Roles and Responsibilities of Mayors and Local Councillors in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Roles and Responsibilities of Mayors and Local Councillors in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus Roles and responsibilities of mayors and local councillors in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus Abbreviations and acronyms Congress: Congress of Local and Regional Authorities Charter: European Charter for Local Self-Government EaP: Eastern Partnership EU: European Union LGU: local-government unit LSG: local self-government NGO: non-governmental organisation Cover: SPDP Council of Europe Text : Congress of the local and regional authorities of the Council of Europe Print: Council of Europe Edition: January 2016 This document is being produced with the financial assistance of the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to represent the official opinion of the European Union and the Council of Europe http://eap-pcf-eu.coe.int Table of Contents Executive summary of key findings, conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................ 6 1. Introduction ......................................................................... 17 2. The legislative framework regulating the legal status and other conditions of the office of elected self-government representatives ............................................................................... 18 3. Core legal and implementation issues determining the execution of roles and functions of elected LSG representatives ..... 31 4. Overview of main strengths and weaknesses ...................... 49 4.1 Local finance ................................................................. 49 4.2 Conditions of the office of local elected representatives 52 4.3 Relations between state and elected self-governments . 54 4.4 Relations between mayors and assemblies ..................... 57 4.5 Quality of local democracy ............................................. 57 4.6 Fragmentation and regional self-government ............... 59 5. Recommendations on strengthening the role and powers of local elected representatives to enable them to better contribute to local democratic governance. ........................................................ 60 5.1 Local finance ...................................................................61 5.2 Conditions of office of local elected representatives .......63 5.3 Relations between state and elected self-governments . 65 5.4 Relations between mayors and assemblies ..................... 67 5.5 Quality of local democracy ............................................. 67 Annex 1: Brief Characteristics of the Local Government Systems in the Eastern Partnership countries .................................................. 69 Annex 2: Congress recommendations on local democracy in Armenia (n° 351), and on local and regional democracy in Azerbaijan (n° 326), Georgia (n° 334), Republic of Moldova (n° 322) and Ukraine (n° 348) ......................................................................................... 103 Annex 3: Recommendation 383 (2015) on the “Conditions of office of local and regional elected representatives” ................................... 122 Annex 4: Resolution 368 (2014) on the “Strategy on the right of local authorities to be consulted by other levels of government” ........... 126 Foreword Mayors and local councillors play a vital role in promoting the principles of local democracy and shared values within their communities. Aside from the role prescribed in the legislation, it is upon them to establish standards of good governance, ethical behaviour and transparency in concrete terms as they are the public officials closest to citizens. The challenges faced at global level demand resolute actions in order to implement the principles of ethical governance, sustainable development and greater solidarity in public policies. Local authorities, more than ever, are compelled to propose innovative approaches to manage and respond to the challenges arising with today’s urban development. It is upon them and their political leaders to promote new initiatives and exercise their public responsibilities in an effective and inclusive manner. Analysing the respective national legislation and its practical application in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus, it is evident that the nature of this responsibility can vary due to differing trends, not only within the legal framework of a country and its capacity for further decentralisation, but also through the overarching vision and political will. While the principles of local democracy are a straightforward concept and based on the European Charter of Local Self-Government, the practice and the implementation vary from country to country. The study on the roles and responsibilities