DOCSLIB.ORG

Can Darwin's Finches and Their Native Ectoparasites Survive the Control of Th

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Can Darwin's Finches and Their Native Ectoparasites Survive the Control of Th Insect Conservation and Diversity (2017) 10, 193–199 doi: 10.1111/icad.12219 FORUM & POLICY Coextinction dilemma in the Galapagos Islands: Can Darwin’s finches and their native ectoparasites survive the control of the introduced fly Philornis downsi? 1 2 MARIANA BULGARELLA and RICARDO L. PALMA 1School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand and 2Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington, New Zealand Abstract. 1. The survival of parasites is threatened directly by environmental alter- ation and indirectly by all the threats acting upon their hosts, facing coextinction. 2. The fate of Darwin’s finches and their native ectoparasites in the Galapagos Islands is uncertain because of an introduced avian parasitic fly, Philornis downsi, which could potentially drive them to extinction. 3. We documented all known native ectoparasites of Darwin’s finches. Thir- teen species have been found: nine feather mites, three feather lice and one nest mite. No ticks or fleas have been recorded from them yet. 4. Management options being considered to control P. downsi include the use of the insecticide permethrin in bird nests which would not only kill the invasive fly larvae but the birds’ native ectoparasites too. 5. Parasites should be targeted for conservation in a manner equal to that of their hosts. We recommend steps to consider if permethrin-treated cotton sta- tions are to be deployed in the Galapagos archipelago to manage P. downsi. Key words. Chewing lice, coextinction, Darwin’s finches, dilemma, ectoparasites, feather mites, Galapagos Islands, permethrin, Philornis downsi. Introduction species have closely associated species which are also endangered (Dunn et al., 2009). The same threats affecting Coextinction refers to the loss of one species as the result of free-living species such as global warming and ecosystem the extinction of another species it depends on (Stork & disturbance, reduce the abundance and diversity of parasites Lyal, 1993). This is a process with cascading effects across as well (Bradley & Altizer, 2007; Bush et al., 2013). Thus, trophic levels (Dunn et al., 2009); losing one species from parasites are directly threatened by environmental alteration the ecosystem may imply losing others consequently and indirectly by all the threats acting upon their hosts (Col- because organisms are interconnected (Koh et al., 2004). well et al., 2012; Gomez & Nichols, 2013). A compounded Coextinctions represent a loss of evolutionary history (Pur- effect of the threats experienced by avian hosts, for example, vis et al., 2000), and they might be the most common form would mean that climate change poses a serious threat to the of biodiversity loss, according to different mathematical smaller parasite fauna on polar and temperate regions, while models (Koh et al., 2004; Dunn, 2005, 2009). Documented habitat destruction would be the main threat to parasites in cases of coextinction are, however, extremely scarce (Dunn tropical regions (Dobson et al., 2008). et al., 2009). Either coextinctions are common but happen Until recently, the idea of protecting parasites has not undetected or, they are rare because parasites adapt quickly been a priority for conservation efforts (Durden & Keir- and are more plastic than it is thought (Dunn et al., 2009). ans, 1996) because there is a bias towards conserving free- Tens of thousands of parasites are likely to have disap- living species (Windsor, 1990, 1995) to whom humans can peared due to coextinction and many endangered host put an emotional or recreational value. As an example, the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species only includes one parasite species as endangered (Whiteman & Parker, Correspondence: Mariana Bulgarella, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 2005; Dunn et al., 2009). Parasitic organisms form great 6140, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] part of biodiversity (Price, 1980). Besides having Ó 2017 The Royal Entomological Society 193 194 Mariana Bulgarella and Ricardo L. Palma Table 1. List of ectoparasites recorded from Darwin’s finches in the Galapagos