Evolutionary Relationships Among the Atelocerata (Labiata)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Evolutionary Relationships Among the Atelocerata (Labiata) • In the previous lecture we concluded that the Phylum Arthropoda is a monophyletic group. This group is supported by a number of synapomorphies that unite the 5 recognized subgroups (trilobites, chelicerates, crustaceans, myriapods and hexapods). • We also concluded that the sister group to the Arthropoda is either the Oynchophora or the Tardigrada. • However we also discovered that the evolutionary relationships among the 5 subgroups in the Arthropoda are still unresolved. Myriapoda, Crustacea and Hexapoda do seemed united as the Mandibulata, but the placement of the Hexapoda is questionable. Some studies unite the Hexapoda with the Myriapoda, forming the Atelocerata (Labiata in the textbook), while other studies unite the Hexapoda with the Crustacea, forming the Pancrustacea. Still other studies place the Hexapoda within the Crustacea, making the Crustacea, paraphyletic as currently defined. • Until more convincing evidence to the contrary we will assume that the Myriapoda and the Hexapoda form a natural (monophyletic) group as does your textbook. Characters that Unite the Myriapoda and Hexapoda • One pair of antennae versus two pair in crustaceans. • Metamerically arranged tracheae versus gills in crustaceans. • Development of excretory Malpighian tubules from the hind gut versus nephridia in crustaceans. • Production of spermatophores versus release of free sperm in crustaceans. • Possession of anterior tentorial arms in head capsule versus no tentorium in crustaceans. Classification and Characteristics of the Myriapoda • Diplopoda (millipedes)—21 body segments; body segments fused in pairs each with two pairs of legs (hence the name); lack of second maxillae (dignathous); reproductive organs open at anterior body segment (progoneate); short antennae not branched; 8000 species. • Pauropoda (pauropods)—11 or 12 body segments; one pair of legs on each metamere; dignathous; progoneate; short antennae branched; 700 species. • Chilopoda (centipedes)—15-170 body segments; at most one pair of legs on each metamere; probably dignathous (possible trignathous); gential opening on last body segment (opistogoneate); long filamentous antennae; 3000 species. • Symphyla (symphylans)—14 body segments; at most one pair of legs on each metamere; trignathous; progoneate; antennae long and musculated; 200 species. • Phylogenetic relationships among these four classes are not well resolved. Characters that Unite the Myriapoda and separate them from the Hexapoda • Loss of compound eyes. • Loss of palps on the first and second maxillae. • Presence of organs of Tömösvary at the base each antenna. May be used to detect auditory stimuli. • Presence of special repugnatorial glands. Characters that unite the Hexapoda and separate them from the Myriapoda • Fusion of the second maxillae as the labium (also seen in the symphylans). • Formation of a distinct thorax composed of three body segments, and a distinct abdomen. • Fixation of the maximal number of abdominal segments at 11, plus the telson. Fewer abdominal segments possible through reduction. • Loss of all abdominal appendages. Evolutionary Relationships within the Hexapoda • An old theory suggested that the hexapods evolved from the symphylan- like ancestor. If true, this would make Two possible relationships of the myriapods paraphyletic. This theory the Entognatha and Insecta is now discredited and certainly would not be true if the myriapods are not the sister group of the hexapods. • The Hexapoda is composed of two Myriapoda classes, the Entognatha and the Insecta Insecta. Your textbook divides the Entognatha into two classes: the Diplura Entognatha (Diplura) and the Protura Parainsecta (Protura and Collembola). Recent evidence indicates that the Collembola Entognatha is a monophyletic group that is the sister group of the insects. • Some studies suggest that the Diplura Myriapoda is the sister group to the insects Insecta because they shared filiform cerci, and Diplura characteristics of the sperm. This would make the Entognatha paraphyletic as Protura defined here. Collembola Classification and Characteristics of the Entognatha • Protura—12 segments in the abdomen; minute elongate bodies; functionally