DOCSLIB.ORG

2 O 1 1 International Data Protection Conference 2O112 O 1 1 Header TABLE of CONTENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2 O 1 1 International Data Protection Conference 2O112 O 1 1 Header TABLE of CONTENTS International Data Protection Conference 2O112 O 1 1 International Data Protection Conference 2O112 O 1 1 header TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 4 Róbert Répássy: Welcome speech at the International Data Protection Conference in Budapest 6 Françoise Le Bail: Keynote speech: Reform of the data protection rules 10 Aurora Mejía: Keynote speech of the Budapest Conference 12 Peter Hustinx: Where we are now and where we are heading - current and future dilemma’s of privacy protection 16 Janni Christoffersen: Cloud computing – a challenge to data protection? 20 Urszula Góral: Educational activity of the Polish Data Protection Authority 24 Professor Paul De Hert: From the Principle of Accountability to System Responsibility – Key Concepts in Data Protection Law and Human Rights Law discussions Summary 32 Endre Győző Szabó: New data protection principles in light of the debate on Council conclusions 35 Christopher Kuner: Global standards for data protection and privacy from the business point of view 38 Jörg Polakiewicz: Convention 108 – still going strong after 30 years? 42 Attila Péterfalvi: Closing speech of the budapest conference 47 Wojciech Rafał Wiewiórowski: Privacy and the Liability of Intermediary Service Provider in the Clouds. E-Governmental Aspects 49 Jörg Polakiewicz: Keynote speech of the Warsaw Conference 60 Jacob Kohnstamm: Effectiveness of personal data protection principles in the changing world 62 Eng. Wacław Iszkowski, Dr. T.S.: Illusion of Personal Data Protection? 64 2 David Wright: The state of the art in privacy impact assessment 69 Daniel Drewer: A tailor-made data protection framework for the European Police Offi ce 77 Graham Greenleaf: The infl uence of European data privacy standards outside Europe: Implications for globalisation of Convention 108 Summary 79 Jean-Philippe Walter: The modernization of the Convention of the Council of Europe for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (ETS No. 108): moving from a European standard towards a universal standard for data protection? 81 Annex 87 Professor Paul De Hert: From the Principle of Accountability to System Responsibility – Key Concepts in Data Protection Law and Human Rights Law discussions 88 Graham Greenleaf: The infl uence of European data privacy standards outside Europe: Implications for globalisation of Convention 108 121 Programmes of the data protection conferences 154 3 header FOREWORD Where are we now and where are we heading? – this question was asked by the topic-raising document prepared for one of the conferences of our data protection project, to be closed by this publication. With our partners, the Ministry of the Interior of Poland, the Polish Data Protection Authority (GIODO), the Ministry of Justice of Spain, the Council of Europe, the Acad- emy of European Law and the Offi ce of the Hungarian Data Protection Commissioner, we were seeking answers in three consecutive conferences to several issues that are related only to data protection in the narrow sense of the term, but in a broader context, they relate to several activities of economy and governance. During the term of the Hungarian Presidency we afforded special attention in the fi eld of home affairs and justice to data protection and treated it as a priority in Council work. The project gave us an excellent opportunity to discuss the current issues with academic representatives, the experts of the subject. The data protection framework of the European Union is going to be renewed comprehensively. The process of globalization, the emergence of new technologies, as well as the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon all require a review of the legal framework. The Directive of the European Union on data protection serves the protection of the individual and the free fl ow of personal data in the entire territory of the Union. It is expected that these two fundamental objectives will remain the focus of the future regulation as well. The lectures of the conferences also underpinned the concept that a stronger legislative harmonization would serve both protection of the rights of the individual and the free fl ow of data better than the current fragmented regulation that varies signifi cantly by