DOCSLIB.ORG

Geomydoecus Oregonus</Emphasis>

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geomydoecus Oregonus</Emphasis> Oecologia (Berl.) 15, 287--304 (1974) by Springer-Verlag 1974 The Population Dynamics and Host Utilization of Geomydoecus oregonus, a Parasite of Thomomys bottae R. W. Rust Department of Entomology and Applied Ecology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19711 Received January 28, 1974 Summary. This study treats the population dynamics and host utilization of Geomydoecus oregonus Price and Emerson, a mallophagan parasite of the pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae (Eydous and Gervais). Over 135000 lice were collected from 393 gophers over a period of 20 months. Average infestation on all gophers was 357 lice. Bimonthly mean densities showed an increase in June-July of both years, and these data were statistically different from the rest. Population age structure remained relatively constant in time with 9.3% females, 7.2% males, 47.4% nymphs and 36.1% eggs. Sex-age class separation of the gophers showed juveniles of both sexes to average 86 lice; subadult males averaged 210 lice; adult males averaged 544 lice; subadult and adult females averaged 255 and 296 lice, respectively. Lice were not randomly distributed on the gopher, but were most numerous on the head and anterior dorsal body. Lice eggs were restricted to hairs around the ears and eyes of the host. Over 80% of the animals sampled had eggs restricted to that region. Embryonic development and eelosion of G. oregonus proceeded over a wide range of environmental parameters. Over 80% of the ova tested survived and hatched in conditions between 33 ~ and 37~ and 22 % and 84 % relative humidity. The greatest survival was 98% at 35~ 75% R. H. and in a 3% COs atmosphere. The generation time of G. oregonus was 40• days. Duration of embryogenesis and nymphal stadia approximated 10• days for each. Adult lice lived 30-t- days on gophers. Age frequency mortalities were calculated as 0.02 for eggs, 0.18, 0.24, and 0.06 for nymphal instars and 0.50 for adult lice. This indicates a Type II survivorship curve. There was a direct linear relationship between the number of female lice on a gopher and the number of lice eggs. The average number of eggs per female was four. Using the pivotal frequency for reproduetives, it was possible to calculate R o for the louse at 1.272. Thus, r was equal to 0.24 per generation or 0.006 per day, and the population doubles in 2.8 generations. Speculations regarding population regulation are also included. Introduction The relationshi p between an ectoparasite and its host is governed by a complex set of interacting biotic and abiotie parameters. For the ecto- 1913 Oecologia(Bet1.), Vol. 10 288 R.W. Rust parasite, the biotic parameters are in general related to or originate from the host. The degree of adaptation of the parasite to the biotic parameters corresponds to the host specificity of the parasite. The degree of host specificity also indicates the adaptations of the parasite to the abiotie parameters influencing the host. Mallophaga, biting lice, are host specific (Hopkins, 1949; Werneck, 1950), and the restriction of all life stages to the body of the host refines the specificity and adaptations of a louse to its host and host's environment (see Clay, 1949; Ash, 1960; Baum, 1968; Foster, 1969, for avian lice; Ewing, 1924; Hopkins, 1949; Waterhouse, 1953; Craufurd-Benson, 1941; Scott, 1952; Murray, 1957b-d, 1965; Hopkins and Chamberlain, 1969, for mammalian lice). For lice, the combination of interacting mortality factors and a species innate capacity for increase will determine the population level on a particular host. Evans and Smith (1952), in their classic demographic analysis of Pedi. culus humanus Linnaeus, were the first to study the reproductive poten- tials of an ectoparasite. Murray and Gordon (1969) modeled the popu- lation dynamics of Bovicola ovis (Linnaeus), a biting louse of sheep. They showed mathematically the development of the population from a low summer density to a winter high density. The genus Geomydoecus, parasites of the fossorial rodent family Geomyidae, possesses morphological adaptations not found in other trichodectid lice (Ewing, 1936). Degenerate adaptations as the absence of eyes and lack of abdominal spiracles and tergites might be a response to the altered conditions of