Cultural Access and Participation - from Indicators to Policies for Democracy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Access and Participation - from Indicators to Policies for Democracy CultureWatchEurope 2012 Conference Cultural Access and Participation - from Indicators to Policies for Democracy Helsinki, Finland 30 June 2012 Conference Reader Cultural Access and Participation - from Indicators to Policies for Democracy CultureWatchEurope 2012 Conference Helsinki (Finland), 30 June 2012 Editor’s Note This reader is a digest of the discussions that took place during the conference “Cultural Access and Participation - from Indicators to Policies for Democracy” in Helsinki on 30 June 2012. It contains various presentations, papers and a general résumé of the issues and broad conclusions of the conference. The one-day reflection process in Helsinki, generously hosted by the Ministry of Culture of Finland, was the fourth in a series of CultureWatchEurope1 gatherings.The event was devoted to looking at the role of culture and partincipation in cultural life as a key factor in enhancing ‘democratic governance’ which is one of the Council of Euorpe’s main priorities. The specific aim was to reflect on the body of research available on access to and participation in culture and propose practical tools for democratic cultural policy making in times when society is exposed to many challenges. These relate to increasing mobility and to shifts in values and practices induced by social, demographic, economic and technological developments. Cultural policy makers need not only to understand these developments, but also to actively shape them. Cultural participation fosters the exercise of active citizenship and promotes cohesion. We are indeed dealing with key questions of democracy, when asking about participation in culture. We shall carefully watch the implementation of the right of everyone to take part in cultural life and invest in our adequate understanding of respective national contexts as well as in identifying trends. The reflection process on this issue is far from being exhausted. The present reader is an important input to the Council of Europe Conference of Ministers of Culture on “Governance of Culture – Promoting Access to Culture” (Moscow, 15-16 April 2012) as well as to future works of the Directorate General on Democracy. We thank all those who contributed to the research and reflection process around the Helsinki Conference and invite readers to continue developing, together with the Council of Europe, the political agenda on democratic access and participation in culture. Claudia Luciani, Democratic Governance Director, Council of Europe, December 2012 1 CultureWatchEurope is a multi-stakeholder platform initiated by the Council of Europe to spot, monitor and evaluate trends relating to culture, heritage and media across Europe. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Report on the Conference by Tommi Laitio: Counting What Counts .............................................. 4 Message by Conference participants ..................................................................................................... 4 About the report ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Age of uncertainty .................................................................................................................................. 4 From anecdotes to evidence .................................................................................................................. 5 Evidence for change .............................................................................................................................. 6 Understanding participation ................................................................................................................... 7 Indicators for monitoring pre-defined objectives .................................................................................... 9 Indicators for change.............................................................................................................................. 9 Helsinki participation research process ................................................................................................ 10 Concluding notes ................................................................................................................................. 11 II. Participants’ reflections .................................................................................................................... 13 A. Culture for sustainable democracy in the digital age ....................................................................... 13 Stojan Pelko: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 13 Joost Smiers: Digitisation and cultural democracy, an (as yet) unfulfilled promise .......................... 15 Jan Malinowski: Culture is not about “culture” .................................................................................. 