18 the Pharos/Autumn 2015 It Is No Exaggeration to Say That What Is

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

18 the Pharos/Autumn 2015 It Is No Exaggeration to Say That What Is It is no exaggeration to say that What is Life? is one of the most impor- tant scientific books of all time. —Graeme K. Hunter1p252 On professional biologists the book had probably little or no influence. In so far as they bothered at all to read “What is Life?,” they probably consid- ered the title a piece of colossal nerve. At their most charitable, they must have viewed the book with amused tolerance. —Gunther S. Stent2p3 The Austrian scientist Professor Erwin Schrödinger. He shared the 1933 Nobel Prize for his research into atomic theory. 18 /Autumn 2015 © Hulton-DeutschThe Collection/CORBISPharos The remarkable life of Erwin Schrödinger’s What Is Life? Curtis E. Margo, MD, MPH, and Lynn E. Harman, MD Dr. Margo (AΩA, Emory University, 1974) is Clinical The audience was diverse, ranging from students to dignitaries, Professor of Ophthalmology, and Pathology and Cell including Eamon de Valera, the Irish prime minister. Because Biology at the Morsani College of Medicine, the University so many people had to be turned away, Schrödinger repeated of South Florida. Dr. Harman (AΩA, University of the lecture the following Monday to another packed hall. The South Florida, 1993) is Clinical Assistant Professor of lectures continued weekly into March, with little falloff in at- Ophthalmology at the Morsani College of Medicine, the tendance. Interest in the talks was understandable, given the University of South Florida. novelty of hearing a renowned physicist (who just fifteen years earlier had helped to disassemble the common-sense universe n the evening of February 5, 1943, famed theoretical of Newton) discuss a subject so removed from the physical physicist Erwin Schrödinger delivered the first in a sciences. Even in America, as the nation was transfixed on series of lectures titled “What Is Life?” In the weeks the aerial bombardment of northern Germany and fighting in Oprior to the event, news spread that it would be open to the Guadalcanal, the lectures made news. But coverage in the press public. The lecture was held at Trinity College, Dublin, where was trifling. TIME magazine devoted more space to describing Schrödinger was head of the Institute of Advanced Studies. Schrödinger’s love of the Gaelic language and Irish music than The Pharos/Autumn 2015 19 The remarkable life of Erwin Schrödinger’s What Is Life? to the content of the presentation.3 Schrödinger, however, missed Austria. In 1936, he ac- Following the lecture series, Schrödinger prepared the cepted a professorship at the Karl Franzen University of Graz, material for publication, adding an epilogue on determinism along with an honorary position at the University of Vienna. and free will that had not been presented originally. The book Ostensibly unconcerned about the threat of Nazism, he found What Is Life? was released in December 1944. At $1.85 a copy, himself in considerable danger when Adolf Hitler annexed it sold briskly despite wartime austerity. As the upheaval of Austria in 1938. Schrödinger was viewed by the government as World War II ended, the book remained surprisingly popular. untrustworthy, and ordered by the Nazi rector of the university A second edition without substantive editorial revision was to write a public apology (or confession) to the Führer. The published in 1948. It was eventually translated into seven lan- letter was published in German and Austrian papers, leaving guages and sold over 100,000 copies.4p403 Schrödinger humiliated and his British colleagues bewildered. As the sophistication of biochemical and genetic research Soon thereafter, he was summarily dismissed from the profes- soared in the 1950s and 1960s, opinions concerning What Is sorship at his alma mater. With the help of friends in England Life? among elite scientists became oddly polarized. Some and Ireland, he managed to escape Austria with his family claimed the book was an influential document that ushered before war descended on the continent. in the new epoch of molecular biology, while others viewed Schrödinger was unable to return to Oxford as an émigré of it as factually misleading and unoriginal. Biochemist Graeme a combatant nation once the war began, but he obtained a posi- Hunter proclaimed it “one of the most important scientific tion as head of the newly created Dublin Institute of Advanced books of all time,” 1p252 while bacteriophage biologist Gunther Studies. He remained in Ireland for seventeen years. Stent thought any admiration as unwarranted.2 Few twentieth- century science books have received more divergent appraisals. The book Though no single explanation may adequately address this What Is Life? is a concise manuscript of roughly 27,000 anomaly, exploring the contradictory verdicts may shed light words, slightly shorter than George Orwell’s Animal Farm.5 on the factors that have shaped modern biology. It conveys an excitement about deciphering genetics that conventional textbooks never approach. Schrödinger may Erwin Schrödinger not have expected the intended audience to understand the Erwin