Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction Yangon Model United Nations, 2018 | VIII Annual Session Forum: The Human Rights Council Issue: Protecting the Basic Human Rights of Stateless People Student Officer: Victor Naing Position: Chair Introduction No matter the continent — Asia, Africa, or the Americas, statelessness is found in every corner of the world. Statelessness, like the name suggested, is a condition where a person does not belong to a country and does not have any nationality. Lack of a nationality and legal identity deprived the victims of statelessness the basic human rights and social services, such as education, healthcare, and even marriages, which the majority of the population can obtain. Though statelessness had been condemn and regarded as “inhumane” since the 1800s, it is still a prevalent issue today. According to the UNHCR’s report, Ending Statelessness Within 10 Years, statelessness is a man-made problem where millions of people’s nationality could be taken away in an extremely short time. Political directives such as discriminatory laws against a specific population group, sudden changes in state boundaries, and conflict and technicalities in laws, are some of the main causes of statelessness. However, the most important issue of statelessness is that it can be inherited from the pervious generations. As parents lack a nationality, it is challenging for their children to obtain a nationality as well, which resulted in the endless cycle of hardship and violations of human rights. Insecurity, humiliation, and violated rights are what the victims of statelessness experience on a daily basis. They are faced with restrictions for all their lives. Stateless children are invisible in the eyes of the government. They are often denied public education, medical needs, and legal protections from abuses. Even for the lucky few who could find a job, they fall victims to the substantially lower wages little to no chance of promotion, and lack of job security as there are no laws protecting them, compared to people with nationalities. The lack of official ID also make stateless people prone to arbitrary arrests, detention, and deportation. Families are also under the pressure of being torn apart at any minute. Many had to resort to private, non-governmental organizations to merely survive. Research Report | Page !1 of !9 Yangon Model United Nations, 2018 | VIII Annual Session Definition of Key Terms Universal Declaration of Human Rights Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a bill of rights drafted by different representatives of different backgrounds in 1948. The UDHR sets a standard for “fundamental human rights to be universally protected” (UN). The 30 articles of UDHR tackles different aspect of human rights protection, ranging from freedom of speech to the right for employment. Article 15 of UDHR Quoted directly from the Article 15 of UDHR: “Everyone has the right to a nationality” and “No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality”. Nationality Nationality is the legal bond between a person and a nation. A nationality is granted commonly though certain methods such as jus soli and jus sanguinis. Jus soli, or right of the soil, grants nationality anyone born in the territory of a nation, while jus sanguinis, or right of the blood, grants nationality to the children of a citizen. People can also apply to become a national of a country. Statelessness and Stateless Person Quoted directly from the Article 1 of 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons, “… the term “stateless person” means a person who is not considered as a national by any State under the operation of its law” (1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Person). The lack of nationality prevents stateless people from having the access to basic human rights. There are two types of Statelessness: de facto and de jure. De jure Statelessness De jure stateless person has the same definition as the aforementioned definition given by the Article 1 of 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons. De jure statelessness refers to people who are denied a nationality and a country of origin. De facto Statelessness Research Report | Page !2 of !9 Yangon Model United Nations, 2018 | VIII Annual Session Quoted directly from the UNHCR’s expert meeting, The Concept of Stateless Persons under International Law Summary Conclusions, De facto stateless persons are “persons outside the country of their nationality who are unable or, for valid reasons, are unwilling to avail themselves of the protection of that country” (UNHCR). De facto stateless people are people who once had a nationality but are no longer under the protection of their nation because “they themselves renounce the assistance and protection of the countries of which they are nationals” (A Study on Statelessness, UN) Refugee and the Undocumented Migrants According to the Geneva Refugee Convention, “A refugee...is someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion (Geneva Refugee Convention).” Refugees may hold a nationality from their country of origin. However, some refugees may be de