country. In the fi eld of protecting the rights of the individual, the European Union should not set any other aim than to extend the data protection norms guaranteed within its own borders to data man- agement regimes that affect third countries or to cases where data are forwarded to countries outside the Union. For that purpose, it has become urgent to explore the opportunity provided by the Convention of the Council of Europe, furthermore, ultimately the development of global benchmarks. This work is now in progress, and obviously, the European Union must take the initia- tive in this fi eld. The sociological effects of global information society and its impact on public life could affect the lives of current and future generations to an extent not yet known. As deep as these impacts may be, concerning the handling of personal data we must never lose sight of our original objective: the 4 protection of the individual and human dignity. The exercise of individual rights should be enabled in a global environment as well, for that purpose, while maintaining the current level of protection, legal regulation should be adapted to the new conditions to the necessary extent. In addition to a global outlook, the European Union should develop a data protection regime that focuses on and serves its own objectives. Economic considerations call for a smoothly operating internal market without obstacles, within that data protection regulations ensuring the fl ow of data. The conferences have validated both the necessity and the feasibility of that. Our publication presents the written transcripts of selected lectures from the conferences organ- ized under the project. I trust that the readers of this volume will fi nd useful and interesting ideas in the publication. I would like to thank everyone who helped us with the completion of the project for their support and efforts. Tibor Navracsics Deputy Prime Minister Minister of Public Administration and Justice 5 header WELCOME SPEECH AT THE INTERNATIONAL DATA PROTECTION CONFERENCE IN BUDAPEST Róbert Répássy Minister of State responsible for Justice By the middle of the year the Hungarian Presidency hands over the presidential duties of the Euro- pean Union to Poland, both symbolically and in reality. During these weeks it already seems timely that we should draw up some kind of balance based on the achievements of the recent period. Topics of our conference focus around the legal environment protecting the private sphere of the individual, more specifi cally the assessment of the implementation of the right to the protection of personal data. Nevertheless, please let me give you a brief summary of the efforts of the Hungarian Presidency in the fi eld of justice. In January the Hungarian Presidency took over the presidential duties from Belgium with the fi rm belief that if we managed to make the European Union stronger during our term, all the twenty- seven member states would benefi t from it, including Hungary. We did not intend to enforce our interests from the position of the Presidency, on the contrary, we used our Presidency to promote common European interests. It is a great pleasure to see that this approach proved to be not only honest, but also effective in many areas. If I had to give a list about the priorities of the Hungarian Presidency in the fi eld of justice, I would mention the following and would be pleased to give an account of the progress made in the indi- vidual areas. • In order to implement the fundamental rights more effi ciently, we support the accession of the European Union to the European Human Rights Convention. The preparation phase consisted of three negotiation rounds, and during the term of the Hungarian Presidency we managed to conclude the expert level negotiations; • Also arising from our commitment to fundamental rights, we afford special attention to the fi rst annual report on the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Concerning the more effi cient implementation of the rights contained in the Charter, we adopted Council conclusions; • In order to alleviate the administrative obstacles making the implementation of rights in eve- ryday life more diffi cult, we put on the agenda the questions raised in the communication of the Commission on the implementation of EU citizenship rights; • It goes without saying that the protection and assistance of citizens victimized by crime was one of our priorities. In the fi eld of protection of