31 B. From statistics to indicators - could we arrive at a European cultural participation index? .............. 35 Elena Di Federico: Measuring cultural participation: a state of the art ............................................. 35 Susanne Keuchel: Empirical Studies "Cultural Participation" - Projects in Germany and Europe ... 44 Vladimír Bína: a Proposal for Indicators on Cultural Participation and Access to Culture ................ 60 Andreas Wiesand: Let's start a "Helsinki participation research process" now! ............................... 76 Andrew Ormston: ‘Ha! hold my Brain; be still my beating Heart.’ - How to measure the culture we love ................................................................................................................................................... 78 Xabier Landabidea Urresti: Beyond statistics and indicators for access, participation and experience in cultural leisure............................................................................................................................... 82 C. From indicators to cultural policies .................................................................................................. 83 Colin Mercer: From Data to Wisdom: building the knowledge base for cultural policy ..................... 83 Jukka Liedes: Policy development through user-oriented indicators and the challenges and pitfalls of evidence-based policy making ..................................................................................................... 95 Péter Inkei: What indicators policy makers really use, and the added value of a proposal for a European Cultural Participation Index ............................................................................................ 104 III. Conference programme ................................................................................................................. 110 IV. Participants’ Curriculum Vitas ...................................................................................................... 112 V. - Appendices .................................................................................................................................... 130 Appendix 1 - Recommendation 1990 (2012) The right of everyone to take part in cultural life – Parliamentary Assembly .................................................................................................................... 130 Appendix 2 – Council of Europe Internet Governace Strategy 2012-2015 ........................................ 137 CultureWatchEurope Event 2012 Reader 3 I. Report on the Conference by Tommi Laitio: Counting What Counts Message by Conference participants Both economic austerity and demands for more transparent policy call for the cultural field to up its game. Arts and culture needs a solid body of evidence to make a stronger case on culture’s fundamental role in open-mindedness, equality, prosperity and participatory democracy. European countries are in very uneven stages in developing this argumentation. The 2013 Council of Europe Conference of Ministers of Culture (Moscow, April) should give a push for stronger European collaboration by adopting the suggested Helsinki Participation Research Process (HPRP). The HPRP would develop a biannual, European cultural participation index. As the Helsinki meeting of CultureWatchEurope demonstrated, there is also a vast body of data that could already be transformed into analysis and insight. As a reaction to the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly’s recent recommendation on "The right of everyone to take part in cultural life", we – the participants of the CultureWatchEurope event in Helsinki – wished to send five clear messages as input to the Ministers of Culture conference taking place in 2013 in Moscow. 1. Suggest to start a Helsinki Participation Research Process (HPRP)... 2. …which develops a set of European cultural indicators and a system for biannual surveys... 3. … that will be able to measure societal and economic impact of culture beyond mere input, employment and attendance … 4. … and help decision makers, cultural professionals and citizens better understand the essential role of culture as a creator of "empathy for difference"…. 5. … and in order to better understand cultural participation and, especially, non-participation. About the report This report2 reflects the debate of the CultureWatchEurope meeting held on 30 June 2012 at the House of Estates (Helsinki, Finland). The presentations given and a full list of attendees can be found attached. The meeting was called upon by the
Recommended publications
  • Resituating Culture
