DOCSLIB.ORG

MCA-Mozambique Monitoring and Evaluation Plan December 10, 2013 (Compact Closeout)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MCA-Mozambique Monitoring and Evaluation Plan December 10, 2013 (Compact Closeout) MCA-Mozambique Monitoring and Evaluation Plan December 10, 2013 (Compact Closeout) Original M&E Plan: 14 April 2009 First Amended M&E Plan: 24 August 2010 Second Amended (Compact Closeout) M&E Plan: 10 December 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... iv 2.0 List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... v 3.0 Compact and Objective Overview ............................................................................................... 1 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 3.2 Program Logic ............................................................................................................................. 2 3.2.1 Water Supply and Sanitation Project Logic ............................................................................ 2 3.2.2 Roads Project Logic ................................................................................................................ 5 3.2.3 Land Tenure Services Project Logic ....................................................................................... 8 3.2.4 Farmer Income Support Project Logic .................................................................................. 11 3.3 Projected Economic Benefits ..................................................................................................... 14 3.3.1 Water Supply and Sanitation Project ERR ............................................................................ 14 3.3.2 Roads Project ERR ................................................................................................................ 15 3.3.3 Land Tenure Services Project ERR ....................................................................................... 16 3.3.4 Farmer Income Support Project ERR .................................................................................... 18 3.3.5 ERR Summary ...................................................................................................................... 18 3.4 Program Beneficiaries ............................................................................................................... 19 3.4.2 Roads Project Beneficiaries .................................................................................................. 19 3.4.3 Land Tenure Services Project Beneficiaries ......................................................................... 20 3.4.4 Farmer Income Support Project Beneficiaries ...................................................................... 20 3.4.5 Beneficiary Summary ............................................................................................................ 21 4.0 Monitoring Component ............................................................................................................. 22 4.1 Summary of Monitoring Strategy .............................................................................................. 22 4.2 Data Quality Reviews ................................................................................................................ 23 4.3 Standard Reporting Requirements ............................................................................................. 24 5.0 Evaluation Component .............................................................................................................. 25 5.1 Summary of Evaluation Strategy ............................................................................................... 25 5.2 Specific Evaluation Plans .......................................................................................................... 26 5.2.1 Water Supply and Sanitation Project Evaluation .................................................................. 26 5.2.2 Roads Rehabilitation Project Evaluation ............................................................................... 29 5.2.3 Land Tenure Services Project Evaluation ............................................................................. 29 5.2.4 Farmer Income Support Project Evaluation .......................................................................... 32 6.0 Implementation and Management of M&E ............................................................................... 34 6.1 Responsibilities .......................................................................................................................... 34 6.2 MCA Management Information System for Monitoring and Evaluation .................................. 36 6.3 Review and Revision of the M&E Plan ..................................................................................... 37 7.0 M&E Budget ............................................................................................................................. 39 Annex I: Indicator Documentation Table ................................................................................................... 42 Annex II: Table of Indicator Baselines and Targets ................................................................................... 73 Annex III: Modification Tables .................................................................................................................. 92 Annex IV: Technical Documentation of Economic Analysis of Water Supply and Sanitation Project ... 185 Annex V Technical Documentation of Economic Analysis of Roads Rehabilitation Project .................. 