DOCSLIB.ORG

Route 710 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Route 710 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment Report Route 710 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment Report Task Order PS-4310-1268-05-01-2 Submitted to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90026 MS 99-22-8 Submitted by: June 7, 2006 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ES 1.0 Executive Summary...................................................................................................... 1 ES 1.1 Project Background.................................................................................................. 1 ES 1.2 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment ............................................................... 1 ES 1.3 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment – Findings ............................................ 3 ES 1.4 Physical Feasibility.................................................................................................... 3 ES 1.4.1 Tunneling Technologies...................................................................................... 4 ES 1.4.2 Physical Characteristics ...................................................................................... 5 ES 1.4.3 Traffic Demand................................................................................................... 5 ES 1.5 Environmental/Social Feasibility............................................................................. 6 ES 1.6Financial Feasibility....................................................................................................... 6 ES 1.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 6 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project History .............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 MTA Team .................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 MTA Tunnel Advisory Panel....................................................................................... 3 1.5 MTA Working Group .................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Study Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................... 4 2.0 Summary of Large Highway Tunnels Domestic and International ......................... 5 2.1 A-86 Tunnel, Malmaison, France................................................................................ 6 2.2 M30 Project Madrid, Spain ......................................................................................... 8 2.3 Mt. Baker Ridge Tunnel, Seattle, Washington........................................................... 9 3.0 Geotechnical Evaluation............................................................................................. 13 3.1 Regional Geology and Tectonics................................................................................ 13 3.2 Site Geology ................................................................................................................. 13 3.3 Stratigraphy and Structure........................................................................................ 15 3.3.1 Crystalline Basement Rock................................................................................... 15 3.3.2 Topanga Formation............................................................................................... 15 3.3.3 Monterey/Puente Formation ................................................................................. 21 3.3.4 Unnamed Shale ..................................................................................................... 21 3.3.5 Fernando Formation.............................................................................................. 21 3.3.6 Quaternary Alluvium ............................................................................................ 21 i Route 710 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment Report Table of Contents 3.4 Faults............................................................................................................................ 22 3.4.1 Sierra Madre Fault ................................................................................................ 22 3.4.2 Santa Monica-Hollywood Fault System ............................................................... 22 3.4.3 Raymond Hill Fault............................................................................................... 23 3.4.4 York Boulevard Fault ........................................................................................... 23 3.4.5 Eagle Rock Fault................................................................................................... 23 3.5 Local Seismicity........................................................................................................... 