DOCSLIB.ORG

The Tank and Mechanized Fantry Battalion Task Force

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE TANK AND MECHANIZED FANTRY BATTALION TASK FORCE 71 2 Pentagon Libra (A fa R-PL) ATTN: Military cum V- ■s Section o • ^ Room 1A518, Pe¡% Washington, DC ■j AUTHOR a. ■y 3 ft 7/ TIT LC OUB NA .,**1 *- ■ t f 1 r - *7'-sfe, 2.-7 FM 71-2* {eld Manual Jo. 71-2 ^ A \ I CN^ . / HEADQUARTERS N ^Yir liJ/Tr DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (j^3--vyfvW| v^as*1'ngton' June 1977 THE TANK AND MECHANIZED INFANTRY BATTALION TASK FORCE ■PREFACE THE BATTALION TASK FORCE is a combination of tank and mechanized infaWry companies and other units grouped under command of the headquarters of a tank or mechanized infantry battalion. Frequently, attack helicopter units may operate with the battalion task force, which will normally be supported by field and air defense Artillery. Sometimes it’s supported by USAF tactical fighter Nbombers. A wide range of engineer, signal, and logistics support is available and may, from time to time, be part of the battalion, task force. The battalion task force is then a combined arms team. This manual describes how the battalion task force fights. Da doing so, it discusses employ- ment of company teams which may be part of the battalion task force. For additional details about how company teams fight, the reader should use FM 71-1, Tfye Tank and Mechanized Infantry Company Team. The battalion task force fights as part of a brigade. The brigade is a combination of tank and mechanized infantry task forces and other units grouped under Command of a brigade headquarters. How the brigade fights isi described in FM 71- 100, Brigade and Division Operations (Mechanized/ Armor). To fight successfully in modern battle, tqe battalion task force must accomplish several basic tasks. These tasks are common to all combat operations, and are so important they must be discussed briefly before describing how che task force fights. The first battlefield task the battalion task fèrce must perform is to SEE the enemy and the battlefield, to SEE them better than the enemy does so the task force has the advantage—gets the drop on the enemy. •This publication supersedes FM 17-1,14 October 1966, including all changes, and FM 17-15, 25 March 1966, including all changes. Pentagon Library (ANR-Pfc ATTN: Military Doeuments^ection Room 1A518, Pentagon Washington, DC 20310-6050' —FM 71-2 In order to see the enemy, it will be necessary to MOVE. The task force MOVES to SEE and MOVES to fight. For when fighting outnumbered, which the task force must expect to do most of the time, it will be necessary to MOVE to mass sufficient force to accomplish its mission. In order to move and see and move and fight, it will be necessary for the task force to suppress enemy weapons that can interfere with the task force’s ability to accomplish its mission. Direct and indirect fires must be organized and employed in such a manner that sufficient SUPPRESSION is provided to enable the battalion task force to move. In order to accomplish its mission, it will be necessary for the task force to destroy enough of the enemy to convince him to break off his attack, to give up a defensive area, or to move away from an area vital to friendly forces. To see, suppress, move, and destroy requires effective command control. The battalion task force is equipped with communications equipment that will enable the commander to control the maneuver and fires of his forces. This equipment, however, is extremely vulnerable to enemy countermeasures, and Threat forces are well-equipped and trained to conduct electronic countermeasure operations. Therefore, tight discipline and imaginative control alternatives must be employed by the task force commander to insure positive control at all times. Finally, the battalion task force must be supported with combat support, and with the sinews of war— that is, the fuel, ammunition, and maintenance support necessary to keep the battalion task force seeing, suppressing, moving, and destroying. Careful organiza- tion and aggressive operation of support activities are essential to task force operations. The purpose of this manual is to describe how the battalion task force fights—how it conducts operations to see, suppress, and move to destroy the enemy, and how it maintains control and supports itself in battle. ii FM 71-2 THE TANK AND MECHANIZED INFANTRY BATTALION TASK FORCE TTaibD© ©if ComraeDTiis PAGE Preface i CHAPTERS: 1. The Battalion Task Force on the Modern Battlefield .. .1-1 2. The Enemy in Modern Battle 2-1 3. Organization andOperation of a BattalionTaskForce..3-1 4. Offensive Operations 4-1 5. Defensive Operations 5-1 6. ReconnaissanceandSecurity 6-1 7. Combat Support 7-1 8. Combat Service Support 8-1 APPENDICES: A. Command, Control and Communications- Electronics A-1 B. Warning, Operation, and Fragmentary Orders B-1 C. Records and Reports C-1 D. Breakoutfrom Encirclement D-1 E. Linkup, Passage of Lines and Relief in Place E-1 F. Military Operations in Built-up Areas(MOBA) F-1 G. Operations in Active Nuclear, Biological, or Chemical Conditions G-1 H. Road Marches and Assembly Areas H-1 I. Air Defense 1-1 J. Antitank Platoon J-1 K. Prisoners of War and Captured Enemy Documents K-1 Hi Table of Contents (continued) APPENDICES: L. Training the Battalion Task Force L-1 (continued) M. Functions of the Staff M-1 N. Symbols and Control Measures N-1 0. Relevant Standardization Agreements (STANAGS) .. 