Islands (Records due to natural straggling or contamina- tion by human agency have not been included). Common name Order Family Species Host species References Feather Sarcoptiformes Psoroptoididae Mesalgoides geospizae Geospiza conirostris Mironov and Perez (2002) mite Geospiza fortis O’Connor et al. (2005) Geospiza fuliginosa Villa et al. (2013) Geospiza magnirostris Geospiza scandens Camarhynchus parvulus Camarhynchus pallidus Camarhynchus psittacula Platyspiza crassirostris Certhidea olivacea Feather Sarcoptiformes Xolalgidae Xolalgoides palmai Geospiza fortis Mironov and Perez (2002) mite Geospiza fuliginosa O’Connor et al. (2005) Geospiza magnirostris Villa et al. (2013) Geospiza scandens Camarhynchus parvulus Camarhynchus psittacula Platyspiza crassirostris Certhidea olivacea Feather Sarcoptiformes Trouessartiidae Trouessartia geospiza Geospiza fortis O’Connor et al. (2005) mite Geospiza fuliginosa Lindstrom€ et al. (2009) Geospiza magnirostris Villa et al. (2013) Geospiza scandens Camarhynchus parvulus Camarhynchus pallidus Camarhynchus psittacula Platyspiza crassirostris Certhidea olivacea Feather Sarcoptiformes Proctophyllodidae Proctophyllodes darwini Geospiza fortis O’Connor et al. (2005) mite Geospiza fuliginosa Villa et al. (2013) Geospiza magnirostris Geospiza scandens Camarhynchus parvulus Camarhynchus pallidus Camarhynchus psittacula Platyspiza crassirostris Certhidea olivacea Feather Sarcoptiformes Proctophyllodidae Amerodectes atyeoi Geospiza difficilis O’Connor et al. mite Geospiza fortis (2005, as Pterodectes) Geospiza fuliginosa Villa et al. (2013) Geospiza magnirostris Geospiza scandens Camarhynchus parvulus Camarhynchus pallidus Camarhynchus psittacula Platyspiza crassirostris Certhidea olivacea Feather Sarcoptiformes Analgidae Strelkoviacarus sp. Geospiza fortis O’Connor et al. (2005) mite Geospiza fuliginosa Villa et al. (2013) Camarhynchus parvulus Certhidea olivacea Feather Sarcoptiformes Analgidae Analges sp. Certhidea olivacea Villa et al. (2013) mite Feather Sarcoptiformes Dermoglyphidae Dermoglyphus sp. Geospiza fortis O’Connor et al. (2005) mite Geospiza fuliginosa Villa et al. (2013) Geospiza scandens (continued) Ó 2017 The Royal Entomological Society, Insect Conservation and Diversity, 10, 193–199 Conserving native ectoparasites of Darwin’s finches 195 Table 1. (continued) Common name Order Family Species Host species References Camarhynchus pallidus Platyspiza crassirostris Nest Parasitiformes Dermanyssidae Dermanyssus sp. Geospiza fuliginosa O’Connor et al. (2005) mite Feather Phthiraptera Menoponidae Myrsidea darwini Geospiza fuliginosa Palma and Price (2010) louse Geospiza magnirostris Palma and Peck (2013) Camarhynchus psittacula Feather Phthiraptera Philopteridae Brueelia chelydensis Geospiza conirostris Palma and Peck (2013) louse Geospiza difficilis Geospiza fortis Geospiza fuliginosa Geospiza magnirostris Camarhynchus pallidus Camarhynchus parvulus Camarhynchus psittacula Certhidea olivacea Feather Phthiraptera Philopteridae Brueelia interposita Geospiza difficilis Palma and Peck (2013) louse Geospiza fortis Geospiza fuliginosa Geospiza magnirostris Camarhynchus psittacula Platyspiza crassirostris Feather Phthiraptera Philopteridae Philopterus insulicola Certhidea olivacea Palma and Peck (2013) louse extraordinary species richness (Windsor, 1998) and biomass Thraupidae. They evolved from a single group of ances- (Kuris et al., 2008), parasites contribute to important tors that colonised the Galapagos Islands 2–3 million ecosystems functions and services as they occupy key roles years ago from Central or South America (Farrington & in food webs (Hudson et al., 2006; Strona, 2015), they may Petren, 2009). One of these, the Cocos Island finch be indicators of ecosystem health (Marcogliese, 2005), and (Pinaroloxias inornata) occurs only on Cocos Island. are relevant in increasing genetic diversity of natural popu- Therefore, the Galapagos radiation would comprise 15 lations (Coltman et al., 1999; O’Brien, 2000). In addition, finch species that include seven ground finches (Geospiza parasite population genetics is a useful tool to infer host’s spp.), five tree finches (Camarhynchus spp.), the vegetarian population history (Whiteman & Parker, 2005). finch (Platyspiza crassirostris) and two warbler finches The relevance of parasites in natural ecosystems leaves (Certhidea spp.). We