23 3.6 Structure Along Tunnel Study Alignment................................................................ 24 3.7 Site Exploration and Testing in 2006 ........................................................................ 25 3.7.1 Field Exploration for Feasibility Study................................................................. 25 3.7.2 Testing................................................................................................................... 25 3.7.2.1 Soil Properties................................................................................................... 26 3.7.2.2 Rock properties ................................................................................................. 26 3.8 Groundwater ............................................................................................................... 28 3.9 Subsurface Gas............................................................................................................ 29 3.10 Feasibility for Tunneling ............................................................................................ 29 3.11 Additional Exploration and Testing.......................................................................... 30 4.0 Tunneling Technologies.............................................................................................. 31 4.1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 31 4.2 Tunnel Conditions and Requirements ...................................................................... 31 4.2.1 Horizontal Alignment and Controls...................................................................... 31 4.2.2 Vertical Alignment and Controls.......................................................................... 31 4.2.3 Tunnel Cross Sectional Requirements.................................................................. 32 4.2.4 Cross-passages and Shafts .................................................................................... 32 4.2.5 Geologic and Groundwater Conditions ................................................................ 32 4.3 Tunneling Methods ..................................................................................................... 33 4.3.1 Tunnel Boring Machines....................................................................................... 33 4.3.2 Sequential Excavation Methods............................................................................ 38 4.3.3 Fault Crossings...................................................................................................... 41 4.3.4 Undergound Ventilation Buildings and Shafts ..................................................... 42 4.3.5 Hauling of Soil...................................................................................................... 42 4.3.6 Protection of Adjacent Structures ......................................................................... 43 4.3.7 Instrumentation and Monitoring ........................................................................... 44 4.3.8 Summary............................................................................................................... 44 4.4 Tunnel Ventilation ...................................................................................................... 45 4.4.1 Ventilation System Types..................................................................................... 45 4.4.2 Air Cleaning Technology...................................................................................... 46 4.4.3 Tunnel Alternatives............................................................................................... 47 4.4.4 Criteria .................................................................................................................. 47 4.4.5 Analysis Approach................................................................................................ 48 ii Route 710 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment Report Table of Contents 4.4.6 Analysis................................................................................................................. 49 4.4.7 Ventilation Installation.......................................................................................... 50 5.0 Traffic Modeling / Traffic Analysis..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tunnel: SMART Owner: MMC Corp Berhad-Gamuda Berhad Joint
