DOCSLIB.ORG

Vine City MARTA Station Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vine City MARTA Station Area FY 2008 Livable Centers Initiative Study Application Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 Including the Ashby MARTA Station, and areas serving the Georgia Dome, the Georgia World Congress Center, the Atlanta University Centre and Washington Park. Sponsor: City of Atlanta Contact: Flor Velarde, City of Atlanta, Department of Planning & Community Development 404-330-673 1 Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 Application City of Atlanta 1. LC1 Application Form Date: November 16,2007 ' Name of responsible organization: City of Atlanta, Department of Planning & Corgmunity Development Name of contact person: Flor Velarde Title: Assistant Director Department: Bureau of Planning . 55 Trinity Avenue, S.W. Suite 3 350 Atlanta, GA 30303-03 1Q Telephone: FAX: E-mail: Non-profit designation: Government Agency . Study area name and location: Vine City MARTA Station Afea LC1 Study, Atlanta GA . a. Total study budget: Funds requestedi ' Cash Match: Is the study proposal consistent with the adopted local Comprehensive Plan? Yes * Signature: Flor Velarde, Assistant Directar Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 Application City of Atlanta 2. Study Area The City of Atlanta's proposal for a Vine City MARXA.#&ticm :~&iz~e~mtehhithive Study area eisompasses a9 sea af appximatdy 1/3 mile diameter around the Vine City MARTA transit station, dong witb an additi.4 mniM extending eastward, which meetthe Vine,City MARTA station mato the Ashby ~~ARTAsfation area. The study location is shown in Figun I. aad mC shdy we& 2io'un"wis shown in Figure 2. I 1x17 I wlm-dq~art attach&. .' The dimemions of the study area are: Length: 1.2 Miles, Washington (OIlie Di.) to Northside Drive Width: Betweea 0.3 rniIe'&dii,$ &lq la&sely defined as the area ck&d.w,Martin Luther Kmg Jr, Bould corridor on the South, aard extending between one to elght blocks to the n& Area: 239 Acres, or The Study area includes: \ Vine City MARTA Transit Station; Ashby MARTA Transit Station; Moms Brown College Campus; Two regionally significant commercial corridors: o Northside Drive; o Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive; A large number of vacant, underutilized properties adjacent to the Ashby MARTA transit station; A developing commercial node adjacent to &e Ashby MARTA station. The Sbdy Area is adjacent to: East: Georgia Dane, ~eArgia~ozd conbe& Center, centennial Park, and the Proposed City Center LC1 area; South: Atlanta University Center, Atlanta Theological Seminary; West: Washington Park, AtIanta BeltLine; North: JSA-McGill LC1 Area, Vine City Neighborhood, English Avenue Neighborhood. Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 Application City of Atlanta Figure 1: Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 Study Area Locator Map Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 Application City of Atlanta 3. Matching Funds The following legislation was passed by the Atlanta City Council, Community Development/Human Resources Committee onL 13,2007 and will be submitted to full Council on November 20, 2007: I1 A RESOLUTION BY COUNCILMEMBER IVORY YOUNG A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO APPLY FOR A LIVABLE CENTERS INITIATIVE (LCI) GRANT FROM THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION (ARC) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED ONE HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($120,000), IN ORDER TO CONDUCT AN LC1 STUDY FOR THE VINE CITY MARTA STATION ACTIVITY NODE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City of Atlanta participates in the Livable Communities Initiative (LCI) program sponsored by the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the LC1 program is to define activity centers and corridors in local jurisdictions to help spur private and public investment in and adjacent to this centeq ,sad , I WHEREAS, the City has received notification from the ARC that funds are available for new LC1 comdor studies; and e- , WHEREAS, the City desires to apply for a grant from the ARC ,in the amount of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars ($120,00) in order to conduct a LC1 stydy for the Vbe City MARTA Station Activity Center; and WHEREAS, in the event that the City r&eives said bt,the kRC requires matching hdsin the amount of Twenty Four Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($24,000); and WHEREAS, the Councilmember for District 3 has identified matching funds for this study.Ji and will be provided fiom the Quality of Life Bond Program NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, as follows: Section 1. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to apply for a Livable Centers Initiative (LC1 ) grant &om the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) in an amount not to exceed $120,000 for the Vine City MARTA Station activity node study. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the LC1 will require matching bdsin the amount of Twenty Four Thousand Dollars and No Cents (24,000), Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 Application City of Atlanta - 4. Issue Statement +-! ' The City of Atlanta is nominating the Vine City MARTA Station Area as a proposed Livable Centers Initiative Area because of the area's potential for transit-supportive redevelopment adjacent to the City Center, combined with its strategic location connecting multiple significant regional activity centers. The study area, while focused on the Vine City MARTA station, area will also include the Ashby MARTA station and portions of the Northside Drive and Martin Luther King JR Drive corridors to maximize linkages and relationships between multiple existing activity centers, neighborhoods, and parks while maximizing the potential for sustainable redevelopment of underutilized areas adjacent to existing transportation infrastructure. I * 1 z. :t The Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 proposal is presents an ideal combination of assets, opportunities and conditions to support the LC1 program goals:: The Vine City and Ashby MARTA Transit Statidrfs are two of the few remaining MARTA rail stations in the Atlanta Metropolitan region without a recent redevelopment emphasizing sustainable mixed-use redevelopment adjacent to an existing high-capacity rail transit station. The neighborhood surrounding the Vine City MARTA Transit Station is characterized by high rates of vacant properties and buildings, and relatively low population densities. Vine City and Ashby MARTA Transit Stations have extremely low rates of ridership, (respectively ranking 31S' and 36" out of 38 Marta stations in terms of average station entries) despite the stations' central location immediately west of Five Points, the center of the MARTA system. This is especially significant in light the area's adjacency to major activity generators. The area's existing transportation idfastructure is extensive and is likely suitable to support increased development. With two existing MARTA Rail Stations, two state-classified arterials (Northside Drive and Martin Luther King Jr Drive) and convenient access to three Interstate Freeways ( Intertates 20, 75, and 85) within one mile. The Vine City MARTA Station Area is adjacent to the Georgia Dome and the Georgia World Congress Center, which, with Centennial Olympic Park, comprise one of the largest convention, sports, and entertainment complexes in the world, hosting more than a million visitors each year. This is great opportunity not only to improve the Vine City Neighborhood, but also actively foster and develop a positive image of the City of Atlanta to over one million international visitors. The Vine City MARTA Station Area encompasses the proposed alignment the multi-use West Side Trail which forms a vital spoke of the City's greenspace and trail plan, linking the City Center and other downtown activity nodes to the proposed BeltLine Transit and recreational system at Washington park. The Vine City MARTA Station Area is immediately adjacent to the Atlanta University Center, the world's largest consortium of predominantly African-American higher education institutions. Redevelopment in the Vine City MARTA Station Area would provide access to Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 Application City of Atlanta transit, housing, shopping, and services to the over 12,000 students, faculty and staff of the Atlanta University Center. The Vine City MARTA station is adjacent to the Herndon Home, one of the City's most significant cultural, historical and architectural resources, which is currently underutilized. The proposed study area includes Morris Brown College campus, which is currently evaluating opportunities to redevelop significant portions of its campus. The Study Area encompasses two regionally significant commercial corridors which have been identified as the targets of mixed-use redevelopment in recent plans. LC1 designation will facilitate implementation of those recommendations. The Vine City MARTA Station Area is likely to experience increased development pressure over the next decade, as several recently completed major development projects, such as those along the Marietta Street Corridor and Ivan Allen Plaza indicate. High density development has been moving west and south from Atlanta's core in recent years. Recent proposals for redevelopment in Castleberry Hill, Peachtree Bottoms Atlanta's "Railroad District" and the "Gulch" (the site of the proposed Multi-Modal Passenger Terminal) suggest that Vine City itself will soon begin to feel redevelopment pressures. Now is the optimum time to create a plan to proactively address these pressures to ensure that development is consistent with regional goals. Study Purpose The Vine City MARTA Station Area LC1 Study will formulate strategies to develop this activity node to create an urban scale, mixed-use node that exemplifies pedestrian-friendly design, provides multi- modal transportation choices and a creates an efficient regional east-west connection linking the City Center to activity centers such as the BeltLine, Washington Park, the recently redeveloped Historic WestSide Village, and the Atlanta University Center. The strategies would assist surrounding neighborhoods and employment centers with streetscape improvements and increased connectivity, while leveraging the area's relationship with the Georgia Dome 1 GWCC sports, convention & entertainment complex to create an integrated, sustainable, and vibrant 24 hour community. Desired Outcomes There are several primary outcomes that are expected of this study: , I,.