of mayors and local councillors in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus, commissioned by the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, takes an integral look at the execution of roles and functions, the division and scope of responsibilities, and the financial situation faced by local elected representatives. By addressing the issues that local authorities encounter concerning the core legal structure, its implementation and the exercise of their powers, Professor Juraj Nemec, member of the Group of Independent Experts on the European Charter of Local Self-Government, with support from the respective experts in each of the countries concerned, has developed a set of practical recommendations in this regard. 6 Five main areas were identified for further action to enhance local democracy. The findings and recommendations were developed through an inclusive approach involving the relevant ministries and associations of local and regional authorities in each country. Furthermore, the study analyses the relevant legislation within each country, highlighting their compliance with the European Charter of Local Self-Government – a unique legal instrument, ratified by all 47 Council of Europe member States. The promotion of the principles of the Charter and their practical implementation is at the core of the Congress’ activities to advance the rights of local authorities. It is with this perspective that the study has been developed to contribute to strengthening the role and powers of local leaders, in order for them to take full ownership of their actions for the development and well-being of their communities. I would like to give my sincere thanks to all involved in this process. Andreas Kiefer Secretary General The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities 7 Executive summary of key findings, conclusions and recommendations This study, which focuses on the roles and responsibilities of mayors and councillors in the Eastern Partnership countries, has been developed within the Council of Europe/European Union Eastern Partnership Programmatic Co-operation Framework (PCF) 2015-2017, and is related to Theme V “Promoting Democratic Governance”, jointly implemented by the Directorate General of Democracy and the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe. The aim of this study is to provide a clear picture of the legislative and practical lacunae that hinder the effective implementation of the tasks incumbent on local elected representatives in the region and to suggest proposals to improve the situation (as of autumn 2015). The European Charter of Local Self-Government (CETS No. 122), hereafter “the Charter”, represents the core source and the benchmark for the improvement of local government systems in Europe and also in turn for the analysis and the synopsis in this study. Within the Eastern Partnership region, the Charter was ratified by the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine in 1997, Armenia and Azerbaijan in 2002, and Georgia in 2004. Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia ratified the Charter with reservations. Belarus is not a member state of the Council of Europe and has not signed the Charter. The Additional Protocol on the right to participate in the affairs of a local authority (CETS No. 207), opened to signature in 2009, was ratified by Armenia in 2013 and by Ukraine in 2014. When reforming their public administration systems, all countries included in this report created their own legislative framework, thereby determining the distribution of powers and competences between government bodies, as well as the main rules to govern the functioning of local self-governments (LSGs). However, certain gaps (on a different scale in each country) remain and every system requires improvement in order to fully comply with all Charter principles. 8 In Belarus and Azerbaijan, most powers at the local level lie with state administration bodies. Systemic changes to the constitution and local government laws are core future reform tasks in these two countries. The local government system in Armenia is highly dependent on central government. The level of independence, as well as the level of decentralisation, is low. Local government units (LGUs) do not have sufficient power to deliver essential public services at the community level or to organise community life properly. This is mainly due to the low level of decentralisation in Armenia – the relationship between LGUs and the territorial state administration (Marzpetarans) is not properly regulated. However, the LSG situation might improve as the result of constitutional changes from made in December 2015. In Georgia and the Republic of Moldova, the legal base for local government appears to be highly compliant with the Charter principles. Nonetheless, these countries
