DOCSLIB.ORG

Anne Kox JAPES 1..216

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anne Kox JAPES 1..216 Physics as a Calling, Science for Society Physics as a Calling, Science for Society Studies in Honour of A.J. Kox Edited by Ad Maas and Henriëtte Schatz LEIDEN Publications The publication of this book has been made possible by grants from the Institute for Theoretical Physics of the University of Amsterdam, Stichting Pieter Zeeman- fonds, Stichting Physica and the Einstein Papers Project at the California Institute of Technology. Leiden University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. Cover illustration: Albert Einstein and Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, photographed by Paul Ehrenfest in front of his home in Leiden in 1921. Source: Museum Boerhaave, Leiden. Cover design: Sander Pinkse Boekproducties Layout: JAPES, Amsterdam ISBN 978 90 8728 198 4 e-ISBN 978 94 0060 156 7 (pdf) e-ISBN 978 94 0060 157 4 (e-pub) NUR 680 © A. Maas, H. Schatz / Leiden University Press, 2013 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Contents Preface 7 Kareljan Schoutens Introduction 9 1 Astronomers and the making of modern physics 15 Frans van Lunteren 2 The drag coefficient from Fresnel to Laue 47 Michel Janssen 3 The origins of the Korteweg-De Vries equation: Collaboration between Korteweg and De Vries 61 Bastiaan Willink 4 A note on Einstein’s Scratch Notebook of 1910-1913 81 Diana K. Buchwald, Jürgen Renn and Robert Schlögl 5 The reception of relativity in the Netherlands 89 Jip van Besouw and Jeroen van Dongen 6 ‘Our stomachs can’t wait that long’: E.C. van Leersum and the rise of applied nutrition research in the Netherlands 111 Pim Huijnen 7 Ernst Laqueur (1880-1947): The career of an outsider 131 Peter Jan Knegtmans 8 Much ado about cold: Leiden’s resistance to the International Temperature Scale of 1927 141 Dirk van Delft 9 The magnet and the cold: Wander de Haas and the burden of being Kamerlingh Onnes’ successor 163 Ad Maas 5 10. ‘The search for a black cat in an unlit room, where there is no cat at all’: Investigation by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences into dowsing and earth rays 179 Jan Guichelaar 11 Amsterdam memories 199 Roger H. Stuewer About the authors 207 Index 211 Colour insert: Material heritage of Dutch science between 1850 and 1950: Ten highlights from Museum Boerhaave 6 Preface The occasion of Anne Kox reaching retirement age has inspired his colleagues and friends to put together this collection of studies devoted to the history of the natural sciences between 1850 and 1950, with a special focus on twentieth century physics research in the Netherlands. You will enjoy the keen insights articulated by some of the best experts on the history of modern science. Among the con- tributors to this volume are several of the students that Anne coached during their PhD studies. As a long-term colleague of Anne Kox at the Institute for Theoretical Physics of the University of Amsterdam (ITFA), I have greatly appreciated his scholarly and authoritative knowledge of the history of science, often learning from him some of the subtleties in historical accounts that those who are less well informed tend to oversimplify or ignore. The close connections that Anne has maintained with the Stichting Pieter Zeeman-Fonds have been highly valuable for the educational programmes of our university’s Faculty of Science. Through his courses, aimed at students in both the Science and the Humanities Faculties, Anne has enlightened generations of students with an interest in the history of science. In my present role as Dean of the Faculty of Science, I wish to thank Anne for his many contributions and for his inspiring presence in our midst. Kareljan Schoutens Professor of Theoretical Physics Dean of the Faculty of Science University of Amsterdam 7 Introduction Over the course of his career, Anne Kox has developed a wide range of profes- sional interests, in the Netherlands as well as abroad. It is no surprise that the varied circle of colleagues that Anne Kox has gathered around himself over the years reflects his own varied professional interests. This is definitely the case for the group of close colleagues who have contributed to this volume. As a result, Albert Einstein and Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, the two towering figures in the his- tory of theoretical physics to whom Kox has devoted a large part of his career, inevitably play a prominent role in several chapters in this volume. Indeed, they are both among the main protagonists in Michel Janssen’s chapter about Fresnel’s ether drag coefficient. Fresnel introduced the ether drag coeffi- cient to explain why the earth’s motion