    Tunnel: SMART Owner: MMC Corp Berhad-Gamuda Berhad Joint Venture 40 year concession. Implementation under close supervision by Government of Malaysia (Drainage and Irrigation Dept of Malaysia and Malaysia Highway Authority) Contractor: MMC Corp Berhad-Gamuda Berhad Joint Venture - Principal Contractor and South drive. Ways and Freytag – North drive Consultant(s): Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd, Mott MacDonald Construction Dates: 2002-07 Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Geology: Karstic Limestone and alluvial material TBM: HK Mix Shield slurry machine, 13.2m dia Project description: Dual purpose highway/ storm water tunnel. 2 level stacked roadway with water carrying invert below. SEM adits connect between road decks and provide safe waiting area. Stairs to connect – no step-free option. Lining OD: 12.83m Liner thickness: 500mm Tunnel: Changjiang Under River Tunnel Project (Yangtze River Tunnel) Owner/ client: Shanghai Changjiang Tunnel & Bridge Construction Development Co. Contractor: Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co. Ltd. (STEC) – TBM assembly Bouygues Consultant(s): Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Design Institute (STEDI) Construction Dates: 2006-10 (bores completed 2008) Location: Shanghai, China Geology: Sand, clay, rubble TBM: HK Mix Shield slurry machine, 15.43m dia, 6.5bar water pressure Project description: Twin highway tunnels. 3 traffic lanes. Invert for safety passage and rescue lane. 7.17km in length. Cross-passages: 800m centres Lining OD: (ID = 13.7m) Liner thickness: Liner arrangement: 9+1, 2m long rings Sources: T&TI 24th Oct 08, Jan 07 p7 Tunnel: Madrid Calle 30 South by-pass tunnels Owner: Madrid Municipality Contractor: Dragados-FCC JV for South tunnel (Mitsubishi machine) Consultant(s): Construction Dates: 2004-07 Location: Madrid, Spain Geology: Peñuela (sandy clay), hard Clay with gypsum levels, surface deposits TBM: 2 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 710 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment Report
    Route 710 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment Report Task Order PS-4310-1268-05-01-2 Submitted to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90026 MS 99-22-8 Submitted by: June 7, 2006 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ES 1.0 Executive Summary...................................................................................................... 1 ES 1.1 Project Background.................................................................................................. 1 ES 1.2 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment ............................................................... 1 ES 1.3 Tunnel Technical Feasibility Assessment – Findings ............................................ 3 ES 1.4 Physical Feasibility.................................................................................................... 3 ES 1.4.1 Tunneling Technologies...................................................................................... 4 ES 1.4.2 Physical Characteristics ...................................................................................... 5 ES 1.4.3 Traffic Demand................................................................................................... 5 ES 1.5 Environmental/Social Feasibility............................................................................. 6 ES 1.6Financial Feasibility....................................................................................................... 6 ES 1.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tunel Obsah Na
    11. ROâNÍK, ã. 3/2002 âASOPIS âESKÉHO TUNELÁ¤SKÉHO KOMITÉTU A SLOVENSKEJ TUNELÁRSKEJ ASOCIÁCIE ITA/AITES PODZEMNÍ STAVBY (V¯VOJ, V¯ZKUM, NAVRHOVÁNÍ, REALIZACE) MAGAZINE OF THE CZECH TUNNELLING COMMITTEE AND SLOVAK TUNNELLING ASSOCIATION ITA/AITES UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION (DEVELOPMENT, RESEARCH, DESIGN, REALIZATION) VOLUME 11, No. 3/2002 MK âR 7122 ISSN 1211 - 0728 METROPROJEKT Praha a.s. âeská projektová a inÏen˘rská Czech design and engineering akciová spoleãnost joint-stock company Magazine of the Czech Tunnelling Committee and the Slovak Tunnelling Association ITA/AITES Established by Ing. Jaroslav Grán in1992 CONTENTS pg. Dle Vašich požadavků pro Vás According to your requirements vypracujeme: we elaborate for you: Editorial: Dipl.-Ing. Boris Klement, ILF Consulting Engineers, s. r. o. 1 Design of tube umbrellas ➢ ➢ pre-investment studies & analyses Dipl.-Ing.Dr.Techn. Max John, Dipl.-Ing. Bruno Mattle, ILF Consulting Engineers . 2 rozborové studie a analýzy investic The NATM application on the Copenhagen metro ➢ ➢ Dipl.-Ing. Paul Bonapace, ILF Consulting Engineers . 10 projektovou dokumentaci všech stupňů projekt documentation at all levels The new Tfiebovice tunel project ➢ ➢ Ing. Petr Svoboda, ILF Consulting Engineers, s. r. o. 14 transformaci a autorizaci dokumentace transformation & authorization of project New tunnels on the „Middle" section of the Nuremberg – Ingolstadt high-speed line zahraničních klientů podle českých ➢ Mgr. Jifií Zmítko, ILF Consulting Engineers, s. r. o. 21 documentation of foreign clients in com Vepfiek – the first Czech Railways’ tunnel in the new millenium norem a předpisů pliance with Czech norms and regulations Ing. Jifií Wohlmuth, âeské dráhy, s. o., DDC, o. z., building department Prague . 26 The control of the ground response – milestones up to the 1960s (completion) ➢ ➢ Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Tunnels for Transportation Purposes and Face Stability of Mechanically Driven Tunnels in Soft Ground
