Results of Combustion and Emissions Testing When

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Results of Combustion and Emissions Testing When ANUESD-22 NREUP-430-6322~ Results of Combustion and Emissions Testing when Co-Firing Blends of Binder-Enhanced Densified Refuse-Derived Fuel (b-dRDF) Pellets and Coal in a 440 MW, Cyclone Fired Combustor Volume 3: Appendices A Joint Effort Energy Systems Division National Renewable Argonne National Laboratory Energy Laboratory A Operated by the University of Chicago Managed by Midwest Research Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy for the US. Department of Energy under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38 under Contract DE-AC36-83CH10093 Author: 0. Ohlsson Technical Monitor: Philip B. Shepherd Argonne National Laboratory and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory are part of the national laboratory system of the US. Department of Energy. ANUESD-22 NREUTP-430-6322c UC Category: 249 DE94011845 Results of Combustion and Emissions Testing when Co-Firing Blends of Binder-Enhanced Densified Refuse-Derived Fuel (b-dRDF) Pellets and Coal in a 440 MW, Cyclone Fired Combustor Volume 3: Appendices 0. Ohlsson Energy Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, I hois 60439 Technical Monitor: Philip 8. Shepherd A Joint Effort 64 ** Energy Systems Division '* National Renewable Argonne National Laboratory e+-91 Energy Laboratory Operated by the University of Chicago Managed by Midwest Research Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38 under Contract DE-AC36-83CH10093 This report was prepared under Task #WM41.1010 and Subcontract #DA-l-l1 1 57-1 July, 1994 This publication was reproduccd from the best available camera-ready copy submitted by the subcontractor and received no editorial review ai NW. NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liabilrty or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from: Office of Scientific and Technical information (OSTl) P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Prices available by calling (615) 576-8401 Available to the public from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 (703) 487-4650 I* $2 Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper including 10% postconsumer waste Foreword This report contains the data resulting from the co-firing of b-dRDF pellets and coal in a MO-MW, cyclone-fired combustor. these tests were conducted under a Collaborative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA). The CRADA partners included the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE),National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NFLEL), Argonne National Laboratory (ANL),Otter Tail Power Company, Green Isle Environmental, Inc., XL Recycling Corporation, and Marblehead Lime Company. The report is made up of three volumes. Volume 1 contains a description of the test facility, the test program, test results, and study conclusions and recommendations; Volume 2 contains the fieid data and laboratory analysis of each individual run; Volume 3 contains other supporting information, along with quality assurance documentation and safety and test plans. With this multi-volume approach, readers can find information at the desired level of detail, depending on individual interest or need. iii Table of Contents Foreword ............................................................ iii Appendix A: Volumetric Flow Rate Determinations .............................. A-1 Appendix B: Stack Sampling Test Ports ...................................... B-1 Appendix C: Field Data Sheets ............................................ C-1 Appendix D: Interpoll Laboratories Analytical Data .............................. D-1 Appendix E: Continuous Emission Monitoring Data .............................. E- 1 Appendix F: Triangle Laboratories Analytical Data .............................. F-1 Appendix G: Chain of Custody Forms ....................................... G-1 Appendix H: GEM Calibration Specifications .................................. €3-1 Appendix I: Boiler Operational Data ......................................... 1-1 Appendix J: Sampling and Analyses Methods .................................. J-1 Appendix K: Calculation Equations ......................................... K-1 Appendix L: Sampling Train Calibration Data .................................. L-I Appendix M: Statement of Work for Field Testing and Analytical Services .............. M-1 Appendix N: Quality AssurancdQuality Control Plans ............................ N-1 Appendix 0: Safety Plans ................................................ 0-1 Appendix P: Additional Analyses Conducted on Samples Collected on October 26 and October 27. 