L7, Metabolism and Ecology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

L7, Metabolism and Ecology Metabolism in the 1800s • Mahias Jakob Schleiden (1839), Theodor Schwann (1847) introduce cell theory; all organism composed oF cells and their products; believed that cells could crystalize From non living maer. • RudolF Virchow (1857): all cells come From preexisng cells. • Claude Bernard introduced the idea oF homeostasis where organism maintain a steady state inside the cell. Sanctorius Sanctorius 1561–1636. Italian physician, physiologist 30 year experiment. Weighed himselF, and all that he drank and ate. Weighed his Faeces and his urine. - For every 8 pounds he ingested he excreted only 3 pounds waste. - Concluded that much oF what is ingested is lost in perspiraon. Biological ProducOvity Rate oF generaon oF biomass. Primary producOvity–photosynthesis. Secondary/terOary producOvity: consumpon Primary producOvity • Solar energy converted into reducing power (NADPH) (synthesize sugars, etc) and phosphate bonds (ATP) which can be used to power reacOons locally. Early history • Aristotle: plants need Food and get it independently oF animals. The reverse not the case. • Theophrastus: plants Feed through their roots. Jan Baptist van Helmont Flemish 1580 to 1644. Chemist, physiologist, physician • Planted a willow in a pot oF known amount oF soil. • Let the tree grow, weighing the water he applied and the tree’s growth. • Assumed plant growth came From water. Stephen Hales 1677—1761. English botanist, chemist, physiologist, clergyman CareFul studies on transpiraon Charles Bonnet, 1720 to 1793. Swiss naturalist Joseph Priestley 1733 to 1804. English theologian, chemist, philosopher Discoverer of O2. 1774. Focused sunlight on Mercuric Oxide using a magniFying lens: Trapped the gas that resulted as dephlogisOcated air. Antoine Lavoisier. 1743 to 1794. French Chemist • Mixed O2 and H2 and created H20 (using electric spark to start the reacOon) • His quanOtave calculaons allowed him to recognized that water was not a pure element but resulted From the combinaon oF Hydrogen and Oxygen. • Disproved phlogiston “La respiraon est donc une combuson.” • With help oF Laplace, designed a calorimeter. • Using guinea pig as an experimental animal; collected the carbon dioxide released. • Recognized respiraon as a slow combuson. • Showed others the way to study these phenomena. Jan Ingenhousz 1730 to 1799. Dutch Biologist, chemist, physiologist. Plants: give off O2 in light. give off CO2 in dark. More O2 given off than CO2. Concluded that some oF mass oF plants comes From air. Nicolas-Théodore de Saussure. 1767 to 1845. Swiss chemist, plant physiologist What does human producOvity reFer to? • Secondary or terOary producOvity is always net consumpOon. Respiraon • Uptake oF O2 and release oF carbon dioxide in Biological systems. • Bond energy in O2 captured in NADH and ATP; short chain C-compounds used to make larger molecules. • Originally linked to fire. By early 1800 • “Organic” molecules. Many thought specific to liFe and connected with a vital Force. • Increasingly though, experiments showed these to be composed oF smaller elements in strict proporOons. • Photosynthesis and respiraon increasingly seen to be principle metabolic FuncOons in living things. “Modern” concepOon oF metabolism • A collecOon oF reacOons that allow For material exchange between organisms and their environment. • Early concepOons were olen vitalisOc and interpreted the process as involving a liFe force. • “Stoffweschel” oF early 19 century German physiologists. Mahias Jakob Schleiden. 1804 to 1881. Botanist • Microscopic studies showed that plants were composed of cells. • Cell Theory. • Later, a convert to Darwin’s new theory. Theodor Schwann 1810 -1882. German physiologist Worked with Schleiden to develop cell theory. Cells come From other cells. Schwann argued that yeasts were living and were responsible For Fermentaon. Pasteur would later add to this work and confirm it experimentally. Claude Bernard. 1813 to 1878. French Physiologist. Made extensive use oF vivisecOon in his studies. “Mileu interieure”: The living body needs the surrounding environment and yet acts as though it were somewhat independent oF it. Human Ecology. The value oF land • Ricardo (1772 to 1823) English economist. • The FerOlity oF soils is God given; Famines arise when Farmers start to culOvate more and more marginal soils, geng less and less in return. Thomas Robert Malthus 1766 to 1834. English cleric. Malthus proposes: • Human populaon grows exponenOal whereas their Food supply grows only arithmeOcally. • Thus populaon will eventually reach a maximum capacity beyond which it exceeds its Food supply. • Human inequality is the result oF moral Failure on the part oF the poor William Godwin. 