210 Annex VI: Technical Documentation of Economic Analysis of Land Tenure Services Project .............. 211 Annex VII: Technical Documentation of Economic Analysis of Farmer Income Support Project .......... 216 Table 1: Summary of Water Supply and Sanitation Project Interventions ................................................... 4 Table 2: Compact ERR Summary ............................................................................................................... 18 Table 3: Compact Beneficiary Summary .................................................................................................... 21 Table 4: MCA-Mozambique Program Budget Disaggregated by Project and Activity.............................. 39 Table 5: MCA-Mozambique M&E Budget with Actual Disbursements to date (Expressed in US Dollars) ............................................................................................................................................................ 41 Figure 1: Compact Funded Road Segments of N1 Roads Network .............................................................. 7 Figure 2: Schematic of Sample Frame ........................................................................................................ 28 1.0 Preamble The Millennium Challenge Corporation, on behalf of the United States Government, and the Ministry of Planning and Development, on behalf of the Government of the Republic of Mozambique (the Parties) signed a Compact Agreement (‘Program’) for a US $506.9 million grant to be implemented over a 5 year period. Both parties are committed to a) the shared goal of reducing poverty through economic growth in the four Northern Provinces of Mozambique (Niassa, Cabo Delgado, Nampula, and Zambézia) and b) compact assistance being provided in a manner that strengthens good governance, economic freedom, and investments in the people of Mozambique. The Compact was signed on July 13, 2007 and Entered into Force on September 22, 2008. The compact end date is September 21, 2013. The objectives of the Program include: 1) Increase access to reliable sources of potable water supply and improved sanitation facilities (Water Supply and Sanitation Project), 2): Increase access to productive resources and markets while reducing transport costs (Roads Rehabilitation Project), 3) Establish efficient and secure land access for households, communities, and investors (Land Tenure Services Project), and 4) Protect and restore healthy coconut supply, and diversity farmers’ income (Farmer Income Support Project). iv 2.0 List of Acronyms AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic Média Anual de Tráfego Diário AIAS Water Supply & Sanitation Infrastructure Administração de Infra-estruturas de Água e Authority Saneamento ANE National Roads Authority Administração Nacional de Estradas APR Annual Performance Report Relatório de Desempenho Anual CACM Center for Arbitrage, Reconciliation and Centro de Arbitragem, Conciliação e Mediation Mediação CENACARTA National Centre for Cartography and Centro Nacional de Cartografia e Digitization. Teledetecção CEPAGRI Agricultural Development Centre Centro de Promoção de Agricultura CFJJ Legal and Judicial Training Centre Centro de Formação Jurídica e Judiciária CIF Compact Implementation Fund Fundo de Implementação do Compacto CLF Community Land Fund Fundo Comunitário de Terras CLYD Coconut Lethal Yellowing Disease Doença de Amarelecimento Letal do Coqueiro CTA Confederation of Trade Associations Confederação das Associações Económicas DAR Rural Water Directorate Departamento de Água Rural DAU Urban Water Directorate Departamento de Água Urbana DHS Demographic Health Survey Inquérito Demográfico e de Sade DUAT Land Use Property Rights Certificate Direito de Uso e Aproveitamento de Terra DNEAP National Directorate for Studies and Policy Direcção Nacional de Estudos e Análise de Analysis Políticas
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.4 Mozambique Railway Assessment Railways Overview
    2.4 Mozambique Railway Assessment Railways Overview Page 1 Page 2 The Mozambique Ports and Railways Administration (CFM) was created in 1931. The railway system was developed in order to be connected with the three main ports of Maputo, Beira and Nacala, mainly to provide a fast, safe and efficient transit transportation service for mineral and agriculture exports from South Africa, Zimbabwe and Malawi, and for some national traffic from landlocked provinces. The main railway network is about 2,500 km long, distributed in three systems in the South, Central and North, each with 1,067 mm (3’6”) gauge (cape gauge) that is compatible with neighbouring railways networks. The railway system was designed mainly for goods transportation, i.e. there are little passenger rail services in the country. On the other hand, there is no direct rail connection between the three systems inside Mozambique territory; connections are however available via neighbouring countries. The railways were severely targeted by acts of war after the independence of Mozambique in 1975, first by Rhodesian forces prior to Zimbabwe’s independence in 1980, and then during the civil war in Mozambique which lasted until the nineties. These acts of war inflicted major damages on railway lines and bridges, and on locomotives and wagons that consequently disrupted traffic. Recent extensive infrastructure rehabilitation and locomotive and rolling stock renewal programmes undertaken across all three networks, combined with some strategic management concessions, have brought railways back to adequate operational conditions and to be reliable transportation services. Plans exist to augment the capacity of the current railway system and to build new lines to serve the growing mineral market, which mainly consists of coal from the Tete province.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Crime Compounds Conflict
