DOCSLIB.ORG

Manifesto Project Dataset List of Political Parties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manifesto Project Dataset List of Political Parties Manifesto Project Dataset List of Political Parties [email protected] Website: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/ Version 2018a from July 16, 2018 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018a 1 Coverage of the Dataset including Party Splits and Merges The following list documents the parties that were coded at a specific election. The list includes the name of the party or alliance in the original language and in English, the party/alliance abbreviation as well as the corresponding party identification number. In the case of an alliance, it also documents the member parties it comprises. Within the list of alliance members, parties are represented only by their id and abbreviation if they are also part of the general party list. If the composition of an alliance has changed between elections this change is reported as well. Furthermore, the list records renames of parties and alliances. It shows whether a party has split from another party or a number of parties has merged and indicates the name (and if existing the id) of this split or merger parties. In the past there have been a few cases where an alliance manifesto was coded instead of a party manifesto but without assigning the alliance a new party id. Instead, the alliance manifesto appeared under the party id of the main party within that alliance. In such cases the list displays the information for which election an alliance manifesto was coded as well as the name and members of this alliance. 2 Albania ID Covering Abbrev Parties No. Elections 75220 1991-2001 PPS Partia e Punës e Shqipërisë (Albanian Party of Labour) 5 renamed in 1992: PSS Partia Socialiste e Shqipërisë (Albanian Socialist Party) 75320 1991-2001 PSD Partia Socialdemokrate ë Shqipërisë (Social Democratic 5 Party of Albania) 75421 1992-2001 AD Partia Aleanca Demokratike (Democratic Alliance Party) 4 75621 1991 PP Partia Popullore (People’s Party) 1 predecessor: APLP Albanian People’s League Party 75622 1992 PUK Partia e Unitetit Kombëtar (Party of National Unity) 1 75623 1991, PLL Partia Lëvizja e Legalitetit (Legality Movement Party) 3 1996-1997 75624 1991-1997 PD Partia Demokratike e Shqipërisë (Democratic Party of 4 Albania) 75721 1996-1997 BK Partia Balli Kombëtar (National Front Party) 2 1 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018a in 1997 coalition Name: E Djatha e Bashkuar e Shqipërisë (United manifesto coded: Albanian Right); members: no information 75722 1991-1997 PRSH Partia Republikane Shqiptare (Albanian Republican 4 Party) 75810 1991, PASH Partia Agrare e Shqipërisë (Agrarian Party of Albania) 4 1996-2001 75951 1991-2001 OMONIA Bashkimia Demokratik i Minoritet Grek (Democratic 5 Union of the Greek Minority) renamed in 1992: PBDNJ Partia Bashkimi për të Drejtat e Njeriut (Union for Human Rights Party) 2 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018a 3 Armenia ID Covering Abbrev Parties No. Elections 76041 2012 HAK Alliance: Hay Azgayin Kongres (Armenian National 1 Congress); members: HHSh Hayots Hamazgain Sharzhum (Pan-Armenian National Movement, HZhK Hayastani Zhoghovrdakan Kusaktsutyun (People’s Party of Armenia), Hanrapetutyun (Republic), Zhoghovrdakan Hayreniq (Democratic Fatherland), Zhoghovrdakan Ughi (Democratic Way), Qristonya-demokratakan veratsnund (Christian-Democratic Revival), Azatutyan (Liberty), Hayots hayreniq kusaktsutyun (Armenian Fatherland Party) 76222 1995-1999 HKK Hayastani Komunistakan Kusaktsutyun (Communist 2 Party of Armenia) 76321 1999-2012 HHD Hay Heghapokhakan Dashnaktsutyun (Armenian 4 Revolutionary Federation) 76322 2003 MAK Miavorvac Ashkhatankayin Kusaktsutyun (United Labour 1 Party) 76420 1999-2012 OEK Orinats’ Yerkir (Rule of Law) 4 76421 2003 A Alliance: Ardarutyun (Justice); members: HZhK 1 Hayastani Zhoghovrdakan Kusaktsutyun (People’s Party of Armenia), AZhM (76712), HDK Hayastani Demokratakan Kusaktsutyun (Democratic Party of Armenia), Hanrapetutyun (Republic), Hayastani Demokratakan Kusaktsutyun (Natioanl Democratic Party), Sotsial-demokratakan Hnchakian kusaktsutsutyun (Social Democratic Hnchakian Party), Azgayin-demokratakan dashink (National Democratic Alliance), Sahmanadrakan iravunqi miutyun (Union for Constitutional Rights) 3 