the host's burrow environment (Kennerly, 1964; McNab, 1966; Darden, 1970), and specializations of the antennae and well-developed hair-groove could relate to life on the gopher. Re- cently, Price and Emerson (1971) studied Geomydoecus and found 45 taxa on 29 of the 36 species of gophers. Most gophers have only one louse species; exceptions were hosts with extensive geographical distributions. The relative accessibility, small size, and peculiar habitat of the host provide a system for analyzing a parasite's population dynamics. Thus, Geomydoecus oregonus Price and Emerson, a parasite of Thomomys bottae (Eydoux and Gervais), was selected for analysis and interpretation. Methods and Materials Field A minimum of 20 pocket gophers per month as live-trapped from two irrigated alfaHa fields located on the University of California, Davis Farm, and 2 consecutive months of collection data were combined for analysis. The field sizes, agricultural practices, measurement of environmental parameters, gopher collecting and labora- tory handling techniques and parasite recovery methods are treated in Rust (1973a, b). Three age classes were established for both sexes of gophers: juvenile, subadult and adult. Separation was based on reproductive condition, skull features, and body Population Dynamics of the Gopher Louse 289 measurements (Miller, 1946, 1962; Hansen, 1960; Thaeler, 1968). Juveniles had the following sutures unfused: parietal-squamosal, maxilla-alisphenoid, and alisphenoid- squamosal; the dorsal surface of the maxilla (in the zygomatic arch) and palatine showed distinct porosity. Juveniles had gray pelage and were still in association with their mother, as determined from trapping. Subadults had partial fusion of the cranial sutures, reduced porosity and brownish pelage. Subadult females had a closed pubic symphysis and limited follicular development; subadult male testes were only 3-6 mm long. Adults had skull sutures and nonporous bones. Adult females had the pubic symphysis open, placental scars, embryos, or were lactating. Adult males had testes from 7-15 mm long. Body length and maximum skull length and width showed overlap due to a continuous breeding population (Miller, 1946) but were also used in the separation. Time for the age categories would be approximately one and one-half to two months for juveniles, 2-5 months for subadults and the mean length of life for adult gophers has been estimated by Howard and Childs (1959) as 7.6 months for males and 12.3 months for females. Laboratory Eelosion and first instar survival in vitro were examined under various environ- mental conditions. 8 different temperatures (27-41~ were maintained in Percival environmental chambers. The chambers were set for total darkness with the photophase only when eggs or nymphs were checked. Eight different relative humidities (10-96%)were maintained in liter desiccator jars containing various saturated salt solutions (Winston and Bates, 1960). Eclosion was tested in normal air and a 3% COz atmosphere. The high CO 2 atmosphere was created by removing 3 % of the gas volume from the jars and replacing it with CO 2. The CO 2 concentration was measured with a Unieo Gas Analyzer. Four replicates of 25 eggs each were tested at 64 different temperature-relative humidity combinations. Translucent eggs were plucked individually from gophers for the temperature-relative humidity tests. Eclosion and nymphal survival in 3% CO 2 atmosphere were recorded at 33 ~ and 35~ both at 62%, 75% and 84% R. It. Nymphal survival was also checked in normal CO 2 atmosphere. The duration of embryonic development was obtained by allowing female lice to oviposit in small petri dishes. This gave eggs of a known age (-4-12 h), and these eggs were placed in separate containers in various temperature-relative humidity conditions. Louse survival on the host was checked in a normal CO 2 atmosphere at various humidities. Humidities tested were 35 % • 5, 50 % =J:5, 75 % • 5 and 100 % -- 2 and were maintained in environmental chambers at 21~1771. Louse demography was studied (in rive) in an artificial burrow system simulat- ing natural conditions (Darden, 1970). Four artificial burrows were housed in adjoining chambers in a soil box (60.9 X 91.4 X 121.9 cm). Burrows were constructed of 7 • 7 mm hardware cloth welded together. A system consisted of an above ground holding cage (14.2 • 20.3 X 30.4 ore), an