELM STREET ST LINCOLN

FORESTWAY DR SHERIDAN RD

OAK ST

CHERRY ST GLENDALE AVE LOCUST RD LOCUST ASH ST

WILLOW RD POPLAR ST

WILSON ST FOREST ST LINDEN ST LOCUST RD ELDER LN CHURCH RD SUNSET RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW WINNETKA AVE BIRCH ST WINNETKA AVE

GREEN BAY RD ABBOTFORD RD ABBOTFORD HAPP RD WILMETTE KENILWORTH

WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 73 OLD GREEN BAY RD PHASE THREE BIKE NETWORK Phase One Improvements GLENCOE Separated Shared-Use Trail Shared Use Trail Proposed Skokie Valley Trail Existing Regional Trail

SCOTT AVE Lake Michigan Existing Park School Golf Course ASBURY AVE Forest Preserve Intersection Improvements

PINE TREE LN GAGE ST Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge

TOWER RD GORDON TERRACE

Scale 1”=1,500’ VINE ST N FOXDALE AVE 0 750’ 1,500’

WESTMOOR RD GREEN BAY RD HIBBARD RD PINE ST

FORESTWAY DR LINCOLN AVE LINCOLN NORTHFIELD ELM ST MAPLE ST

SHERIDAN RD

OAK ST LOCUST ST LOCUST BERKELEY AVE GLENDALE AVE ASH ST

WILLOW RD LINDEN ST

SUNSET RD CHURCH RD

HILL RD WESTVIEW APPLE TREE BROADMEADOW WOODLAND AVE WINNETKA AVE WINNETKA AVE

GREEN BAY RD

HAPP RD WILMETTE KENILWORTH

Revised Draft 07/23/2015 74 APPENDIX F OTHER COMMUNITY SURVEY RESPONSES

75 76

APPENDIX D:PUBLICMEETING COMMENTS

Memorandum

Date: October 12, 2015

To: Bob Smith, Winnetka Park District From: Steve Konters/Bridget Safferman, Hitchcock Design Group

RE: Bikeway Master Plan Amendment – Surrounding Community Phone Calls

Hitchcock Design Group reached out to nearby communities to obtain information on their bike networks. Below is a summary of information provided by those communities who responded on based on the stated questions.

Village of Deerfield (email response)

Jeff Ryckaert, AICP Principal Planner 847-719-7482 [email protected]

1. Does your community have a bikeway network and is there a documented map? a. “Yes, it is part of the Comprehensive Plan which is available on the Village’s website. See pages 40 – 42. The bicycle map is also available for residents on the Village’s website under the GIS maps.”

2. What type of bike trails do you have (off road paths, multi-use paths, designated bike lanes, shared use lanes, designated routes by signage only)? a. “Deerfield mostly has routes, but a couple of small bike paths at the north end on town that is mostly out of the Village boundaries except for the High School property. Also, on the west end of town is a bike path. Attached are a couple of articles about these 2 areas.”

3. Does your community have a bikeway master plan or other planning document that was developed to help guide the implementation of your bikeway network? a. “The Comprehensive Plan. The projects are added to the budget in the capital improvement projects if there is funding available.”

4. Has the community generally supported the development of bike trails and bike routes? a. “Yes, the Village believes that bike and pedestrian amenities improve the quality of life and street safety, increase physical activity, and reduce carbon emissions. Biking is a growing transportation trend and is a healthy, inexpensive way of transportation. There is a growing interest in bikes for recreation.”

5. Have there been any concerns or issues residents have expressed? a. “Little to none. Once in a while I’ll get a request for bike lines on Deerfield Road, but of course the roadway isn’t wide enough to accommodate this request. However, as part of the Deerfield Road reconstruction project (2016) there is a possibility that road might have sharrows put in.”

J:\Projects\Alpha\Winnetka Park District\Bikeway Plan Amendment\02 Communications\HDG\community bike information\memo 20151012 phone calls.docx

Page 2

6. Have you seen an increase in use and bike riding following the implementation of bike trails and/or routes? a. “That’s hard to quantify, but I believe there has been an increase especially by families on the weekends. Also, the tunnel beneath the Metra tracks (see attached article explaining this project) has seen an increase, especially on the weekends.”