victims, the Council approved by means of a resolution the Hungarian Presidency’s roadmap which provides determining guidelines on the efforts of the Union in this fi eld, in relation to the Commission’s victim protection package; • Also in the fi eld of cooperation in criminal law, we managed to make progress concerning the directive on attacks against information systems; in the Council meeting held in the middle of June, the ministers approved a general approach; 6 General Context • Regarding the draft directive on combating the sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, the so-called trialogues with the European Parliament are in progress and the enactment of this piece of legislation is now within reach; • Concerning the general part of the legislation aimed at creating the European Investigation Order, we have reached a general approach in the Council. • As regards participation in criminal procedure, we intended to make progress in the fi eld of relevant legislation uniformly applied in the Union, by accepting the draft on the right of the accused to information. Concerning this dossier, the trialogues conducted with the European Parliament are progressing well; • The Hungarian Presidency’s intention has been to promote the adoption of the succession law regulation, which will mean a new accomplishment in the Union level unifi cation of rules of private law, creating the “free traffi c” of resolutions adopted on matters of succession be- tween member states.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • J. Kohnstamm LL.M
    J. Kohnstamm LL.M. Curriculum vitae Jacob Kohnstamm has served as chairman of the Dutch Data Protection Authority from August 2004 until August 2016. Between 2008 and 2010 he also served as the elected vice chairman of the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (WP29). He was subsequently elected chairman of that body in 2010, and re-elected for a two-year mandate in 2012. WP29 is an independent advisory body composed of representatives of the various data protection supervisors in the European Union. Between 2011 and 2014 Kohnstamm was chairman of the Executive Committee of the International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners. As a preparation for hosting that Conference in Amsterdam in 2015, he initiated the Privacy Bridges project in 2014. The Privacy Bridges project united twenty U.S. and EU privacy specialists to find pragmatic and workable solutions to overcome the differences in privacy legislation in all parts of the world; solutions that have as primary goal to improve the control of users over their data. Since his retirement as chairman of the Dutch DPA in August 2016, Kohnstamm serves as vice-chair of the Royal Commission on Parliamentary Reform and as chairman of the Dutch Euthanasia Review Committee. Between 1999 and 2004, prior to his appointment as chairman of the Dutch DPA, Kohnstamm was a member of the Senate of the States General for D66 [Liberal Democrats]. He also was chairman of a large number of organisations and committees, including the Police IT Control Board. He was state secretary for Home Affairs between 1994 and 1998, in particular responsible for Urban Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 8 Visitors
    Appendix 8 Visitors 5 October 2000 19 October 2000 Mr Vladimir M Platonov Mr Walter Noel, Mr Hans Olav Ostgaard, Mr Leonid I Kovalskiy Minister for Assistant Secretary General, Mr Vladimir M Azbukin Intergovernmental Affairs Ministry of Justice, Norway Mr Anatoliy S Voronin for the District of Virginia Waters, Canada 23 October 2000 26 October 2000 HE Heraldo Munoz Mr Yuan Yin, 17 October 2000 Valenzuela, Chief Director, Secretariat of Mr Marc Vandenborre, Chilean Vice Minister of the General Office of The Director-General, Customs Foreign Affairs State Council, People’s and Excise Administration, Republic of China Ministry of Finance, 24 October 2000 Belgium Mr Wang Julu, 26 October 2000 Deputy Secretary-General, Ms Gabriele Tsürtz, 17 October 2000 National Committee, Head of Division, External Senator the Hon Peter Cook, Chinese People’s Political Economic Relations, Deputy Leader of the Consultative Conference, Federal Ministry for Opposition in the Senate, People’s Republic of China Economic Affairs, Austria and Shadow Minister for Trade, Australia 25 October 2000 27 October 2000 Delegation led by Delegation of the Economic 18 October 2000 Mr Wu Anfu, Crime Investigation Delegation of the People’s Director of the Economic Department of the Ministry Government of Inner Crime Investigation of Public Security, People’s Mongolia Autonomous Department of the Ministry Republic of China: Region to Hong Kong: of Public Security, People’s Republic of China: Mr Liu Dong Mr Liu Xingzhu Mr Tong Dejun Mr Liu Jun Mr Liu Dong Mr Cao Haibo Mr Wang