1992 ................................... P-1 iv Appendix A: Volumetric Flow Rate Determinations Interpol1 Labs Report No . 2-7328 Argonne National Labs / OTP Big Stone Big Stone. South Uakota Test No . 3 No . 1 8oiler Stack Results of Volumetric Flow Rate Determination....... Uethod 2 Date of Determination............ 10-26-92 Time of Determination....... (HRS) 800 Barometric pressure .......(IN.HGJ 28.71 Pitot tube coefficient ........... .84 Number of sarnpl ing ports ......... 4 Total number of points ........... 12 Shape of duct .................... Round Stack diameter ............... (IN) 290 Duct area ................. (SQ-FT) 458.69 Direction of flow ................ UP Static pressure ...........(1N.WC) -1.5 Avg . gas temp ............. (DEG-F) 297 Moisture content ..........(% V/V) 13.98 Avg. linear velocity ..... (FT/SEC) 80.1 Gas density .............. (LB/ACF) . 04953 Molecular weight ......(LB/LBMOLE) 30.33 Mass flow of gas .......... (LB/HR) 6554101 Volumetric flow rate. ............ actual ................... (ACFM) 2205357 dry standard ............ (DSCFM) 1264819 A-1 Interpol1 Labs Report No . 2-7328 Argonne National Labs / OTP Big Stone Big Stone. South Dakota Test No . 8 No . I Boiler Stack Results of Volumetric Flow Rate Determination....... Method 2 Date of Determination............ 10-27-92 Time of Determinatton ....... (HRS) 815 Barometric pressure ....... (1N.HG) 28.46 Pitot tube coefficient ........... .04 Number of sampling ports ......... 4 Total number of points ........... 12 Shape of duct .................... Round Stack diameter ............... (IN) 290 Duct area ................. (SQ.FT) 458.69 Direction of flow ................ UP Static pressure ...........(1N.WC) -1.5 Avg . gas temp ............. (DEG-F) 294 Moisture content.. ........ (% V/V) 15.25 Avg . linear veloclty ..... (FT/SEC) 78.2 Gas density ..............(LB/ACF) . 04088 Molecular weight ...... (LB/LBMOLE) 30.24 Mass flow of gas ..........(LB/HR) 6312633 Volumetric flow rate ............. actual ................... (ACFM) 2152316 dry standard ............ (DSCFM) 1210238 A-2 Appendix B: Stack Sampling Test Parts Appendix C : Field Data Sheets Appendix D: Interpoll Laboratories Analytical Data Appendix E: Continuous Emission Monitoring Data The CEM data is reported in this appendix. The data logger printed reports for the SOz, NO,, CO, C02, and 0, are presented first followed by copies of the strip charts. The SO, readings for October 27 exhibit a discrepency between the data logger data and the strip charts. The data collected on the strip chart is considered valid and was the data reported. A1 1 other data logger parameters were cross-checked and found to be valid. Following the SOt, NO,, CO, Cot# and O2 printouts and strip charts is the total hydrocarbon data. The charts were read and the results tabularized. copies of the strip charts follow these results. E-1 Appendix F: Triangle Laboratories Analytical Data TRIANGLE LABORATORIES OF RTP, INC. 801 CAPITOLA DRm DDRHAM, NC 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 Fax: (919) 544-5493, DATE : * NOVEMBER 30, 1992 CLIENT ID : * INTERPOLL LABS P.0. mER: * 16934KE TLI PROJECT No. : * 22314 CASE NARRATIVE MODEL 8290X 0 0 0 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR THE PRESENCE OF 0 0 0 0 POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZO-g-DIOXINS 0 0 0 0 AND 0 0 0 0 DIBENZOFURANS 0 0 0 0 BY 0 0 0 0 HIGE-RESOLUTION GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY 1 0 0 HIGB-RESOLUTION MASS SPECTROMETRY 0 0 0 F- 1 TRIANGLE LABORATORIES OF RTP, INC, NOVEMBER 30, 1992 CASE NARRATIVE 22314 Eight MM5 samples were received from INTERPOLL LABS in good condition November 4, 1992 and stored in a refrigerator at 4OC. The samples were extracted and analyzed according to procedures described in the Triangle Labs User Manual provided with this data package. Any particular difficulties encountered during the sample handling by Triangle Labs will be discussed in the QC remark section below. A laboratory method blank -- identified as the TLf MM5 Blank -- is prepared along with the samples, The release of this particular set of INTERPOLL LABS analytical data by Triangle Labs was authorized by the Quality Control Chemist who has reviewed each sample data package
Recommended publications
  • Exploring Small-Scale Chemostats to Scale up Microbial Processes: 3-Hydroxypropionic Acid Production in S