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018a 76430 2007-2012 Zharangutyun (Heritage) 2 76521 1995 AIM Azgayin Inknoroshum Miavorum (National 1 Self-Determination Union) 76610 2003-2012 HHK Hayastani Hanrapetakan Kusaktsutyun (Republican 3 Party of Armenia) 76620 2007-2012 BHK Bargavadj Hayastan Kusaktsutyun (Prosperous Armenia) 2 76711 1995 HA Alliance: Hanrapetutyun (Republic); members: HHSh 1 Hayots Hamazgain Sharzhum (Armenian Pan-National Movement, Sotsial-demokrat Hnchakian kusaktsutsyun (Social Democratic Hnchakian Party), Hay qristonya-demokratakan miutyun (Armenian Christian Democratic Union), Hayastani demokrat-liberal kusaktsutsyun (Democratic Liberal Party of Armenia), Hanrapetakan kusaktsutsyun (Republican Party) 76712 1995-1999 AZhM Azgayin Zhoghovrdakan Miutyun (National Democratic 2 Union) 76901 1995 Shamiram (Semiramis (Women’s Movement)) 1 76902 1999 IM Alliance: Iravunk ev Miabanutyun (Right and Unity); 1 members: AM (76904), Sahmanadrakan iravunqi miutyun (Union for Constitutional Rights), Artsakh Hayastan (Artsakj Haiastan), Gardmak 76903 1999 M Alliance: Miasnutyun (Unity); members: HZhK Hayastani 1 Zhoghovrdakan Kusaktsutyun (People’s Party of Armenia), HHK (76610) 76904 2003 AM Azgayin Miabanutyun (National Unity Party) 1 4 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018a 4 Australia ID Covering Abbrev Parties No. Elections 63110 2004-2013 Australian Greens 4 63320 1946-2013 ALP Australian Labor Party 27 63321 1990, AD Australian Democrats 4 1996-2001 63330 1955-1977 ALP-AC Australian Labor Party (Anti-Communist) 10 renamed in 1957: DLP Democratic Labor Party 63410 2013 PUP Palmer United Party 1 63620 1946-2013 LPA Liberal Party of Australia 27 63621 2010-2013 LNP Liberal National Party of Queensland 2 63622 2013 CLP Country Liberal Party 1 63710 2013 Katter’s Australian Party 1 63810 1946-2013 CP Country Party 27 renamed in 1975: NCP National Country Party renamed in 1982: NPA National Party of Australia 5 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018a 5 Austria ID Covering Abbrev Parties No. Elections 42110 1986-2013 GA Die Grüne Alternative (Green Alternative) 9 renamed in 1993: GRÜNE Die Grünen (The Greens) 42220 2002, 2008 KPÖ Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (Austrian Communist 2 Party) 42320 1949-2013 SPÖ Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (Austrian Social 20 Democratic Party) 42420 1949-2013 VdU Verband der Unabhängigen (League of Independents) 20 renamed in 1956: FPÖ Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (Austrian Freedom Party) renamed in 1995: Die Freiheitlichen (Freedom Movement) renamed in 1999: FPÖ Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (Austrian Freedom Party) 42421 1994-1995 LIF Liberales Forum (Liberal Forum) 2 42430 2013 NEOS Das Neue Österreich (The New Austria) 1 renamed in 2017: NEOS Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (The New Austria and Liberal Forum) 42520 1949-2013 ÖVP Österreichische Volkspartei (Austrian People’s Party) 20 42710 2006-2008 BZÖ Bündnis Zukunft Österreich (Alliance for the Future of 2 Austria) 42951 2013 TS Team Stronach für Österreich (Team Stronach for Austria) 1 6 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018a 6 Azerbaijan ID Covering Abbrev Parties No. Elections 77220 1995-2000 YAP Yeni Az@rbaycan Partiyası (New Azerbaijan Party) 2 77221 2000 AVKP Az@rbaycan Vahid Kommunist Partiyası (Azerbaijan 1 United Communist Party) predecessor: AKP Azrbaycan Kommunist Partiyası (Azerbaijan Communist Party) 77420 1995-2000 AXC Az@rbaycan Xalq Cebhesi (Azerbaijan Popular Front) 2 77430 1995 ADPS Az@rbaycan Demokratik Sahibkarlar Partiyası (Azerbaijan 1 Democratic Entrepeneurs Party) 77710 1995-2000 AMİP Az@rbaycan Milli İstiqlal Partiyası (Azerbaijan National 2 Independence Party) 77951 2000 VHP Vatandas Hamrayliyi Partiyası (Civil Solidarity Party) 1 7 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018a 7 Belarus ID Covering Abbrev Parties No. Elections 78211 1995 PKB Partiya Komunistau Belaruskaya (Party of Communists of 1 Belarus) 78212 1995 APB Agrarnaya Partiya Belarusi (Agrarian Party of Belarus) 1 78213 1995 BKhP Belaruskaya Syalanskaya Partiya (Belarusan Peasants’ 1 Party) 78214 1995 BPR Belaruski Patryatychny Rukh (Belarusan Patriotic 1 Movement) 78410 1995 PNZ Partiya Narodnaya Zgody (Party of People’s Consent) 1 78430 1995 ADPB Abyadnanya Demakratychnaya