Glocal Forum Presentation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Introduction the Creative and Cultural Professions in the EU 2020 Strategy
European Economic and Social Committee The creative and cultural professions in the EU 2020 Strategy Short bio of the speakers & moderators and some contributions Conference at the EESC on 14 October 2013 Introduction Hilde van Laere, Consultative Commission on Industrial Change, EESC Hilde van Laere has been a delegate of the European Economic and Social Committee (Belgian representation) since December 2010. She works for the Consultative Commission on Industrial Change (CCMI). She previously was management adviser for the Deboeck group of FEP-FEE (European publishers). Rachid Madrane, Minister of Culture and of Social Services for the COCOF Rachid Madrane is a member of the Belgian French-speaking socialist party, currently Minister of the COCOF (French community commission) in charge of Social Services, Professional Training, Culture, and External Relations, as well as Minister of Brussels Region in charge of Urbanism and Public Hygiene. Julek Jurowicz, Managing Director of SMartEu Julek Jurowicz graduated as electrical engineer (1972) and commercial engineer (1973) at Université Libre de Bruxelles. From 1990 he specialised in the field of international taxes and worked as a consultant. In 1998 he co-founded SMart a.s.b.l. and has since been the managing director of the SMart group. Denis Stokkink, Chairman of Pour la Solidarité European Think Tank Denis Stokkink is an economist. His professional experience is rich and varied and includes working for the Belgian Minister of Employment. In 2002, he became President of the European Think Tank Pour la Solidarité, which is an organisation dedicated to promoting solidarity and diversity-based policy in Europe. Denis Stokkink also chairs a number organisations in Europe and is a lecturer at several institutions in Belgium and France. -
3.3 Release Notes
Red Hat Software Collections 3 3.3 Release Notes Release Notes for Red Hat Software Collections 3.3 Last Updated: 2020-03-17 Red Hat Software Collections 3 3.3 Release Notes Release Notes for Red Hat Software Collections 3.3 Lenka Špačková Red Hat Customer Content Services [email protected] Jaromír Hradílek Red Hat Customer Content Services [email protected] Eliška Slobodová Red Hat Customer Content Services Legal Notice Copyright © 2019-2020 Red Hat, Inc. This document is licensed by Red Hat under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. If you distribute this document, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat, Inc. and provide a link to the original. If the document is modified, all Red Hat trademarks must be removed. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Shadowman logo, the Red Hat logo, JBoss, OpenShift, Fedora, the Infinity logo, and RHCE are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux ® is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries. Java ® is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates. XFS ® is a trademark of Silicon Graphics International Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. MySQL ® is a registered trademark of MySQL AB in the United States, the European Union and other countries. -
The WAF Build System
The WAF build system The WAF build system Sebastian Jeltsch Electronic Vision(s) Kirchhoff Institute for Physics Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg 31. August 2010 Sebastian Jeltsch The WAF build system 31. August 2010 1 / 19 The WAF build system Introduction WorkBuildflow Sebastian Jeltsch The WAF build system 31. August 2010 2 / 19 make = major pain What we expect from our build system: flexibility integration of existing workflows access to well established libraries extensibility power usability The WAF build system Introduction WorkBuildflow For us: low-level code many many layers Sebastian Jeltsch The WAF build system 31. August 2010 3 / 19 What we expect from our build system: flexibility integration of existing workflows access to well established libraries extensibility power usability The WAF build system Introduction WorkBuildflow For us: low-level code many many layers make = major pain Sebastian Jeltsch The WAF build system 31. August 2010 3 / 19 The WAF build system Introduction WorkBuildflow For us: low-level code many many layers make = major pain What we expect from our build system: flexibility integration of existing workflows access to well established libraries extensibility power usability Sebastian Jeltsch The WAF build system 31. August 2010 3 / 19 The WAF build system Introduction Autotools (GNU Build System) GNU Build System + few dependencies on user side (shell scripts) developer autoscan ed + generates standard make files + widely used configure.ac Makefile.am – platform dependent (bash aclocal autoheader automake scripts) aclocal.m4 config.h.in Makefile.in – autoconf-configure is slow autoconf Often: tconfigure >> tmake. – another scripting language configure Makefile make user Sebastian Jeltsch The WAF build system 31. -