1756 to 1836. English PoliOcal philosopher, reFormer. James Anderson. 1739 to 1808. Scosh agricultural economist. • The relave FerOlity oF soils were historically determined and thereFore depended on the nature oF the relaonship oF man to the soil. • Maintenance oF land required raonal sustainable pracOces. Anderson 1801. A calm InvesOgaon oF the circumstances that have led to the present scarcity oF grain in Britain. • Analysed crop FerOlity. • Recognized division oF town and country a significant Factor: manure that would have stayed in the country moved into the city; nutrient lost to soils. • In addiOon, the Thames polluted by human excrement. JusOce von Liebig. 1803 to 1873. German Chemist. Early 1800s in Europe and North America • Widespread and repeated Famines due to crop Failure. • Studied soil Chemistry: “Organic Chemistry in its Applicaon to Agriculture and Physiology” (1840). • Carbon not acquired From soils. • Minerals and nitrogen were soil derived Metabolism originally introduced by German physiologists in early 19th century. • “Stoffweschel’’: material exchange and transFormaon within cells. • Later, Liebig, extended this to include interacOon oF organisms with their environment. Soil inFerOlity • A historical phenomenon created by poor Farming pracOces (Failure to look aer the soil) Karl Marx. 1818 to 1883, German Philosopher, economist, sociologist, etc. Founder oF sustainability theory. Analysed Capitalist producOon. Capital (3 volumes). Put human ecology/sociology into a materialist Framework. Man as an animal • Man depends on nature to meet his physical needs. • Man must produce in order to subsist; human labour was a necessary metabolic exchange between man and nature. • Value came From raw materials and human labour. Federic Clements. 1874 to 1945. American plant ecologist. • Using lamarckian ideas, saw plants and animals as able to transForm themselves • Saw the ecosystem as a superorganism. • Succession would inevitably return the ecosystem to a given Form For the climate/ terrain. Arthur Tansley. 1871 to 1955. English botanist, ecologist • Studied transFormed landscapes. • CriOqued Clements’ interpretaon oF succession and climax; criOcal oF holism • A materialist he saw the ecosystem as the result oF a complex interacOon oF organisms; recognized that such ecosystems could be destroyed American dustbowl, 1930s Eugene Odum. 1913 to 2002. American ecologist .
Recommended publications
  • Matthias Jacob Schleiden (1804–1881) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Matthias Jacob Schleiden (1804–1881) [1] By: Parker, Sara Keywords: cells [2] Matthias Jacob Schleiden helped develop the cell theory in Germany during the nineteenth century. Schleiden studied cells as the common element among all plants and animals. Schleiden contributed to the field of embryology [3] through his introduction of the Zeiss [4] microscope [5] lens and via his work with cells and cell theory as an organizing principle of biology. Schleiden was born in Hamburg, Germany, on 5 April 1804. His father was the municipal physician of Hamburg. Schleiden pursued legal studies at the University of Heidelberg [6] in Heidelberg, Germany, and he graduated in 1827. He established a legal practice in Hamburg, but after a period of emotional depression and an attempted suicide, he changed professions. He studied natural science at the University of Göttingen in Göttingen, Germany, but transferred to the University of Berlin [7] in Berlin, Germany, in 1835 to study plants. Johann Horkel, Schleiden's uncle, encouraged him to study plant embryology [3]. In Berlin, Schleiden worked in the laboratory of zoologistJ ohannes Müller [8], where he met Theodor Schwann. Both Schleiden and Schwann studied cell theory and phytogenesis, the origin and developmental history of plants. They aimed to find a unit of organisms common to the animal and plant kingdoms. They began a collaboration, and later scientists often called Schleiden and Schwann the founders of cell theory. In 1838, Schleiden published "Beiträge zur Phytogenesis" (Contributions to Our Knowledge of Phytogenesis). The article outlined his theories of the roles cells played as plants developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Christian Christian