Partiya Belarusi (United 1 Democratic Party of Belarus) 78710 1995 BSDP Belaruskaja Sacyjal-Demakratychnaya Partiya ‘Hramada’ 1 (Belarusian Social-Democratic Party ‘Hramada’) 78901 1995 BPZ-N Belaruskaya Partiya Zhanchyn ‘Nadzeya’ (Party of 1 Women ‘Nadzeja’) 8 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018a 8 Belgium ID Covering Abbrev Parties No. Elections 21111 1981-2010 ECOLO Écologistes Confédérés pour l’Organisation de Luttes 9 Originales (Ecologists) 21112 1981-2010 AGALEV Anders Gaan Leven (Live Differently) 9 renamed in 2007: groen! Groen! (Green!) joined in 2009 by: SPIRIT (21330) 21221 2003-2007 sp.a-SPIRIT Socialistische Partij Anders - Spirit (Socialist Party 2 Different - Spirit) 21320 1946-1977 BSP/PSB Belgische Socialistische Partij/Parti Socialiste Belge 11 (Belgian Socialist Party) successor: 21321 21321 1978-1999, SP Socialistische Partij (Flemish Socialist Party) 9 2007-2010 predecessor:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abbreviations
    AbbreviAtions ABI Associazione Bancaria Italiana (Italian Banking Association) ALD Autonomie Liberté Démocratie (Autonomy Liberty Democracy) ALDE Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe AN Alleanza Nazionale (National Alliance) ANCI Associazione Nazionale Comuni Italiani (National Association of Italian Municipalities) ANM Associazione Nazionale Magistrati (National Magistrates Association) BdI Banca d’Italia (Bank of Italy) BMPS Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena CD Centro Democratico—Diritti e Libertà (Democratic Center—Rights and Freedom) CGIL Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (Italian General Confederation of Labor) CIR Compagnie Industriali Riunite (an Italian holding company) CISE Centro Italiano Studi Elettorali (Italian Center for Electoral Studies) CISL Confederazione Italiana Sindicati dei Lavoratori (Italian Confederation of Workers’ Trade Unions) CISR Comitato Interministeriale per la Sicurezza della Repubblica (Committee for the Security of the Republic) CLN Comitato di Liberazione Nazionale (National Liberation Committee) CN Centrodestra Nazionale (National Center-Right) COPASIR Comitato Parlamentare di Controllo per i Servizi di Informazione e Sicurezza e per il Segreto di Stato Italian Politics: Still Waiting for the Transformation 29 (2014): vii–ix © Berghahn Books doi:10.3167/ip.2014.290101 viii Abbreviations (Parliamentary Committee for the Intelligence and Security Services and for State Secret Control) CSD Consiglio Supremo di Difesa (Supreme Council of Defense) CSM Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent Kenneth C
    Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent Kenneth C. Dewar Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d'études canadiennes, Volume 53, Number/numéro 1, Winter/hiver 2019, pp. 178-196 (Article) Published by University of Toronto Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/719555 Access provided by Mount Saint Vincent University (19 Mar 2019 13:29 GMT) Journal of Canadian Studies • Revue d’études canadiennes Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent KENNETH C. DEWAR Abstract: This article argues that the lines separating different modes of thought on the centre-left of the political spectrum—liberalism, social democracy, and socialism, broadly speaking—are permeable, and that they share many features in common. The example of Tom Kent illustrates the argument. A leading adviser to Lester B. Pearson and the Liberal Party from the late 1950s to the early 1970s, Kent argued for expanding social security in a way that had a number of affinities with social democracy. In his paper for the Study Conference on National Problems in 1960, where he set out his philosophy of social security, and in his actions as an adviser to the Pearson government, he supported social assis- tance, universal contributory pensions, and national, comprehensive medical insurance. In close asso- ciation with his philosophy, he also believed that political parties were instruments of policy-making. Keywords: political ideas, Canada, twentieth century, liberalism, social democracy Résumé : Cet article soutient que les lignes séparant les différents modes de pensée du centre gauche de l’éventail politique — libéralisme, social-démocratie et socialisme, généralement parlant — sont perméables et qu’ils partagent de nombreuses caractéristiques.