    Resituating culture edited by Gavan Titley Directorate of Youth and Sport Council of Europe Publishing This publication is an edited collection of articles from the resituating culture seminar organised in the framework of the partnership agreement on youth research between the Directorate of Youth and Sport of the Council of Europe and the Directorate-General for Education and Culture, Directorate D, Unit 1, Youth, of the European Commission. The opinions expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not neces- sarily reflect the official position of the Council of Europe. All correspondence relating to this publication or the reproduction or translation of all or part of the document should be addressed to: Directorate of Youth and Sport European Youth Centre Council of Europe 30, rue Pierre de Coubertin F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex Tel: +33 (0) 3 88 41 23 00 Fax: +33 (0) 3 88 41 27 77 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.coe.int/youth All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc.) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior permission in writing from the Publishing Division, Communication and Research Directorate. Cover: Graphic Design Publicis Koufra Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex ISBN 92-871-5396-5 © Council of Europe, April 2004 Reprinted May 2005 Printed at the Council of Europe Contents Pags List of contributors ........................................................................................... 5 Resituating culture: an introduction Gavan Titley ...................................................................................................... 9 Part l. Connexity and self 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years on Culture, Politics and Cultural Policy
    Cinquante ans après Culture, politique et politiques culturelles Fifty Years On Culture, Politics And Cultural Policy Sommaire Table of Contents Sommaire Table of Contents Ouverture Opening Session Frédéric MITTERRAND Frédéric MITTERRAND Maryvonne DE SAINT PULGENT Maryvonne DE SAINT PULGENT Élie BARNAVI Élie BARNAVI Le modèle français en question Examining the French Model Les missions de 1959, vues de 2009 A 2009 perspective on the aims of 1959 Antoine COMPAGNON ............................................... Antoine COMPAGNON .......................................... 5 Redéfinir une culture véritablement cultivée Redefining a genuinely cultured culture Élie BARNAVI Élie BARNAVI Réponse à Antoine Compagnon et à Élie Barnavi Response to Antoine Compagnon and Élie Barnavi Jack LANG Jack LANG CHAPITRE 1 SESSION 1 La construction de l’Europe suppose-t-elle Does the Construction of Europe une politique culturelle commune ? Presuppose a Common Cultural Policy? Les politiques culturelles dans le temps Cultural policies in European time and space. et l’espace européens. Modèles et évolutions Models and evolutions Pierre-Michel MENGER ............................................ Pierre-Michel MENGER ......................................... 10 TABLE RONDE ROUND TABLE Présidée par Jack LANG Chaired by Jack LANG Modérateur : Emmanuel LAURENTIN Facilitator: Emmanuel LAURENTIN Intervenants : Liz FORGAN, Jan-Hendrik OLBERTZ, Panel members: Liz FORGAN, Jan-Hendrik OLBERTZ, Jacques RIGAUD, Ivaylo ZNEPOLSKI Jacques RIGAUD, Ivaylo ZNEPOLSKI La politique
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture | the AHRC Cultural Value
    Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska 2 Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska THE AHRC CULTURAL VALUE PROJECT CONTENTS Foreword 3 4. The engaged citizen: civic agency 58 & civic engagement Executive summary 6 Preconditions for political engagement 59 Civic space and civic engagement: three case studies 61 Part 1 Introduction Creative challenge: cultural industries, digging 63 and climate change 1. Rethinking the terms of the cultural 12 Culture, conflict and post-conflict: 66 value debate a double-edged sword? The Cultural Value Project 12 Culture and art: a brief intellectual history 14 5. Communities, Regeneration and Space 71 Cultural policy and the many lives of cultural value 16 Place, identity and public art 71 Beyond dichotomies: the view from 19 Urban regeneration 74 Cultural Value Project awards Creative places, creative quarters 77 Prioritising experience and methodological diversity 21 Community arts 81 Coda: arts, culture and rural communities 83 2. Cross-cutting themes 25 Modes of cultural engagement 25 6. Economy: impact, innovation and ecology 86 Arts and culture in an unequal society 29 The economic benefits of what? 87 Digital transformations 34 Ways of counting 89 Wellbeing and capabilities 37 Agglomeration and attractiveness 91 The innovation economy 92 Part 2 Components of Cultural Value Ecologies of culture 95 3. The reflective individual 42 7. Health, ageing and wellbeing 100 Cultural engagement and the self 43 Therapeutic, clinical and environmental 101 Case study: arts, culture and the criminal 47 interventions justice system Community-based arts and health 104 Cultural engagement and the other 49 Longer-term health benefits and subjective 106 Case study: professional and informal carers 51 wellbeing Culture and international influence 54 Ageing and dementia 108 Two cultures? 110 8.