0-1 iv CHAPTER 1 The Battalion Task Force on the Modern Battlefield - OVERVIEW DURING THE PAST SEVERAL DECADES, the nature of battle has changed—not abruptly, but nonethelesss significantly. As a result, the modem battlefield presents challenges greater than the battalion task force commander has ever had to face. Recent wars and weapons development may well portend the nature of future wars: PROLIFERATION—The major powers and understand their capabilities and limitations client states have developed and fielded an and also understand battle dynamics. He unprecedented array of sophisticated weapon must be able to concentrate his forces so that systems. a favorable force ratio exists at the critical INTENSITY—Recent wars have demon- place and at the critical time. The history of strated heretofore unknown intensity in armored battle tells us that this can be done. terms of materiel and weapon systems losses But, in order to do it, the task force over short time periods. commander must maximize his own COMPLEXITY—The number of sophisti- weapons capabilities while at the same time cated systems that must be brought together minimizing their vulnerability to the enemy. to achieve the full measure of combat power has tremendously increased the complexity of battle. CONTENTS DISTANCE—New sophisticated weapons have greater range and lethality than those PAGE of previous wars. As a result, the engagement OVERVIEW 1-1 will begin at distances far greater than has MODERN WEAPONS CAPABILITIES 1-2 been the case in the past. Tanks 1-2 MOBILITY—With the increase in the Mechanized Infantry 1-4 proportion of armored and mechanized forces Antitank Guided Missiles 1-5 and the advent of the helicopter, mobility has Field Artillery 1-6 greatly increased, facilitating the rapid Mines 1-7 concentration of forces. Air 1-8 TEMPO—The shorter duration of Observation Devices 1-8 engagements and the resultant decrease in MOBILITY 1-9 time to engage large numbers of highly SUPPRESSION 1-11 mobile targets in enemy armored formations places a premium on well-trained, highly NUCLEAR. BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL proficient crews and units. OPERATIONS (NBC) 1-13 COMMAND CONTROL 1-13 To win on this lethal battlefield, the task SUMMARY 1-14 force commander must skillfully apply his weapon systems. He must thoroughly 1-1 — FM 71-2 MODERN WEAPONS CAPABILITIES Tanks—The tank with its cross-country mobility, its armor protection, and its formidable firepower, has been and is likely to remain the most important weapon in the battalion task force. The accuracy of tank guns gives them a high probability of a first round hit and the lethality is such that if the target is hit it will be killed. PROBABILITY OF A T-62 HITTING AN M60A1 PMETERS -» 0 1500 2000 1 r^i.o A Soviet T-62 tank has a better than 50/50 chance of hitting an M60 tank standing in the open at a range of 1500 meters (about 1 mile), and just less than a 50/50 .5 chance of killing it. However, if the M60A1 is moving at 12 mph, ■ssi it is 25% less vulnerable. If it is hull down (so that all but the turret is behind cover), it is 50% less vulnerable. Thus, these charts .0 dramatically illustrate to the battalion task force commander the importance of demanding that ÊSgâgl his tanks and APCs use hull down firing positions to the maximum o Ü u Jo 9/(o 9/(o extent possible. q)(ô)(ô)@(5)(5 STANDING MOVING HULL DOWN 1.0 .6 .4 .2 ^METERS* 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 , PROBABILITY OF A T-62 KILLING AN M60A1 1-2 FM 71-2 — It is important to remember that capabilities of US and Threat weapons are about equal. While one side may gain temporary advantage from materiel developments, the other soon offsets the advantage with similar improvements. RANGE IN METERS 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 (APFSDS) 100% The probability of kill of the M60A1 and the T-62 are approximately equal. Therefore, 60 any significantadvantage must be 50 gained by skillful tactics, sound 40 training, and good leadership. For (ARDS) example, it is possible to gain a significantadvantage by FIRING- 20 FAST-FIRST.
Recommended publications
  • Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's

    Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's

    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2021 Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era Briggs Evans East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Briggs, "Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3927. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3927 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Briggs Evans August 2021 _____________________ Dr. Stephen Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry Antkiewicz Dr. Steve Nash Keywords: Blitzkrieg, doctrine, operational warfare, American military, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, World War II, Cold War, Soviet Union, Operation Desert Storm, AirLand Battle, Combined Arms Theory, mobile warfare, maneuver warfare. ABSTRACT Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era by Briggs Evans The evolution of United States military doctrine was heavily influenced by the Wehrmacht and their early Blitzkrieg campaigns during World War II.
  • JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters

    JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters

    Joint Publication 3-33 Joint Task Force Headquarters 30 July 2012 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for the formation and employment of a joint task force (JTF) headquarters to command and control joint operations. It provides guidance on the JTF headquarters’ role in planning, preparing, executing, and assessing JTF operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for US military coordination with other US Government departments and agencies during operations and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise.
  • Army Medic~Orps

    Army Medic~Orps

    J R Army Med Corps: first published as 10.1136/jramc-78-02-01 on 1 February 1942. Downloaded from VOL. LXXVIII. FEBRUARY, 1942. No. 2. Authors are alone responsible for the statements _' ("...8<:8. 0 4~~ mad. ODd ... opinioruo ........... in ,'oh "P~ :!t ~({!1gr ~o~'1I)!;$ ~"- .~ ~ ~ 1,/~~~' Journal .~ • ~~40~ ~ of the ~~' O~ _ Royal Army Medic~orps. Original Communications. 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. " BLITZKRIEG." AN APPRECIATION. By BRI(!ADIER E. M. COWELL, C.B., CB.E., D.S.a., T.D. THIS is the title of a small book written by F. O. Miksche and recently published by Faber and Faber Ltd., London. The author, an officer of the Regular Army :of the Czechoslovak Republic for twelve years, served with distinction with the Republican forces in the late War in Spain. The book is described by Tom Wintringham in his introduction as "a Conti­ nental, a European\ essay on Tactics." LieutenantMiksche writes with a sound knowledge of Germal1 tactics and a practical experience of Total War. He is in a position to be able to describe' tJ.()t only the plans for attack' on the new lines exploited by the http://militaryhealth.bmj.com/ Germans with their ,armoured and motorized forces but also the methods to be adopted in defence in depth, as employed so brilliantly by our gallant Russian allies to-day. ' All medical officers in a Field Force will perform their duties with success 'proportional to their knowl~dge'oftactics. Whether it be the Regimental Medical Officer or the Director of Medical Services, m~dical arral~gements wiIH,,\iluilless'the tictical situation be studied, understood and appreciated tram a ptactical angle.
  • Future of Defense Task Force Report 2020 Cover Photo Credit: NASA Future of Defense Task Force

    Future of Defense Task Force Report 2020 Cover Photo Credit: NASA Future of Defense Task Force

    draft Future of Defense Task Force Report 2020 Cover photo credit: NASA Future of Defense Task Force FUTURE OF DEFENSE TASK FORCE September 23, 2020 The Honorable Adam Smith Chairman House Armed Services Committee 2216 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 The Honorable William “Mac” Thornberry Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee 2216 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Chairman Smith and Ranking Member Thornberry: Thank you for your support in standing up the Future of Defense Task Force. We are pleased to present you with our final report. Sincerely, Seth Moulton Jim Banks Chair Chair Future of Defense Task Force Future of Defense Task Force Susan Davis Scott DesJarlais Member of Congress Member of Congress Chrissy Houlahan Paul Mitchell Member of Congress Member of Congress Elissa Slotkin Michael Waltz Member of Congress Member of Congress Future of Defense Task Force Table of Contents PROLOGUE ............................................................................................... 1 TASK FORCE MEMBERS ........................................................................ 3 FINDINGS .................................................................................................. 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................... 13 EVIDENCE .............................................................................................. 21 EMERGING
  • DIVS Unit 3: Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions

    DIVS Unit 3: Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions

    Unit 3: Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions STUDENT GUIDE Unit 3 Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions Objectives By the end of this unit, students will be able to: • Describe the role and responsibilities of the Strike Team Leader and Task Force Leader • Describe the difference between a Strike Team and a Task Force • Explain the purpose of using a Strike Team or Task Force as it relates to managing resources • Explain what information the Strike Team Leader and Task Force Leader provide the Division/Group Supervisor Methodology This unit uses lecture, exercise, and discussion. Content from the Unit 3 will be tested during the Final Exam. Instructors will evaluate students’ initial understanding of the Operations Section through the facilitation of Exercise 2. The purpose of Exercise 2 is to illustrate that the Division/Group Supervisor must become a manager of multiple resources; the Supervisor must make a transition from a doer to a manager. By having groups of students compare and contrast the positions of Division/Group Supervisor, Strike Team/Task Force Leader, Incident Commander, and Operations Section Chief/Branch Director, the purpose of this exercise should be fulfilled. Page 3-2 Course E-960: Division/Group Supervisor —Student Guide May 2012 Unit 3 Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions Time Plan A suggested time plan for this unit is shown below. More or less time may be required, based on the experience level of the group. Topic Time Lesson 30 minutes Exercise 2 30 minutes Total Time 1 hour May 2012 Course E-960: Division/Group Supervisor —Student Guide Page 3-3 Unit 3 Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions Topic Unit Title Slide Key Points Scope Statement Through this unit, students will gain a general understanding of the roles and responsibilities of Strike Team Leaders and Task Force Leaders.
  • The U.S. Military's Force Structure: a Primer

    The U.S. Military's Force Structure: a Primer

    CHAPTER 2 Department of the Army Overview when the service launched a “modularity” initiative, the The Department of the Army includes the Army’s active Army was organized for nearly a century around divisions component; the two parts of its reserve component, the (which involved fewer but larger formations, with 12,000 Army Reserve and the Army National Guard; and all to 18,000 soldiers apiece). During that period, units in federal civilians employed by the service. By number of Army divisions could be separated into ad hoc BCTs military personnel, the Department of the Army is the (typically, three BCTs per division), but those units were biggest of the military departments. It also has the largest generally not organized to operate independently at any operation and support (O&S) budget. The Army does command level below the division. (For a description of not have the largest total budget, however, because it the Army’s command levels, see Box 2-1.) In the current receives significantly less funding to develop and acquire structure, BCTs are permanently organized for indepen- weapon systems than the other military departments do. dent operations, and division headquarters exist to pro- vide command and control for operations that involve The Army is responsible for providing the bulk of U.S. multiple BCTs. ground combat forces. To that end, the service is orga- nized primarily around brigade combat teams (BCTs)— The Army is distinct not only for the number of ground large combined-arms formations that are designed to combat forces it can provide but also for the large num- contain 4,400 to 4,700 soldiers apiece and include infan- ber of armored vehicles in its inventory and for the wide try, artillery, engineering, and other types of units.1 The array of support units it contains.
  • The Strategic Postures of China and India: a Visual Guide

    The Strategic Postures of China and India: a Visual Guide

    MARCH 2020 The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide Frank O’Donnell Alex Bollfrass Force Tables Reference Sheet This document contains the accompanying tables for “The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide.” See the full report and the accompanying interactive maps at belfercenter.org/StrategicPostures The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide | Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs | March 2020 1 Ground Forces: China Icon Name Parent Force Type Force Numbers Location Command Tibet Military 52nd Mountain Infantry Brigade HQ Infantry Brigade ~ 4,600 (total) Link District (MD) Unit 77675, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade Unit 77678, Artillery Regiment, 52nd Tibet MD Artillery Regiment ~ 1,100 Link Mountain Infantry Brigade 1st Battalion, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 2nd Battalion, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 3rd Battalion, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 4th Battalion, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 53rd Mountain Infantry Brigade HQ Tibet MD Infantry Brigade ~ 4,600 (total) Link Unit 77680, 53rd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade Artillery Regiment, Unit 77683, 53rd Tibet MD Artillery Regiment ~ 1,100 Link Mountain Infantry Brigade 1st Battalion, 53rd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 2nd Battalion, 53rd Mountain Infantry
  • Soviet Blitzkrieg: the Battle for White Russia, 1944