initial diagonal tunnel (30 cm), a horizontal tunnel (24 cm) and a nest chamber (19x24 era). The tunnels were 7.5 cm in dia- meter. Before an animal was placed in a burrow system, carrot pieces and fresh alfalfa were placed in the next chamber. The system was packed with soil and buried in the soil box, with 25 to 30 em of soil over the nest chamber. The surface was moistened with approximately 2 1 of water and allowed to stand for 24 h before a gopher was introduced. Additional fresh alfalfa was provided daily. Two Plexiglas tubes (6 mm O. D.) were attached to the roof of the nest chamber and horizontal tunnel. Both gas samples and temperatures were measured via the tubes. The entire system was housed in a greenhouse with a regime of controlled temperature and 290 R.W. Rus~ natural light. Every seventh day of an experiment an additional 21 of water were added to the surface. Two different treatments were designed for gophers placed in the artificial system. Newly eclosed first instar nymphs were introduced on a clean gopher, and the animal was released in a system for a set period--6, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genetic Variation Within a Broadly Distributed Chewing Louse Genus (Thomomydoecus)
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Honors Program Theses Honors Program 2020 Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2020 Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Bruns, Clarissa Elizabeth, "Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus)" (2020). Honors Program Theses. 433. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt/433 This Open Access Honors Program Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENETIC VARIATION WITHIN A BROADLY DISTRIBUTED CHEWING LOUSE GENUS (THOMOMYDOECUS) A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Designation University Honors with Distinction Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa May 2020 This Study by: Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Entitled: Genetic distribution within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) has been approved as meeting the thesis or project requirement for the Designation University Honors with Distinction ________ ______________________________________________________ Date James Demastes, Honors Thesis Advisor, Biology ________ ______________________________________________________ Date Dr. Jessica Moon, Director, University Honors Program Abstract No broad study has been conducted to examine the genetics of Thomomydoecus species and their patterns of geographic variation. Chewing lice and their parasite-host relationships with pocket gophers have been studied as a key example of cophylogeny (Demastes et al., 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mallophaga of New England Birds James Edward Keirans Jr
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1966 THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS JAMES EDWARD KEIRANS JR. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation KEIRANS, JAMES EDWARD JR., "THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS" (1966). Doctoral Dissertations. 834. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/834 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67—163 KEIRANS, Jr., James Edward, 1935— THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS. University of New Hampshire, Ph.D., 1966 E n tom ology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS BY JAMES E.° KEIRANS, -TK - A. B,, Boston University, i960 A. M., Boston University, 19^3 A THESIS Submitted to The University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School Department of Zoology June, 1966 This thesis has been examined and approved. May 12i 1966 Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to express my thanks to Dr. James G. Conklin, Chairman, Department of Entomology and chairman of my doctoral committee, for his guidance during the course of these studies and for permission to use the facilities of the Entomology Department. My grateful thanks go to Dr. Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds
    c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Mallophaga of North America (North of Mexico), Which Reflects the Taxonomic Studies Published Since That Date
