DOCSLIB.ORG

Mosquitoes to Wolves

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mosquitoes to Wolves Mosquitoes to Wolves The Evolution of the Airborne Forward Air Controller GARY ROBERT LESTER Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 1997 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lester, Gary Robert, 1947– Mosquitoes to wolves : the evolution of the airborne forward air controller / Gary Robert Lester. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. 1. Close air support—History. 2. Close air support—Case studies. 3. Air war- fare—United States—History. I. Title. UG703.L47 1997 358.4¢142—dc21 97-18377 CIP Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii ABOUT THE AUTHOR . ix PREFACE . xi 1 EVOLUTION OF CLOSE AIR SUPPORT . 1 World War I . 2 Between the Wars . 5 The American Experience, 1918–42 . 7 World War II . 9 Notes . 12 2 CLOSE AIR SUPPORT DOCTRINE . 15 Early Navy-Marine Close Air Support . 15 Close Air Support in Korea . 16 Air Force Philosophy in Korea . 18 Navy/Marine Air in Vietnam . 22 Notes . 23 3 KOREA: FORWARD AIR CONTROLLERS EMERGE . 25 The Fight for Air Superiority . 26 Phase One—Retreat to Pusan . 28 Phase Two—Advance to the Yalu . 29 Phase Three—Second Retreat . 29 Phase Four—Main Line of Resistance Stabilized . 29 Phase Five—Air Pressure for Peace . 30 A Substitute for Artillery . 30 Close Air Support in Korea . 31 The Extemporized Air War . 32 The Need for Airborne FACs . 33 iii Chapter Page Command and Control Support . 37 6132d Tactical Air Control Group . 38 6147th Squadron Organized . 38 Immediate Air Requests . 40 Mosquitoes Assigned to Divisions . 40 Mosquito Mission Expands . 41 The 502d Tactical Control Group . 41 Notes . 43 4 MOSQUITO OPERATIONS IN KOREA . 45 The Role of the Mosquito . 45 Forward Air Controller Equipment . 47 Visual Reconnaissance . 49 The Tactical Air Control System . 50 Mosquito Mellow . 52 Strike Control Procedures . 53 Problems Encountered . 55 Forward Air Controller Training . 60 Notes . 62 5 KOREA: THE STAGNANT WAR . 65 The Argument for Interdiction . 65 CAS along a Stabilized Front . 65 Radar-Controlled Air Strikes . 66 Communications Upgrades . 66 T-6 Upgrades . 67 Operation Thunderbolt . 67 Operation Ripper . 69 Communist Losses in the First Year . 70 Strategy Changes . 70 Pathfinder Operations . 72 The Truce Ceremony . 73 6147th TCG Deactivated . 74 Joint Air-Ground Doctrine . 74 Post Korea . 75 Notes . 78 iv Chapter Page 6 VIETNAM: THE ADVISORY YEARS . 81 Wars of National Liberation . 81 Developing the Counterinsurgency Force . 82 Farm Gate . 82 Command Structure . 89 Air Operations in 1962 . 90 Air Operations in 1963 . 94 Air Operations in 1964 . 98 The Gulf of Tonkin . 101 New Demands . 102 Notes . 104 7 VIETNAM: SLOW FAC OPERATIONS . 109 FACs Come of Age . 109 FAC Aircraft . 110 Personnel Requirements . 114 Seventh Air Force . 115 504th Tactical Air Support Group . 116 Increased Manning Requirements . 117 Qualifications . 118 Rules of Engagement . 120 Locating the Enemy . 121 Visual Reconnaissance Process . 122 In-Country Operations, 1965–72 . 125 Employing the FAC Force . 129 Navy Participation . 132 The Battle of Khe Sanh . 133 The Tet Offensive . 134 Cleared in Wet! . 135 Notes . 140 8 EXPANDING MISSIONS . 145 Night Operations . 145 Air Operations in Laos . 150 USAF Controllers in Cambodia . 160 Notes . 164 v Chapter Page 9 THE FAST FORWARD AIR CONTROLLERS . 167 Out-Country Operations, 1964–65 . 167 Commando Sabre . 171 F-4 “Phantom” FACs . 181 Notes . 195 10 VIETNAMIZATION AND AMERICAN WITHDRAWAL . 201 Vietnamization and Close Air Support . 202 The South Vietnamese Air Force . 205 Cambodia . 207 Lam Son 719 . 210 Interdiction in Route Packages I and II . 212 The 1972 Spring Offensive . 213 Linebacker . 214 Notes . 221 11 A PERSPECTIVE ON CLOSE AIR SUPPORT . 225 Interservice Cooperation . 225 Airpower in Regional Conflicts . 233 Conclusion . 239 Notes . 241 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 243 INDEX . 263 Illustrations Figure 1 Korean Peninsula . 27 2 Vietnam . 83 vi Photographs Page T-6 “Mosquito” . 35 C-47 “Mosquito Mellow” . 39 Farm Gate Aircraft—T-28 . 85 Farm Gate Aircraft—B-26 . 85 Farm Gate Aircraft—A-19 . 86 Farm Gate Aircraft—C-47 . 86 O-1 “Bird Dog” . 97 O-2 “Skymaster” . 112 OV-10 “Bronco” . 113 F-100 “Misty” . 171 F-4D . 181 F-4E . 188 RF-4C . 189 A-10 “Thunderbolt II” . 