    [Show full text]
  • EMERGENT FORMS of LIFE: Anthropologies of Late Or Postmodernities
    Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 1999. 28:455–78 Copyright © 1999 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved EMERGENT FORMS OF LIFE: Anthropologies of Late or Postmodernities Michael M.J. Fischer Science, Technology and Society Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words: social theory and ethnography, science institutions, film and cyberspace, reconstruction after social trauma n Abstract Anthropologies of late modernity (also called postmodernity, postindustrial society, knowledge society, or information society) provide a number of stimulating challenges for all levels of social, cultural, and psycho- logical theory, as well as for ethnographic and other genres of anthropological writing. Three key overlapping arenas of attention are the centrality of science and technology; decolonization, postcolonialism, and the reconstruction of so- cieties after social trauma; and the role of the new electronic and visual media. The most important challenges of contemporary ethnographic practice include more than merely (a) the techniques of multilocale or multisited ethnography for strategically accessing different points in broadly spread processes, (b) the techniques of multivocal or multiaudience-addressed texts for mapping and ac- knowledging with greater precision the situatedness of knowledge, (c) the re- working of traditional notions of comparative work for a world that is increas- ingly aware of difference, and (d) acknowledging that anthropological repre- sentations are interventions within a stream of representations, mediations, and unequally inflected discourses competing for hegemonic control. Of equal im- by HARVARD UNIVERSITY on 09/21/10. For personal use only. portance are the challenges of juxtaposing, complementing, or supplementing other genres of writing, working with historians, literary theorists, media critics, novelists, investigative or in-depth journalists, writers of insider accounts (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction the Creative and Cultural Professions in the EU 2020 Strategy
    European Economic and Social Committee The creative and cultural professions in the EU 2020 Strategy Short bio of the speakers & moderators and some contributions Conference at the EESC on 14 October 2013 Introduction Hilde van Laere, Consultative Commission on Industrial Change, EESC Hilde van Laere has been a delegate of the European Economic and Social Committee (Belgian representation) since December 2010. She works for the Consultative Commission on Industrial Change (CCMI). She previously was management adviser for the Deboeck group of FEP-FEE (European publishers). Rachid Madrane, Minister of Culture and of Social Services for the COCOF Rachid Madrane is a member of the Belgian French-speaking socialist party, currently Minister of the COCOF (French community commission) in charge of Social Services, Professional Training, Culture, and External Relations, as well as Minister of Brussels Region in charge of Urbanism and Public Hygiene. Julek Jurowicz, Managing Director of SMartEu Julek Jurowicz graduated as electrical engineer (1972) and commercial engineer (1973) at Université Libre de Bruxelles. From 1990 he specialised in the field of international taxes and worked as a consultant. In 1998 he co-founded SMart a.s.b.l. and has since been the managing director of the SMart group. Denis Stokkink, Chairman of Pour la Solidarité European Think Tank Denis Stokkink is an economist. His professional experience is rich and varied and includes working for the Belgian Minister of Employment. In 2002, he became President of the European Think Tank Pour la Solidarité, which is an organisation dedicated to promoting solidarity and diversity-based policy in Europe. Denis Stokkink also chairs a number organisations in Europe and is a lecturer at several institutions in Belgium and France.
    [Show full text]
  • Minister of Counterculture
    26 Guardian Weekly December 23 2005-January 5 2006 Culture Gilberto Gil is a musical legend - and now a senior Brazilian politician. He tz Minister of counterculture Gilberto Gil wears a sober suit and tie these days, and his dreadlocks are greying at the temples. But you soon remember that, as well as the serving culture minister of Brazil, you are in the presenceof one of the biggest l,atin American musicians of the 60s and 70s when you ask him about his intellectual influences and he cites Timothy l,eary. "Oh, yeah!" Gil says happily, rocking back in his chair at the Royal SocietyoftheArts in London. "Forexam- ple, all those guys at Silicon Valley - they're all coming basically from the psychedelic culture, you know? The brain-expanding processesof the crystal had a lot to do with the internet." Much as it may be currently de rigueur for journalists to ask politicians whether or not they have smoked marijuana, the question does not seem worth the effort. Gil's constant references to the hippy counterculture are not simplythe nostalgia of a 63-year-old with more than 4O albums to his name. For several years now, largely under the rest of the world's radar, the Braeilian government has been building a counterculture ofits own. The battlefield has been intellectual property - the ownership ofideas - and the revolution has touched everything, from internet file- sharing to GM crops to HIV medication. Phar- maceutical companies selling patented Aids drugs, for example, were informed that Brazil would simply ignore their claims to ownership and copy their products more cheaply if they didn't offer deep discounts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Mapping
