Economic Effects of Metallic Corrosion in the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Effects of Metallic Corrosion in the United States A11103 Qbbbe3 NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION 511-2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of Standards rnpRn^JiON IN THE UNITED STATES (Appendix B) A Report to NBS by 3ttpMA CotMmhii«; laboratories ^1 ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF METALLIC CORROSION IN THE UNITED STATES - - - A Three Part Study for Congress - - - NBS Special Publication 511-1. Economic Effects of Metallic Corrosion in the United States. A Report to Congress by the National Bureau of Standards. (Inc- luding Appendix A, Estimate of Uncertainty). SD Stock No. SN-003-003-0 1926-7. Price $2.30. NBS Special Publication 511-2. Economic Effects of Metallic Corrosion in the United States. Appendix B. A Report to NBS by Battelle Columbus Laboratories. SD Stock No. SN-003-003-01927-5. Price $4.25. Order these two publications by SD Stock No. from U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DC 20402 NBS GCR78-122. Battelle Columbus Laboratories Input/Output Tables. Ap- pendix C of "Economic Effects of Metallic Corrosion in the United States". Order this report by PB-279 430 from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, Price $21.50. OV STANDARDS hlBRA RY viUL 1 q 1978 ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF METALLIC .u^, ^ CORROSION IN THE UNITED STATES-Appendix B Part II A Report to NBS by Battelle Columbus Laboratories J.H. Payer, D.G. Dippold, W.K. Boyd, W.E. Berry, E.W. Brooman, A.R. Buhr, and W.H. Fisher Battelle Columbus Laboratories 505 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43201 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary Dr. Sidney Harman, Under Secretary Jordan J. Baruch, Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology U NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Director • • . Issued May 1978 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 78-600033 National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 511-2 Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Spec. Publ. 5li-2, 249 pages (May 1978) CODEN; XNBSAV U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1978 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 SD Stock No. 003-003-01927-5 Price $4.25 (Add 25 percent additional for other than U.S. mailing). FOREWORD From the beginning of formal discussions on this study in the fall of 1976, many people and organizations were contacted. Through them the information necessary to estimate effects of corrosion was gathered. The cooperation from industry, government, professional societies, and trade organizations was excellent. All corrosion effects were expressed as changes to coefficients and elements in the Corrosion Input/Output Model. Supportive material for cost estimates reported here, i.e.. Input /Output Tables, and a compilation of all adjustments for corrosion effects with their cause, are on file at Battelle's Columbus Laboratories and copies were sent to the National Bureau of Standards. An advisory Panel participated throughout the study: Dr. Seymour L. Blum The MITRE Corporation Mr. C. P. Dillon C.P. Dillon and Associates Dr. Mars G. Fontana Materials Technology Institute of the Chemical Process Industries, Inc. Dr. E. W. Haycock Shell Development Corporation Mr. Howard Jelinek/Dr. Richard Priest Sears, Roebuck and Company Mr. Tom F. Kearns Naval Air Systems Command Dr. Tom Passell/Dr. Ed Zebroski Electric Power Research Institute Dr. E. H. Phelps U.S. Steel Corporation Mr . L . C . Rowe General Motors Corporation Their valuable contributions, review, and guidance are gratefully acknowledged Significant contributions were made by Dr . E. B. Berman of the MITRE Corporation, who was an economic consultant to National Bureau of Standards for this study. iii The National Bureau of Standards staff actively participated in many aspects of the study, including the preliminary planning, definitions, and the data gathering efforts. Dr. L. H. Bennett, Dr. J. Kruger, Dr. E. Passaglia, and Dr. H. Yakowitz are specifically acknowledged for their worthy contributions. Also contributing from NBS were J. Ambrose, Y. Bertocci, J. Carroll, B. Christ, E. Escalante, W. Gerhold, A. Melmed, F. Ogburn, R. Parker, C. Reimeinn, A. Ruff, G. Ugiansky and J. Young. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 BACKGROUND 6 2.1 Impact of Corrosion on U.S. Economy 6 2.2 Approach to Determination of Costs of Corrosion 7 2.3 Principal Concepts 8 2.3.1 Definition of Cost of Corrosion 8 2.3.2 Elements of the Cost of Corrosion 9 2.3.2.1 Replacement of Equipment and Buildings 9 2.3.2.2 Loss of Product 10 2.3.2.3 Maintenance and Repair 10 2.3.2.4 Excess Capacity 10 2.3.2.5 Redundant Equipment 10 2.3.2.6 Corrosion Control 10 2.3.2.7 Technical Report 10 2.3.2.8 Design 10 2.3.2.9 Insurance 11 2.3.2.10 Parts and Equipment Inventory 11 2.3.3 Avoidable and Unavoidable Costs 11 2.3.4 Best Corrosion Control Practice 12 2.3.5 Input/Output Analysis 12 2.3.6 Direct and Indirect Costs 13 2.3.7 World I, World II, and World III 13 2.3.8 Ex-Ante Approach for Estimation 13 3 METHODOLOGY 14 3.1 Introduction 14 3.2 Assumptions 16 3.2.1 Linearity Assumption 16 3.2.2 Homogeneous Product Assumption . 16 3.2.3 Inelasticity of Substitution Assumption 17 3.2.4 Steady Growth Assumption 17 3.2.5 Average Technology 17 3.2.6 Full Employment Assumption 17 3.3 The "A" Matrix 17 3.3.1 Value Added 18 3.3.2 Social Savings 18 3.3.3 Foreign Trade 19 3.3.4 Disaggregations 20 3.3.5 The Ex Ante Approach 21 3.4 Capital Matrix 22 3.4.1 The General Concept of the Capital Module 22 3.4.2 The B-Matrix 24 3.4.3 The Growth Matrix 25 3.4.4 The Replacement Matrix 26 V TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 3.4.5 The Modified Dynamic Inverse 27 3.4.6 The Final Capital Matrices 28 3.5 Final Demands 28 3.5.1 Generation of Stipulated Final Demands (FD) 29 3.5.1.1 Composition of GNP 29 3.5.1.2 The Consumption Module 29 3.5.1.3 Other Final Demands 31 3.5.1.4 Inventory Change 32 3.5.2 Disaggregations 32 3.5.3 Durable Goods 33 3.6 Specific Industry Cost Parameters 34 3.6.1 Direct Cost of Corrosion Per Unit of Output 35 3.6.1.1 Value-Added Adjustments 36 3.6.2 Total Direct Costs of Corrosion 37 3.6.3 Direct and Indirect per Unit Costs of Corrosion .... 38 3.6.4 Total Direct and Indirect Costs of Corrosion 39 4 DETERMINATION OF COSTS OF CORROSION . 40 4.1 Data Gathering Procedure 40 4.2 Procedure for Coefficient Determination 43 4.2.1 Replacement of Equipment or Buildings 43 4.2.2 Loss of Product 46 4.2.3 Maintenance and Repair 46 4.2.3.1 Maintenance and Repair Construction 49 4.2.3.2 Maintenance and Repair Equipment 50 4.2.4 Excess Capacity 53 4.2.5 Redundant Equipment 54 4.2.6 Corrosion Control 54 4.2.6.1 Corrosion Inhibitors and Water Treatment .... 54 4.2.6.2 Organic and Metallic Coatings and Platings ... 55 4.2.6.3 Cathodic Protection 56 4.2.7 Research and Development, Engineering and Other Technical Support 58 4.2.8 Design 60 4.2.9 Insurance 61 4.2.10 Parts and Equipment Inventory 61 4.3 Avoidable Costs of Corrosion-Best Corrosion Control Practice 62 4.3.1 Approach Adopted for Avoidable Costs 63 4.3.2 Treatment of Avoidable Costs in I/O Model 63 4.4 Description of Industry by Industry Coefficient Adjustments 67 4.4.1 Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery 67 4.4.2 Extraction of Mineral Resources 68 4.4.2.1 Solid Minerals 68 4.4.2.2 Gas and Oil 69 4.4.3 Manufacture of Food, Leather, and Textile Products. 70 4.4.4 Wood and Paper Products 71 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 4.4.5 Petroleum and Chemical Products 72 4.4.6 Stone, Clay, and Glass Products 75 4.4.7 Primary Ferrous Metals and Manufacturers 76 4.4.8 Primary Non-Ferrous Metals and Manufacturers 78 4.4.9 Fabricated Metal Products 79 4.4.10 General Machinery and Components 80 4.4.11 Specialized Machinery 81 4.4.12 Motor Vehicles and Miscellaneous Transportation Equipment 82 4.4.13 Aircraft and Air Transportation 84 4.4.14 Water Transportation Services and Equipment 86 4.4.15 Railroad and Equipment Related Services 88 4.4.16 General Electrical Apparatus 90 4.4.17 Special Electrical Apparatus 