<<

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Feb. 1980, p. 254-257 Vol. 17, No. 2 0066-4804/80/02-0254/04$02.00/0

Treatment of Cellulitis with Ceforanide DANIEL M. MUSHER,* VICTOR FAINSTEIN, AND EDWARD J. YOUNG Infectiowus Disease Section, Department ofMedicine, The Houston Veterans Adminitration Medical Center, and the Baylor College ofMedicine, Houston, Texas 77211

Thirty-five patients with cellulitis were treated with ceforanide, 1 g every 12 h, intramuscularly. A good clinical response was observed in 33 cases. Drug failure in the remaining two patients was thought to be due to the lack of surgical debridement. Drug concentrations well in excess of inhibitory levels for Strepto- coccus pyogenes were generally present throughout the treatment period; al- though this was not true of ceforanide concentrations relative to inhibitory levels for Staphylococcus aureus, the clinical response in patients with staphylococcal infection still appeared to be entirely satisfactory. Killing of S. pyogenes by 5, 50, and 50OX the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceforanide proceeded at the same rate in vitro as did killing by 5, 50, and 50Ox the minimum inhibitory concentration of .

Ceforanide is a new which has no fluid was obtained, 0.5 to 1 ml of water or saline been shown to be effective in vitro (5, 6, 9) and was injected and reaspirated for culture in broth and in vivo (3, 6, 9) against organisms which are on sheep blood agar. Complete blood counts and serum to chemistries were studied on admission and at least ordinarily susceptible first-generation cepha- once during and once at the end of the treatment losporins. Previous clinical studies have shown period. it to provide good results in treating pneumonia In vitro studies. The minimum inhibitory concen- (2, 11), urinary tract infection (2), and a few tration (MIC) was determined for causative bacteria cases of cellulitis (2). The present study was as follows. Twofold dilutions of were made designed to investigate the use of ceforanide in in tryptic soy broth, and the tubes were inoculated treating cellulitis or erysipelas which was of suf- with 106 colony-forming units of the organism to be ficient severity to warrant hospitalization. tested. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentra- tion of that prevented obvious turbidity MATERIALS AND METHODS after incubation for 18 h at 370C. The rate of killing of Streptococcus pyogenes was studied by inoculating Patient selection. Patients were hospitalized be- tryptic soy broth which contained varying concentra- cause of cellulitis or erysipelas and were referred to tions of ceforanide or penicillin with 107 colony-form- the Infectious Disease Service at the time of admis- ing units per ml and subculturing quantitatively 3, 7, sion. The nature of the study was explained to them, 24, and 48 h later. The lower level of sensitivity of this and they were asked to sign a consent form that had method was such that <10 colony-forming units per previously been approved by Subcommittees on Ex- ml could not be detected. An agar diffusion technique perimentation Involving Human Subjects at the Bay- was used to measure ceforanide concentrations in se- lor College of Medicine and the Houston Veterans rum obtained 1, 6, and 12 h after an intramuscular Administration Medical Center. Patients who were dose, usually on day 3 or 4 of treatment. unable to give a truly informed consent, those who Adverse reactions. Ceforanide caused very little were receiving chemotherapy for treatment of malig- discomfort when given intramuscularly. One patient nancy, and those who had a life-threatening, unrelated had a transient elevation of serum glutamate oxaloac- illness were excluded. etic tmnsaminase to 280 U during ceforanide therapy; Experimental design. Patients were initially ex- this returned to normal after the drug was discontin- amined by one of the investigators and begun on ued. treatment with ceforanide, 1 g intramuscularly every 12 h. They were reexamined every day thereafter, with RESULTS changes in clinical status and the response of infected tissues being noted. Purulent material, when available, Patients. Thirty-five male patients (mean was cultured at 35°C on sheep blood agar aerobically and anaerobically. In the absence of frank pus, aspi- age, 47.6 years) were included in this study. ration of the most fluctuant areas and the advancing Twenty had at least one underlying systemic margin of the lesion was attempted, generally with a condition thought to contribute to decreased 19- to 