DOCSLIB.ORG

Guatemala: Squeezed Between Crime and Impunity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guatemala: Squeezed Between Crime and Impunity GUATEMALA: SQUEEZED BETWEEN CRIME AND IMPUNITY Latin America Report N°33 – 22 June 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. ROOTS OF PROTRACTED CONFLICT AND PERVASIVE VIOLENCE ............. 2 A. CIVIL WAR .................................................................................................................................. 3 B. LEGACY OF THE CONFLICT ........................................................................................................... 4 C. PEACE AND DISILLUSION ............................................................................................................. 4 D. MONUMENTAL CHALLENGES ....................................................................................................... 6 III. CRIME AND THE STATE .............................................................................................. 8 A. THE ARMED FORCES .................................................................................................................... 8 B. FAILURE OF POLICE REFORM ....................................................................................................... 9 C. GANGS ....................................................................................................................................... 12 D. DRUG TRAFFICKING AND INSTABILITY ....................................................................................... 14 IV. EFFORTS TO REVERSE THE SLIDE ....................................................................... 17 A. GUATEMALAN GOVERNMENT .................................................................................................... 17 B. U.S. GOVERNMENT .................................................................................................................... 18 C. CANADA AND EUROPE ............................................................................................................... 19 D. THE CICIG ................................................................................................................................ 19 V. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 22 APPENDICES A. MAP OF GUATEMALA ...................................................................................................................... 23 B. ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP .................................................................................... 24 C. CRISIS GROUP REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS ON LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN SINCE 2007 ..... 25 D. CRISIS GROUP BOARD OF TRUSTEES ................................................................................................ 26 Latin America Report N°33 22 June 2010 GUATEMALA: SQUEEZED BETWEEN CRIME AND IMPUNITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 1996 peace accords formally ended Guatemala’s civil corrupt police. High-profile assassinations and the gov- war but failure to address the conflict’s root causes and ernment’s inability to reduce murders have produced dismantle clandestine security apparatuses has weakened paralysing fear, a sense of helplessness and frustration. its institutions and opened the door to skyrocketing vio- In the past few years, the security environment has dete- lent crime. Guatemala is one of the world’s most danger- riorated further, and the population has turned to vigilan- ous countries, with some 6,500 murders in 2009, more tism as a brutal and extra-institutional way of combating than the average yearly killings during the civil war and crime. roughly twice Mexico’s homicide rate. Under heavy pres- sure at home, Mexican drug traffickers have moved into President Colom took office in 2008 with the promise, Guatemala to compete for control of Andean cocaine like his predecessors, at least to slow the spiral of vio- transiting to the U.S. The UN-sanctioned International lence and to end impunity. However, his administration Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) has has been plagued by instability, corruption and a lack of brought hope by making some progress at getting a han- capacity. There have been five interior ministers, two of dle on high-level corruption. However, in June 2010 its whom are facing corruption charges, while two police Spanish director, Carlos Castresana, resigned saying the chiefs have been arrested for connections to drug traffick- government had not kept its promise to support CICIG’s ing. The president himself was nearly toppled, when a work and reform the justice system. President Álvaro prominent lawyer and businessman were assassinated un- Colom needs to consolidate recent gains with institutional der bizarre