follow the avian taxonomic classifi- us with an important dilemma that needs to be addressed cation of the Cornell University (2016) Neotropical Birds and dealt with: should native parasites be saved when a website (http://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/) where the free-living species is managed for its conservation? (Perez vampire finch, Geospiza septentrionalis, is not recognised et al., 2013). The case of a host specific louse living on as a separate species. Most of Darwin’s finches occur on the Californian condor, which became extinct because of more than one island of the Galapagos archipelago but the conservation efforts to save its host, is a classic there are two species of major conservation concern. The example of that dilemma (Windsor, 1990; Stork & Lyal, mangrove finch (Camarhynchus heliobates) with <100 indi- 1993; Anonymous, 2006). Here, we are concerned viduals is restricted to Isabela Island (Lawson et al., about the fate of the Darwin’s finches and their native 2017), and the medium tree finch (Camarhynchus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philornis Downsi Interactions with Its Host in the Introduced Range and Its Parasitoids in Its Native Range a Thesis Submitted T
    PHILORNIS DOWNSI INTERACTIONS WITH ITS HOST IN THE INTRODUCED RANGE AND ITS PARASITOIDS IN ITS NATIVE RANGE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Ismael Esai Ramirez IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE Adviser: Dr. George E. Heimpel December 2018 i © Ismael Esai Ramirez ii Acknowledgments This thesis was completed with the guidance of faculty and staff and the knowledge I have acquired from professors in the Entomology Department and classes along the progress of my degree. My gratitude goes, especially, to my advisor Dr. George E. Heimpel, for taking me as his graduate student, for believing in me, and teaching me valuable skills I need to succeed in a career in academia I am appreciative for the help and feedback I received on my thesis. I am especially grateful for the help I received from my committee members, Drs. Marlene Zuk and Ralph Holzenthal, for their invaluable support and feedback. The generosity has been tremendous. Additionally, I want to thank Dr. Rebecca A. Boulton for her insights in my thesis and her friendship, and Dr. Carl Stenoien for aiding with my chapters. I want to give recognition to the Charles Darwin Research Station staff for their support, Dr. Charlotte Causton, Ma. Piedad Lincango, Andrea Cahuana, Paola Lahuatte, and Courtney Pike. I want to thank my fellow graduate students, undergraduate students, and my lab-mates, Jonathan Dregni, Hannah Gray, Mary Marek-Spartz, James Miksanek, and Charles Lehnen for their support and friendship. To my field assistants and hosts in mainland Ecuador, Isidora Rosales and her family, Mauricio Torres and Enzo Reyes that aided me during fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015)
    IUCN Red List version 2015.4: Table 7 Last Updated: 19 November 2015 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2014 (IUCN Red List version 2014.3) and 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015-4) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2014) List (2015) change version Category Category MAMMALS Aonyx capensis African Clawless Otter LC NT N 2015-2 Ailurus fulgens Red Panda VU EN N 2015-4
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Population Size and Genetic Conservation Criteria for Bull Trout
    North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:756±764, 2001 q Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2001 Effective Population Size and Genetic Conservation Criteria for Bull Trout B. E. RIEMAN* U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 316 East Myrtle, Boise, Idaho 83702, USA F. W. A LLENDORF Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA Abstract.