    The Genera and Species of the Mallophaga of North America (North of Mexico). Part I Suborder ISCHNOCERA by K. C. Emerson, PhD DEFENSE PEST MGMT INFO ANALYSIS CTR AFPMB, FOREST GLEN SECTION, WRAMC WASHINGTON, DC 20307-5001 ,PREFACE This volume is essentially a revision of my 1964 publication. Checklist of the Mallophaga of North America (north of Mexico), which reflects the taxonomic studies published since that date. Host criteria for the birds has been expanded to include consideration of all species listed in The A. 0. U. Check- list of North American Birds, Fifth Edition (1957)~A few species of birds definitely known to be extinct are omitted for the listings of probable hosts, even though new species may still be found on museum skins. Mammal hosts considered remain those Irecorded in Miller and Kellogg, List of North American Recent Mammals (1955), as being found north of Mexico. If the present volume of taxonomic studies of Mallophaga continues, another revision will be necessary in a few years. Much remains to be done on the taxonomy of several genera and host groups, especially the forms found on the Passeriformes . CONTENTS PHILOPTERIDAE Acidoproctus Acutifrons Anaticola Anatoecus Aquanirmus Ardeicola Brueelia Campanulotes Carduiceps Chelopistes Cirrophthirius Colinicola Coloceras Columbicol.a Craspedonirmus Craspedorrhyncbus Cuclotogaster Cuculicola Cuculoecus Cummingsiella Degeeriella Docophoroides Episbates Esthiopterum Falcolipeurus Fulicoffula Goniocotes Goniodes Haffneria Halipeurus Harrisoniella Ibidoecus Incidifrons Lagopoecus
    [Show full text]
  • Lice in My Life
    LICE IN MY LIFE K. C. EMERSON 1979 LICE IN MY LIFE by K. C. Emerson, Ph.D. 2704 North Kensington Street Arlington, Virginia 22207 Research Associate U. S. N. M., Smithsonian Institution Research Associate The K. C. Emerson Entomology Museum Oklahoma State University Collaborator United States Department of Agriculture Copyright 1979 by Dr. Kary Cadmus Emerson All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Why 3 Early history of research on lice 6 The changes begin 12 The new era in lice taxonomy 20 The past twenty years 29 Status of research on lice 44 The Anoplura Collection in the U.S.N.M. 59 The Mallophaga Collection in the U.S.N.M. 64 Medical Entomology and the Armed Forces 71 Ectoparasites in the K. C. Emerson Entomology Museum 77 Acknowledgments 80 Bibliography of entomology papers 86 All men of whatever quality they may be, who have done anything of excellence, or which may properly resemble excellence, ought, if they are persons of truth and honesty, to describe their life with their own hands. Benvenuto Cellini about 500 years ago INTRODUCTION For more than 40 years, working with lice (Mallophaga and Anoplura) has been one of the great pleasures of my life. My research has been interesting. It has been a pleasure to assist others under- stand the taxonomy, ecology and distribution of lice so that they can share my interest and then conduct research on their own. I have been able to provide good collections to The K. C. Emerson Entomology Museum at Oklahoma State University so that students there will not have to spend time in Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ectoparasites of Geomys Bursarius Illinoensis Rick L
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1986 Ectoparasites of Geomys Bursarius Illinoensis Rick L. Miller Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Zoology at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Miller, Rick L., "Ectoparasites of Geomys Bursarius Illinoensis" (1986). Masters Theses. 2639. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2639 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidates who have written formal theses. SUBJECT: Permission to reproduc:e theses. The University Library is receiving a number of requests from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow theses to be copied. Please sign one of the following statements: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that institution's library or research holding-s. Date Author I respectfully request Booth Library of Eastern Illinois Unive.rsity not allow my thesis be reproduced because �--�� Date Author m ECTOPARASITES OF GEOMYS BURSARIUS ILLINOENSIS (TITLE) BY Rick L. Mi 11 er THESIS SUBMITIED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 1986 YEAR I HEREBY RECOMMENI;) THIS THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE GRADUATE DEGREE CITED ABOVE Tabl e of Contents Page Abstract i.
