DOCSLIB.ORG

Evidence for a Convergent Slowdown in Primate Molecular Rates and Its Implications for the Timing of Early Primate Evolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evidence for a Convergent Slowdown in Primate Molecular Rates and Its Implications for the Timing of Early Primate Evolution Evidence for a convergent slowdown in primate molecular rates and its implications for the timing of early primate evolution Michael E. Steipera,b,c,d,1 and Erik R. Seifferte aDepartment of Anthropology, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10065; Programs in bAnthropology and cBiology, The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, NY 10016; dNew York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, NY; and eDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8081 Edited by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved February 28, 2012 (received for review November 29, 2011) A long-standing problem in primate evolution is the discord divergences—that molecular rates were exceptionally rapid in between paleontological and molecular clock estimates for the the earliest primates, and that these rates have convergently time of crown primate origins: the earliest crown primate fossils slowed over the course of primate evolution. Indeed, a conver- are ∼56 million y (Ma) old, whereas molecular estimates for the gent rate slowdown has been suggested as an explanation for the haplorhine-strepsirrhine split are often deep in the Late Creta- large differences between the molecular and fossil evidence for ceous. One explanation for this phenomenon is that crown pri- the timing of placental mammalian evolution generally (18, 19). mates existed in the Cretaceous but that their fossil remains However, this hypothesis has not been directly tested within have not yet been found. Here we provide strong evidence that a particular mammalian group. this discordance is better-explained by a convergent molecular Here we test this “convergent rate slowdown” hypothesis in rate slowdown in early primate evolution. We show that molecu- primates using a two-step analysis. First, using a comprehensive lar rates in primates are strongly and inversely related to three paleontological and neontological primate dataset (Table S2), life-history correlates: body size (BS), absolute endocranial volume we modeled the evolutionary history of three phenotypic traits: (EV), and relative endocranial volume (REV). Critically, these traits body size (BS), absolute endocranial volume (EV), and relative can be reconstructed from fossils, allowing molecular rates to be endocranial volume (REV). These traits were chosen because ANTHROPOLOGY predicted for extinct primates. To this end, we modeled the evo- they are correlated with primate life history (20–22), which is in lutionary history of BS, EV, and REV using data from both extinct turn related to molecular evolutionary rates (23). Furthermore, and extant primates. We show that the primate last common an- BS, EV, and REV are much more easily estimable from fossils cestor had a very small BS, EV, and REV. There has been a subse- than are life-history variables themselves. These analyses yielded quent convergent increase in BS, EV, and REV, indicating that there ancestral reconstructions for BS, EV, and REV from the entire has also been a convergent molecular rate slowdown over primate primate radiation, enabling assessments of phenotypic and life- evolution. We generated a unique timescale for primates by pre- history changes over primate evolution. Second, we explicitly dicting molecular rates from the reconstructed phenotypic values tested whether patterns of variation in molecular rates are corre- for a large phylogeny of living and extinct primates. This analysis lated with patterns of variation in BS, EV, and REV. Molecular – suggests that crown primates originated close to the K Pg bound- rates were estimated from four large DNA-sequence datasets to- ary and possibly in the Paleocene, largely reconciling the molecular taling over 100 Mb, and these rates were correlated with BS, EV, and fossil timescales of primate evolution. and REV using phylogenetically corrected regression techniques. Finally, we joined the results of these two analyses as a mo- hen molecular rates are constant, divergence dates can be lecular clock technique. We predicted molecular rates for pri- Westimated by using fossils to calibrate “molecular clocks” (1). mates based on the BS, EV, and REV reconstruction from our However, there is great variation in molecular rates among species analysis of fossil and extant primates and our regression for- (2–7), and this phenomenon can lead to inaccurate