    Religious Scientists (From the Vatican Observatory Website) https://www.vofoundation.org/faith-and-science/religious-scientists/ Many scientists are religious people—men and women of faith—believers in God. This section features some of the religious scientists who appear in different entries on these Faith and Science pages. Some of these scientists are well-known, others less so. Many are Catholic, many are not. Most are Christian, but some are not. Some of these scientists of faith have lived saintly lives. Many scientists who are faith-full tend to describe science as an effort to understand the works of God and thus to grow closer to God. Quite a few describe their work in science almost as a duty they have to seek to improve the lives of their fellow human beings through greater understanding of the world around them. But the people featured here are featured because they are scientists, not because they are saints (even when they are, in fact, saints). Scientists tend to be creative, independent-minded and confident of their ideas. We also maintain a longer listing of scientists of faith who may or may not be discussed on these Faith and Science pages—click here for that listing. Agnesi, Maria Gaetana (1718-1799) Catholic Christian A child prodigy who obtained education and acclaim for her abilities in math and physics, as well as support from Pope Benedict XIV, Agnesi would write an early calculus textbook. She later abandoned her work in mathematics and physics and chose a life of service to those in need. Click here for Vatican Observatory Faith and Science entries about Maria Gaetana Agnesi.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Atomism and Cell Theory
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (2010) 202–211 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsc Biological atomism and cell theory Daniel J. Nicholson ESRC Research Centre for Genomics in Society (Egenis), University of Exeter, Byrne House, St. Germans Road, Exeter EX4 4PJ, UK article info abstract Keywords: Biological atomism postulates that all life is composed of elementary and indivisible vital units. The activ- Biological atomism ity of a living organism is thus conceived as the result of the activities and interactions of its elementary Cell theory constituents, each of which individually already exhibits all the attributes proper to life. This paper sur- Organismal theory veys some of the key episodes in the history of biological atomism, and situates cell theory within this Reductionism tradition. The atomistic foundations of cell theory are subsequently dissected and discussed, together with the theory’s conceptual development and eventual consolidation. This paper then examines the major criticisms that have been waged against cell theory, and argues that these too can be interpreted through the prism of biological atomism as attempts to relocate the true biological atom away from the cell to a level of organization above or below it. Overall, biological atomism provides a useful perspective through which to examine the history and philosophy of cell theory, and it also opens up a new way of thinking about the epistemic decomposition of living organisms that significantly departs from the phys- icochemical reductionism of mechanistic biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS (A) FOR THE YEAR 1894. A. Arc spectrum of electrolytic ,iron on the photographic, 983 (see Lockyer). B. Bakerian L ecture.—On the Relations between the Viscosity (Internal 1 riction) of Liquids and then Chemical Nature, 397 (see T iiorpe and R odger). Bessemer process, the spectroscopic phenomena and thermo-chemistry of the, 1041 IIarimo). C. Capstick (J. W.). On the Ratio of the Specific Heats of the Paraffins, and their Monohalogei.. Derivatives, 1. Carbon dioxide, on the specific heat of, at constant volume, 943 (sec ). Carbon dioxide, the specific heat of, as a function of temperatuie, ddl (mo I j . , , Crystals, an instrument of precision for producing monochromatic light of any desire. ua\e- eng », * its use in the investigation of the optical properties of, did (see it MDCCCXCIV.— A. ^ <'rystals of artificial preparations, an instrument for grinding section-plates and prisms of, 887 (see Tutton). Cubic surface, on a special form of the general equation of a, and on a diagram representing the twenty- seven lines on the surface, 37 (see Taylor). •Cables, on plane, 247 (see Scott). D. D unkeelky (S.). On the Whirling and Vibration of Shafts, 279. Dynamical theory of the electric and luminifei’ous medium, a, 719 (see Larmor). E. Eclipse of the sun, April 16, 1893, preliminary report on the results obtained with the prismatic cameras during the total, 711 (see Lockyer). Electric and luminiferous medium, a dynamical theory of the, 719 (see Larmor). Electrolytic iron, on the photographic arc spectrum of, 983 (see Lockyer). Equation of the general cubic surface, 37 (see Taylor).