Schrödinger (1887–1961) was born and raised in mathematics or physics behind the arguments he proposes, Vienna, Austria. The only child of a wealthy bourgeoisie fam- but he did want readers to sense the power of human intellect ily, he enjoyed a comfortable life insulated from the social to comprehend nature. He covers subjects as different and strife that marked the waning years of the Hapsburg Empire. complex as statistical mechanics, the laws of thermodynamics, His aunt Minnie taught him English at an early age. A brilliant and Mendelian genetics through the liberal use of analogies student, he excelled in mathematics and the humanities at and nearly a dozen line drawings. The book contains scattered Akademisches Gymnasium and the University of Vienna, from footnotes, a rare reference, and no bibliography. In the first which he was awarded a Doctor of Philosophy in physics in three chapters, Schrödinger summarizes the modern physicist’s 1910. Schrödinger rose steadily through the ranks of academia approach to investigating atoms and molecules, the biological to become Professor of Theoretical Physics in Zürich in 1922. mechanism of inheritance, and recent animal experiments His greatest intellectual achievement occurred four years with X-ray induced mutations. Although these reviews are later, with the publication of six papers on wave mechanics in superficial and prone to oversimplification, Schrödinger fuels Annalen der Physik. These works culminated in the wave equa- expectations that some magnificent insight is always lurking tion, which describes the behavior of particles in the atomic on the next page. and subatomic world. A computational cornerstone of quan- Schrödinger accommodates the nonscientist by assuming tum mechanics, the wave equation (which now bears his name) the role of a supportive teacher. This was a particularly exciting catapulted Schrödinger to the most prestigious academic posi- time in biology. The chromosome that biologists were just be- tion in Germany: Professor of Theoretical Physics in Berlin and ginning to explore is what he calls an aperiodic crystal, “a mas- successor to Max Planck.4 terpiece of embroidery” equivalent to a “Raphael tapestry.” 5p5 After Schrödinger arrived in Berlin in 1927 he found the While praising the organic chemist for contributing knowledge political and social atmosphere increasingly disturbing. In 1933, about this tapestry, he laments the physicist for having done he abruptly left Berlin to become a Fellow of Magdalen College, next to nothing to further understanding of the molecule. He Oxford, a decision many friends believed was in protest of is both perplexed and awed by this genetic substance, undoubt- Nazi malevolence. After arriving in Oxford, Schrödinger was edly a polymer, because it reproduces itself with remarkable awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for his wave equation. This fidelity for generations. To emphasize this key point with a international recognition not only highlighted his awkward tangible example, he selects the infamous Hapsburg lip, faith- departure from Berlin, it insured that the Nazi officials would fully preserved throughout the long dynasty. remember the move as an insult. In the second chapter, Schrödinger introduces the term 20 The Pharos/Autumn 2015 code-script to describe the key function of the chromosome. He among scientists,” yet cautioned that this “meaty exposition” soon apologizes for the inadequacy of even this term, stating was not light reading.7p283 that the material of life is more than just a blueprint. Consider More thorough reviews appeared in professional journals. it instead both an “architect’s plan and builder’s craft—in Distinguished geneticist J. B. S. Haldane, writing in Nature, re- one.” 5p22 His translation of science to the vernacular is artful spectfully disagreed with many of Schrödinger’s “details” and and absolutely necessary to offset the rapid pace at which he “fundamental principles,” but admitted that the work was fas- introduces complicated ideas. Technical words and theorems cinating to read.8 Herman Muller, perhaps the most eminent are seemingly plucked from nowhere. Schrödinger eases the geneticist of the World War II era (and who performed much tension of scientific jargon with the implicit assurance that of the original work on radiation-induced genetic mutations), everything will eventually make sense. complimented Schrödinger for emphasizing the need for From the third to sixth chapters, Schrödinger discusses strengthening the liaison between the physical and biological the quantum nature of genetic mutations and the application sciences. But he, too, warned readers not to take the genetics of the second law of thermodynamics to living matter. Gaps in and chemistry too seriously, because they were incomplete development of concepts are inevitable without mathematics and flawed.9 or sufficient space. The crux of his thesis is found in the fourth After the molecular revolution that followed the discovery chapter: “In the light of present knowledge, the mechanism of of DNA structure in 1953, What Is Life? began to be viewed in heredity is closely related to, nay, founded on, the very basis a different light.