    Soviet Blitzkrieg: the Battle for White Russia, 1944

    EXCERPTED FROM Soviet Blitzkrieg: The Battle for White Russia, 1944 Walter S. Dunn, Jr. Copyright © 2000 ISBNs: 978-1-55587-880-1 hc 978-1-62637-976-3 pb 1800 30th Street, Suite 314 Boulder, CO 80301 USA telephone 303.444.6684 fax 303.444.0824 This excerpt was downloaded from the Lynne Rienner Publishers website www.rienner.com D-FM 11/29/06 5:06 PM Page vii CONTENTS List of Illustrations ix Preface xi Introduction 1 1 The Strategic Position 17 2 Comparison of German and Soviet Units 35 3 Rebuilding the Red Army and the German Army 53 4 The Production Battle 71 5 The Northern Shoulder 83 6 Vitebsk 95 7 Bogushevsk 117 8 Orsha 139 9 Mogilev 163 10 Bobruysk 181 11 The Southern Shoulder 207 12 Conclusion 221 Appendix: Red Army Reserves 233 Bibliography 237 Index 241 About the Book 249 vii D-Intro 11/29/06 5:08 PM Page 1 INTRODUCTION he Battle for White Russia erupted south of Vitebsk on the T morning of 22 June 1944, when Russian artillery began a thun- dering barrage of over a thousand guns, mortars, and rockets that blasted away for 2 hours and 20 minutes in an 18-kilometer-long sec- tor. At the same time a Soviet fighter corps, two bomber divisions, and a ground attack division pummeled the bunkers of General Pfeiffer’s VI Corps with bombs and strafed any foolhardy German troops in the trenches with machine gun fire. The sheer weight of explosives that rained down on the German dugouts and bunkers paralyzed the defenders, especially the new replacements who had arrived during the previous few months.
  • Task Force One Navy

    Task Force One Navy

    Way Forward / 5 Task Force One Navy RESPECT HONOR COURAGE COMMITMENT OUR NAVY TEAM - NAVIGATING a Course TO TRUE NORTH FINAL REPORT TABLE OF COnTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 4 Mission, Structure and Process ......................................................................................................... 4 Current State ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Abstract of Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 7 Way Forward .................................................................................................................................... 10 Closing Remarks .............................................................................................................................. 10 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Task Force One Navy Observations ................................................................................................. 14 Current State ..................................................................................................................................
  • THE GERMAN MOTORIZED INFANTRY REGIMENT Ing Officer to Control the Order in Which Troops Are to Cross

    THE GERMAN MOTORIZED INFANTRY REGIMENT Ing Officer to Control the Order in Which Troops Are to Cross

    * [rmy Military History tif. i l! - E i, .A.. 4 : '4 PECIAL SERIES, NO. 4 OCTOBER 17, 1942 THE GERMAN MOTORIZED INFANTRY REGIMENT _1LIII I ._ I I_.1/_111_I IU I I LIBRARY :,'.,Im:,: II' "I... ASSfIFDE rF, ,I i, ,, ,.r:) Pi-0 D Di R 5i2 ) ',R (:*cAfly S0UW)) rr AS PROTYu| Afi CrIW; ,!, ; F .dm -dd MILITARY INTELLIGENICE SPECIAL SERIES SERVICE No. 4 WAR I)EPARITMENT MIS 4011 Washington, October 17, 1942 NOTICE I. Ia'llieation of the Special S'erics is for the puirp'ose of pr(oviding officers with reasonally co:nfirmed inforllatio il fronl otflicial aIll other reliable sources. 2. Nolndivisional ullits are being sulpillied wvith copies oti a h:lsis simnilat to the al)I)roved distribution for divisionall comiiandils, as follow.s: INF DIV ('AV DIV AIIMI) DIV Div It __.. ___ 8 l)iv Hq _ 8 I)iv lh( _ _ 11 Ren Tr .-- __ '_ )rd (Co -- Sig (2o ____-__._ 2 Sig Tr 2 7 Engr f.n_ ___.. 7 Itelt Sq . 7 'Nigrtlie l1... Med Bn________ __ 7 Ellgr Sq 7 Sell) 1Bl __ 1 QM Bn -_______. 7 led Sq1-. 7 7 Iql I nf Rhegt, t ea;ch IS QMI Sq( 7 Iiv TnElq Ilnf 1n, 7 (each.. (;i3 hIq ('av lBrig, 3 ea(ch r\nlid Itgt, 25 ('( Hq Div Arty S (Cav Itegt, 24) each-. 80t FA ]ti, 7 e(ch__ ''1 FA B11, 7 each __ 28 I-lI Div Arty ...... 3 Ilnf Rlteg .. 25 F'A lEn, 7 each 21 151( 150 I)istiibttion to air Irnits is being nmI(ld by thli A 2 if Arilly Air Fo(r(es.