7. Have you seen any increase in accidents between bicyclists and motorists? a. “I do not believe there has been an increase to any great degree. I have asked the Chief of Police “ b. Police Response: 2015 = 5, 2013 = 7, 2014 = 8 (reported accidents/year)

8. Any other benefits you have seen in your community or comments you have related to your bikeway network? a. “While it is hard to quantify if there is more people using the bike paths, it does complete the network and completes the big picture goal of having the network in place. One benefit that may or may not be related is the incorporation of bike storage in large developments and the implementation of having that as a part of a checklist for developers when they are building their projects. Having a place to put your bike is key. Another thought is that it provides access to the larger network and for serious bikers or the weekend warrior it provides alternatives for exercise and transportation right from their front door.”

Village of Glenview (phone response) 847-724-1700

1. Does your community have a bikeway network and is there a documented map? a. Yes b. Yes

2. What type of bike trails do you have (off road paths, multi-use paths, designated bike lanes, shared use lanes, designated routes by signage only)? a. Designated Bike Lanes b. Designated Routes by Signage Only

3. Does your community have a bikeway master plan or other planning document that was developed to help guide the implementation of your bikeway network? a. Yes, the plan was developed in 2007 and is currently being updated

4. Has the community generally supported the development of bike trails and bike routes? a. Yes, supported at the comprehensive plan level and expanded from there WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 5. Have there been any concerns or issues residents have expressed? a. Unknown b. There is resident demand for forest preserve connections

6. Have you seen an increase in use and bike riding following the implementation of bike trails and/or routes? a. Yes. They have also seen an increase in the number and membership of biking groups and have seen several new bike shops open

77 78 APPENDIX D:PUBLICMEETING COMMENTS

Page 3

7. Have you seen any increase in accidents between bicyclists and motorists? a. No (Based on police reports)

8. Any other benefits you have seen in your community or comments you have related to your bikeway network? a. Cross-connectivity is highly supported/demanded b. Some connections with Morton Grove have/are being established c. Recently awarded the Bicycle Friendly Community Award Bronze Level (2015) Village of Northbrook (email response) Jim Baxa Staff Liaison 847-272-4711 [email protected]

1. Does your community have a bikeway network and is there a documented map? a. “Yes, http://www.northbrook.il.us/index.aspx?page=254“ b. “Yes, http://www.northbrook.il.us/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=92 8 “ 2. What type of bike trails do you have (off road paths, multi-use paths, designated bike lanes, shared use lanes, designated routes by signage only)? a. “The majority of our bike routes are on the street without pavement markings or symbols; three streets have “Sharrow” pavement markings and two with designated “Bike Lanes””

3. Does your community have a bikeway master plan or other planning document that was developed to help guide the implementation of your bikeway network? a. Yes b. “See the Bike Plan on the web link above”

4. Has the community generally supported the development of bike trails and bike routes? a. “Yes, the Northbrook Park District performed a general survey among Village residents and they have mentioned more bike trails/routes was one of the more requested amenities to provide.”

5. Have there been any concerns or issues residents have expressed? a. “As with a majority of the cycling community; driving behavioral habits of motorist is a significant concern.”

6. Have you seen an increase in use and bike riding following the implementation of bike trails and/or routes? a. “I would say no; however I believe the overall use cycling has increased within the Village”

7. Have you seen any increase in accidents between bicyclists and motorists? a. “I have no data to support this; sorry.”

8. Any other benefits you have seen in your community or comments you have related to your bikeway network?

Page 4

a. “The most requested comments include, more designated bike routes to be marked, additional bicycle parking at the Metra commuter station and additional bike racks to be installed in the downtown area of the Village.”

