DOCSLIB.ORG

Third Small Towns' Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project-Tikapur

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Third Small Towns' Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project-Tikapur Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 35173-013 November 2015 NEP: Third Small Towns’ Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project-Tikapur Town Subproject Prepared by the Ministry of Urban Development for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Initial Environmental Examination on Tikapur Water Supply and Sanitation Project Government of Nepal Ministry of Urban Development Department of Water Supply and Sewerage Third Small Towns Water Supply & Sanitation Sector Project Project Management Office Panipokhari, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Of Tikapur Town Water Supply and Sanitation Project March 2015 Prepared by TAEC Consultant Pvt. Ltd. / Integrated Consultants Nepal Pvt. Ltd. JV Initial Environmental Examination on Tikapur Water Supply and Sanitation Project Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank AP Affected person C-EMP Contractor‟s environmental management plan DWSS Department of Water Supply and Sewerage EARF Environmental assessment and review framework EIA Environmental impact assessment EMP Environmental management plan EMR Environmental monitoring report EPA Environment Protection Act EPR Environment Protection Rules EO Environmental Officer ES Environmental Specialist ESA Environmental Safeguard Assistant ESE Environmental Safeguard Expert HHs Households IEE Initial Environmental Examination GoN Government of Nepal GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism MoSTE Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment MoUD Ministry of Urban Development NPR Nepalese Rupee PISU Project Implementation Support Unit PMO Project Management Office REA Rapid Environmental Assessment SPS Safeguard Policy Statement STWSSSP Small Towns‟ Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project 2ndSTWSSSP Second Small Towns‟ Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project 3rdSTWSSSP Third Small Towns‟ Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project TDF Town Development Fund ToR Terms of Reference VDC Village Development Committee WHO World Health Organization WSSDO Water Supply and Sanitation Divisional Office WUSC Water Users‟ and Sanitation Committee i Initial Environmental Examination on Tikapur Water Supply and Sanitation Project Weights and Measures Lps Litre per second C Celsius/centigrade dBA decibel audible Ha hectare/s Km kilometer/s Kph kilometer/s per hour M meter/s Kph kilometer/s per hour M meter/s m3 cubic meter/s Masl meter/s above sea level mg/l milligram/s per liter Mm millimeter/s NOTES This initial environmental examination (draft) is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB‟s Board of Directors, Management, or staff and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ii Initial Environmental Examination on Tikapur Water Supply and Sanitation Project TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY(NEPALI) .....................................................................................VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................XII A. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ XII B. PURPOSE OF THE IEE ................................................................................................................. XII C. COMPONENTS OF THE SUBPROJECT ........................................................................................... XIII D. CURRENT SITUATION ................................................................................................................. XIII E. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, MITIGATION AND MONITORING ........................................................... XIV F. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ......................................................................................... XV I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 A. NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE INDIVIDUAL INSTITUTION PREPARING THE REPORT .............................. 1 B. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 1 C. PURPOSE OF THE IEE ................................................................................................................... 2 D. NEED FOR THE SUBPROJECT......................................................................................................... 2 E. RELEVANCY OF THE PROJECT ....................................................................................................... 3 F. OVERVIEW OF THE SUBPROJECT ................................................................................................... 3 II. POLICY, LEGAL & ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK................................................ 17 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS .............................................................. 20 III. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................. 24 A. WITH- AND WITHOUT-SUBPROJECT ALTERNATIVES ...................................................................... 24 B. ALTERNATIVES RELATIVE TO PLANNING AND DESIGN.................................................................... 24 IV. DESCRIPTION OF SUBPROJECT ............................................................................... 28 A. SUBPROJECT SITE ...................................................................................................................... 