DOCSLIB.ORG

Models of Extinction 14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Models of Extinction 14 Models of Extinction A Review M. E. J. Newman and R. G. Palmer Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501. U.S.A. Abstract We review recent work aimed at modelling species extinction over geological time. We discuss a number of models which, rather than dealing with the direct causes of particular extinction events, attempt to predict overall statistical trends, such as the relative frequencies of large and small extinctions, or the distribution of the lifetimes of species, genera or higher taxa. We also describe the available fossil and other data, and compare the trends visible in these data with the predictions of the models. arXiv:adap-org/9908002v1 6 Aug 1999 Contents 1 Causes of extinction 3 2 The data 4 2.1 Fossildata........................................ .......... 4 2.1.1 Biases in the fossil data . ........ 4 2.2 Trendsinthefossildata .............................. ............ 6 2.2.1 Extinctionrates ................................... ....... 6 2.2.2 Extinction periodicity . ....... 8 2.2.3 Origination and diversity . ....... 9 2.2.4 Taxon lifetimes . ...... 10 2.2.5 Pseudoextinction and paraphyly . .......... 11 2.3 Otherformsofdata ................................. ........... 12 2.3.1 Taxonomicdata .................................... ...... 12 2.3.2 Artificial life . ..... 13 3 Early models of extinction 14 4 Fitness landscape models 15 4.1 TheNKmodel ....................................... ........ 15 4.2 EvolutiononNKlandscapes............................. ........... 17 4.3 Coevolvingfitnesslandscapes . ............. 18 4.4 Coevolutionaryavalanches. ............. 19 4.5 Competitivereplacement.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............ 20 5 The Bak–Sneppen model and variations 22 5.1 TheBak–Sneppenmodel.............................. ............ 22 5.2 Self-organized criticality . ............ 23 5.3 Time-scales for crossing barriers . ............... 26 5.4 The exactly solvable multi-trait model . ............. 26 5.5 Models incorporating speciation . ............. 27 5.6 Modelincorporatingexternalstress. ................. 29 6 Inter-species connection models 30 6.1 TheSol´e–Manrubiamodel. ............. 31 6.2 VariationsontheSol´e–Manrubiamodel . ............... 33 6.3 AmaralandMeyer’sfoodchainmodel . ............. 33 6.4 Abramson’sfoodchainmodel . ............ 34 7 Environmental stress models 35 7.1 Newman’smodel ..................................... ......... 35 7.2 Shortcomingsofthemodel. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............. 38 7.3 The multi-trait version of the model . ............. 38 7.4 Thefinite-growthversionofthemodel . ............... 39 7.5 ThemodelofManrubiaandPaczuski . ............. 39 8 Sibani’s reset model 40 8.1 Extinction rate decline . ........... 41 8.2 Theresetmodel .................................... .......... 42 8.3 Extinctionmechanisms................................ ........... 43 9 Conclusions 43 References 45 1 Causes of extinction 3 Of the estimated one to four billion species which accepted (Glen 1994), but almost all of the alterna- have existed on the Earth since life first appeared here tives are also exogenous in nature, ranging from the (Simpson 1952), less than 50 million are still alive to- mundane (climate change (Stanley 1984, 1988), ocean day (May 1990). All the others became extinct, typi- anoxia (Wilde and Berry 1984)) to the exotic (volcan- cally within about ten million years (My) of their first ism (Duncan and Pyle 1988, Courtillot et al. 1988), appearance. It is clearly a question of some interest tidal waves (Bourgeois et al. 1988), magnetic field re- what the causes are of this high turnover, and much versal (Raup 1985, Loper et al. 1988), supernovae (El- research has been devoted to the topic (see for ex- lis and Schramm 1995)). There seems to be little dis- ample Raup (1991a) and Glen (1994) and references agreement that, whatever the causes of these mass ex- therein). Most of this work has focussed on the causes tinction events, they are the result of some change in of extinction of individual species, or on the causes of the environment. However, the mass extinction events identifiable mass extinction events, such as the end- account for only about 35% of the total extinction ev- Cretaceous event. However, a recent body of work has ident in the fossil record at the family level, and for examined instead the statistical features of the history the remaining 65% we have no firm evidence favouring of extinction, using mathematical models of extinction one cause over another. Many believe, nonetheless, processes and comparing their predictions with global that all extinction can be accounted for by environ- properties of the fossil record. In this paper we review mental stress on the ecosystem. The extreme point of a number of these models, describing their mathemat- view has been put forward (though not entirely seri- ical basis, the extinction mechanisms which they in- ously) by Raup (1992), who used statistical