    Copyright by Seung Han Kim 2010 The Dissertation Committee for Seung Han Kim Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Large Tunnels for Transportation Purposes and Face Stability of Mechanically Driven Tunnels in Soft Ground Committee: Fulvio Tonon, Supervisor Karin Bäppler Chadi El Mohtar Loukas Kallivokas Jorge G. Zornberg Large Tunnels for Transportation Purposes and Face Stability of Mechanically Driven Tunnels in Soft Ground by Seung Han Kim, B.S.; M.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2010 Dedication To my family. Acknowledgements I would like to express sincere gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Fulvio Tonon for his guidance, support, and encouragement throughout this research. I would also appreciate to other dissertation committee members, Dr. Jorge Zornberg, Dr. Chadi El Mohtar, Dr. Loukas Kallivokas and Dr. Karin Bäppler. v Large Tunnels for Transportation Purposes and Face Stability of Mechanically Driven Tunnels in Soft Ground Publication No._____________ Seung Han Kim, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2010 Supervisor: Fulvio Tonon With the advent of the large diameter tunnel boring machine (TBM), mechanically driven large diameter tunnel is becoming a more attractive option. During operation, a large diameter tube allows for stacked deck configuration with shafts dropped to platform level (no station caverns). The extensive information has been compiled on innovative TBM tunneling projects such as the Barcelona Line 9, where the concept of continuous station has been used for the first time, stormwater management and roadway tunnel in Malaysia, where the floodwater bypass tunnel and the road tunnel are incorporated in a single bore tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • BORED TUNNEL CONCEPT for AWVSRP 1. Introduction a Number
    BORED TUNNEL CONCEPT FOR AWVSRP 1. Introduction Formatted: Font: Bold A number of interested parties have suggested that a bored bypass tunnel be Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.25" considered in the collaborative process examining alternatives for the central waterfront section of the Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program. This concept would route SR 99 in twin two-lane tunnels running for approximately two miles under downtown from the vicinity of the stadiums to the vicinity of the north portal of the Battery Street Tunnel. While the concept presents some alignment and traffic performance challenges, it takes advantage of current technology and has the potential to reduce cost and construction impacts compared to other alternatives. Formatted: Font: Bold 2. Previously Considered Tunnel Alternatives (and why they were not carried forward) Several tunnel alternatives have been considered for the AWVSRP: • In 2002 a concept that featured twin three-lane bored tunnels was set aside because the required diameter of 55’ pushed the achievable threshold of boring- machine technology. • In 2004 a two-lane bypass cut-and-cover tunnel along the waterfront was judged inferior to other alternatives in terms of traffic operations and capacity. Deleted: • In 2007 the preferred three-lane cut-and-cover tunnel along the waterfront encountered objections to the construction cost, risks and impacts. 3. Bored Tunnel Technology Formatted: Font: Bold Improvements in modern tunnel boring machines have greatly reduced previous Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25", risks associated with ground surface settlement and made bored tunnels cost First line: 0.25" competitive with cut-and-cover tunnels, with substantially less construction impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • You Can't Go Anywhere Until You Harness Your Horse