28 B. THE SUBPROJECT ...................................................................................................................... 32 C. THE IEE STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................ 37 V. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................... 38 A. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES .......................................................... 38 B. BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES .............................................................................. 39 C. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES ..................................................................... 40 D. EXISTING WATER SUPPLY SITUATION .......................................................................................... 46 E. EXISTING SANITATION SITUATION ................................................................................................ 50 F. EXISTING INSTITUTIONAL SITUATION ............................................................................................ 52 VI. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .......... 54 A. POSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND BENEFITS ..................................................................... 54 B. IMPACTS/ISSUES/CONCERNS AND MITIGATION MEASURES RELATIVE TO SITTING, PLANNING AND DESIGN ...................................................................................................................................... 54 C. IMPACTS/ISSUES/CONCERNS AND MITIGATION MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION ...................... 54 D. IMPACTS/ISSUES/CONCERNS AND MITIGATION MEASURES DURING OPERATION ............................. 59 E. INDIRECT, INDUCED AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ........................................................................... 59 VII. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION .................. 61 iii Initial Environmental Examination on Tikapur Water Supply and Sanitation Project VIII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM .................................................................. 63 A. PURPOSE OF THE GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM .................................................................. 63 B. PROPOSED SET-UP .................................................................................................................... 63 C. ACCESS TO THE MECHANISM ...................................................................................................... 63 D. GRM STEPS AND TIMEFRAME ..................................................................................................... 64 IX. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................. 67 A. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT .................................................................................................... 67 B. SAFEGUARD IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT ............................................................................ 67 C. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................................................... 88 D. INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Food Security Bulletin - 21
    Food Security Bulletin - 21 United Nations World Food Programme FS Bulletin, November 2008 Food Security Monitoring and Analysis System Issue 21 Highlights Over the period July to September 2008, the number of people highly and severely food insecure increased by about 50% compared to the previous quarter due to severe flooding in the East and Western Terai districts, roads obstruction because of incessant rainfall and landslides, rise in food prices and decreased production of maize and other local crops. The food security situation in the flood affected districts of Eastern and Western Terai remains precarious, requiring close monitoring, while in the majority of other districts the food security situation is likely to improve in November-December due to harvesting of the paddy crop. Decreased maize and paddy production in some districts may indicate a deteriorating food insecurity situation from January onwards. this period. However, there is an could be achieved through the provision Overview expectation of deteriorating food security of return packages consisting of food Mid and Far-Western Nepal from January onwards as in most of the and other essentials as well as A considerable improvement in food Hill and Mountain districts excessive agriculture support to restore people’s security was observed in some Hill rainfall, floods, landslides, strong wind, livelihoods. districts such as Jajarkot, Bajura, and pest diseases have badly affected In the Western Terai, a recent rapid Dailekh, Rukum, Baitadi, and Darchula. maize production and consequently assessment conducted by WFP in These districts were severely or highly reduced food stocks much below what is November, revealed that the food food insecure during April - July 2008 normally expected during this time of the security situation is still critical in because of heavy loss in winter crops, year.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal
    IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal Country Name Nepal Official Name Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal Regional Bureau Bangkok, Thailand Assessment Assessment Date: From 16 October 2009 To: 6 November 2009 Name of the assessors Rich Moseanko – World Vision International John Jung – World Vision International Rajendra Kumar Lal – World Food Programme, Nepal Country Office Title/position Email contact At HQ: [email protected] 1/105 IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Country Profile....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Introduction / Background.........................................................................................................................................5 1.2. Humanitarian Background ........................................................................................................................................6 1.3. National Regulatory Departments/Bureau and Quality Control/Relevant Laboratories ......................................16 1.4. Customs Information...............................................................................................................................................18 2. Logistics Infrastructure .....................................................................................................................................................33 2.1. Port Assessment .....................................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Nepal COVID-19: Cluster Update #33 9 March 2021 COVID-19 situation Positive Recovered Tested for Persons in Persons in Deaths cases cases COVID-19 isolation quarantine 3,012 274,869 270,987 2,199,950 870 56 Source: https://covid19.mohp.gov.np/#/ (as of 9 March 2021) Overview Nepal’s COVID-19 vaccination campaign commenced on 27 January, and the first phase, conducted in two rounds, has now been concluded. The second round of the campaign began on 7 March, targeting people over 55 and with co-morbidities. As of 9 March, a total of 1,116,554 people have received at least one does of a COVID-19 vaccine. Some vaccine hesitancy has been observed among the population, citing concerns over its safety, efficacy and side effects. Half of the 4,257 questions received through various hotlines over the past two weeks have been related to COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine eligibility, vaccine trails, vaccine safety and efficacy, COVID-19 general information and dos and don’ts for recently vaccinated people. Over the past two weeks, seven vulnerable Nepali migrants (all male) stranded abroad were provided with support to return to Nepal in coordination with the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security, and Nepal Embassy in Malaysia and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Ministry of Health and Population organised two rounds of national review of nutrition rehabilitation homes (NRH) between 25-27 January and 10-12 February 2021. The workshop identified key issues and made several recommendations on programme improvement, primarily centring on improving integration of NRHs services and information at local and district levels, as well as with hospitals to enhance coordination and treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Report UPR Nepal FIAN 2
    Universal Periodic Review Violations of the Right to Food in Nepal Submission by FIAN International (July 2010) • Explanation of Organization The following information is submitted by FIAN International in Cooperation with FIAN Nepal in July 2010. FIAN, the Food-first Information and Action Network is an international human rights organization for the right to adequate food with consultative status at the United Nations. FIAN has 18th sections and coordinations in different countries and works in further countries together with partner organizations. FIAN International also has thousands individual members across the globe. FIAN Nepal is one of the national sections of FIAN International. • Summary The aim of the following report is to draw attention to the wide range of stakeholders on Right to Food violations, related to food access in Nepal. Many of these problems have existed for quite some time; some surfaced as early as 1970s. Yet, they have not been met with any solutions thus far. However, the International Human Rights treaties and other international law sources recognizing the Right to Food the state of Nepal has committed to, as well as its Interim Constitution, which was adopted in 2007, obligate the government to adopt measures to realize the right to adequate food in these cases. On May 14 th 1991 the South-Asian state of Nepal ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). In addition, Nepal has also ratified all other treaties, relevant to the Right to Food, such as the International Covenant in Civil and Political Rights, the Convention for the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women or the Convention on the Rights of the Child and adopted the FAO Voluntary Guidelines to support the progressive realization of the right to adequate food in the context of national food security.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kamaiya System of Bonded Labour in Nepal