Recommended publications
  • Strategia De Dezvoltare Economică Şi Socială a Judeţului Suceava, Perioada 2011 – 2020
    UNIUNEA EUROPEANĂ GUVERNUL ROMÂNIEI Inovaţie în administraţie Fondul Social European Ministerul Administraţiei şi Programul Operaţional Internelor "Dezvoltarea Capacităţii Administrative” STRATEGIA DE DEZVOLTARE ECONOMICĂ ŞI SOCIALĂ A JUDEŢULUI SUCEAVA, PERIOADA 2011 – 2020 Proiect cofinanțat din Fondul Social European, prin Programul Operațional “Dezvoltarea Capacității Administrative” 1 CUPRINS SECŢIUNEA A. CADRUL DE REFERINŢĂ – Evaluarea situaţiei existente din punct de vedere socio - economic, al mediului şi al nivelului de echipare tehnică şi socială în judeţul Suceava ................................................ 4 CAPITOLUL I. CADRUL NATURAL............................................................................................................................... 4 I.1. Aşezarea geografică. Frontiere ....................................................................................................................... 4 I.2. Suprafaţa ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 I.3. Populaţia ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 I.4. Unităţile administrativ-teritoriale .................................................................................................................. 4 I.5. Reţeaua hidrografică ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonizing State- and EU-Funded Projects in Regions | Final Synthesis Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
    Public Disclosure Authorized Harmonizing STATE- AND EU-FUNDED PROJECTS in Regions | Final Synthesis Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Agreement for Harmonizing State- and EU-funded Final Investment Programs Romania Regional Development Program 2 Synthesis Dated November 26, 2015 Project co-financed from the European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme Technical Assistance (OPTA) 2007-2013 Agreement for Advisory Services on Assistance to the Romanian Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration on Harmonizing State- and EU- funded Projects in Regions Final Synthesis November 26, 2015 Romania Regional Development Program 2 4 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. iv List of Boxes .............................................................................................................................................. iv List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ v Sumary ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monografia Judeţului Iaşi
    MONOGRAFIA JUDEŢULUI SUCEAVA Cuprins 1. Locul judeţului Suceava în economia naţională ............................................... 2. Prezentarea generală a judeţului....................................................................... Indicatori sintetici ai activităţii economice .................................................... 12 4. Agenţi economici ........................................................................................... 1 5. Unităţi locale active ....................................................................................... 1 6. Unităţi locale active din industrie, construcţii, comerţ şi alte servicii………15 7. Agricultura şi silvicultura ............................................................................... 17 8. Transporturi .................................................................................................... 2 9. Comerţ exterior .............................................................................................. 21 1 . Forţa de muncă şi veniturile salariale ........................................................... 2 11. Activitatea bancară ....................................................................................... 26 12. Investiţii străine ............................................................................................ 2 Bibliografie ........................................................................................................ 1. Locul judeţului Suceava în economia naţională Indicatori 1 11 Suprafaţa totală (ha) 2 2 2 2 Numărul
    [Show full text]
  • Strategia Integrată De Dezvoltare Urbană a Municipiului Giurgiu 2014-2020