circumstances in 2009. Nevertheless, some reform, anti-corruption measures, vetting mechanisms and progress has been made with international assistance, in a more inclusive political approach, including to indige- particular from the CICIG. To achieve lasting results, nous peoples. however, Guatemalans and their international counter- parts need to act in the following areas: The administration of President Álvaro Arzú and the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unity (URNG) guer- The government of Guatemala should give priority to rilla group signed peace accords fourteen years ago that reforming the police and military as well as the cor- promised a massive overhaul of the military and of a rections and justice systems; ensuring the vetting of system that marginalised the majority of citizens, among and financial disclosure by high-level government and them large sectors of the indigenous population, and state officials, so as to combat corruption; stimulating served the interests of the small economic and political the full political and economic participation of indige- elite. However, there has been little follow-through. Tax nous leaders and communities; and improving the collection is still the lowest in Latin America (some 10 legislature’s professional capacity in the area of jus- per cent of gross domestic product, GDP), in flagrant vio- tice reform and law enforcement. lation of a key provision of the peace accords. In addition Central American governments, as well as Panama and to the rise of clandestine groups, many directed by ex- Mexico, together with the Andean region, should con- senior military officers and politicians, the country has tinue to advance cooperation and information-sharing seen the proliferation of Mexican drug-trafficking organi- initiatives, in order to better combat crime, gangs and sations (DTOs) and youth gangs (maras). Criminal organi- drug trafficking. sations traffic in everything from illegal drugs to adopted babies, and street gangs extort and terrorise entire neigh- UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon should quickly bourhoods, often with the complicity of authorities. appoint a new CICIG director, and the international community should extend CICIG’s mandate beyond Guatemala has become a paradise for criminals, who have September 2011; expand it to specifically address crime little to fear from prosecutors owing to high levels of and corruption; and increase political and financial impunity. An overhaul of the security forces in the wake support. At the same time, the international commu- of the peace accords created an ineffective and deeply Guatemala: Squeezed Between Crime and Impunity Crisis Group Latin America Report N°33, 22 June 2010 Page ii nity should increase support for institutional reform and capacity building, so that Guatemala can eventu- ally take over CICIG’s functions effectively. The U.S., within the Mérida Initiative framework, should increase funding and make its support to Cen- tral America, especially Guatemala, more effective. Bogotá/Brussels, 22 June 2010 Latin America Report N°33 22 June 2010 GUATEMALA: SQUEEZED BETWEEN CRIME AND IMPUNITY I. INTRODUCTION In recent years, Guatemala has been crippled by soaring tion campaign against him, Castresana resigned on 7 June levels of violent crime and impunity, which threaten the 2010, four days before the Constitutional Court annulled security of its population and seriously undermine the Reyes’s selection on procedural grounds. His unexpected country’s institutions and state authority. Citizens from departure has cast a large shadow over the future of all walks of life increasingly face the threat of murder, CICIG (whose mandate is scheduled to expire in Septem- kidnapping, extortion, gang violence and shootouts be- ber 2011) and the international community’s attempt to tween rival drug trafficking organisations (DTOs), both help salvage Guatemala’s justice system. Guatemalan and Mexican. Higher levels of violence than during the 36-year armed conflict, which in 1996 was This report is the first in a new Crisis Group series that ended through a peace agreement, have produced a per- will examine different aspects of the effort to recover the vasive sense of insecurity and hopelessness. rule of law in Guatemala. While an outright return of civil war is not expected, the government of President Álvaro Colom (2008-2012) has been unable to reduce violent crime. In the vast majority of cases, perpetrators are never arrested, let alone charged. Extreme levels of impunity have emboldened criminal groups to employ increasingly violent tactics. The wide- spread perception of a lack of government capacity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Guatemala Genocide Cases: Universal Jurisdiction and Its Limits