facto stateless, and some stateless people may be refugees. Refugees who hold a national are also referred as de facto stateless persons. Undocumented migrants are ones who remain in a country without legal authorities such as residence permit, or visa. Though undocumented migrants may face problems that stateless people would face, they have a country of origin and a nationality. Therefore, they cannot be considered stateless. Intergenerational Cycle of Statelessness Statelessness can the dire consequences of multiple cases such as political and legal directives, discrimination against a population or ethnic group, sudden redrawing of borders, and technicalities and conflicts in laws. These causes could make a person stateless overnight. However, statelessness is also a cycle. Statelessness is also inherited from their parents to their children. For example, in a country where nationality is granted by jus sanguinis, children with parents who are stateless (not citizens of that country), would also not be granted a nationality. As a result, the children suffer from the lack of nationality, passports, and legal identity just like their parents. The intergenerational cycle of statelessness refers to the cycle of statelessness that affects future generations. History Research Report | Page !3 of !9 Yangon Model United Nations, 2018 | VIII Annual Session In July of 1951, Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, a multilateral treaty aimed to protect refugees, was drafted. The 1951 Convention defined refugees and methods to protect them, however it failed to mention the status of stateless persons. As a result, General Assembly called for another convention in 1954, defining and addressing the issue of statelessness. From the ancient Greek societies to the aftermath of World War II, statelessness can be seen throughout history. Timeline of Relevant Resolutions, Treaties and Events Date Description of event A Study of Statelessness August 1949 The United Nations published a report on the study of statelessness which included statistics, situations before WW2, difficulties and etc. Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons September 28, 1954 Multilateral treaty that defined stateless person aimed to protect stateless people Convention on Reduction of Statelessness August 30, 1961 Multilateral treaty aimed to reduce statelessness. Campaign to End Statelessness in 10 Years November 2014 Campaign launched by the UNHCR that included statistics and difficulties of statelessness and proposed possible solutions. Key Issues Technicalities and Conflicts in Laws A person’s nationality is granted through two main methods: jus soli (by birth) and jus sanguinis (by blood). The technicalities in laws would prevent people, especially children, from obtaining a nationality. For example, if a person is born in the territory not claimed by the state after the redrawing of borders, then the person will not be considered a citizen of that state. Another example would be if a child is born within the territory of a state but has stateless parents, then the child would not be granted a nationality. Lack of nationality and legal identity made it extra challenging for stateless people to apply for nationalities in other countries. Also, in some countries, a mother’s nationality cannot be passed on to her children, leaving the children stateless if the father doesn’t have a citizenship. Research Report | Page !4 of !9 Yangon Model United Nations, 2018 | VIII Annual Session Discrimination Discrimination plays a major role in deprivation nationality. In addition to the aforementioned gender discrimination, where women are restricted from conferring their nationalities to their children, an entire population group could be denied nationality due to factors such as as ethnicity and religion. Based on those factors, individuals from targeted minority groups could face arbitrarily deprivation of nationality. Individuals from targeted minority groups also face more complex process when applying for a nationality. The Inheritance of Statelessness Statelessness affect tens of millions of people globally. Stateless people would face deprivation of human rights and legal protections due to the lack
Recommended publications
  • Contesting Buddhist Narratives Democratization, Nationalism, and Communal Violence in Myanmar
    Policy Studies 71 Contesting Buddhist Narratives Democratization, Nationalism, and Communal Violence in Myanmar Matthew J. Walton and Susan Hayward Contesting Buddhist Narratives Democratization, Nationalism, and Communal Violence in Myanmar About the East-West Center The East-West Center promotes better relations and understanding among the people and nations of the United States, Asia, and the Pacific through cooperative study, research, and dialogue. Established by the US Congress in 1960, the Center serves as a resource for infor- mation and analysis on critical issues of common concern, bringing people together to exchange views, build expertise, and develop policy options. The Center’s 21-acre Honolulu campus, adjacent to the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, is located