    STRATEGIES FOR BUSINESS IN MOSCOW You can’t go anywhere until you harness your horse Russian proverb A PROPOS A straight line is the shortest path between two points. infrastructure for a long time. For example, he talked about the Unfortunately, life isn’t math. In a big city, getting from point importance of introducing paid parking in the center. According A to point B is sometimes a big problem. However, Moscow is to him, this step ensured that disorganized parking all over definitely a city that has become easier to get around over the the city no longer causes accidents and traffic jams. Moreover, past few years. There is a wide network of convenient public Vukan Vuchic pointed out that reorganizing the city streets transport: buses, trolleys, trams, trains, taxis, and, of course, to make them more convenient for pedestrians makes a lot of the Moscow metro. After a long break, the city has once again sense. He was especially impressed with the development of started to work on developing its transport infrastructure. public transport in the capital: “The turnstiles that made getting The Russian capital’s government has managed to break on and off slower have been removed,” he said, “The city has the trend leftover from the 90s, which nearly resulted in designated lanes for public transport. Moscow made the decision a transport collapse in the city. to stop purchasing diesel-powered transport in the future, which is very important for the environment. Cities that shift to electric Not so long ago, Moscow was drowning in traffic jams.
    [Show full text]
  • Files in (Stads)Tunnels Case: MAASTUNNEL Rotterdam
    Henk van der Maas Files in (stads)Tunnels Veiligheidsbeambte Dick den Ouden Case: MAASTUNNEL Verkeerskundige Rotterdam Bouw 1937-1942 File in de Maastunnel Oeververbindingen over/onder de Nieuwe Maas Beneluxtunnel Erasmusbrug Willemsbrug Maastunnel Van Brienenoordbrug Beneluxtunnel Maastunnel Erasmusbrug Willemsbrug Van Brienenoordbrug Motorvoertuigen 130.000 60.000 30.000 20.000 230.000 In jaren ’60 tot 90.000 voertuigen/dag geregistreerd. Riviertunnel Landtunnel Lengteprofiel Scope Renovatie Maastunnel 2017-2019 1. Asbestsanering afgerond in 2012 2. Betonherstel 3. Tunnelveiligheid (tunnelwet) 4. Herstel Rijksmonument 5. Opgave Bereikbaarheid Vijf conflicterende belangen 1. Veiligheid, 2. beschikbaarheid, 3. monument, 4. Onderhoudbaarheid (robuust), 5. geld Verkeershinder bij totale afsluiting 18.00 uur Verkeershinder 15.00-21.00 uur Verkeershinder bij Buis voor Buis afsluiting 18.00 uur Verkeershinder 16.00 – 19.00 uur Waarom moeten tunnels filevrij blijven ? 1. Waarom moeten tunnels filevrij blijven: BRAND (+ Gevaarlijke Stoffen) 1. Want: standaardoplossing RWS: langsventilatie 2. Bezwaar langsventilatie: werkt niet bij files in tunnel 3. Is langsventilatie de enige oplossing ? 4. Zo niet: zijn files dan erg? Vier mogelijke oplossingscombinaties A) Dwarsventilatie met vrachtwagenverbod B) Dwarsventilatie met FFFS (Automatisch blussysteem) C) Langsventilatie met dwarsventilatie (hybride ventilatie) D) Langsventilatie met filemanagement (AFM) Internationaal: Oplossing bij de veel (complexe) stadstunnels: dwarsventilatie (al dan niet in combinatie met langsventilatie en/of FFFS). Dwarsventilatie werkt niet goed bij lange rivier- of bergtunnels, Daar te lage capaciteit Wel mogelijk bij parkeergarages, metrostations, landtunnels Langsventilatie werkt niet goed bij afslagen in tunnels Komt veel voor bij stadstunnels, want die willen we juist om complexe ruimtelijke problemen op te lossen Complexe problemen -> Complexe oplossingen Voorbeelden van nieuwe lange stadstunnels .
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of Old Moscow in the Years Before Lenin and Stalin
    Memoirs of Old Moscow in the years before Lenin and Stalin Vladimir Gilyarovsky translated and edited by Brian Murphy Michael Pursglove Memoirs of Old Moscow in the years before Lenin and Stalin Vladimir Gilyarovsky translated and edited by Brian Murphy Michael Pursglove The translators Brian Murphy: Former Professor of Russian, University of Ulster; former UN translator; translator and editor of Mikhail Sholokhov's Quiet Flows the Don. Michael Pursglove: Former Senior Lecturer in Russian, University of Exeter; translator of Ivan Turgenev's Fathers and Children, Smoke and Virgin Soil (all Alma Classics), of D.V. Grigorovich's Anton and of numerous Russian short stories. Cover Kitai-gorod from Theatre Square, photographed by Nikolai Naidenov in 1884 PREFACE The casual reader might be surprised to learn that none of the chapters of this book, such a nostalgic evocation of old Russia, were published before 1926 and that the majority of them date from 1934 or 1935. A more careful reading will reveal references to post-1917 Russia, but these are relatively few: aeroplanes, the metro, the cleaning up of the filthy River Neglinka, the demolition of the Khitrovka slum, NEP, the opening of the House of the Peasant in what had been the Hermitage Restaurant or the workers' demonstration which ends the chapter devoted to his great friend Anton Chekhov. It is, however, surprising that a book which, for all its occasional nods of approval to the Soviet regime, contains long passages devoted to Moscow's flourishing merchant class,was allowed to be published in the 1930s. This was a time when, especially after the First All-Union Congress of Soviet Writers in August 1934, Communist Party control over all branches of the Arts was consolidated.