or biased mo- mulae. In other words, we predict the molecular rates of long- lecular clock estimates. This problem has precipitated the de- extinct primates using our knowledge of their phenotypic velopment of methods that model rate variation across lineages to attributes rooted in the fossil and extant data. This is a significant date phylogenies when rates vary (8–11). These “relaxed clock” departure from the traditional method of generating molecular methods use multiple calibrations and allow rates to vary according rates using fossils as calibrations. Because our method estimates to the parameters of a model. Relaxed clock methods are especially molecular rates by using paleontological, phylogenetic, geo- appropriate for primates, because this clade exhibits large and logical, and neontological sources, we feel that it has strong systematic variation in molecular rates both within and among advantages over traditional calibration techniques. groups (e.g., the “hominoid slowdown”) (2, 4, 7, 12, 13, 14). Nev- ertheless, the application of these methods still results in large Results differences between paleontological and molecular estimates for First, we tested whether BS, EV, and REV have changed many primate groups (Fig. 1 and Table S1). This discordance is directionally over primate evolution by using a Bayesian method particularly striking for the origin of the primate crown group, to calculate the harmonic mean-likelihood values for a number because recent molecular studies suggest a Late Cretaceous esti- of models (Table 1). For all three traits, the nondirectional mate (an average of ∼82 Ma) for this event and yet the oldest crown primate fossils are ∼56 Ma old (15)—adifferenceof∼45%. Fur- thermore, studies that have statistically modeled sampling, speci- Author contributions: M.E.S. designed research; M.E.S. and E.R.S. performed research; ation, and preservation rates over the course of primate evolution M.E.S. and E.R.S. analyzed data; and M.E.S. and E.R.S. wrote the paper. are similarly consistent with an ancient origin for crown primates The authors declare no conflict of interest. (16, 17), showing that there are also wide gaps between these This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. methods and “direct reading” approaches to the fossil record. 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. Here we investigate an alternative hypothesis for the dis- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. crepancy between molecular and fossil estimates of early primate 1073/pnas.1119506109/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1119506109 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 Dates from the literature: Oldest fossil Avg. molecular Hominidae Great apes This study’s dates: Uncorrected EV corrected BS corrected REV corrected Old World Monkeys Cebidae Marmosets, tamarins, owl & squirrel monkeys Tarsius Tarsiers Strepsirrhini Lemurs & lorises 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Cretaceous PALEO. EOCENE OLIGO. MIOCENE Pl-Pl Cenozoic Fig. 1. Time-scaled phylogeny depicting divergence dates for the main groups of primates. Dates along the x axis are in Ma. Average molecular clock date estimates are from six recent studies (Table S1). The fossil femur cartoon indicates the earliest paleontological crown representatives of each taxon: crown Primates and crown Haplorhini, Teilhardina asiatica, 55.8 Ma, or, less securely, slightly older Altiatlasius koulchii (15, 57, 58); crown Strepsirrhini, Sahar- agalago,37Ma(59–61); crown Anthropoidea, Biretia, 37 Ma (59); crown Catarrhini, Morotopithecus, 20.6 Ma (62), crown Cebidae, long-lineage hypothesis (63), Branisella,26–27 Ma (64); crown Cebidae, successive radiation hypothesis (65), Lagonimico (66) and others, 13.3 Ma (66, 67); crown Cercopithecoidea, Microcolobus, 9.9 Ma (68); crown Hominidae, Sivapithecus, 12.5 Ma (69). The colored circles indicate the average divergence estimates from both uncorrected and corrected methods (Table 3). Brownian-motion model was rejected in favor of a directional result alone generally supports a slowdown in molecular rates in evolution model based on an analysis of the harmonic mean- primate evolution. likelihood values using Bayes factors (SI Text and Tables S3–S6). Second, we tested for a specific relationship between BS, EV, Subsequently, we used a Bayesian method to reconstruct the and REV and molecular rates in four large DNA-sequence ancestral values for BS, EV, and REV at nodes throughout the datasets. In 10 of the 12 phylogenetically corrected regressions primate phylogeny (24) (Fig. 2 and Tables S7 and S8). This there is a significant inverse relationship between