    [Show full text]
  • Brueelia Amandavae</Emphasis>
    Biologia, Bratislava, 62/4: 458—461, 2007 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-007-0088-2 Intrinsic rate of natural increase of Brueelia amandavae (Ischnocera, Phthiraptera) populations infesting Indian red avadavat Nidhi Gupta, Sandeep Kumar &ArunKumarSaxena* Department of Zoology, Government Raza Postgraduate College, Rampur (U.P.)-244901,India; e-mail: akscsir@rediffmail.com Abstract: The incubation period of eggs, duration of three nymphal instars, adult longevity and the daily egg-deposition rate of the ischnoceran Phthiraptera, Brueelia amandavae, were determined by rearing the louse in vitro (35 ± 1 ◦C, 75–82% RH, feather diet). The data obtained were utilized for life table construction and determination of the intrinsic rate of natural increase (0.031 per day) and the doubling time (23.45 days) of the louse population. The doubling time of the louse in in vivo experiments was 21.5 days. Key words: Phthiraptera; biology; life cycle Introduction culture vial was covered with muslin cloth and tied with a rubber band. The culture vials were then transferred to a The intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm)ofavian 1000 ml battery jar/desiccator. Relative humidity was reg- lice populations deserves investigation. Attempts to de- ulated in the desiccator/battery jar by placing 100 ml of termine the values of rm of two mammalian lice, the a saturated salt solution as described by Winston & Bates sheep louse Bovicola ovis Schrank, 1781 and the rodent (1960). The desiccator/battery jar was then placed in an in- cubator (fitted with digital temperature indicator cum con- louse Geomydoecus oregonus Price et Emerson, 1971, troller)/B.O.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Host Relationships of the Trichodectidae
    TAXONOMY, PHYLOGENY AND HOST RELATIONSHIPS OF THE TRICHODECTIDAE (PHTHIRAPTERA: ISCHITOCERA) by CHRISTOPHER HENRY GOUTTS LYAL, B.Sc. VOLUME 1 October 1983 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and for the Diploma of Imperial College, Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College, London SN7 and Department of Entomology, British Museum (Natural History), London SM7 2 ABSTRACT The external morphology of the Phthiraptera is discussed with particular reference to the Trichodectidae. Structures of the head, thorax and abdomen are examined and homologised, most attention being given to features of potential use in systematic analysis. The homologies of the component parts of the male and female genitalia, hitherto disputed, are established. The characters used by previous workers for systematic placement of the Trichodectidae, Ischnocera, Amblycera, Rhyncophthirina, Anoplura, Phthiraptera and Psocoptera are examined, and a cladistic analysis of these groups performed. The Psocodea and Phthiraptera are found to be holophyletic but the Psocoptera are paraphyletic. The Trichodectidae, Amblycera, Rhyncophthirina and Anoplura are all holophyletic, the Rhynco- phthirina is the sister-group of the Anoplura and the Amblycera the sister-group of all other lice. The Ischnocera is not demonstrably holophyletic, and the exact placement of the Trichodectidae is not determined. A cladistic analysis of the Trichodectidae is performed and the 351 species and subspecies reclassified on the basis of this. Five subfamilies are used to partition the twenty genera employed, ten of the latter being sub-divided into twenty-seven subgenera. One subfamily, three genera and four subgenera are described as new. Three genera are placed in synonymy, eight genera and subgenera are raised from synonymy, and four genera are reduced to subgenera,.
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Parasite Associations of the Cratogeomys Fumosus Species Group and Their Chewing Lice, Geomydoecus Alex Popinga, James W
    www.mastozoologiamexicana.org La Portada Colonia reproductiva de lobos marino (Zalopus californicus) en la costa del Pacífico de la isla Margarita, Baja California Sur. Se observa como el macho del grupo vigila y se coloca entre los extraños al grupo y las hembras con crías (Fotografía Sergio Ticul Álvarez Castañeda). Nuestro logo “Ozomatli” El nombre de “Ozomatli” proviene del náhuatl se refiere al símbolo astrológico del mono en el calendario azteca, así como al dios de la danza y del fuego. Se relaciona con la alegría, la danza, el canto, las habilidades. Al signo decimoprimero en la cosmogonía mexica. “Ozomatli” es una representación pictórica de los mono arañas (Ateles geoffroyi). La especie de primate de más amplia distribución en México. “ Es habitante de los bosques, sobre todo de los que están por donde sale el sol en Anáhuac. Tiene el dorso pequeño, es barrigudo y su cola, que a veces se enrosca, es larga. Sus manos y sus pies parecen de hombre; también sus uñas. Los Ozomatin gritan y silban y hacen visajes a la gente. Arrojan piedras y palos. Su cara es casi como la de una persona, pero tienen mucho pelo.” THERYA Volumen 10, número 2 mayo 2019 EDITORIAL The holistic specimen and parasites of mammals Jesús A. Fernández. 65 ARTICLES Detection of Bartonella and Rickettsia in small mammals and their Contenido ectoparasites in México Sokani Sánchez-Montes, Martín Yair Cabrera-Garrido, César A. Ríos-Muñoz, Ali Zeltzin Lira-Olguin; Roxana Acosta-Gutiérrez, Mario Mata-Galindo, Kevin Hernández-Vilchis, D. Melissa Navarrete-Sotelo, Pablo Colunga-Salas, Livia León-Paniagua and Ingeborg Becker.