midway between Asia and the US main- land and features research, residential, and international conference facilities. The Center’s Washington, DC, office focuses on preparing the United States for an era of growing Asia Pacific prominence. The Center is an independent, public, nonprofit organization with funding from the US government, and additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, foundations, corporations, and govern- ments in the region. Policy Studies an East-West Center series Series Editors Dieter Ernst and Marcus Mietzner Description Policy Studies presents original research on pressing economic and political policy challenges for governments and industry across Asia, About the East-West Center and for the region's relations with the United States. Written for the The East-West Center promotes better relations and understanding policy and business communities, academics, journalists, and the in- among the people and nations of the United States, Asia, and the formed public, the peer-reviewed publications in this series provide Pacifi c through cooperative study, research, and dialogue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scramble for Rakhine
    The Scramble for Rakhine Introduction Conflict in Myanmar today holds the track record of the longest civil war of our times. It is also one of the most complex, most protracted ones, involving some 20 armed groups struggling for autonomy, a history of failed attempts at building a nation from a multi-ethnic, multi-religious and multi-lingual population and a military accused of the most heinous of war crimes committed in the name of national unity. Hopes to find a peaceful settlement to the conflict were high when the military government initiated far-reaching reforms starting in 2011 which included the lifting of censorship and creation of space to political opposition. Finally, the democratic election of a quasi-civilian government under the leadership of Nobel Peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, known worldwide for her vocal opposition to the Myanmar military (Tatmadaw), consolidated the optimism within the population. The socio-political reforms led to considerable improvements in Myanmar’s bilateral relations; International sanctions were lifted, and thanks to Myanmar’s largely untapped wealth in natural resources and its geostrategic position connecting South and Southeast Asia, the country quickly became a focus of policy- makers in Asia and beyond. Soon enough, the phenomenon came to be dubbed the ‘gold rush’ to Myanmar. Yet, Myanmar’s democratic transformation has failed to achieve peace. Four years into the new democratic government’s term in office, many ethnic groups suspect that Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy (NLD) are lacking a genuine will to address their communities’ grievances. As a result, new waves of violence swept the country soon after the NLD’s election.
    [Show full text]
  • Rohingya Crisis in Southeast Asia: the Jihadi Dimension
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Rohingya Crisis in Southeast Asia: The Jihadi Dimension Jasminder Singh 2017 Jasminder Singh. (2017). Rohingya Crisis in Southeast Asia: The Jihadi Dimension. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 069). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82802 Nanyang Technological University Downloaded on 30 Sep 2021 06:40:49 SGT Rohingya Crisis in Southeast Asia: The Jihadi Dimension By Jasminder Singh Synopsis The Rohingya problem is an old one. After nearly 70 years, the problem has been greatly aggravated by rising sectarian violence by radical Buddhist groups against Muslims and the involvement of transnational terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda and the self-proclaimed Islamic State. Commentary THE ROHINGYA crisis in Myanmar has a long history. Following Burma’s independence in January 1948, a Rohingya-based insurgency broke out in northern Arakan, now known as Rakhine State, with the aim of integrating with East Pakistan, present-day Bangladesh. By the late 1950s, the mujahidin-oriented insurgency was crushed by the Burmese Army. Since the 1970s, various Islamist groups have surfaced to take up the cudgels of liberation, either to gain greater autonomy or outright independence. The key groups championing the Rohingya struggle include the Rohingya Solidarity Organisation, the Arakan Rohingya Islamic Front and Arakan National Liberation Organisation. Following the success of the Afghan Mujahidin in defeating the Soviets, since the 1980s, extremist jihadi-oriented groups have espoused violent struggle against Myanmar, often with the support of Af-Pak based radical groups and by the late 1990s onwards, groups affiliated with Al Qaeda and Islamic State.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indonesia's Urgency on Adopting New Approach on Comprehensive Prevention in Countering Terrorism Strategy