20-gauge needle and a 10- to 20-ml syringe. ability of the host to respond to pyogenic infec- Tissue fluid was cultured anaerobically in tryptic soy tion, such as alcoholism (with or without liver broth; if enough was obtained, fluid was also cultured disease), diabetes mellitus, orrenal insufficiency. aerobically and anaerobically on sheep blood agar. If Twenty-four had an identifiable factor which 254 VOL. 17, 1980 CEFORANIDE TREATMENT OF CELLULITIS 255 compromised local resistance to infection, in- the response to therapy, criteria were estab- cluding blunt or penetrating trauma, self-injec- lished to determine the reduction of inflamma- tion, extremely poor hygiene, burns, or derna- tion in involved tissues; these included the find- tological disease. In all but one patient, at least ing of decreased heat, redness, and tenderness one predisposing factor, systemic or local, could and a crinkly appearance of the involved skin, be identified. consistent with resolving edema. The actual area Symptoms and severity of infection. Ill- involved was often less, although initially this nesses were usually acute in onset (average du- was not essential to considering a response to ration of symptoms before admission, 4.9 days; have been present. An appreciable reduction of range, 1 to 21 days). The severity of infection inflammation was observed within 48 h (rapid was graded by the following criteria: (i) mild response) in 16 patients, 48 to 96 h (adequate disease represented a localized area of cellulitis response) in 14 patients, and 96 to 168 h (slow with no lymphangitic streaks, systemic toxicity, response) in 5 patients. Five patients required or fever; (ii) moderate disease represented a surgical intervention 1 to 5 days after antibiotic more extensive area of cellulitis with or without therapy had been begun, either for debridement lymphangitic streaks, leukocyte elevation, and or to drain loculated collections of pus: three of low-grade fever, but with no systemic toxicity; these had already shown a good clinical re- (iii) severe disease represented an extensive area sponse; the other two are discussed below. The ofcellulitis with regional lymphadenopathy, leu- mean duration of ceforanide therapy was 7.4 kocyte elevation, fever, and systemic toxicity. days (range 3 to 15 days). All patients were kept None of the 35 patients had mild infection, re- in the hospital until a good clinical resolution flecting the fact that all had been hospitalized had been achieved with ceforanide. Eighteen with their infection as the primary diagnosis; 7 patients received additional oral antibiotics for had moderate, 13 had moderate to severe, and up to 2 more weeks; this was generally prescribed 15 had severe infection. Twenty-one patients by the primary care physician, presumably to had fever (temperature 2 100.2°F [ca. 37.9°C]), allow for more complete recovery of infected 5 had lymphangitis (red streaks with enlarged, tissues. tender draining lymph nodes), and 17 had a Two patients were not cured by medical treat- leukocyte count >10,000; at least one of these ment with ceforanide. In both, the lack of appro- abnormalities was present in 26 of 35 cases. A priate surgical drainage was thought to be re- cliuical distinction between cellulitis and erysi- sponsible. One had severe cellulitis and fasciitis pelas was not attempted (1, 4). due to S. pyogenes; after 48 h his temperature Bacteriological diagnosis. A bacterial was still 103°F (ca. 39.4°C; down from a peak of cause of infection was identified in 27 cases 104.8°F [ca. 40.40C]). Surgical drainage was re- either by aspirating through unbroken skin (14 fused, and penicillin (500,000 U intravenously cases) or by swabbing obviously purulent mate- every 4 h) was given in place of ceforanide. The rial (13 cases). No bacteriological diagnosis was patient continued to defervesce slowly during 5 made in the remaining eight cases despite at additional days; inflammatory changes and ser- least two attempts at aspiration from the in- osanguinous drainage from a few necrotic areas fected tissues in every case. When direct needle persisted for 3 weeks. Cultures of drainage ob- aspiration yielded grossly visible fluid, cultures tained immediately before the first dose of pen- were usually positive. If fluid was obtained only icillin were sterile. A second patient with cellu- after injection of a sterile solutibn, cultures were litis due to S. pyogenes defervesced on ceforan- usually negative. The yield was slightly higher ide, but the area ofinflammation decreased only with aspiration from