through the luminiferous ether, the me- dium that was thought to carry light waves, is not detected in experiments on the refraction of light. Attempts to provide a dynamical model for Fresnel’s ether drag failed until Lorentz finally created such a model in the context of his microscopic elaboration of Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory. Eventually, Laue derived the Fresnel drag coefficient from Einstein’s special theory of relativity. He showed that it is a direct consequence of the relativity of simultaneity. With this purely kinematical account, the Fresnel drag coefficient became detached from any dy- namical model rooted in the physics of light in transparent media. In the study by Van Besouw and Van Dongen about the perception of the theory of relativity in the Netherlands, Einstein and Lorentz are also prominent. The authors identify several reasons why relativity generated a primarily positive re- sponse in the Netherlands. One of these was the great reputation and influence of Lorentz and other Leiden physicists, who were instrumental both in the gen- esis and in the popularization of the theory of general relativity. Another reason was Einstein’s internationalist and pacifistic attitude, which resonated well with Holland’s self-image as a country with an internationalist outlook and as a pro- moter of international peace. Van Besouw and Van Dongen show, most of all, that social or personal interests that lay outside the field of physics often deter- mined the perception of relativity among the theory’s proponents as well as its modest number of adversaries. The theory of relativity even played an important role in debates concerning the epistemological foundations of the Dutch educa- tional system. In their elegant chapter, Diana Buchwald, Jürgen Renn, and Robert Schlögl discuss the scratch notebook Einstein used between 1910 and 1913, during the 9 fascinating period in which he laid the foundations for his theory of general rela- tivity. The notebook offers a revealing insight into the daily life of Albert Einstein in those years. He appears to have been a far cry from a scholar working single- mindedly and in isolation on his magnum opus. On the contrary, he engaged in experimentation and in physical chemistry, travelled, visited fellow scientists, and apparently developed his cutting edge ideas in a lively interaction with his scien- tific contacts. And what does the scratch notebook reveal about the unknown fate of Einstein’s daughter Lieserl? Albert Einstein and Hendrik Antoon Lorentz shared a similar attitude towards their scientific activities. First and foremost they worked as ‘fundamental’ physi- cists, for whom nothing else counted than to unravel the secrets of nature. In- deed, their research was their ruling passion. As a colleague stated, Lorentz con- ducted his research ‘as a bird sings his song’;1 it was ‘the great fulfilment of his life’.2 Yet, Lorentz also fulfilled his social duties and applied his skills in mathe- matics and physics for the well-being of his countrymen. The clearest example of this commitment is his extensive work on the calculations for the Afsluitdijk, the dike that transformed the Zuiderzee into a lake.3 Einstein was even more involved in practical matters, as historians in recent years have increasingly realized. Even though he was not always successful, throughout his life he engaged enthusiasti- cally in experimentation, engineering and inventing.4 For these great scientists physics was their calling, but they realized that their intellectual skills should also serve society on a more practical level. The contributions in this volume, however diverse in topic and approach, cover more or less the same period, roughly between 1850 and 1950, and focus for the most part on Dutch science. This is the period in which the research university, where research is a full-fledged activity side by side with education, became an established phenomenon. In the first half of the twentieth century the fundamen- tal sciences and their practitioners had acquired an almost inviolable position, both within the universities and in society at large. Yet, the contributions in this volume show that even during this heyday of ivory tower-science, scientists could not escape the outside world – even if they wished to do so. A case in point is presented in Dirk van Delft’s chapter about the remarkably stubborn resistance of Kamerlingh Onnes and his successor Willem Keesom to the International Temperature Scale of 1927. This convention replaced the obso- lete temperature scale introduced in 1887, and it ended the use of different tem- perature scales, a practice that everybody agreed was undesirable. The Leiden ob- jections were apparently of a purely technical nature. Yet, as Van Delft points out, underneath the factual discussions was a principled difference between national calibration institutions, which increasingly kept an eye on industrial interests, and scientific institutions like the Leiden physics laboratory, where only fundamental scientific standards counted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Fluids Unmix. Discoveries by the School of Van Der Waals and Kamerlingh Onnes, ,  ---