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT
    Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT Estimated Capital Cost (Base Year in Estimated O&M Cost (Base Year in Millions) Millions) Project Description Total Miles Local Federal O&M Cost Over 20 Total Capital Cost Annual O&M Cost Share Share Years Two (2) miles of heavy rail transit (HRT) from HE Holmes station to a I‐20 West Heavy Rail Transit 2 $250.0 $250.0 $500.0 $13.0 $312.0 new station at MLK Jr Dr and I‐285 Seven (7) miles of BRT from the Atlanta Metropolitan State College Northside Drive Bus Rapid Transit (south of I‐20) to a new regional bus system transfer point at I‐75 7 $40.0 N/A $40.0 $7.0 $168.0 north Clifton Light Rail Four (4) miles of grade separated light rail transit (LRT) service from 4 $600.0 $600.0 $1,200.0 $10.0 $240.0 Contingent Multi‐ Transit* Lindbergh station to a new station at Emory Rollins Jurisdicitional Projects I‐20 East Bus Rapid Three (3) miles of bus rapid transit (BRT) service from Five Points to 3 $28.0 $12.0 $40.0 $3.0 $72.0 Transit* Moreland Ave with two (2) new stops and one new station Atlanta BeltLine Twenty‐two (22) miles of bi‐directional at‐grade light rail transit (LRT) 22 $830 $830 $1,660 $44.0 $1,056.0 Central Loop service along the Atlanta BeltLine corridor Over three (3) miles of bi‐directional in‐street running light rail transit Irwin – AUC Line (LRT) service along Fair St/MLK Jr Dr/Luckie St/Auburn 3.4 $153 $153 $306.00 $7.0 $168.0 Ave/Edgewood Ave/Irwin St Over two (2) miles of in‐street bi‐directional running light rail transit Downtown – Capitol
    [Show full text]
  • Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)
    School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit Contract and Assistance Agreement and Amendments
    RAPID TRANSIT CONTRACT AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENTS Amendment Effective Date Description 1 December 21, 1973 Relocation of Vine City Station, addition of Techwood Station, and changing Tucker-North DeKalb Busway to rapid rail line 2 April 15, 1974 Consolidation of Piedmont Road and Lindbergh Drive Stations into one station 3 August 21,1974 Relocation of Northside Drive Station 4 October 10, 1978 Addition of Airport Station 5 September 1, 1979 Construction Priorities mandated by Legislation 6 May 27, 1980 Permits extension of System into Clayton County and waives “catch-up” payments 7 October 1, 1980 Relocation of Fairburn Road Station 8 June 1, 1983 Construction Priorities 9 May 11, 1987 Realignment of East Line between Avondale Yard and Kensington Station, deletion of North Atlanta busway and addition of North Line, and modification of Proctor Creek Line 10 March 14, 1988 Relocation of Doraville Station 11 August 29, 1990 Extension of the Northeast Line to and within Gwinnett County 12 April 24, 2007 Extended sales tax through June 30, 2047 and added West Line BRT Corridor, I-20 East BRT Corridor, Beltline Rail Corridor and Clifton Corridor rail segment 13 November 5, 2008 Amended I-20 East Corridor from BRT to fixed guideway; added Atlanta Circulation Network; extended fixed guideway segment north along Marietta Blvd; extended the North Line to Windward Parkway; added a fixed guideway segment along the Northern I-285 Corridor in Fulton and DeKalb Counties; extended the Northeast Line to the DeKalb County Line 14 December
    [Show full text]
  • Served Proposed Station(S)
    CURRENT PROPOSED ROUTE NAME JURISDICTION PROPOSED MODIFICATION STATION(S) STATION(S) SERVED SERVED Discontinue Service -N ew proposed Routes 21 and 99 would provide service along Jesse Hill Ave., Coca Cola Pl. and Piedmont Ave. segments. New proposed Route 99 would provide service along the Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. segment. New proposed Routes 32 and 51 would provide service on Marietta St. between Forsyth St. and Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. New proposed Route 12 would provide service on the Howell Mill Rd segment between 10th St. and Marietta Chattahoochee Ave.. New proposed Route 37 would provide service on Chattahoochee Ave. between Hills Ave. and Marietta Blvd and Marietta Blvd City of Atlanta, 1 Boulevard/Centennial between Bolton Dr. and Coronet Way. New proposed