Physical Environment Jeanne D'arc Basin / Central Ridge/Flemish

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Physical Environment Jeanne D'arc Basin / Central Ridge/Flemish Physical Environment Jeanne d’Arc Basin / Central Ridge/Flemish Pass Basins Seismic Program for Statoil Canada Prepared for: LGL 388 Kenmount Road St. John’s, NL A1B 4A5 Prepared by: Oceans Limited 85 LeMarchant Road St. John’s, NL A1C 2H1 March 2011 TableofContents 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Climatology......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 General Description of Weather Systems....................................................................... 3 2.2 Data Sources................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Wind................................................................................................................................ 6 2.4 Waves............................................................................................................................ 20 2.5 Weather Variables......................................................................................................... 41 2.5.1 Air and Sea Surface Temperature............................................................................. 41 2.5.2 Precipitation .............................................................................................................. 44 2.5.3 Visibility ................................................................................................................... 47 2.6 Tropical Systems........................................................................................................... 49 3.0 Extreme Analysis.............................................................................................................. 54 3.1 Extreme Value Estimates for Winds from the Gumbel Distribution............................ 54 3.2 Extreme Value Estimates for Waves from a Gumbel Distribution............................... 58 3.3 Joint Probability of Extreme wave Heights and Spectral Peak Period ......................... 61 4.0 Physical Oceanography..................................................................................................... 66 4.1 Major Currents in the Study Area................................................................................. 66 4.2 Currents in the Project Area.......................................................................................... 68 4.2.1 Sub-area 1: Orphan Basin ......................................................................................... 70 4.2.2 Sub-area 2: Sackville Spur &Flemish Pass............................................................... 71 4.2.3 Northeast Grand Banks............................................................................................. 79 4.3 Water Mass Structure.................................................................................................... 84 4.4 Water Properties in the Project Area ............................................................................ 99 4.4.1 Sub-area 1 Orphan Basin ........................................................................................ 100 4.4.2 Sub-area 2- Sackville Spur and Flemish Pass......................................................... 106 .4.4.3 Sub-area 3- Northeast Grand Bank........................................................................... 111 4.4.3 Sub-area 3- Northeast Grand Bank............................................................................ 112 5.0 Sea Ice and Icebergs........................................................................................................ 122 5.1 Sea Ice......................................................................................................................... 122 5.2 Icebergs....................................................................................................................... 126 References................................................................................................................................... 132 Appendix 1 Wind Roses and Wind Speed Frequency Distributions for MSC50 GridPoint 10255 ..................................................................................................................................................... 134 Appendix 2 Wind Roses and Wind Speed Frequency Distributions for MSC50 GridPoint 11820 ..................................................................................................................................................... 147 Appendix 3 Wave Roses and Wave Height Frequency Distributions for MSC50 GridPoint 10255........................................................................................................................................... 160 Appendix 4 Wave Roses and Wave Height Frequency Distributions for MSC50 GridPoint 11820........................................................................................................................................... 173 Appendix 5 Wind Roses and Wind Speed Frequency Distributions for MSC50 GridPoint 13428 ..................................................................................................................................................... 186 Appendix 6 Wind Roses and Wind Speed Frequency Distributions for MSC50 GridPoint 14697 ..................................................................................................................................................... 199 Appendix 7 Wave Roses and Wave Height Frequency Distributions for MSC50 GridPoint 13428........................................................................................................................................... 