    STRATEGIA INTEGRATĂ DE DEZVOLTARE URBANĂ A MUNICIPIULUI GIURGIU 2014-2020 1 ABREVIERI FEDR Fondul European pentru Dezvoltare Regională FSE Fondul European Social IMM Întreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii INS Institutul Naţional pentru Statistică ONG Organizaţii Neguvernamentale PIB Produs Intern Brut PO Programul Operaţional POR Programul Operaţional Regional PO CU Programul Operaţional Capital Uman POIM Programul Operațional Infrastructură Mare AFM Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu PUG Planul Urbanistic General PUZ Plan Urbanistic Zonal PUD Plan de Urbanism de Detaliu SF Studiu de Fezabilitate PT și DDE Proiect Tehnic și Detalii de Execuție PIDU Plan intregrat de dezvoltare urbană PMUD Plan de Mobilitate Urbană Durabilă ZUM Zonă Urbană Marginalizată 2 CUPRINS CAPITOLUL I. Contextul urban și identificarea principalelor probleme și provocări la nivel local ............................... 4 Subcapitolul 1 – Definirea situației existente ............................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Municipiul Giurgiu - aşezare, populaţie, suprafaţă ..................................................................... 4 1.2 Unităţi administrativ-teritoriale ................................................................................................. 10 1.3 Cadrul natural ........................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Economia ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 13: 978-1-60244-079-1 Isbn-10: 1-60244-079-4
    Evaluation of the World Bank’s Assistance to Basic Education in Romania A Country Case Study Sue E. Berryman Amber Gove Dana Sapatoru Anca Tirca Director-General, Independent Evaluation: Vinod Thomas Director, Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank: Ajay Chhibber Manager: Alain Barbu Task Manager: H. Dean Nielsen 2007 The World Bank This paper is available upon request from IEG. Washington, D.C. ENHANCING DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH EXCELLENCE AND INDEPENDENCE IN EVALUATION The Independent Evaluation Group is an independent unit within the World Bank Group; it reports directly to the Bank’s Board of Executive Directors. IEG assesses what works, and what does not; how a borrower plans to run and maintain a project; and the lasting contribution of the Bank to a country’s overall development. The goals of evaluation are to learn from experience, to provide an objective basis for assessing the results of the Bank’s work, and to provide accountability in the achievement of its objectives. It also improves Bank work by identifying and disseminating the lessons learned from experience and by framing recommendations drawn from evaluation findings. IEG Working Papers are an informal series to disseminate the findings of work in progress and to encourage the exchange of ideas about development effectiveness through evaluation. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Funcţiile Terţiare Ale Municipiului Cluj-Napoca
    UNIVERSITATEA BABEŞ-BOLYAI CLUJ-NAPOCA FACULTATEA DE GEOGRAFIE CATEDRA DE GEOGRAFIE UMANĂ TEZĂ DE DOCTORAT Rezumat FUNCŢIILE TERŢIARE ALE MUNICIPIULUI CLUJ-NAPOCA COORDONATOR ŞTIINŢIFIC: Prof. univ. dr. SURD VASILE DOCTORAND: PĂCURAR BOGDAN-NICOLAE CLUJ-NAPOCA 2011 CUPRINS 1. Memoriu epistemologic..............................................................................................................6 2. Etapele abordării geografiei urbane în ştiinţa geografică.....................................................10 2.1. Abordările geografiei internaţionale în ştiinţa geografiei urbane..................................10 2.2. Abordările geografiei româneşti în ştiinţa geografiei urbane........................................16 2.3. Geografia urbană în şcoala geografică clujeană.............................................................18 3. Funcţiile aşezărilor. Clasificare şi fundamentare epistemologică........................................21 3.1. Consideraţii funcţionaliste asupra conceptelor şi termenilor definitorii în structurarea concepţiei asupra funcţiilor aşezărilor..................................................................................21 3.2. Funcţiile aşezărilor. Clasificare şi fundamentare epistemologică..................................27 3.2.1. Funcţiile aşezărilor rurale................................................................................27 3.2.2. Funcţiile aşezărilor urbane...............................................................................31 4. Funcţiile terţiare ale municipiului
    [Show full text]
  • Profil Municipiul Suceava
    Partea I Profilul localit ăŃ ii Cuprins 1. PREZENTARE GENERAL Ă A LOCALIT Ăł II ........................................................................... 1 1.1. POZI łIE GEOGRAFIC Ă ŞI LIMITE ................................................................................................ 1 1.2. ATESTARE DOCUMENTAR Ă ŞI SCURT ISTORIC ........................................................................... 2 1.3. OBIECTIVE TURISTICE ............................................................................................................. 4 1.4. OAMENI DE SEAM Ă ............................................................................................................... 12 2. CAPITAL NATURAL ................................................................................................................ 