tetrapodal, forelegs serve as sensory appendages; antennae absent; 500 species. • Collembola—no more than 6 segments in the abdomen; minute stout bodies; antennae with few segments; highly modified structures for jumping; 6000 species. • Diplura—10 segments in the abdomen; small to large enlongate bodies; antennae long, unbranched; superfically similar to symphylans; 800 species. Characters that unite the Entognatha and separate them from the Insecta • Endognathy (enclosed mouth). Preoral cavity enclosed laterally by pleural folds which grow down from the head and fuse with the labium. • Eyes reduced or absent. • Reduced Malpighian tubules. • Enlongate, sac-like ovarioles. Major Groups within Class Insecta • Class Insecta is divided into two major subgroups, the Apterygotes (=primitively wingless insects) and the Pterygota (=winged insects). The Pterygota appears to be monophyletic, but the Apterygota is not. • The Apterygota consists of two orders, the Archaeognatha and the Thysanura. • The Pterygota is divided into the Paleoptera (=old wing) and the Neoptera (=new wing). The Paleoptera cannot flex their wings over the abdomen, while the Neoptera can. The Neoptera appears to be a monophyletic group. The Paleoptera is probably not. • The Paleoptera consists of two extent orders, the Ephemeroptera and the Odonata. The Neoptera consist of 26 orders, which are divided into one formal group, the Holometabola (11 orders) and two informal groups the “Polyneoptera” (11 orders) and the “Paraneotpera” (4 orders). Archaeognatha (Bristletails) • Classification. 2 extant families, one extinct family. 500 species worldwide. • Structure. Large compound eyes with continuous medial border. Mandibles are monocondylic (single point of articulation with the head). Apical incisors widely separated from the molar process, which operates with a rolling motion as in crustaceans. Tentorium with very simple structure. Appendages have a ventral articulation with body instead of lateral one as seen in more derived insects. Coxae have small exites (styli), reminiscent of the biramous condition in crustaceans. Abdominal styli present. Specialized jumping structures and musculature. Body covered in scales. • Natural history. Active at night, hiding by day under back or in rock crevices. Feed on algae, lichen and vegetable debris. Primitive mandibles used a augers. Moderately good runners and jumpers. Jump by flexing abdomen. Sperm transfer indirect via a spermatophore. Ametabolous (without metamorphosis) development, with immatures closely resembling adults. Molting continues throughout life. Thysanura (Silverfish) • Classification. 5 living families. 370 species worldwide. • Structure. Mandibles are dicondylic (two points of articulation with the head capsule). Apical incisors and molar region are not widely separated. Biting is transverse as in more derived insects. Coxae do not have styli. Abdominal styli variably present. Body covered in scales. • Natural history. Free-living cryptozoics living under bark and rocks, and in leaf- litter. Very common in ant nests. Most species are omnivorous. Some species are subterranean or cavernicolous herbivores. Some species produce cellulase to aid in digestion of cellulose. Sperm transfer is indirect via a spermatophore. Ametabolous development with immatures closely resembling adults. Molting continues throughout life. Lifespan of some species over 4 years. Conclusions • Despite sharing some complex characters, the validity of the group Atelecerata (Myriapoda + Hexapoda) is questionable and several recent studies place the Hexapoda in the Crustacea or as its sister group. • The Hexapoda is divided into the Entognatha and the Insecta. The Insecta is clearly monophyletic, but the Entognatha may not be, depending on the placement of the Diplura. • The Insecta are divided into the Apterygota (not monophyletic) and the Pterygota (monophyletic), which in turn is divided in the Paleoptera (not monophyletic) and the Neoptera (monophyletic). • The Apterygota consist of two orders of small wingless insects, the Archaeognatha (Bristletails) and the Thysanura (Silverfish). These groups show several characters that illustrate the evolutionary transition from the Entognathans to the insects. The Thysanura is the sister goup to the Pterygota. .
Recommended publications
  • For the Love of Insects