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu Paper6.Pdf
    The Quest for a Vision for Europe: Lessons to be learned from Dutch and German Debates on the Future Democracy of European Union Hanco Jürgens, Amsterdam Institute for German Studies (DIA)/ Montesquieu Institute In November 2012, a day before Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte went to Brussels to join the EU summit, he apologized in Parliament for being not very specific about his efforts in the negotiations. He said he has to speak “with his mouth full of meal”, meaning that he could not answer the questions of the Members of Parliament in detail.1 After arriving in Brussels, he confirmed his position by stating that he had come to the EU summit with a loaded gun in his pocket and that it would not be in the Dutch interest to lay down his pistol on the table immediately. In its vagueness, Rutte’s stance is in line with the Dutch EU policy, which is traditionally seen as part of the foreign policy domain. Seen from this perspective, Dutch politicians should not be too open in public about their strategy, since this could harm their position at the EU negotiation table. For several reasons, one may ask whether this position is still accurate. Since the Treaty of Maastricht, the EU has become a policy domain far beyond the field of foreign affairs, concerning not only all ministries, but above all, the peoples of the member states. Therefore, democratic legitimacy and parliamentary control has become an important issue. One might ask why Dutch parliament allows its Prime Minister to keep his gun in his pocket.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Miami National Security & Armed
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI NATIONAL SECURITY & ARMED CONFLICT LAW REVIEW Volume 2 Summer 2012 THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI NATIONAL SECURITY & ARMED CONFLICT LAW REVIEW Volume 2 Summer 2012 Copyright © 2013, National Security and Armed Conflict Law Review All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted by any meanswhether auditory, graphic, mechanical, or electronic without written permission of both publisher and author, except in the case of brief excerpts used in critical articles and reviews. Unauthorized reproduction of any part of this work is illegal and is punishable by law. ISBN 978-1-300-44648-4 V THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI NATIONAL SECURITY & ARMED CONFLICT LAW REVIEW ________________________________________________ Executive Board Justin Levine Paul Jezierny Editor-in-Chief Staff Managing Editor Joel Feigenbaum Jillianne Pierce Executive Managing Editor External Marketing Editor Editorial Board Greg Widmer Alexander Roth Chief Article Editor Chief Notes & Comments Editor Tricia Robinson Justin Ortiz Symposium Editor Website Articles Editor Senior Article Editors Shawn Brooks Kate Lotz Corey Gray Cole Timonere Members Gretchen Cothron Krysta Markus Jared Dallue Paige Reese Matthew Davis David Roller Mark DeSanto Claire Rumler Timothy J. Green James Slater Alejandra Guarneros Jonathan Stamm Brian Heit Josh Stern Dan Kinney Zachary Ward James Lechter Michael Weiss Grant Lyons Aric Williams VI Article Requirements: The Executive Board of the University of Miami National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review welcomes the submission of articles written by professors, practitioners, and other scholars. The National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review accepts articles written on national security, law of war, and armed conflict-related areas of the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Publicatielijst Patrick Van Schie