20 2.1. TIP CLIM Ă............................................................................................................................. 20 2.2. RELIEF ................................................................................................................................. 20 2.3. SOLURILE ............................................................................................................................ 21 2.4. VEGETA łIE .......................................................................................................................... 21 2.5. FAUNA ................................................................................................................................. 22 2.6. CALITATEA AERULUI
    [Show full text]
  • Strategia Culturală a Municipiului T I M I Ș O A
    GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA SERBIAN GOVERNMENT STRATEGIA CULTURALĂ A MUNICIPIULUI TIMIȘOARA Investim în viitorul tău! Programul IPA de Cooperare Transfrontalieră România-Republica Serbia este finanţat de Uniunea Europeană prin Instrumentul 2014 - 2024 de Asistenţă pentru Preaderare (IPA) şi cofinanţat de statele partenere în program. Titlul proiectului: Politica culturală, instrument de dezvoltare comunitară şi regională Editorul materialului: Municipiul Timișoara Data publicării: noiembrie 2014 Conţinutul acestui material nu reprezintă în mod necesar poziţia oficială a Uniunii Europene. Pentru eventuale sesizări, contactaţi: [email protected] www.romania-serbia.net STRATEGIA CULTURALĂ A MUNICIPIULUI TIMIȘOARA 2014 - 2024 3 BENEFICIAR Primăria Municipiului Timişoara bd. C.D. Loga, nr. 1, cod poştal 300030 Timişoara, jud. Timiş T: +40 -(0)256408300, F.: +40 -(0)256490635 E: [email protected] I: www.primariatm.ro CONSORȚIU CONSULTANȚI Asociaţia MetruCub – resurse pentru cultură Calea Vitan nr. 201, bl.51, sc.1, et.8, ap.32, camera 2, cod poştal 031286, sector 3, Bucuresti T: +40 744399767 E: [email protected] I: www.m3culture.ro. A.T.U. – Asociaţia pentru Tranziţia Urbană str. Voila nr, 10, bl. 21, sc. 2, parler, ap. 16, camera 2, sector 4, Bucureşti T: +40 213126272 E: [email protected] I: www.atu.org.ro ECHIPA DE LUCRU Consorţiu contractat Coordonare: Vera Marin, Raluca Pop Planificare urbană şi planificare participativă: Vera Marin Politici culturale şi management cultural: Raluca Pop, Ioana Tamaş Arhitectură, patrimoniu, mediu
    [Show full text]
  • Hygiea Internationalis
    HYGIEA INTERNATIONALIS An Interdisciplinary Journal for the History of Public Health Volume 9, No. 1, 2010 Health and Welfare: Diversity and Convergence in Policy and Practice ISSN, Print: 1403-8668; Electronic: 1404-4013 URL: http://www.ep.liu.se/ej/hygiea/ Editorial Board Giovanni Berlinguer, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Italy Virginia Berridge, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, U.K. Patrice Bourdelais, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, France Linda Bryder, University of Auckland, New Zealand Marcos Cueto, Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Peru Christopher Hamlin, University of Notre Dame, U.S.A. Robert Jütte, Robert Bosch Stiftung, Germany Øivind Larsen, University of Oslo, Norway Marie C. Nelson, Linköping University, Sweden Dorothy E. Porter, University of California, U.S.A. Günter B. Risse, University of California, U.S.A. Esteban Rodriguez-Ocaña, University of Granada, Spain John Rogers, Uppsala University, Sweden Jan Sundin, Linköping University, Sweden Lars-Göran Tedebrand, Umeå University, Sweden John H. Woodward, The University of Sheffield, U.K. Editorial Committee Laurinda Abreu, Patrice Bourdelais, Jan Sundin and Sam Willner Copyright This journal is published under the auspices of Linköping University Electronic Press. All Authors retain the copyright of their articles. © The Authors Table of Contents Volume 9, No. 1, 2010 Laurinda Abreu Introduction: Health and Welfare: Diversity and Convergence in Policy and Practice 5 Fritz Dross Patterns of Hospitality: Aspects of Institutionalisation in 15th & 16th Centuries Nuremberg Healthcare 13 Maria Marta Lobo de Araújo Healing the Body and Saving the Soul in the and Alexandra Esteves Portuguese Hospitals of the Early Modern Age 35 María José Pérez Álvarez Disease and health care in the North-West of Spain in the early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Timisoara: Fragility Curves for Out-Of-Plane Local Mechanisms of Collapse