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title Exploring small-scale chemostats to scale up microbial processes: 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in S. cerevisiae. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/43h8866j Journal Microbial cell factories, 18(1) ISSN 1475-2859 Authors Lis, Alicia V Schneider, Konstantin Weber, Jost et al. Publication Date 2019-03-11 DOI 10.1186/s12934-019-1101-5 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Lis et al. Microb Cell Fact (2019) 18:50 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1101-5 Microbial Cell Factories RESEARCH Open Access Exploring small-scale chemostats to scale up microbial processes: 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in S. cerevisiae Alicia V. Lis1, Konstantin Schneider1,2, Jost Weber1,3, Jay D. Keasling1,4,5,6,7, Michael Krogh Jensen1 and Tobias Klein1,2* Abstract Background: The physiological characterization of microorganisms provides valuable information for bioprocess development. Chemostat cultivations are a powerful tool for this purpose, as they allow defned changes to one single parameter at a time, which is most commonly the growth rate. The subsequent establishment of a steady state then permits constant variables enabling the acquisition of reproducible data sets for comparing microbial perfor- mance under diferent conditions. We performed physiological characterizations of a 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain in a miniaturized and parallelized chemostat cultivation system. The physi- ological conditions under investigation were various growth rates controlled by diferent nutrient limitations (C, N, P). Based on the cultivation parameters obtained subsequent fed-batch cultivations were designed. Results: We report technical advancements of a small-scale chemostat cultivation system and its applicability for reliable strain screening under diferent physiological conditions, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Microscope Compatible Cell-Culture Incubator
    Microscope Compatible Cell-Culture Incubator BME 400 December 14th, 2016 Client: Dr. John Puccinelli, UW-Madison Dept. of Biomedical Engineering Advisor: Dr. Mitchell Tyler, UW-Madison Dept. of Biomedical Engineering Team Members: Trevor Zarecki - Team Leader Jenny Westlund - Communicator Peter Hartig - BPAG Jack McGinnity - BWIG Steve Gock - BSAC Abstract Live cell imaging experiments are difficult to perform over long periods of time on normal lab microscopes without incubation capabilities. Current commercial microscope-stage incubators are expensive, not compatible with multiple microscopes and ineffective at evenly controlling the environment. The client desires an inexpensive incubation chamber compatible with cell microscopy that is capable of maintaining desired temperature, CO2, and humidity evenly throughout the chamber. The device should not alter image quality, and should be accessible for changing media or cell culture dishes. An initial prototype has been developed that involves a small, cohesive system to regulate temperature, CO2, and humidity. Testing of the current prototype has demonstrated regulation of these three systems, through an automated feedback system capable of maintaining the system near a physiological set point. Further development of the design will ensure that it performs efficiently according to all specifications, and ultimately help bridge the gap in the market between high-cost, functional incubation systems and cheaper, less effective designs. 1 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Motivation 3 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Contamination Control with CO2 Incubators
    WHITE PAPER No. 30 Effective Contamination Control with CO2 Incubators Ines Kristina Hartmann¹, James Jarvis² ¹Eppendorf AG, ²Eppendorf, Inc. Executive Summary CO2 incubators provide an optimal cell growth environ- ment by maintaining a humidified atmosphere with temperature and carbon dioxide control. These conditions not only promote cell growth, but also the growth of contaminants, like bacteria, yeast, molds and other fungi. The contamination-reducing features of an incubator’s functional design and the effectiveness of its self-decon- tamination system must be considered in choosing an instrument. In this paper, we compare various strategies for preventing contamination in CO2 incubators, from the functional design of the device to self-disinfection programs. We also give some useful tips to prevent contamination when using CO2 incubators. Introduction Sources of contamination How do contaminants get into a CO2 incubator? Contamination is a major cause of frustration when culturing The CO2 incubator may become an indirect source of con- cells. There are many sources of contamination, either direct tamination. Unlike a biological safety cabinet, an incubator or indirect. Direct sources are contaminated reagents, media cannot prevent the influx of airborne contaminants, as the or seed culture. Media and reagents from reputable suppliers door must be opened during routine use. The incubator are rarely delivered contaminated nowadays. New cell lines chamber can also be contaminated by carelessness in aseptic can introduce contaminants into the lab, especially when techniques, and unnoticed splashes from cell culture vessels. they are given from lab to lab. They should be quarantined Some CO2 incubators use a HEPA filter to remove microor- before culturing with the rest of the cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiology Laboratory Exercises Third Edition 2020