ÐEffective population size (Ne) is an important concept in the management of threatened species like bull trout Salvelinus con¯uentus. General guidelines suggest that effective population sizes of 50 or 500 are essential to minimize inbreeding effects or maintain adaptive genetic variation, respectively. Although Ne strongly depends on census population size, it also depends on demographic and life history characteristics that complicate any estimates. This is an especially dif®cult problem for species like bull trout, which have overlapping generations; biologists may monitor annual population number but lack more detailed information on demographic population structure or life history. We used a generalized, age-structured simulation model to relate Ne to adult numbers under a range of life histories and other conditions characteristic of bull trout populations. Effective population size varied strongly with the effects of the demographic and environmental variation included in our simulations. Our most realistic estimates of Ne were between about 0.5 and 1.0 times the mean number of adults spawning annually. We conclude that cautious long-term management goals for bull trout populations should include an average of at least 1,000 adults spawning each year. Where local populations are too small, managers should seek to conserve a collection of interconnected populations that is at least large enough in total to meet this minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Temporal Analysis of Genetic Diversity in the Endangered Medium Tree Finch (Camarhynchus Pauper) and Closely Related Darwin’S Finches
    Cross-Temporal Analysis of Genetic Diversity in the Endangered Medium Tree Finch (Camarhynchus pauper) and Closely Related Darwin’s Finches By Colleen Metzger B.S., Juniata College, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati Department of Biological Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science Committee Chair: Kenneth Petren, Ph.D. November 2012 Abstract Natural history collections can provide a direct view of past genotypes, which allows greater insight into evolutionary processes that are relevant for conservation and management. However, few studies have used broad surveys of multilocus genotypes from the past to address the wide range of processes that can affect conservation planning of a species today. Therefore, we assessed the history and status of the critically endangered medium tree finch, Camarhynchus pauper, an endemic finch of the Galápagos Islands. Using ancient DNA techniques, we quantified cross-temporal genetic change for 16 microsatellite loci in this species and its relatives. We tested the hypothesis that C. pauper has undergone a recent reduction in population size and loss of genetic diversity, and evaluated the hypothesis that C. pauper is genetically distinct from its two closest relatives, C. parvulus and C. psittacula. We assessed whether decline in C. pauper has led to increased hybridization with other species and evaluated a long-standing hypothesis of its origin from C. psittacula on another island using genetic distances, assignment tests, and migration analyses. Genetic diversity declined significantly in C. pauper over time, and several other tree finch populations showed similar losses of genetic diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecuador & the Galapagos Islands
    Ecuador & the Galapagos Islands - including Sacha Lodge Extension Naturetrek Tour Report 29 January – 20 February 2018 Medium Ground-finch Blue-footed Booby Wire-tailed Manakin Galapagos Penguin Green Sea Turtle Report kindly compiled by Tour participants Sally Wearing, Rowena Tye, Debbie Hardie and Sue Swift Images courtesy of David Griffiths, Sue Swift, Debbie Hardie, Jenny Tynan, Rowena Tye, Nick Blake and Sally Wearing Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf’s Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Ecuador & the Galapagos Islands - including Sacha Lodge Extension Tour Leader in the Galapagos: Juan Tapia with 13 Naturetrek Clients This report has kindly been compiled by tour participants Sally Wearing, Rowena Tye, Debbie Hardie and Sue Swift. Day 1 Monday 29th January UK to Quito People arrived in Quito via Amsterdam with KLM or via Madrid with Iberia, while Tony came separately from the USA. Everyone was met at the airport and taken to the Hotel Vieja Cuba; those who were awake enough went out to eat before a good night’s rest. Day 2 Tuesday 30th January Quito. Weather: Hot and mostly sunny. The early risers saw the first few birds of the trip outside the hotel: Rufous- collared Sparrow, Great Thrush and Eared Doves. After breakfast, an excellent guide took us on a bus and walking tour of Quito’s old town. This started with the Basilica del Voto Nacional, where everyone marvelled at the “grotesques” of native Ecuadorian animals such as frigatebirds, iguanas and tortoises.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Knowledge Review: Shrill Carder Bee Bombus Sylvarum in England and Wales