212 Appendix 8 Wave Roses and Wave Height Frequency Distributions for MSC50 GridPoint 14697 ..................................................................................................................................................... 225 Table of Figures Figure 2.1 Locations of the Climate Data Sources .......................................................................................5 Figure 2.2 Annual Wind Rose for MSC50 Grid Point 10255 located near 46.3°N; 48.4°W. 1954 – 2005..8 Figure 2.3 Annual Wind Rose for MSC50 Grid Point 11280 located 47.1°N; 47.3°W. 1954 – 2005 .........9 Figure 2.4 Annual Percentage Frequency of Wind Speeds for MSC50 Grid Point 10255 located near 46.3°N; 48.4°W. 1954 – 2005.......................................................................................................................9 Figure 2.5 Annual Percentage Frequency of Wind Speeds for MSC50 Grid Point 11280 located near 47.1°N; 47.3°W. 1954 – 2005.....................................................................................................................10 Figure 2.6 Percentage Exceedance of 10 metre wind speed at Grid Point 10255 located near 46.3°N; 48.4°W . 1954 to 2005 ................................................................................................................................11 Figure 2.7 Percentage Exceedance of 10 metre wind speed at Grid Point 11820 located near 47.1°N; 47.3°W . 1954 to 2005 ................................................................................................................................12 Figure 2.8 Annual Wind Rose for MSC50 Grid Point 13428 located near 48.0°N; 46.3°W. 1954 – 200515 Figure 2.9 Annual Wind Rose for MSC50 Grid Point 14697 located near 48.8°N; 46.3°W. 1954 – 200515 Figure 2.10 Annual Percentage Frequency of Wind Speeds for MSC50 Grid Point 13428 located near 48.0°N; 46.3°W. 1954 – 2005.....................................................................................................................16 Figure 2.11 Annual Percentage Frequency of Wind Speeds for MSC50 Grid Point 14697 located near 48.8°N; 46.3°W. 1954 – 2005.....................................................................................................................16 Figure 2.12 Percentage Exceedance of 10 metre wind speed at Grid Point 13428 located near 48.0°N; 46.3°W . 1954 to 2005 ................................................................................................................................18 Figure 2.13 Percentage Exceedance of 10 metre wind speed at Grid Point 14697 located near 48.8°N; 46.3°W. 1954 to 2005.................................................................................................................................19 Figure 2.14 Annual Wave Rose for MSC50 Grid Point 10255 located near 46.3°N; 48.4°W, 1954 to 2005 ....................................................................................................................................................................21 Figure 2.15 Annual Wave Rose for MSC50 Grid Point 11820 located near 47.3°N; 47.3°W, 1954 to 2005 ....................................................................................................................................................................22 Figure 2.16 Annual Percentage Frequency of Wave Height for MSC50 Grid Point 10255 located near 46.3°N; 48.4°W. 1954 to 2005....................................................................................................................22 Figure 2.17 Annual Percentage Frequency of Wave Height for MSC50 Grid Point 11820 located near 47.3°N; 47.3°W. 1954 to 2005....................................................................................................................23 Figure
Recommended publications
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms
    FLORIDA HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 1871-1995: An Historical Survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams '+wcCopy~~ I~BN 0-912747-08-0 Florida SeaGrant College is supported by award of the Office of Sea Grant, NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,grant number NA 36RG-0070, under provisions of the NationalSea Grant College and Programs Act of 1966. This information is published by the Sea Grant Extension Program which functionsas a coinponentof the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Extensionwork in Agriculture, Home Economics, and Marine Sciences,State of Florida, U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, U.S. Departmentof Commerce, and Boards of County Commissioners, cooperating.Printed and distributed in furtherance af the Actsof Congressof May 8 andJune 14, 1914.The Florida Sea Grant Collegeis an Equal Opportunity-AffirmativeAction employer authorizedto provide research, educational information and other servicesonly to individuals and institutions that function without regardto race,color, sex, age,handicap or nationalorigin. Coverphoto: Hank Brandli & Rob Downey LOANCOPY ONLY Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 1871-1995: An Historical survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams Division of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 32901 Technical Paper - 71 June 1994 $5.00 Copies may be obtained from: Florida Sea Grant College Program University of Florida Building 803 P.O. Box 110409 Gainesville, FL 32611-0409 904-392-2801 II Our friend andcolleague, Fred Doehringpictured below, died on January 5, 1993, before this manuscript was completed. Until his death, Fred had spent the last 18 months painstakingly researchingdata for this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Project STORMFURY: a Scientific Chronicle 1962-1983