    For the Love of Insects

    For the Love of Insects “In terms of biomass and their interactions with other terrestrial organisms, insects are the most important group of terrestrial animals.” --Grimaldi and Engel, 2005 Outline • The Most Successful Animals on Earth: a Brief (Entomological) Journey through Time • Insect Physiology and Development • Common Insects and their Identification Whence and Whither: Insect Origins and Evolution Before diversity, there was evolution… A ~500 million year journey… Silurian • Insect Flight: 400 mya • Modern insect orders: 250 mya • Primitive mammals: 120 mya • Modern mammals: 60 mya The Jointed Animals Phylum: Arthropoda • 75% of all species on earth are arthropods • Internal/External specialization of body parts = tagmosis • Hardened exoskeleton • Articulated body plates • Paired, jointed appendages sciencenewsjournal.com Tagmosis: highly specialized body segments found in all arthropods; insects: head, thorax, abdomen; spiders: cephalothorax and opisthosoma Epiclass HEXAPODA: Late Silurian/Early Devonian Class Entognatha Order Diplura Ellipura Order Protura Order Collembola Class Insecta (= Ectognatha) Hexapoda • 6 legs; 11 abdominal segments (or fewer) taxondiversity.fieldofscience.com • Entognatha: Protura, Diplura, and Collembola • Ectognatha: Insects The First Insects: Apterygota Archaeognatha: The Jumping Bristletails • ~500 spp. worldwide; wide range of habitats; • 4 Families (2 extinct) which occur mostly in rocky habitats • Mostly detritovores, but scavenge dead arthropods or eat exuviae; • Indirect mating behavior;
  • Evolution of the Insects David Grimaldi and Michael S

    Evolution of the Insects David Grimaldi and Michael S

    Cambridge University Press 0521821495 - Evolution of the Insects David Grimaldi and Michael S. Engel Frontmatter More information EVOLUTION OF THE INSECTS Insects are the most diverse group of organisms to appear in the 3-billion-year history of life on Earth, and the most ecologically dominant animals on land. This book chronicles, for the first time, the complete evolutionary history of insects: their living diversity, relationships, and 400 million years of fossils. Whereas other volumes have focused on either living species or fossils, this is the first comprehensive synthesis of all aspects of insect evolution. Current estimates of phylogeny are used to interpret the 400-million-year fossil record of insects, their extinctions, and radiations. Introductory sections include the living species, diversity of insects, methods of reconstructing evolutionary relationships, basic insect structure, and the diverse modes of insect fossilization and major fossil deposits. Major sections cover the relationships and evolution of each order of hexapod. The book also chronicles major episodes in the evolutionary history of insects: their modest beginnings in the Devonian, the origin of wings hundreds of millions of years before pterosaurs and birds, the impact that mass extinctions and the explosive radiation of angiosperms had on insects, and how insects evolved the most complex societies in nature. Evolution of the Insects is beautifully illustrated with more than 900 photo- and electron micrographs, drawings, diagrams, and field photographs, many in full color and virtually all original. The book will appeal to anyone engaged with insect diversity: professional ento- mologists and students, insect and fossil collectors, and naturalists. David Grimaldi has traveled in 40 countries on 6 continents collecting and studying recent species of insects and conducting fossil excavations.
  • First Survey of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) Fauna in Soil of Archipelago Fernando De Noronha, Brazil Estevam C

    First Survey of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) Fauna in Soil of Archipelago Fernando De Noronha, Brazil Estevam C

    First survey of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) fauna in soil of Archipelago Fernando de Noronha, Brazil Estevam C. Araujo De Lima1, * and Douglas Zeppelini1,2, Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) is one of the most abundant Table 1. Collembola recorded on the Fernando de Noronha archipelago, Brazil. and widely distributed taxa among terrestrial Hexapoda (Hopkin 1997). Collection localites were: a sandy beach (SB), soil on the slope of a cliff (SC) and the Soil in the forest at the hilltop (SF). World distribution was summarized for Collembola specimens are found in almost all habitats, excluding each species as follows: Boreal (Bor) include regions 1–8, Neotropical (Neo) re- aquatic environments below the surface firm where their occurrence is gions 24–30, South African (Saf) region 31, Paleotropical (Pal) regions 9–23, Aus- rare or accidental. The greatest diversity and abundance of these spe- tralian (Aus) regions 32–34, and Antarctic (Ant) regions 35–37. Species distributed cies occurs in soil and in adjacent microhabitats, especially where there in at least, in 4 of the major regions (Neo, Pal, etc.) are considered to be cosmo- is much organic matter (Zeppelini et al. 2008). The potential value of politan (Cos). Species distribution restricted to Northeast and Central Brazil (NCB), restricted to Fernando de Noronha (RFN) and doubtful distribution Record (?). Collembola as biological indicators of soil health and ecosystem quality is increasingly recognized and therefore knowledge of the diversity of Localities Collembola becomes useful in the development of conservation strate- World gies and environmental monitoring (Stork & Eggleton 1992; Zeppelini Taxa SB SC SF distribution et al.
  • Collembola (Entognatha) from East Africa