231 vii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK About the Author Lt Col Gary Robert Lester was born in Bristol, Connecticut, on 3 August 1947. He retired from the US Air Force in 1992 after a 23-year career. He accrued three thousand hours as an F-4 weapons systems officer flying F-4 Phantom II fighters. Colonel Lester served two combat tours in Southeast Asia as a “Fast-FAC.” Beginning in 1981, he flew operational test and evaluation missions for advanced weapons and aircraft systems and was an instructor at both of Air Combat Command’s test centers. He completed his career as director, Tactics and Test Division, 79th Test and Evaluation Group, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. After retirement, Colonel Lester served as associate assistant professor of World Civilization at Okaloosa-Walton Community College and associate assistant professor of American History and Western Civilization for Troy State University, Florida Region. Lester holds a bachelor’s degree in journalism from Wichita State University (1969), a Master of Public Administration degree from Golden Gate University (1985), and a PhD in history from Florida State University (1994). He is also a graduate of Air War College, Air University, Maxwell AFB, Alabama. ix Colonel Lester is a member of the Red River Valley Fighter Pilots Association, the Retired Officer Association, the American Historical Association, and the Pensacola Civil War Round Table. He currently resides in Prescott, Arizona, with his wife Penny. x Preface Comparable to twentieth century cavalry, early forward air controllers (FAC) probed, observed, and reported enemy activity. Flying rickety, underpowered, and unarmed aircraft, they operated on the leading edge of ground combat. The efficient use of airborne FACs never developed in a meaningful way in World War II, with the possible exception of their use in Marine amphibious operations in the Pacific. But the rugged terrain of Korea and the jungle mazes of Vietnam restricted the capabilities of ground controllers to identify targets, thus expanding the need for “eyes in the air.” FAC roles changed from those of probing, observing, and reporting, to those of locating targets, marking them for air strikes, and taking an active role in their destruction. This expanded mission resulted in the inevitable evolution of FAC equipment and responsibilities. Interservice differences regarding the definition of close air support (CAS) caused controversies which clouded ground- support operations in both Korea and Vietnam. The Navy and the Marines saw CAS as the primary mission for airpower. The Air Force and the Army saw CAS as the last priority, to be employed after air superiority has been gained and maintained, supplies have been interdicted, and the enemy’s infrastructure has been damaged. Even the definition of what constitutes CAS was not resolved by the services. In both Korea and Vietnam, these interservice differences were resolved in favor of the Air Force; a Tactical Air Control System was designed to support the Air Force’s concept of CAS, and the FAC became a critical component of that system. In Korea, the FAC’s role began as an observer. It quickly became apparent that the lack of heavy artillery early in the conflict made aircraft bombardment necessary to support friendly ground troops. Getting the observer above the battlefield seemed the best way to identify threats to friendly forces. As the North Koreans swept down the peninsula, xi targets of opportunity were plentiful behind their rapidly advancing forces—and United Nations airpower was often the only force slowing their advance. Mosquitoes were concerned with controlling the “airborne artillery” necessary to protect UN forces in retreat. Entrenched UN forces at Pusan presented a new problem for the controllers: destroy enemy equipment and supplies before they arrived at the stagnant front. Gen Douglas MacArthur’s successful invasion at Inchon and Eighth Army’s “breakout” at the Pusan perimeter represented additional challenges to FACs. The rapid offensive advance made identification of friendly and enemy forces more difficult, and FAC responsibilities were extended to a greater range. Lack of a defined “bomb-line” made close control of airpower more important. Intervention by the Red Chinese in November 1950 turned the conflict into a see-saw slugfest that eventually stagnated along the 38th parallel. The “trench warfare” in Korea between 1951 and 1953 presented other challenges to airpower as the battle lines became fixed and enemy men and equipment were entrenched. Interdiction became airpower’s primary mission as CAS became less effective. Forward air controllers were disbanded during the interwar years (1954–61) as each service competed for defense dollars during the cold war. Strategic weapons and nuclear war on a grand scale occupied Department of Defense thinking for nearly a decade. If the notion of close air support and FACs existed at all, it was a very low priority. The services competed for nuclear submarines, strategic ballistic missile systems, intercontinental bombers, and aircraft carriers. The concept of a conventional confrontation in Europe was approached as being only the beginning of what would become a global nuclear conflict. In this environment, funding for low-technology, light, observer-type aircraft was a low priority indeed. Preparing for “unconventional” war finally received attention under the Kennedy administration. Soviet “wars of national liberation,” announced by Soviet Chairman Nikita Khrushchev in 1960, were recognized as the most probable type of conflict.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electronic Warfare Fundamentals