    Species Knowledge Review: Shrill carder bee Bombus sylvarum in England and Wales Editors: Sam Page, Richard Comont, Sinead Lynch, and Vicky Wilkins. Bombus sylvarum, Nashenden Down nature reserve, Rochester (Kent Wildlife Trust) (Photo credit: Dave Watson) Executive summary This report aims to pull together current knowledge of the Shrill carder bee Bombus sylvarum in the UK. It is a working document, with a view to this information being reviewed and added when needed (current version updated Oct 2019). Special thanks to the group of experts who have reviewed and commented on earlier versions of this report. Much of the current knowledge on Bombus sylvarum builds on extensive work carried out by the Bumblebee Working Group and Hymettus in the 1990s and early 2000s. Since then, there have been a few key studies such as genetic research by Ellis et al (2006), Stuart Connop’s PhD thesis (2007), and a series of CCW surveys and reports carried out across the Welsh populations between 2000 and 2013. Distribution and abundance Records indicate that the Shrill carder bee Bombus sylvarum was historically widespread across southern England and Welsh lowland and coastal regions, with more localised records in central and northern England. The second half of the 20th Century saw a major range retraction for the species, with a mixed picture post-2000. Metapopulations of B. sylvarum are now limited to five key areas across the UK: In England these are the Thames Estuary and Somerset; in South Wales these are the Gwent Levels, Kenfig–Port Talbot, and south Pembrokeshire. The Thames Estuary and Gwent Levels populations appear to be the largest and most abundant, whereas the Somerset population exists at a very low population density, the Kenfig population is small and restricted.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Symbiont Extinction Risk Using Cophylogenetic Data 2 3 Jorge Doña1 and Kevin P
    1 Assessing symbiont extinction risk using cophylogenetic data 2 3 Jorge Doña1 and Kevin P. Johnson1 4 5 1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 6 1816 S. Oak St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA 7 8 *Corresponding authors: Jorge Doña & Kevin Johnson; e-mail: [email protected] & [email protected] 9 10 Abstract: Symbionts have a unique mode of life that has attracted the attention of ecologists and 11 evolutionary biologists for centuries. As a result of this attention, these disciplines have produced 12 a mature body of literature on host-symbiont interactions. In contrast, the discipline of symbiont 13 conservation is still in a foundational stage. Here, we aim to integrate methodologies on symbiont 14 coevolutionary biology with the perspective of conservation. We focus on host-symbiont 15 cophylogenies, because they have been widely used to study symbiont diversification history and 16 contain information on symbiont extinction. However, cophylogenetic information has never been 17 used nor adapted to the perspective of conservation. Here, we propose a new statistic, 18 “cophylogenetic extinction rate” (Ec), based on coevolutionary knowledge, that uses data from 19 event-based cophylogenetic analyses, and which could be informative to assess relative symbiont 20 extinction risks. Finally, we propose potential future research to further develop estimation of 21 symbiont extinction risk from cophylogenetic analyses and continue the integration of this existing 22 knowledge of coevolutionary biology and cophylogenetics into future symbiont conservation 23 studies and practices. 24 25 Keywords: coevolution, coextinction risk, conservation biology, cophylogenies, host-symbiont 26 interactions, parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin's Theory of Evolution Through Natural Selection