    4671 Sengers Voorwerkb 23-09-2002 09:17 Pagina I How fluids unmix 4671 Sengers Voorwerkb 23-09-2002 09:17 Pagina II History of Science and Scholarship in the Netherlands, volume The series History of Science and Scholarship in the Netherlands presents studies on a variety of subjects in the history of science, scholarship and academic insti- tutions in the Netherlands. Titles in this series . Rienk Vermij, The Calvinist Copernicans. The reception of the new astronomy in the Dutch Republic, -. , --- . Gerhard Wiesenfeldt, Leerer Raum in Minervas Haus. Experimentelle Natur- lehre an der Universität Leiden, -. , --- . Rina Knoeff, Herman Boerhaave (-). Calvinist chemist and physician. , --- . Johanna Levelt Sengers, How fluids unmix. Discoveries by the School of Van der Waals and Kamerlingh Onnes, , --- Editorial Board K. van Berkel, University of Groningen W.Th.M. Frijhoff, Free University of Amsterdam A. van Helden, Utrecht University W.E. Krul, University of Groningen A. de Swaan, Amsterdam School of Sociological Research R.P.W. Visser, Utrecht University 4671 Sengers Voorwerkb 23-09-2002 09:17 Pagina III How fluids unmix Discoveries by the School of Van derWaals and Kamerlingh Onnes Johanna Levelt Sengers , Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam 4671 Sengers Voorwerkb 23-09-2002 09:17 Pagina IV © Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Edita , P.O. BOX , Amsterdam, the Netherlands [email protected], www.knaw.nl/edita --- The paper in this publication meets the requirements of « -norm () for permanence This study was undertaken with the support of the Koninklijke Hollandsche Maatschappij der Wetenschappen (‘Royal Holland Society of Sciences and Humanities’) as part of its 250th anniver- sary celebrations in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Stern Annalen 22.9.11
    September 22, 2011 Otto Stern (1888-1969): The founding father of experimental atomic physics J. Peter Toennies,1 Horst Schmidt-Böcking,2 Bretislav Friedrich,3 Julian C.A. Lower2 1Max-Planck-Institut für Dynamik und Selbstorganisation Bunsenstrasse 10, 37073 Göttingen 2Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe Universität Frankfurt Max-von-Laue-Strasse 1, 60438 Frankfurt 3Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Faradayweg 4-6, 14195 Berlin Keywords History of Science, Atomic Physics, Quantum Physics, Stern- Gerlach experiment, molecular beams, space quantization, magnetic dipole moments of nucleons, diffraction of matter waves, Nobel Prizes, University of Zurich, University of Frankfurt, University of Rostock, University of Hamburg, Carnegie Institute. We review the work and life of Otto Stern who developed the molecular beam technique and with its aid laid the foundations of experimental atomic physics. Among the key results of his research are: the experimental determination of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of molecular velocities (1920), experimental demonstration of space quantization of angular momentum (1922), diffraction of matter waves comprised of atoms and molecules by crystals (1931) and the determination of the magnetic dipole moments of the proton and deuteron (1933). 1 Introduction Short lists of the pioneers of quantum mechanics featured in textbooks and historical accounts alike typically include the names of Max Planck, Albert Einstein, Arnold Sommerfeld, Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, Paul Dirac, Max Born, and Wolfgang Pauli on the theory side, and of Konrad Röntgen, Ernest Rutherford, Max von Laue, Arthur Compton, and James Franck on the experimental side. However, the records in the Archive of the Nobel Foundation as well as scientific correspondence, oral-history accounts and scientometric evidence suggest that at least one more name should be added to the list: that of the “experimenting theorist” Otto Stern.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research