    Collembola (Entognatha) from East Africa

    Eur. J. Entomol. 95: 217-237, 1998 ISSN 1210-5759 Collembola (Entognatha) from East Africa W anda M. WEINER1 and Judith NAJT2 1 Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Slawkowska 17, PL-31016 Krakdw, Poland 2EP 90 du CNRS, Laboratoire d’Entomologie, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 45, rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France Collembola, Hypogastruridae, Odontellidae, Neanuridae, Onychiuridae, Isotomidae, East Africa, identification keys, new species, redescription Abstract. Materials of Hypogastruridae, Odontellidae, Neanuridae, Onychiuridae and Isotomidae from East Africa were studied. Several new species are described: Acherontiella kowalskiorum sp. n., Furcu- lanurida grandcolasorum sp. n., Stachorutes dallaii sp. n., and Paleonura cassagnaui sp. n. Friesea vtorovi Tshelnokov, 1977 and Tullbergia kilimanjarica (Delamare Deboutteville, 1953) are redescribed. Stachorutes arlei (Thibaud & Massoud, 1980) is a new combination. Identification keys for Friesea Dalla Torre, 1895 with 2 + 2 eyes and Stachorutes Dallai, 1973 are given. INTRODUCTION The last systematic account on the Collembola of East Africa was presented by Dehar- veng and Diaz in 1984 with a review of all references concerning this region. The present study is based on the material collected in Tanzania and Kenya. Abbreviations . ISEA - Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sci­ ences, Krakdw, Poland; MNHN - Laboratoire d ’Entomologie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France. SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT Family Hypogastruridae Ceratophysella denticulata Bagnall, 1941 M aterial examined . Tanzania, Ngorongoro Conservation Area, 2,200 m a.s.l., brink of the crater, dry forest near Sopa Lodge, 28.viii.1996, lgt. B. & K. Kowalski, 2 specimens: $ and 6 juv. Geographical distribution .
  • GAYANA Assessing Climatic and Intrinsic Factors That Drive Arthropod

    GAYANA Assessing Climatic and Intrinsic Factors That Drive Arthropod

    GAYANA Gayana (2020) vol. 84, No. 1, 25-36 DOI: XXXXX/XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ORIGINAL ARTICLE Assessing climatic and intrinsic factors that drive arthropod diversity in bird nests Evaluando los factores climáticos e intrínsecos que explican la diversidad de artrópodos dentro de nidos de aves Gastón O. Carvallo*, Manuel López-Aliste, Mercedes Lizama, Natali Zamora & Giselle Muschett Instituto de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Campus Curauma, Avenida Universidad 330, Valparaíso, Chile. *E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Bird nests are specialized structures that act as microrefuge and a source of food for arthropods. Nest arthropod richness and composition may vary according to the nest builder, geographical location and nest size. Because information on nest arthropods is scarce, there are even fewer studies on the drivers of nest arthropod diversity. We characterized arthropod diversity in cup- and dome-shaped nests along a 130 km latitudinal gradient in the mediterranean-type region of Central Chile and, we assessed whether nest dimensions and climatic factors explain richness (alpha-diversity). Then, we evaluated whether climatic differences between sites explain arthropod nest composition (beta-diversity). All collected nests hosted at least one arthropod specimen. We identified 43 taxonomic entities (4.2 entities per nest ± 0.5, mean ± SE, n = 27 nests) belonging to 18 orders and five classes: Arachnida, Diplopoda, Entognatha, Insecta and Malacostraca. We observed differences in nest arthropod richness and composition related to sites but not bird species. Larger nests supported greater arthropod richness. Furthermore, we observed that climatic differences explain the variation in arthropod composition between sites. Nests in the northern region (drier and warmer) mainly hosted Hemipterans and Hymenopterans.
  • 2017 ESA, ESA Certification Corporation, and Entomological Foundation Awards