    THE EVOLUTION OF LIFE NOTEBOOK Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Through Natural Selection OBSERVING PHENOMENA Phenomenon: Darwin found many kinds of finches with different sized and shaped beaks on the different islands of the Galápagos. 1. What questions do you have about this phenomenon? 1 - Darwin’s Voyage on the Beagle 1. What did Darwin see in South America that surprised him? 2. What was Lyell’s argument about Earth’s land features and what did it cause Darwin to question about the mountains? © Teachers’ Curriculum Institute Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Through Natural Selection 1 NOTEBOOK 2 - Darwin Visits the Galápagos Islands 1. What did many the species of animals in the Galapagos island resemble? 2. What is a trait? Give one example of a trait. 2 Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Through Natural Selection © Teachers’ Curriculum Institute NOTEBOOK INVESTIGATION 1 1. Which tool is a model for which bird’s beak? Match them below. Tools A. toothpick B. tweezers C. nail clippers D. pliers Tool Finch Large ground finch Vegetarian finch Cactus finch Woodpecker finch 2. Keep track of how many of each bird there are after each round. Station 1 Finch Before Round 1 After Round 1 After Round 2 Large ground finch 1 Vegetarian finch 1 Cactus finch 1 Woodpecker finch 1 Station 2 Finch Before Round 1 After Round 1 After Round 2 Large ground finch 1 Vegetarian finch 1 Cactus finch 1 Woodpecker finch 1 © Teachers’ Curriculum Institute Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Through Natural Selection 3 NOTEBOOK Station 3 Finch Before Round 1 After Round 1 After Round 2 Large ground finch 1 Vegetarian finch 1 Cactus finch 1 Woodpecker finch 1 Station 4 Finch Before Round 1 After Round 1 After Round 2 Large ground finch 1 Vegetarian finch 1 Cactus finch 1 Woodpecker finch 1 3.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where Science Comes to Life
    RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where science comes to life Contents Knowing 2 Introducing the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science and an explanation of how and why the RSPB does science. A decade of science at the RSPB 9 A selection of ten case studies of great science from the RSPB over the last decade: 01 Species monitoring and the State of Nature 02 Farmland biodiversity and wildlife-friendly farming schemes 03 Conservation science in the uplands 04 Pinewood ecology and management 05 Predation and lowland breeding wading birds 06 Persecution of raptors 07 Seabird tracking 08 Saving the critically endangered sociable lapwing 09 Saving South Asia's vultures from extinction 10 RSPB science supports global site-based conservation Spotlight on our experts 51 Meet some of the team and find out what it is like to be a conservation scientist at the RSPB. Funding and partnerships 63 List of funders, partners and PhD students whom we have worked with over the last decade. Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com) Conservation rooted in know ledge Introduction from Dr David W. Gibbons Welcome to the RSPB Centre for Conservation The Centre does not have a single, physical Head of RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Science. This new initiative, launched in location. Our scientists will continue to work from February 2014, will showcase, promote and a range of RSPB’s addresses, be that at our UK build the RSPB’s scientific programme, helping HQ in Sandy, at RSPB Scotland’s HQ in Edinburgh, us to discover solutions to 21st century or at a range of other addresses in the UK and conservation problems.
    [Show full text]
  • FIELD GUIDES BIRDING TOURS: Galapagos: an Intimate Look At
    Field Guides Tour Report Galapagos: An Intimate Look at Darwin's Islands II 2014 Jul 5, 2014 to Jul 15, 2014 Megan Edwards Crewe with Peter Freire For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. For those interested in natural history, the Galapagos Islands are a wonderland. Every island is a revelation. The animals -- though wild and unfettered -- are so trusting as to seem tame. Our week's cruise brought us within arm's length of Galapagos Tortoises the size of coffee tables and whip-fast lava lizards. Albatrosses snoozed in the middle of paths. Mockingbirds investigated bare toes. Boobies stomped their way through our group. "Darwin's Finches" circled as if planning to land atop heads or arms or camera lenses. And everywhere, we could settle in for extended studies of plants or birds or insects or herps or fish, secure in the knowledge that they just wouldn't care that we were there. As you might expect in such a naturalist's paradise, there were many, many highlights. Waved Albatrosses called and bowed and clattered their beaks together, or brooded small chicks (which look surprisingly poodle- The Swallow-tailed Gull is surely one of the world's most handsome seabirds. (Photo by guide Megan like, thanks to their curly feathers). Blue-footed Edwards Crewe) Boobies whistled and grunted and solemnly displayed their extraordinary feet to each other. Well-camouflaged Short-eared Owls lurked among a whirling mass of Wedge-rumped Storm-Petrels, waiting for an opportunity -- and a one-eyed hunter gobbled its hapless prey nearly at our feet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Galapagos Islands DAY by DAY ITINERARY D+A 8 Days – 7 Nights
