DOCSLIB.ORG

General Assembly Distr.: General 22 April 2004 English Original: English/French/Spanish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Assembly Distr.: General 22 April 2004 English Original: English/French/Spanish United Nations A/CN.4/542 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 April 2004 English Original: English/French/Spanish International Law Commission Fifty-sixth session Geneva, 3 May-4 June and 5 July-6 August 2004 Seventh report on unilateral acts of States By Victor Rodríguez Cedeño, Special Rapporteur Contents Paragraphs Page Abbreviations................................................................... 2 I. Introduction .......................................................... 1–12 4 II. Acts and declarations that may represent the practice of States ................ 13–201 7 A. Acts whereby States assume obligations............................... 13–79 7 B. Acts by which a State waives a right or a legal claim .................... 80–88 44 C. Acts by which as State reaffirms a right or a legal claim ................. 89–178 48 D. Some forms of State conduct which may produce legal effects similar to those of unilateral acts ............................................. 179–186 70 E. Silence and estoppel as principles modifying some State acts ............. 187–201 72 III. Conclusions .......................................................... 202–231 78 Annex Main sources used ............................................................... 82 04-32197 (E) 250604 300604 *0432197* A/CN.4/542 Abbreviations used Actividades ... Actividades, Textos y Documentos de la Política Exterior Española Afr.Y.I.L. African Yearbook of International Law A.D. Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases Yearbook ... Yearbook of the International Law Commission A.D.I. Anuario de Derecho Internacional A.F.D.I. Annuaire Français de Droit International A.S.D.I. Annuaire Suisse de Droit International A.J.I.L. American Journal of International Law B.E.C. Bulletin of the European Communities B.O.C.G. Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales B.O.E. Boletín Oficial del Estado B.Y.B.I.L. British Yearbook of International Law C.A.H.D.I. Committee of Legal Advisers on Public International Law Canadian Y.B.I.L. Canadian Yearbook of International Law D.S.C. Diario de Sesiones del Congreso D.S.S. Diario de Sesiones del Senado E.J.I.L./J.E.D.I. European Journal of International Law/Journal Européen de Droit International For.Aff. Foreign Affairs G. de M. Gaceta de Madrid G.Y.B.I.L. German Yearbook of International Law H.I.L.J. Harvard International Law Journal Harvard L.R. Harvard Law Review I.C.L.Q. International and Comparative Law Quarterly I.C.J. Reports Reports of Judgements, Advisory Opinions and Orders of the International Court of Justice I.L.M. International Legal Materials I.L.R. International Law Reports J.A.I.L. Japanese Annual of International Law Keesing’s Keesing’s Record of World Events N.I.L.R. Netherlands International Law Review 2 A/CN.4/542 N.Y.B.I.L. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law OID Oficina de Información Diplomática Pol.Ext. Política Exterior P.C.I.J. Publ. Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Judgements, Orders and Advisory Opinions) R.S.A. Recueil des Sentences Arbitrales (also referred to as R.I.A.A.) R.I.A.A. Reports of International Arbitral Awards R.E.D.I. Revista Espanola de Derecho Internacional R.P.E. Revista de Política Exterior R.G.D.I.P. Revue Générale de Droit International Public R.H.D.I Revue Hellénique de Droit International S.A.Y.I.L. South African Yearbook of International Law Spanish Y.B.I.L. Spanish Yearbook of International Law 3 A/CN.4/542 I. Introduction 1. At its fifty-fifth session, the International Law Commission established a Working Group on unilateral acts of States, which recommended (recommendation 4) that: “4. The report which the Special Rapporteur will submit to the Commission at its next session will be exclusively as complete a presentation as possible of the practice of States in respect of unilateral acts. It should also include information originating with the author of the act or conduct and the reactions of the other States or other actors concerned”.1 2. The question of the definition of a unilateral act is still under discussion within the Commission. As an interim measure, with a view to being able to make progress with its work, the Commission endorsed the Working Group’s recommendation and adopted the definition given below. While this is only a working definition, it will serve as a basis for the adoption in due course of a definitive definition of a unilateral act which the Commission can use for its work of codification and progressive development: “Recommendation 1 1. For the purposes of the present study, a unilateral act of a State is a statement expressing the will or consent by which that State purports to create obligations or other legal effects under international law”.2 3. In accordance with the Commission’s regular practice, a suitable definition of a unilateral act, one that can be used for purposes of developing rules governing the functioning