analyses corporate, and their predictions. We also discuss the of fossil extinction and of the effects of asteroid impact trends in fossil and other data which they attempt to to show that, within the accuracy of our present data, predict and ask how well they achieve that goal. As it is conceivable that all terrestrial extinction has been we will see, a number of them give results which are in caused by meteors and comets. This however is more a reasonable agreement with the general features of the demonstration of the uncertainty in our present knowl- data. edge of the frequency of impacts and their biotic effects The outline of the paper is as follows. In Section 1 than a realistic theory. we give a brief synopsis of the current debate over the At the other end of the scale, an increasing num- causes of extinction. In Section 2 we describe the fos- ber of biologists and ecologists are supporting the idea sil record as it pertains to the models we will be dis- that extinction has biotic causes—that extinction is a cussing, as well as a number of other types of data natural part of the dynamics of ecosystems and would which have been cited in support of these models. In take place regardless of any stresses arising from the Sections 3 to 8 we describe in detail the modelling environment. There is evidence in favour of this view- work which is the principal topic of this review, start- point also, although it is to a large extent anecdotal. ing with early work such as that of Willis (1922) and Maynard Smith (1989) has given a variety of different van Valen (1973), but concentrating mainly on new re- examples of modern-day extinctions caused entirely by sults from the last five years or so. In Section 9 we give species interactions, such as the effects of overzealous our conclusions. predators, or the introduction of new competitors into formerly stable systems. The problem is that extinc- tion events of this nature usually involve no more than 1 Causes of extinction a handful of species at the most, and are therefore too small to be picked out over the “background” level of There are two primary colleges of thought about the extinction in the fossil data, making it difficult to say causes of extinction. The traditional view, still held with any certainty whether they constitute an impor- by most palaeontologists as well as many in other tant part of this background extinction. (The distinc- disciplines, is that extinction is the result of exter- tion between mass and background extinction events nal stresses imposed on the ecosystem by the environ- is discussed in more detail in Section 2.2.1.) The re- ment (Benton 1991, Hoffmann and Parsons 1991, Par- cent modelling work which is the primary focus of this sons 1993). There are indeed excellent arguments in review attempts to address this question by looking in- favour of this viewpoint, since we have good evidence stead at statistical trends in the extinction record, such for particular exogenous causes for a number of major as the relative frequencies of large and small extinction extinction events in the Earth’s history, such as marine events. Using models which make predictions about regression (sea-level drop) for the late-Permian event these trends and comparing the results against fossil (Jablonski 1985, Hallam 1989), and bolide impact for and other data, we can judge whether the assump- the end-Cretaceous (Alvarez et al. 1980, Alvarez 1983, tions which go into the models are plausible. Some 1987). These explanations are by no means universally 4 2 The data of the models which we discuss are based on purely morously referred to as the “Lipps–Signor” effect, is biotic extinction mechanisms, others on abiotic ones, seen in the origination times of taxa, which in general and still others on some mixture of the two. Whilst the err on the late side in poorly represented taxa. By results of this work are by no means conclusive yet— grouping fossil species into higher taxa, we can work there are a number of models based on different extinc- with denser data sets which give more accurate esti- tion mechanisms which agree moderately well with the mates of origination and extinction dates, at the ex- data—there has been some encouraging progress, and pense of throwing out any information which is spe- it seems a promising line of research. cific to the lower taxonomic levels (Raup and Boya- jian 1988). (Higher taxa do, however, suffer from a greater tendency to paraphyly—see the discussion of 2 The data pseudoextinction in Section 2.2.5.) In this section we review the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lineages, Splits and Divergence Challenge Whether the Terms Anagenesis and Cladogenesis Are Necessary
