Assessment Form
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Local Government Performance Assessment Wakiso District (Vote Code: 555) Assessment Scores Accountability Requirements % Crosscutting Performance Measures 84% Educational Performance Measures 89% Health Performance Measures 85% Water & Environment Performance Measures 81% 555 Accountability Requirements 2019 Wakiso District No. Summary of requirements Definition of compliance Compliance justification Compliant? Annual performance contract 1 Yes LG has submitted an annual performance • From MoFPED’s Wakiso Local Government contract of the forthcoming year by June 30 inventory/schedule of LG submitted the annual on the basis of the PFMAA and LG Budget submissions of performance performance contract on guidelines for the coming financial year. contracts, check dates of 22nd July 2019. This is submission and issuance of within the adjusted deadline receipts and: of 31st August 2019. Therefore, the LG is o If LG submitted before or compliant. by due date, then state ‘compliant’ o If LG had not submitted or submitted later than the due date, state ‘non- compliant’ • From the Uganda budget website: www.budget.go.ug, check and compare recorded date therein with date of LG submission to confirm. Supporting Documents for the Budget required as per the PFMA are submitted and available 2 Yes LG has submitted a Budget that includes a • From MoFPED’s The Local Government Procurement Plan for the forthcoming FY by inventory of LG budget submitted the budget 30th June (LG PPDA Regulations, 2006). submissions, check together with the whether: Procurement Plan on 22nd July 2019. This is within the o The LG budget is adjusted deadline of 31st accompanied by a August 2019. Therefore, the Procurement Plan or not. If a LG is Compliant. LG submission includes a Procurement Plan, the LG is compliant; otherwise it is not compliant. Reporting: submission of annual and quarterly budget performance reports 3 Yes LG has submitted the annual performance From MoFPED’s official The annual performance report for the previous FY on or before 31st record/inventory of LG report for the previous year July (as per LG Budget Preparation submission of annual was submitted on 09th Guidelines for coming FY; PFMA Act, 2015) performance report August 2019. This is within submitted to MoFPED, the adjusted deadline of check the date MoFPED 31st August 2019. received the annual Therefore, the LG is performance report: Compliant. • If LG submitted report to MoFPED in time, then it is compliant • If LG submitted late or did not submit, then it is not compliant 4 Yes LG has submitted the quarterly budget From MoFPED’s official The Local Government performance report for all the four quarters of record/ inventory of LG submitted quarterly and the previous FY by end of the FY; PFMA submission of quarterly annual reports as follows: Act, 2015). reports submitted to MoFPED, check the date Quarter 1 on 31st October, MoFPED received the 2018; quarterly performance Quarter 2 on 23rd January, reports: 2019; • If LG submitted all four Quarter 3 on 21st May 2019 reports to MoFPED of the and previous FY by July 31, then it is compliant (timely Quarter 4 on 9th August submission of each 2019. quarterly report, is not an accountability requirement, The LG submitted the 4th but by end of the FY, all quarterly report (annual quarterly reports should be performance report) on 9th available). August 2019. This is within the adjusted deadline of • If LG submitted late or did 31st August 2019. not submit at all, then it is Therefore, the LG is not compliant. Compliant. Audit 5 Yes The LG has provided information to the From MoFPED’s The LG submitted status of PS/ST on the status of implementation of Inventory/record of LG implementation of Auditor Internal Auditor General and the Auditor submissions of statements General audit issues for the General’s findings for the previous financial entitled “Actions to Address year 2017/18 on 11 March year by end of February (PFMA s. 11 2g). Internal Auditor General’s 2019 to PS/ST, ref CR This statement includes actions against all findings”, 251/2, letter signed by Chief find- ings where the Internal Audi- tor and Administration Officer the Auditor General recommended the Check: (CAO) dated 7 March, 2019 Accounting Officer to take action in lines addressed all the 5 audit • If LG submitted a with applicable laws. issues. ‘Response’ (and provide details), then it is compliant The LG also submitted the status of implementation on • If LG did not submit a’ Internal Audit Issues for the response’, then it is non- year 2017/18 to PS/ST on compliant 28 January, ref CRD 251/2 • If there is a response for letter signed by the CAO all –LG is compliant dated 7 January 2019. • If there are partial or not Both audit responses were all issues responded to – LG submitted before the is not compliant. deadline of April 30, 2019, hence the LG was compliant. 