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Transactions (A)
    INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS (A) FOR THE YEAR 1889. A. A bney (W. de W.). Total Eclipse of the San observed at Caroline Island, on 6th May, 1883, 119. A bney (W. de W.) and T horpe (T. E.). On the Determination of the Photometric Intensity of the Coronal Light during the Solar Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363. Alcohol, a study of the thermal properties of propyl, 137 (see R amsay and Y oung). Archer (R. H.). Observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of Extension of the Coronal Streamers at Hog Island, Grenada, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382. Atomic weight of gold, revision of the, 395 (see Mallet). B. B oys (C. V.). The Radio-Micrometer, 159. B ryan (G. H.). The Waves on a Rotating Liquid Spheroid of Finite Ellipticity, 187. C. Conroy (Sir J.). Some Observations on the Amount of Light Reflected and Transmitted by Certain 'Kinds of Glass, 245. Corona, on the photographs of the, obtained at Prickly Point and Carriacou Island, total solar eclipse, August 29, 1886, 347 (see W esley). Coronal light, on the determination of the, during the solar eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363 (see Abney and Thorpe). Coronal streamers, observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382 (see A rcher). Cosmogony, on the mechanical conditions of a swarm of meteorites, and on theories of, 1 (see Darwin). Currents induced in a spherical conductor by variation of an external magnetic potential, 513 (see Lamb). 520 INDEX.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comedy of Scientific Errors BOVINES
    SACRED A COMEDY OF SCIENTIFIC ERRORS BOVINES DOUGLAS ALLCHIN, DEPARTMENT EDITOR William Shakespeare may well have foreshadowed the modern television experiment with balm, groundsel, and spinach. All modified the air to sitcom. His comic misadventures were expertly crafted. In A Comedy of support sustained burning. Animals, too, could breathe longer in the Errors, for example, twins (with twin servants), each separated at birth, treated air. Plants, Priestley had found, could restore the “goodness” of converge unbeknownst to each other in the same town. Mistaken iden- the air depleted by respiration or combustion. American correspondent tity leads to miscommunication. More mistaken identity follows, with Benjamin Franklin immediately perceived the global implications: plants more misdelivered messages and yet more misinterpretations. Hilarious help restore the atmosphere that humans and other animals foul. The consequences ensue. It is a stock comedic formula in modern entertain- system ensures our survival. That view fit neatly with Priestley’s religious ment. A character first makes an unintentional error. Then ironically, in belief in an intentionally designed (and rational) natural world. It was a trying to correct it, things only get laughably worse. remarkable discovery. For this and other work on airs, the Royal Society Science, we imagine, is safeguarded against such embarrassing in 1772 awarded Priestley the Copley Medal, then the most prestigious episodes. In the lore of scientists, echoed among teachers, science is honor in science. “self-correcting.” Replication, in particular, ensures that errors are Others were eager to build on Priestley’s discovery about plants and exposed for what they are. Research promptly returns to its fruitful tra- the restoration of air.