    [Show full text]
  • Booklet En.Pdf
    ENGEOCOM’s significant contribution to the largest Moscow, Russian and international projects is a given fact… Hard work and creativity of thousands of employees are duly and highly rewarded; we are constantly moving up in our difficult and beloved business… Mikhail Rudyak, Company Founder METRO CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTION COMPLEX IN LOBNYA ROAD CONSTRUCTION CIVIL CONSTRUCTION AIRFIELD AND AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION HYDROTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION LICENSES, WARRANTS, CERTIFICATES TABLE OF CONTENTS 9 About the Company 14 Projects 19 Metro Construction 39 Production Complex in Lobnya 47 Road Construction 63 Civil Construction 93 Airfield and Airport Construction 103 Hydrotechnical Construction 109 Licenses, Warrants, Certificates Construction is a beautiful business because you leave things that will be used for years to come… Mikhail Rudyak, Company Founder ABOUT THE COMPANY ENGEOCOM Association JSC is one of Russia’s largest construction holdings. The company was established in 1989 and since its foundation has been focusing on design and development of the most challenging facilities. ENGEOCOM brand today encompasses operations of several enterprises with more than 6 thousand employees. Over 27 years, the holding has successfully implemented more than 250 projects in Russia and beyond. The company’s competitive advantage is the application of innovative technologies and tailor-made design solutions. The key areas of activity are metro construction, civil and road construction, and airfield construction. Over years, ENGEOCOM has succeeded in both keeping and significantly strengthening its positions on the Russian construction market. The association has turned into a multi-industry holding. The company has an extensive experience in carrying out major projects of development and refurbishment of transport infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Refereces-July 2012
    References Dätwyler References for TBM driven tunnels (beginning 2001) North America 45 Asia 85 Europe 274 Africa 12 South America 8 Australia & Oceania 11 / 457 tunnel projects worldwide* ________________________________ / 281 in Europe In Outside Water Projects built Profile type tunnel-dia. pressure (m) (bar) EUROPE & MIDDLE EAST / Belgium TGV “ASDAM” Tunnel, Antwerp 2002 385 27 8,0 2,1 Liefkenshoekspoortunnel, Antwerp 2009 389 10 8,1 4,0 / Netherlands Pannerdensch Kanaal, Angeren 2001 385 44 9,49 3,4 Groene Hart Tunnel, Leiderdoorp 2002 385 87a 14,5 4,0 Ranstad Rail Tunnel Rotterdam 2005 385 44 6,5 3,0 Hubertustunnel, Den Haag 2005 385 87a 10,2 2,2 Gasleidingtunnel Eems-Dollard 2009 385 87a 3,5 3,0 Sluiskiltunnel 2012 389 09a 11,0 3,6 / Federal Republic of Germany Tunnel Moosach Line U3, Munich 2007 19-882 7,10 2,2 Katzenberg, Railway DB, 2006 1’001’681 10,8 10 ADL “Bi-Wa-Tunnel”, Berlin 2002 385 58a 3,54 3,0 Herrentunnel Lübeck 2002 385 73 11,3 3,6 Metro Hamburg, Airport Link 2005 385 73 6,6 3,0 City Tunnel Leipzig 2007 385 58a 8,7 3,0 Nord-Süd-Stadtbahn Köln, Los Nord 2006 385 44 6,55 2,5 Nord-Süd-Stadtbahn Köln, Los Süd 2006 385 87a 8,1 2,45 New “Schlüchterner Tunnel” 2007 385 73 9,9 4,0 Finnetunnel, Thüringen 2008 385 89a 10,5 6,1 U4 Hafencity Hamburg 2008 385 87a 6,3 4,0 Wehrhahnlinie Düsseldorf 2009 385 44 9,2 1,75 New „Kaiser-Wilhelm-Tunnel“ 2010 385 73 9,8 3,0 XFEL Tunnel Los 1 und Los 2 2010 385 87a 5,9 / 5,2 1,75 / Great Britain Airside Road Tunnel, Heathrow 2002 385 54a 8,8 2,5 Hendon to Colindale Cable Tunnel 2007 383 92 2,86 Belfast Sewer Tunnel & Shafts 2007 385 41a 4,55 / 2,8 Brixton to Honor Oak Water Supply 2008 385 41a 3,36 3,0 Sefton Tank 2008 385 41a Lee Tunnel 2010 385 66 8,50 4,0 Corrib Tunnel 2012 385 87a 4,00 1,9 London Crossrail C305 2012 389 12 6,8 4,0 London Crossrail C310 2012 389 12 6,8 4,0 London Crossrail C300 2012 389 12 6,8 4,0 2 Outside Water Projects built Profile type tunnel-dia.