    PUBLICATIELIJST PATRICK VAN SCHIE Boeken De liberale strijd voor vrouwenkiesrecht (Amsterdam, 2019) 270 pp. [met Fleur de Beaufort]; Burgers behoren bepalend te zijn (Den Haag, 2018) 101 pp.; Tussen geschiktheid en grondrecht. De ontwikkeling van het Nederlandse kiesrecht vanaf 1795 (Amsterdam, 2018) 418 pp [met Fleur de Beaufort, Peter van den Berg, Ron de Jong en Henk van der Kolk]; Passie voor individuele vrijheid (Den Haag, 2016) 179 pp.; Eigenzinnige liberalen. Onafhankelijk denkende politici in Nederland (Amsterdam, 2014) 267 pp. [met Fleur de Beaufort en Joop van den Berg]; Sociaal-liberalisme (Amsterdam, 2014) 198 pp. [met Fleur de Beaufort]; Neoliberalisme: een politieke fictie (Amsterdam, 2014) 79 pp. [met Martin van Hees en Mark van de Velde] Liberale spiegel. Reflecties op zestien veelgehoorde vooroordelen over het liberalisme en de VVD (Den Haag, 2013) 51 pp. [met Heleen Dupuis]; Het Liberalen Boek (Zwolle, 2011) 448 pp. [rijk geïllustreerde geschiedenis van de liberale theorie, de politieke praktijk en de maatschappelijke inbedding in Nederland alsmede van de Europese context en de ons omringende landen; samengesteld en geschreven met Fleur de Beaufort]; Vrijheidsstreven in verdrukking. Liberale partijpolitiek in Nederland 1901-1940 (Amsterdam, 2005) 503 pp. [dissertatie universiteit Leiden, tevens in handelseditie verschenen]; Aurea Libertas. Impressies van vijftig jaar Teldersstichting (Den Haag, 2004) 138 pp. [met Sabine Bierens]; Krijgsgerommel achter de kim. Analyse van de veiligheidsrisico's voor Nederland (TS-geschrift 89; Den Haag, 1999) 102 pp.; Nationaal belang. Over de bruikbaarheid van het begrip voor een liberaal buitenlands beleid (TS-geschrift 84; Den Haag, 1996) 60 pp.; Europa: een volgende akte. Een verkenning van de grondslagen en de toekomst van de Gemeenschap en de positie van Nederland daarin (TS-geschrift 76; Den Haag, 1992) 225 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Personalization of Political Newspaper Coverage: a Longitudinal Study in the Dutch Context Since 1950
    Personalization of political newspaper coverage: a longitudinal study in the Dutch context since 1950 Ellis Aizenberg, Wouter van Atteveldt, Chantal van Son, Franz-Xaver Geiger VU University, Amsterdam This study analyses whether personalization in Dutch political newspaper coverage has increased since 1950. In spite of the assumption that personalization increased over time in The Netherlands, earlier studies on this phenomenon in the Dutch context led to a scattered image. Through automatic and manual content analyses and regression analyses this study shows that personalization did increase in The Netherlands during the last century, the changes toward that increase however, occurred earlier on than expected at first. This study also shows that the focus of reporting on politics is increasingly put on the politician as an individual, the coverage in which these politicians are mentioned however became more substantive and politically relevant. Keywords: Personalization, content analysis, political news coverage, individualization, privatization Introduction When personalization occurs a focus is put on politicians and party leaders as individuals. The context of the news coverage in which they are mentioned becomes more private as their love lives, upbringing, hobbies and characteristics of personal nature seem increasingly thoroughly discussed. An article published in 1984 in the Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf forms a good example here, where a horse race betting event, which is attended by several ministers accompanied by their wives and girlfriends is carefully discussed1. Nowadays personalization is a much-discussed phenomenon in the field of political communication. It can simply be seen as: ‘a process in which the political weight of the individual actor in the political process increases 1 Ererondje (17 juli 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Vrijzinnig Maar Bovenal Onvoorspelbaar
    pagina 8 • Idee. juli 2004 • Thema: Hoe sociaal is liberaal KOHNSTAMMS LOOPBAAN ALS JAKOBSLADDER NAAR ESSENTIE D66 Vrijzinnig maar bovenal onvoorspelbaar , - Jacób Kohnstamm verlaat per 1 au'gustus de, driemansfractie van D66 in de Eerste Kamer om voorzitter te worden van het College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens. Daarmee sluit hij een aaneengesloten periodefclf van bijna dertig jaar waarin hij voor en namens D66 functies bekleedde "als amateur, semi-prof en prof". Bij de start van de werkátel.iers van D66 Amsterdam eind mei keek hij terug op zijn loopbaan "omdat het persoonlijke ook altijd politiek is". We praten met hem verder over de 'fantastische, soms duivelse dilemma's' die hij daar aanstipte omdat hij daarmee doordrong tot wat hij ziet als de essentie van D66: onvoorspelbaar zijn, en vooral blijven. Het gaat niet uitsluitend om het eindresultaat, het gaat bovenal om de weg