Routes 37 and 60 would provide service on Coronet Way between Marietta Blvd and Bolton Rd Georgia State Fulton County Olympic Park segments. Service will no longer be provided on Edgewood Ave. between Piedmont Ave. and Marietta St.; Marietta St. between Edgewood Ave. and Forsyth St.; Marietta St. between Ivan Allen, Jr. Blvd and Howell Mill Rd; Howell Mill Rd between Marietta St. and 10th St.; Huff Rd, Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Marietta Blvd; Chattahoochee Ave. between Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Hill Ave.; Bolton Pl., Bolton Dr.; Coronet Way between Defoors Ferry Rd and Moores Mill Rd, and Moores Mill Rd between Bolton Rd and Coronet Way. Proposed modification includes Route 2 operate from Inman Park station via Moreland Ave. (currently served by Route 6-Emory) Freedom Parkway and North Avenue, North Avenue City of Atlanta, 2 Ponce De Leon Avenue Ralph McGill Blvd (currently served by Route 16-Noble), continuing via Blvd,and North Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report For the Year Ended June 30 2011 “MARTA...The transportation choice of the Atlanta Region” Regionaltransitleadershipofuniquecompetenceandcompetitiveness Safe,reliableandcustomer-friendlyservice Increasingregionalqualityoflifeandeconomicsuccess VisionRespectedandvaluedregionalpartnerwithuniqueexpertise he mission of the Metropolitan Atlanta TRapid Transit Authority is to strengthen communities, advance economic competitive- ness, and respect the environment by pro- Missionviding a safe and customer-focused regional transit system. Page2 Table of Contents Board of Directors ........................................................................................4 Message from the General Manager/CEO ....................................................5 My MARTA...Gets Me Where I’m Going and Improves My Quality of Life ......6 My MARTA...Protects the Environment .......................................................10 My MARTA...Cares About the Community It Serves ....................................14 My MARTA...Contributes to Our Regional and State Economy ...................20 My MARTA...Is the Backbone of Regional Transit ........................................24 My MARTA...Makes Safety and Security a Priority ......................................26 My MARTA...Strives for Excellence .............................................................30 Financial Highlights .....................................................................................34 Fare Structure .............................................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • Emerald Corridor Foundation by the Urban Land Institute’S Center for Leadership May 15, 2017 Mtap Team Table of Contents
    Bankhead MARTA Station mTAP Prepared for the Emerald Corridor Foundation by the Urban Land Institute’s Center for Leadership May 15, 2017 mTAP Team Table of Contents Nicole McGhee Hall, CPSM 1. mTAP Overview .................................3 Principal Nickel Works Consulting, LLC 2. Neighborhood Overview ....................4 Heather Hubble, RA, AIA, LEED AP Assistant Director of Architecture 3. Study Area Overview .........................10 Tunnell-Spangler-Walsh & Associates 4. Previous Redevelopment Plans .........13 Wole Oyenuga CEO Sims Real Estate Group 5. Recommendations ............................15 Janae Sinclair Development Manager Fuqua Development, LP Coleman Wood Communications Professional Jackson Spalding 2 1. mTAP Overview Purpose of mTAP will be catalytic to community redevelop- ment and improve pedestrian connectivity After decades of disinvestment, Atlanta’s within the area. Westside neighborhoods are on the verge of a renaissance. Much of the recent Process focus has been on the neighborhoods in the shadow of the new Mercedes-Benz Research Stadium. Not to be overlooked, the neigh- • Environmental borhoods to the northwest of Vine City and • Transit English Avenue are seeing their own civic • Zoning investment, albeit oat a slower pace. • Vested development • Demographics Less than a mile from the Bankhead • Previous studies MARTA Transit Station three important • neighborhood infrastructure projects are in the planning stages. Site Visits • Pedestrian trends 1. The Proctor Creek Greenway: a 7.5- • State of study area mile multi-use trail and green corridor • Site survey • Neighborhood tours 2. Westside Reservoir Park: A 300-acre park that will include the conversion Stakeholder Interviews of the former Bellwood Quarry into a • MARTA reservoir. • City of Atlanta 3. Atlanta Beltline: The 22-mile multi-use • Atlanta Beltline trail that is transforming intown neigh- • Non-profits borhoods throughout Atlanta.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankhead Marta Station Transit Area Lci Study