    Project STORMFURY: H. E. Willoughby, D. P. Jorgensen1, R. A. Black, and S. L. Rosenthal A Scientific Chronicle Hurricane Research Division, AOML/NOAA 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway 1962-1983 Miami, FL 33149 Abstract of Georgia and North Florida. After seeding, observers aboard the experimental aircraft noted changes in the visual Between 1962 and 1983, research in hurricane modification centered appearance of the clouds, but they could not demonstrate on an ambitious experimental program, Project STORMFURY. any other effects on structure or intensity. The one indisput- The proposed modification technique involved artificial stimulation of convection outside the eye wall through seeding with silver iodide. able change—although apparently not the result of seeding The artificially invigorated convection, it was argued, would compete (Mook et al., 1957)—was a reversal of track toward the west, with the convection in the original eye wall, lead to reformation of which ultimately led to landfall on the coasts of Georgia and the eye wall at larger radius, and thus produce a decrease in the max- South Carolina. Claims by Langmuir (Byers, 1974) that the imum wind. track had been influenced through human intervention were Since a hurricane's destructive potential increases rapidly as its maximum wind becomes stronger, a reduction as small as 10% an embarrassment at the time and left a legacy that had an would have been worthwhile. Modification was attempted in four adverse effect upon political and legal arrangements for later hurricanes on eight different days. On four of these days, the winds hurricane modification efforts. decreased by between 10 and 30%. The lack of response on the other The years 1954 and 1955 each brought three major hurri- days was interpreted to be the result of faulty execution of the exper- iment or poorly selected subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/28/21 10:59 AM UTC 1 76 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW Vol
    March 1965 Gordon E. Dunn and Staff 175 THEHURRICANE SEASON OF 1964 GORDON E. DUNN AND STAFF* U.S. Weather Bureau Office, Miami, Fla. 1. GENERALSUMMARY spondvery well withthe composite chart for atverage Twelvetropical cyclones,six of hurricaneintensity, departures from nornml for seasons of maxinlum tropical developedover tropical Atlantic waters during 1964. cycloneincidence inthe southeastern United States as This is the largest number since 1955 and compares with developed by Ballenzweig [a]. an average of 10during the past three decades. The September was aneven more active month and cor- centers of four hurricanes penetrated the mainland of the respondence between Ballenzweig'scomposite chrt and United States, the largest number to do so since the five theobserved values was better, particularly south of in 1933. There have been only four other years with four latitude 40' W. According toGreen [3] thesubtropical or more since 1900; four in 1906, 1909, and 1926, and six High was abnornlallystrong and displacedslightly in 1916.While none of thefour renching the mainland northwardfrom normal (favorable for tropical cyclone in 1964 wits :L major hurricane at the time of landfall, formation) while the 700-mb. jet was slightlysouth of three-Cleo, Dora, and EIi1da"were severe. normal (unfavorable). The long-wave position fluctuated Florida was struck by three hurricanes in addition to back and forth from the Rockies and Great Plains east- dyinghurricane Hilda and one tropical cyclone of less ward and the tropical cyclones experienced considerable than hurricane intensity; thus ended an unequalled rela- difficulty in penetrating the westerlies. During the major tively hurricane-free period of 13 years from 1951 through hurricanemonths in 1964 the long-wavetrough failed 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • SELECTION of DATA for TROPICAL CYCLONE RAINFALL STUDIES Donald Brandes Rainfall Which Occurs During the Passage of a Hurricane O
    SELECTION OF DATA FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE RAINFALL STUDIES Donald Brandes tt Rainfall which occurs during the passage of a hurricane or tropical storm center several hundred miles away mayor may not be directly related to the passing tropical cyclone. Satellite remote sensing imagery may be used to de­ termine the areal distribution of clouds associated with the tropical cyclone • and reveal the areas where rainfall was directly attributable to such a storm. Satellite imagery, however, exists only from 1960 to the present, and is diffi­ cult to obtain for 1960 through 1968. No such record of the continuity of cloud coverage is available for earlier times. Without knowing if an area was covered by clouds which emanated from a tropical system, it is not possible to determine with certainty if rain which fell at a given place was the result of the passing tropical cyclone or of other local or extra-tropical causes. Previous Studies Previous studies of tropical cyclone rainfall have failed to address the problem of whether a given observation of rain actually resulted from a specific storm. Cry (1967) discussed the problem of wind reducing the effectiveness of rain collection devices but neglects the question of whether the given sample should be considered at all. Goodyear (1968) avoided raw climatological data by using the United States Army Corps of Engineers information whenever possible. For earlier times he draws his information directly from summaries of weather station records, but gives no explanation of how it is known that the rainfall is the result of tropical cyclones in either situation.