molecular rates analysis reconstructed the BS of the primate last common an- and our three phenotypic predictors: BS, EV, and REV (Fig. 3 cestor (LCA) as ∼55 g, with a small EV (2.3 cm3; cc) only slightly and Table 2). These traits explain a large proportion of the larger than the fossil plesiadapiform Ignacius (2.14 cc) (25). The variance in molecular rates. This result provides strong evidence REV of the primate LCA was reconstructed as having been that life-history correlates are related to molecular rates in pri- lower than that of any known primate, living or extinct. mates, as has been found for primates and other mammals (6, 23, fi fi We conclude that BS, EV, and REV have evolved direction- 26). Speci cally noteworthy is the nding that molecular rates ally over primate evolution. Since the primate LCA, all major are very rapid in primates with small BS and EV and low REV. primate lineages have convergently evolved higher BS, EV, and Critically, these analyses generated regression models that can be used to predict molecular rates from BS, EV, and REV data REV.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Clock: Insights and Pitfalls
    Molecular clock: insights and pitfalls • An historical presentation of the molecular clock. • Birth of the molecular clock • Neutral Theory of evolution • The Nearly Neutral Theory of Evolution • The molecular clock is a « sloppy » clock. • A variable « tick rate » • Different rates for different groups • Calibrating a molecular phylogenetic tree • Dating Methods --- Introductory seminar on the use of molecular tools in natural history collections - 6-7 November 2007, RMCA --- A historical presentation of the molecular clock -1951-1955: Sanger sequenced the first protein, the insulin. Give the potential for using molecular sequences to construct phylogeny -1962: Zuckerkandl and Pauling: AA differences between the hemoglobin of different species is correlated with the time passed since they diverged. Divergence time (T) dAB / 2 A B Rate = (dAB / 2) / T C D --- Introductory seminar on the use of molecular tools in natural history collections - 6-7 November 2007, RMCA --- A historical presentation of the molecular clock Fixed or lost by chance Kimura, 1968 Eliminated by selection Fixed by selection Selection theory more in agreement with the rate of morphological evolution (Modified from Bromham and Penny, 2003) --- Introductory seminar on the use of molecular tools in natural history collections - 6-7 November 2007, RMCA --- The Neutral Theory of molecular evolution Eliminated by selection Fixed by selection Kimura, 1968 Fixed or lost by chance GENETIC DRIFT ν ν Molecular rate of evolution = Mutation rate 2N e * 1/2N e = (Modified from
    [Show full text]
  • U-Pb Geochronology and the Calibration of Metazoan Evolution: Progress and Promise
    Eleventh Annual V. M. Goldschmidt Conference (2001) 3867.pdf U-PB GEOCHRONOLOGY AND THE CALIBRATION OF METAZOAN EVOLUTION: PROGRESS AND PROMISE. S. A. Bowring, M. W. Martin, and J. P. Grotzinger. Intensive efforts by paleontologists, evolutionary and developmental biologists, and geologists are leading to a much better understanding of the first appearance and subsequent explosive diversification of animals. The recognition of thin zircon-bearing air-fall ash beds interlayered with fossil-bearing rocks has allowed the establishment of a high-precision temporal framework for animal evolution. Refined laboratory techniques permit analytical uncertainties that translate to age uncertainties of less than 1 Ma and the potential for global correlations at even higher resolution (100-300 ka) when combined with integrated paleontological, chemostratigraphic, and geological data. This framework, will allow evaluation of models that invoke both intrinsic and extrinsic triggers for Metazoan evolution and the Cambrian radiation. In particular, many have pointed out that the first appearance of metazoan fossils follows a period characterized by dramatic climate fluctuations and large fluctuations in the sequestration of carbon. The oldest dated Metazoan fossils (Ediacarans) are younger than ca. 575 Ma and appear to just post-date the youngest Neoproterozoic glacial deposits ca. 580 Ma. The Doushantuo phosphatic rocks of south China preserve spectacular animal fossils but have not been precisely dated. Geochronological data from Neoproterozoic to Cambrian rocks in North America, Namibia, Great Britain, Siberia, and Oman indicate that Ediacaran fossils range from at least 575 Ma (Newfoundland) to <543 Ma (Namibia). Shelly fossils (Cloudina and Namacalathus) are > 548 to ca. 542 Ma. Complex trace-fossils occur at least as far back as 555 Ma (White Sea, Russia).