    CITY OF ATLANTA January 5, 2006 BBANKHEADANKHEAD MARTAMARTA STATIONSTATION TTRANSITRANSIT AAREAREA LCILCI SSTUDYTUDY Prepared for the CITY OF ATLANTA, Bureau of Planning by HDR, INC. TUNNELL-SPANGLER-WALSH & ASSOCIATES MARKETEK, INC. DOVETAIL CONSULTING Shirley Franklin Mayor, City of Atlanta Atlanta City Council Lisa Borders President of Council Carla Smith Debi Starnes Ivory Lee Young Jr Cleta Winslow Natalyn Mosby Archibong Anne Fauver Howard Shook Clair Muller Felicia A. Moore C.T. Martin Jim Maddox Joyce Sheperd Ceasar C. Mitchell Mary Norwood H. Lamar Willis Department of Planning & Community Develompent James Shelby, Acting Commissioner Bureau of Planning Beverly Dockeray-Ojo, Director City Manager Bryan Kerlin BBANKHEADANKHEAD MARTAMARTA STATIONSTATION TTRANSITRANSIT AAREAREA LCILCI SSTUDYTUDY Table of Contents Section 1: Inventory and Analysis 1.1 Overview 1:1 1.2 Policies and Projects 1:4 1.3 Land Use 1:7 1.4 Transportation 1:15 1.5 Urban Design & Historic Resources 1:28 1.6 Infrastructure & Facilities 1:33 1.7 Markets & Housing 1:37 Section 2: Visioning 2.1 Methodology & Process 2:1 2.2 Community Visioning 2:7 2.3 Goals and Objectives 2:13 Section 3: Recommendations 3.1 Overview 3:1 3.2 General Recommendations 3:3 3.3 Markets & Housing Recommendations 3:4 3.4 Land Use Recommendations 3:7 3.5 Transportation Recommendations 3:10 3.6 Urban Design Recommendations 3:17 3.7 Infrastructure & Facilities Recommendations 3:18 Section 4: Implementation 4.1 Action Program 4:1 4.2 Land Use and Zoning Changes 4:12 4.3 Employment & Population
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development an Urban Design Assessment of Transit Stations in Atlanta
    Transit-Oriented Development An Urban Design Assessment of Transit Stations in Atlanta Allen Daniel Braswell II Transit-Oriented Development An Urban Design Assessment of Transit Stations in Atlanta Allen Daniel Braswell II An Applied Research Paper Presented to the Faculty of the School of City and Regional Planning Georgia Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfi llment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of City and Regional Planning Advisor: Richard Dagenhart April 25, 2013 I would thank my advisor Richard Dagenhart, without his guidance and wisdom this paper would not have been possible. I would like to thank my beautiful fi ancée, Holly Krook, for her enduring support and encouragement. Lastly, I would like to thank my parents, Allen and Mary, without them I would not be where I am today. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 1 Chapter 1 Literature Review 3 Chapter 2 TOD Principles and Guidelines 11 Chapter 3 Research Overview 19 Chapter 4 Station Analysis 23 Conclusion 63 References 65 ABSTRACT In the late 1980s, Peter Calthorpe reintroduced and codifi ed the idea of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). While other designers and planners had supported similar ideas, it was Calthorpe, who popularized and coined the concept of TODs when he authored “The New American Metropolis in 1993 (Carlton 2007). He further developed and expanded the notion in the “The Regional City” 2001 and “Urbanism in the Age of Climate Change” 2011. He viewed TODs as the holistic alternative to sprawl (Calthorpe, The New Amercian Metropolis 1993), not only providing a pleasant and walkable neighborhood, but also providing an economic, ecological, and social foundation for regional development.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTENDEE & PROSPECTIVE EXHIBITORS Faqs
    ATTENDEE & PROSPECTIVE EXHIBITORS FAQs TABLE OF CONTENTS General: Page 2 COVID Safety: Page 6 • What are the dates of 2021 GlassBuild America? • What is NGA doing to ensure the health and safety • Where is the GlassBuild expo taking place? of exhibitors and attendees? • When is the expo open? • What is the GWCC doing to protect attendees? • What type of professionals attend GlassBuild? • Will you take my temperature? • Is First Aid available at the venue? Registration & Badges: Pages 2-3 • Can anyone attend the expo? Misc: Page 7 • May children attend GlassBuild America? • Can I find a place to buy a drink or lunch at the • What are the registration fees to attend? venue? • How can I take advantage of the NGA Member • Is there a business center at the venue if someone discount? wants to make copies, etc? • How does my company become a member to get • Will security guards be around throughout the complimentary entrance to the trade show? event? • How do I register? • Does NGA provide babysitting services? • When will registration be open to pick-up event • May photographs or video be taken on the trade materials? show floor or in a session? • Is there a one-day “trade show only” registration? • Since the Glazing Executives Forum and the NGA Prospective Exhibitors: Pages 7-10 Glass Conference are taking place alongside • How do I become an exhibitor? GlassBuild, can I register for both at the same • Who do I contact to secure sponsorship/branding time? opportunities? • Can I transfer my registration to someone other • What are the benefits
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Statewide Transit Plan Improving Access and Mobility in 2050