91 4.4.18 Scientific and Measuring Devices 92 4.4.19 Business Machines and Supplies 93 4.4.20 Miscellaneous Manufacturers 94 4.4.21 Highway Passenger Transport, Motor Freight and Warehousing, and Transportation Services 95 4.4.22 Pipelines 96 4.4.23 Public Utilities 97 4.4.23.1 Telecommunication 97 4.4.23.2 Electric Power 98 4.4.23.3 Gas 98 4.4.23.4 Water and Sanitary Services 99 4.4.24 Construction 100 4.4.25 Trade and Business Services 103 4.4.26 Other Services 104 4.4.27 Government Enterprise-Post Office 104 4.4.28 Final Demands 105 4.4.28.1 Changes in Non-Durable Goods 105 4.4.28.2 Adjustments to Durable Goods 107 5 COSTS OF CORROSION: ANALYSES OF RESULTS 108 5.1 Quantification of Total Costs 108 5.2 Sectoral Attributions of Costs 109 5.2.1 Industry Indicators and Examples of Their Use 109 5.2.2 Analysis of Industry Indicators 115 5.2.3 Costs of Corrosion for Components of Final Demand .
Recommended publications
  • Ahead of the Rest
    2016 2017 Ahead of the Rest Welcome to our proud “Family of Products” Merging Finger Lakes, Castle, Econo, and Echo into one catalog displays www.CastleOctaServices.com America’s broadest line of professional products. Decades of research and development have helped us create a deep, multi-dimensional line. Five reasons why the Castle Group is your best value: PROFITS 1 Since 1967 our trademarked packaging and patented formulas have given exciting new profit opportunities. SUPPORT 2 Service menus, training seminars, POP displays, radio and TV tags, and apparel. FACTORY DIRECT 3 Strategically placed satellite warehouses provide service with no freight and no minimum. Battery HI-TECH Service 4 Product Technical Info is constantly updated. We help you satisfy your “User Right to Know” responsibilities! SAFETY 5 We help you comply with government regulations. The Castle Racing Team started in the early 1970’s with the inception of the Castle Dragon Fire Dragster. Over the years Castle cars and crews have been spotted at drag strips, dirt tracks, and asphalt circuits: 1980’s: J.D. McDuffie uses Castle in his shop and Castle on his #70 Pontiac in the Winston Cup Series. 2002 – 05: Castle unveils its “Racing for Clean Air” Campaign, with Andy Santerre as Racing Team Captain. Andy was NASCAR Busch North Series (BNS) Rookie-of-the-Year in 1993 and NASCAR Busch Series Rookie-of-the-Year in 1998. Santerre would go on to win four straight BNS Points Championships (2002-2005). 2006: Andy retires from racing to concentrate on building race cars and tutoring young drivers as Andy Santerre Motorsports (ASM).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0290802 A1 Morita Et Al
    US 201402908O2A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0290802 A1 Morita et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 2, 2014 (54) SURFACE TREATMENT METHOD AND (30) Foreign Application Priority Data COATING METHOD FOR STEEL MATERIAL, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING MACHINE Oct. 25, 2011 (JP) ................................. 2011-234331 COMPONENT Publication Classification (51) Int. Cl. (75) Inventors: Haruji Morita, Hanno-shi (JP); Tsuneo C23C 8/42 (2006.01) Tate, Setagaya-ku (JP); Akira C23C 8/80 (2006.01) Shiozawa, Okaya-shi (JP) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC. C23C 8/42 (2013.01); C23C 8/80 (2013.01) (73) Assignees: KOMATSU LTD., Tokyo (JP); USPC ........................................... 148/241; 148/253 NIPPON KAZAI CO.,LTD., Okaya-shi, Nagano (JP); COTEC (57) ABSTRACT CORPORATION, Tokyo (JP) This Surface treatment method comprises a rustproofing step, a rinsing step, and a cleaning step. In the rustproofing step, a (21) Appl. No.: 14/350,724 rustproofing liquid containing orthophosphoric acid and an organic acid is used to perform a rustproofing treatment on the (22) PCT Filed: Sep. 12, 2012 Surface of a steel material. In the rinsing step, a treatment 9 liquid containing an oxoacid salt of a transition metal is used to perform a rinsing treatment on the Surface of the Steel (86). PCT No.: PCT/UP2012/073363 material. In the cleaning step, the Surface of the steel material S371 (c)(1), that has undergone the rinsing step is subjected to a cleaning (2), (4) Date: Apr. 9, 2014 treatment. (a) Shape of film formed by this surface treatment method (SEM, x10,000) Patent Application Publication Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrosion Resistance of Hot-Dip Zn-6%Al-3%Mg Alloy Coated Steel Sheet Used in Automotive Parts