    The Indonesia’s Urgency on Adopting New Approach on Comprehensive Prevention ... 103 The Indonesia’s Urgency on Adopting New Approach on Comprehensive Prevention in Countering Terrorism Strategy: Lesson Learnt from the Mako Detention Facility’s Riot and East Java Bombs Indah P. Amaritasari Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Indonesia dihadapkan pada rangkaian serangan teror pada Mei 2018, antara lain: peristiwa kerusuhan disertai penyanderaan polisi oleh narapidana terorisme di Rutan Mako Brimob Kelapa Dua, Depok pada 8 Mei 2018, aksi teror bom bunuh diri terjadi di tiga gereja secara bersamaan pada Minggu pagi, 13 Mei, bom bunuh diri di pintu masuk Polrestabes Surabaya pada 14 Mei. Rangkaian peristiwa ini menunjukkan bahwa terorisme masih menjadi ancaman keamanan di Indonesia. Sejumlah serangan teror di Indonesia diyakini dilakukan oleh kelompok teroris yang berbai’at ke ISIS. Indonesia dalam rangka penanggulangan terhadap acaman terorisme telah melakukan sejumlah pendekatan baik soft approach maupun hard approach dengan menggunakan model criminal justice. Namun demikian, Indonesia melakukan modifikasi pendekatan criminal justice dengan melibatkan peran militer. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pemahaman terhadap berbagai bentuk yang diasosiasikan dengan hard approach? dan bagaimana strategi baru yang juga perlu dipertimbangkan melihat ancaman yang ada? Tulisan ini mencoba mengeksplorasi berbagai kemungkinan strategi baru yang diadopsi Indonesia sebagai kelanjutan dari respon PBB terhadap
    [Show full text]
  • China's Myanmar Strategy
    Update Briefing Asia Briefing N°112 Beijing/Jakarta/Brussels, 21 September 2010 China’s Myanmar Strategy: Elections, Ethnic Politics and Economics the national elections as a challenge to its interests. I. OVERVIEW Rather, Beijing hopes they will serve its strategic and eco- nomic interests by producing a government perceived both Myanmar’s 2010 elections present challenges and oppor- domestically and internationally as more legitimate. tunities for China’s relationship with its south-western neighbour. Despite widespread international opinion that Two other factors impact Beijing’s calculations. China elections will be neither free nor fair, China is likely to sees Myanmar as having an increasingly important role accept any poll result that does not involve major insta- in its energy security. China is building major oil and gas bility. Beijing was caught off-guard by the Myanmar pipelines to tap Myanmar’s rich gas reserves and shorten military’s offensive into Kokang in August 2009 that sent the transport time of its crude imports from the Middle more than 30,000 refugees into Yunnan province. Since East and Africa. Chinese companies are expanding rap- then it has used pressure and mediation to push Naypy- idly into Myanmar’s hydropower sector to meet Chinese idaw and the ethnic groups that live close to China’s demand. Another factor impacting Beijing’s strategy to- border to the negotiating table. Beyond border stability, wards Myanmar is the U.S. administration’s engagement Beijing feels its interests in Myanmar are being chal- policy, which Beijing sees as a potential challenge to its lenged by a changing bilateral balance of power due influence in Myanmar and part of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Public Awareness of Terrorism in Myanmar Abstract
    Dagon University Commemoration of 25th Anniversary Silver Jubilee Research Journal Volume 9,No.1 276 Enhancing Public Awareness of Terrorism in Myanmar Thinn Thinn Latt1 Abstract Terrorism is the unlawful use of violence with the aim of furthering a political or ideological goal at the expense of the general population. Terrorism can take many forms and has many causes, often more than one. It can have its roots in religious, social, or political conflicts, when one community is oppressed by another. Terrorism affects many nations through spreading violence, fear and instability throughout the region. Terrorism is an issue that affects the world and incidents have drawn much more attention since 9/11. Terrorism is a serious global threat and the rapid advancement in information technology including the popular use of social media by radicalized groups has negative and serious implications for Myanmar security, stability, and democratic transition. Myanmar people are generally aware of traditional security and state-centric security but have limited understanding of non-traditional security issues such as violent extremism and terrorism. Recent terrorist attacks are new to Myanmar. As such, the subject of terrorism or counter-terrorism had not been seriously considered in the national security formulation. The primary purpose of this research is to increase the knowledge and understanding of people in Myanmar about terrorism. Keywords: Terrorism, Terrorist, Violence, Political, Economic, Civilian, Government, Target Introduction Terrorism has become a constant threat inside and outside our society. It constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security. The lack of understanding of the extent of terrorism has led to many governments to implement hasty solutions based on untested assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lesson from Aung San Suu Kyi's Nobel Peace Prize