  • The Command and General Staff School

    SOLUnON Ha.JS£is£ THE COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF SCHOOL •L* \zA2USi Ur XwJLx i_.l 1U —X>Jti JtUSiX UaMxiU IL' Xr.( r.r .' At.\^ft BY oCUv AM, C. &G. S. Sch.. Fort Leevenworth 3-15-80 —25M > INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH THE ATTACK AND DEFENSE OF A RIVER LIKE IN FUTURE WASS. • no. 69 //^r^-y*^/7 £e^tjuC^- Crrf>*'>fr2«-1 Fort Leavenworth, Kanaae, June 2, 1930. MBIORANDOI for the Director Second Tear Class, Command and General Staff School, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas* SUBJECTS A Study of the attack and defense of a river line in future wars* 1. PAPERS ACCOMPANYING. *a. Bibliography for this study. b. This discussion does not attempt to go in to the details of river crossings and the technical means? a very good discussion say " be found in "River Crossings in the Presence of the Enemy by Colonel Robert Noraand, French Army. 4 2* The two chief obstacles to be encountered in any war, ore *MBlmpassable mountains and rivers. The purpose of this study is to consider development* of our present scientific and mechanical age* its influence upon strategical and administrative organisations and the re­ sulting influences upon the attack and defense of a river line. 3•>> Scientific development and the world's industrial ex* P> A 4 pans ion willhave the most to do with our conduct of the wars of tomorrow. Let us glance back to the World War as a starting point* Here we have illustrated the far reaching efforts of the improvement of our fire weapons \u2666 As a defense against them, there was developed a trench system in several lines on both sides protected by
  • Military Units Style Contents

    Military Units Style Contents

    Military Units Style - Colors Unknown Unknown, Pending 2 Friendly Hostile Hostile, S, J, Faker 2 Neutral 1 Neutral 3 Weather 3 Weather 4 Area Blue Copyright © 1999 - 2004 ESRI. Located in: ArcGIS\Bin\Styles\Military Units.style All Rights Reserved. Version: ArcGIS 8.3 1 Military Units Style - Fill Symbols Unknown Unknown, Pending 2 Friendly Hostile Hostile, S, J, Faker 2 Neutral 1 Neutral 3 Weather 3 Weather 4 Area Copyright © 1999 - 2004 ESRI. Located in: ArcGIS\Bin\Styles\Military Units.style All Rights Reserved. Version: ArcGIS 8.3 2 Military Units Style - Marker Symbols à Infantry Soldier  Helicopter - AH Apache Å Missile Launcher Æ Frigate Ê Generic Tank Ç Destroyer Ë Enemy Tank È Submarine SSBN Ì B-2 Stealth É Submarine Attack Ó F-14 Tomcat À Torpedo Ô Fighter ß Explosion Õ FA-18 ! Unit Ö F-5 " Headquarters Unit Ù Fighter # Logistics/Admin Installation Ú Fighter $ Theater Ü Generic Fighter % Corps Ò E-3 AWACS & Supply unit Ï Helicopter - CH-46 Chinook ' Squad Ð Helicopter - AH Cobra ( Section/Platoon Copyright © 1999 - 2004 ESRI. Located in: ArcGIS\Bin\Styles\Military Units.style All Rights Reserved. Version: ArcGIS 8.3 3 Military Units Style - Marker Symbols ) Platoon/Squadron 8 Infantry Battalion * Company/Battery/Troop 9 Infantry Regiment + Battalion/Squadron : Infantry Brigade , Regiment ; Infantry Division - Brigade < Infantry Corps . Division = Infantry Army / Corps > Infantry Mechanized Squad 0 Army ? Infantry Mechanized Section 1 Infantry @ Infantry Mechanized Platoon 2 Infantry Mechanized A Infantry Mechanized Company 3 Armor B Infantry Mechanized Battalion Company 4 Infantry Squad C Infantry Mechanized Regiment 5 Infantry Section D Infantry Mechanized Brigade 6 Infantry Platoon E Infantry Mechanized Division 7 Infantry Company F Infantry Mechanized Corps Copyright © 1999 - 2004 ESRI.