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Independent Histories of the Human Y Chromosome and the Human Mitochondrial Chromosome
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 8 Print Reference: Pages 133-151 Article 7 2018 An Overview of the Independent Histories of the Human Y Chromosome and the Human Mitochondrial chromosome Robert W. Carter Stephen Lee University of Idaho John C. Sanford Cornell University, Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences School of Integrative Plant Science,Follow this Plant and Biology additional Section works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Carter, R.W., S.S. Lee, and J.C. Sanford. An overview of the independent histories of the human Y- chromosome and the human mitochondrial chromosome. 2018. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 133–151. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Carter, R.W., S.S. Lee, and J.C. Sanford. An overview of the independent histories of the human Y-chromosome and the human mitochondrial chromosome. 2018. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Clocks Fossil Evidence Is Sparse and Imprecise Rose Hoberman (Or Nonexistent)
    The Holy Grail Molecular Clocks Fossil evidence is sparse and imprecise Rose Hoberman (or nonexistent) Predict divergence times by comparing molecular data Rate Constancy? •Given 110 MYA – a phylogenetic tree – branch lengths (rt) – a time estimate for one (or more) node C D R M H • Can we date other nodes in the tree? • Yes... if the rate of molecular change is constant across all branches Page & Holmes p240 Protein Variability Evidence for Rate Constancy in Hemoglobin • Protein structures & functions differ – Proportion of neutral sites differ • Rate constancy does not hold across different protein types Large carniverous marsupial • However... – Each protein does appear to have a characteristic rate of evolution Page and Holmes p229 1 The Outline Molecular Clock • Methods for estimating time under a molecular Hypothesis clock – Estimating genetic distance • Amount of genetic difference between – Determining and using calibration points sequences is a function of time since – Sources of error separation. • Rate heterogeneity – reasons for variation • Rate of molecular change is constant – how its taken into account when estimating times (enough) to predict times of divergence • Reliability of time estimates • Estimating gene duplication times Measuring Evolutionary time with a Estimating Genetic Differences molecular clock 1. Estimate genetic distance If all nt equally likely, observed difference d = number amino acid replacements would plateau at 0.75 2. Use paleontological data to determine date of common ancestor Simply counting
    [Show full text]
  • Aspen Ecology in Rocky Mountain National Park: Age Distribution, Genetics, and the Effects of Elk Herbivory
    Aspen Ecology in Rocky Mountain National Park: Age Distribution, Genetics, and the Effects of Elk Herbivory By Linda C. Zeigenfuss, Dan Binkley, Gerald A. Tuskan, William H. Romme, Tongming Yin, Stephen DiFazio, and Francis J. Singer Open-File Report 2008–1337 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Zeigenfuss, L.C., Binkley, D., Tuskan, G.A., Romme, W.H., Yin, T., DiFazio, S., and Singer, F.J. 2008, Aspen Ecology in Rocky Mountain National Park: Age distribution, genetics, and the effects of elk herbivory: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1337, 52 p. Available online only Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Cover photo courtesy of Carolyn Widman ii Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • MOLECULAR CLOCKS Definition Introduction
    MOLECULAR CLOCKS 583 Kishino, H., Thorne, J. L., and Bruno, W. J., 2001. Performance of Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H., and Painter, I. S., 1998. Estimating the a divergence time estimation method under a probabilistic model rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. Molecular of rate evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18,352–361. Biology and Evolution, 15, 1647–1657. Kodandaramaiah, U., 2011. Tectonic calibrations in molecular dat- Warnock, R. C. M., Yang, Z., Donoghue, P. C. J., 2012. Exploring ing. Current Zoology, 57,116–124. uncertainty in the calibration of the molecular clock. Biology Marshall, C. R., 1997. Confidence intervals on stratigraphic ranges Letters, 8, 156–159. with nonrandom distributions of fossil horizons. Paleobiology, Wilkinson, R. D., Steiper, M. E., Soligo, C., Martin, R. D., Yang, Z., 23, 165–173. and Tavaré, S., 2011. Dating primate divergences through an Müller, J., and Reisz, R. R., 2005. Four well-constrained calibration integrated analysis of palaeontological and molecular data. Sys- points from the vertebrate fossil record for molecular clock esti- tematic Biology, 60,16–31. mates. Bioessays, 27, 1069–1075. Yang, Z., and Rannala, B., 2006. Bayesian estimation of species Parham, J. F., Donoghue, P. C. J., Bell, C. J., et al., 2012. Best practices divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil for justifying fossil calibrations. Systematic Biology, 61,346–359. calibrations with soft bounds. Molecular Biology and Evolution, Peters, S. E., 2005. Geologic constraints on the macroevolutionary 23, 212–226. history of marine animals. Proceedings of the National Academy Zuckerkandl, E., and Pauling, L., 1962. Molecular disease, evolution of Sciences, 102, 12326–12331.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Primate Evolution