    2017 ESA, ESA Certification Corporation, and Entomological Foundation Awards

    2017 ESA, ESA Certification Corporation, and Entomological Foundation Awards Each year the Entomological Society of America, the ESA Certification Corporation, and the Entomological Foundation provide annual honors and awards to recognize scientists, educators, early professionals, and students who have distinguished themselves through their contributions to entomology. For more information on the ESA, Certification Corporation, and Entomological Foundation Awards, visit www.entsoc.org/awards. ENTOMOLOGY 2017 | NOVEMBER 5–8 | DENVER, COLORADO 43 Awards: Sunday, November 5 2017 ESA, CERTIFICATION and ENTOMOLOGICAL FOUNDATION AWARDS Opening Plenary: ESA Fellows, ESA Honorary Members & Entomological Foundation Medal of Honor ESA’s 2017 Honorary Members and Fellows will be presented during the Opening Plenary Session on Sunday, November 5, 7:30 – 9:30 PM, and the Awards Breakfast on Tuesday, November 7, 7:30 – 9:00 AM. Both sessions will take place in the Four Seasons Ballroom of the Convention Center. Honorary Members Dr. Roger Moon became professor emeritus of entomology at the University of Honorary membership acknowledges those who have Minnesota in St. Paul after 36 years of served ESA for at least 20 years through significant service in research, teaching, and outreach. involvement in the affairs of the Society that has reached an He earned a Ph.D. in entomology from the extraordinary level. Candidates for this honor are selected University of California, Davis, in 1979. His research by the ESA Governing Board and then voted on by the ESA concerns the biology, ecology, and management of filth membership. flies, mosquitoes, bots, keds, lice, bugs, and mites that occur around livestock, wildlife, and people.
  • The Genome of the Blind Soil-Dwelling and Ancestrally Wingless Dipluran Campodea Augens, a Key Reference Hexapod for Studying the Emergence of Insect Innovations

    The Genome of the Blind Soil-Dwelling and Ancestrally Wingless Dipluran Campodea Augens, a Key Reference Hexapod for Studying the Emergence of Insect Innovations

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/585695; this version posted June 29, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. The genome of the blind soil-dwelling and ancestrally wingless dipluran Campodea augens, a key reference hexapod for studying the emergence of insect innovations Mosè Manni1*, Felipe A. Simao1, Hugh M. Robertson2, Marco A. Gabaglio1, Robert M. Waterhouse3, Bernhard Misof4, Oliver Niehuis5, Nikolaus U. Szucsich6, Evgeny M. Zdobnov1* 1Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland. 2Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 3Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland. 4Center for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany. 5Department of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Albert Ludwig University, Institute of Biology I (Zoology), Freiburg, Germany. 6Natural History Museum Vienna, 3rd Zoological Dept., Vienna, Austria. *Authors for Correspondence: Evgeny M. Zdobnov, email: [email protected] Mosè Manni, email: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/585695; this version posted June 29, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
  • Collembola (Springtails) (Arthropoda: Hexapoda: Entognatha) Found in Scrapings from Individuals Diagnosed with Delusory Parasitosis

    Collembola (Springtails) (Arthropoda: Hexapoda: Entognatha) Found in Scrapings from Individuals Diagnosed with Delusory Parasitosis

    J. New York Entomol. Soc. 112(1):87–95, 2004 COLLEMBOLA (SPRINGTAILS) (ARTHROPODA: HEXAPODA: ENTOGNATHA) FOUND IN SCRAPINGS FROM INDIVIDUALS DIAGNOSED WITH DELUSORY PARASITOSIS 1 2 DEBORAH Z. ALTSCHULER, MICHAEL CRUTCHER, MD, MPH, FACPM, 3 1 NECULAI DULCEANU, DVM, PHD(DECEASED), BETH A. CERVANTES, 4 5 CRISTINA TERINTE, MD, PHD AND LOUIS N. SORKIN, BCE 1National Pediculosis Association, 50 Kearney Road, Needham, Massachusetts 02494; 2Commissioner of Health, Oklahoma State Department of Health, 1000 NE 10th Street, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73117; 3Department of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Iasi, Romania; 4Department of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania; and 5Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024-5192 Abstract.—Twenty individuals diagnosed with delusory parasitosis participated in a single site clinical study under the auspices of the National Pediculosis Association (NPA) and the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The objective of this study was to determine if there were any common factors in skin scrapings collected from this population. These individuals, whose symptoms were originally attributed to lice or scabies, were part of a larger group reporting symptoms of stinging/biting and/or crawling to the NPA. Multiple skin scrapings from each person were microscopically examined. Any and all fields of view that appeared incongruous to normal human skin were digitally photographed. When the photographic images were initially evaluated, no common factor was identified. However, more extensive scrutiny using imaging software revealed evidence of Collembola in 18 of the 20 participants. Key words: Collembola, springtail, stinging, biting, crawling, Arthropoda, Hexapoda, Entognatha, pediculosis, human skin, lice and scabies.
  • Standardised Arthropod (Arthropoda) Inventory Across Natural and Anthropogenic Impacted Habitats in the Azores Archipelago