    THE DANGERS OF INTERNATIONAL AWARDS: A LESSON FROM AUNG SAN SUU KYI’S NOBEL PEACE PRIZE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Taylor Rae McMillin In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major Department: Communication May 2019 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title THE DANGERS OF INTERNATIONAL AWARDS: A LESSON FROM AUNG SAN SUU KYI’S NOBEL PEACE PRIZE By Taylor Rae McMillin The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Robert Mejia Chair Ann Burnett Christina Weber Approved: July 5, 2019 Stephenson Beck Date Department Chair iv ABSTRACT Having spent over 20 years under house arrest fighting for democracy in Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi has been a bastion for peace for decades. She has received many international awards, including the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991, which she accepted in person in 2012. The plight of the Rohingya, a Muslim minority in Myanmar, has marred Suu Kyi’s reputation as a bastion of peace, leading to calls for her to lose her Peace Prize. Why is it that Suu Kyi’s image as the future of peace so different from reality? That question is what this research attempts to answer. Through a rhetorical analysis of Suu Kyi’s Nobel lecture and the media coverage that followed it, the impact of the use of tropes becomes evident.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Myanmar Strategy
    Update Briefing Asia Briefing N°112 Beijing/Jakarta/Brussels, 21 September 2010 China’s Myanmar Strategy: Elections, Ethnic Politics and Economics the national elections as a challenge to its interests. I. OVERVIEW Rather, Beijing hopes they will serve its strategic and eco- nomic interests by producing a government perceived both Myanmar’s 2010 elections present challenges and oppor- domestically and internationally as more legitimate. tunities for China’s relationship with its south-western neighbour. Despite widespread international opinion that Two other factors impact Beijing’s calculations. China elections will be neither free nor fair, China is likely to sees Myanmar as having an increasingly important role accept any poll result that does not involve major insta- in its energy security. China is building major oil and gas bility. Beijing was caught off-guard by the Myanmar pipelines to tap Myanmar’s rich gas reserves and shorten military’s offensive into Kokang in August 2009 that sent the transport time of its crude imports from the Middle more than 30,000 refugees into Yunnan province. Since East and Africa. Chinese companies are expanding rap- then it has used pressure and mediation to push Naypy- idly into Myanmar’s hydropower sector to meet Chinese idaw and the ethnic groups that live close to China’s demand. Another factor impacting Beijing’s strategy to- border to the negotiating table. Beyond border stability, wards Myanmar is the U.S. administration’s engagement Beijing feels its interests in Myanmar are being chal- policy, which Beijing sees as a potential challenge to its lenged by a changing bilateral balance of power due influence in Myanmar and part of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Protests and the Outbreak of the 8888 Uprising in Burma (March-October 1988) Pjaee, 17 (07 ) (2020)
    POPULAR PROTESTS AND THE OUTBREAK OF THE 8888 UPRISING IN BURMA (MARCH-OCTOBER 1988) PJAEE, 17 (07 ) (2020) POPULAR PROTESTS AND THE OUTBREAK OF THE 8888 UPRISING IN BURMA (MARCH-OCTOBER 1988) Maher Chasib Hatem Al-Fahad Department of History, Imam Al-Kadhum College, Iraq – Missan [email protected] Maher Chasib Hatem Al-Fahad, Popular Protests and the Outbreak of the 8888 Uprising in Burma (March – October 1988)-Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17 (07 ), 1673-1691. ISSN 1567-214x. Published October, 2020. Keywords: popular protests, uprising, state council, military rule, Burmese people. ABSTRACT This study deals with the topic (popular protests and the outbreak of the 8888 uprising in Burma, March - October 1988), a period that witnessed important political transformations, during which the Burmese people were expecting a breakthrough and emancipation from the tyranny of the ruling military clique over the reins of power since 1962, after the economic decline, the Burmese people rose against the government, which failed in raising the country to the desired level, after the continuous popular protests (especially students) during the period (March - August 1988) against the government, which culminated in the August Uprising, but the people did not succeed in overthrowing the government, but He forced it to change its heads, but the ruling system remained unchanged until September of the same year, in which the government of the Socialist Program Party ended and the State Council government restore law and order in the management of the country’s affairs, and during this uprising, the people expressed their rejection of the ruling military regime, The Governing Council of State, until it revealed its oppressive policy towards the people, which did not differ from its predecessor in persecuting the people, and their suffering continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Buddhism and the Exclusion of Rohingya in Myanmar