the center of lesions than slightly and, on day 6 of treatment, began to from the margin, although in most instances if extend. Serum ceforanide levels were 130 ag/ml one was positive, both were. Causative orga- 1 h after an intramuscular dose and 14 ug/ml nisms were Streptococcus pyogenes (14 cases), after 12 h. Procaine penicillin G (1.2 x 106 U) Staphylococcus aureus (3 cases), S. pyogenes was given intramuscularly every 12 h. Within 23 and S. aureus (9 cases), and Streptococcus aga- h the intensity of the cellulitis was reduced, but lactiae (1 case). Blood cultures were obtained in the area of involvement remained unchanged. all but two patients and were negative. Penicillin therapy was continued. Three days Response to treatment. Of the 21 febrile later, two small fluctuant areas were incised, and patients, 21 defervesced (temperature c 99.6°F a small amount of dark red, cloudy material [ca. 37.5°C]) within 48 h of onset of therapy; the which was culture negative was removed. There- one exception will be discussed below. All pa- after, the patient rapidly improved. tients except for the one who failed to defervesce MIC and rate of bactericidal killing. The felt substantially better within 48 h after cefor- median MIC of ceforanide for 23 isolates of S. anide therapy had been instituted. To observe pyogenes was 0.3 Ag/ml (range, 0.15 to 0.6 ,Ag/ 256 MUSHER, FAINSTEIN, AND YOUNG ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CEMOTHER. ml). The median MIC of ceforanide for 12 iso- patients withstaphylococcal infections appeared lates of S. aureus was 3.1 pg/ml (range, 1.6 to to respond quite adequately to treatment with 6.2 pg/ml). The rate of bacterial killing, studied this antibiotic. The two patienbs who failed to for 19 isolates, was proportional to the concen- respond to ceforanide were both in need of sur- tration of ceforanide and paralleled that of pen- gical debridement. One patient eventually re- icillin at equivalent multiples ofthe MIC. Figure covered on penicillin without surgical interven- 1 shows that this also was true of isolates from tion probablybecause he developed pontaneous the two therapeutic failures. drainage at sites oftissue breakdown. The other Serum levels. The mean concentration of improved initially on penicillin, as he had on ceforanide in serum 1 h after intramusular in- ceforanide, but cure was thought to result from jection was 65 pag/ml (range, 21 to 104 pg/ml). surgical drainage, not from changes in antibiotic Six hours after injection the serum level was 29 therapy. pg/ml (range 6 to 60 pg/ml), and 12 h after In vitro studies showed that higher concentra- injection, it was 10 pg/ml (range, 2.1 to 31 pg/ tions of ceforanide or penicillin killed S. py- ml). ogenes more rapidly and more completely than did lower concentrations. The mean peak and. DISCUSSION trough ceforanide levels in our subjects were Ceforanide appeared to provide effective an- nearly 200 and 30 times, respectively, the MIC timicrobial therapy in 33 of 35 patients who had for S. pyogenes. Serum levels of penicillin in cellulitis that was severe enough to warrant hos- patients who receive 1.2 x 106 U of aqueous pitalization. The median MIC of S. pyogenes, procaine penicillin every 12 h are likely to exceed which was isolated as the sole pathogen in 14 the me MIC of0.006 ug/ml (8) by a substan- cases and as one of two possible pathogens in 9 tially greater margin (10). Whether this greater additional cases, was 0.3 pg/ml with all isolates therapeutic margin of penicillin is clinically sig- being inhibited by §0.6 pAg/ml; these results are nificant awaits further studies in which the ther- similar to those reported for other cephalospo- apeutic effect of these two antibiotics is com- rins (8). The concentrations of ceforanide in pared prospectively; in one such study the re- serum were much higher than the above levels sponse of soft-tissue infection to penicillin was throughout the treatment period. The MIC of similar to the response to (7). ceforanide for S. aureus was nearly tenfold Our study suggests that ceforanide has a role greater than that for S.pyogenes, confirming the in treating cases of severe cellulitis. This drug observations of Laverdiere et al. (5). These re- was well tolerated and appeared to be effective sults indicate that in some patients, ceforanide in vivo when administered intramuscularly ev- may not be present at effective anti-staphylo- ery 12 h. The unavailability of a long-acting coccal levels throughout the day. Even so our penicllinase-resitant penicillin which can be 108 A