    Bretislav Friedrich · Dieter Hoffmann Jürgen Renn · Florian Schmaltz · Martin Wolf Editors One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences Bretislav Friedrich • Dieter Hoffmann Jürgen Renn • Florian Schmaltz Martin Wolf Editors One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences Editors Bretislav Friedrich Florian Schmaltz Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Max Planck Institute for the History of Society Science Berlin Berlin Germany Germany Dieter Hoffmann Martin Wolf Max Planck Institute for the History of Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Science Society Berlin Berlin Germany Germany Jürgen Renn Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Berlin Germany ISBN 978-3-319-51663-9 ISBN 978-3-319-51664-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51664-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017941064 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncom- mercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0710.5227V1 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 27 Oct 2007
    THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN KORTEWEG AND DE VRIES | AN ENQUIRY INTO PERSONALITIES BASTIAAN WILLINK Abstract. In the course of the years the names of Korteweg and de Vries have come to be closely associated. The equation which is named after them plays a fundamental role in the theory of non- linear partial differential equations. What are the origins of the doc- toral dissertation of De Vries and of the Korteweg-de Vries paper? Bastiaan Willink, a distant relative of both of these mathemati- cians, has sought to answer these questions. This article is based on a lecture delivered by the author at the symposium dedicated to Korteweg and de Vries at University of Amsterdam in September 2003. Since its rediscovery by Zabusky and Kruskal in 1965, an extensive literature has come to exist on the Korteweg-de Vries equation (KdV equation) which de- scribes the behavior of long-wavelength waves in shallow water. It is not the aim of this paper to add to the discussions concerning the contents of this equation or regarding the genesis of the theory of non-linear partial differential equations. Hereto Eduard de Jager has recently added two papers [1] Earlier Robert Pego and others questioned the originality of the work by De Vries and Korteweg, especially in relation to the work by Boussinesq [2]. De Jager has however made it plausible that although the KdV equation can be deduced from an equation of Boussinesq [Joseph Valentin Boussinesq (1842-1929)] by means of a relatively simple substi- tution, nonetheless Korteweg and De Vries arrived at new and important results through treading a different path than Boussinesq.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Telecardiology
    Chapter 2 Telecardiology Among the clinical disciplines, the widest use of telemedicine in the twentieth century has been in cardiology. The main reason for this is the necessity of urgent diagnosis of acute pathology of the cardiovascular system, especially with the involvement of high-level experts. At the other hand, telemetry of electrocardiosignals (ECS or ECG) for the remote interpretation and analysis was most consistent with the technical capabilities of electrical engineering in the last century. 2.1. Early Stage of Telecardiology (Contributing co-authors O. Stadnyk, M. Karlinska) Most researchers consider March 22, 1905 as the birthday of telemedicine. On this day, in The Netherlands, Wilhelm Einthoven, professor of physiology at Leiden University, and Professor Johannes Bosscha, Director of the Delft University of Technology, transmitted a regular electrocardiogram Fig. 2.1. Wilhelm Einthoven and Johannes Bosscha and phonocardiogrammes via an protected telephone cable at a distance of about 1500 meters from the University Hospital to the physiological laboratory at W. Einthoven’s house (Fig. 2.1) (Einthoven, 1906). Einthoven is considered one of the main founders of electrocardiography. For this invention he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1924. The basic technological component of Einthoven's electrocardiograph was the so-called string galvanometer. It was a very accurate and qualitative, but rather cumbersome device mounted in his home laboratory (Fig. 2.2 - 2.3). As technology developed, the ECG registrations of patients with various diseases became of greater interest, but to move the string galvanometer to the clinic was an almost impossible task. Then Professor Johannes Bosscha suggested using a remote broadcasting, which enabled to examine patients in the clinic with a device that was physically located at a distance of 1.5 kilometres (Barold, 2003; Einthoven, 1906; Miami Fire Department’s First 57 Paramedic Program 1967; Taylor et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gibbs Paradox: Early History and Solutions