    8. Primate Evolution Jonathan M. G. Perry, Ph.D., The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Stephanie L. Canington, B.A., The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Learning Objectives • Understand the major trends in primate evolution from the origin of primates to the origin of our own species • Learn about primate adaptations and how they characterize major primate groups • Discuss the kinds of evidence that anthropologists use to find out how extinct primates are related to each other and to living primates • Recognize how the changing geography and climate of Earth have influenced where and when primates have thrived or gone extinct The first fifty million years of primate evolution was a series of adaptive radiations leading to the diversification of the earliest lemurs, monkeys, and apes. The primate story begins in the canopy and understory of conifer-dominated forests, with our small, furtive ancestors subsisting at night, beneath the notice of day-active dinosaurs. From the archaic plesiadapiforms (archaic primates) to the earliest groups of true primates (euprimates), the origin of our own order is characterized by the struggle for new food sources and microhabitats in the arboreal setting. Climate change forced major extinctions as the northern continents became increasingly dry, cold, and seasonal and as tropical rainforests gave way to deciduous forests, woodlands, and eventually grasslands. Lemurs, lorises, and tarsiers—once diverse groups containing many species—became rare, except for lemurs in Madagascar where there were no anthropoid competitors and perhaps few predators. Meanwhile, anthropoids (monkeys and apes) emerged in the Old World, then dispersed across parts of the northern hemisphere, Africa, and ultimately South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudotsuga Menziesii)
    120 - PART 1. CONSENSUS DOCUMENTS ON BIOLOGY OF TREES Section 4. Douglas-Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 1. Taxonomy Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco is generally called Douglas-fir (so spelled to maintain its distinction from true firs, the genus Abies). Pseudotsuga Carrière is in the kingdom Plantae, division Pinophyta (traditionally Coniferophyta), class Pinopsida, order Pinales (conifers), and family Pinaceae. The genus Pseudotsuga is most closely related to Larix (larches), as indicated in particular by cone morphology and nuclear, mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA phylogenies (Silen 1978; Wang et al. 2000); both genera also have non-saccate pollen (Owens et al. 1981, 1994). Based on a molecular clock analysis, Larix and Pseudotsuga are estimated to have diverged more than 65 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous to Paleocene (Wang et al. 2000). The earliest known fossil of Pseudotsuga dates from 32 Mya in the Early Oligocene (Schorn and Thompson 1998). Pseudostuga is generally considered to comprise two species native to North America, the widespread Pseudostuga menziesii and the southwestern California endemic P. macrocarpa (Vasey) Mayr (bigcone Douglas-fir), and in eastern Asia comprises three or fewer endemic species in China (Fu et al. 1999) and another in Japan. The taxonomy within the genus is not yet settled, and more species have been described (Farjon 1990). All reported taxa except P. menziesii have a karyotype of 2n = 24, the usual diploid number of chromosomes in Pinaceae, whereas the P. menziesii karyotype is unique with 2n = 26. The two North American species are vegetatively rather similar, but differ markedly in the size of their seeds and seed cones, the latter 4-10 cm long for P.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Primates
    AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education Page 1 of 16 www.accessscience.com Fossil primates Contributed by: Eric Delson Publication year: 2014 Extinct members of the order of mammals to which humans belong. All current classifications divide the living primates into two major groups (suborders): the Strepsirhini or “lower” primates (lemurs, lorises, and bushbabies) and the Haplorhini or “higher” primates [tarsiers and anthropoids (New and Old World monkeys, greater and lesser apes, and humans)]. Some fossil groups (omomyiforms and adapiforms) can be placed with or near these two extant groupings; however, there is contention whether the Plesiadapiformes represent the earliest relatives of primates and are best placed within the order (as here) or outside it. See also: FOSSIL; MAMMALIA; PHYLOGENY; PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY; PRIMATES. Vast