- 107 i

106

104

0 3 24 0 3 6 Z4 TIME (HOURS) TIE (HOURS) FIG. 1. Rate ofkiUing ofS.pyogenes by vwying concentrations ofpenicilin or ceforanide. Circles, squares, and tiangks indicate 5, 50, and 5Ax MIC, respectively, ofpenicillin (open symbols) or ceforanide (closed symbols). x, Control (no antbiotic). (A) Results obtained with the isolate from the firstpatient and (B) those obtained with the isolates from the secondpatent who failed to be cured by treatment with ceforanide. VOL. 17, 1980 CEFORANIDE TREATMENT OF CELLULITIS 257 given intramuscularly, and the fact that S. au- experimental infections in mice. J. Antibiot. 31:363- as an 372. reus was implicated etiological agent in 4. Hammer, HI, and L Wanger. 1977. Erysipelas and 44% of cases in which a bacteriological diagnosis necrotizing fasciitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 96:409-419. could be made, support the use of a long-acting 5. Laverdiere, M., D. Welter, and L D. Sabath. 1978. cephalosporin in the initial treatment of celluli- Use of a heavy inoculum in the in vitro evaluation of the anti-staphylococcal activity of 19 . tis. Continued use of such a drug is indicated Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13:669-675. when penicil inas-resistant S. aureus is isolated 6. Leitner, F., ML Misiek, T. A. Pursiano, R. E. Buck, D. from the lesions or when diagnostic attempts fail R. Chishohn, R. G. DeRegis, Y. H. Tsaa, and K. E. to disclose the causative organism. Price. 1976. Laboratory evaluation of BL-S786, a ceph- alosporin with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 10:426435. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 7. Pickering, L. K., D. ML O'Connor, D., Anderson, A. We are grateful to Bertha Jones for technical assistance C. Bairan, R. D. Feigin, and J. D. Cherry. 1973. and Mona Thomas for secretarial work. Clinical and pharmacologic evaluation of cefazolin in This work was supported by a grant from Bristol Labora- children. J. Infect. Dis. 128(Suppl):S407-S414. tories. 8. Sabath, L D., C. Wilcox, C. Garner, and M. Finland. 1973. In vitro activity of cefazolin against recent clinical bacterial isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 128(Suppl):S320-S326. LITERATURE CITED 9. Shadomy, S., G. Wagner, andM Carver. 1978. In vitro 1. Baxter, C. R. 1972. Surgical management of soft tissue and in vivo studies with BL-S786, , and cefa- infections. Surg. CJin. North Am. 52:1483-1499. mandole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13:412-415. 2. Burch, K. EL D. Pohlod, L D. Saravolatz, T. Mad- 10. Trentham, D. W., J. W. McCravey, and A. T. Masi. havan, D. Kiani, E. L Quinn, R. D. Busto, J. Car- 1976. Low-dose penicillin for gonococcal arthritis. A denas, and E. J. Fisher. 1979. Ceforanide: in vitro and comparative therapy trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 236: clinical evaluation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 16: 2410-2412. 386-391. 11. Wallace, R. J., R. R. Martin, and S. B. Greenberg. 3. Goering, R. V. C. C. Sanders, and W. E. Sanders, Jr. 1979. Ceforamide (BL-S786) in the treatment of com- 1978. Comparison of BL-S786 with cephalothin, cefa- munity acquired bacterial pneumonia. Infection 7:176- mandole, and cefoxitin in vitro and in treatment of 179.