    ELECTRONIC WARFARE FUNDAMENTALS NOVEMBER 2000 PREFACE Electronic Warfare Fundamentals is a student supplementary text and reference book that provides the foundation for understanding the basic concepts underlying electronic warfare (EW). This text uses a practical building-block approach to facilitate student comprehension of the essential subject matter associated with the combat applications of EW. Since radar and infrared (IR) weapons systems present the greatest threat to air operations on today's battlefield, this text emphasizes radar and IR theory and countermeasures. Although command and control (C2) systems play a vital role in modern warfare, these systems are not a direct threat to the aircrew and hence are not discussed in this book. This text does address the specific types of radar systems most likely to be associated with a modern integrated air defense system (lADS). To introduce the reader to EW, Electronic Warfare Fundamentals begins with a brief history of radar, an overview of radar capabilities, and a brief introduction to the threat systems associated with a typical lADS. The two subsequent chapters introduce the theory and characteristics of radio frequency (RF) energy as it relates to radar operations. These are followed by radar signal characteristics, radar system components, and radar target discrimination capabilities. The book continues with a discussion of antenna types and scans, target tracking, and missile guidance techniques. The next step in the building-block approach is a detailed description of countermeasures designed to defeat radar systems. The text presents the theory and employment considerations for both noise and deception jamming techniques and their impact on radar systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Loran C Cycle Matching Operational Evaluation in North Pacific Area
    ~Opy 19 Report No. FAA ...RD-75-142 1-= FAA WJH Technical Center 1111\\\ 11\\1 11m 11111 11m 11111 1III1 11111 11111111 00090609 LORAN C CYCLE MATCHING OPERATIONAL EVALUATION IN NORTH PACIFIC AREA Jon R. Hamilton . .. NAFEC :~. LIBRARY DEC 2197~· # . October 1975 Final Report Document is avai lable to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. Preparell for u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Systems Research &Development Service Washington, D.C. 20590 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of infor­ mation exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. 1 -=~,....e;.,...~_r~_~.,...~.,...' ~T 'I";~T,iW', 1--:-_' -..,..7_5..,..-_1_4_2 ....'·-O:;;;;-"=;;;;=:--.-- (000'0' No 4. Tit'e and Subtitle 5. Rer,ort Dote Loran C Cycle Matching Operational Evaluation in October 1975 North Pacific Area I-:- ------::-------:::----~--_1 1'-::--:---:--:-:---------------------------- ,g. P .. rio-Ming Orgonlzation Report N.o. 7. Author/ .) Jon R. Hami 1ton P~rfo,mi"g 9. l.Ontlnenta Organitotjpi) I-\lr N.p[e. lneS, and Acld'fu nco In. Wark Unit No. /TRAIS) International Airport 11. Cont'oct or Grant No. Los Angeles, California 90009 DOT -FA75WA-3607 -:-. '--'~"--"----'-'" ._.---------­ 1J. 1" yp.. "f Qepc"t 01"1' Period Coy"r.d ~-....,.....-----_._---_._._._----.-_._--.-. __._._.__..._. __ ._---._.._." 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and ~cldr..". Final Department of Transportation I October 1975 Federal Aviation Administration Systems Research and Development Service 14. Spc.nsorinll Agene./ Code Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • The LLI Review: Fall 2011, Volume 6