    Department of Theology Spring Term 2018 Master's Thesis in Human Rights 30 ECTS Political Buddhism and the Exclusion of Rohingya in Myanmar Exploring targeted religious nationalism using Myanmar’s Muslim Rohingya minority as a case study Author: Simon Knuters Supervisor: Universitetslektor Helen Lindberg Abstract The Rohingya Muslim minority, originally living in Rakhine state in western Myanmar, has been marginalized and harassed for decades. The Rohingya minority has been stateless since 1982 and they strive to become Burmese citizens. Many Rohingya have been displaced and live in refugee camps in Bangladesh with UNHCR calling them one of the most vulnerable refugee groups in the world. The military junta in Myanmar did not look kindly at rebellious minority groups in the country, brutally beating down all minority opposition. Despite Myanmar is now in a process of democratization, the State-Councilor and President in all but name, Aung San Suu Kyi has refused to address the ongoing violence suffered by Rohingya. Although Myanmar has 135 recognized minority groups, the country is far from being a pluralistic society. Ethnicity and religion have played an important role in creating a national identity in Myanmar; a national identity which systematically excludes Rohingya. This thesis argues that the reason for Rohingya’s exclusion is the so called political Buddhism in Myanmar. Political Buddhism is when excluding Buddhism, the Burmese ethnicity and aggressive nationalism are used to exclude and persecute minority groups perceived as non-Burman. This thesis explores, through an ideology analysis, how political Buddhism can be used to understand the exclusion of Rohingya in Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar's Armed Forces and the Rohingya Crisis
    [PEACEW RKS [ MYANMAR’S ARMED FORCES AND THE ROHINGYA CRISIS Andrew Selth Making Peace Possible ABOUT THE REPORT In the wake of the 2016 and 2017 “area clearance operations” against the Rohingya minority in Myanmar’s Rakhine State, this report explores the structure, training, and ethos of the Myanmar armed forces to clarify the implications and challenges of, as well as the prospects for, a solution and an accounting for past events. Draw- ing on an in-depth review of the literature, extensive field experience, and interviews, the report is produced by the Asia Center at the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) as part of its effort to inform policy and strategies on managing violent conflict. ABOUT THE AUTHOR An adjunct associate professor at the Griffith Asia Institute, Griffith University, in Brisbane, Australia, Andrew Selth has studied international security issues and Asian affairs for forty-five years as a diplomat, strategic intel- ligence analyst, and research scholar. He has published seven books and more than fifty peer-reviewed works, most of them about Myanmar and related subjects. He has also contributed to the public debate with numerous articles and reports and in online forums. Cover photo: A Myanmar soldier stands near Maungdaw, in the north of Rakhine State. (Soe Zeya Tun / Reuters Pictures) The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Confrontation Or Political Dialogue: Consequences of the Kokang Crisis for Peace and Democracy in Myanmar
    Myanmar Policy Briefing Nr 15 July 2015 Military Confrontation or Political Dialogue: Consequences of the Kokang Crisis for Peace and Democracy in Myanmar The renewed violence in the Kokang region after Pheung’s MNDAA had refused to of the northern Shan state in February 2015 accept the demand of the previous military has had serious repercussions for efforts to government to transform into a Border solve ethnic conflict in Burma/Myanmar1 and Guard Force (BGF).2 end the decades-old civil war. The fighting started when troops led by the veteran The outbreak of renewed conflict in the Kokang leader Pheung Kya-shin (Peng Kokang region has, in turn, clouded Jiasheng) resurfaced in the Kokang region the prospects of achieving a nationwide and attacked government and army positions ceasefire agreement (NCA) in Myanmar. after an interval of nearly six years. Pheung Battles broke out while negotiations were Kya-shin’s Myanmar National Democratic ongoing in Yangon. For while other ethnic Alliance Army (MNDAA), a former ceasefire armed organisations have called for peace group and government ally, was ousted talks and a halt to the renewed fighting, the from the Kokang region in 2009 by a rival quasi-civilian government under President Kokang leader with the help of the Tatmadaw Thein Sein has so far refused to address (national armed forces). This coup happened the Kokang crisis by political means. The Recommendations The humanitarian consequences of the renewed fighting in northeast Myanmar The renewed violence in the Kokang region are profound. Since 2011, around 200,000 has serious repercussions for efforts to solve civilians have been displaced in the Kachin ethnic conflict in Myanmar and clouded and northern Shan states, many of whom the prospects for achieving a nationwide have fled towards the China border.
    [Show full text]