Empirical Comparison of Scons and GNU Make
Großer Beleg Empirical Comparison of SCons and GNU Make Ludwig Hähne August 21, 2008 Technical University Dresden Department of Computer Science Institute for System Architecture Chair for Operating Systems Professor: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Hermann Härtig Tutor: Dipl.-Inf. Norman Feske Dipl.-Inf. Christian Helmuth Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich diese Arbeit selbstständig erstellt und keine anderen als die angegebenen Hilfsmittel benutzt habe. Dresden, den 26. Juni 2008 Ludwig Hähne Abstract Build systems are an integral part of every software developer’s tool kit. Next to the well-known Make build system, numerous alternative solutions emerged during the last decade. Even though the new systems introduced superior concepts like content signa- tures and promise to provide better build accuracy, Make is still the de facto standard. This paper examines GNU Make and SCons as representatives of two conceptually distinct approaches to conduct software builds. General build-system concepts and their respective realizations are discussed. The performance and scalability are empirically evaluated by confronting the two competitors with comparable real and synthetic build tasks. V Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Background 3 2.1 Design Goals . .3 2.1.1 Convenience . .3 2.1.2 Correctness . .3 2.1.3 Performance . .3 2.1.4 Scalability . .4 2.2 Software Rebuilding . .4 2.2.1 Dependency analysis . .4 2.2.1.1 File signatures . .4 2.2.1.2 Fine grained dependencies . .5 2.2.1.3 Dependency declaration . .5 2.2.1.4 Dependency types . .5 2.2.2 Build infrastructure . .6 2.2.3 Command scheduling . .6 2.3 Build System Features . -
Brackets Third Party Page (
Brackets Third Party Page (http://www.adobe.com/go/thirdparty) "Cowboy" Ben Alman Copyright © 2010-2012 "Cowboy" Ben Alman Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. The Android Open Source Project Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. -
List of Participants to the Third Session of the World Urban Forum
HSP HSP/WUF/3/INF/9 Distr.: General 23 June 2006 English only Third session Vancouver, 19-23 June 2006 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS TO THE THIRD SESSION OF THE WORLD URBAN FORUM 1 1. GOVERNMENT Afghanistan Mr. Abdul AHAD Dr. Quiamudin JALAL ZADAH H.E. Mohammad Yousuf PASHTUN Project Manager Program Manager Minister of Urban Development Ministry of Urban Development Angikar Bangladesh Foundation AFGHANISTAN Kabul, AFGHANISTAN Dhaka, AFGHANISTAN Eng. Said Osman SADAT Mr. Abdul Malek SEDIQI Mr. Mohammad Naiem STANAZAI Project Officer AFGHANISTAN AFGHANISTAN Ministry of Urban Development Kabul, AFGHANISTAN Mohammad Musa ZMARAY USMAN Mayor AFGHANISTAN Albania Mrs. Doris ANDONI Director Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Telecommunication Tirana, ALBANIA Angola Sr. Antonio GAMEIRO Diekumpuna JOSE Lic. Adérito MOHAMED Adviser of Minister Minister Adviser of Minister Government of Angola ANGOLA Government of Angola Luanda, ANGOLA Luanda, ANGOLA Mr. Eliseu NUNULO Mr. Francisco PEDRO Mr. Adriano SILVA First Secretary ANGOLA ANGOLA Angolan Embassy Ottawa, ANGOLA Mr. Manuel ZANGUI National Director Angola Government Luanda, ANGOLA Antigua and Barbuda Hon. Hilson Nathaniel BAPTISTE Minister Ministry of Housing, Culture & Social Transformation St. John`s, ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 1 Argentina Gustavo AINCHIL Mr. Luis Alberto BONTEMPO Gustavo Eduardo DURAN BORELLI ARGENTINA Under-secretary of Housing and Urban Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA Development Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA Ms. Lydia Mabel MARTINEZ DE JIMENEZ Prof. Eduardo PASSALACQUA Ms. Natalia Jimena SAA Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA Session Leader at Networking Event in Profesional De La Dirección Nacional De Vancouver Políticas Habitacionales Independent Consultant on Local Ministerio De Planificación Federal, Governance Hired by Idrc Inversión Pública Y Servicios Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA Ciudad Debuenosaires, ARGENTINA Mrs. -
Product End User License Agreement