    © The Guatemala Genocide Cases: Universal Jurisdiction and Its Limits by Paul “Woody” Scott* INTRODUCTION Systematic murder, genocide, torture, terror and cruelty – all are words used to describe the campaigns of Guatemalan leaders, including President Jose Efrain Rios Montt, directed toward the indigenous Mayans in the Guatemalan campo. The United Nations-backed Truth Commission concludes that the state carried out deliberate acts of genocide against the Mayan indigenous populations.1 Since Julio Cesar Mendez Montenegro took Guatemalan presidential office in 1966, Guatemala was involved in a bloody civil war between the army and guerrilla groups located in the Guatemalan countryside. The bloodshed escalated as Montt, a fundamentalist Christian minister, rose to power in 1982 after taking part in a coup d’état and becoming the de facto president of Guatemala. He was in power for just sixteen months, considered by many to be the bloodiest period of Guatemala’s history.2 Under his sixteen-month rule, more than 200,000 people were victims of homicide or forced kidnappings, 83% of whom were of indigenous Mayan origin. Indigenous Mayans were targeted, killed, tortured, raped, and * Paul “Woody” Scott is an associate attorney with Jeri Flynn & Associates in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. His practice is primarily immigration law and criminal defense, specializing in defending immigrants charged with criminal offenses, and deportation defense. He was born in San Pedro Sula, Honduras and moved to the United States at a very early age. He is fluent in both English and Spanish. 1 United Nations Office for Project Services [UNOPS], Commission for Historical Clarification [CEH], Conclusions and Recommendations, GUATEMALA, MEMORIA DEL SILENCIO [hereinafter, GUATEMALA, MEMORY OF SILENCE], Volume V, ¶ 26 (1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Memory Symposium | June 2-5, 2019 Gettysburg College
    ! Historical Memory Symposium | June 2-5, 2019 Gettysburg College | Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, USA Sunday, June 2nd 6 pm Welcome dinner at the Gettysburg Hotel Monday, June 3rd 9 am Opening Remarks & Introductions | All seminars held in Science Center 200 9:30-10:30 am Monumental Commemorations Julian Bonder, architect; Roger Williams College Exploring the role of monuments, parks and museums in preserving and celebrating historic events and in shaping collective memory 11 am-3 pm Guided Visit to Gettysburg Battlefield Led by Peter Carmichael and Jill Titus, Civil War Institute at Gettysburg College 3 pm-5:30 pm Gettysburg Museum and Visitors’ Center Tuesday, June 4th 9-10:15 am Memory vis-à-vis Recent Events in the United States and Central America Stephen Kinzer, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University Location: Science Center 200 10:30-11:45 am Historical Memory Research I: SPAIN Brief presentations by faculty and students about their research focused on historical and collective memory, with a focus on methodologies. Juanjo Romero, Resident Director, CASA Barcelona Ava Rosenberg, Returning student, CASA Spain Maria Luisa Guardiola, Professor, Swarthmore 12-1 pm Lunch 1:15-2:15 pm Historical Memory Research II: CUBA Brief presentations by faculty and students about their research focused on historical and collective memory, with a focus on methodologies. Somi Jun, Returning student, CASA Cuba Rainer Schultz, Resident Director, CASA Cuba 2:30-4 pm De-Brief and Sharing Project Ideas 5:30-7:30 pm Dinner and closing remarks | Atrium Dining Hall Speaker Bios Julian Bonder Professor of Architecture, Roger Williams University Julian Bonder is a teacher, designer and architect born in New York and raised in Argentina.
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Hope U.S
    Killing Hope U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II – Part I William Blum Zed Books London Killing Hope was first published outside of North America by Zed Books Ltd, 7 Cynthia Street, London NI 9JF, UK in 2003. Second impression, 2004 Printed by Gopsons Papers Limited, Noida, India w w w.zedbooks .demon .co .uk Published in South Africa by Spearhead, a division of New Africa Books, PO Box 23408, Claremont 7735 This is a wholly revised, extended and updated edition of a book originally published under the title The CIA: A Forgotten History (Zed Books, 1986) Copyright © William Blum 2003 The right of William Blum to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Cover design by Andrew Corbett ISBN 1 84277 368 2 hb ISBN 1 84277 369 0 pb Spearhead ISBN 0 86486 560 0 pb 2 Contents PART I Introduction 6 1. China 1945 to 1960s: Was Mao Tse-tung just paranoid? 20 2. Italy 1947-1948: Free elections, Hollywood style 27 3. Greece 1947 to early 1950s: From cradle of democracy to client state 33 4. The Philippines 1940s and 1950s: America's oldest colony 38 5. Korea 1945-1953: Was it all that it appeared to be? 44 6. Albania 1949-1953: The proper English spy 54 7. Eastern Europe 1948-1956: Operation Splinter Factor 56 8. Germany 1950s: Everything from juvenile delinquency to terrorism 60 9. Iran 1953: Making it safe for the King of Kings 63 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Army for Progress: the U.S. Militarization of the Guatemalan