    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, , – . With 2 figures. Lineages, splits and divergence challenge whether the terms anagenesis and cladogenesis are necessary FELIX VAUX*, STEVEN A. TREWICK and MARY MORGAN-RICHARDS Ecology Group, Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Received 3 June 2015; revised 22 July 2015; accepted for publication 22 July 2015 Using the framework of evolutionary lineages to separate the process of evolution and classification of species, we observe that ‘anagenesis’ and ‘cladogenesis’ are unnecessary terms. The terms have changed significantly in meaning over time, and current usage is inconsistent and vague across many different disciplines. The most popular definition of cladogenesis is the splitting of evolutionary lineages (cessation of gene flow), whereas anagenesis is evolutionary change between splits. Cladogenesis (and lineage-splitting) is also regularly made synonymous with speciation. This definition is misleading as lineage-splitting is prolific during evolution and because palaeontological studies provide no direct estimate of gene flow. The terms also fail to incorporate speciation without being arbitrary or relative, and the focus upon lineage-splitting ignores the importance of divergence, hybridization, extinction and informative value (i.e. what is helpful to describe as a taxon) for species classification. We conclude and demonstrate that evolution and species diversity can be considered with greater clarity using simpler, more transparent terms than anagenesis and cladogenesis. Describing evolution and taxonomic classification can be straightforward, and there is no need to ‘make words mean so many different things’. © 2015 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 00, 000–000.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Post-Phylogenetic Systematics
    A FRAMEWORK FOR POST-PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS Richard H. Zander Zetetic Publications, St. Louis Richard H. Zander Missouri Botanical Garden P.O. Box 299 St. Louis, MO 63166 [email protected] Zetetic Publications in St. Louis produces but does not sell this book. Any book dealer can obtain a copy for you through the usual channels. Resellers please contact CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform of Amazon. ISBN-13: 978-1492220404 ISBN-10: 149222040X © Copyright 2013, all rights reserved. The image on the cover and title page is a stylized dendrogram of paraphyly (see Plate 1.1). This is, in macroevolutionary terms, an ancestral taxon of two (or more) species or of molecular strains of one taxon giving rise to a descendant taxon (unconnected comma) from one ancestral branch. The image on the back cover is a stylized dendrogram of two, genus-level speciational bursts or dis- silience. Here, the dissilient genus is the basic evolutionary unit (see Plate 13.1). This evolutionary model is evident in analysis of the moss Didymodon (Chapter 8) through superoptimization. A super- generative core species with a set of radiative, specialized descendant species in the stylized tree com- promises one genus. In this exemplary image; another genus of similar complexity is generated by the core supergenerative species of the first. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Symbiont Extinction Risk Using Cophylogenetic Data 2 3 Jorge Doña1 and Kevin P
    1 Assessing symbiont extinction risk using cophylogenetic data 2 3 Jorge Doña1 and Kevin P. Johnson1 4 5 1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 6 1816 S. Oak St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA 7 8 *Corresponding authors: Jorge Doña & Kevin Johnson; e-mail: [email protected] & [email protected] 9 10 Abstract: Symbionts have a unique mode of life that has attracted the attention of ecologists and 11 evolutionary biologists for centuries. As a result of this attention, these disciplines have produced 12 a mature body of literature on host-symbiont interactions. In contrast, the discipline of symbiont 13 conservation is still in a foundational stage. Here, we aim to integrate methodologies on symbiont 14 coevolutionary biology with the perspective of conservation. We focus on host-symbiont 15 cophylogenies, because they have been widely used to study symbiont diversification history and 16 contain information on symbiont extinction. However, cophylogenetic information has never been 17 used nor adapted to the perspective of conservation. Here, we propose a new statistic, 18 “cophylogenetic extinction rate” (Ec), based on coevolutionary knowledge, that uses data from 19 event-based cophylogenetic analyses, and which could be informative to assess relative symbiont 20 extinction risks. Finally, we propose potential future research to further develop estimation of 21 symbiont extinction risk from cophylogenetic analyses and continue the integration of this existing 22 knowledge of coevolutionary biology and cophylogenetics into future symbiont conservation 23 studies and practices. 24 25 Keywords: coevolution, coextinction risk, conservation biology, cophylogenies, host-symbiont 26 interactions, parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches to Macroevolution: 2. Sorting of Variation, Some Overarching Issues, and General Conclusions