    [Show full text]
  • AUTUMN MIGRATION of the BLACKPOLL WARBLER: EVIDENCE for LONG FLIGHT PROVIDED by REGIONAL SURVEY* by IA• C
    AUTUMN MIGRATION OF THE BLACKPOLL WARBLER: EVIDENCE FOR LONG FLIGHT PROVIDED BY REGIONAL SURVEY* By IA• C. T. The long migrations of the Blackpoll Warbler (Dendroica striata) have been discussedextensively. The speciesbreeds farther to the north and west and winters farther to the south and east than most other North American warblers (Fig. 3); on autumn migration it is found in large numbers along the Atlantic seaboard of North America. Cooke (1904, 1915) suggestedthat all birds of the species migrate SSW down the Atlantic Coast to the southeastern United States, before turning southeasttowards their winter range. This hypothesishas been restated and mapped by Murray (1965, 1966a). On the other hand, Nisbet et al. (1963) suggestedthat many birds which stop over in southern New England migrate SSE from there acrossthe Atlantic Ocean towards their wintering range. If con- firmed, their long flight is of considerableimportance for physio- logical, aerodynamic and navSgationaltheories (Nisbet et al. 1963, Nisbet 1967, Griffin 1969). This paper attempts to resolve the question by surveying the abundance of Blackpoll Warblers on autumn migration throughout North America south of the breed- ing range. Quantitative comparisons between regions in this paper are based mainly on two sourcesof numerical data: (a) collections of birds killed in accidents during nocturnal migration, and (b) systematic sampling by mist-nets at banding stations. For the critical area of the southeasternUnited States, I have also made a detailed survey of published and unpublisheddata on local occur- renee of grounded migrants. The relative merits of these sources of data will be discussedat the end of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atlantic Hurricane Season of 1968
    March 1969 225 UDC 551.515.2(261.1)"1968" THE ATLANTICHURRICANE SEASON OF 1968 ARNOLD L. SUGG and PAUL J. HEBERT' National Hurricane Center, Weather Bureau, ESSA, Miami, Fla. ABSTRACT The 1968 hurricane season in the North Atlantic area, considered in its entirety, and synoptic and statistical aspects of individual storms are discussed. 1. GENERAL SUMMARY TABLE1.-Hurricane days, 1954-1968 The two hurricanes and onetropical storm inJune Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Dec. Total Nov. Oct. equaled a record established in 1886.2 While there were __-_________ two other years, 1959 and 1936, with a total of three June 1954 ___.__.__.___._..... _____ ..-.-..... 1 ..". 5 8 16 ___._1 31 tropical cyclones, each is not unique as there were two I955 ___.___...4 ..". .____ _____ ..... ._.._..". 22 28 2 .." ~ _____ 56 1956___._..__. ..-....". ___._ ..... ..". ..-.- 1 9 2 ___..3 ____ ._ 15 storms and one hurricane in those years. Two hurricanes 1957__.____.._ _._._..... ..". __.__..". 3 ..... _.___19 _._._ .._.______ 22 occurring inJune are noteworthy when one considers 1958__.___..._ _.___..... ..". _____ .".. _____ .__._14 16 5 ..____.___ 35 1959 __._....._..... __.._ .-..._.___ ..". 1 2 ..___10 11 .._______. 24 there have only been 20 since 1886. This is approximately 1960___......_ ..-.._._._ .".. .____..___4 2 ____.13 ~ ____ .____ ____. 10 one every 4 yr, rather than two for any one June. In spite 1961 ___......_..... ..-.- ..". ___.._____ ....