    MICROBIOLOGY Laboratory Exercises Third Edition Keddis & Rauschenbach 2020 Photo Credits (in order of contribution): Diane Davis, Ines Rauschenbach & Ramaydalis Keddis Acknowledgements: Many thanks to those in the Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, who have through the years inspired our enthusiasm for the science and teaching of microbiology, with special thanks to Diane Davis, Douglas Eveleigh and Max Häggblom. Safety: The experiments included in this manual have been deemed safe by the authors when all necessary safety precautions are met. The authors recommend maintaining biosafety level 2 in the laboratory setting and using risk level 1 organisms for all exercises. License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License Microbiology Laboratory Exercises Third Edition 2020 Ramaydalis Keddis, Ph.D. Ines Rauschenbach, Ph.D. Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey CONTENTS PAGE Introduction Schedule ii Best Laboratory Practices Iii Working in a Microbiology Laboratory iv Exercises Preparation of a Culture Medium 1 Culturing and Handling Microorganisms 3 Isolation of a Pure Culture 5 Counting Bacterial Populations 8 Controlling Microorganisms 10 Disinfectants 10 Antimicrobial Agents: Susceptibility Testing 12 Hand Washing 14 The Lethal Effects of Ultraviolet Light 15 Selection of Fungi from Air 17 Microscopy 21 Morphology and Staining of Bacteria 26 Microbial Metabolism 30 Enzyme Assay 32 Metabolic
    [Show full text]
  • METHODS & STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (Sops)
    METHODS & STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOPs) OF EMISSION TESTING IN HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR FOREWARD COVR PAGE TEAM CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO Chapter - 1 Stack Monitoring – Material And Methodology For Isokinetic Sampling 1-28 Chapter - 2 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) For Particulate Matter Determination 29-38 Chapter - 3 Determination Of Hydrogen Halides (Hx) And Halogens From Source Emission 39-54 Chapter - 4 Standard Operating Procedure For The Sampling Of Hydrogen Halides And Halogens From Source Emission 55-61 Determination Of Metals And Non Metals Emissions From Chapter - 5 Stationarysources 62-79 Standard Operating Procedure (Sop) For Sampling Of Metals And Non Chapter - 6 Metals & 80-97 Standard Operating Procedure (Sop) Of Sample Preparation For Analysis Of Metals And Non Metals Chapter - 7 Determination Of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-P-Dioxins And 98-127 Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans Standard Operating Procedure For Sampling Of Polychlorinated Chapter - 8 Dibenzo-P-Dioxins And Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans & 128-156 Standard Operating Procedure For Analysis Of Polychlorinated Dibenzo- P-Dioxins And Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans Project Team 1. Dr. B. Sengupta, Member Secretary - Overall supervision 2. Dr. S.D. Makhijani, Director - Report Editing 3. Sh. N.K. Verma, Ex Additional Director - Project co-ordination 4. Sh. P.M. Ansari, Additional Director - Report Finalisation 5. Dr. D.D. Basu, Senior Scientist - Guidance and supervision 6. Sh. Paritosh Kumar, Sr. Env. Engineer - Report processing 7. Sh. Dinabandhu Gouda, Env. Engineer - Data compilation, analysis and preparation of final report 8. Sh. G. Thirumurthy, AEE - - do - 9. Sh. Abhijit Pathak, SSA - - do - 10. Ms. Trapti Dubey, Jr. Professional (Scientist) - - do - 11. Er. Purushotham, Jr. Professional (Engineer) - - do - 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Guidance for Microbiology Incubators
    DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Laboratory Accreditation Program Document Number: # Title: Microbiology Incubator Guidance Effective Date: Date Authority: 27 Pa.C.S. §§ 4101 – 4113 (relating to environmental laboratory accreditation), Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Regulations, 25 Pa. Code Chapter 252 Policy: It is the policy of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to provide laboratory management personnel with the information necessary to either obtain or maintain accreditation to perform and report environmental analyses in Pennsylvania. Purpose: This technical guidance will provide laboratory management with the tools to develop procedures for maintenance and verification of incubation units used for microbiological testing that meet the requirements for laboratory accreditation. Applicability: This guidance will apply to all laboratories desiring to obtain and/or maintain accreditation under 25 Pa. Code Chapter 252. Disclaimer: The policies and procedures outlined in this guidance document are intended to supplement existing requirements. Nothing in the policies or procedures will affect regulatory requirements. The policies and procedures herein are not an adjudication or a regulation. There is no intent on the part of the Department to give these rules that weight or deference. This document establishes the framework within which DEP will exercise its administrative discretion in the future. DEP reserves the discretion to deviate from this policy statement if circumstances
    [Show full text]
  • Microlab® STAR™
    Microlab ® STAR™ Microlab ® STAR ™ AUTOMATED WORKFLOW SOLUTIONS CENTERED AROUND YOUR ASSAY The STAR combines Hamilton's patented pipetting technology including precise lock-and-key tip attachment, unrivaled liquid level detection, and comprehensive volume ranges to create flexible liquid handling workstations. Available in three base platform sizes, the STAR portfolio incorporates countless options to automate your workflows. Hamilton Robotics has also partnered with top leaders in the biotechnology industry to provide Standard Solutions based on commonly automated applications. Offering ready-to-start protocols for a variety of applications such as NGS, ELISA, and forensic assays, our Standard Solutions provide a faster way to automate your processes. 2 1 PATENTED TECHNOLOGY The STAR utilizes Hamilton’s proprietary Compressed O-Ring Expansion (CO-RE®) technology. CO-RE minimizes the production of aerosols and allows disposable tips or washable, steel needles to be used on channels in the same run. 2 MULTI-FUNCTIONAL ARM Our technology offers high pipetting accuracy and precision, from sub-microliter to large volumes, using Independent Channels and/or the Multi-Probe Head (MPH). Labware transportation is possible with the iSWAP® or CO-RE Grippers. The STAR can incorporate a camera, tube transportation, and other channel tools on a single arm. Comprehensive pipetting range: ■■■0.5 μL to 1 mL using the 1 mL Independent Channel ■■■50 μL to 5 mL using the 5 mL Independent Channel ■■■1 μL to 1 mL using the CO-RE 96 MPH ■■■0.1 μL to 50 μL using the CO-RE 384 MPH 3 FLEXIBLE SETUP The high-capacity deck is customized specific to your workflow, accommodating a wide range of labware and automated devices that can easily be exchanged to support multiple assays on one platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermo Scientific Solutions Automated Liquid Handling, Detection Model Cat
    THERMO SCIENTIFIC AUTOMATED LIQUID HANDLING, DETECTION AND SAMPLE PURIFICATION SOLUTIONS Versette™ RapidStak™ Also available: 96-and 384-channel Automated Microplate • A complete range of 96- and 384-well solid and strip microplates. Automated Liquid Handler Stacker • A complete line of sample storage tubes and equipment. • Total volume range 0.5-300 µl • Works seamlessly with • A complete range of Thermo Scientific manual and electronic • 96- and 384-channel interchangeable the entire Multidrop line of single and multichannel pipettes and tips. pipetting heads dispensers • Laboratory automation solutions for microplate instrument systems. • Compatible with D.A.R.T.sTM tips with • Schedule and automate any unique sealing properties two instruments with the • 6-position stage with compact dual level Thermo ScientificTM PolaraTM RS deck structure software For additional information contact your ™ • User-friendly programming options • Capacity from 30 to 150 plates Thermo Fisher Scientific sales representative or visit: with onboard touch screen or Thermo • Quick and easy setup www.thermoscientific.com/kingfisherinfo ScientificTM ControlMateTM PC software Model Cat. No. www.thermoscientific.com/versette RapidStak F01350 www.thermoscientific.com/multidrop RapidStak 2x F01351 Model Cat. No. www.thermoscientific.com/platereaders 30-Plate Stak Versette F01436 www.thermoscientific.com/wellwash Reference Guide Versette base unit 650-01-BS 50-Plate Stak F01437 www.thermoscientifc.com/ELISAsolutions 96- and 384-channel pipetting module for use with 650-02-NTC Polara RS Inquire 96- and 384-channel pipetting head 6-position stage 650-03-SPS Versette Pipetting Heads Orbitor RS™ 96-channel air displacement pipetting head. 650-06-9630 Volume 0.5-30 µl Automated Microplate Mover • Dedicated plate mover providing 96-channel air displacement pipetting head.