of this category of legal acts, must be based on adequate consideration of the practice of States. This point was made by a number of members of the Commission in 2003, with reference to the Special Rapporteur’s sixth report. “The examination of State practice was limited. The analysis should focus on relevant State practice for each unilateral act, with regard to its legal effects, requirements for its validity and questions such as revocability and termination; State practice needed to be assessed so as to decide whether it reflected only specific elements or could provide the basis for some more general principles relating to unilateral acts”.3 “It was felt that, based on State practice, unilateral acts which create international obligations could be identified and a certain number of applicable rules developed”.4 4. Similar remarks were made by representatives of several States in the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly in 2003: that in the absence of a systematic analysis of existing State practice in that area it would be difficult, if not premature, to proceed until a wider response from States had been received;5 that at the current __________________ 1 See Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-eighth Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/58/10), para. 308. 2 A/58/10, para. 306. 3 A/58/10, para. 277. 4 A/58/10, para. 282. 5 Statement by Israel, A/C.6/58/SR.17. 4 A/CN.4/542 stage, more information should be gathered on State practice in that field;6 that information on State practice would be useful;7 and that the Special Rapporteur should submit as complete a presentation as possible of the practice of States in respect of unilateral acts.8 5. The Working Group established in 2003 offered some guidelines which the Special Rapporteur has taken into consideration in preparing this report: “Recommendation 5 5. The material assembled on an empirical basis should also include elements making it possible to identify not only the rules applicable to unilateral acts stricto sensu, with a view to the preparation of draft articles accompanied by commentaries, but also the rules which might apply to State conduct producing similar effects. Recommendation 6 6. An orderly classification of State practice should, insofar as possible, provide answers to the following questions: – What were the reasons for the unilateral act or conduct of the State? – What are the criteria for the validity of the express or implied commitment of the State and, in particular, but not exclusively, the criteria relating to the competence responsible for the act or conduct? – In which circumstances and under which conditions can the unilateral commitment be modified or withdrawn? Recommendation 7 7. In his next report, the Special Rapporteur will not submit the legal rules which may be deduced from the material thus submitted. They will be dealt with in later reports so that specific draft articles or recommendations may be prepared”.9 6. As he had stated last year that he would do, the Special Rapporteur — with the invaluable assistance of the University of Málaga, to the professors and students of which he wishes to express his sincere thanks for their excellent work — undertook a study of the practice of States, based on an abundant bibliography (a full list of sources will be found in the annex to this report), from which he has selected a series of unilateral acts, some of which may be useful for the purposes of a consideration of the topic under review. 7. It is important to note that an assessment of the practice of States can only be subjective, inasmuch as Governments’ own views on the nature of their statements are not available; this, indeed, may be one of the characteristics of these acts. Consequently, acts, statements and conduct discussed in this report are essentially factual. __________________ 6 Statement by Portugal, A/C.6/58/SR.19. 7 Statement by Chile, A/C.6/58/SR.19. 8 Statement by France, A/C.6/58/SR.19. 9 A/58/10, para. 308. 5 A/CN.4/542 8. In section II below, an attempt has been made to organize the practice of States by subdividing it into acts that fall into various categories of material acts, as usually designated in international doctrine. These acts, despite previous statements to the contrary, have been assigned to the three categories that appeared to be most satisfactory as a basis for a general classification, namely (a) acts whereby a State assumes obligations (promise and recognition); (b) acts whereby a State renounces a right (renunciation); and (c) acts whereby a State asserts a right or legal claim (protest). Notification is discussed separately; certainly it is no less unilateral from a formal standpoint, but there is some disagreement as to whether it is a unilateral act in the sense with which the Commission is concerned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View the Full Report Here
    Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Definition of Terms 5 2. Introduction 6 3. Functions of the Commission 7 4. Composition of the Commission 8 5. Staff of the Commission 11 6. Activities of the Commission 12 7. Projected and Actual Expenditure of the Court and Commission 14 8. Appointment and Inauguration of New President of the Court 15 9. Interaction with the Trustees and the Trust Fund 16 10. Matters of Note 17 11. Appreciation of Former Chairman 18 12. In Memoriam 21 13. Feature on Guyana 22 14. Snapshots of 2011 26 Appendices: Appendix A: Meetings of the Commission in 2011 27 Appendix B: Attendance of Members at Meetings of the Commission in 2011 27 Appendix C: Meetings of Committees of the Commission in 2011 28 Appendix D: Members of Committees of the Commission in 2011 29 Appendix E: Audited Financial Statements of the Commission 30 for the year ended December 31, 2011 Page 3 Seated L-R: Professor Harold Lutchman, B.Sc., M.Sc., LL.B., Ph.D.; Mr. Jefferson Cumberbatch, LL.B.; the Rt. Hon. Sir Charles Dennis Byron; Dr. Joseph Archibald, Q.C.; Dr. the Hon. Lloyd Barnett, O.J. Standing L-R: Sir Fred Gollop, K.A., Q.C.; Mr. Martin Daly, S.C.; the Hon. Mr. Justice Hugh A. Rawlins; Mr. Emile Ferdinand, LL.B., LL.M.; Ambassador Wendell Lawrence, B.Sc., M.Sc., C.P.A.; Mr. Egbert Lionel, B.Sc., M.A. Page 4 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS In this Report the following terms which are frequently used have the meanings assigned to them below: “the Agreement” means the Agreement Establishing the Caribbean Court of Justice; “the Commission” means the Regional Judicial and Legal Services Commission; “the Court” means the Caribbean Court of Justice; “OECS” means the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States; “the Treaty” means the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas; “the Trustees” means the Board of Trustees of the Trust Fund; “the Trust Fund” means the Caribbean Court of Justice Trust Fund established by the Revised Agreement dated January 12, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Than Neighbors New Developments in the Institutional Strengthening of Mexico’S Armed Forces in the Context of U.S.-Mexican Military Cooperation
    More than Neighbors New Developments in the Institutional Strengthening of Mexico’s Armed Forces in the Context of U.S.-Mexican Military Cooperation By Iñigo Guevara February 2018 More than Neighbors New Developments in the Institutional strengthening of Mexico’s armed forces in the context of US-Mexican Military Cooperation By Iñigo Guevara “With Mexico, very, very strong, quiet military-to-military relations” … … “This is a relationship that has been many decades in the making. Just go back - just for an example - go back to World War II. It doesn't start with us. It will not end with us.” -U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis1 Strategic Reasoning for Closer U.S. –Mexico Military Ties Despite the deep cultural and economic diversity of North America’s 486+ million inhabitants, the interconnectedness of the three countries means that they all face, to various degrees, the same threats, which range from serious to existential. Existential threats have long been narrowed to a nuclear war with Russia, to a much lesser degree China, and the now aspiring North Korea. The lack of an existential threat from the south has meant that Mexico was not a priority for the U.S. defense community. Mexico’s non-interventionist interior-looking foreign policy, the lack of an external threat, and an extremely complex politico-military relationship also meant that the defense relationship with the United States was cordial, but distant over several decades. Since the 1980’s, the Mexican Navy and Air Force did source their token conventional fighting capacity from the United States: a squadron of tactical jet fighters and a flotilla of second-hand destroyers and frigates; however, this was mainly out of convenience rather than a strategic decision to develop binational defense ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Organisations of Guyana
    History and Politicking of Islamic Organisations in Guyana Introduction Muslims make up about fifteen percent of Guyana’s total population (see figure # 2), and they are represented by a plethora of Islamic institutions, both organisations and mosques. Jamiat-ul Ulama-E-Deen was the first Islamic Organisation established in Guyana. It was founded in 1934 by Maulvi Mohammad Ahmad Nasir. The Islamic Association of British Guiana was formed in 1936 to mobilize and preserve the Muslim identity in an ocean of evangelism. In 1936 the IABG published the first Islamic journal in Guyana, which was called Nur-E-Islam. Jamiat and IABG were defunct by the late 1930’s and the Sadr-E-Anjuman filled the void. Present day Guyana is home to a large number of Islamic organisations: Guyana United Sadr Islamic Anjuman (GUSIA), Anjuman Hifazat-ul-Islam (HIFAZ), Central Islamic Organization of Guyana (CIOG), Guyana Islamic Trust (GIT), Muslim Youth League (MYL), Muslim Youth Organization (MYO), Hujjatul Ulama/Tabligh Jamaat, Guyana Muslim Mission, the Guyana Islamic Forum (GIF), Diamond Dar Uloom, Imam Baqir Islamic Centre, and the Guyana Islamic Institute. Tensions exits between the CIOG, HIFAZ, GUSIA, MYL, GIF and the GIT. The oldest surviving organizations are the GUSIA and HIFAZ. HIFAZ, GUSIA and MYL have had a strong relationship and have been cooperating on numerous programmes. GIT sees the practice of Islam by the traditionalists who are those that attached great importance to certain practices those there Muslim ancestors who came from South Asia practiced, as corrupted with innovations (bidah). The CIOG it is trying to accommodate South Asian Muslims of the Hanafi Mazhab who attached great importance’s to some of these “traditional practices.” GIT on the other hand, brand these practices as unorthodox or bidah (innovations) that have no place in Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolition of the Mandatory Death Penalty in Africa: a Comparative Constitutional Analysis