Village of Skokie (phone response) Carrie Haberstich Planner 847-673-0500

1. Does your community have a bikeway network and is there a documented map? a. Yes b. Yes

2. What type of bike trails do you have (off road paths, multi-use paths, designated bike lanes, shared use lanes, designated routes by signage only)? a. Off-road paths b. Multi-use paths c. Designated bike lanes d. Shared use lanes e. Designated routes by signage only

3. Does your community have a bikeway master plan or other planning document that was developed to help guide the implementation of your bikeway network? a. Yes (created 2003)

4. Has the community generally supported the development of bike trails and bike routes? a. Yes, positive feedback received during and after route construction

5. Have there been any concerns or issues residents have expressed? a. Proximity of route to townhomes raised stormwater management concerns which were addressed during construction b. Received several comments asking about the function/necessity of green paint for bike lanes on the road

6. Have you seen an increase in use and bike riding following the implementation of bike trails and/or routes? a. Yes, some routes were in use before officially being opened (prior striping, signage, WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN etc)

7. Have you seen any increase in accidents between bicyclists and motorists? a. Unknown (likely no)

8. Any other benefits you have seen in your community or comments you have related to your bikeway network? a. Receive strong support from the village health department director.

79 80 APPENDIX D:PUBLICMEETING COMMENTS

Page 5

b. Implementing a complete streets policy in March 2016 which will provide extra leverage for bike improvements c. Finalists in “Access to Transit” grant program through the RTA to build more bike parking at the train station d. Working with several communities including Glencoe, Northbrook, Wilmette to expand regional bike trails and apply for grant funding

Village of Wilmette (phone response) Jorge Cruz Assistant Village Engineer 847-853-7623

1. Does your community have a bikeway network and is there a documented map? a. Yes b. Yes

2. What type of bike trails do you have (off road paths, multi-use paths, designated bike lanes, shared use lanes, designated routes by signage only)? a. Designated by signage b. Dedicated c. Multi-use (one)

3. Does your community have a bikeway master plan or other planning document that was developed to help guide the implementation of your bikeway network? a. No, Used to have a Bicycle Task force which was absorbed by the Environmental Task Force b. Bicycle improvements are incorporated into appropriate public works projects when the budget allows

4. Has the community generally supported the development of bike trails and bike routes? a. Yes

5. Have there been any concerns or issues residents have expressed? a. No, some concern over safety was largely mitigated by pre-existing designated routes around the schools for less experienced riders

6. Have you seen an increase in use and bike riding following the implementation of bike trails and/or routes? a. No, Bike ridership was always high but where they are available people are now using the amenities instead of the streets and sidewalks b. Secured bike storage (sheltered with lights) is highly used

7. Have you seen any increase in accidents between bicyclists and motorists? a. Unknown

8. Any other benefits you have seen in your community or comments you have related to your bikeway network? a. Bicycling is very popular in the community

Page 6

b. Can be hard to implement new bicycle improvements because they are trying to incorporate them into other projects

The following communities were contacted but did not respond: 1. Highland Park 847-926-1196 2. City of Evanston 847-448-4311

cc: File, HDG WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN

81

82 APPENDIX D: PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS APPENDIX G COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES

83 84

MINUTES WINNETKA VILLAGE COUNCIL RESCHEDULED STUDY SESSION April 11, 2013 (Approved: May 7,2013) A record of a legally convened meeting of the Council of the Village of Winnetka, which was held in the Village Hall Council Chambers on Thursday, April 11, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. 1) Call to Order. President Tucker called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Trustees Jack Buck, Patrick Corrigan, Richard Kates, Stuart McCrary and Jennifer Spinney. Absent: Trustee Arthur Braun. Also in attendance: Village Manager Robert Bahan, Village Attorney Katherine Janega, Public Works Director Steven Saunders, Police Chief Patrick Kreis, Assistant to the Village Manager Megan Pierce, and approximately 17 persons in the audience. 2) Winnetka Park District – Bikeway Master Plan. Village Public Works Director Steven Saunders reviewed the Winnetka Park District’s process to develop a bikeway master plan. He explained the plan identifies both on- and off- road bike routes to better link the lakefront and recreation facilities with the Village’s downtown and key community destinations. The Park District conducted an extensive engagement process, including a Task Force and Open Houses with the public. Mr. Saunders noted that the Master Plan was presented to the Village’s Plan Commission in June, 2012, and since, the Plan has been revised based on public comment received. Dr. Terry Schwartz, Executive Director of the Winnetka Park District, introduced Steve Connors, of Hitchcock Design Group, to present the Plan. He stated that Winnetka may be lagging behind neighboring communities which already have bicycle plans and facilities in place and that the most recent Winnetka Caucus survey showed support for a bikeway plan. Mr. Connors said the Bikeway Master Plan is focused on the Park District’s boundaries, which extend beyond the Village’s borders in some instances, and therefore will require coordination with outside organization. The Plan seeks to create links for bicycle riders in the communities by looking at land holdings and destinations. He described cycling as a rising trend, because it is a more sustainable, environmental way to move that also reduces traffic and congestion. The Plan takes the different roads within the Village and their level of service into consideration, as it is necessary to accommodate diverse types of users. Mr. Connors also gave an overview of the public meeting process and some of the feedback received. Comments from the public focused on significant plan elements such as: need for strong and safer east/west connections, improved signage, lack of bicycle amenities, concern about residential disruption, and desire for public education. Though the original Plan called for increasing internal roadway links in the community that analysis showed would improve travel, Mr. Connors said public concerns have helped the Park District to revise its recommendations. The Bikeway Master Plan proposes three priority levels for implementation. Mr. Connors then reviewed the bike network plan maps by level of priority and also designating the type of link, such as signed bike routes, bike lanes, and shared-use trail. In the second priority level of implementation, the District has emphasized connections between each of the Metra stations and Village business districts. Wayfinding and signage, as a means to improve directions throughout Winnetka for bicycle MINUTES WINNETKA VILLAGE COUNCIL STUDY SESSION October 13, 2015 (Approved: November 17, 2015) A record of a legally convened meeting of the Council of the Village of Winnetka, which was held in the Village Hall Council Chambers on Tuesday, October 13, 2015, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. 1) Call to Order. President Greable called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Trustees Andrew Cripe, Carol Fessler, William Krucks, Stuart McCrary, Scott Myers and Marilyn Prodromos. Absent: None. Also in attendance: Village Manager Robert Bahan, Assistant to the Village Manager Megan Pierce, Village Attorney Karl Camillucci, Police Chief Patrick Kreis, Public Works Director Steve Saunders and approximately 4 persons in the audience. 2) Winnetka Park District – Bikeway Master Plan Update. Robert Smith, Director of the Winnetka Park District, explained that the Bikeway Master Plan (Plan) aims to identify bike trail routes to link up other trail systems, the lakefront and Winnetka’s downtowns. He said revisions to the plan were recommended by the Village Council after a first draft of the plan was presented at an April, 2013 Council meeting. Steve Connor, Hitchcock Design Group and the Park District Bikeway Master Plan consultant, noted that the Park District is seeking approval to implement Phase I of the Plan, and envisions folding the project into the Downtown Master Plan process. His presentation included: • An explanation of the goals of the bikeway project • Maps of the project area • Identification of existing bike facilities • Project phasing and levels of service • Review of public comment received over three public meetings, and Council comments from 2013 • Other potential links for consideration at a later date Mr. Connor said there is wide community support in other comparable communities that have adopted bike plans, and there has been a general increase in bicycling use as a result.

The Council discussed the Plan, noting that major renovations to Hill Road and its sidewalks will be required before it can be designated as an east/west bike link. The safety of children traveling to and from school was expressed as a significant priority of the Council. A few Trustees had reservations about designating Elm Street as the link between Sheridan Road WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN and the Forest Preserves, citing congestion and safety on such a busy Village thoroughfare. Others were not overly concerned about these issues, as children cycling to school tend to stay on the sidewalks. Furthermore, the parents of school children generally coach their children to take routes on quieter streets.

President Greable called for more hard data in the Plan, such as the current number of bike users on Winnetka’s streets, and how many children cycle to school. The Council asked the Police Chief to weigh in on questions about safety. 85 Planning and Landscape Architecture

221 W. Jefferson Avenue Naperville, Illinois 60540

T 630.961.1787 www.hitchcockdesigngroup.com