Recommended publications
  • Contribution to the Historical Development of Macromolecular Chemistry – Exemplified on Cellulose
    CELLULOSE CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY CONTRIBUTION TO THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY – EXEMPLIFIED ON CELLULOSE PETER ZUGENMAIER Institute of Physical Chemistry, Clausthal University of Technology, D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany Dedicated to Professor Elfriede Husemann, on the occasion of her 100th birthday in December 2008. She was an admirable and internationally highly recognized scientist and the first director of the Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry (Hermann-Staudinger-Haus) of the Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg; the foundation of the institute owing to the eminent scientific success and recognition of the work of Hermann Staudinger, leading to the Nobel Prize in the field of macromolecular chemistry. Received October 20, 2009 The development of the structure determination for cellulose and its derivatives as macromolecules is described from the beginning of the 20th century to the 1940s. The first correct presentation of the constitution of cellulose as a linear chain macromolecule of 1-4 linked β-D-anhydroglucopyranose, with the help of organic chemistry, dates from 1928. The size and shape of cellulose molecules still remained a controversial topic for some time. On the one hand, there were proposals of micelles i.e. aggregates of cyclic mono- or oligoanhydroglucose or micelles of small macromolecules of 30-50 glucose units. On the other hand, cellulose was seen as large macromolecules with more than 3000 glucose units for structures considered in solution as well as in fibres. The final clarification of the cellulose structure as a semi-flexible macromolecule of high molecular weight was extremely hindered by the inadequate interpretation of experimental results. Later, additional experimental and theoretical methods led to a consistent picture of the cellulose structure with high precision.
    [Show full text]
  • Microanalysis of Polymer Chain Diffusion in Heat Seals Russell Cooper Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 12-2014 Microanalysis of Polymer Chain Diffusion in Heat Seals Russell Cooper Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Engineering Science and Materials Commons, Materials Science and Engineering Commons, and the Polymer Science Commons Recommended Citation Cooper, Russell, "Microanalysis of Polymer Chain Diffusion in Heat Seals" (2014). All Theses. 2039. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2039 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MICROANALYSIS OF POLYMER CHAIN DIFFUSION IN HEAT SEALS A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Packaging Science by Russell Timms Cooper December 2014 Accepted by: Dr. Duncan Darby, Committee Chair Dr. Robert Kimmel Dr. Patrick Gerard ABSTRACT Heat sealing is an integral method for the closure and protection of packaging. Previous work has shown that seal strength is developed by the interdiffusion of polymer chains within heat seals. Heat seals were made between two dissimilar materials. Poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid) (EAA) was heat sealed to ionomer. Diffusion within the EAA-ionomer heat seals was estimated. The diffusion estimates were then related to resulting seal strength in the EAA-ionomer sealant system. Heated tooling sealing was utilized to make heat seals at 40 psi (275.79 kPa), 0.5 seconds, and a range of temperatures between 180˚F (82.22˚C) and 300˚F (148.89˚C).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Group NEWSLETTER and SUMMARY of PAPERS