    WHERE CRIME COMPOUNDS CONFLICT Understanding northern Mozambique’s vulnerabilities SIMONE HAYSOM October 2018 WHERE CRIME COMPOUNDS CONFLICT Understanding northern Mozambique’s vulnerabilities Simone Haysom October 2018 Cover photo: iStock/Katiekk2 Pemba, Mozambique: ranger with a gun looking at feet of elephants after poachers had killed the animals for illegal ivory trade © 2018 Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Global Initiative. Please direct inquiries to: The Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime WMO Building, 2nd Floor 7bis, Avenue de la Paix CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland www.GlobalInitiative.net Contents Summary and key findings ..............................................................................................................................................1 Background .........................................................................................................................................................................................2 The militants and funding from the illicit economy .......................................................................................4 Methodology .....................................................................................................................................................................................5 Corrosion, grievance and opportunity: A detailed picture
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Service Medal - Approved Operations Current As Of: 16 July 2021
    Humanitarian Service Medal - Approved Operations Current as of: 16 July 2021 Operation Start Date End Date Geographic Area1 Honduras, guatamala, Belize, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Hurricanes Eta and Iota 5-Nov-20 5-Dec-20 Nicaragua, Panama, and Columbia, adjacent airspace and adjacent waters within 10 nautical miles Port of Beirut Explosion Relief 4-Aug-20 21-Aug-20 Beirut, Lebanon DoD Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 31-Jan-20 TBD Global Operations / Activities Military personnel who were physically Australian Bushfires Contingency Operations 1-Sep-19 31-Mar-20 present in Australia, and provided and Operation BUSHFIRE ASSIST humanitarian assistance Cities of Maputo, Quelimane, Chimoio, Tropical Cyclone Idai 23-Mar-19 13-Apr-19 and Beira, Mozambique Guam and U.S. Commonwealth of Typhoon Mangkhut and Super Typhoon Yutu 11-Sep-18 2-Feb-19 Northern Mariana Islands Designated counties in North Carolina and Hurricane Florence 7-Sep-18 8-Oct-18 South Carolina California Wild Land Fires 10-Aug-18 6-Sep-18 California Operation WILD BOAR (Tham Luang Nang 26-Jun-18 14-Jul-18 Thailand, Chiang Rai Region Non Cave rescue operation) Tropical Cyclone Gita 11-Feb-18 2-May-18 American Samoa Florida; Caribbean, and adjacent waters, Hurricanes Irma and Maria 8-Sep-17 15-Nov-17 from Barbados northward to Anguilla, and then westward to the Florida Straits Hurricane Harvey TX counties: Aransas, Austin, Bastrop, Bee, Brazoria, Calhoun, Chambers, Colorado, DeWitt, Fayette, Fort Bend, Galveston, Goliad, Gonzales, Hardin, Harris, Jackson, Jasper, Jefferson, Karnes, Kleberg, Lavaca, Lee, Liberty, Matagorda, Montgomery, Newton, 23-Aug-17 31-Oct-17 Texas and Louisiana Nueces, Orange, Polk, Refugio, Sabine, San Jacinto, San Patricio, Tyler, Victoria, Waller, and Wharton.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique Zambia South Africa Zimbabwe Tanzania
    UNITED NATIONS MOZAMBIQUE Geospatial 30°E 35°E 40°E L a k UNITED REPUBLIC OF 10°S e 10°S Chinsali M a l a w TANZANIA Palma i Mocimboa da Praia R ovuma Mueda ^! Lua Mecula pu la ZAMBIA L a Quissanga k e NIASSA N Metangula y CABO DELGADO a Chiconono DEM. REP. OF s a Ancuabe Pemba THE CONGO Lichinga Montepuez Marrupa Chipata MALAWI Maúa Lilongwe Namuno Namapa a ^! gw n Mandimba Memba a io u Vila úr L L Mecubúri Nacala Kabwe Gamito Cuamba Vila Ribáué MecontaMonapo Mossuril Fingoè FurancungoCoutinho ^! Nampula 15°S Vila ^! 15°S Lago de NAMPULA TETE Junqueiro ^! Lusaka ZumboCahora Bassa Murrupula Mogincual K Nametil o afu ezi Namarrói Erego e b Mágoè Tete GiléL am i Z Moatize Milange g Angoche Lugela o Z n l a h m a bez e i ZAMBEZIA Vila n azoe Changara da Moma n M a Lake Chemba Morrumbala Maganja Bindura Guro h Kariba Pebane C Namacurra e Chinhoyi Harare Vila Quelimane u ^! Fontes iq Marondera Mopeia Marromeu b am Inhaminga Velha oz P M úngu Chinde Be ni n è SOFALA t of ManicaChimoio o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o gh ZIMBABWE o Bi Mutare Sussundenga Dondo Gweru Masvingo Beira I NDI A N Bulawayo Chibabava 20°S 20°S Espungabera Nova OCE A N Mambone Gwanda MANICA e Sav Inhassôro Vilanculos Chicualacuala Mabote Mapai INHAMBANE Lim Massinga p o p GAZA o Morrumbene Homoíne Massingir Panda ^! National capital SOUTH Inhambane Administrative capital Polokwane Guijá Inharrime Town, village o Chibuto Major airport Magude MaciaManjacazeQuissico International boundary AFRICA Administrative boundary MAPUTO Xai-Xai 25°S Nelspruit Main road 25°S Moamba Manhiça Railway Pretoria MatolaMaputo ^! ^! 0 100 200km Mbabane^!Namaacha Boane 0 50 100mi !\ Bela Johannesburg Lobamba Vista ESWATINI Map No.