    [Show full text]
  • Eduard Uhlenhuth/Anatomy Department Library
    Dr. Eduard Uhlenhuth Papers Item Type Other Authors Wink, Tara Publication Date 2020-12-11 Abstract Dr. Eduard Uhlenhuth was a professor of Anatomy at the University of Maryland School of Medicine from 1925 until his retirement in 1955. In 1957 he was named professor emeritus. He was an avid book collector amassing an extensive collection of Anatom... Keywords Uhlenhuth, Eduard; Department of Anatomy; Anatomical Book Collection; Anatomy; Anatomy--education; Anatomists; University of Maryland, Baltimore; University of Maryland, Baltimore. School of Medicine; Medical education Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Download date 28/09/2021 04:39:25 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10713/14245 Eduard Uhlenhuth/Anatomy Department Library Title Author Date Found in Cat Notes De Medicina Aulus Cornelius Celsus 1497 Cordell Coll "On Medicine" Matthaei Curtii…In Mundini Anatomen Commentarius Elegans & Docties Mondino dei Luzzi 1551 Cordell Coll De conceptu et generatione hominis : et iis quae circa hȩc potissimum consyderantur, libri sex Jakob Rueff 1554 Cordell Coll "On Conception and Generation in Man" Gabrielis Falloppii medici Mutinensis Obseruationes anatomicae Gabriel Fallopius/Falloppio 1562 Cordell Coll Theatrum anatomicum Caspar Bauhin 1605 Cordell Coll 1st ed. De lactibus sive lacteis venis Gaspare Aselli 1627 Cordell Coll Syntagma anatomicum Johann Vesling 1647 Cordel Coll Corporis hvmani disqvisitio anatomica Nathaniel Highmore 1651 Cordell Coll
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Preservice Biology Teachers‟ Skills in the Causal Process Concerning Photosynthesis
    Journal of Education and Training Studies Vol. 7, No. 4; April 2019 ISSN 2324-805X E-ISSN 2324-8068 Published by Redfame Publishing URL: http://jets.redfame.com Development of Preservice Biology Teachers‟ Skills in the Causal Process Concerning Photosynthesis Arzu Saka Correspondence: Arzu Saka, Trabzon University, Fatih Faculty of Education, Trabzon, 61335,Turkey. Received: February 12, 2019 Accepted: March 7, 2019 Online Published: March 11, 2019 doi:10.11114/jets.v7i4.4022 URL: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i4.4022 Abstract Photosynthesis is the most effective cycle and sustainable natural process known in nature. Students who learn the subject of photosynthesis well will also make better sense of other issues such as environmental problems, the state of the atmosphere, greenhouse gases, climate changes, carbon footprints and conservation of forests. The aim of this study is to present an example of a worksheet that investigates the skill levels possessed by preservice teachers‟ in the causal process, and also to examine their ability to write a photosynthesis equation by means of a history-based approach that also includes reading skills. The study was conducted with the action research method. The study sample consisted of a total of 71 preservice biology teachers. At the first stage, before the implementation of the worksheet, 34 teacher candidates from within the sample were asked a question with a diagram summarising the photosynthesis process. At the second stage, all the prospective teachers were asked for the skill levels they possessed in the causal process to be assessed via implementation of the worksheet. The answers given by the preservice teachers in the defining variables section in particular make up the least answered section of the worksheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter (PDF)
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. (B.) FOR THE YEAR MDCCCLXXXVII. VOL. 178. LONDON: PRINTED BY HARRISON AND SONS, ST. MARTIN’S LANE, W C., printers in Ordinary to Her Majesty. MDCCCLXXXVIII. ADVERTISEMENT. The Committee appointed by the Royal Society to direct the publication of the Philosophical Transactions take this opportunity to acquaint the public that it fully appears, as well from the Council-books and Journals of the Society as from repeated declarations which have been made in several former , that the printing of them was always, from time to time, the single act of the respective Secretaries till the Forty-seventh Volume; the Society, as a Body, never interesting themselves any further in their publication than by occasionally recommending the revival of them to some of their Secretaries, when, from the particular circumstances of their affairs, the Transactions had happened for any length of time to be intermitted. And this seems principally to have been done with a view to satisfy the public that their usual meetings were then continued, for the improvement of knowledge and benefit of mankind : the great ends of their first institution by the Boyal Charters, and which they have ever since steadily pursued. But the Society being of late years greatly enlarged, and their communications more numerous, it was thought advisable that a Committee of their members should be appointed to reconsider the papers read before them, and select out of them such as. they should judge most proper for publication in the future Transactions; which was accordingly done upon the 26th of March, 1752.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Photosynthesis Jan Ingenhousz Experiment John
    Cause / Effect TM This… Caused… Led To… Box-frame . Makes Sense Strategies © 2007 Edwin Ellis, All Rights© 2007 Reserved Edwin Published Ellis, byAll Makes Rights Sense Reserved Strategies, LLC, www.MakesSenseStrategies.com Lillian, AL www.MakesSenseStrategies.com MENU sample Name: Date: Discovery of Photosynthesis Is about … how the experiments of Van Helmont, Priestley, and Ingenhousz reveal that in the presence of light, plants transform C2O and H2O into carbohydrates and release O2. This Caused the… Which led to … Van Helmont John Priestly Jan Ingenhousz experiment experiment experiment · Led to the discovery of the · Led to the discovery of the · Led to the discovery that “hydrate,” or water portion of oxygen portion of the plants need light to produce the carbohydrate produced photosynthesis equation oxygen by photosynthesis · Placed a lit candle inside a jar, · Performed Priestly’s · Created and experiment to it burned out. Then, he place a experiment and discovered find out if plants grew by mint leaf inside the jar and that the candle only remained taking material out of the soil the candle remained lit lighted in the presence of – massed dry soil and a small because of the production of light seed, after five years the oxygen by the leaf mass of the soil was the sameèconcluded that the mass of the plant gained came from the water, did not realize air changed it too So what? What is important to understand about this? Photosynthesis is a series of reactions that uses energy from the sun to convert water and carbon dioxide into sugars and oxygen .