    THE ABOLITION OF THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY IN AFRICA: A COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS Andrew Novak* 1. INTRODUCTION The mandatory death penalty for the crime of murder is in rapid retreat worldwide. Originally diffused to the common law countries of the Caribbean, Africa, and South and Southeast Asia by way of the British Empire, the penalty has been found unconstitutional and incompatible with human rights norms in at least ten Caribbean nations since the year 2000. A new wave of litigation has appeared in the postcolonial common law nations of East and Southern Africa, and courts in Malawi, Uganda, and now Kenya have found an automatic sentence of death unconstitutional and have replaced mandatory schemes with discretionary ones that allow consideration of mitigating factors in the capital sentencing process.1 The resulting criminal justice regimes operate in closer conformity with international human rights norms and explicitly adopt these norms in their domestic legal systems. This harmonization of death penalty regimes across borders is no accident: it was the deliberate intention of a small network of international anti- death penalty advocates to create a body of transnational jurisprudence from which to draw in bringing incremental challenges in national courts.2 By initially petitioning the United Nations Human Rights Committee and the Inter- American Human Rights System to find the mandatory death penalty incompatible with human rights treaty obligations, this core of advocates succeeded in developing a corpus of persuasive reasoning on which they could * Adjunct Professor of African Law, American University Washington College of Law. The author has a Juris Doctor, Boston University School of Law, and a Master of Science (Hons.), African Politics, London School of Oriental and African Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • (At the Service of the Roman Empire) and the Subsequent Economic Imperialism
    Image: Map of Western Europe, by Fernão Vaz Dourado (1520-1580). Estimated actual date: ≈1705. European colonization (at the service of the Roman Empire) and the subsequent Economic Imperialism Author: Andreu Marfull-Pujadas 2017 © All rights reserved Exercise done for the Project of the Scientific Direction "New Chronology" - НЕВ ХРОНОЛОГИЈАА - directed by the professors A.T.Fomenko and G.V.Nosovskiy Work developed in the GLOBAL DIAGRAM OF THE DOUBLE CHRONOLOGICAL MANIPULATION OF THE HUMAN HISTORY - Representation of the Global Chronological Map of the "New Chronology" (Part 3) V.3.0 2017/10/12 Posted on 2018/01/12 Index 1. THE RECONSTRUCTION OF DILATED HISTORY ................................................... 3 1.1. The Empire of Human Civilizations, 10th-21st centuries ......................................................................... 3 1.2. Egypt = Rome = Greece, the Original Empire .......................................................................................... 4 1.3. Archaeology and “ancient” Thought ......................................................................................................... 5 1.4. Jerusalem = Holy Land = Several cities ................................................................................................... 5 1.5. America before to “1492” .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.6. The transformation of the Horde-Ottoman Alliance into the Janua (Genoa)-Palaiologos Alliance .......... 8
    [Show full text]
  • Ramos&Boavida
    Ras Tafari in Lusoland: On the 50th anniversary of Haile Selassie´s I state visit to Portugal, 1959-2009 Exhibition Catalogue Edited by Isabel Boavida and Manuel João Ramos Illustrated by Manuel João Ramos Centro de Estudos Africanos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Índice List of Contributors 5 Illustration Sources 5 Illustrations 7 Diplomatic relationship between Portugal and Ethiopia, 1954-1963 19 Pierre-Etienne Page and Isabel Boavida A state visit in times of change 23 Isabel Boavida The organization and the unfolding of the visit of the Emperor of Ethiopia Haile Sellassie in Portugal, 26th-31st July 1959 27 Pierre-Etienne Page Spilt co!ee: The tipping point Illustrations in Portuguese and Ethiopian relations 31 Manuel João Ramos The Foundation of the Organization of African Unity 35 Aurora Almada e Santos Revisiting Eritrea’s isolation in the regional and global political arenas in the light of