    [Show full text]
  • Delegated Management of Urban Water Supply Services in MOZAMBIQUE
    DELEGATED MANAGEMENT OF URBAN WATER SUPPLY SERVICES IN MOZAMBIQUE SUMMARY OF THE CASE STUDY OF FIPAG & CRA Delegated management of urban water supply services in Mozambique encountered a string of difficulties soon after it was introduced in 1999, but in 2007 a case study revealed that most problems had been overcome and the foundations for sustainability had been established. The government’s strong commitment, the soundness of the institutional reform and the quality of sector leadership can be credited for these positive results. Donor support for investments and institutional development were also important. Results reported here are as of the end of 2007. hen the prolonged civil war in Mozambique ended in exacerbated by the floods of 2000 and delays in the 1992, water supply infrastructure had deteriorated. implementation of new investments – and in December 2001 WIn 1998, the Government adopted a comprehensive SAUR terminated its involvement. Subsequently FIPAG and AdeM’s institutional reform for the development, delivery and regulation remaining partners led by Águas de Portugal (AdeP) renegotiated of urban water supply services in large cities. The new framework, the contracts, introducing higher fees and improvements in the known as the Delegated Management Framework (DMF), was specification of service obligations and procedures. The Revised inaugurated with the creation of two autonomous public bodies: Lease Contract became effective in April 2004, and will terminate an asset management agency (FIPAG) and an independent on November 30, 2014, fifteen years after the starting date of regulator (CRA). the Original Lease Contract. A new Management Contract for the period April 2004 – March 2007 consolidated the four Lease and Management Contracts with Águas de Original Management Contracts.
    [Show full text]
  • An Atlas of Socio-Economic Statistics 1997–2007 Niger Yemen Maidugurin'djamena El Obeid Aden Djibouti Chad Djibouti Nigeria Sudan Adis Abeba Ethiopia
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Mozambique Then and Now and Then Mozambique An Atlas of Socio-Economic Statistics Socio-Economic An of Atlas THE WORLD BANK 1997–2007 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTATÍSTICA NACIONAL INSTITUTO ii Mozambique Then and Now An Atlas of Socio-Economic Statistics 1997–2007 Niger Yemen MaiduguriN'Djamena El Obeid Aden Djibouti Chad Djibouti Nigeria Sudan Adis Abeba Ethiopia Central African Republic Cameroon Bangui MalaboYaounde Equatorial Guinea Somalia Equatorial Guinea Muqdisho Kisangani Uganda Mbandaka Kampala Kenya Gabon Congo Nairobi Port Gentil Rwanda Bujumbura RDC Burundi Mombasa Pointe Noire Kinshasa Brazzaville Kigoma Matadi Kananga Tanzania, United Republic of Dar es Salaam Kahemba Luanda Mtwara Lumumbashi BenguelaHuambo Angola Malawi Lilongwe C.Ilha Moçambique ZambiaLusaka Livingstone Harare Antananarivo Zimbabwe Beira Madagascar Bulawayo Namibia Botswana Toliara Windhoek Gaborone Pretoria Maputo Mbabne Johannesburg Swaziland Kimberley Maseru South Africa Durban Lesotho East London Cape Town Port Elizabeth 0 250 500 1,000 Kilometers iv Mozambique Then and Now contents vi I Preface 39 access to services Access to electricity vii Acknowledgement Access to running water 1 Introduction Access to phones and internet Distance to major urban areas 3 The people of mozambique Population 45 education Demographic distribution by age and gender Trend in primary gross enrollment rates Main languages Primary enrollment by gender Religions
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4: Regional Development Plan
    PART 4: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Chapter 1 Overall Conditions of the Study Area The Study on Upgrading of Nampula – Cuamba Road FINAL REPORT in the Republic of Mozambique November 2007 PART 4: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Chapter 1 Overall Conditions of the Study Area 1.1 Existing Conditions of the Study Area The Study area consists of the two provinces of Niassa and Nampula. The total length of the Study road is approximately 350 km. In this chapter, overall conditions of the study area are described in order to prepare a regional development plan and to analyze economic, social and financial viability. The Nacala Corridor, which extends to Malawi through the Nampula and Niassa Provinces of Mozambique from Nacala Port, serves as a trucking route that connects northern