DOCSLIB.ORG

Extinction and Environmental Change Across the Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in Tanzania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extinction and Environmental Change Across the Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in Tanzania Extinction and environmental change across the Eocene-Oligocene boundary in Tanzania Paul N. Pearson Ian K. McMillan School of Earth, Ocean, and Planetary Sciences, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3YE, UK Bridget S. Wade Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA Tom Dunkley Jones Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WCE 6BT, UK Helen K. Coxall School of Earth, Ocean, and Planetary Sciences, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3YE, UK Paul R. Bown Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WCE 6BT, UK Caroline H. Lear School of Earth, Ocean, and Planetary Sciences, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3YE, UK ABSTRACT The Eocene-Oligocene transition (between ca. 34 and 33.5 Ma) is the most profound episode of lasting global change to have occurred since the end of the Cretaceous. Diverse geologi- cal evidence from around the world indicates cooling, ice growth, sea-level fall, and acceler- ated extinction at this time. Turnover in the oceanic plankton included the extinction of the foraminifer Family Hantkeninidae, which marks the Eocene-Oligocene boundary in its type section. Another prominent extinction affected larger foraminifera, which resulted in the loss of some of the world’s most abundant and widespread shallow-water carbonate-secreting organisms. However, problems of correlation have made it diffi cult to relate these events to each other and to the global climate transition as widely recorded in oxygen and carbon iso- tope records from deep-sea cores. Here, we report new paleontological and geochemical data from hemipelagic sediment cores on the African margin of the Indian Ocean (Tanzania Drill- ing Project Sites 11, 12 and 17). The Eocene-Oligocene boundary is located between two prin- cipal steps in the stable-isotope records. The extinction of shallow-water carbonate producers coincided with an extended phase of ecological disruption in the plankton and preceded maxi- mum glacial conditions in the early Oligocene by ~200 k.y. Keywords: mass extinction, Eocene, Oligocene, foraminifera, nannofossils. INTRODUCTION such as Sites 744 (Zachos et al., 1994) and 1218 tributing to a sharp decline in shallow-water car- The Eocene-Oligocene boundary is defi ned at (Coxall et al., 2005) do not contain hantkeninids. bonate production (e.g., Kiessling et al., 2003). its Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) These considerations have led to recent calls for However, very few sections are complete across at Massignano in Italy at a level that corre- the formal Eocene-Oligocene boundary to be the boundary, and none has well-defi ned plank- sponds to the extinction of the Hantkeninidae moved to a stratigraphic level or biostratigraphic tonic biostratigraphy, so it is has been unclear (Premoli Silva and Jenkins, 1993). Unfortu- horizon that is more easily correlated to the how rapid the extinction was and how it cor- nately, carbonate preservation is poor in the global climatic changes revealed by the isotope related to the stage boundary and/or global cli- type section, and stable-isotope stratigraphy is data (van Mourik and Brinkhuis, 2005). mate transition. unreliable (Bodiselitsch et al., 2004), so there It has long been known that a variety of long- is uncertainty as to how the formal boundary lived and distinctive larger benthic foraminifera NEW DRILL CORES level relates to global environmental changes. disappeared near the end of the Eocene (e.g., We address these problems of correlation An important drill core through the Eocene- Glaessner, 1945). Following a detailed review by analyzing a newly discovered Eocene- Oligocene boundary at Deep Sea Drilling of shallow-water carbonate sections in the Oligocene boundary section in the Kilwa Group Project (DSDP) Site 522 in the South Atlantic Indian and Pacifi c Oceans, Mediterranean, and of Tan zania, drilled at Tanzania Drilling Project shows that the extinction of the Hantkeninidae Americas, Adams et al. (1986) suggested that (TDP) Sites 11, 12, and 17. The sediments are preceded the most positive oxygen isotopic val- there had been a rapid mass extinction. Major hemipelagic clays with accessory debris fl ows ues, which correspond to the early Oligocene groups to disappear included the Discocyclini- deposited in a bathyal outer-shelf or slope envi- glacial maximum (Liu et al., 2004; Oberhänsli dae, Asterocyclinidae, and some Nummulitidae. ronment in an estimated 300–500 m of water et al., 1984; Zachos et al., 1994), but the micro- Because these groups were so abundant and (Nicholas et al., 2006, 2007). The area has subse- fossils are rare and fragmentary because of dis- widespread, it is plausible that their extinction quently been uplifted, and the sedimentary suc- solution (Poore, 1984). Other important sections had an effect on the global carbon cycle by con- cession is exposed on land. Analysis of organic © 2008 The Geological Society of America. For permission to copy, contact Copyright Permissions, GSA, or [email protected]. GEOLOGY,Geology, February February 2008; 2008 v. 36; no. 2; p. 179–182; doi: 10.1130/G24308A.1; 3 fi gures; Data Repository item 2008042. 