    entropy Article The Gibbs Paradox: Early History and Solutions Olivier Darrigol UMR SPHere, CNRS, Université Denis Diderot, 75013 Paris, France; [email protected] Received: 9 April 2018; Accepted: 28 May 2018; Published: 6 June 2018 Abstract: This article is a detailed history of the Gibbs paradox, with philosophical morals. It purports to explain the origins of the paradox, to describe and criticize solutions of the paradox from the early times to the present, to use the history of statistical mechanics as a reservoir of ideas for clarifying foundations and removing prejudices, and to relate the paradox to broad misunderstandings of the nature of physical theory. Keywords: Gibbs paradox; mixing; entropy; irreversibility; thermochemistry 1. Introduction The history of thermodynamics has three famous “paradoxes”: Josiah Willard Gibbs’s mixing paradox of 1876, Josef Loschmidt reversibility paradox of the same year, and Ernst Zermelo’s recurrence paradox of 1896. The second and third revealed contradictions between the law of entropy increase and the properties of the underlying molecular dynamics. They prompted Ludwig Boltzmann to deepen the statistical understanding of thermodynamic irreversibility. The Gibbs paradox—first called a paradox by Pierre Duhem in 1892—denounced a violation of the continuity principle: the mixing entropy of two gases (to be defined in a moment) has the same finite value no matter how small the difference between the two gases, even though common sense requires the mixing entropy to vanish for identical gases (you do not really mix two identical substances). Although this paradox originally belonged to purely macroscopic thermodynamics, Gibbs perceived kinetic-molecular implications and James Clerk Maxwell promptly followed him in this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • James, Steinhauser, Hoffmann, Friedrich One Hundred Years at The
    James, Steinhauser, Hoffmann, Friedrich One Hundred Years at the Intersection of Chemistry and Physics Published under the auspices of the Board of Directors of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society: Hans-Joachim Freund Gerard Meijer Matthias Scheffler Robert Schlögl Martin Wolf Jeremiah James · Thomas Steinhauser · Dieter Hoffmann · Bretislav Friedrich One Hundred Years at the Intersection of Chemistry and Physics The Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society 1911–2011 De Gruyter An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Aut ho rs: Dr. Jeremiah James Prof. Dr. Dieter Hoffmann Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Institute for the Max Planck Society History of Science Faradayweg 4–6 Boltzmannstr. 22 14195 Berlin 14195 Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Thomas Steinhauser Prof. Dr. Bretislav Friedrich Fritz Haber Institute of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society Max Planck Society Faradayweg 4–6 Faradayweg 4–6 14195 Berlin 14195 Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Cover images: Front cover: Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, 1913. From left to right, “factory” building, main building, director’s villa, known today as Haber Villa. Back cover: Campus of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, 2011. The Institute’s his- toric buildings, contiguous with the “Röntgenbau” on their right, house the Departments of Physical Chemistry and Molecular Physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Història De La Física Quàntica a Través Dels Experiments
    Història de la Física Quàntica a través dels experiments semestre de tardor, curs 2017-2018 Apunts provisionals Enric Pérez Canals Apunts en procés de redacció. S’agrairan comentaris, crítiques, suggeriments, etc. Índex 1 La Física de l’electró 1 1.1 Introducció a la Història de la Física Moderna . 1 1.1.1 Algunes precaucions historiogràfiques . 3 1.2 L’experiment de J.J. Thomson . 4 1.2.1 Física del segle XX . 4 1.2.2 Èter i electromagnetisme de Maxwell . 5 1.2.3 Raigs catòdics . 7 1.2.3.1 Cathode Rays, de J.J. Thomson . 7 1.2.4 Descobriments i Positivisme . 10 1.2.4.1 L’experiment de Thomson i l’atomisme . 11 1.2.5 Anàlisi . 11 1.3 L’experiment de Millikan . 12 1.3.1 De corpuscles a electrons ......................... 12 1.3.2 L’atomisme químic . 13 1.3.2.1 Mesures (relatives) de la massa. Pesos atòmics . 13 1.3.2.2 Mesures (relatives) de la càrrega. Electròlisi . 15 1.3.3 Les mesures absolutes . 16 1.3.4 L’experiment de la gota d’oli . 17 1.3.5 Anàlisi . 19 Apèndixs 20 1.A L’aparició de la quantització . 20 1.B L’aïllament de l’electró (i de l’àtom) . 20 1.C Metàfores . 21 Bibliografia . 21 2 Els quanta de llum 25 2.1 La llei de radiació de Planck . 25 2.1.1 Calor radiant: la radiació del Sol . 25 2.1.2 La llei de radiació . 28 2.1.2.1 La llei de Planck i els elements d’energia de Planck, 1900 .