    Historical Group NEWSLETTER and SUMMARY OF PAPERS No. 76 Summer 2019 Registered Charity No. 207890 COMMITTEE Chairman: Dr Peter J T Morris Dr Christopher J Cooksey (Watford, 5 Helford Way, Upminster, Essex RM14 1RJ Hertfordshire) [e-mail: [email protected]] Prof Alan T Dronsfield (Swanwick) Secretary: Prof. John W Nicholson Dr John A Hudson (Cockermouth) 52 Buckingham Road, Hampton, Middlesex, Prof Frank James (Royal Institution) TW12 3JG [e-mail: [email protected]] Dr Michael Jewess (Harwell, Oxon) Membership Prof Bill P Griffith Dr Fred Parrett (Bromley, London) Secretary: Department of Chemistry, Imperial College, Prof Henry Rzepa (Imperial College) London, SW7 2AZ [e-mail: [email protected]] Treasurer: Prof Richard Buscall Exeter, Devon [e-mail: [email protected]] Newsletter Dr Anna Simmons Editor Epsom Lodge, La Grande Route de St Jean, St John, Jersey, JE3 4FL [e-mail: [email protected]] Newsletter Dr Gerry P Moss Production: School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS [e-mail: [email protected]] https://www.qmul.ac.uk/sbcs/rschg/ http://www.rsc.org/historical/ 1 Contents From the Editor (Anna Simmons) 2 RSC HISTORICAL GROUP JOINT AUTUMN MEETING 3 William Crookes (1832-1919) 3 RSC HISTORICAL GROUP NEWS 4 Secretary’s Report for 2018 (John Nicholson) 4 MEMBERS’ PUBLICATIONS 4 PUBLICATIONS OF INTEREST 4 NEWS FROM CATALYST (Alan Dronsfield) 5 FORTHCOMING EXHIBITIONS 6 SOCIETY NEWS 6 OTHER NEWS 6 SHORT ESSAYS 7 How Group VIII Elements Posed a Problem for Mendeleev (Bill Griffith) 7 Norium, Mnemonics and Mackay (William.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Polymer Science
    262 Advances in Polymer Science Editorial Board: A. Abe, Tokyo, Japan A.-C. Albertsson, Stockholm, Sweden G.W. Coates, Ithaca, NY, USA J. Genzer, Raleigh, NC, USA S. Kobayashi, Kyoto, Japan K.-S. Lee, Daejeon, South Korea L. Leibler, Paris, France T.E. Long, Blacksburg, VA, USA M. Mo¨ller, Aachen, Germany O. Okay, Istanbul, Turkey B.Z. Tang, Hong Kong, China E.M. Terentjev, Cambridge, UK M.J. Vicent, Valencia, Spain B. Voit, Dresden, Germany U. Wiesner, Ithaca, NY, USA X. Zhang, Beijing, China For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/12 Aims and Scope The series Advances in Polymer Science presents critical reviews of the present and future trends in polymer and biopolymer science. It covers all areas of research in polymer and biopolymer science including chemistry, physical chemistry, physics, material science. The thematic volumes are addressed to scientists, whether at universities or in industry, who wish to keep abreast of the important advances in the covered topics. Advances in Polymer Science enjoys a longstanding tradition and good reputa- tion in its community. Each volume is dedicated to a current topic, and each review critically surveys one aspect of that topic, to place it within the context of the volume. The volumes typically summarize the significant developments of the last 5 to 10 years and discuss them critically, presenting selected examples, explaining and illustrating the important principles, and bringing together many important references of primary literature. On that basis, future research directions in the area can be discussed. Advances in Polymer Science volumes thus are important refer- ences for every polymer scientist, as well as for other scientists interested in polymer science - as an introduction to a neighboring field, or as a compilation of detailed information for the specialist.
    [Show full text]
  • Polymers:Where the Sciences Meet-An Editor's Reflections
    高分子●高分子●●●展望 COVER STORY Vo1.57,No.672 Jan.1,2008●● 展望COVER STORY v・1.57, Polymers:Where the Sciences Meet-An Editor's Reflections Text by Peter GOLITZ The Past: The past 25 years, over which I have been the Editor-in-chief of Angewandte Chemie, have seen a dramatic development of polymer science. Around 1980, polymer or macromolecular science was certainly a lively field, but, based on the definition of the term "polymers",U it was much more restricted; it was practiced by polymer chemists, physicists and engineers, and the interaction with other sciences in general or other fields of chemistry in particular was rather limited. All the main classes of polymers existed already, and there was an extensive industry behind this science, a fact that has not changed. Structural polymers abounded, and through blending of different polymer classes new applications were sought. Functional polymers were in their infancy. At just about the time Heeger, MacDiarmid, and Shirakawa had developed conducting polymers,4 3) polymers were occasionally being used as supports for organic reactions,41 and the use of polymers in medicine was more a vision.51 The realm of biomacromolecules—oligonucleotides, proteins, carbohydrates—was very much separated and researched by biochemists, structural biologists etc. Today: These days a Google search for key polymer-related terms delivers impressive results (Table 1). Polymer science knows no boundaries, and interactions with other disciplines are commonplace! Table 1. Number of Hits in Google for Polymer-Related