    Standardised Arthropod (Arthropoda) Inventory Across Natural and Anthropogenic Impacted Habitats in the Azores Archipelago

    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e62157 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e62157 Data Paper Standardised arthropod (Arthropoda) inventory across natural and anthropogenic impacted habitats in the Azores archipelago José Marcelino‡, Paulo A. V. Borges§,|, Isabel Borges ‡, Enésima Pereira§‡, Vasco Santos , António Onofre Soares‡ ‡ cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes / Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores, Rua Madre de Deus, 9500, Ponta Delgada, Portugal § cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes / Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores, Rua Capitão João d’Ávila, São Pedro, 9700-042, Angra do Heroismo, Portugal | IUCN SSC Mid-Atlantic Islands Specialist Group, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal Corresponding author: Paulo A. V. Borges ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pedro Cardoso Received: 17 Dec 2020 | Accepted: 15 Feb 2021 | Published: 10 Mar 2021 Citation: Marcelino J, Borges PAV, Borges I, Pereira E, Santos V, Soares AO (2021) Standardised arthropod (Arthropoda) inventory across natural and anthropogenic impacted habitats in the Azores archipelago. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e62157. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e62157 Abstract Background In this paper, we present an extensive checklist of selected arthropods and their distribution in five Islands of the Azores (Santa Maria. São Miguel, Terceira, Flores and Pico). Habitat surveys included five herbaceous and four arboreal habitat types, scaling up from native to anthropogenic managed habitats. We aimed to contribute
  • Table 3A Last Updated:10 December 2019

    Table 3A Last Updated:10 December 2019

    IUCN Red List version 2019-3: Table 3a Last Updated:10 December 2019 Table 3a: Status category summary by major taxonomic group (animals) Subtotal** Subtotal Subtotal Class* EX EW CR(PE)** CR(PEW)** (EX+EW+ CR EN VU NT LR/cd DD LC Total (EX+EW) (threatened spp.) CR(PE)+CR(PEW)) MAMMALIA 81 2 83 00 83 203 505 536 1,244 345 0 872 3,306 5,850 AVES 159 5 164 00 164 225 461 800 1,486 1,017 0 53 8,427 11,147 REPTILIA 30 3 33 00 33 309 565 535 1,409 432 2 1,159 4,794 7,829 AMPHIBIA 33 2 35 00 35 588 964 648 2,200 374 0 1,370 2,815 6,794 CEPHALASPIDOMORPHI 10 1 00 1 242 8 30 3 22 37 MYXINI 00 0 00 0 126 9 2030 35 76 CHONDRICHTHYES 00 0 00 0 42 57 107 206 112 0 438 368 1,124 ACTINOPTERYGII 62 10 72 00 72 546 804 1,098 2,448 556 1 3,510 11,368 17,955 SARCOPTERYGII 00 0 00 0 111 3 00 0 4 7 HOLOTHUROIDEA 00 0 00 0 079 16 00244 111 371 ECHINOIDEA 00 0 00 0 000 0 10 0 0 1 ARACHNIDA 90 9 00 9 60 84 53 197 10 0 39 89 344 CHILOPODA 00 0 00 0 351 9 00 0 1 10 DIPLOPODA 30 3 00 3 34 32 18 84 42 0 34 37 200 ENTOGNATHA 00 0 00 0 202 4 20 0 0 6 BRANCHIOPODA 00 0 00 0 61022 38 11 1 1 42 MALACOSTRACA 71 8 00 8 138 161 307 606 71 0 1,132 1,199 3,016 MAXILLOPODA 20 2 00 2 7071 78 0822 0 110 OSTRACODA 20 2 00 2 209 11 00 0 0 13 INSECTA 62 1 63 00 63 311 571 765 1,647 545 3 2,227 4,211 8,696 MEROSTOMATA 00 0 00 0 011 2 00 2 0 4 ONYCHOPHORA 00 0 00 0 324 9 10 1 0 11 CLITELLATA 20 2 00 2 6138 27 12 0 107 74 222 POLYCHAETA 00 0 00 0 100 1 00 1 0 2 BIVALVIA 32 0 32 00 32 74 62 55 191 56 4 170 341 794 GASTROPODA 267 14 281 00 281 592 500 962 2,054 626 0 1,632 2,612 7,205
  • Insect Glycerol Transporters Evolved by Functional Co-Option and Gene Replacement