    [Show full text]
  • Putting the Quantum to Work: Otto Sackur's Pioneering Exploits in The
    Putting the quantum to work: Otto Sackur’s pioneering exploits in the quantum theory of gases Massimiliano Badino and Bretislav Friedrich FHI Abstract: In the wake of the First Solvay Conference (1911), many leading physicists had begun embracing the quantum hypothesis as a key to solving outstanding problems in the theory of matter. The quantum approach proved successful in tackling the solid state, resulting in the nearly definitive theories of Debye (1912) and of Born & von Karman (1912-13). However, the application of the old quantum theory to gases was hindered by serious difficulties, which were due to a lack of a straightforward way of reconciling the frequency-dependent quantum hypothesis with the aperiodic behavior of gas molecules. A breakthrough came from unlikely quarters. Otto Sackur (1880-1914) had been trained as a physical chemist and had almost no experience in the research fields traditionally associated with quantum theory (heat radiation, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics). However, in 1911, he discovered an expression for the absolute entropy of a monoatomic gas. A Dutch high-school student, Hugo Martin Tetrode, reached the same result at about the same time independently. The Sackur-Tetrode equation rendered entropy as an extensive variable (in contrast to the classical expression, cf. the Gibbs paradox) and expressed the thermodynamically undetermined constant in terms of molecular parameters and Boltzmann’s and Planck’s constants. This result was of great heuristic value because it suggested the possibility of deriving the thermodynamic variables of a gas quantum mechanically. At the same time, the Sackur-Tetrode equation offered a conventient means to evaluate the parameters of molecular gases, thus promising a grand unification of quantum theory, thermodynamics, and physical chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stern-Gerlach Experiment Revisited
    The Stern-Gerlach Experiment Revisited Horst Schmidt-Böcking∗1, Lothar Schmidt1, Hans Jürgen Lüdde2, Wolfgang Trageser1, Alan Templeton3, and Tilman Sauer4 1Institute for Nuclear Physics, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. 2Institute for Theoretical Physics, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany. 3Oakland, CA, USA. 4Institute of Mathematics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Version of September 30, 2016 Abstract The Stern-Gerlach-Experiment (SGE) performed in 1922 is a seminal benchmark experiment of quantum physics providing evidence for several fundamental properties of quantum systems. Based on the knowledge of today we illustrate the different benchmark results of the SGE for the development of modern quantum physics and chemistry. The SGE provided the first direct experimental evidence for angu- lar momentum quantization in the quantum world and therefore also for the existence of directional quantization of all angular momenta in the process of measurement. Furthermore, it measured for the first time a ground state property of an atom, it produced for the first time a fully “spin-polarized” atomic beam, and it also revealed the electron spin, even though this was not realized at the time. The SGE was the first fully suc- cessful molecular beam experiment where the kinematics of particles can be determined with high momentum-resolution by beam measurements in vacuum. This technique provided a kind of new kinematic microscope with which inner atomic or nuclear properties could be investigated. Historical facts of the original SGE are described together with early attempts by Einstein, Ehrenfest, Heisenberg, and others to reveal the physical processes creating directional quantization in the SGE. Heisen- berg’s and Einstein’s proposals of an improved multi-stage SGE are pre- sented.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Approach to Stimulate Mathematics Research in the Netherlands