    [Show full text]
  • Cophylogeny and Disparate Rates of Evolution in Sympatric Lineages of Chewing Lice on Pocket Gophers
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution xxx (2007) xxx–xxx www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Cophylogeny and disparate rates of evolution in sympatric lineages of chewing lice on pocket gophers Jessica E. Light *, Mark S. Hafner Department of Biological Sciences and Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA Received 23 March 2007; revised 20 August 2007; accepted 4 September 2007 Abstract Although molecular-based phylogenetic studies of hosts and parasites are increasingly common in the literature, no study to date has examined two congeneric lineages of parasites that live in sympatry on the same lineage of hosts. This study examines phylogenetic rela- tionships among chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Trichodectidae) of the Geomydoecus coronadoi and Geomydoecus mexicanus species com- plexes and compares these to phylogenetic patterns in their hosts (pocket gophers of the rodent family Geomyidae). Sympatry of congeneric lice provides a natural experiment to test the hypothesis that closely related lineages of parasites will respond similarly to the same host. Sequence data from the mitochondrial COI and the nuclear EF-1a genes confirm that the two louse complexes are recip- rocally monophyletic and that individual clades within each species complex parasitize a different species of pocket gopher. Phylogenetic comparisons reveal that both louse complexes show a significant pattern of cophylogeny with their hosts. Comparisons of rates of nucle- otide substitution at 4-fold degenerate sites in the COI gene indicate that both groups of lice have significantly higher basal mutation rates than their hosts. The two groups of lice have similar basal rates of mutation, but lice of the G.
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Parasite Associations of the Cratogeomys Fumosus Species Group and Their Chewing Lice, Geomydoecus
    THERYA, 2019, Vol. 10 (2): 81-89 DOI: 10.12933/therya-19-739 ISSN 2007-3364 Host-parasite associations of the Cratogeomys fumosus species group and their chewing lice, Geomydoecus ALEX POPINGA1, 2, JAMES W. DEMASTES1*, THERESA A. SPRADLING1, DAVID J. HAFNER3, AND MARK S. HAFNER4 1 Department of Biology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0421. Email: [email protected] (ANP), [email protected] (JWD), [email protected] (TAS). 2 Present address: Department of Physics and Department of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 1010. 3 Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. Email: [email protected] (DJH). 4 Museum of Natural Science and Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA. Email: [email protected] (MSH). *Correspondence Chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Trichodectidae) and the pocket gophers (Rodentia: Geomyidae) that they inhabit have shared an intimate his- torical association that has made them a textbook study for cophylogeny. Herein, we examine the chewing lice found on pocket gophers of the Cratogeomys fumosus species group using DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene to determine relationships among lice for comparison to published host phylogeny. Although matrix approaches indicate a correlation between host and parasite genetic distances, cophylogenetic reconstruction methods fail to detect a pattern of widespread cophylogeny. In conclusion, this study provides an exception to the rule of host-parasite cophylogeny that could be the result of the young age of the relationships considered herein and the complex history of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt.
    [Show full text]