    Insect Glycerol Transporters Evolved by Functional Co-Option and Gene Replacement

    ARTICLE Received 3 Mar 2015 | Accepted 12 Jun 2015 | Published 17 Jul 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8814 OPEN Insect glycerol transporters evolved by functional co-option and gene replacement Roderick Nigel Finn1,2, Franc¸ois Chauvigne´1,3, Jon Anders Stavang1, Xavier Belles4 & Joan Cerda`3 Transmembrane glycerol transport is typically facilitated by aquaglyceroporins in Prokaryota and Eukaryota. In holometabolan insects however, aquaglyceroporins are absent, yet several species possess polyol permeable aquaporins. It thus remains unknown how glycerol transport evolved in the Holometabola. By combining phylogenetic and functional studies, here we show that a more efficient form of glycerol transporter related to the water-selective channel AQP4 specifically evolved and multiplied in the insect lineage, resulting in the replacement of the ancestral branch of aquaglyceroporins in holometabolan insects. To recapitulate this evolutionary process, we generate specific mutants in distantly related insect aquaporins and human AQP4 and show that a single mutation in the selectivity filter con- verted a water-selective channel into a glycerol transporter at the root of the crown clade of hexapod insects. Integration of phanerozoic climate models suggests that these events were associated with the emergence of complete metamorphosis and the unparalleled radiation of insects. 1 Department of Biology, Bergen High Technology Center, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, N-5020 Bergen, Norway. 2 Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway. 3 Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimenta`ries (IRTA)-Institut de Cie`ncies del Mar, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas (CSIC), Passeig Marı´tim 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. 4 Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marı´tim 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
  • ABSTRACTS Edited by Paul C

    ABSTRACTS Edited by Paul C

    ABSTRACTS Edited by Paul C. Nascimbene 8th International Conference on Fossil Insects, Arthropods & Amber | Edited by Paul C. Nascimbene 1 8th International conference on fossil insects, arthropods and amber. Santo Domingo 2019 Abstracts Book ISBN 978-9945-9194-0-0 Edited by Paul C. Nascimbene Amber World Museum Fundación para el Desarrollo de la Artesanía International Palaeoentomological society Available at www.amberworldmuseum.com Contents Abstracts organized alphabetically by author (* denotes the presenter) IPS President’s Address Pages 3-5 Keynote Presentations Pages 6-15 Talks Pages 16-100 Posters Pages 101-138 8th International Conference on Fossil Insects, Arthropods & Amber | Edited by Paul C. Nascimbene 1 IPS President’s Address 2 8th International Conference on Fossil Insects, Arthropods & Amber | Edited by Paul C. Nascimbene “Palaeoentomology”: An advanced traditional science dealing with the past with modern technologies Dany Azar: President of the International Palaeoentomological Society *Lebanese University, Faculty of Science II, Fanar, Natural Sciences Department, Fanar - El- Matn, PO box 26110217, Lebanon. Palaeoentomology began formally in the late XVIIIth Century with publications on fossil insects in amber. At the start of the XIXth Century, the first studies and descriptions of insects from sedimentary rocks appeared. This discipline then developed during the XIXth and beginning of the XXth centuries, and resulted in major works and reviews. The end of the XXth and the beginning of XXIst centuries (especially after the famous film “Jurassic Park,” produced by Steven Spielberg in 1993 and based on the eponymous novel of Michael Crichton, together with the discovery of new rock and amber outcrops with fossil insects of different geological ages in various parts of the world), witnessed a significant and exponential growth of the science of palaeoentomology resulting in a huge amount of high- quality international scientific work, using the most advanced analytical, phylogenetic and imaging techniques.