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition in International Law: a Functional Reappraisalt
    Recognition in International Law: A Functional Reappraisalt The ambiguous nature of the doctrine of recognition in international law has contributed to significant academic dispute.1 At least two major theories have been advanced to provide a framework for this part of international law. The "constitutive theory" views recognition as the voluntary act of the recognizing state; the "declaratory theory" accepts recognition as automatic.2 Recognition has both legal and political meanings, both internal and external consequences for the recognizing state.3 The law which applies in one set of circumstances may not necessarily apply in another. In strictly public international law acceptance of a declaratory theory re- quiring immediate admission of the fact of existence of a foreign state seems necessary. If, however, domestic legal issues are also involved, a state may legitimately impose other conditions of its own law and policy, resulting in the operation of some elements of a constitutive standard. Such a distinction can readily be discerned within the existing law. It is consistent both with the maintenance of international order and with the protection of domestic legal integrity. I. CLARIFICATION OF TERMINOLOGY A restricted vocabulary has been used to describe a large quantity of concepts. One distinction traditionally made in the literature is that between recognition of a state and recognition of a government. In the traditional jurisprudence the state is the unit or persona of interna- tional law which is capable of holding rights within the system. 4 A new t Fred L. Morrison, A.B. 1961, University of Kansas; B.A. 1963, Oxford University; M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • GCA Newsletter
    Guyana Cultural Association of New York Inc. on-line Magazine Jan-Mar 30 2018 Vol 8 Issue 3 OF INDEPENDENCE OF THE COOPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA ONE PEOPLE ONE NATION ONE DESTINY PLEDGE OF GUYANA I pledge myself to honor always the Flag of Guyana and to be loyal to my country to be obedient to the laws of Guyana to love my fellow citizens and to dedicate my energies towards the happiness and prosperity of Guyana. Guyana Cultural Association of New York Inc. on-line Magazine IN THIS ISSUE PAGE 3-4: Guyana Parliament EDITORIAL PAGE 7-17: Indian Arrival Day 2018 & hat one may wonder does the bitter seam of sugar 2 Indian Achievement in Guyana. have to do with the word, “happy,” in the first arti- PAGE 18-19: Youth reach out to street 3 dwellers. cle in our combined April-May online magazine? PAGE 20-25:Kiskadee Days HISTORY OF PAGE 27-29: Micro-aggression and W the Caribbean Diaspora Read the articles, the poem, the advertisements and promotions, PAGE 30: Poem: My Grandfather the calendar of events and you will recognize the unified PAGE 32-34: Dax Sampson determination of all the people who call Guyana home, Memorial Scholarship Program THE PARLIAMENT whether they live in what is now termed the Diaspora and have never left the shores of Guyana except through the facility Editor of technology and Guyana. OF GUYANA Dr. Juliet Emanuel Cover Design Claire Goring & Ashton Franklin Together the people inhabiting Guyana over the past two or more centuries have woven together an existence and a living Copy Editors- that characterizes One Nation, One People, One Destiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Two Revolutions: Cultural Relations Between Mexico and Cuba*
    Jahrbuch für Geschichte Lateinamerikas Anuario de Historia de América Latina 54 | 2017 | 108-128 Amelia M. Kiddle University of Calgary Between Two Revolutions Cultural Relations between Mexico and Cuba Except where otherwise noted, this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) https://doi.org/10.15460/jbla.54.23 Between Two Revolutions: * Cultural Relations between Mexico and Cuba Amelia M. Kiddle Abstract. - This article examines the role that Revolutionary Mexican foreign policy played within Mexican and Cuban society through an analysis of the 1938 voyage to Havana of the Brigada Mexicana and the 1939 visit to Mexico of Colonel Fulgencio Batista. These goodwill missions contributed to Mexican and Cuban state formation. In the Mexican case, the goodwill mission created domestic support by providing evidence of international support for the oil expropriation of 1938, and in the Cuban case, it provided legitimacy to the Batista regime by demonstrating affinity with the Mexican Revolution. While visiting Mexico in 1939, Batista witnessed the commemoration of the Constitution of 1917. Although he may not have been influenced to emulate its radical content in the Cuban Constitution of 1940, the two documents came to carry tremendous symbolic weight in the populist politics of both countries. Keywords: Goodwill; Foreign Relations; Cultural Relations; Mexico; Cuba; Lázaro Cárdenas; Fulgencio Batista. Resumen. Este artículo examina el papel que la política exterior del México Revolucionario jugó en las sociedades mexicana y cubana a través de un análisis del viaje de la Brigada Mexicana a La Habana en 1938 y la visita de Fulgencio Batista a México en 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mexican Foreign Policy Tradition