    [Show full text]
  • Kjeldahl Distillation Unit
    Terms of Business v There are frequent fluctuations in the cost of input. So we may not be able to give prior intimation regarding changes in the price structure. v Packing, Forwarding, Freight and Insurance will be Charged Extra. v Sales Tax and Excise Duty will be extra as per Central or State Government Rules. v Every possible care is taken in packing, but it is difficult to undertake responsibility of loss, breakage or damage during transit. v R/R and our bill be sent though V. P. P. or any scheduled bank. New customers are requested to advance 25% of the estimated value. v While placing the order, please give clear despatch instructions indicating C. S. T. Number, Name of Railway Station, Your Banker and Our Catalogue Number. v All problems shall be solved amicably subject to Ambala Jurisdiction. GUPTA SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES Ambala Cantt. THIS CANCELS OUR ALL PREVIOUS PRICE LISTS PPPrice List 2017-18 CATALOGUE CONTENTS Product Range Pages Interchangeable Standard Joints, Adapters, Stirrers, Condensers, 1 to 49 Laboratory Flasks, Columns, Separating Funnels, Assemblies, Glasswares Water Distillation, Essential Oil, Soxhlet Apparatus. Volumetric Burettes, Pipettes, Micro Pipettes, Measuring Cylinders, 50 to 74 Glasswares Measuring Flasks, Culture Tubes, Centrifuge Tube & Test Tubes. Sintered Sintered Crucibles, Funnels, Chromatography Columns and 75 to 84 Glasswares Filter Assembly. Gas Estimation Impinger, Gas Burettes, Tubes, Gas Wash Bottles, 85 to 90 Apparatus Oxygen Purity and Orsat Apparatus. Special Semi Micro Ware, Clinical Laboratory Apparatus, 91 to 97 Glasswares Electrodes and Milk Testing Apparatus. Supplementary Stopcocks, Rotaflow Screw Type Stopcocks, Teflon Key 98 to 123 Glasswares Stopcocks, Manometers, Weighing Bottles, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight New Filter Bags from Whirl-Pak® Three New Hydrated Sponge
    NEW PRODUCTS Eight new filter bags from whirl-pak® Specially designed for use with homogenizer blenders. Extra-heavy PET film and special features for easier and more efficient testing. Additional sizes and styles on page 11. Vertical Filter Bags Bags use a special laminated PET film for durability and a vertical nonwoven filter to separate solids for easy pipetting of the liquid sample. Available with or without a closure, each bag contains a 250 micron polyester filter adhered vertically along the side of the 3 mil (0.76 mm) bag. Easy-pour side seal allows you to simply pour liquid out of the bag without also emptying solids. Hydrated PolySponge™ Bags B01586 — 55 oz. With Closure three new Hydrated sponge products from whirl-pak® Make environmental surface sampling faster and easier with these pre-moistened bags. Durable high-density polyurethane sponge is ready to use and resists tearing and fraying. Each is hydrated with HiCap™ Neutralizing Broth. Additional information on page 12. Hydrated PolyProbe™ HiCap™ is a registered trademark of World Bioproducts, LLC. ctured under a ufa qua n li Whirl-Pak® Bags are manufactured under a quality management system certified to ISO9001, except B01299, B01350, a t y M m o , , , , , , , and which require an additional processing step an t B01392 B01422 B01423 B01475 B01478 B01590 B01591 B01592 age fied ISO9001ment system certi done outside of regular production. • Standard Methods Says — Standard Methods (18th edition, 1992, section 9060A, sample containers) states “For some applications, samples may be collected in pre-sterilized plastic bags.” Whirl-Pak® bags meet this description.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Laboratory Testing of Fishery Products