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 1995 ARMY FOR PROGRESS : THE U.S. MILITARIZATION OF THE GUATEMALAN POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CRISIS 1961-1969 Michael Donoghue University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Donoghue, Michael, "ARMY FOR PROGRESS : THE U.S. MILITARIZATION OF THE GUATEMALAN POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CRISIS 1961-1969" (1995). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 1808. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/1808 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARMY FOR PROGRESS : THE U.S. MILITARIZATION OF THE GUATEMALAN POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CRISIS 1961-1969 BY MICHAELE.DONOGHUE A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND - ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to explore the military and political implications of the United States' foreign policy towards Guatemala in the years 1961 to 1969. Guatemala was a key battleground of the Cold War in Latin America in the crucial decade of the 1960s. While greater scholarly attention has focused on the 1954 U.S. backed CIA planned cou~ in Guatemala, the events of the 1960s proved an equally significant watershed in U.S.-Latin American relations. Tue outbreak of a nationalist insurgency in Guatemala early in the decade provided the Kennedy Administration with a vital testing ground for its new counter-insurgency and civic action politico-military doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Analysis and Decision-Making Behind the Overthrow of Guatemalan Democracy
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2017 In Darker Shadows: Intelligence Analysis and Decision-Making behind the Overthrow of Guatemalan Democracy William R. Weber Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weber, William R., "In Darker Shadows: Intelligence Analysis and Decision-Making behind the Overthrow of Guatemalan Democracy" (2017). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 6928. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6928 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In Darker Shadows: Intelligence Analysis and Decision-making Behind the Overthrow of Guatemalan Democracy William R. Weber Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History James F. Siekmeier, Ph.D., Chair Michelle M. Stephens, Ph.D. David M. Hauser, Ph.D. Department of History Morgantown, West Virginia 2017 Keywords: CIA; Guatemala; Analyst; Intelligence Community; Cold War; Eisenhower; Árbenz; Covert Action, Decision-making Copyright 2017 William R.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Evaluation: Guatemala Country Report
    Impact Evaluation: Guatemala Country Report By Susan Berk-Seligson, Ph.D. Diana Orcés, Ph.D. Georgina Pizzolitto, M.A. Mitchell A. Seligson, Ph.D. Carole Wilson, Ph.D. The Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) Vanderbilt University This study was performed with support from the Program in Democracy and Governance of the United States Agency for International Development. The opinions expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the point of view of the United States Agency for International Development. Revised December 2014 Impact Evaluation Guatemala ‐ Report Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 I. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 II. Main Findings ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 III. Policy Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Some Realism About Unilateralism
    Nova Law Review Volume 28, Issue 3 2004 Article 9 Some Realism About Unilateralism Anthony Chase∗ ∗ Copyright c 2004 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Chase: Some Realism About Unilateralism SOME REALISM ABOUT UNILATERALISM ANTHONY CHASE* "The fresh look is always the fresh hope." -Karl Llewellyn' THE GREAT FEAR A specter is haunting international politics-the specter of American unilateralism.2 Robert Rubin, the highly regarded former United States ("U.S.") Secretary of the Treasury, told National Public Radio's Diane Rehm that he hoped 2004 would bring a national debate over the country's "rela- tively unilateralist policy," an approach to "how we deal with the rest of the world" that is "not going to work but also creates an enormous antagonism against the United States."3 At one level, anxiety about American unilateral- ism simply expresses a desire that U.S. foreign policy, and the way it is ap- plied, should be popular with as many nations as possible. And it would be nice if some of those nations could more enthusiastically support American policy, whether diplomatically, financially, or militarily. At another level, the unilateralist critique covers concerns about an American embrace of the doctrine of preemption or preventative wars 4 as * Professor of Law, Shepard Broad Law Center, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 1. KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS 510 (1960). 