    Fauriol: DIFFERING PERCEPTIONS IN FOREIGN POLICY AND SECURITY: The Mexican DIFFERING PERCEPTIONS IN FOREIGN POLICY AND SECURITY THE MEXICAN FOREIGN POLICY TRADITION Dr. Georges Fauriol* INTRODUCTION Mexico's foreign policy is quite unique. More than any other large country, the Mexican tradition has been to renounce the un- stated assumptions of "power politics." In its place, twentieth cen- tury Mexican decision makers have substituted a defensive foreign policy distilled from their ideology, prudent self-interest and their national experience. In the late 1980s, this has begun to slowly change. Oil, financial crises, tension at Mexico's northern and southern borders, and domestic unrest have altered Mexico's inter- action with the world. It is unclear whether this has altered Mex- ico's perception of its own interests. Mexico's position and participation in international politics thus defies easy categorization. The issue is not whether it has the means to enter the ranks of powerful nations. Mexico is already a signifi- cant nation whose sense of nationalism confirms that. The question is how Mexico will face its overwhelming problems. Positioned to take off industrially with its resources, energy, and growing tech- nology Mexico is an upwardly mobile nation. The global petroleum economy has brought a new challenge to Mexico, that is now forc- ing major choices on Mexican policy. Even with the potential for being a modern state, Mexico does not appear to have the national self-confidence and attendant interests for even regional power aspi- rations. In strategic terms, Mexico has the foundation to become a powerful nation, but appears reluctant to accept the responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Report on Unilateral Acts of States, by Mr. Víctor Rodríguez Cedeño, Special Rapporteur [Original: English/French/Spanish] [22 April 2004]
    UNILATERAL ACTS OF STATES [Agenda item 5] DOCUMENT A/CN.4/542*1 Seventh report on unilateral acts of States, by Mr. Víctor Rodríguez Cedeño, Special Rapporteur [Original: English/French/Spanish] [22 April 2004] CONTENTS Page Multilateral instruments cited in the present report ..................................................................................................................................... 207 Works cited in the present report ................................................................................................................................................................. 208 Paragraphs INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1–12 211 Chapter I. ACTS AND DECLARATIONS THAT MAY REPRESENT THE PRACTICE OF STATES................................................................................................. 13–201 212 A. Acts whereby States assume obligations .................................................................................................................................... 13–79 212 B. Acts by which a State waives a right or a legal claim................................................................................................................. 80–88 232 C. Acts by which a State reaffirms a right or a legal claim ............................................................................................................. 89–178
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Political Science Dissertations Department of Political Science 5-9-2016 Extraterritorial Courts and States: Learning from the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Harold Young Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_diss Recommended Citation Young, Harold, "Extraterritorial Courts and States: Learning from the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2016. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_diss/40 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Political Science at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXTRATERRITORIAL COURTS AND STATES: LEARNING FROM THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL by HAROLD AVNON YOUNG Under the Direction of Amy Steigerwalt, PhD ABSTRACT In 2015, South Africa withdrew from the International Criminal Court asserting United Nation’s Security Council bias in referring only African cases (Strydom October 15, 2015; Duggard 2013) and the United Kingdom reiterated a pledge to withdraw from the European Court of Human Rights, asserting that the court impinges on British sovereignty (Watt 2015). Both are examples of extraterritorial courts which are an important part of regional and global jurisprudence. To contribute to our understanding of the relationship between states and extraterritorial courts, I examine arguably the first and best example of an extraterritorial court, namely the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC). Drawing on 50 British Commonwealth states, this dissertation explores the factors influencing the decision to accede to an extraterritorial court and why some states subsequently opt to sever ties.
    [Show full text]