    ISSN: 1995-4875 CRFM Special Publication. No.14 Manual on Laboratory Testing of Fishery Products The SPS Project is funded by the European Union under the 10th Economic Development Fund and is being implemented by the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA) with the following regional Partners: the CARICOM Secretariat, the Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism (CRFM), El Comité Nacional para la Aplicació n de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias de la Repú blica Dominicana (CNMSF) and CARIFORUM. Manual on Laboratory Testing of Fisheries Products Copyright © 2016 by Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism (CRFM) All rights reserved. Reproduction, dissemination and use of material in this publication for educational or non- commercial purposes are authorized without prior written permission of the CRFM, provided the source is fully acknowledged. No part of this publication may be reproduced, disseminated or used for any commercial purposes or resold without the prior written permission of the CRFM. Prepared by: Christine Froese, Megapesca Lda., December 2016, under contract to the Inter- American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), through the 10th EDF funded Sanitary and Phytosanitary Project Correct Citation: Froese, C, 2016. Manual on Laboratory Testing of Fishery Products. CRFM Special Publication. No.14. 89pp. ISSN: 1995-4875 ISBN: 978-976-8257-38-3 Cover Photo: Fishery Product Testing Laboratory, Saint Vincent Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Equipments in the Department (Chemical Engineering) Mechanical
    List of Equipments in the Department (Chemical Engineering) Mechanical Operation lab Fluid Mechanics Lab Heat transfer Lab Mass Transfer lab • Cyclone Separator • Reynold’s Apparatus • Double Pipe Heat Exchanger • Tray Dryer • Plate & Frame Filter Press • Bernoulli’s Theorem Apparatus • Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger • Sieve Plate Distillation Column • Vibrating Screen • Pitot Tube Apparatus • Vertical Condenser • Liquid-Liquid Extraction • Jaw Crusher • Calibration of Orifice meter, • Computerized Control Shell & • Adsorption of CO 2 • Ball Mill Venturi meter and Rota meter Tube Heat Exchanger • Steam Distillation • Roll Crusher • Coefficient of Discharge of • Thermal Conductivity of Metal • Bubble Cap Distillation Column • Rotary Vacuum filter Orifice and Mouthpiece Bar • Cooling Tower • Fluidized Bed • Film & Drop Wise Condensation • Diffusivity Apparatus • Single Effect Evaporator • Fluidized Bed Dryer • Simple Steam Distillation • Simple Distillation • VLE Apparatus • Equilibrium Flash Distillation • Humidification & Dehumidification • Refractometer Process Control Lab Chemical Reaction Engg. Lab Fuel Combustion Energy Technology Lab Environmental Lab • Process Training Simulator with • Plug Flow Reactor • Flash & Fire Point Apparatus • BOD Incubator Modules (Software) • Isothermal Batch Reactor • Aniline Point Apparatus • pH Meter • Pressure Control System • Single Tube Packed Bed Reactor • Orsat Gas Analysis Apparatus • Sedimentation Apparatus • Flow Control System • RTD in CSTR / Mixed flow • Redwood Viscometer • UV-VIS Spectrophotometer • pH control System Reactor • Bomb Calorimeter • DO Meter • Real Time Simulator Trainer • RTD in Tubular Reactor • Smoke Point Apparatus • Digital Conductivity Meter • Level Control System • Adiabatic Batch Reactor • Temperature Control System • Distillation Column • Two Tank Interacting system • Two Tank Non-Interacting System • CSTR Control System Research Equipments • UV-Spectrophotometer • Gas Chomatography .
    [Show full text]