    [Show full text]
  • The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3
    EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3 02 Editorial by the Danish Minister for European Aff airs 4 03 Why a Committee of the Regions? 6 Building bridges between the local, the regional and 04 the global - Danish Members at work 9 05 Danish Delegation to the Committee of the Regions 12 06 The decentralised Danish authority model 17 EU policy is also domestic policy 07 - Chairmen of Local Government Denmark and Danish Regions 20 08 EU-funded projects in Denmark 22 09 The 5th European Summit of Regions and Cities 26 10 Calendar of events 28 11 Contacts 30 EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions Editorial by the President of 01 the Committee of the Regions Meeting the challenges together We have already had a taste of Danish culture via NOMA, recognised as the best restaurant in the world for two years running by the UK’s Restaurants magazine for putting Nordic cuisine back on the map. Though merely whetting our appetites, this taster has confi rmed Denmark’s infl uential contribution to our continent’s cultural wealth. Happily, Denmark’s contribution to the European Union is far more extensive and will, undoubtedly, be in the spotlight throughout the fi rst half of 2012! A modern state, where European and international sea routes converge, Denmark has frequently drawn on its talents and fl ourishing economy to make its own, distinctive mark. It is in tune with the priorities for 2020: competitiveness, social inclusion and the need for ecologically sustainable change.
    [Show full text]
  • Independentism and the European Union
    POLICY BRIEF 7 May 2014 Independentism and the European Union Graham Avery Independentism1 is a live issue in Europe today. In the European Union separatist parties have gained votes in Scotland, Catalonia, Flanders and elsewhere2, and referendums are in prospect. In Eastern Europe Crimea's referendum has led to an international crisis. This note addresses some basic questions raised by these developments: • What is the European Union's policy on independentism? • Is the division of a member state into two states bad for the EU? • How is the organisational structure of the EU relevant to independentism? BACKGROUND The situation on the ground in the EU today may be summarised as follows: Scotland: a referendum on independence will take place in Scotland on 18 September 2014. The Scottish National Party, which won a majority of seats in the Scottish elections of 2011 and formed a government, is campaigning for 'yes'. Although the British parliament agreed to the referendum, the main political parties in London are campaigning for 'no'. Opinion polls show that 'no' has more supporters than 'yes', but the gap has diminished, many voters are undecided, and the result may be close.3 Catalonia: in regional elections in 2012 the alliance Convergence and Union (Convergència i Unió) won 31% of the vote and formed a coalition government, which has announced a referendum on independence for 9 November 2014. Since Spain's Parliament has declared it unconstitutional, the referendum may not take place. But the next regional elections may effectively become a substitute for a referendum. Belgium: the New Flemish Alliance (Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie) gained ground in national elections in 2010 on a platform of independence for Flanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism, Voters and Cleavages in Bulgarian Politics*
    56 POLITOLOGICKÝ ČASOPIS / CZECH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE 1/2017 Populism, Voters and Cleavages in Bulgarian Politics* EMILIA ZANKINA** Abstract The growing success of populist parties from across the political spectrum in Europe calls for an examination of the link between populist parties and voters and the new (if new indeed) cleavages that such parties exploit. Scholars have pointed to the erosion of traditional cleavages as one rea- son for the success of populist parties. Such analysis fits well with the established democracies of Europe but has little application in the East European context. Traditional cleavages have taken root in few places in Eastern Europe before communist takeover and became even less relevant follow- ing four and a half decades of communist rule. With the fall of communist regimes across Eastern Europe, the only meaningful division within