    Cultural Planning in The City of L’viv: Cultural Mapping 1 Centre for Cultural Management European Cultural Foundation (ECF) P. O. Box 5620 Jan van Goyenkade 5 Lviv 79067 1075 HN Amsterdam Ukraine The Netherlands www.kultura.org.ua www.eurocult.org Copyright 2008 Centre for Cultural Management 2 Contents Section I I. Forward 4 II. Acknowledgements 7 Section II III. Executive Summary 8 Section III IV. Introduction 10 V.The L’viv Context 11 VI. Information Collection 11 VII. Participants 13 VIII. The Cultural Map of L’viv 14 IX. Key Issues 19 X. Recommendations/conclusions 20 Section IV XI. Appendices 21 3 Cultural Planning in The City of L’viv: Cultural Mapping I. Foreward L’viv has great cultural potential to work within Europe. Philipp Dietachmair When beginning an initiative such as this one, the first dilemma is identifying a place to start. Usually one chooses an arbitrary commencement point that makes sense within the context. Our starting point was based in our individual experience, the interests of our funder, the interests of our City officials and the current reality of L’viv’s cultural community. These constitute a lot of variables, and we can rest assured that all of the designers of the project did not bring to the task the same set of assumptions around these variables or the same set of motivations. In the hope that transparency can support more effective communication with you, the reader, we would like to take a moment to explore and explain a few issues that frame what we have done and might impact your appreciation of this report, of our process and of our recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Glocal Forum Presentation
    GLOCAL FORUM PRESENTATION UN HABITAT EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON STRATEGIES FOR CREATING URBAN YOUTH EMPLOYMENT : Solution for Urban Youth in Africa I - Glocal Forum experience on youth and governance 1. Glocal Forum The Glocal Forum is a Non-Governmental Organization created in 2001 working for a new balance between global and local forces by emphasizing the central role of cities in the world. Our vision, glocalization, is an innovative strategy focusing on global issues by empowering local communities. It is a reform of globalization that encourages global powers to have a broader respect for local powers and cultural diversity. Led by its president, Ambassador Uri Savir, the Glocal Forum promotes peacebuilding and development activities through city-to-city relationships, youth empowerment and information communication technology. The Glocal Forum believes that cities have a central role in international relations and that mayors are poised to become the new diplomats of our world. City leaders have the advantage of mobilizing the good will, energy and expertise of their civil societies to contribute to peaceful dialogue and cultural exchange. The organization supports city-to-city networks by connecting them to the resources of the private and public sector. The Glocal Forum utilizes this global coalition of international organizations and private sector companies to harness resources and address local needs. A primary goal of city-to-city cooperation is to build an environment in which divisions caused by conflict and hatred can be bridged with harmony and coexistence. The Glocal Forum uses the city- to-city model as a fresh approach to brokering peace in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Cultural Governance – Where Culture Belongs in Relation to Governance and Representation
    1. Cultural Governance – Where Culture Belongs in Relation to Governance and Representation The Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission Social Justice Report of 2012, on page 86, proposes a framework for effective, legitimate and culturally relevant Indigenous governance that has three key components: • community governance • organisational governance • the governance of governments. Sadly, in the post – ATSIC period, issues relating to Indigenous Governance and Indigenous representation have been relegated to second tier issues and the role of Aboriginal culture [as distinct from ‘the arts’] has been relegated to a third tier issue. In the post – ATSIC period we have witnessed a range of initiatives relating to the Governance of Government, most notably the COAG arrangements, Close the Gap and specific initiatives such as the COAG Remote Service Delivery arrangements. Across the same period we have seen the development and enhancement of a range of initiatives relating to organisational governance, most notably the role of ORIC and also the proliferation of PBCs. But across that same period, there has been almost no development in regards to issues of community governance, except in as much as there are aspects of organisational governance and the governance of governments which do relate to the community. Indeed, Governments oftentimes demonstrate through their policy and funding actions that they believe that there are only two dimensions to Governance, and they totally ignore the reality that community governance has traditions which date back over 60, 000 years. The way that these traditions play out in terms of Governance and Representation in the Kimberley can be seen through the KALACC logo, as attached, and as described in the Indigenous Governance Toolkit: KALACC represents themselves through a simple diagram of concentric circles.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Mapping Findings