    Evol Biol (2017) 44:451–475 DOI 10.1007/s11692-017-9434-7 SYNTHESIS PAPER Approaches to Macroevolution: 2. Sorting of Variation, Some Overarching Issues, and General Conclusions David Jablonski1 Received: 31 August 2017 / Accepted: 4 October 2017 / Published online: 24 October 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Approaches to macroevolution require integra- edges of apparent trends. Biotic interactions can have nega- tion of its two fundamental components, within a hierarchi- tive or positive effects on taxonomic diversity within a clade, cal framework. Following a companion paper on the origin but cannot be readily extrapolated from the nature of such of variation, I here discuss sorting within an evolutionary interactions at the organismic level. The relationships among hierarchy. Species sorting—sometimes termed species selec- macroevolutionary currencies through time (taxonomic rich- tion in the broad sense, meaning differential origination and ness, morphologic disparity, functional variety) are crucial extinction owing to intrinsic biological properties—can be for understanding the nature of evolutionary diversification. split into strict-sense species selection, in which rate differ- A novel approach to diversity-disparity analysis shows that entials are governed by emergent, species-level traits such as taxonomic diversifications can lag behind, occur in concert geographic range size, and effect macroevolution, in which with, or precede, increases in disparity. Some overarching rates are governed by organism-level traits such as body issues relating to both the origin and sorting of clades and size; both processes can create hitchhiking effects, indirectly phenotypes include the macroevolutionary role of mass causing the proliferation or decline of other traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Darwin's Finches and Their Native Ectoparasites Survive the Control of Th
    Insect Conservation and Diversity (2017) 10, 193–199 doi: 10.1111/icad.12219 FORUM & POLICY Coextinction dilemma in the Galapagos Islands: Can Darwin’s finches and their native ectoparasites survive the control of the introduced fly Philornis downsi? 1 2 MARIANA BULGARELLA and RICARDO L. PALMA 1School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand and 2Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington, New Zealand Abstract. 1. The survival of parasites is threatened directly by environmental alter- ation and indirectly by all the threats acting upon their hosts, facing coextinction. 2. The fate of Darwin’s finches and their native ectoparasites in the Galapagos Islands is uncertain because of an introduced avian parasitic fly, Philornis downsi, which could potentially drive them to extinction. 3. We documented all known native ectoparasites of Darwin’s finches. Thir- teen species have been found: nine feather mites, three feather lice and one nest mite. No ticks or fleas have been recorded from them yet. 4. Management options being considered to control P. downsi include the use of the insecticide permethrin in bird nests which would not only kill the invasive fly larvae but the birds’ native ectoparasites too. 5. Parasites should be targeted for conservation in a manner equal to that of their hosts. We recommend steps to consider if permethrin-treated cotton sta- tions are to be deployed in the Galapagos archipelago to manage P. downsi. Key words. Chewing lice, coextinction, Darwin’s finches, dilemma, ectoparasites, feather mites, Galapagos Islands, permethrin, Philornis downsi. Introduction species have closely associated species which are also endangered (Dunn et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • A Model of Mass Extinction
    A model of mass extinction M. E. J. Newman Cornell Theory Center, Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853. and Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501. Abstract A number of authors have in recent years proposed that the processes of macroevo- lution may give rise to self-organized critical phenomena which could have a sig- nificant effect on the dynamics of ecosystems. In particular it has been suggested that mass extinction may arise through a purely biotic mechanism as the result of so-called coevolutionary avalanches. In this paper we first explore the empirical evidence which has been put forward in favor of this conclusion. The data center principally around the existence of power-law functional forms in the distribution of the sizes of extinction events and other quantities. We then propose a new math- ematical model of mass extinction which does not rely on coevolutionary effects and in which extinction is caused entirely by the action of environmental stresses on species. In combination with a simple model of species adaptation we show that this process can account for all the observed data without the need to invoke coevo- lution and critical processes. The model also makes some independent predictions, such as the existence of “aftershock” extinctions in the aftermath of large mass extinction events, which should in theory be testable against the fossil record. arXiv:adap-org/9702003v1 12 Feb 1997 1 Introduction Building on ideas first put forward by Kauffman (1992), there has in re- cent years been increasing interest in the possibility that evolution may be a self-organized critical phenomenon (Sol´eand Bascompte 1996, Bak and Paczuski 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Paradigms for Parasite Conservation