society was that of anti-communists and supporters of the old regime. Similarly, concepts of Left and Right had (and to a great extend continue to have) lit- tle relevance in the East European context where the Left came to be dominated by former commu- nist parties and the Right engulfed an ideologically incoherent opposition. The stronger the former communists were (such as in Bulgaria and Romania) the more fragmented the Right was, as it was the only available space for political competition. The present paper aims to examine voter support for populist parties in Bulgaria and analyze on the cleavages that those parties exploit or create. Thus, the paper examines the impact of populist parties on the political landscape in terms of the changes that those parties result in in voter behavior and cleavage formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciupanel 2014-2016
    CIUPANEL 2014-2016 Crisis and challenges in Spain: attitudes and political behaviour during the economic and the political representation crisis. Pre- and Post- General election dataset 2015-2016: CNEP variables Variable Information Document Version February, 5th, 2016 Mariano Torcal, Sergio Martini, Danilo Serani Crisis and challenge in Spain - Torcal, Martini, Serani Proyecto de investigación patrocinado por el: En colaboración con: Como citar los datos: Torcal, M., Martini, S., Serani, D. (2016). Crisis y reto en la ciudadanía en España: actitudes y comportamiento político de los españoles ante la crisis económica y de representación política (CIUPANEL). Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (CSO2013-47071-R, 2014-2016, PI: Mariano Torcal). How to quote this dataset: Torcal, M., Martini, S., Serani, D. (2016). Crisis and challenges in Spain: attitudes and political behaviour during the economic and the political representation crisis (CIUPANEL). Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CSO2013-47071-R, 2014-2016, PI: Mariano Torcal). Crisis and challenge in Spain - Torcal, Martini, Serani Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Description of the sample and the data files ......................................................................................... 2 A1. Objective of the survey .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways out of Violence Desecuritization and Legalization of Bildu and Sortu in the Basque Country Bourne, Angela
    Roskilde University Pathways out of violence Desecuritization and legalization of Bildu and Sortu in the Basque Country Bourne, Angela Published in: Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Publication date: 2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Bourne, A. (2018). Pathways out of violence: Desecuritization and legalization of Bildu and Sortu in the Basque Country. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 17(3), 45-66. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 17, No 3, 2018, 45-66. Copyright © ECMI 2018 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/201 8/Bourne.pdf Pathways out of Violence: Desecuritization and Legalization of Bildu and Sortu in the Basque Country Angela Bourne Roskilde University Abstract In this article, I examine political processes leading to the legalization of the Batasuna- successor parties, Bildu and Sortu.
    [Show full text]
  • There Has Been No Bulgarian Tradition of Any Long-Standing Resistance to the Communist Regime
    There has been no Bulgarian tradition of any long-standing resistance to the communist regime. There was neither any political opposition, nor any other kind of an influential dissident movement. Bulgaria never went through the purgatory of the Hungarian uprising of 1956, or the “Prague spring” of 1968. It is indeed difficult to find any counter arguments whatsoever against the cliché that Bul- garia was the closest satellite of the Soviet Union. The fundamental contradictions within the Union of Democratic Forces (SDS) coalition were present from the very first day of its inception. There were Marxists who were longing for “socialism with a human face”, intellectuals with liberal ideas, social democrats and Christian democrats, conservatives and radical demo- crats, monarchists and republicans. The members of the center-right coalition did not delude themselves about their differences; they rather shared the clear un- derstanding that only a painful compromise could stand some chances against the Goliath of the