    Georgia Statewide Transit Plan Improving Access and Mobility in 2050 Existing Conditions and Future Trends Analysis Part I – State Profile Report Final Report May 2020 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended, and in part by the taxes of the citizens of the State of Georgia. Page Intentionally Left Blank May 2020 Georgia Statewide Transit Plan | Final Existing Conditions and Future Trends Analysis Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .................................................... 1-1 3.2.1 Unemployment Rates ........................................ 3-5 1.1 Public Transit in Georgia ......................................... 1-1 3.2.2 Employment by Industry .................................... 3-5 1.2 Demographic Trends ............................................... 1-1 3.3 Socioeconomic Conditions ..................................... 3-10 1.3 Existing Plans .......................................................... 1-2 3.3.1 Minority Populations ........................................ 3-12 1.4 Emerging Trends, Opportunities, and Challenges .... 1-2 3.3.2 Low-Income Populations ................................. 3-13 2.0 Overview of Transit in Georgia .................................... 2-1 3.3.3 Limited-English Proficiency Populations .......... 3-14 2.1 Existing Public Transit Service ................................. 2-2 3.3.4 Populations with Disabilities
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Participant Instructions Welcome
    2021 PARTICIPANT INSTRUCTIONS WELCOME Hello and welcome to the 52nd Running of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution Peachtree Road Race! On behalf of Atlanta Track Club, we are excited to have you join us as we celebrate this Atlanta tradition. Atlanta Track Club, our event sponsors, our organizing committee, the City of Atlanta, and more than 3,500 dedicated volunteers are look- ing forward to making this year’s event unforgettable for all participants. Since the cancellation of the in-person run- ning of the Peachtree in 2020, we have been working closely with the mayor’s office of emergency management, the city’s police and fire departments, Fulton County Emergency Management Agency, emergency medical service units, and other health and safety organizations to establish race guidelines and procedures related to Covid-19, weather, and other possible issues to ensure a safe event for all. We ask that you pay close attention to our Event Alert System, which is a color-coded flag system located at the start line and at hydration stations along the course and the finish. We ask all participants to respect our mask requirement in the start and finish line areas and remind you that no mask is required during the race itself. All of us at Atlanta Track Club wish you well on the remainder of your training and we look forward to seeing you at the event! Be safe, Rich Kenah Race Director 1 BEFORE THE EVENT MAILED NUMBERS No race numbers will be shipped in 2021. All numbers must be picked up at the Peachtree Road Race Health & Fitness Expo presented by Publix or on race day at race number pickup.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW DOES TRANSPORTATION AFFORDABILITY VARY AMONG TODS, TADS, and OTHER AREAS? Final Report
    HOW DOES TRANSPORTATION AFFORDABILITY VARY AMONG TODS, TADS, AND OTHER AREAS? Final Report NITC-RR-859 by Brenda Scheer (PI) Reid Ewing Keunhyun Park Shabnam Sifat Ara Khan University of Utah for National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 August 2017 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NITC-RR-859 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date August 2017 How does transportation affordability vary among TODs, TADs, and other areas? 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Brenda Scheer (PI), Reid Ewing, Keunhyun Park, and Shabnam Sifat Ara Khan 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of City & Metropolitan Planning 11. Contract or Grant No. University of Utah NITC-UU-08 375 South 1530, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Transit-oriented development (TOD) has gained popularity worldwide as a sustainable form of urbanism; it concentrates development near a transit station so as to reduce auto-dependency and increase ridership. Existing travel behavior studies in the context of TOD, however, are limited in terms of small sample size, inconsistent TOD classification methods, and failure to control for residential self-selection. Thus, this study has three research questions. First, how can we distinguish between Transit-oriented development (TOD) and Transit-adjacent development (TAD)? Second, how do travel behaviors vary between TODs and TADs? Third, how does transportation affordability vary between TODs and TADs? This study utilizes cluster analysis to classify station area types and propensity score matching to control residential self-selection.
    [Show full text]