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Sandy 2012
    EGU Journal Logos (RGB) Open Access Open Access Open Access Advances in Annales Nonlinear Processes Geosciences Geophysicae in Geophysics Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Open Access Open Access Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,Natural 1, 625–679, Hazards 2013 Natural Hazards www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/1/625/2013/ and Earth System doi:10.5194/nhessd-1-625-2013and Earth System NHESSD Sciences Sciences © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 1, 625–679, 2013 Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Natural Hazards and Earth Chemistry Chemistry Hurricane Sandy System Sciences (NHESS). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in NHESS if available. and Physics and Physics 2012 Discussions Open Access Open Access M. Kunz et al. Investigation ofAtmospheric superstorm SandyAtmospheric 2012 in Measurement Measurement a multi-disciplinaryTechniques approach Techniques Title Page Discussions Open Access 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3 1,3 Open Access 1,3 M. Kunz , B. Muhr¨ , T. Kunz-Plapp , J.E. Daniell , B. Khazai , F. Wenzel , Abstract Introduction Biogeosciences M. Vannieuwenhuyse1,4,Biogeosciences T. Comes1,4, F. Elmer1,5, K. Schroter¨ 1,6, J. Fohringer1,7, Discussions Conclusions References T. Munzberg¨ 1,8, C. Lucas1,9, and J. Zschau1,10 Open Access 1 Open Access Tables Figures Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (CEDIM),Climate Potsdam and Karlsruhe, Germany Climate of the Past
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hazardous Weather Day-By-Day
    FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER DAY-BY-DAY Bartlett C. Hagemeyer JoAnn S. Carney National Weather Service Office Melbourne. Florida November 1995 National Weather Service Southern Region Headquarters Fort Worth, Texas FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER BY DAY (to 1994) Bartlett C. Hagemeyer JoAnn S. Carney National Weather Service Office Melbourne, Florida 32935 1. Introduction An extensive search of weather records and publications was undertaken to document the occurrence of hazardous weather elements in Florida. The hazardous weather events were then organized with the goal of having at least one event for every day of the year - in other words - a Florida hazardous weather calendar. The authors felt this was a method for a variety of users to better understand, and put into perspective, all the hazardous weather elements Florida is subject to. Initially, brief descriptions of every event that caused a weather-related fatality were included, and any other hazardous weather events that caused significant injuries or property damage, or that was of an unusual nature. Most days of the year were covered in this fashion. To have an event for each day, events that did not cause injury or serious property damage were included on some days. Many days had several major events and several days had only one minor event. In the interest of brevity not all non-fatal events could be included on days with multiple occurrences. There are literally hundreds of minor events that are not included in this document. The authors attempted to include the most significant events. This document concerns short-term hazardous weather events ranging in time from several minutes to several days.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's History, but It Fell Into the Category of Only Being Slightly Feet
    22 wasreported in Homesteadon the21st of September.Lowest baro- metricpressure was 28,44 inches, and top winds were 122 miles per hour. Thehurricane killed 3 peopleand caused 105 million dollars damage. The second1948 storm ran from the 3rd to the 15thof October and startedjust off the Nicaraguan/Hondurascoast in the northwest CaribbeanSea. Thishurricane also moved across western Cuba into theFlorida Straits and even crossed the September hurricane's path nearthe coordinates 24.0N and 82.0W. This storm passed through theKeys and extreme south Florida into Grand Bahama Island. At about31N latitude it dida giganticloop in themiddle of the Atlantic andfinally became a non-tropical cyclone. A tornadowas reported in FortLauderdale onthe 5th of October.Lowest barometric pres- surewas 28.92 inches, and top winds were around 90 miles per hour. In August1949, another major hurricane, taking a coursesimilar to theGreat Hurricane of September1928 entered the coast near PalmBeach. It wasthe worst hurricane felt in the