179 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/36/2/179/3534940/i0091-7613-36-2-179.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 biomarkers (van Dongen et al., 2006) shows that datums and geochemical tie-points to generate A B the Kilwa Group clays have never been deeply an age model and correlate the record to deep- buried. They are characterized throughout by sea sites (see the GSA Data Repository1). The excellent preservation of carbonate microfossils age model is on the time scale of Berggren et (foraminifera and nanno fossils) (Fig. 1); hence, al. (1995) with the E/O boundary at 33.7 Ma. the material is ideal for geochemical analysis A minor unconformity occurs in the lower- (Pearson et al., 2001, 2007). The cores also con- most Oligocene at the two more northerly sites tain larger forami nifera that were transported (TDP 17 and 11), resulting in ~12 m and 3 m μ μ 100 m 100 m across the narrow continental shelf to the site of eroded or missing section, respectively. The CDof deposition, both as adult specimens in debris southerly site (TDP Site 12) appears complete fl ows and as juveniles dispersed through the across the Eocene-Oligocene boundary, which background clay sediment (Fig. 1B). occurs in monotonous mudstone facies. Correlation between the sites was achieved using a series of microfossil markers, which BIOTIC TURNOVER allowed us to construct a composite depth scale. Detailed studies of the microfossil biostratig- We used a combination of biostratigraphic raphies will be published elsewhere but can 1 μm1 μm be summarized here. The Shannon diversity Figure 1. Microfossils from Tanzania Drilling Project (TDP) Sites 12 and 17 showing excel- index for planktonic foraminifera (Fig. 2B) lent preservation. A: Planktonic foraminifer Cribrohantkenina infl ata (sample TDP17/39/4, 31–39 cm) showing typical “glassy” transparent test (taken in refl ected light with Leica 1GSA Data Repository item 2008042, age model , DFC 480 camera mounted on a Leica MZ 16 microscope using Earth Basic image software, stable isotope data, and platinum group element exposure 180 ms). B: Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of juvenile larger ben- data, is available online at www.geosociety.org/ thic foraminifer Discocyclina (sample TDP17/39/4, 31–39 cm). C: SEM of coccosphere of pubs/ft2008.htm, or on request from editing@ Cyclicargolithus fl oridanus (sample TDP 12/47–2). D: SEM of Pontosphaera multipora and geosociety.org or Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. other coccoliths (sample TDP 12/26/2, 62 cm). Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301, USA. spp. sp.” sp Plankton Plankton diversity sp. A B Numm. extinctions (Shannon Index) Numm. D Tanzania T. ampliapertura δ18O (‰ VPDB) F Events Age (Ma) 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 -3.5-3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 Depth tie- points (mcd) Epoch 32.8 ODP Site 1218 Asterocyclinidae Discocyclinidae ‘discoidal’ S. orbitoideus “Biplanispira Heterostegina Operculina ‘lenticular’ Pellatispira C. orbitoideus ODP Site 744 (26.28) 33.0 TDP17 44.16 nannoplankton 33.2 TDP Site 17 TDP12 nannoplankton Early Oligocene 33.4 glacial maximum 96.64 STEP 2 33.6 Hantkeninidae Eocene-Oligocene 102.70 Boundary Turborotalia STEP 1 107.40 spp. Hantkeninidae 33.8 Site 522 Isotope shift P. papillatum Plankton Ecological disturbance extinctions Benthic foram extinction 130.35 34.0 D. saipanensis TDP12 TDP Site 12 planktonic 34.2 foraminifera ODP Site 522 Late EoceneLate Early Oligocene 34.4 34.6 (205.71) C Stratigraphic range of larger ‘reef’ foraminifera 00.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 E Deep-sea δ18O (‰ VPDB) Figure 2. Biotic and geochemical events across Eocene-Oligocene boundary compared to deep-sea records. A: Plankton extinction levels. B: Shannon diversity index for planktonic foraminifera (red diamonds, Tanzania Drilling Project [TDP] Site 12) and calcareous nanno fossils (black circles, TDP Site 12; gray circles, TDP Site 17; lines show three-point moving average). C: Chronostratigraphic ranges of larger benthic foraminifera, compiled from TDP Sites 11, 12, and 17. Legend: thick bars = common, thick dotted bars = frequent, thin dashed lines = rare, Numm = Nummulites, S. orbitoideus = Spiroclypeus orbitoideus , C. orbitoideus = Cycloclypeus sp. D: Planktonic foraminifer oxygen isotope record from Turborotalia ampliapertura, 212–150 μ (light-green diamonds, TDP Site 12; dark-green diamonds, TDP Site 17). VPDB—Vienna Peedee belemnite. E: Deep-sea benthic foraminifer isotope records (purple diamonds, Ocean Drilling Program [ODP] Site 1218 from Coxall et al. [2005]; red diamonds, ODP Site 744 from Zachos et al. [1994]; black diamonds ODP Site 522 from Zachos et al. [1994] with one point removed as suspect [S. Bohaty, 2007, personal commun.]). Hantkenina extinction with sampling bracket is from Poore (1984).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reduced El Niño–Southern Oscillation During the Last Glacial