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Edile e Ambientale Laurea Magistrale a Ciclo Unico in Ingegneria Edile – Architettura SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF CLUSTERED BUILDINGS IN THE HISTORICAL CENTER OF TIMISOARA: FRAGILITY CURVES FOR OUT-OF-PLANE LOCAL MECHANISMS OF COLLAPSE RELATORE: Ch.ma Prof.ssa DA PORTO FRANCESCA CORRELATORI: Ch.mo Prof. CLAUDIO MODENA Ing. MARSON CLAUDIA Ing. MUNARI MARCO Ing. TAFFAREL SABRINA LAUREANDA: MARGHERITA ROVERATO ANNO ACCADEMICO 2014 / 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincere thanks to Prof. Francesca da Porto, supervisor of this thesis, and to Prof. Carlo Modena for the disposability shown and for the help provided in this thesis. My sincere thank you to Ing. Marco Munari, Ing. Claudia Marson and Ing. Sabrina Taffarel for the valuable guidance and the continuous encouragement as well as for the infinite patience. I am also grateful to the Polytechnic University of Timisoara for the help and the hospitality during the on-site activities and in particular I would like to thank Ing. Marius Mosoarca and Arch. Bogdan Demetrescu for the great disposability and the indispensable material provided. Thank you to my colleague and friend Claudia, with whom I spend the most part of my time and energy in the last months, to make enjoyable even the most difficult moments of this thesis. My heartfelt thanks to Elena, Giorgia and Linda, which join me and enjoy with me every day, and I mean literally every day, of these five years of University. My most beautiful academic memories are bond to you. I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my Family which has encouraged me and support me every day of my life, as well as tolerated me on my study periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Peri-Urban Areas and Land Use Structure in Romania at LAU2 Level: an Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Environmental Sciences 32 ( 2016 ) 124 – 137 International Conference – The Environment at a Crossroads: SMART approaches for a sustainable future Peri-urban Areas and Land Use Structure in Romania at LAU2 Level: An Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis Cristina Lincarua*, Draga Atanasiub, Vasilica Ciucăc, Spera nţa Pirciogd abcdLabour Market Department, National Scientific Research Institute for Labor and Social Protection - INCSMPS, 6-8 Povernei Street,, Bucharest 010643, Romania Abstract The smart, sustainable and inclusive growth adopted by Europe 2020 demands new types of information as it is the land use data as an indicator of the land (a primary production factor) - the building block of any economy. Our method is based the article of Salvati & Carlucci (2014) regarding the Urban Growth and Land Use Structure, we develop an Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis ESDA (Method of Choropleth Maps and LISA, Anselin 2003, 2005) for identification of peri-urban areas in Romania at LAU2 level as lattice data (in Arc Gis, GeoDa) and statistical analysis (in SPSS). The main results of this paper consists in suggesting that the indicator land us changes towards covering with buildings could be used as a synthesis monitoring indicator for the divergent growth effects, allowing the identification of the peri-urban areas, as a result of positive agglomeration process formation based on New Economic Geography theory background. The shapes and locations identified offer a quantitative imagine complementary characterized in a qualitative manner by their higher propensity to be with the highest global competitive performance among the national landscape, in the context of free market main driving force expression.
    [Show full text]
  • No 5 Senegal
    AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, NATIONAL LEGISLATION, JUDGEMENTS, AND INSTITUTIONS AS THEY INTERRELATE WITH TERRITORIES AND AREAS CONSERVED BY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES REPORT NO. 5 SENEGAL “Land is the foundation of the lives and cultures of Indigenous peoples all over the world… Without access to and respect for their rights over their lands, territories and natural resources, the survival of Indigenous peoples’ particular distinct cultures is threatened.” Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues Report on the Sixth Session 25 May 2007 Authored by: Dieng Ndiawar and Ndiaye Soulèye Published by: Natural Justice in Bangalore and Kalpavriksh in Pune and Delhi Date: September 2012 Cover Photo: A centuries-old shell mound at Petit Kassa, Casamance, Senegal. © Christian Chatelain Page 2 of 61 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of acronyms .................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 7 Summary ............................................................................................................................... 8 1. Country description and context ...................................................................................... 10 1.1. Key features of Senegal ............................................................................................. 10 1.2. Brief history of conservation, state- and community-based .....................................
    [Show full text]