ernaartoe. DOOR ARTHUR OLOF EN EMILY VAN DE VIJVER Jacob kwam in 1968 naar Amsterdam vanuit Brussel, waar vader Max sinds 1952, als secretaris van Jean Monnet, een belangrijke rol speelde bij de totstandkoming van de Europese samenwer­ king en integratie, toen in het Europese Genootschap voor Kolen en StaaL Hij kan zich herinneren dat hij in 1969 in het Amsterdamse studentenhuis met drie huisgenoten tot diep in de nacht een heftig debat voerde waarbij het ene duo WO-standpunten verdedigde, hij met een ander 066- punten, "Aan het begin van mijn dertigjarige loopbaan vierde ik meteen een ultieme overwinning van D66 op de VVD , Om drie uur 's nachts belden de 'VVD'ers' hun partij om zich als lid op te geven, maar daar werd niet opgenomen.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Fundamental Rights in a Digital Age Proceedings, Outcome and Background Documents
    Protecting fundamental rights in a digital age Proceedings, Outcome and Background Documents 2013 – 2014 Inquiry on electronic mass surveillance of EU citizens Protecting fundamental rights in a digital age Proceedings, Outcome and Background Documents 2013-2014 1 2 Introduction by Claude Moraes MEP, Rapporteur of the Inquiry on electronic mass surveillance of EU citizens.................................................................................................................................................................5 European Parliament resolution of 12 March 2014 on the US NSA surveillance programme, surveillance bodies in various Member States and their impact on EU citizens’ fundamental rights and on transatlantic cooperation in Justice and Home Affairs (2013/2188(INI))...................................................................................9 Explanatory statement (A7-0139/2014).............................................................................................................49 European Parliament resolution of 4 July 2013 on the US National Security Agency surveillance programme, surveillance bodies in various Member States and their impact on EU citizens’ privacy (2013/2682(RSP))........57 Working document on the US and EU Surveillance programmes and their impact on EU citizens fundamental rights by Claude Moraes...............................................................................................................65 Working document on the relation between the surveillance practices in the
    [Show full text]
  • Verloren Vertrouwen
    VERLOREN VERTROUWEN EN DE WEG NAAR HERSTEL Een terugblik op twaalf jaar verkiezingsnederlagen NOVEMBER 2007 1. Inleiding 1.1. Aanleiding Is een terugblik op het reilen en zeilen van D66 in de periode van 1994, toen de partij een historisch hoogtepunt van 24 zetels behaalde, tot het najaar van 2006, toen er nog 3 zetels resteerden, echt nodig? Is alles al niet eens gezegd, liggen er niet voldoende evaluaties en andere geschriften die ons met de neus op de feiten en het eigen falen drukken? Is de eigen D66-boezem niet langzamerhand overvol van alle handen die er in de loop van de jaren ingestoken zijn? Zou wéér een analyse niet de grens van het masochisme overschrijden? Kunnen we niet gewoon overgaan tot de orde van de dag? Nee, zo meende het D66-congres op 12 mei 2007. Het congres was van mening dat het Landelijk Bestuur met de nota "Klaar voor de klim" te snel wilde overgaan tot een nieuwe start, zonder zich voldoende rekenschap te geven van de redenen waarom D66 de afgelopen twaalf jaar aan politiek profiel en electoraal vertrouwen heeft verloren. De congresmotie die aanleiding was voor deze evaluatie, verwees, hoe ook verwoord en toegelicht, naar een zorg onder de D66-leden en indirect naar een onvrede onder de D66-kiezers. De commissie die door het Landelijk Bestuur is belast met de uitvoering van de congresmotie, erkent deze zorg en meent dat het na twaalf jaar verkiezingsnederlagen zinvol is om aan de hand van de recente geschiedenis en een aantal terugkerende thema's te bezien waar D66 keer op keer tegen aan loopt.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Van Tekst