    [Show full text]
  • The Cell Theory Notes
    The Cell Theory Notes 1. Many important scientists aided in the discovery of the cell and the formulation of the cell theory. Scientist Contribution Zacharias Janssen Anton Von Leeuwenhoek Robert Hooke Matthias Schleiden Theodor Schwann Rudolf Virchow The Cell Theory 1 2. The Cell Theory a. all organisms are made of b. are the basic units of structure and function for all things c. All cells come from other _. Match the scientist with the correct letter stating his contribution to cell discovery. 1. Zacharias Janssen A German histologist that concluded all cells come from other cells 2. Rudolf Virchow B German physiologist that concluded all animals are made of cells 3. Robert Hooke C Came up with the word "cell" after studying cork under the microscope 4. Theodor Schwann D German botanist who concluded that all plants are made of cells 5. Anton Von Leeuwenhoek E Dutch tradesman who made the first simple microscope 6. Matthias Schleiden F Dutch scientist that built a compound microscope with his father. All living things, plant or animal, have one thing in common. Which of the following is the common thing? A They all have cells that are held up by cell walls. B They all have the same way to get water and food into their cells. C They all have cells. D They all have special cells that can do many different things. In all living things, the presence of what structure supports the cell theory. A cell wall B cell membrane C vacuole D chloroplast 4 The Cell Theory One of the most important general However, the credit for pulling it all together principles in the science of biology is the usually goes to a pair of German scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Senebier's Thoughts on Experimentation
    | Jean Senebier’s thoughts on experimentation and their relevance for today’s researcher | 185 | Jean Senebier’s thoughts on experimentation and their relevance for today’s researcher Edward E. FARMER * Ms. received the 22nd April 2010, accepted the 10th September 2010 T Abstract How are observation and experimentation related to one another? Jean Senebier (1742-1809) tackled this question in his philosophical works on The Art of Observing. However, Senebier was not only a theoretician and, not long after his first publications on observation, his own experiments contributed to resolve a major question in biology: what do the leaves of plants feed on? By analysing Senebier’s works on science theory in parallel with those reporting his scientific discoveries, this article shows that The Art of Observing series is not restricted to observation and contains deep insights into the process of experimenting with living organisms. Keywords: Senebier, plant physiology, photosynthesis, science didactics, epistemology T Résumé Les considérations de Jean Senebier sur l’expérimentation et leur intérêt pour les chercheurs d’aujourd’hui. – Quel est le lien entre l’observation et l’expérimentation? Jean Senebier (1742-1809) a abordé cette question dans sa série d’ouvrages sur l’Art d’observer. Cependant, Senebier n’était pas seulement un théoricien et, peu après ses premières publi - cations sur l’observation, il a commencé à travailler sur l’une des grandes questions de la biologie: « de quoi se nourrissent les feuilles des plantes? » S’appuyant sur ce qu’il avait appris en tant qu’expérimentaliste, Senebier a par la suite été en mesure d’approfondir ses brillantes analyses présentées dans ses deux premières publications sur l’Art d’observer.
    [Show full text]