6 Yes The audit opinion of LG Financial Statement From the Auditor General's (issued in January) is not adverse or report for the FY 2018/19, disclaimer. the LG had an unqualified audit opinion. 555 Crosscutting Wakiso Performance District Measures 2019 Summary of Definition of No. Compliance justification Score requirements compliance Planning, budgeting and execution 1 1 All new Evidence that a district/ There was evidence that the Physical planning committee is fully infrastructure municipality has: constituted as per the Physical Planning Act 2010. This was projects in: (i) a confirmed by the appointment letters dated 13th April 2018 under municipality / • A functional Physical reference CR:202/2. (ii) in a district Planning Committee in are approved place that considers new Additionally, the Committee is functional and considers new by the investments on time: investments on time. The evidence availed was the PPC minutes respective score 1. dated 12th June 2019 under Min.DPPC.13/104/19: Presentation of Physical the final draft physical development plan of Mende subcounty. The Planning draft PDP was presented by Mr. Kenneth Ahimbisibwe, a Committees Consultant from Stanfield Ltd. Also, under Min. DPPC.13/105/19: and are Presentation of Lubigi -Sentema wetland 3D urban model by Ms. consistent with Prisca Auma of M/S White Knight Ltd and Min. DPPC.13/107/19: the approved Consideration of development applications for the months of April Physical Plans – May 2019. A schedule of 47 building plans was presented and subsequently approved. Maximum 4 points for this performance measure. 1 1 All new • Evidence that district/ There was evidence that the district LG submitted at least 4 sets of infrastructure MLG has submitted at minutes of Physical Planning Committee to the MoLHUD. The projects in: (i) a least 4 sets of minutes of evidence availed was copies of minutes dated 12th June 2019 municipality / Physical Planning (Quarter 4); 28th March 2019 (Quarter 3); 10th October 2018 (ii) in a district Committee to the (Quarter 2); and 01st August 2018 (Quarter 1). Minutes of meetings are approved MoLHUD score 1. that took place in Quarter 4 were received by MoLHUD on by the 23/10/2019, while the other three (3) sets of minutes were received respective on 31/07/2019, respectively. Physical Planning The submission letters dated 8th July 2019 and 20th September Committees 2019 under reference: CR.2/202 were also availed. and are consistent with the approved Physical Plans Maximum 4 points for this performance measure. 1 1 All new • All infrastructure There was evidence that the LG has an approved Physical infrastructure investments are Development Plan 2018-2040 prepared by Gipea Africa Limited projects in: (i) a consistent with the and approved by the National Physical Planning Board. There municipality / approved Physical was evidence that infrastructure projects were consistent with the (ii) in a district Development Plan: new plan. are approved score 1 or else 0 by the respective Physical Planning Committees and are consistent with the approved Physical Plans Maximum 4 points for this performance measure. 1 1 All new • Action area plan There was evidence that Wakiso district had an Action area plan infrastructure prepared for the previous prepared for Mende Sub county (2019-2035) by Stanfield Property projects in: (i) a FY: score 1 or else 0 Partners Limited. The Plan was approved under Min.13/104/19. municipality / Additionally, the District LG has prepared an Action Plan (Detailed (ii) in a district Plan) for Bulenga Urban Center in Wakiso Sub County dated June are approved 2019. by the respective Physical Planning Committees and are consistent with the approved Physical Plans Maximum 4 points for this performance measure. 2 2 The prioritized • Evidence that priorities There was evidence that the priorities in the AWP for the current investment in AWP for the current FY are based on outcomes of the budget conferences. The activities in the FY are based on the priorities include: approved AWP outcomes of budget for the current conferences: score 2. - Works: Buildings – Furnishing of Council chambers (Pg.20 of FY are derived Annual Work Plan and pg. 2 of Budget Conference Report); from the - Works: Buildings – Paving of parking yard at the district approved five- headquarters (Pg.20 of Annual Work Plan and pg. 2 of Budget year Conference Report); development - Works: Repair and application of asphalt overlay on Wakiso plan, are based district headquarters main road in partnership with Wakiso town on discussions council – Furnishing of Council chambers (Pg.20 of Annual Work in annual Plan and pg. 2 of Budget Conference Report); reviews and - Water: Drilling of deep boreholes (motorized) in Kakiri subcounty budget and Nsangi town council (Pg.22 of Annual Work Plan and pg. 3 of conferences Budget Conference Report); and - Water: Borehole drilling and hand pump installation (Pg.22 of have project Annual Work Plan and pg.