2. See generally NOAM CHOMSKY, HEGEMONY OR SURVIVAL: AMERICA'S QUEST FOR GLOBAL DOMINANCE (2003); SAUL LANDAU, THE PRE-EMPTIVE EMPIRE: A GUIDE TO BUSH'S KINGDOM (2003); CLYDE PRESTOWITZ, ROGUE NATION: AMERICAN UNILATERALISM AND THE FAILURE OF GOOD INTENTIONS (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Ghosts of Guatemala's Past
    Ghosts of Guatemala’s Past By STEPHEN SCHLESINGER | JUNE 3, 2011 In 1954, the American government committed one of the most reprehensible acts in its history when it authorized the C.I.A. to overthrow the democratically elected leader of Guatemala, President Jacobo Arbenz. It did so secretly but later rationalized the coup on the ground that the country was about to fall into communist hands. Guatemalan society has only recently recovered from the suffering that this intervention caused, including brutal military dictatorships and a genocidal civil war against its Indian population, which led to the deaths of an estimated 200,000 people. Only in the 1980s, when a peace process commenced, did democratic governance resume. But a silence about the Arbenz era continued. Now, after 25 years of increasingly vibrant democratic rule, Guatemalans feel confident enough to honor the memory of their deposed leader by incorporating his achievements into the national school curriculum, naming a highway after him, and preparing an official biography. America should follow suit by owning up to its own ignoble deed and recognizing Arbenz as the genuine social progressive that he was. Washington feared Arbenz because he tried to institute agrarian reforms that would hand over fallow land to dispossessed peasants, thereby creating a middle class in a country where 2 percent of the population owned 72 percent of the land. Unfortunately for him, most of that territory belonged to the largest landowner and most powerful body in the state: the American-owned United Fruit Company. Though Arbenz was willing to compensate United Fruit for its losses, it tried to persuade Washington that Arbenz was a crypto-communist who must be ousted.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlos Castillo Armas, the United States and the 1954 Counterrevolution in Guatemala
    CARLOS CASTILLO ARMAS, THE UNITED STATES AND THE 1954 COUNTERREVOLUTION IN GUATEMALA Andres Alberto Tapia B.A., University of California, Davis, 2009 THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO FALL 2011 CARLOS CASTILLO ARMAS, THE UNITED STATES AND THE 1954 COUNTERREVOLUTION IN GUATEMALA A Thesis by Andres Alberto Tapia Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Joseph Palermo __________________________________, Second Reader Patrick Ettinger ____________________________ Date ii Student: Andres Alberto Tapia I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Mona Siegel Date Department of History iii Abstract of CARLOS CASTILLO ARMAS, THE UNITED STATES AND THE 1954 COUNTERREVOLUTION IN GUATEMALA by Andres Alberto Tapia Statement of Problem The 1954 overthrow of President Jacobo Arbenz Gúzman orchestrated by the United States has been approached by various points of view by different historians. While many aspects of the overthrow such as the involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency, the influence of the United Fruit Company, and the Guatemalan government’s relation to communism have all been covered, one crucial player in the overthrow, Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas, has not gained the same critical attention. Castillo Armas acted as the counterrevolutionary the CIA chose to lead the overthrow of Arbenz therefore understanding how he received the role and how he performed his task is important to understanding this historical moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Organized Crime in Central America and the Caribbean a Threat Assessment Executive Summary
    Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: +(43) (1) 26060-0, Fax: +(43) (1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org TRANSNatioNAL ORGANIZED CRIME IN CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN A Threat Assessment Executive summary United Nations publication printed in Mexico September 2012 September 2012 Copyright © 2012, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copy- right holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. Acknowledgements This study was conducted under the responsibility of the UNODC Offices in Mexico (ROMEX) and Panama (ROPAN), Division for Operations (DO), with research support of the UNODC Studies and Threat Analysis Section (STAS), Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs (DPA). Research Claudio Damián Rodríguez Santorum, Enrique Marín Pellecer, Felipe de la Torre, Jenna Dawson, Jorge Manuel Vargas Mediavilla, Juliana Erthal Rodrigues Dos Santos, Louise Bosetti, Bertha Nayelly Loya Marin, Simone Lucatello (consultant) and Ted Leggett (lead researcher). Translation, graphic design, mapping support, desktop publishing and printing Anja Korenblik, Deniz Mermerci, Jorge Manuel Vargas Mediavilla, Kristina Kuttnig and Suzanne Kunnen. Supervision Aldo Lale-Demoz (Director, DO) Amado Philip de Andrés (Representative, ROPAN) Antonio Mazzitelli (Representative, ROMEX) Thibault Le Pichon (Chief, STAS) The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the data and information reported by governments to UNODC and other international organizations. UNODC is particularly thankful to government and law enforcement officials met in the region while undertaking research.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Intelligence That Overthrew a Guatemalan Government, 1952-1954 Sean Thearle
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 2012 "Freedom of Speech and Religion?": Psychological Intelligence that Overthrew a Guatemalan Government, 1952-1954 Sean Thearle Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Thearle, S. (2012). "Freedom of Speech and Religion?": Psychological Intelligence that Overthrew a Guatemalan Government, 1952-1954 (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1274 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RELIGION?”: PSYCHOLOGICAL INTELLIGENCE THAT OVERTHREW A GUATEMALAN GOVERNMENT, 1952-1954 A Master‟s Thesis Submitted to the McAnulty Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts By Sean F. Thearle May 2012 Copyright by Sean F. Thearle 2012 “FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RELIGION?”: PSYCHOLOGICAL INTELLIGENCE THAT OVERTHREW A GUATEMALAN GOVERNMENT, 1952-1954 By Sean F. Thearle Approved March 27, 2012 _______________________________ John J. Dwyer, PhD. Associate Professor, Department of History Advisor, Committee Chair _______________________________ Joseph Rishel PhD. Professor, Department of History Reader, Committee Member _______________________________ Holly A. Mayer, PhD. Associate Professor & Chair, Department of History _______________________________ James C. Swindal, PhD. Acting Dean McAnulty Graduate School of Liberal Arts iii ABSTRACT “FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RELIGION?”: PSYCHOLOGICAL INTELLIGENCE THAT OVERTHREW A GUATEMALAN GOVERNMENT, 1952-1954 By Sean F. Thearle March 2012 Thesis Supervised by Professor John J.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-UN RELATIONS (With Policy Recommendations)
    U.S.-UN RELATIONS (with Policy Recommendations) JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR. JOHN R. BOLTON LAWRENCE S. FINKELSTEIN SHEPARD FORMAN FEREYDOUN HOVEYDA WILLIAM VANDEN HEUVEL EDWARD C. LUCK WILLIAM H. LUERS BENJAMIN RIVLIN STEPHEN SCHLESINGER NANCY SODERBERG THOMAS G. WEISS Foreword by DONALD BLINKEN AND GEORGE D. SCHWAB NEW YORK, AUGUST 2006 Our Mission The National Committee on American Foreign Policy was founded in 1974 by Professor Hans J. Morgenthau and others. It is a nonprofit activist organization dedicated to the resolution of conflicts that threaten U.S. interests. Toward that end, the National Committee identifies, articulates, and helps advance American foreign policy interests from a nonpartisan perspective within the framework of political realism. American foreign policy interests include preserving and strengthening national security; supporting countries committed to the values and the practice of political, religious, and cultural pluralism; improving U.S. relations with the developed and developing worlds; advancing human rights; encouraging realistic arms-control agreements; curbing the proliferation of nuclear and other unconventional weapons; promoting an open and global economy. Believing that an informed public is vital to a democratic society, the National Committee offers educational programs that address security challenges facing the United States and publishes a variety of publications, including its bimonthly journal, American Foreign Policy Interests, that present keen analyses of all aspects of American foreign policy. Q Contents Acknowledgment . 2 by George D. Schwab Foreword . 3 by Donald Blinken and George D. Schwab Introduction: How Does the UN System Fit into American Foreign Policy Interests? . 5 by Benjamin Rivlin No More Business as Usual . 7 by John R.
    [Show full text]