evidence suggests that the order Primates is a monophyletic group, that is, the primates have a common genetic origin. Although several peculiarities of the primate bauplan (body plan) appear to be inherited from an inferred common ancestor, it seems that the order as a whole is characterized by showing a variety of parallel adaptations in different groups to a predominantly arboreal lifestyle, including anatomical and behavioral complexes related to improved grasping and manipulative capacities, a variety of locomotor styles, and enlargement of the higher centers of the brain. Among the extant primates, the lower primates more closely resemble forms that evolved relatively early in the history of the order, whereas the higher primates represent a group that evolved more recently (Fig. 1). A classification of the primates, as accepted here, appears above. Early primates The earliest primates are placed in their own semiorder, Plesiadapiformes (as contrasted with the semiorder Euprimates for all living forms), because they have no direct evolutionary links with, and bear few adaptive resemblances to, any group of living primates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Platyrrhine Talus: a Comparative Analysis of the Phenetic Affinities of the Miocene Platyrrhines with Their Modern Relatives
    Journal of Human Evolution 111 (2017) 179e201 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol The evolution of the platyrrhine talus: A comparative analysis of the phenetic affinities of the Miocene platyrrhines with their modern relatives * Thomas A. Püschel a, , Justin T. Gladman b, c,Rene Bobe d, e, William I. Sellers a a School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom b Department of Anthropology, The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, NY, USA c NYCEP, New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, NY, USA d Departamento de Antropología, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile e Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, School of Anthropology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: Platyrrhines are a diverse group of primates that presently occupy a broad range of tropical-equatorial Received 8 August 2016 environments in the Americas. However, most of the fossil platyrrhine species of the early Miocene Accepted 26 July 2017 have been found at middle and high latitudes. Although the fossil record of New World monkeys has Available online 29 August 2017 improved considerably over the past several years, it is still difficult to trace the origin of major modern clades. One of the most commonly preserved anatomical structures of early platyrrhines is the talus. Keywords: This work provides an analysis of the phenetic affinities of extant platyrrhine tali and their Miocene New World monkeys counterparts through geometric morphometrics and a series of phylogenetic comparative analyses. Talar morphology fi Geometric morphometrics Geometric morphometrics was used to quantify talar shape af nities, while locomotor mode per- Locomotor mode percentages centages (LMPs) were used to test if talar shape is associated with locomotion.
    [Show full text]
  • First North American Fossil Monkey and Early Miocene Tropical Biotic Interchange Jonathan I
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature17415 First North American fossil monkey and early Miocene tropical biotic interchange Jonathan I. Bloch1, Emily D. Woodruff1,2, Aaron R. Wood1,3, Aldo F. Rincon1,4, Arianna R. Harrington1,2,5, Gary S. Morgan6, David A. Foster4, Camilo Montes7, Carlos A. Jaramillo8, Nathan A. Jud1, Douglas S. Jones1 & Bruce J. MacFadden1 New World monkeys (platyrrhines) are a diverse part of modern Primates Linnaeus, 1758 tropical ecosystems in North and South America, yet their early Anthropoidea Mivart, 1864 evolutionary history in the tropics is largely unknown. Molecular Platyrrhini Geoffroy, 1812 divergence estimates suggest that primates arrived in tropical Cebidae Bonaparte, 1831 Central America, the southern-most extent of the North American Panamacebus transitus gen. et sp. nov. landmass, with several dispersals from South America starting with the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama 3–4 million years Etymology. Generic name combines ‘Panama’ with ‘Cebus’, root taxon ago (Ma)1. The complete absence of primate fossils from Central for Cebidae. Specific name ‘transit’ (Latin, crossing) refers to its implied America has, however, limited our understanding of their history early Miocene dispersal between South and North America. in the New World. Here we present the first description of a fossil Holotype. UF 280128, left upper first molar (M1; Fig. 2a, b). monkey recovered from the North American landmass, the oldest Referred material. Left upper second molar (M2; UF 281001; Fig. 2a, b), known crown platyrrhine, from a precisely dated 20.9-Ma layer in partial left lower first incisor (I1; UF 280130), right lower second the Las Cascadas Formation in the Panama Canal Basin, Panama.
    [Show full text]