    Volume 6 Fall 2011 The Annual Journal of the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Explorations by and about older learners In this issue: ■ Research and Theory ■ Life Stories ■ Best Practices ■ Poetry ■ Learning Resources The LLI Review Editor E. Michael Brady Professor of Adult Education and Senior Research Fellow Osher Lifelong Learning Institute University of Southern Maine Associate Editors Robert Atkinson Professor of Human Development and Senior Research Fellow Osher Lifelong Learning Institute University of Southern Maine Rick Lamb Osher Lifelong Learning Institute University of Southern Maine Betty Welt Coastal Senior College Thomaston, Maine Poetry Editor Pat Budd Osher Lifelong Learning Institute University of Southern Maine Editorial Board Pauline Abbott, OLLI at California State University at Fullerton Marilyn Blumsack, OLLI at Tufts University Anne Cardale, National Resource Center for the Osher Lifelong Learning Institutes Richard B. Chobot, Consultant Rebecca Goodman, OLLI at University of Hawaii Marvin Hunt, School of Professional and Graduate Programs, Baker University Nona Lyons, University College, Cork (Ireland) Barbara Peterson, OLLI at Northwestern University Ara Rogers, OLLI at the University of South Florida Lucille D. Salerno, OLLI at University of Missouri-Columbia, Michelle Sierpina, OLLI at University of Texas Medical Branch Vincent Waldron, OLLI at Arizona State University Print ISSN 1932–7625 Online ISSN 1932–7633 The LLI Review is indexed in EBSCOHOST including Academic Search Premier and Education Research Complete. For information about how to obtain additional print copies of The LLI Review, please go to www.osher.net Cover photographs by Michael Saukstelis, Promax Productions, Inc. Copy editor: Kyle Allen The LLI Review Fall 2011 Welcome elcome to Volume 6 of The LLI Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Always a Marine” Men’S Hoodie for Me City State Zip in the Size Indicated Below As Described in This Announcement
    MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES 4 1 0 2 LY U J Leathernwwew.mca-marcines.org/lekatherneck Happy Birthday, America Iraq 2004: Firefghts in the “City of Mosques” Riding With the Mounted Color Guard Settling Scores: The Battle to Take Back Guam A Publication of the Marine Corps Association & Foundation Cov1.indd 1 6/12/14 12:04 PM Welcome to Leatherneck Magazine’s Digital Edition July 2014 We hope you are continuing to enjoy the digital edition of Leatherneck with its added content and custom links to related information. Our commitment to expanding our digital offerings continues to refect progress. Also, access to added content is available via our website at www.mca- marines.org/leatherneck and you will fnd reading your Leatherneck much easier on smartphones and tablets. Our focus of effort has been on improving our offerings on the Internet, so we want to hear from you. How are we doing? Let us know at: [email protected]. Thank you for your continuing support. Semper Fidelis, Col Mary H. Reinwald, USMC (Ret) Editor How do I navigate through this digital edition? Click here. L If you need your username and password, call 1-866-622-1775. Welcome Page Single R New Style.indd 2 6/12/14 11:58 AM ALWAYS FAITHFUL. ALWAYS READY. Cov2.indd 1 6/9/14 10:31 AM JULY 2014, VOL. XCVII, No. 7 Contents LEATHERNECK—MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES FEATURES 10 The In-Between: Touring the Korean DMZ 30 100 Years Ago: Marines at Vera Cruz By Roxanne Baker By J.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DOD Is Beefing up Operations at Andersen Air Force Base and Throughout the Marianas
    ccess is the name of the game for security in the Pacific. For airmen, this access hinges on Guam. Guam is an American pos- session—US soil. While there are many other desirable bas- Aing locations in the western Pacific, Guam—nearly 220 square miles of sov- ereign American territory about 3,900 miles west of Hawaii—is the only one where basing rights will never be an issue. Andersen Air Force Base, at the north- ern tip of the island, is a historic instal- lation. The main runway is famous for its dip in the center, an ocean cliff at the end, and its white color—radiating from crushed coral mixed in the concrete. Andersen hosted US combat aircraft in World War II and throughout the Vietnam War and the Cold War. For the last 10 years, USAF has been increasing its presence on Guam. So has the Navy, which homeports submarines there, and plans call for some Marine Corps aviation and ground units from Okinawa to move to a new home on the island. The strategic importance of Guam extends to other territories in the Marianas island chain such as Tinian and Saipan. President Obama’s Asia-Pacific rebal- ance leans heavily on Guam for access, transient staging, and presence. “What many people do not realize is that it sits at the tip of the spear for the defense of our nation and is woven into the strategic fabric of the Pacific theater,” noted Rep. Solomon Ortiz (D- Tex.) in 2009. The Guam Hub Before airpower, the Northern Mari- anas were the site of Spanish imperial stopovers and Japanese occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • From Stalingrad to Khe Sanh: Factors in the Successful Use of Tactical Airlift to Support Isolated Land Battle Areas