END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT If you have another valid, signed agreement with Licensor or a Licensor authorized reseller which applies to the specific Licensor Software, Software Services, Maintenance or Consulting Services you are downloading, accessing or otherwise receiving, that other agreement shall control; otherwise by using, downloading, installing, copying, or accessing Licensor Software, Software Services, Maintenance or Consulting Services, or by clicking on "I accept" on or adjacent to the screen where these Master Terms may be displayed, you hereby agree to be bound by and accept these Master Terms. These Master Terms shall also apply to any Maintenance or Consulting Services you later acquire from Licensor relating to the Software or Software Services. You may place orders under these Master Terms by submitting separate Order Form(s). Capitalized terms used in these Master Terms and not otherwise defined, are defined at https://terms.tibco.com/posts/845635-definitions. 1. License Models, License Grant, Rights and Restrictions. Licensor provides Software on a Perpetual, or Term basis, embedded and delivered as part of Equipment, as Software Services and on a Subscription basis. The Supplemental Terms, include, but are not limited to, the license grant, rights and restrictions for each of the foregoing (including for evaluation purposes) which are located at https://terms.tibco.com. The availability of Software in one or more of the foregoing license models is at Licensor's sole discretion. Additional license requirements and notices, if any, if not included at https://terms.tibco.com, shall be contained in the Documentation that is delivered with the applicable Software. -
October 2007 1 CONCEPT PAPER on CITY DIPLOMACY
CONCEPT PAPER ON CITY DIPLOMACY By Alexandra Sizoo VNG International Project Manager Secretariat UCLG City Diplomacy Committee 1. Introduction 1.1. Why this paper? Over the past decades, there is a clear tendency showing that maintaining international relations is no longer an exclusive ground for national governments. Diplomacy as a means to defend certain interests in the international community is also used by local governments. Local governments world wide have gained experience in establishing international relations by developing foreign policies, cooperating with local governments abroad, setting up lobby networks to make their work visible in the international community, etc. Furthermore, local governments feel the responsibility and see the advantages of contributing to democratic development elsewhere. Therefore, local governments participate in international cooperation projects and exchange experiences with their colleagues abroad. This kind of reasoning comes from two sides, since more and more, local governments that face a situation of internal conflict or war ask their counterparts to support them in dealing with the accompanying problems. As government tiers closest to the citizens, local governments feel responsible for creating and maintaining a safe and peaceful environment for their citizens. In 2005, the world organization of Local Governments, United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG), established the Committee on City Diplomacy. The committee objective is to define the role of local governments in promoting social cohesion, conflict prevention, conflict resolution and post-conflict reconstruction, in a word ‘peace building’. This rather narrow meaning of the concept City Diplomacy, is used as a working definition within the organisation. This paper is written to describe and to explain what City Diplomacy means according to the working definition of the committee (2). -
Best Practices: Use of Web Application Firewalls
OWASP Papers Program Best Practice: Use of Web Application Firewalls Best Practices: Use of Web Application Firewalls Version 1.0.5, March 2008, English translation 25. May 2008 Author: OWASP German Chapter with collaboration from: Maximilian Dermann Mirko Dziadzka Boris Hemkemeier Achim Hoffmann Alexander Meisel Matthias Rohr Thomas Schreiber OWASP Papers Program Best Practice: Use of Web Application Firewalls Abstract Web applications of all kinds, whether online shops or partner portals, have in recent years increasingly become the target of hacker attacks. The attackers are using methods which are specifically aimed at exploiting potential weak spots in the web application software itself – and this is why they are not detected, or are not detected with sufficient accuracy, by traditional IT security systems such as network firewalls or IDS/IPS systems. OWASP develops tools and best practices to support developers, project managers and security testers in the development and operation of secure web applications. Additional protection against attacks, in particular for already productive web applications, is offered by what is still a emerging category of IT security systems, known as Web Application Firewalls (hereinafter referred to simply as WAF), often also called Web Application Shields or Web Application Security Filters. One of the criteria for meeting the security standard of the credit card industry currently in force (PCI DSS - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard v.1.1) for example, is either a regular source code review or the use of a WAF. The document is aimed primarily at technical decision-makers, especially those responsible for operations and security as well as application owners (specialist department, technical application managers) evaluating the use of a WAF. -