    Paradigms for parasite conservation Running Head: Parasite conservation Keywords: parasitology; disease ecology; food webs; economic valuation; ex situ conservation; population viability analysis 1*† 1† 2 2 Eric R. Dougherty , Colin J. Carlson , Veronica M. Bueno , Kevin R. Burgio , Carrie A. Cizauskas3, Christopher F. Clements4, Dana P. Seidel1, Nyeema C. Harris5 1Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley; 130 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut; 75 N. Eagleville Rd, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA. 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University; 106A Guyton Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. 4Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich; Winterthurerstrasse 190 CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland. 5Luc Hoffmann Institute, WWF International 1196, Gland, Switzerland. *email [email protected] † These authors share lead author status This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/cobi.12634. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 28 Abstract Parasitic species, which depend directly on host species for their survival, represent a major regulatory force in ecosystems and a significant component of Earth’s biodiversity. Yet the negative impacts of parasites observed at the host level have motivated a conservation paradigm of eradication, moving us further from attainment of taxonomically unbiased conservation goals. Despite a growing body of literature highlighting the importance of parasite-inclusive conservation, most parasite species remain understudied, underfunded, and underappreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2009
    Coaster Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) 12-Month Finding Decision Document SEPTEMBER 2009 0 Coaster Brook Trout 12-Month Finding Decsion Document TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 DECISION STRUCTURE ........................................................................................................................................... 4 DECISION PROBLEM .................................................................................................................................................... 5 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 CONSEQUENCES ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 TRADE-OFFS .............................................................................................................................................................. 13 DISTINCT POPULATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasting Extinctions: Uncertainties and Limitations
    Diversity 2009, 1, 133-150; doi:10.3390/d1020133 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Review Forecasting Extinctions: Uncertainties and Limitations Richard J. Ladle 1,2 1 School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-31-3899 1902; Fax: +55-31-3899-2735 2 Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil Received: 13 October 2009 / Accepted: 14 November 2009 / Published: 26 November 2009 Abstract: Extinction forecasting is one of the most important and challenging areas of conservation biology. Overestimates of extinction rates or the extinction risk of a particular species instigate accusations of hype and overblown conservation rhetoric. Conversely, underestimates may result in limited resources being allocated to other species/habitats perceived as being at greater risk. In this paper I review extinction models and identify the key sources of uncertainty for each. All reviewed methods which claim to estimate extinction probabilities have severe limitations, independent of if they are based on ecological theory or on rather subjective expert judgments. Keywords: extinction; uncertainty; forecasting; local extinction; viability 1. Introduction ―Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future‖ Nils Bohr, Nobel Prize winning physicist Preventing the extinction of species is probably the most emblematic objective of the global conservation movement. To fulfill this aim effectively requires that decision makers and environmental managers are provided with accurate information on: (1) the identities of specific species/populations with a high probability of going extinct without further interventions; (2) the predicted rates of extinction among a range of taxa in different geographic areas and biomes under various ecological scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Speciation Free Download