    Creative Together: A Cultural Plan for the City of Vaughan Cultural Mapping Findings Cultural mapping is a systematic approach to defining and recording a community’s cultural assets. In Ontario, municipalities having made commitments to building cultural mapping systems include Oakville, Hamilton, Vaughan and Durham Region. The City of Toronto has partnered with the Martin Prosperity Institute to establish Placing Creativity a group that brings together individuals from academic, government and community organizations to advance thinking and practice in cultural mapping. In August 2009, the Province of Ontario launched the Creative Community Prosperity Fund, a $9 million funding commitment with cultural mapping and municipal cultural planning forming key funding priorities. Cultural mapping as it is understood and practiced in Ontario has two dimensions – one tangible (or quantitative) the other intangible (or qualitative). 1. Resource Mapping – identifying and recording tangible cultural resources usually making use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tools and platforms; and, 2. Community Identity Mapping – exploring a community’s ‘intangible cultural resources’ – the unique stories and traditions that define a community’s identity and sense of place. 1. Cultural Resource Mapping Vaughan has established itself as a leading municipality nationally in entrenching a formal commitment to cultural mapping in the Official Plan. “Cultural mapping is a systematic approach to identifying and recording cultural resources. It can identify and record tangible cultural resources using GIS tools, but can also use community identity mapping to explore intangible cultural resources, such as unique histories, values, traditions and stories that combine to define a community’s identity and sense of place. Through multimedia enriched web-based maps, cultural mapping enhances access to information on local cultural resources for residents and visitors and provides a platform for marketing and promoting these resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Labor, and Socio-Economic Power in a Tunisian Export Processing Zone Claire Therese Oueslati-Porter University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2011 The aM ghreb Maquiladora: Gender, Labor, and Socio-Economic Power in a Tunisian Export Processing Zone Claire Therese Oueslati-Porter University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Oueslati-Porter, Claire Therese, "The aM ghreb Maquiladora: Gender, Labor, and Socio-Economic Power in a Tunisian Export Processing Zone" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3737 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Maghreb Maquiladora: Gender, Labor, and Socio-Economic Power in a Tunisian Export Processing Zone by Claire Oueslati-Porter A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Kevin Yelvington, Ph.D. Chair: Stephen Thornton, Ph.D. Mark Amen, Ph.D. Maria Crummett, Ph.D. Susan Greenbaum, Ph.D. Rebecca Zarger, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 28, 2011 Keywords: globalization, culture, women, factory, stratification Copyright © 2011 Claire Oueslati-Porter Dedication I thank my parents, Suzanne and Terry, for instilling in me a belief in social justice, and a curiosity about the world.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural Trip to Tunisia Tuesday 3 to Friday 13 March 2020 with Khun Bilaibhan Sampatisiri Honorary Advisor to the Siam Society Council
    CY-2019-067 A SIAM SOCIETY STUDY TRIP A Cultural Trip to Tunisia Tuesday 3 to Friday 13 March 2020 With Khun Bilaibhan Sampatisiri Honorary Advisor to the Siam Society Council The Republic of Tunisia is a country in North Africa, on the Mediterranean Sea. It is the northernmost country in Africa and at almost 165,000 square kilometres in area, the smallest country in the Maghreb region of North Africa. As of 2019, its population is estimated just under 11.7 million. Its name is derived from its capital city, Tunis, located on the country’s northeast coast. Northern Tunisia has a typical Mediterranean climate, with hot, dry summers and mild, wet winter. The mountains of the north-west occasionally get snow. Annual rainfall ranges from 1,000 mm in the north down to 150 mm in the south, although some Saharan area go for years without rain. From October to beginning of December is ideal for touring. At the beginning of recorded history, Tunisia was inhabited by Berber tribes. Its coast was settled by Phoenicians starting as early as the 10th century BC. The city of Carthage was founded in the 9th century BC by Phoenician and Cypriot settlers. After the series of wars with Greek city-states of Sicily in the 5th century BC, Carthage rose to power and eventually became the dominant civilisation in the Western Mediterranean. A Carthaginian invasion of Italy led by Hannibal during the Second Punic War, one of a series of wars with Rome, nearly crippled the rise of Roman power. After the Battle in 149 BC, Carthage was conquered by Rome, the region became one of the main granaries of Rome and was fully Latinised.
    [Show full text]