Cyberoam WAF User Guide Version 10 Document Version 1.0 – 10.6.6.042 - 24/11/2017
Cyberoam WAF User Guide Version 10 Document version 1.0 – 10.6.6.042 - 24/11/2017 Cyberoam Web Application Firewall Guide Important Notice Cyberoam Technologies Pvt. Ltd. has supplied this Information believing it to be accurate and reliable at the time of printing, but is presented without warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. Users must take full responsibility for their application of any products. Cyberoam Technologies Pvt. Ltd. assumes no responsibility for any errors that may appear in this document. Cyberoam Technologies Pvt. Ltd. reserves the right, without notice to make changes in product design or specifications. Information is subject to change without notice. USER’S LICENSE Use of this product and document is subject to acceptance of the terms and conditions of Cyberoam End User License Agreement (EULA) and Warranty Policy for Cyberoam UTM Appliances. You will find the copy of the EULA at http://www.cyberoam.com/documents/EULA.html and the Warranty Policy for Cyberoam UTM Appliances at http://kb.cyberoam.com. RESTRICTED RIGHTS Copyright 1999 - 2015 Cyberoam Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved. Cyberoam, Cyberoam logo are trademark of Cyberoam Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Corporate Headquarters Cyberoam Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 901, Silicon Tower, Off. C.G. Road, Ahmedabad – 380006, INDIA Phone: +91-79-66065606 Fax: +91-79-26407640 Web site: www.cyberoam.com Page 2 of 56 Cyberoam Web Application Firewall Guide Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................... -
Ycop Links: the First 50 Issues
Educational Quality Out of School Youth Learning Improvement Program 3 Earning YCoP Links: The First 50 Issues A Youth Community of Practice (YCoP) Publication YCoP Links: The First 50 Issues A Youth Community of Practice (YCoP) Publication Produced as part of the USAID Youth Community of Practice (YCoP) by Education Development Center, Inc. under EQUIP3 Leader Agreement No. GDG-A-00-03-00006-00 Compiled by Suzanne Kratzig and Ann Hershkowitz Production and Interactive Indexing by Nieshoff Design (nieshoffdesign.com) Photo Credits: Page 45 by Anjum Pervaiz, All Other Photos by Karl Grobl July 2009 EQUIP3 Consortium: Education Development Center, Inc. Academy for Educational Development Catholic Relief Services International Council on National Youth Policy International Youth Foundation National Youth Employment Coalition National Youth Leadership Council Opportunities Industrialization Centers International Partners of the Americas Plan International Childreach Sesame Workshop Street Kids International World Learning TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................. ii INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................ iii HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT ............................................................................................................................... iv LINKS LISTINGS -
Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 10 June 2013
United Nations E/2013/32 (Part II) Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 10 June 2013 Original: English Substantive session of 2013 Geneva, 1-26 July 2013 Item 12 of the provisional agenda* Non-governmental organizations Report of the Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations on its 2013 resumed session (New York, 20-29 May and 7 June 2013) Summary At its 2013 resumed session, held from 20 to 29 May and on 7 June 2013, the Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations had before it 426 applications for consultative status, including applications deferred from earlier sessions. Of the non-governmental organizations submitting those 426 applications, the Committee recommended 161 for consultative status, deferred 219 for further consideration at its regular session in 2014, closed consideration without prejudice of 45 applications that had failed to respond to queries over two consecutive sessions and took note of one non-governmental organization that had withdrawn its application. The Committee also had before it three requests for reclassification of consultative status; it recommended granting one of those requests. The Committee took note of one request for a change of name and deferred another. It also had before it 135 quadrennial reports, of which it took note of 112. The Committee heard 20 representatives of the 43 non-governmental organizations that attended the session. The present report contains five draft decisions on matters calling for action by the Economic and Social Council. By draft decision I, the Council would: (a) Grant special consultative status to 161 non-governmental organizations; (b) Reclassify the consultative status of one non-governmental organization from special to general consultative status; * E/2013/100.