    From Stalingrad to Khe Sanh: Factors in the Successful Use of Tactical Airlift to Support Isolated Land Battle Areas Dr. David K. Vaughan, Air Force Institute of Technology Major James H. Donoho, Air Combat Command In the last several years, the U. S. Air Force has provided key aerial logistics support for a number of relatively isolated locations where the threat of hostile fire has existed, including Tuzla and Mogadishu. Our airlift forces have been fortunate in that they have been able to conduct their operations into these remote locations successfully and, for the most part, safely. In crucial situations, necessary supplies—ammunition, food, fuel, equipment—are usually delivered by tactical airlift aircraft. From the earliest days, tactical airlift has tried to keep the losses small while delivering the greatest amount of supplies to the people who need it. Unfortunately, in spite of the best intentions of operational planners, that goal is not easily achieved. An examination of three instances should help to illustrate this fact and to suggest some essential aspects of successful tactical airlift in crisis situations. Three twentieth century land battles stand out for the role played by tactical airlift in affecting the outcome: the battle for Stalingrad in 1942-43, the siege at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, and the attack on Khe Sanh in 1968. In each of these three cases, the units under siege were located at some distance (100-200 miles) from their supply bases. Attempts were made in each situation to supply the besieged units through the use of airlift. In each case, the duration of the airlift support effort was about two months.
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower in Three Wars
    AIRPOWER IN THREE WARS GENERAL WILLIAM W. MOMYER USAF, RET. Reprint Edition EDITORS: MANAGING EDITOR - LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE, MS TEXTUAL EDITOR - MAJOR JAMES C. GASTON, PHD ILLUSTRATED BY: LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2003 Air University Library Cataloging Data Momyer, William W. Airpower in three wars / William W. Momyer ; managing editor, A. J. C. Lavalle ; textual editor, James C. Gaston ; illustrated by A. J. C. Lavalle–– Reprinted. p. ; cm. With a new preface. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-116-3 1. Airpower. 2. World War, 1939–1945––Aerial operations. 3. Korean War. 1950–1953––Aerial operations. 4. Vietnamese Conflict, 1961–1975––Aerial oper- ations. 5. Momyer, William W. 6. Aeronautics, Military––United States. I. Title. II. Lavalle, A. J. C. (Arthur J. C.), 1940– III. Gaston, James C. 358.4/009/04––dc21 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii TO . all those brave airmen who fought their battles in the skies for command of the air in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PREFACE 2003 When I received the request to update my 1978 foreword to this book, I thought it might be useful to give my perspective of some aspects on the employment of airpower in the Persian Gulf War, the Air War over Serbia (Operation Allied Force), and the war in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom).
    [Show full text]
  • JULIA, ANNE, MARIE PONT Née Le 22 Avril 1975 À PARIS XVI
    ENVT ANNEE 2003 THESE : 2003- TOU 3 DES ANIMAUX, DES GUERRES ET DES HOMMES De l’utilisation des animaux dans les guerres de l’antiquité à nos jours THESE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR VETERINAIRE DIPLOME D’ETAT Présentée et soutenue publiquement en 2003 Devant l’Université Paul-Sabatier de Toulouse Par JULIA, ANNE, MARIE PONT Née le 22 avril 1975 à PARIS XVI Directeur de thèse : M. le Professeur Michel FRANC JURY Liste des professeurs 2 A Monsieur le Professeur …. 3 Professeur de la faculté de Médecine de Toulouse Qui nous a fait l’honneur d’accepter la présidence de notre jury de thèse A Monsieur le Professeur Michel Franc Professeur à l’Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse Qui a accepté de diriger cette thèse, pour la confiance et la patience qu’il a bien voulu m’accorder. Je vous témoigne toute ma gratitude et ma profonde reconnaissance. A Monsieur….. Professeur à l’Ecole Nationale vétérinaire de Toulouse Pour l’attention qu’il a bien voulu apporter à l’examen de ce travail 4 A mes parents, présents au jour le jour. Ce que je suis aujourd’hui je vous le dois. Vous m’avez épaulée dans chaque moment de ma vie, soutenue dans tous les tracas et les aléas de l’existence, poussée en avant pour tenter de donner le meilleur de moi-même. Si aujourd’hui je réalise mon rêve d’enfant, c’est en grande partie grâce à vous, à la ligne de conduite que vous m’avez montrée, autant dans ma vie personnelle que professionnelle.