agricultural zones with important cities and/or towns. In the rainy season, which is from November to April, the region has a high rainfall ranging from 1,200 to 2,000 mm. As the Study road is an unpaved road, it is frequently impassable during the rainy season, affecting the transportation of crops during this period. Looking at the 3 regions in Mozambique, results of the economic performance study conducted by UNDP over the period under analysis continue to show heavy economic concentration in the southern region of the country, with an average of about 47% of real production as can be seen in Figure 1.1.1. Within the southern region, Maputo City stands out with a contribution in real terms of about 20.8%. The central region follows, with a contribution of 32%, and finally, the northern region with only 21% of national production.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Country Strategy for Mozambique: 2021-2023
    IOM MOZAMBIQUE IOM COUNTRY STRATEGY FOR MOZAMBIQUE 2021 – 2023 IOM MOZAMBIQUE IOM COUNTRY STRATEGY FOR MOZAMBIQUE 2021 – 2023 The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. Publisher: International Organization for Migration 139, Rua Joseph Kizerbo Maputo Mozambique Email: [email protected] Website: mozambique.iom.int This publication was issued without formal editing by IOM. Report design by We2 – www.we2.co Cover photo: IOM‘s DTM teams help local authorities in Paquitequete, Pemba, register internally displaced persons who fled insecurity in northern Cabo Delgado. From 16 October to 11 November 2020, over 14,400 internally displaced persons arrived at Pemba’s Paquitequete beach by boat. Boat arrivals to the provincial capital peaked with 29 in a single day in late October. © IOM 2021/Matteo THEUBET Required Citation: International Organization for Migration (IOM), 2021. IOM Country Strategy for Mozambique 2021-2023.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Power-Sharing
    Military Power-Sharing Military power-sharing involves sharing military decision-making and/or operational tasks between dierent armed contenders for power; or to proportionally include ethno-national groups or former combatants in ranks and file or command structures. Military power-sharing takes forms such as: Military power-sharing can be an eective tool for • Joint military command structures ending violence because it focuses on including (between state and rebel forces) groups key to the conflict – rather than assuming that rebel groups will unilaterally ‘disarm and • Mergers of state and rebel forces disband’ while the state army remains. • Other forms of group/combatant proportionality in the army and police Case study: Mozambique and associated security force institutions (for example monitoring commissions). CABO DELGADO NIASSA LICHINGA PEMBA NAMPULA TETE NAMPULA Proportion of agreements with military TETE 2 Military power-sharing and its component parts ZAMBEZIA power-sharing MANICA agreements QUELIMANE SOFALA Military power-sharing 13% CHIMOIO BEIRA RENAMO Merger of forces 8% INHAMBANE Joint command structure 5% GAZA FRELIMO INHAMBANE Other proportionality 6% XAI-XAI Sought to merge the forces of RENAMO MAPUTO (rebels) and FRELIMO (state forces) • RENAMO received security guarantees and a “We agree that, as prescribed in the Federation place in the state security forces while FRELIMO Constitution, the Cantonal governments shall maintained elements of control (Manning 2002). ensure that the composition of the police shall • RENAMO combatants transferring to the joint reect that of the population, according to the military were allowed to keep their rank even if the 1991 census, provided that the composition of had not received the training commensurate with the police of each Municipality, shall reect the that position.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Interventions in Rural Mozambique