    The Galapagos Islands DAY BY DAY ITINERARY D+A 8 days – 7 nights D Our Galapagos itineraries offer unforgettable experiences, with our SOUTH weekly departures allowing you to experience 3, 4, 7, and up to 14 + nights tours including: full board, two daily guided excursions with optional activities such as snorkeling, kayaking, dinghy rides and our A NORTH - CENTRAL new feature daily diving tours for license-holding divers. 8 Days / 7 Nights Wednesday: San Cristobal Airport pm. Interpretation Center & Tijeretas (San Cristobal Island). Thursday: am. Cerro Brujo (San Cristobal Island) GENOVESA pm. Pitt Point (San Cristobal Island ) Darwin Bay Friday: El Barranco, am. Suarez Point (Española Island) Prince pm. Gardner Bay, Osborn or Gardner Islets Philip’s Steps (Española Island) Saturday: am. Cormorant Point, Devil’s Crown or Champion Islet (Floreana Island) pm.Post Office (Floreana Island) Sunday: am. Pit Craters (Santa Cruz) pm. Charles Darwin Research Station & Fausto Llerena Breeding Center (Santa Cruz Island) Monday: Buccaneer Cove am. Dragon Hill (Santa Cruz Island) pm. Bartolome Island Tuesday: am. Rabida Island pm. Buccaneer Cove & Espumilla Beach (Santiago Island) Wednesday: am. Back Turtle Cove (Santa Cruz Island) Baltra Airport Pit Craters Charles Darwin Research Station Kicker Rock Champion Islet Gardner Islets DAY 1 - WEDNESDAY am - San Cristobal Airport Departure from Quito or Guayaquil to San Cristobal (2 1/2 hours flight). Arriving in Galapagos, passengers are picked up at the airport by our naturalist guides and taken to the pier to board the M/Y Coral I or M/Y Coral II. pm – Interpretation Center & Tijeretas Hill (San Cristobal Island) Dry landing in Puerto Baquerizo Moreno, the capital of the Galapagos Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Seeds: Optimally Planning Our Ex Situ Conservation Collections to Ensure Species' Evolutionary Potential1
    Gene Conservation of Tree Species—Banking on the Future Saving Seeds: Optimally Planning Our Ex Situ Conservation Collections to Ensure Species' 1 Evolutionary Potential Sean M. Hoban2,3 In the face of ongoing environmental change, conservation and natural resource agencies are initiating or expanding ex situ seed collections from natural plant populations. Seed collections have many uses, including in provenance trials, breeding programs, seed orchards, gene banks for long-term conservation (live plants or seeds), restoration, reforestation, and scientific study of plant germination or other plant ecology studies. Well-known examples of ex situ collections include the Millennium Seed Bank Partnership, Australian Seed Bank Partnership, United Kingdom National Tree Seed Program, United States National Plant Germplasm System, and South African Regional Seed Bank. Some collections focus on rare species, species with relevance to agriculture or forestry, or regional flora. Other collections are in response to immediate threats, such as damaging insects and pathogens (e.g., emerald ash borer). In this talk I will discuss how to sample seeds to most optimally conserve the evolutionary potential of a species to ensure its long-term survival. A useful seed collection captures as much phenotypic and genetic diversity from natural populations as possible. Choices for a collector include how many populations, maternal plants, and seeds per plant to collect. A collector wishes to achieve efficiency—to not waste limited time, resources, personnel, and storage space, but also to achieve effectiveness—to be as complete as possible in case important genetic variants are lost from natural populations. In a series of papers starting in 1975, Brown and Marshall (1975) proposed some solutions to this general sampling problem.
    [Show full text]