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Theory in Control Practice.Pdf
    The Role of Theory" in Control Practice! Manfred Morari! ! ! Automatic Control Laboratory, ETH Zürich! UTC BUSINESSES Commercial Aerospace 3 PERFORMANCESales: Type & Geography 2012 net sales $57.7 billion TYPE Commercial Commercial Aftermarket Aerospace 28% & Industrial 51% 57% 43% Military Aerospace 21% Original & Space Equipment Manufacturing GEOGRAPHY Europe 26% United States 40% 20% 14% Asia Pacific Other 4 2013 ENGINEERING POPULATION ! ! ! ! ! ! PHD Other AS MS UTC Global population > 24,000 BS UTC Engineering presence engineers ! US Engineering Degrees ETH Zurich at a glance Founded 1855 " Driving force of industrialisation in Switzerland ETH Zurich today " One of the leading international universities for technology and the natural sciences " Place of study, research and employment for approximately 25,000 people from over 100 different countries Some Numbers: " 8500 BS + 4800 MS + 3900 PhD = 18200 " 500 Professors " 8000 Personnel " Budget CHF 1.5 (370 Mill third party) Placeholder for logo/lettering | | (Can be modified in the Slide Master, opened via «View» > «Slide Master») 29.04.2014 6 21 Nobel Laureates 1901 Physics Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen 1912 Chemistry Alfred Werner 1915 Chemistry Richard Willstätter 1918 Chemistry Fritz Haber 1920 Physics Charles-Edouard Guillaume 1921 Physics Albert Einstein 1936 Chemistry Peter Debye 1938 Chemistry Richard Kuhn 1939 Chemistry Leopold Ruzicka Albert Leopold Wolfgang 1943 Physics Otto Stern Einstein Ruzicka Pauli 1945 Physics Wolfgang Pauli 1950 Medicine Tadeusz Reichstein 1952 Physics Felix Bloch 1953 Chemistry Hermann Staudinger 1975 Chemistry Vladimir Prelog 1978 Medicine Werner Arber 1986 Physics Heinrich Rohrer 1987 Physics Georg Bednorz / Alexander Müller 1991 Chemistry Richard Ernst Vladimir Richard Kurt 2002 Chemistry Kurt Wüthrich Prelog Ernst Wüthrich Placeholder for logo/lettering | | (Can be modified in the Slide Master, opened via «View» > «Slide Master») 29.04.2014 7 John Houbolt! NASA Innovator Behind Lunar Module, Dies at 95! Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 August 2013 Seminar Held
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NOBEL PRIZE SEMINAR 2012 (NPS 2012) 0 Organized by School of Chemistry Editor: Dr. Nabakrushna Behera Lecturer, School of Chemistry, S.U. (E-mail: [email protected]) 24 August 2013 Seminar Held Sambalpur University Jyoti Vihar-768 019 Odisha Organizing Secretary: Dr. N. K. Behera, School of Chemistry, S.U., Jyoti Vihar, 768 019, Odisha. Dr. S. C. Jamir Governor, Odisha Raj Bhawan Bhubaneswar-751 008 August 13, 2013 EMSSSEM I am glad to know that the School of Chemistry, Sambalpur University, like previous years is organizing a Seminar on "Nobel Prize" on August 24, 2013. The Nobel Prize instituted on the lines of its mentor and founder Alfred Nobel's last will to establish a series of prizes for those who confer the “greatest benefit on mankind’ is widely regarded as the most coveted international award given in recognition to excellent work done in the fields of Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, and Peace. The Prize since its introduction in 1901 has a very impressive list of winners and each of them has their own story of success. It is heartening that a seminar is being organized annually focusing on the Nobel Prize winning work of the Nobel laureates of that particular year. The initiative is indeed laudable as it will help teachers as well as students a lot in knowing more about the works of illustrious recipients and drawing inspiration to excel and work for the betterment of mankind. I am sure the proceeding to be brought out on the occasion will be highly enlightening.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates in Chemistry and Physics