    A new approach to stimulate mathematics research in The Netherlands Lex Zandee Head Mathematics, NWO BCAMath meeting 12 january 2011 Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Mathematics in the Netherlands 16 million inhab. 420 1st year math students Free University (VU) University of Amsterdam (UvA) Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI) University of Utrecht (UU) University of Leiden (UL) Radboud University Nijmegen (RU) University of Groningen (RUG) Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) Delft University of Technology (TUD) University of Twente (UT) NWO NWO funds thousands of researchers at universities and institutes and steers the course of Dutch science by means of subsidies and research programmes. The organisation: - 10 divisions: e.g. chemical sciences, physics etc. - 7 institutes: e.g. CWI (Amsterdam), NIOZ etc. - Office situated in The Hague - Staff: 350 employees - Annual expenditure: 700 M€ Annual expenditure mathematics and computer science: - Mathematics: 9 M€ - CWI: 12 M€ - Computer science: 13 M€ Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Short history of the Dutch mathematical landscape I - 16th century: Dutch mathematical landscape took shape; Gemma Frisius, - Leiden University 1575 - 17th century: the Golden Age - Simon Stevin - Snellius 1st math. professor Leiden, 1601 - Christiaan Huygens - Van Ceulen, π - after the Golden Age: Dutch mathematics went into decline Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Short history of the Dutch mathematical landscape II - end of 19th century: end of stagnation: Diederik Korteweg Gustav de Vries nonlinear PDE - 20th century: second golden age Luitzen Brouwer è Johannes Burgers è Burgerscentrum Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Short history of the Dutch mathematical landscape III Founding fathers of field of nonlinear systems in the Netherlands: - current Dutch mathematical school in PDEs by: - Wiktor Eckhaus (pattern formation) - Bert Peletier (non-linear PDE’s) - current Dutch math.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Mountain La Montaña Del Movimiento
    Christoph Schiller MOTION MOUNTAIN La Montaña del Movimiento LA AVENTURA DE LA FÍSICA - VOLUMEN IV EL CUANTO DEL CAMBIO Christoph Schiller Traducción de Jerónimo Hurtado Pérez Motion Mountain La Montaña del Movimiento La Aventura de la Física Volumen IV El Cuanto del Cambio Edicion 25.40, disponible libre como pdf en www.motionmountain.net Editio vicesima quinta. Proprietas scriptoris © Chrestophori Schiller secundo anno Olympiadis trigesimae. Omnia proprietatis iura reservantur et vindicantur. Imitatio prohibita sine auctoris permissione. Non licet pecuniam expetere pro aliqua, quae partem horum verborum continet; liber pro omnibus semper gratuitus erat et manet. Twenty-fifth edition. Copyright © 2012 by Christoph Schiller, the second year of the 30th Olympiad. This pdf file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No DerivativeWorks 3.0 Germany Licence, whose full text can be found on thewebsite creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/de, with the additional restriction that reproduction, distribution and use, in whole or in part, in any product or service, be it commercial or not, is not allowed without the written consent of the copyright owner.The pdf file was and remains free for everybody to read, store and print for personal use, and to distribute electronically, but only in unmodified form and at no charge. - 1 - To Britta, Esther and Justus Aaron τῷ ἐµοὶ δαὶµονι Fortalecer a las personas, aclarar las cosas - 2 - Christoph Schiller Mountain Moton La Montaña del Movimiento La aventura de la Física PREFACIO Primum movere, deinde docere.** Antigüedad Primero mover, luego enseñar Este libro está escrito para cualquiera que tenga curiosidad sobre la naturaleza y el movimiento.
    [Show full text]