Viktorija RUSINAIT BELARUSIAN POLITICAL NOMADISM
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY Viktorija RUSINAIT BELARUSIAN POLITICAL NOMADISM Doctoral dissertation Social sciences, political sciences (02 S) Kaunas, 2017 1 UDK 323.2(476) Ru-142 Dissertation was prepared at Vytautas Magnus University during 2011-2017. Research supervisors: Prof. dr. Gintautas Mažeikis (Vytautas Magnus University, Social sciences, Political sciences, 02 S) – 2013-2017. Doc. dr. Egl Butkeviien (Kaunas University of Technology, Social sciences, Sociology 05 S) – 2011-2013. Scientific consultant: Prof. Ph.D. Francesco Privitera (University of Bologna, Social sciences, Political sciences 02 S) ISBN 978-609-467-312-2 2 VYTAUTO DIDŽIOJO UNIVERSITETAS Viktorija RUSINAIT BALTARUSIŠKAS POLITINIS NOMADIŠKUMAS Mokslo daktaro disertacija Socialiniai mokslai, politikos mokslai (02 S) Kaunas, 2017 3 Disertacija rengta 2011-2017 metais Vytauto Didžiojo universitete. Moksliniai vadovai: Prof. dr. Gintautas Mažeikis (Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, socialiniai mokslai, politikos mokslai, 02 S) – 2013-2017. Doc. dr. Egl Butkeviien (Kauno technologijos universitetas, socialiniai mokslai, sociologija 05 S) – 2011-2013. Mokslinis konsultantas: Prof. Ph.D. Francesco Privitera (Bolonijos universitetas, Italija, socialiniai mokslai, politikos mokslai, 02 S). 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES, TABLES AND PICTURES ..................................................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 9 1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR RESEARCHING BELARUSIAN POLITICAL NOMADISM ............................................. 20 1.1 Post-structuralist Concepts for Understanding and Interpreting Belarusian Political Nomadism ................................................................................................................................ 20 1.2 Strategies, Methods and Instruments for Researching Belarusian Political Nomadism 34 2 SOURCES OF BELARUSIAN POLITICAL NOMADISM.......................................... 53 2.1 Police Rule in Belarus: Obstructing the Development of Civil Society ...................... 53 2.2 Belarusian Political Nomadism in the Context of Transnational Civil Society ........... 83 2.3 From Belarusian Identity to Belarusian Subjectivity ................................................... 96 3 CASE STUDY: BELARUSIAN POLITICAL NOMADS IN LITHUANIA .............. 110 3.1 Exploring Transnational Subjectivities ...................................................................... 110 3.2 The Police: Unspoken Laws for the Political Nomad ................................................ 121 3.3 The Political: Migrating Belarusian Civil Society and their Nomadic Strategies ..... 131 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................... 146 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................... 150 5 FIGURES, TABLES AND PICTURES Figure 1. Belarusians’ choices, if there were a referendum on Belarus joining the EU .............. 62 Figure 2. Belarusians’ choices, if a referendum on integration with Russia were held today ..... 62 Figure 3. Timeline of Russia-Belarus crises ................................................................................ 69 Figure 4. Number of registered civil society organisations in Belarus, 1998-2015 ..................... 75 Figure 5. Timeline of central events and most important bills hindering the development of civil society. ................................................................................................................................. 77 Figure 6. Refugees and asylum seekers from Belarus. ................................................................ 88 Figure 7. Instrumentalist understanding of identity. .................................................................. 106 Table 1. Research method selection ............................................................................................. 41 Table 2. Snowball sampling risks, and strategies to overcome them. .......................................... 46 Table 3. Corruption in Belarus ..................................................................................................... 60 Table 4. NGO activities by donor locations ................................................................................. 93 Table 5. Identity typology based on acquisition and usage ......................................................... 97 Picture 1. Druzhba pipelines in Belarus. ...................................................................................... 65 Picture 2. Major Russian gas pipelines to Europe ........................................................................ 66 Picture 3. Mapping closest personal relationships. .................................................................... 115 Picture 4. Mapping historical and mental proximities. .............................................................. 118 Picture 5. Mapping citizenship geographies. ............................................................................. 120 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would have not been possible without the help and support of many people. First, my supervisors. Gintautas, you have created the space for me to develop. I appreciate the freedom you have given me to grow as a researcher I want to be and the support you provided when needed. Francesco, thank you for the ongoing encouragement, mentorship and guidance throughout these years. Even thousands of kilometres away, your support gave me confidence whenever I was most in need of it to continue working, you have encouraged me to look deeper and work harder, to strive to be better. I sincerely thank you both. Jay Daniel Mininger, thank you for the opportunities to discuss my work with you, your support, feedback and excellent advice. Your on-point criticism helped me grow, leaving the space not to fix things, but to find my own approach. You are a truly great teacher. My readers Dionizas Litvaitis, Migl Bareikyt, Kanstantsin Lashkevich – thank you for the discussions, your suggestions to the draft and attention to detail. My thesis would not be as it is without your help. Thank you, Ales Herasimenka and Vital Byl for the interesting discussions and guidance in the Belarusian field. I wish you the best of luck in your own academic endeavours. Thank you, Kristina Jrait and Auks Balytien for showing interest in my work and support, Jurij Dobriakov for your help with Russian language and Laksiej Lavonyk for helping me to get started in my research. A very special gratitude goes out to all the research informants for dedicating your time, sharing your experiences, your thoughts and emotions. It inspired me all the way. Thank you, Anaïs Marin, Almira Ousmanova, Jurga Jonutyt, Rstis Kamuntaviius and Šarnas Liekis for agreeing to serve as the thesis defence committee members, your time dedicated for my work and your insights. I wish to thank CEU Summer University and IWM Summer School and all the colleagues I met there for opening up intellectual territories in communication policy, advocacy, political economy and history. I have benefited greatly from the library resources at the University of Bologna “R. Ruffili” Central Library in Forli, IWM Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna and Vilnius University 7 TSPMI Library in Vilnius. My gratitude goes to the Lithuanian Foundation for their financial support. Finally, my family: Dionizas Litvaitis, Freja Gama, Gina Rusinien, Zuzana Šimaitien and Jrat Bajarnien, thank you for your love, encouragement and invaluable support. This work would be impossible without you. 8 INTRODUCTION Research Background The European Union (EU) invests significant resources into bilateral cooperation between the EU and Belarus through its European Neighbourhood Policy framework, European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, Neighbourhood Programmes (Bosse and Korosteleva-Polglase 2009). From 2007 to 2014, through its European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument, the EU designated €94 million for assistance to Belarus, including €22.5 million for engagement with civil society, media and local authorities, including targeted scholarship programmes (European Commission, 2016). The vectors guiding these investments are the maintenance of a productive and safe neighbourhood, and democratisation. Despite these resources being allocated, and the recognition by the EU of the importance of freedom of speech, including political speech (Venice Commission, Council of Europe, 2011), significant barriers still exist to the functioning of civil society in Belarus. Human rights are continually undermined and disregarded (Amnesty International, 2013; UN Human Rights Council, 2014; Civil Society. Dialogue for Progress, 2014; Economic Commission for Europe, 2005; USAID, 2013) Although the constitution of the Republic of Belarus contains democratic provisions, such as respect for individuals’ rights and freedoms, the country’s authoritarian government creates and enforces obstacles including legal provisions, persecution, and lawsuits against public participation (Venice Commission, Council of Europe, 2011). An authentic and active third sector is one of the main pillars of a democratic society; in Belarus, NGOs and