    Nepal Case Study on Bonded Labour Final1 1 THE KAMAIYA SYSTEM OF BONDED LABOUR IN NEPAL INTRODUCTION The origin of the kamaiya system of bonded labour can be traced back to a kind of forced labour system that existed during the rule of the Lichhabi dynasty between 100 and 880 AD (Karki 2001:65). The system was re-enforced later during the reign of King Jayasthiti Malla of Kathmandu (1380–1395 AD), the person who legitimated the caste system in Nepali society (BLLF 1989:17; Bista 1991:38-39), when labourers used to be forcibly engaged in work relating to trade with Tibet and other neighbouring countries. In the 18th and 19th centuries, the Gorkhali and Rana rulers introduced and institutionalised new forms of forced labour systems such as Jhara,1 Hulak2, Beth3 and Begar4 (Regmi, 1972 reprint 1999:102, cited in Karki, 2001). The later two forms, which centred on agricultural works, soon evolved into such labour relationships where the workers became tied to the landlords being mortgaged in the same manner as land and other property. These workers overtimes became permanently bonded to the masters. The kamaiya system was first noticed by anthropologists in the 1960s (Robertson and Mishra, 1997), but it came to wider public attention only after the change of polity in 1990 due in major part to the work of a few non-government organisations. The 1990s can be credited as the decade of the freedom movement of kamaiyas. Full-scale involvement of NGOs, national as well as local, with some level of support by some political parties, in launching education classes for kamaiyas and organising them into their groups culminated in a kind of national movement in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.2 District Profile Kailali English Final 23 March
    "Environmnet-friendly Development, Maximum Use of Resources and Good Governance Overall Economic, Social and Human Development; Kailali's Pridefulness" Periodic District Development Plan (Fiscal Year 2072/073 − 2076/077) First Part DISTRICT PROFILE (Translated Version) District Development Committee Kailali March 2015 Document : Periodic District Development Plan of Kailali (F/Y 2072/73 - 2076/77) Technical Assistance : USAID/ Sajhedari Bikaas Consultant : Support for Development Initiatives Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. (SDIC), Kathmandu Phone: 01-4421159, Email : [email protected] , Web: www.sdicnepal.org Date March, 2015 Periodic District Development Plan (F/Y 2072/073 - 2076/77) Part One: District Profile Abbreviation Acronyms Full Form FY Fiscal year IFO Area Forest Office SHP Sub Health Post S.L.C. School Leaving Certificate APCCS Agriculture Production Collection Centres | CBS Central Bureau of Statistics VDC Village Development Committee SCIO Small Cottage Industry Office DADO District Agriculture Development Office DVO District Veterinary Office DSDC District Sports Development Committee DM Dhangadhi Municipality PSO Primary Health Post Mun Municipality FCHV Female Community Health Volunteer M Meter MM Milimeter MT Metric Ton TM Tikapur Municipality C Centigrade Rs Rupee H Hectare HPO Health Post HCT HIV/AIDS counselling and Testing i Periodic District Development Plan (F/Y 2072/073 - 2076/77) Part One: District Profile Table of Contents Abbreviation ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IEE Updated Report of Lamki
    Updated Initial Environmental Examination Project number: 35173-013 July 2015 NEP: Third Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project —Lamki (Kailali District) Prepared by ITECO Nepal (P) Ltd., SILT Consultants (P) Ltd., and Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd. for the Government of Nepal and the Asian Development Bank. This revised initial environmental examination report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Government of Nepal Ministry of Water Supply and Sanitation Department of Water Supply and Sewerage Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project (STWSSSP) Project Management Office (PMO) Panipokhari, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Enhance Functionality in Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project (STWSSSP) Updated Initial Environmental Examination Report (IEE) for Lamki Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project Kailali District Kathmandu, July 2015 Submitted by: Joint Venture in Between ITECO Nepal (P) Ltd. SILT Consultants (P) Ltd. Unique Engineering P. O. Box 2147 P.O. Box 2724 Consultancy (P) Ltd. Ratopul, Gaushala, Kathmandu, Nepal Min Bhawan, Kathmandu,
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Assessment Report2020 Kailali 03Aug2020.Pdf
    NEPAL 72-hour assessment VERSION_1 Contents may change based on updated information 03 August 2020 Flood in Kailali| July 2020 Priority Populations for Food Assistance Total 21,900 Priority 3 5,400 Priority 2 8,100 Priority 1 8,400 Children Heavy rainfall on 28-29 July 2020 caused flooding in Priority Palika Households Population PLW under 5 Sudurpaschim Province Terai, affecting mainly Kailali 1 3 1,400 8,400 800 200 district. The disaster damaged assets, including houses, water and sanitation infrastructure, food stocks and 2 2 1,400 8,100 800 200 agricultural production, which negatively impacted food security in the district. An estimated 21,900 people’s food 3 3 1,100 5,400 500 100 security is significantly affected as a result of the flooding, Total 8 3,900 21,900 2,100 500 of which 8,400 people, or 1,400 households, are considered to be in most need of assistance. Note: The numbers presented in the Map and Table are estimated based on the However, the satellite image received in 2 August 2020 flood inundation at the peak, received from Sentiel-1 SAR on 29 July and overlaying the pre-crisis vulnerability indicators of these Palikas. Priority 1 and 2 from Sentiniel-1 SAR (see Inundation Area 2) showed that are inneed of immediate assistanceduethe severity of situation. water level is receding in most of the flooded areas. This, WFP has started field assessment in the affected areas to verify and understand together with field assessment results, can influence the the impactand estimate the need as part of 72-hour approach methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Ltzt Ul/Alsf Uxgtf -K|Ltzt S}N Fnl Wgl;+