    [Show full text]
  • VINCI Construction Grands Projets
    _Contents 5, cours Ferdinand de Lesseps F-92851 Rueil-Malmaison Cedex Tel: (+33) 1 47 16 47 00 Fax: (+33) 1 47 16 33 60 Contents GROUP PRESENTATION OPERATING DIVISIONS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS France - Europe - 8 Highlights flap Americas Profile 1 Executive Committee 2 Socaso / Socatop 13 Editorial 3 Eastern Europe - 14 Africa - Asia Key figures 4 A company operating world-wide 6 Bâtiment Export 18 Engineering sector 20 IMPLANTATIONS 24 Annual report 2003 _ VINCI Construction Grands Projets performed the ci engineering work and coordinated the design stud and other work on the Peace Tower in Saint Peters built to commemorate the city’s tricentennial. _Contents 5, cours Ferdinand de Lesseps F-92851 Rueil-Malmaison Cedex Tel: (+33) 1 47 16 47 00 Fax: (+33) 1 47 16 33 60 Contents GROUP PRESENTATION OPERATING DIVISIONS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS France - Europe - 8 Highlights flap Americas Profile 1 Executive Committee 2 Socaso / Socatop 13 Editorial 3 Eastern Europe - 14 Africa - Asia Key figures 4 A company operating world-wide 6 Bâtiment Export 18 Engineering sector 20 IMPLANTATIONS 24 Annual report 2003 _ VINCI Construction Grands Projets performed the ci engineering work and coordinated the design stud and other work on the Peace Tower in Saint Peters built to commemorate the city’s tricentennial. _Group presentation Highlights JANUARY APRIL JULY OCTOBER As part of the four extensions various systems and coordina- VINCI Construction Grands The official handover for the In 2003, VINCI Construction of the Athens metro now under tion of the various building Projets has received ISO 9001: Berjaya Times Square project Grands Projets launched an construction, and on the strength trades involved in the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Herrenknecht Ag Softground Tbms > 40 Ft
    HERRENKNECHT AG SOFTGROUND TBMS >40 FT Project No. Project name Shield diameter [m] S - 108 Elbtunnel Hamburg, Germany 14.20 S - 164 Lefortovo Moscow, Russia 14.20 S - 250 Silberwald Moscow, Russia 14.20 S - 252 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 13.21 S - 253 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 13.21 S - 300 M-30 Madrid, Spain 15.20 S - 317 Shanghai, China 15.43 S - 318 Shanghai, China 15.43 S - 349 Nanjing, China 14.93 S - 350 Nanjing, China 14.93 S - 352 Münster Wiesing, Austria 13.00 S - 381 H8 Jenbach, Austria 13.00 S - 483 Moscow, Russia 14.20 S - 534 Sochi, Russia 13.21 Pre-Design Moscow, Russia 19.00 Reference Papers: - The making of the Mixshield. - Lifting the lid on Mixshield performance. - The latest technology in mechanized tunneling – the design of the world’s largest EPB and slurry shield TBMs. HERRENKNECHT | TRAFFIC TUNNELLING SALES.NET PROJECT DATASHEET. Updated: 5/15/2008 S-Number: S-108 Name: 4. Röhre Elbtunnel Hamburg Location: Hamburg Country: Germany . MAIN GEOLOGY CONTRACT TBM SPEC. TBM PROGRESS BACKGROUND . S-Number: S-108 . Project Name: 4. Röhre Elbtunnel Hamburg . Location: Hamburg . Country: Germany . Sales Region: Europe . Diameter: 14200 mm . Total Tunnel Length: 2560 m . Machine Type: Mixshield . Employment: Road . Project Status: Finished . ... MAIN GEOLOGY CONTRACT TBM SPEC. TBM PROGRESS BACKGROUND . Max. Op. Pressure: 5.5 bar Geology: Sand, boulder clay, silt and gravel, erratic blocks . 1 HERRENKNECHT | TRAFFIC TUNNELLING SALES.NET PROJECT DATASHEET. Updated: 5/15/2008 S-Number: S-164 Name: Lefortovo Location: Moscow Country: Russia . MAIN GEOLOGY CONTRACT TBM SPEC. TBM PROGRESS BACKGROUND .
    [Show full text]