    Corrosion resistance of hot-dip Zn-6%Al-3%Mg alloy coated steel sheet used in automotive parts Masaaki Uranaka, Takeshi Shimizu – Nishhin Steel, Osaka, Japan ABSTRACT RIASSUNTO For the purpose of applying hot-dip Zn-6%Al-3%Mg alloy Con lo scopo di applicare il rivestimento “Zn-Al-Mg” sui coated steel sheet (“Zn-Al-Mg”) to automotive parts, we laminati di acciaio per componenti di autoveicoli, mediante compared and investigated the corrosion resistance of Zn- “immersione a caldo” nel bagno della lega Zn-6%Al- Al-Mg and ordinary materials treated using a conventional 3Mg, gli Autori hanno studiato la resistenza a corrosione rustproofing method (“post-Zn-coated material”) exposed del rivestimento “Zn-Al-Mg” confrontandola con quella to accelerated corrosion test environments. We also dei materiali comuni trattati con metodi convenzionali di collected automotive parts made from Zn-Al-Mg from protezione alla corrosione (rivestimento di Zn) esposti vehicles that had been driven for three to five years in a test ambientali di corrosione accelerata. Sono state Canada to examine corrosion resistance capabilities when anche prelevate parti ricoperte con Zn-Al-Mg da veicoli exposed to actual vehicle environment conditions. We guidati da 3 a 5 anni in Canada, con lo scopo di valutare found that Zn-Al-Mg exhibited better corrosion resistance le prestazioni di resistenza alla corrosione quando sono than post-Zn-coated material, even at portions where the esposte alle condizioni ambientali di esercizio. Gli autori steel substrate was exposed (along cut edges and in bent hanno trovato che il rivestimento Zn-Al-Mg mostra migliore or spot-welded portions).
    [Show full text]
  • FED-STD-297E T SUPERSEDING FED-STD-297D October 1
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com FED-STD-297E t SUPERSEDING FED-STD-297D October 1. 1985 FEDERAL STANDARD RUSTPROOFINGOF COMMERCIAL (NONTACZICAL)VEHICLES ~. Approved fo~ pu~l.icrelease: distribution is unlimited. ,,- -~ -. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com FED-STB297E GENERAL SERVICES AIMINISTRATION Washington. D- C. 20301 Rustproofing of Commercial (Nontactical)Vehicles. 1. This Federal Standard is approved by the Commissioner, Federal Supply Service. General Services Administration. for the use of all Federal Agencies. 2. Beneficial comments (recommendations?additions. deletions) ~d my pertinent data which may be of use in improving this document should be addressed to: US Army Tank-Automotive Conmand, A’I’TN:AMSTA-UED, Warren. MI 48397-5000. by using the self-addressed Standardization Document Improvement proposal (.DD~orm 1426) appearti at the end ‘f ‘his ‘ocment ‘r W letter- ii Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com FRD=STD-Z9’7E FOREWRD This standard establishes requirements for rustproofing of commercial. nontactical, self-propelled and towed vehicles procured for Government use. ------ iii Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com FED-STW297E Paragraph 1.. SCOPE -------------- ------- 1 2. REFERENCEDDOCUMENTS . ---- ------- 2 2.1 Issues of documents . ---’ ------ 2 2.1.1 Government documents . - - - - . - - - 2 2.1.2 Other Government documents . - . - - -’- 2 3. DEFINITIONS ----------- ------ 3 4. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .’----- ------- 4 4.1 I?ustproofing---------- ------- 4 .4.2 Identification -------- -------- 4 4.3 Materials ---------- --” ------ 4 4.4 Instructions . ---- -------- 4-5 4.5 Contractor inspection system . - . 5 4.6 Workmanship ---------- ------- 5 5. DETAILED ------------ ------- 5 5.1 Application equipment - . - . - - . - - - - 5 5.1-1 Spray gun ---------- -------- 5 5.1.2 Wands ------------- ------” 6 5.1.3 Spray nozzles . .. ---- -------- 6 5.2 Application procedure .