    RESEARCH | REPORTS PALEOCEANOGRAPHY vergent results and our newly generated data by considering geographic location, choice of fora- minifera species, and changes in thermocline – depth (see supplementary materials). Reduced El Niño Southern Oscillation ENSO variability is asymmetric (the El Niño warm phase is more extreme than the La Niña during the Last Glacial Maximum cold phase) (14), so temperature variations in the equatorial Pacific are not normally distrib- Heather L. Ford,1,2* A. Christina Ravelo,1 Pratigya J. Polissar2 uted (7, 15), and statistical tests that assume normality (e.g., standard deviation) can lead to El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a major source of global interannual variability, but erroneous conclusions with respect to changes its response to climate change is uncertain. Paleoclimate records from the Last Glacial in variance. Therefore, we use quantile-quantile Maximum (LGM) provide insight into ENSO behavior when global boundary conditions (Q-Q) plots—a simple, yet powerful way to vi- — (ice sheet extent, atmospheric partial pressure of CO2) were different from those today. sualize distribution data to compare the tem- In this work, we reconstruct LGM temperature variability at equatorial Pacific sites perature range and distribution recorded by two using measurements of individual planktonic foraminifera shells. A deep equatorial populations of individual foraminifera shells to thermocline altered the dynamics in the eastern equatorial cold tongue, resulting in interpret possible climate forcing mechanisms. reduced ENSO variability during the LGM compared to the Late Holocene. These results Sensitivity studies using modern hydrographic suggest that ENSO was not tied directly to the east-west temperature gradient, as data show how changes in ENSO and seasonality previously suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit Specimen List FLORIDA SUBMERGED the Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (145 to 34 Million Years Ago) PARADISE ISLAND
    Exhibit Specimen List FLORIDA SUBMERGED The Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (145 to 34 million years ago) FLORIDA FORMATIONS Avon Park Formation, Dolostone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; with echinoid sand dollar fossil (Periarchus lyelli); specimen from Florida Geological Survey Avon Park Formation, Limestone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; with organic layers containing seagrass remains from formation in shallow marine environment; specimen from Florida Geological Survey Ocala Limestone (Upper), Limestone from Eocene time; Jackson County, Florida; with foraminifera; specimen from Florida Geological Survey Ocala Limestone (Lower), Limestone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; specimens from Tanner Collection OTHER Anhydrite, Evaporite from early Cenozoic time; Unknown location, Florida; from subsurface core, showing evaporite sequence, older than Avon Park Formation; specimen from Florida Geological Survey FOSSILS Tethyan Gastropod Fossil, (Velates floridanus); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Barge Canal spoil island, Levy County, Florida; specimen from Tanner Collection Echinoid Sea Biscuit Fossils, (Eupatagus antillarum); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Barge Canal spoil island, Levy County, Florida; specimens from Tanner Collection Echinoid Sea Biscuit Fossils, (Eupatagus antillarum); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Mouth of Withlacoochee River, Levy County, Florida; specimens from John Sacha Collection PARADISE ISLAND The Oligocene (34 to 23 million years ago) FLORIDA FORMATIONS Suwannee
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorking the Bottle: What Triggered the Paleocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum Methane Release? Miriame