    Report | no. 360 Report | no. Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Since 2006, the UNICEF–Netherlands Partnership evaluation office. It found evidence of a large Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation has increase in the use of improved water sources been supporting Water Supply and Sanitation and in the ownership and use of latrines. Much of programmes in Mozambique. The largest the increase can be attributed to an innovative programme, the ‘One Million Initiative’ aims to approach to sanitation. However, water from bring improved sanitation and clean water to improved sources and even more importantly, over one million people in rural Mozambique. stored water, are not always safe to drink. An Half-way through the programme, a joint impact element of subsidy will continue to be needed to evaluation was carried out by IOB and UNICEF’s sustain facilities and services. More than Water Published by: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) P.O. box 20061 | 2500 eb The Hague | The Netherlands www.minbuza.nl/iob © Ministry of Foreign Affairs | October 2011| ISBN 978-90-5328-414-8 11Buz283729 | E This project was a product of a cooperation between: Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique More than Water Mid-term impact evaluation: UNICEF – Government of The Netherlands Partnership for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene ‘One Million Initiative’, Mozambique Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Preface Drinking water supply and basic sanitation has been a priority for the Netherlands’ development co-operation and for UNICEF for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Child Survives and Thrives
    GOAL AREA 1 Every child survives and thrives Global Annual Results Report 2019 Cover image: © UNICEF/UN0317965/Frank Dejongh Expression of thanks: © UNICEF/UN0303648/Arcos A mother is washing and cuddling her baby, in the village of On 23 April 2019, in Cucuta in Colombia, a baby undergoes a health Tamroro, in the centre of Niger. check at the UNICEF-supported health centre. In Niger, only 13 percent of the population has access to basic sanitation services. Expression of thanks UNICEF is able to support the realization of children’s rights and change children’s lives by combining high-quality programmes at scale, harnessing innovation and collecting evidence, in partnership with governments, other United Nations organizations, civil society, the private sector, communities and children. It leverages wider change nationally and globally through advocacy, communications and campaigning. UNICEF also builds public support around the world, encouraging people to volunteer, advocate and mobilize resources for the rights and well-being of children, and works with a wide range of partners to achieve even greater impact. UNICEF’s work is funded entirely through the voluntary support of millions of people around the world and our partners in government, civil society and the private sector. Voluntary contributions enable UNICEF to deliver on its mandate to support the protection and fulfilment of children’s rights, to help meet their basic needs, and to expand their opportunities to reach their full potential. We wish to take this opportunity to express deeply felt appreciation to all our many and varied resource partners for support to Goal Area 1 in 2019, and particularly those that were able to provide thematic funding.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Quelimane 3.1 Scope and Methods of the Cost
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized MOZAMBIQUE Public Disclosure Authorized UPSCALING NATURE-BASED FLOOD PROTECTION IN MOZAMBIQUE’S CITIES Cost-Benefit Analyses for Potential Nature-Based Solutions in Nacala and Quelimane January 2020 Public Disclosure Authorized Project Client: World Bank (WB) Project: Consultancy Services for Upscaling Nature-Based Flood Protection in Mozambique’s Cities (Selection No. 1254774) Document Title: Task 3 – Cost-Benefit Analyses for Potential Nature-Based Solutions in Nacala and Quelimane Cover photo by: IL/CES Handling and document control Prepared by CES Consulting Engineers Salzgitter GmbH and Inros Lackner SE (Team Leader: Matthias Fritz, CES) Quality control and review by World Bank Task Team: Bontje Marie Zangerling (Task Team Lead), Brenden Jongman, Michel Matera, Lorenzo Carrera, Xavier Agostinho Chavana, Steven Alberto Carrion, Amelia Midgley, Alvina Elisabeth Erman, Boris Ton Van Zanten, Mathijs Van Ledden Peer Reviewers: Lizmara Kirchner, João Moura Estevão Marques da Fonseca, Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Julie Rozenberg LIST OF CONTENT 1 Introduction 10 2 Nacala 11 2.1 Scope and Methods of the Cost Benefit Analysis 11 2.1.1 Financial Analysis 12 2.1.2 Economic Analysis 12 2.2 Assumptions for Nacala City CBA 12 2.2.1 Revegetation of Land Assumptions 13 2.2.2 Combined Measures Assumptions 16 2.2.3 Benefits 18 2.3 Results 22 Financial Analysis 22 Economic Analysis 25 2.4 Results of the Base Case Scenario 26 2.5 Sensitivity Analysis 28 3 Quelimane 31 3.1 Scope and Methods of the Cost
    [Show full text]