    [Show full text]
  • Selder & Company Ab
    Page 1 of 3 SELDER & COMPANY AB WORK MANUAL FOR RUSTPROOFING OIL www.selder.com 23.3.2021 The work differs significantly from that with other rustproofing oils. READ CAREFULLY FOR A GOOD RESULT. TABLE OF CONTENTS CLEAN, NON-CORRODED METAL SURFACES TO BE PAINTED .............................................................. 1 CORRODED (RUSTED) METAL SURFACES, TREATMENT WITH OIL AT ROOM TEMPERATURE ................ 1 LINSEED OIL BURNING OF IRON AND STEEL .......................................................................................... 2 MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................................................... 2 GENERAL................................................................................................................................................. 2 WORKER PROTECTION ........................................................................................................................... 3 SAFETY ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 CLEAN, NON-CORRODED METAL SURFACES TO BE PAINTED are automatically rustproofed by painting with Selder's linseed oil paints. Half of them is a binder which has the same composition and properties as RUSTPROOFING OIL. CORRODED (RUSTED) METAL SURFACES, TREATMENT WITH OIL AT ROOM TEMPERATURE Remove loose rust, paint residue, grease, lichens, algae, etc. The surface can be burned off with a blow torch,
    [Show full text]
  • Circular of the Bureau of Standards No. 80: Protective Metallic Coatings For
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Circular Bureau of Standards protective metallic coatings for the RUSTPROOFING OF IRON AND STEEL DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Circular OF THE Bureau of Standards S. W. STRATTON, Director No. 80 PROTECTIVE METALLIC COATINGS FOR THE RUSTPROOFING OF IRON AND STEEL ISSUED OCTOBER 4, 1919 PRICE, 10 CENTS Sold only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1919 ) 1 PROTECTIVE METALLIC COATINGS FOR THE RUSTPROOFING OF IRON AND STEEL CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 4 1. Nature of corrosion 4 2 . Principles underlying methods of prevention of corrosion 4 II. Types of coatings and methods of application 6 1. Metallic coatings 6 () Zinc 6 Hot dipping, sherardizing, plating, etc 6 Comparison of coatings 6 () Aluminum 7 (c) Soft, fusible metals 8 Tin, lead, and their alloys 8 (d) Hard metals 8 Copper, nickel, cobalt, and brass 8 2. Oxides and salts of iron 9 (a) Oxides 9 Bower-Barff type 9 Heating with oil, etc 10 ** “ Etching (“ Browning, Bluing, ” etc.) 10 Niter bath n Temper colors 11 Hot oxidizing solutions 1 Miscellaneous n (&) Salts 12 Parker or Coslett process 12 III. Microstructure 12 1. Theoretical microstructure of zinc coatings 12 2. Variations in microstructure of commercial coatings 14 (a) Hot-dipped material 14 ( b ) Sherardized coatings 16 (c) Sprayed coatings 16 ( d Plated zinc coatings 17 3. Significance of structure of coatings 18 IV. Preparation of the surface before coating, and accompanying effects upon the mechanical properties of the steel 20 V. Methods of testing coatings 22 1. Description of methods 22 () Stripping tests 23 () Salt spray 24 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrosion Protection Textbook
    Corrosion Protection Textbook Version:3.3 ©2001-2014Inter-IndustryConferenceOnAutoCollisionRepair CPS01-STMAN1-E Thispageisintentionallyleftblank. Textbook CorrosionProtection Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................7 ObligationsToTheCustomerAndLiability.......................................................................... 7 Module1-CorrosionOriginsAndPrevention.......................................................................13 CausesOfCorrosion...........................................................................................................13 OEMCorrosionProtection..................................................................................................14 PreventingCorrosionDuringRepairs..................................................................................19 ModuleWrap-Up............................................................................................................... 26 Module2-CorrosionProtectionDuringRepairs................................................................... 29 Cleaning..............................................................................................................................29 PartPreparations................................................................................................................. 31 JoiningSurfaces.................................................................................................................. 33 Primers................................................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Circular 192: Corrosion Resistance of Iron and Steel