    PALEOCEANOGRAPHY, VOL. 16, NO. 6, PAGES 549-562, DECEMBER 2001 Uncorking the bottle: What triggered the Paleocene/Eocene thermal maximum methane release? MiriamE. Katz,• BenjaminS. Cramer,Gregory S. Mountain,2 Samuel Katz, 3 and KennethG. Miller,1,2 Abstract. The Paleocene/Eocenethermal maximum (PETM) was a time of rapid global warming in both marine and continentalrealms that has been attributed to a massivemethane (CH4) releasefrom marine gas hydrate reservoirs. Previously proposedmechanisms for thismethane release rely on a changein deepwatersource region(s) to increasewater temperatures rapidly enoughto trigger the massivethermal dissociationof gas hydratereservoirs beneath the seafloor.To establish constraintson thermaldissociation, we modelheat flow throughthe sedimentcolumn and showthe effectof the temperature changeon the gashydrate stability zone throughtime. In addition,we provideseismic evidence tied to boreholedata for methanerelease along portions of the U.S. continentalslope; the releasesites are proximalto a buriedMesozoic reef front. Our modelresults, release site locations, published isotopic records, and oceancirculation models neither confirm nor refute thermaldissociation as the triggerfor the PETM methanerelease. In the absenceof definitiveevidence to confirmthermal dissociation,we investigatean altemativehypothesis in which continentalslope failure resulted in a catastrophicmethane release.Seismic and isotopic evidence indicates that Antarctic source deepwater circulation and seafloor erosion caused slope retreatalong
    [Show full text]
  • The Planktonic Foraminifera of the Jurassic. Part III: Annotated Historical Review and References
    Swiss J Palaeontol (2017) 136:273–285 DOI 10.1007/s13358-017-0130-0 The planktonic foraminifera of the Jurassic. Part III: annotated historical review and references Felix M. Gradstein1,2 Received: 21 February 2017 / Accepted: 3 April 2017 / Published online: 7 July 2017 Ó Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz (SCNAT) 2017 Abstract Over 70 publications on Jurassic planktonic With few exceptions, Jurassic planktonic foraminifera foraminifera, particularly by East and West European and publications based on thin-sections are not covered in this Canadian micropalaeontologists, are summarized and review. Emphasis is only on thin-section studies that had briefly annotated. It provides an annotated historic over- impact on our understanding of Jurassic planktonic for- view for this poorly understood group of microfossils, aminifera. By the same token, microfossil casts do not going back to 1881 when Haeusler described Globigerina allow study of the taxonomically important wall structure helvetojurassica from the Birmenstorfer Schichten of and sculpture; reference to such studies is limited to few of Oxfordian age in Canton Aargau, Switzerland. historic interest. The first four, presumably planktonic foraminiferal spe- Keywords Jurassic Á Planktonic foraminifera Á Annotated cies from Jurassic strata, were described in the second half of historical review 1881–2015 the nineteenth century: Globigerina liasina from the Middle Lias of France (Terquem and Berthelin 1875), G. helveto- jurassica from the Early Oxfordian of Switzerland (Haeusler Annotated historical overview 1881, 1890) and G. oolithica and G. lobata from the Bajocian of France (Terquem 1883). Some descriptions were from Jurassic planktonic foraminifera have been studied since the internal moulds. It was not until 1958 (see below) that more second half of the nineteen’s century, but it was not until after attention was focused on the occurrences of early planktonic the Second World War that micropalaeontological studies foraminifera, with emphasis on free specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Minerals at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Interpretations, Limits, and Perspectives
    minerals Review Clay Minerals at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Interpretations, Limits, and Perspectives Fabio Tateo Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGG-CNR) Padova, c/o Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, Via Gradenigo 6, I-35131 Padova, Italy; [email protected] Received: 20 October 2020; Accepted: 26 November 2020; Published: 30 November 2020 Abstract: The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) was an “extreme” episode of environmental stress that affected the Earth in the past, and it has numerous affinities concerning the rapid increase in the greenhouse effect. It has left several biological, compositional, and sedimentary facies footprints in sedimentary records. Clay minerals are frequently used to decipher environmental effects because they represent their source areas, essentially in terms of climatic conditions and of transport mechanisms (a more or less fast travel, from the bedrocks to the final site of recovery). Clay mineral variations at the PETM have been studied by several authors in terms of climatic and provenance indicators, but also as tracers of more complicated interplay among different factors requiring integrated interpretation (facies sorting, marine circulation, wind transport, early diagenesis, etc.). Clay minerals were also believed to play a role in the recovery of pre-episode climatic conditions after the PETM exordium, by becoming a sink of atmospheric CO2 that is considered a necessary step to switch off the greenhouse hyperthermal effect. This review aims to consider the use of clay minerals made by different authors to study the effects of the PETM and their possible role as effective (simple) proxy tools for environmental reconstructions.