LakeOkeechobee areasince 1928. Hurricane force winds were reported atSt. Augus- tine,Cape Canaveral, andMelbourne, and winds of 120miles per houror greater were felt from Stuart to Pompano. The highest re- cordedwind speed gust, 153 miles per hour, was at Jupiter, only 2 milesper hour less than the wind speed record set on September 27, 1947.The amount of damagein dollars, 45 million equivalent to $270million in 1990!,was almost twice that of the1928 hurricane. Thestorm was not classified asbeing among the Great Hurricanes in Florida'shistory, but it fellinto the category ofonly being slightly belowthem U.S. Weather Bureau, August 1949!. Tides were 24 feetand 23 feet at Belle Glade and Okeechobee, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Ttu Fujita 000282.Pdf (6.454Mb)
    SATELLITE & MESOMETEOROLOGY 1 RESEARCH PROJECT I \\ I \ \ \ Department of the Geophysical Sciences I \ \ The University of Chicago \ \ I \ \ I \ \ I \ \ \ I \ \ I I AIRCRAFT, SPACECRAFT, SATELLITE, AND RADAR I OBSERVATIONS OF HURRICANE GLADYS, 1968 I I by I R. Cecil Gentry I National Hurricane Research Laboratory I Tets uya T. Fujita I University of Chicago I and Robert C. Sheets National Hurricane Research Laboratory __:._L--==-==~ l SMRP Research Paper Nwnber 83 May 1970 MESOMETEOROLOGY PROJECT --- RESEARCH PAPERS 1. • Report on the Chicago Tornado of March 4, 1961 - Rodger A. Brown and Tetsuya Fujita 2. • Index to the NSSP Surface Network - Tetsuya Fujita 3. • Outline of a Technique for Precise Rectification of Satellite Cloud Photographs - Tetsuya Fujita 4. • Horizontal Structure of Mountain Winds - Henry A. Brown 5. • An Investigation of Developmental Processes of the Wake Depression Through Excess Pressure Analysis of Nocturnal Showers - Joseph L. Goldman 6. • Precipitation in the 1960 Flagstaff Mesometeorological Network - Kenneth A. Styber 7. •• On a Method of Single- and Dual-hnage Photogrammetry of Panoramic Aerial Photographs - Tetsuya Fujita 8. A Review of Researches on Analytical Mesometeorology - Tetsuya Fujita 9. • Meteorological Interpretations of Convective Nephsystems Appearing in TIROS Cloud Photographs - Tetsuya Fujita, Tos hlmitsu Ushijima, William A. Hass, and George T. Dellert, Jr. 10. Study of the Development of Prefrontal Squall-Systems Using NSSP Network Data - Joseph L. Goldman 11. Analysis of Selected Aircraft Data from NSSP Operation, 1962 - Tetsuya Fujita 12. Study of a Long Condensation Trail Photographed by TIROS I - Toshimitsu Ushijima 13. A Technique for Precise Analysis of Satellite Data; Volume I - Photogrammetry (Published as MSL Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) (NASA-:1-85090) THE RULE. OF Tile. E(jUI VALEMT N83-J4516 bLA(:KBOuY TEMPERATURE IN THE STUDY Of ATLANTIC UCLAb ':RUPICAL CYCLOWLS (RASA) b6 E) UC AU4/MF A01 CSCL 04B 0 lieieS 63/47 4201-1 RMA Technical Memorandum 85090 THE ROLE OF SATELLITE-MEASURED EQUIVALENT BLACKBODY TEMPERATURE IN THE STUDY OF ATLANTIC OCEAN TROP;cAL CYCLONES Joseph Steranka Edward B. Rodgers R. Cecil Gentry AUGUST 1983 a National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 TM 85090 THE ROLE OF SATELLITE-MEASURED EQUIVALENT BLACKBODY TEMPERATURE IN THE STUDY OF ATLANTIC OCEAN TROPICAL CYCLONES a Joseph Steranka General Software Corporation, Landover, MD 20785 Edward B. Rodgers Goddard Laboratory for Atmospheric Sciences NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD 20771 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced trom the· microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, 'some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copY submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough. substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. ln the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also. if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed. a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by seetioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6D x 9- black and white photographie prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI d!rectly to arder. Bell & Howell Information and Leaming 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor. MI 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. • A STUDY OF TROPICAL TO EXTRATROPICAL CYCLONE TRANSITION IN THE ~t WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN, 1963-1996 by Christopher T. Fogarty Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences McGill University ~Iontreal, Quebec August 1999 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master ofScience.
    [Show full text]