    • - - Letter HWG : MGL : LTQ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE " " ' \ BDREAU- -Op’S OTfDARDS Circular : •..- ~ ™ • 1&2 ’ ' • ' v • 7 • April 1336 ' • v ; yc-^s. ' COFRQSIQN- RESISTANCE ~CF "IRON AND STEEL . ; : • • •. V ; -a; . The /Lett-er- C.iTC.uliars are designed to answer .specific in- ; quiries and at the same.; t irae- to-'obylate .the necessity "for pre^ paratlon.-of a large number. of letters- on. .the same, subject There Is" no guarantee- it hat .the. 'Information .given In- the Letter r Circulars- ls , correct except as of .the date of issue,. - ilat-erlal of a permanent value appears in- the printed publications of the-, ^ -j ;.- • Bureah. r f 1 r:- 5 r Iv-rmc v. -. Letter. Circulars are not' available sin' the Government Print- ing Office, and the supply at the Bureau of -Standards Is- -limited Many inquiries' are- received- by- this. Bureau -in (regard to the resistance to corrosion of- ."cas.t iron, and of . steel, wrought iron, commercially pure-/ open-hearth iron. 'and copper-bearing -. iron or* steel in sheet - -pipe;,; wir.e-;..;andrsther forms both bare , : . and zinc : coat ed dr otherwise, trust' propled-t, : : Some inquirers request opinions on the suitability of specif - in makes or brands of these -materials , for specific uses. "It -is not the policy .of the -.Bur eau to recommend or. -de- cry specific mates or brands .of any article; Its .tests and. investi gallons deal with ..types of material, not- with, the merits or demerits of a .particular .maker* s product. ;--Thls . Letter - Circular is prepared to put those making such inquiries on types of material in touch with -published data -and opinions on the 'subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Cavitation Damage by Surface Treatment
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ST. ANTHONY FALLS HYDRAULIC LABORATORY Project Report No. 81 Reduction of Cavitation Damage by Surface Treatment by JOHN F. RIPKEN Distribution 01 this Document is Unlimited Prepared for DAVID TAYLOR MODEL BASIN Department of the Navy Washington, D.C. under Bureau of Ships General Hydromechanics Research Program S-R009-01-01 Office of Naval Research Contract Nonr 710(64) July 1966 Minneapolis, Minnesota Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government ~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----------- ------- -------- --- , .(. I ' ABSTRACT It was rationalized, with limited supporting evidence, that 1 I ~. I most damage due to cavitation stems from cavities which are the consequence of outgassing nuclei growing from fissures in a body's surface. To minimize this damage, it was proposed that body surfaces be treated to reduce the number and activity of these surface faults. Vibratory cavitation damage tests of specimens treated to seal, neutralize, or compress the test surface indicated that these protective measures were inadequate for the severe conditions of a vibratory test. Light shot peening of a work hardening stainless steel prior to cavitation exposure substantially reduced the normal rate of cavitation erosion. i I' < I iii ---------------------------------- ------------ CONTENTS Page Abstract • • • • • • • • II " ,. II ,. • • 'iI'.''''''''·''·- iii List of Illustrations • • • • • ,., .. ", .... "" vii I. INTRODUCTION • • , •• , ••••• ".'.11.·,."." 1 II. THE OUTGASSING OF METALLIC SURFACES AND THE RELATION TO CAVITATION . ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. , • , ,. ,. • ,. ,. , ,. • • .. , • II • • 2 III. SURFACE TREATMENT FOR SUPPRESSION OF OUTGASSING • ,. ,. ,. ; II .. 9 A. General Considerations •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 B. Applied Non-Metallic Films ••••• • • • • • • 10 C. Chemical Treatment of Metallic Surfaces • • • • • 11 D. Physical Treatment of Metallic Surfaces • • -. • • 11 E. Applied Metallic Coatings of Metallic Substrate • 13 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Corrosion Protection