    SPECIATION FREE DOWNLOAD Jerry A. Coyne,H. Allen Orr | 480 pages | 09 Apr 2010 | Sinauer Associates Inc.,U.S. | 9780878930890 | English | Sunderland, United States speciation Categories : Speciation Ecology Evolutionary biology Sexual selection. Molecular Ecology. Hybrid zones are regions where diverged populations meet and interbreed. A Series of Books in Biology. John L. Buffalo grass seeds pass on the characteristics of the members in that region to offspring. Though vital to the concept of evolution, the Speciation "species" has been defined several different ways throughout history. Anolis lizardsa classroom activity for grades Speciation 30, Adaptation Natural selection Sexual selection Ecological speciation Assortative mating Haldane's rule. If an isolated population such as this survives its genetic upheavalsand subsequently expands into an unoccupied niche, or into a niche in which it has an advantage over its competitors, a new species, or subspecies, will Speciation come in being. The first and most commonly used sense refers to the "birth" of new species. Speciation possible Speciation of sympatric speciation is the apple maggot, an insect that lays its eggs inside the fruit of an apple, causing it to rot. Defining a species. See Speciation, and Darwin's dilemma. Pretty Fly The Hawaiian islands are home to Speciation of the most stunning Speciation of speciation. Ancestral wild cabbage. Plant Speciation. View Article. Princeton University Press. Fields and applications Applications of evolution Biosocial criminology Ecological genetics Evolutionary Speciation Evolutionary anthropology Evolutionary Speciation Evolutionary ecology Evolutionary economics Evolutionary epistemology Evolutionary ethics Evolutionary game theory Evolutionary linguistics Evolutionary medicine Evolutionary neuroscience Evolutionary physiology Evolutionary psychology Experimental evolution Phylogenetics Paleontology Selective breeding Speciation experiments Sociobiology Systematics Universal Darwinism.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Size and the Extinction of Small Populations
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/173690; this version posted August 8, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Genome size and the extinction of small populations Thomas LaBar1;2;3, Christoph Adami1;2;3;4 1 Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics 2 BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action 3 Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 Abstract Species extinction is ubiquitous throughout the history of life. Understanding the factors that cause some species to go extinct while others survive will help us manage Earth's present-day biodiversity. Most studies of extinction focus on inferring causal factors from past extinction events, but these studies are constrained by our inability to observe extinction events as they occur. Here, we use digital experimental evolution to avoid these constraints and study \extinction in action". Previous digital evolution experiments have shown that strong genetic drift in small populations led to larger genomes, greater phenotypic complexity, and high extinction rates. Here we show that this elevated extinction rate is a consequence of genome expansions and a con- current increase in the genomic mutation rate. High genomic mutation rates increase the lethal mutation rate, leading to an increase the likelihood of a mutational melt- down. Genome expansions contribute to this lethal mutational load because genome expansions increase the likelihood of lethal mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Evolution Above the Species Level (Paleontology/Paleobiology/Speciation) STEVEN M
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 646-650, February 1975 A Theory of Evolution Above the Species Level (paleontology/paleobiology/speciation) STEVEN M. STANLEY Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218 Communicated by Hanm P. Eugster, December 11, 1974 ABSTRACT Gradual evolutionary change by natural lished species are seen as occasionally becoming separated by selection operates so slowly within established species to form new species. Most isolates become that it cannot account for the major features of evolution. geographic barriers Evolutionary change tends to be concentrated within extinct, but occasionally one succeeds in blossoming into a speciation events. The direction of transpecific evolution is new species by evolving adaptations to its marginal environ- determined by the process of species selection, which is ment and diverging to a degree that interbreeding with the analogous to natural selection but acts upon species within original population is no longer possible. Mayr has empha- higher taxa rather than upon individuals within popula- tions. Species selection operates on variation provided sized the stability of the genotype of a typical established by the largely random process of speciation and favors species. Most species occupy heterogeneous environments species that speciate at high rates or survive for long within which selection pressures differ from place to place and periods and therefore tend to leave many daughter species. oppose each other through gene flow. Furthermore, biochemi- Rates of speciation can be estimated for living taxa by cal systems interact in complex ways. Most genes affect means of the equation for exponential increase, and are clearly higher for mammals than for bivalve mollusks.
    [Show full text]