totalitarian Bulgarian Communist Party (BKP). It was this unani- mous opposition to the communist regime and its legacy that made the coalition possible. But only for a limited period of time. The United Democratic Forces (ODS) government under Prime Minister Ivan Kostov (1997-2001) completed the reformist agenda of anti-communism. At the end of the ODS term of office, Bulgaria was a country with a functioning market economy, stable democracy, and a clearly outlined foreign policy course towards the country’s accession to the European Union and NATO, which was accepted by all significant political formations, the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) included.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertreter Aus Südtirol in Rom Und in Europa 154 Das Südtirol-Handbuch 2017 Vertreter Aus Südtirol in Rom Und in Europa
    Vertreter aus Südtirol in Rom und in Europa 154 Das Südtirol-Handbuch 2017 Vertreter aus Südtirol in Rom und in Europa Parlamentswahlen und Parlamentarier Parlamentswahlen am 18.4.1948 Kammer: Parteien Stimmen % SVP 107.059 62,70 DC 37.392 21,80 Volksfront 13.218 7,70 Vereinigte Sozialisten 10.262 5,90 Blocco Naz. 3.263 1,90 Insgesamt 171.149 100% Senat: Wahlkreis Bozen Wahlkreis Brixen Parteien Stimmen % Parteien Stimmen % SVP 36.378 48,90 SVP 58.852 82,55 DC 21.512 28,92 DC 8.802 12,34 PRI 4.065 5,46 PRI 1.754 2,46 Blocco Naz. 3.553 4,78 Social- Social- comunisti 8.889 11,95 comunisti 1.890 2,65 Abkürzungen: SVP = Südtiroler Volkspartei; DC = Democrazia Cristiana; PRI = Partito Repubblicano Italiano. Kammerabgeordnete der Provinz Bozen 1948-53: Otto von Guggenberg (SVP), Friedl Volgger (SVP), Toni Ebner (SVP), Angelo Facchin (DC); Senatoren: Karl von Braitenberg (SVP), Josef Raffeiner (SVP). Das Südtirol-Handbuch 2017 155 Parlamentswahlen am 7.6.1953 Kammer: Parteien Stimmen % SVP 118.394 60,06 DC 34.720 17,61 PSI 11.510 5,84 MSI 9.141 4,64 PCI 8.025 4,07 PSDI 6.286 3,19 PNM 4.764 2,42 U. Soc. Ind. 1.856 0,94 PLI 1.036 0,53 PRI 646 0,33 PPTT 393 0,20 Unitá Popol. 340 0,17 Insgesamt 197.111 100% Senat: Wahlkreis Bozen Wahlkreis Brixen Parteien Stimmen % Parteien Stimmen % SVP 40.591 45,53 SVP 66.548 83,78 DC 20.967 23,52 PSI 13.604 15,26 DC 10.420 13,12 MSI 6.100 6,84 PSDI 4.639 5,20 PNM 3.244 3,64 PCI 2.459 3,10 Insgesamt 89.145 100% Insgesamt 79.427 100% Abkürzungen: PSI = Partito Socialista Italiano; PSDI = Partito Socialista Democra- tico Italiano; MSI = Movimento Sociale Italiano; PCI = Partito Comunista Italiano; PLI = Partito Liberale Italiano; PNM = Partito Nazionale Monarchico; Soc.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Vote for Populist Parties: the Impact of the Political Trust, the Economic and the Political Context Danilo Serani De
    Explaining vote for populist parties: the impact of the political trust, the economic and the political context Danilo Serani Department of Political and Social Sciences Universitat Pompeu Fabra [email protected] Abstract Over the last decades, the uneven electoral success of populist parties in Europe sparked the interest of many scholars. Until now, special attention has been devoted only to radical (especially right-wing) populist parties, at the same time as the impact of political trust on the vote for these parties has not been sufficiently addressed. In this paper, I focus on the direct and conditional effects of the trust in the main political actors on the vote for radical and non-radical populist parties. By using data from the European Social Survey (2004- 2014), this paper investigates the association between political trust and the Great Recession, as well as with the ideological convergence of the establishment parties. The results seem to confirm that political (dis)trust has a direct impact on the vote for a populist party, and its effects are accentuated during a crisis and when the establishment parties converge to the center. Key words Political trust, voting behavior, populism, multilevel analysis, economic crisis Paper prepared for the WAPOR Conference, Barcelona, November 24-25th 2016 This is a draft, please do not quote or circulate without author’s permission Introduction Over the last three decades, Europe witnessed the spread of the third wave of populism (Mudde, 2007). Far from being a transitory anomaly of liberal democracies, populist challengers of the establishment parties managed themselves to consolidate their position in the party systems.
    [Show full text]