    An analysis of corrosion- A Guide To Corrosion related issues for passenger car and light Protection truck underbody structural components. Auto/Steel Partnership A GUIDE TO CORROSION PROTECTION For Passenger Car and Light Truck Underbody Structural Components Prepared by Light Truck Frame Project Team Auto/Steel Partnership 2000 Town Center, Suite 320 Southfield, Michigan 48075-1123 1999 The following companies are members of the Auto/Steel Partnership: AK Steel Corporation Bethlehem Steel Corporation DaimlerChrysler Corporation Dofasco Inc. Ford Motor Company General Motors Corporation Ispat Inland Inc. LTV Steel Company National Steel Corporation Rouge Steel Company Stelco Inc. U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of USX Corporation WCI Steel, Inc. Weirton Steel Corporation This publication was prepared by: Auto/Steel Partnership Light Truck Frame Project Team 2000 Town Center, Suite 320 Southfield, Michigan, 48075-1123 First Edition, December 1999 This publication is for general information only. The material contained herein should not be used without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any given application. This publication is not intended as a representation or warranty on the part of Auto/Steel Partnership - or any other person named herein - that the information is suitable for any general or particular use or freedom from infringement of any patent or patents. Anyone making use of the information assumes all liability arising from such use. For more information or additional copies of this publication, please contact the Auto/Steel Partnership, 2000 Town Center, Suite 320, Southfield, MI 48075-1123 or phone: 248-945-7777, fax: 248-356-8511, web site: www.a-sp.org Copyright 1999 Auto/Steel Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Alsheettm Alsheet
    www.nipponsteel.com Steel Sheet ALSHEET TM Hot-dip aluminum-coated steel sheets ALSHEETTM 2-6-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku,Tokyo 100-8071 Japan U034en_02_202004pU034en_02_202004f Tel: +81-3-6867-4111 © 2019, 2020 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION Introduction Manufacturing Process Overall manufacturing Blast furnace TM process ALSHEET is a cold-rolled steel that has been hot-dipped in an aluminum/silicon alloy. It Acid Pickling offers the attractive surface of processed steel sheet that simultaneously affords some of Converter the features of aluminum, such as resistance to corrosion, attractive appearance, coupled Cold Rolling with superior heat resistance and heat reflection, cold-rolled steel’s mechanical attributes Continuous Casting and other physical characteristics. Hot-dip We have been manufacturing hot-dip aluminum-coated steel sheets under the name Hot Rolling aluminum plating “ALSHEETTM” since July 1961, and it has been widely adopted thanks to its superior features, such as for vehicle mufflers (silencers), toasters, and gas cookers. In recent years, there have been calls for the development of materials to succeed Cooling equipment stainless steel sheets to cope with exhaust gas restrictions, and inexpensive materials Post-Processing TM in order to cut costs, and accordingly the demand for ALSHEET with improved heat Hot-dip Aluminum Plating The quality and shape of the aluminum- resistance performance has grown in these fields as well. Process coated sheet are improved by the We have recently developed further improvements to our products in terms of heat <in order of process> skin pass and tension leveler, and post-processing is applied to the add resistance, strength at high temperature, colorfastness, and corrosion resistance, and corrosion resistance and enhance paint have extended our product lineup to meet the ever-diversifying needs of today’s market.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Solicitation Gs-2020-4 for the Furnishing
    NOTICE OF SOLICITATION GS-2020-4 FOR THE FURNISHING AND DELIVERY OF One (1) 4-Wheel Drive 18,000 lb GVWR Cab, Utility Body and Accessories; AND/OR One (1) 37,600 lb GVWR Cab and Chassis with (8) Cubic Yard Dump Body; AND/OR Three (3) 16K Tilt Deck Equipment Trailers; AND/OR One (1) Rubber Track Open Cab Excavator January 2020 CONTENTS NOTICE OF SOLICITATION ....................................................................................................... 1 OFFER ............................................................................................................................................ 2 SCOPE OF WORK AND AWARD ............................................................................................... 7 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE FOR FINAL PAYMENT ............................................. 15 SPECIFICATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 16 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR GOODS AND SERVICES ............................. 26 NOTICE OF SOLICITATION SEALED OFFERS will be received up to and publicly opened at 2:00 p.m. (Hawaiʻi Standard Time) on Thursday, February 06, 2020, at the Department of Water Office of the County of Kauaʻi (“Department of Water” or “Department”), 4398 Pua Loke Street, Līhuʻe, Kauaʻi, Hawaiʻi, for the furnishing and delivery of GS-2020-4 One (1) 4-Wheel Drive 18,000 lb GVWR Cab, Utility Body and Accessories; AND/OR One (1) 37,600 lb GVWR Cab and Chassis with (8) Cubic Yard Dump Body; AND/OR Three (3)
    [Show full text]