    NOBEL LAUREATES IN CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS Full details on nationality and basis of the awards can be found at <nobelprize .org/> . Chemistry 2008 Martin Chalfie, Osamu Shimomura, Roger Y . Tsien 1954 Linus Pauling 2007 Gerhard Ertl 1953 Hermann Staudinger 2006 Roger D . Kornberg 1952 Archer J .P . Martin, Richard L .M . Synge 2005 Yves Chauvin, Robert H . Grubbs, Richard R . Schrock 1951 Edwin M . McMillan, Glenn T . Seaborg 2004 Aaron Ciechanover, Avram Hershko, Irwin Rose 1950 Otto Diels, Kurt Alder 2003 Peter Agre, Roderick MacKinnon 1949 William F . Giauque 2002 John B . Fenn, Koichi Tanaka, Kurt Wüthrich 1948 Arne Tiselius 2001 William S . Knowles, Ryoji Noyori, K . Barry Sharpless 1947 Sir Robert Robinson 2000 Alan Heeger, Alan G . MacDiarmid, Hideki Shirakawa 1946 James B . Sumner, John H . Northrop, Wendell M . Stanley 1999 Ahmed Zewail 1945 Artturi Virtanen 1998 Walter Kohn, John Pople 1944 Otto Hahn 1997 Paul D . Boyer, John E . Walker, Jens C . Skou 1943 George de Hevesy 1996 Robert F . Curl Jr ., Sir Harold Kroto, Richard E . Smalley 1942 No prize awarded 1995 Paul J . Crutzen, Mario J . Molina, F . Sherwood Rowland 1941 No prize awarded 1994 George A . Olah 1940 No prize awarded 1993 Kary B . Mullis, Michael Smith 1939 Adolf Butenandt, Leopold Ruzicka 1992 Rudolph A . Marcus 1938 Richard Kuhn 1991 Richard R . Ernst 1937 Norman Haworth, Paul Karrer 1990 Elias James Corey 1936 Peter Debye 1989 Sidney Altman, Thomas R . Cech 1935 Frédéric Joliot, Irène Joliot-Curie 1988 Johann Deisenhofer, Robert Huber, Hartmut Michel 1934 Harold C . Urey 1987 Donald J . Cram, Jean-Marie Lehn, Charles J .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix the Nobel Prize in Chemistry
    Appendix The Nobel Prize in Chemistry Alfred Bernard Nobel (1833-1896) amassed an enormous fortune from his inventions and improvements in the manufacture of explosives. His father was also an explosives manufacturer, and in 1863 Alfred developed a detonator based on mercury fulminate, which made possible the use of the liquid explosive nitroglycerine. Nobel continued his experiments in spite of an explosion in 1864 that destroyed the factory and killed five people including his younger brother. In 1867 he patented dynamite, in which nitroglycerine was absorbed by the inert solid kieselguhr and was therefore much safer to handle. In 1875 he introduced the more powerful blasting gelatin.e, in which the nitroglycerine was gelatinised with nitrocellulose. These inventions made possible major civil engineering projects like the Corinth canal and the St Gotthard tunnel. In 1887 Nobel introduced ballistite, a smokeless explosive for military use. Nobel hoped that the destructive capabilities of the new explosives would reduce the likelihood of war. Nobel left his fortune for the establishment of five prizes to be awarded annually for achievements in chemistry, physics, physiology or medicine, literature of an idealistic tendency, and the promotion of world peace. The rust awards were made in 1901. The Nobel Prize for Economics was founded in 1968 by the National Bank of Sweden and the rust award was made in 1969. The Nobel Prizes have become the most highly regarded of all international awards. A Prize cannot be shared by more than three people, and cannot be awarded posthumously. A list of the winners of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry is given below.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry for Materials (MAT5002) -Lecture 1 Introduction to Polymer Structures
    Chemistry for Materials (MAT5002) -Lecture 1 Introduction to polymer structures Dr Petra Ágota Szilágyi Engineering #123 Office hour: Thursday 11 am – 12 noon [email protected] Introduction • 5 weeks x 3h per week = 15h of lectures • Lecture on 26/11/2019 cancelled – re-schedule only if necessary • Introduction to polymer structures and mechanisms • Step growth mechanism, polyesters, polyamides, esterification • Chain growth mechanism, free radical mechanism, reaction kinetics • Controlled polymerisation, anionic, cationic, ring opening, controlled radical polymerization • Kinetics of polymerisation reactions • Determination of molar mass of polymers, degradation mechanisms • X-linked polymers, networks, gels, elastomers, gelation point • Revision lectures - TBC • Coursework: Hand in date: 9/12/2019 1 Books • Principles of Polymerisation G Odian • Polymer Synthesis P Rempp and E W Merrill • Polymers: Chemistry & Physics of Modern Materials J M G Cowie • Polymer Chemistry : An Introduction G Challa • Polymer Chemistry Second Edition P Hiemenz and T P Lodge • Introduction to Polymers Third Edition R J Young and P A Lovell 2 E-Books from QMUL library 3 Review articles • Chemical Reviews – Frontiers in Polymer Science thematic issue number 11, 2009. • Kamigaito, M.; Ando, T.; Sawamoto, M. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3689. • Matyjaszewski, K.; Xia, J. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2921. • Hawker, C.; Bosman, A. W.; Harth, E. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3661. • Gridnev, A. A.; Ittel, S. D. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3579. • Barner, L.; Barner-Kowollik, C.; Davis, T. P.; Stenzel, M. H. Aust. J. Chem. 2004, 57, 19-24. • Chiefari, J.; Chong, Y. K.; Ercole, F.; Krstina, J.; Jeffery, J.; Le, T. P. T.; Mayadunne, R. T.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureate Information From
    Dr. John Andraos, http://www.careerchem.com/NAMED/NobelAnecdotes2.pdf 1 Nobel Laureate Anecdotes Part 2 © Dr. John Andraos, 2003 - 2011 Department of Chemistry, York University 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ONTARIO M3J 1P3, CANADA For suggestions, corrections, additional information, and comments please send e-mails to [email protected] http://www.chem.yorku.ca/NAMED/ Source : Hargittai, Istvan The Road to Stockholm: Nobel Prizes, Science, and Scientists , Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2002 Note: This compilation fills in some missing details not given in Hargittai's book. I have also amplified and clarified some ideas presented in the book where appropriate. Used with permission. Growth of Nobel Prize Money 2 VALUE OF NOBEL PRIZE (SEK) 1901 - 2000 9000000 8000000 7000000 6000000 5000000 4000000 3000000 2000000 1000000 0 1901 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 1995 2000 YEAR How Do Nobel Laureates Spend Their Winnings? Albert Einstein (Physics, 1921) used his winnings as part of his divorce settlement from Mileva Maric in 1919. Michael Smith (Chemistry, 1999) donated his winnings to research on schizophrenia, science outreach programs, and the encouragement of women in science. Dorothy H. Crowfoot (Chemistry, 1964) donated her winnings to various charities. Günther Blobel (Medicine, 1999) used his winnings to help in the reconstruction of Dresden, Germany after its destruction in World War II. Philip W. Anderson (Physics, 1977) bought a new family home. Frederick Banting (Medicine, 1923) shared part of his prize money with his graduate student Charles Best and J.J.R. Macleod (Medicine, 1923) shared his part with the biochemist J.B. Collip who found a method of isolating insulin from the islets of Langerhans in pancreas tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science Behind the Nobel Prizes in Medicine and Chemistry Is The
    FRONTIER A MAGAZINE ABOUT ALLIGATOR BIOSCIENCE AND IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY #2, 2018 The science behind the Nobel Prizes in Medicine and Chemistry is the core in Alligator’s research and development FRONTIER – A MAGAZINE ABOUT ALLIGATOR BIOSCIENCE AND IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine has been awarded to: Alligator carries on the legacy 1901 Emil von Behring 1902 Ronald Ross 1903 Niels Ryberg Finsen 1904 Ivan Pavlov of the Nobel Prize winners in 1905 Robert Koch 1906 Camillo Golgi 1907 Alphonse Laveran Medicine and Chemistry . 1908 Ilja Metjnikov Paul Ehrlich 1909 Theodor Kocher On Monday October 1, it was announced that James P. Allison and Tasuku Honjo 1910 Albrecht Kossel 1911 Allvar Gullstrand had been awarded the 2018 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for discov- 1912 Alexis Carrel 1913 Charles Richet eries on immune checkpoints – which according to the Nobel Assembly at the 1914 Robert Bárány 1919 Jules Bordet Karolinska Institute “has revolutionized treatment and changed our view of how 1920 August Krogh 1922 Archibald V. Hill cancers can be treated.” Otto Meyerhof 1923 Frederick G. Banting John Macleod I share the opinion of the Nobel Assembly. 1924 Willem Einthoven 1926 Johannes Fibiger The groundbreaking research by James 1927 Julius Wagner- Jauregg Allison and Tasuku Honjo on how the 1928 Charles Nicolle immune system can be used to fight cancer 1929 Christiaan Eijkman Sir Frederick Hopkins has profoundly changed the therapeutic 1930 Karl Landsteiner 1931 Otto Warburg arena. Not only in terms of how we treat 1932 Sir Charles Sherrington cancer but also on the prospect of surviving Edgar Adrian the disease.
    [Show full text]