    1 2 lhNnfx?sf] ul/aLsf] b/, ul/aLsf] ljifdtf / ul/aLsf] uxgtf @)^* lhNnf uf=lj=;=sf gfd ul/aLsf b/ ul/aLsf ljifdtf ul/aLsf uxgtf -k|ltzt_ -k|ltzt_ -k|ltzt_ s}nfnL wgl;+xk'/ 41.39(10.44) 11.01(3.85) 4.14(1.74) s}nfnL gf/fo0fk'/ 26.28(8.63) 5.79(2.5) 1.89(0.96) s}nfnL ky/}of 32.55(9.31) 7.61(2.9) 2.59(1.17) s}nfnL hfgsLgu/ 29.43(9.04) 6.76(2.8) 2.27(1.13) s}nfnL d'g'jf 25.23(8.84) 5.59(2.53) 1.83(0.98) s}nfnL b'uf{}nL 26.96(8.57) 6.07(2.54) 2.02(1) s}nfnL ;'u/vfn 57.06(10.37) 16.48(4.68) 6.45(2.3) s}nfnL sf]6f t'n;Lk'/, bf]bf]w/f 35.69(9.88) 8.75(3.37) 3.09(1.44) s}nfnL r'xf 32.17(9.59) 7.58(3.14) 2.6(1.31) s}nfnL alnof, k|tfkk'/ 29.94(9.08) 7.15(2.91) 2.48(1.21) s}nfnL k08f}g, df]xGofn 57.85(10.92) 16.3(4.88) 6.25(2.37) s}nfnL d;'l/of, /fdlzv/emfnf 44.08(10.61) 11.82(4.15) 4.43(1.91) s}nfnL ;fF8]kfgL 45.32(10.67) 12.16(4.22) 4.55(1.95) s}nfnL b/v, kxndfgk'/ 34.31(9.38) 8.38(3.25) 2.94(1.4) s}nfnL x;'lnof, a;f}6L, /tgk'/ 39.51(10.33) 9.97(3.69) 3.57(1.61) s}nfnL kj]/f 32.34(9.48) 7.73(3.09) 2.66(1.29) s}nfnL nfnaf]lem 46.4(10.84) 12.36(4.2) 4.6(1.91) s}nfnL v}nf8 44.93(10.66) 11.89(4.1) 4.4(1.86) s}nfnL ehgL 36.04(9.52) 9.05(3.22) 3.26(1.37) s}nfnL af}lgof, hf]lzk'/ 30.97(9.22) 7.23(2.91) 2.45(1.18) s}nfnL yfkfk'/ 26.8(9.25) 5.84(2.66) 1.88(1.02) s}nfnL pbf;Lk'/, pdf 39.97(11.38) 9.85(3.99) 3.46(1.71) s}nfnL u8l/of 35.94(10.14) 8.45(3.3) 2.86(1.35) s}nfnL km'njf/L 30.05(8.79) 7.14(2.79) 2.47(1.15) s}nfnL uf]bfjf/L, ;xhk'/ 48.83(10.71) 13.62(4.47) 5.23(2.12) s}nfnL >Lk'/ 30.22(9.19) 7.25(2.94) 2.52(1.21) s}nfnL dfnfv]tL 22.61(7.48) 5.24(2.28) 1.79(0.92) s}nfnL v}/fnf 62.06(10.5) 18.2(5.13) 7.15(2.59) s}nfnL lgufnL 45.8(11.33) 11.93(4.25) 4.36(1.9) s}nfnL rf}dfnf 34.31(10.37) 8.29(3.42) 2.89(1.44) s}nfnL a]nfb]ljk'/ 38.03(10.48) 9.27(3.58) 3.25(1.52) s}nfnL u]6f 18.27(6.11) 4.11(1.76) 1.37(0.69) s}nfnL wgu9L gu/kflnsf 22.78(6.29) 5.81(2.1) 2.12(0.91) s}nfnL l6sfk'/ gu/kflnsf 33.85(8.43) 8.92(3.03) 3.34(1.35) gf]6 M sf]i7s -_ leq /x]sf] c+sn] ;DalGwt ;"rssf] e|dfz+ -k|ltzt_ nfO{ hgfpF5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
    Chapter 3 Project Evaluation and Recommendations 3-1 Project Effect It is appropriate to implement the Project under Japan's Grant Aid Assistance, because the Project will have the following effects: (1) Direct Effects 1) Improvement of Educational Environment By replacing deteriorated classrooms, which are danger in structure, with rainwater leakage, and/or insufficient natural lighting and ventilation, with new ones of better quality, the Project will contribute to improving the education environment, which will be effective for improving internal efficiency. Furthermore, provision of toilets and water-supply facilities will greatly encourage the attendance of female teachers and students. Present(※) After Project Completion Usable classrooms in Target Districts 19,177 classrooms 21,707 classrooms Number of Students accommodated in the 709,410 students 835,820 students usable classrooms ※ Including the classrooms to be constructed under BPEP-II by July 2004 2) Improvement of Teacher Training Environment By constructing exclusive facilities for Resource Centres, the Project will contribute to activating teacher training and information-sharing, which will lead to improved quality of education. (2) Indirect Effects 1) Enhancement of Community Participation to Education Community participation in overall primary school management activities will be enhanced through participation in this construction project and by receiving guidance on various educational matters from the government. 91 3-2 Recommendations For the effective implementation of the project, it is recommended that HMG of Nepal take the following actions: 1) Coordination with other donors As and when necessary for the effective implementation of the Project, the DOE should ensure effective coordination with the CIP donors in terms of the CIP components including the allocation of target districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Site-Specific Environment Management Plan
    GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF ENERGY, WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION (DWRI) RANI JAMARA KULARIYA IRRIGATION PROJECT (RJKIP) PHASE II Site-Specific Environment Management Plan Of River Training Works along Pathraiya River Type of work: Command Area Protection 9/4/2020 Rani Jamara Kulariya Irrigation Project (RJKIP) Tikapur, Kailali | P a g e Abbreviations BoQ Bill of Quantity CAP Command Area Protection CF Community Forest CFUG Community Forest User Group CoI Corridor of Impact DO Dissolve Oxygen DoWRI Department of Water Resources and Irrigation EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EPA Environment Protection Act EPR Environment Protection Regulation FGD Focus Group Discussion GoN Government of Nepal HH House Hold IEE Initial Environmental Examination KII Key Informant Interview KM Kilo Meter M Meter OSH Occupational Safety and Health PM2.5 Particulate Matter (size <2.5 microne) PPE Personal Protective Equipment PAH Project Affected Household RJKIP Rani Jamara Kulariya Irrigation Project RJKIS Rani Jamara Kulariya Irrigation System RM Rural Municipality RPF Result Planning Framework SSEMP Site Specific Environment Management Plan STD Sexually Transmitted Disease TSS Total Suspended Solid WB The World Bank i | P a g e Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 2. Objectives: ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]