    [Show full text]
  • HELP from ABOVE Air Force Close Air
    HELP FROM ABOVE Air Force Close Air Support of the Army 1946–1973 John Schlight AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM Washington, D. C. 2003 i Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schlight, John. Help from above : Air Force close air support of the Army 1946-1973 / John Schlight. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Close air support--History--20th century. 2. United States. Air Force--History--20th century. 3. United States. Army--Aviation--History--20th century. I. Title. UG703.S35 2003 358.4'142--dc22 2003020365 ii Foreword The issue of close air support by the United States Air Force in sup- port of, primarily, the United States Army has been fractious for years. Air commanders have clashed continually with ground leaders over the proper use of aircraft in the support of ground operations. This is perhaps not surprising given the very different outlooks of the two services on what constitutes prop- er air support. Often this has turned into a competition between the two serv- ices for resources to execute and control close air support operations. Although such differences extend well back to the initial use of the airplane as a military weapon, in this book the author looks at the period 1946- 1973, a period in which technological advances in the form of jet aircraft, weapons, communications, and other electronic equipment played significant roles. Doctrine, too, evolved and this very important subject is discussed in detail. Close air support remains a critical mission today and the lessons of yesterday should not be ignored. This book makes a notable contribution in seeing that it is not ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • BINGO Ieuming Irralh
    PAGE TWENTY-FOUR iH a n rh P lpr €imttng FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1969 0 Avenge Dnfly Net Press Ron IW Tte Week Haded Football Women Voter Canva.ss to Mr. and Mrs. James Porter, The W e a th e r About Town Manchester Amston; a son to Mr. and Mrs. Lights Asked dW e 28. U*» /The R ev. James Birdsall, Set Social Event The Manchester registrars William Houle, 65 Bette Circle, Cloudiness increasing thi. af. vicar of St. Peter’s Ki>iscopaI of voters have mailed no­ Hospital Note.s Vernon; a daughter-to Mr. and temoon and tonight with chance Church in. Wapplng, will con­ Women’s Axixlllary of Man­ tices to approxim ately 1,400 M rs. Donald H ahn, 127 School For Street 15,459 of showers. Tonight’s low 60 to iEuming Irralh 56. ’Tomorrow partly cloudgr, duct a service Sunday at 8:15 chester iMldget and Pony Foot-, persons on the voting lists, V IS m N a HOCB8 St.: a son to Mr. and Mrs. Ger­ a.m. on radio station WINF. Inteniiedlate Care Semi- A request for street Ugtits on MmneheMter— A City of ViUate Charm cod wkh highs 66 to TO. ball Association will hold a get- none of whom were at their ald Nicholson, East Hartford. 'Kie program is sponsored by voting addresses of record private, noon-Z p.m ., and 4 p.m. DISCHARGED YESTERDAY: Elizabeth Dr., a repeat com­ VOL. LXXXVm, NO. 299 the Manchester Council of acquainted session for mothers 8 p.m.; private rooms, 10 a.m.- Jo h n E .
    [Show full text]
  • Reposturing the Force V
    NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 26 N A Reposturing the Force V AL U.S. Overseas Presence in the Twenty-first Century W AR COLLEGE NE WPOR T P AP ERS N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O N L L U E E G H E T R I VI IBU OR A S CT MARI VI 26 Carnes Lord, Editor Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Cover Preparations for evening flight operations on board the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) in March 2005. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate Airman Ryan O’Connor. T:\Academic\Newport Papers\Newport Paper Lord\Ventura\NPLord.vp Tuesday, February 07, 2006 10:14:03 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Reposturing the Force U.S. Overseas Presence in the Twenty-first Century Carnes Lord, Editor NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS Newport, Rhode Island T:\Academic\Newport Papers\Newport Paper Lord\Ventura\NPLord.vp Tuesday, February 07, 2006 10:14:13 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Naval War College The Newport Papers are extended research projects that the Newport, Rhode Island Editor, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the Center for Naval Warfare Studies President of the Naval War College consider of particular Newport Paper Twenty-six interest to policy makers, scholars, and analysts. February 2006 The views expressed in the Newport Papers are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the President, Naval War College Naval War College or the Department of the Navy.
    [Show full text]