    [Show full text]
  • Planktonic Foraminifera) from the Middle- Upper Eocene of Jabal Hafit, United Arab Emirates
    Open access e-Journal Earth Science India eISSN: 0974 – 8350 Vol. 11 (II), April, 2018, pp. 122 - 132 http://www.earthscienceindia.info/ Hantkeninidae (Planktonic Foraminifera) from the Middle- Upper Eocene of Jabal Hafit, United Arab Emirates Haidar Salim Anan Gaza P. O. Box 1126, Palestine Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Six species of the planktonic foraminiferal Family Hantkeninidae belonging to the genera namely Cribrohantkenina and Hantkenina are recorded and described from the Middle- and Upper Eocene succession of Jabal Hafit, Al Ain area, United Arab Emirates. The species include Cribrohantkenina inflata, Hantkenina alabamensis, H. compressa, H. australis, H. liebusi and H. primitiva. The three species of Hantkenina named last are recorded for the first time from the UAE. Keywords: Middle Eocene, Upper Eocene, Hantkeninidae species, United Arab Emirates INTRODUCTION The species of the genera Cribrohantkenina and Hantkenina have a worldwide distribution encircling low and mid-latitudes. The appearance of the genus Hantkenina at 49 Ma corresponds with the Early/Middle Eocene boundary, and their extinction at 33.7 Ma denotes the Eocene/Oligocene boundary, while the genus Cribrohantkenina appears only at the Late Eocene (36. 4 Ma-34. 3 Ma) and its extinction denotes the Eocene/Oligocene boundary. Pearson (1993) noted that the genus Hantkenina have a rounded periphery and more globose chambers (e.g. H. alabamensis) and sometimes areal apertures on the chamber face around the primer aperture (=Cribrohantkenina). Coxall et al. (2003); Coxall and Pearson (2006); and Rögl and Egger (2010) noted that the genus Hantkenina evolved gradually from the genus Clavigerinella in the earliest Middle Eocene, contrary to the long- held view that it is related to the genus Pseudohastigerina evolved from Globanomalina luxorensis (Nakkady) in the earliest Early Eocene (base of Zone E2) by the development of a symmetrical umbilical aperture and slightly asymmetrical to fully planispiral test as are the result of changes in the timing of the development processes.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE V
    GSA GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE v. 4.0 CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST HIST. ANOM. (Ma) ANOM. CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 66.0 541 CALABRIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE* 1.8 31 C31 MAASTRICHTIAN 252 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 Lopin- 254 32 C32 72.1 635 2A C2A PIACENZIAN WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 3.6 gian 33 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN CAPITANIAN NEOPRO- 5 C3 CAMPANIAN Guada- 265 750 CRYOGENIAN 5.3 80 C33 WORDIAN TEROZOIC 3A MESSINIAN LATE lupian 269 C3A 83.6 ROADIAN 272 850 7.2 SANTONIAN 4 KUNGURIAN C4 86.3 279 TONIAN CONIACIAN 280 4A Cisura- C4A TORTONIAN 90 89.8 1000 1000 PERMIAN ARTINSKIAN 10 5 TURONIAN lian C5 93.9 290 SAKMARIAN STENIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 296 SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 ASSELIAN 299 5A 100 100 300 GZHELIAN 1200 C5A 13.8 LATE 304 KASIMOVIAN 307 1250 MESOPRO- 15 LANGHIAN ECTASIAN 5B C5B ALBIAN MIDDLE MOSCOVIAN 16.0 TEROZOIC 5C C5C 110 VANIAN 315 PENNSYL- 1400 EARLY 5D C5D MIOCENE 113 320 BASHKIRIAN 323 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 1500 CALYMMIAN 6 C6 APTIAN LATE 20 120 331 6A C6A 20.4 EARLY 1600 M0r 126 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 MIDDLE VISEAN MISSIS- M3 BARREMIAN SIPPIAN STATHERIAN C6C 23.0 6C 130 M5 CRETACEOUS 131 347 1750 HAUTERIVIAN 7 C7 CARBONIFEROUS EARLY TOURNAISIAN 1800 M10 134 25 7A C7A 359 8 C8 CHATTIAN VALANGINIAN M12 360 140 M14 139 FAMENNIAN OROSIRIAN 9 C9 M16 28.1 M18 BERRIASIAN 2000 PROTEROZOIC 10 C10 LATE
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Morphology of the Eocene Planktonic Foraminifer Hantkenina
    Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 33, no. 3, p. 237—261, July 2003 ORIGIN AND MORPHOLOGY OF THE EOCENE PLANKTONIC FORAMINIFER HANTKENINA HELEN K. COXALL,1 BRIAN T. HUBER,2 AND PAUL N. PEARSON3 ABSTRACT tion, in Pearson, 1993), intimating that the evolution of Hantkenina involved gradual morphological transition. Due Study of the origin and early evolution of the tubu- to the scarcity of Hantkenina near its first appearance level lospine-bearing planktonic foraminiferal genus Hant- and a shortage of suitable stratigraphic records of appropri- kenina reveals that it evolved gradually from the clavate ate age, these assertions have been difficult to substantiate species Clavigerinella eocanica in the earliest middle Eo- and the details of the origination and probable ancestor have cene and is unrelated to the genus Pseudohastigerina. not been satisfactorily demonstrated. The major hypotheses Clavigerinella eocanica and the lower middle Eocene that have been proposed to explain Hantkenina phylogeny species Hantkenina nuttalli share many morphologic fea- are presented in Figure 1. tures and show similar developmental patterns but differ Here we present an investigation into the origin of significantly in these aspects from P. micra. Rare, tran- Hantkenina and its evolutionary relationships with other sitional Clavigerinella-Hantkenina forms from the Hel- Eocene planktonic foraminifera using stratigraphic re- vetikum section of Austria bridge the gap between cla- cords that were unavailable to earlier workers. By using vate and tubulospinose morphologies, providing direct, comparative morphologic observations, ontogenetic mor- stratigraphically-ordered evidence of the evolutionary phometric analysis, stable isotopes, and documenting transition between Hantkenina and Clavigerinella. Cla- rare, transitional hantkeninid material from Austria, we vigerinellid ancestry is traced to a previously unde- demonstrate that Hantkenina is a monophyletic taxon that scribed low-trochospiral species, Parasubbotina eoclava evolved by gradual transition from the genus Clavigeri- sp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Middle Eocene Lowland Humid Subtropical “Shangri-La” Ecosystem in Central Tibet
    A Middle Eocene lowland humid subtropical “Shangri-La” ecosystem in central Tibet Tao Sua,b,c,1, Robert A. Spicera,d, Fei-Xiang Wue,f, Alexander Farnsworthg, Jian Huanga,b, Cédric Del Rioa, Tao Dengc,e,f, Lin Dingh,i, Wei-Yu-Dong Denga,c, Yong-Jiang Huangj, Alice Hughesk, Lin-Bo Jiaj, Jian-Hua Jinl, Shu-Feng Lia,b, Shui-Qing Liangm, Jia Liua,b, Xiao-Yan Liun, Sarah Sherlockd, Teresa Spicera, Gaurav Srivastavao, He Tanga,c, Paul Valdesg, Teng-Xiang Wanga,c, Mike Widdowsonp, Meng-Xiao Wua,c, Yao-Wu Xinga,b, Cong-Li Xua, Jian Yangq, Cong Zhangr, Shi-Tao Zhangs, Xin-Wen Zhanga,c, Fan Zhaoa, and Zhe-Kun Zhoua,b,j,1 aCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China; bCenter of Plant Ecology, Core Botanical Gardens, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China; cUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049 Beijing, China; dSchool of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, United Kingdom; eKey Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100044 Beijing, China; fCenter for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China; gSchool of Geographical Sciences and Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, United Kingdom; hCAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China; iKey Laboratory of
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Geology, V
    THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY • • Office of Geology P. 0. Box 20307 Volume 17 Number 1 Jackson, Mississippi 39289-1307 March 1996 TOWARD A REVISION OF THE GENERALIZED STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN OF MISSISSIPPI David T . D ock ery III Mississippi Office of Geology INTRODUCTION The state's Precambrian subsurface stratigraphy is from Thomas and Osborne (1987), and the Cambrian-Permsylva­ The stratigraphic columns presented here are a more nian section is modified from Dockery ( 1981) . References informative revision on the state's 1981 column published as for the Cambrian-Ordovician section of the 1981 column one sheet (Dockery, 1981). This revision wasmade forafuture include Mellen (1974, 1977); this stratigraphy is also found in text on " An Overview of Mississippi's Geology" and follows Henderson ( 1991 ). the general format and stratigraphy as pub}jshed in the Corre­ When subdivided in oil test records, the state's Ordovi­ lation of Stratigraphic Units of North America (COSUNA) ciansection generally contains the Knox Dolomite, the Stones charts (see Thomas and Osborne, 1987, and Dockery, 1988). River Group (see AJberstadt and Repetski, 1989), and the The following discussion is a brief background, giving the Nashville Group, while the Silurian contains the Wayne major sources used in the chart preparations. Suggestions for Group and Brownsport Formation. The Termessee Valley improvements may be directed to the author. Autl10rity's (1977) description of a 1,326-foot core hole at their proposed Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant site in northeast­ em Tishomingo Catmty greatly refined the stratigraphy be­ PALEOZOJCSTRATJGRAPffiCUNITS tween the Lower Ordovician Knox Dolomite and the Ross Formation of Devonian age.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palaeocene – Eocene Thermal Maximum Super Greenhouse
    The Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum super greenhouse: biotic and geochemical signatures, age models and mechanisms of global change A. SLUIJS1, G. J. BOWEN2, H. BRINKHUIS1, L. J. LOURENS3 & E. THOMAS4 1Palaeoecology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA 3Faculty of Geosciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands 4Center for the Study of Global Change, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven CT 06520-8109, USA; also at Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA Abstract: The Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), a geologically brief episode of global warming associated with the Palaeocene–Eocene boundary, has been studied extensively since its discovery in 1991. The PETM is characterized by a globally quasi-uniform 5–8 8C warming and large changes in ocean chemistry and biotic response. The warming is associated with a negative carbon isotope excursion (CIE), reflecting geologically rapid input of large amounts of isotopically light CO2 and/or CH4 into the exogenic (ocean–atmosphere) carbon pool. The biotic response on land and in the oceans was heterogeneous in nature and severity, including radiations, extinctions and migrations. Recently, several events that appear
    [Show full text]
  • Eocene, Oligocene, and Miocene Rocks and \Fertebrate Fossils at the Emerald Lake Locality, 3 Miles South of Ifellowstone National Park,Wyoming
    Eocene, Oligocene, and Miocene Rocks and \fertebrate Fossils at the Emerald Lake Locality, 3 Miles South of Ifellowstone National Park,Wyoming GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 932-A Prepared in cooperation with the Geological Survey of Wyoming, the Department of Geology of the University of Wyoming, the American Museum of Natural History, and the Carnegie Museum Eocene, Oligocene, and Miocene Rocks and \fertebrate Fossils at the Emerald Lake Locality 3 Miles South of Ifellowstone National Park,Wyoming By J. D. LOVE, MALCOLM C. McKENNA, and MARY R. DAWSON GEOLOGY OF THE TETON-JACKSON HOLE REGION, NORTHWESTERN WYOMING GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 932-A Prepared in cooperation with the Geological Survey of Wyoming, the Department of Geology of the University of Wyoming, the American Museum of Natural History, and the Carnegie Museum UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Love, John David, 1913- Eocene, Oligocene, and Miocene rocks and vertebrate fossils at the Emerald Lake locality, 3 miles south of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. (Geology of the Teton-Jackson Hole region, northwestern Wyoming) (Geological Survey Professional Paper 932-A) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Tertiary. 2. Vertebrates, Fossil. 3. Geology Wyoming Teton Co. I. McKenna, Malcolm C., joint author. II. Dawson, Mary R., joint author. III. Wyoming Geological Survey. IV. Title: Eocene, Oligocene, and Miocene rocks and vertebrate fossils at the Emerald Lake locality ... V. Series. VI. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 932-A. QE691.L79 551.?'8 76-8159 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
    [Show full text]