    Haags duet Frits Bolkestein en Margriet Brandsma bron Frits Bolkestein en Margriet Brandsma, Haags duet. Prometheus, Amsterdam 1998 Zie voor verantwoording: https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/bolk008haag01_01/colofon.php Let op: werken die korter dan 140 jaar geleden verschenen zijn, kunnen auteursrechtelijk beschermd zijn. 5 Woord vooraf Twee jaar geleden ontstond bij mij het idee om tijdens de eerstvolgende verkiezings- en formatieperiode een dagboek bij te houden. Het leek me interessant om die aantekeningen te zien naast die van een politicus. Het plan rijpte nadat ik een discussie had bijgewoond over omgangsvormen tussen politici en parlementaire journalisten. Daar viel me op dat de opvattingen van politici over journalisten (en omgekeerd) clichématig waren: ‘Parlementaire journalisten zijn lui en dientengevolge niet meer geïnteresseerd in de inhoud.’ Omgekeerd: ‘Politici zijn ijdel, arrogant en overwegend saai.’ Parlementaire journalisten koesteren nóg een vooroordeel over politici: op werkbezoeken in verre, liefst warme buitenlanden zijn ze openhartiger en toeschietelijker dan op het Binnenhof. In november 1996 brachten vier fractievoorzitters een bezoek aan de Antillen en Aruba. Tijdens dat bezoek, aan de bar van een hotel in Oranjestad, sprak ik met Frits Bolkestein over mijn idee voor een ‘dubbel-dagboek’. Ik vroeg hem of hij dagboeknotities wilde maken tijdens de eerstvolgende verkiezings- en formatieperiode om die na afloop naast die van mij te leggen. Bolkestein bevestigde het vooroordeel: hij reageerde enthousiast. Mijn idee legde ik voor aan Frits Bolkestein omdat ik, als parlementair verslaggever van het NOS-Journaal, de VVD zou volgen in de maanden voor en na de verkiezingen van 1998. We spraken af dat we onze dagboeken zouden openen op de dag van de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen, 4 maart 1998, en zouden sluiten op de dag van de beëdiging van een nieuw kabinet.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrondissementsparket Te 'S-Hertogenbosch
    Paus Benedictus XVI Aartsbisschop André Léonard (België) Paus Benedictus XVI / Vaticaan T.a.v. Kardinaal Mgr. André Léonard Wollemarkt 15, 2800 Mechelen (e-mail: [email protected]) Geachte Monseigneur André Léonard, In de volgende link (met deeplinks aan bewijzen) vindt u nogmaals onze aangifte d.d. 30 maart 2011 aan Paus Benedictus XVI die wij persoonlijk bij uw secretaris in Mechelen zijn gaan inleveren. http://www.mstsnl.net/ekc/pdf/aangifte-paus-30-maart-2011.pdf Wij verzoeken u nogmaals kennis te nemen van de inhoud (inclusief de deeplinks), die inhoud hier als herhaald en ingelast te beschouwen en tevens aan aartsbisschop André Léonard gericht. In onze bij u ingeleverde aangifte d.d. 30 maart 2011 hebben wij Paus Benedictus XVI verzocht om vanuit het Vaticaan een strafrechtelijk onderzoek te starten naar de daarin beschreven gepleegde sluipmoordende genocide (eco-terrorisme) op miljarden wereldbewoners (waaronder alle Rooms- Katholieken) vanuit Nederland en België met miljoenen/ miljarden kilogrammen valselijk geëtiketteerd zeer giftige kankerverwekkende stoffen als arseenzuur en chroomtrioxide (chroom VI) in strijd met de Nationale wetgeving, Europese richtlijnen, verordeningen, en Internationale verdragen. Heden (na maar liefst 9 maanden) hebben wij van Paus Benedictus XVI daarop nog geen enkele reactie mogen ontvangen. Wij vragen ons daarbij dan ook af of u betreffende aangifte, zoals was toegezegd door uw secretaris, wel ter afhandeling hebt doorgestuurd aan Paus Benedictus XVI. Aanvullend op die aangifte d.d. 30 maart
    [Show full text]
  • 'Aan Die Onzin Hebben We Nooit Meegedaan'
    ‘AAN DIE ONZIN HEBBEN WE NOOIT MEEGEDAAN’ De ontwikkeling van de grondslagen van D66 1972-1998 Mathijs kramer (1517082) [email protected] Begeleider: Prof. H. te Velde Tweede lezer: Dr. B.E. van der Boom Masterscriptie geschiedenis Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen Universiteit Leiden Woordaantal: 17.900 Datum: 24 augustus 2020 Inhoudsopgave Inleiding ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Literatuuroverzicht.............................................................................................................................................. 4 Methodologie ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Achtergrond 1966-1972 .................................................................................................................................... 11 2. 1972- 1977: Van opheffen naar doorgaan ........................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Inleiding ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Een partij in verval, stemmen over opheffing ............................................................................................. 15 2.3 Doorgaan wint voorzichtig tractie .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]