DOCSLIB.ORG

Guatemala Background Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guatemala Background Paper AMERICAS COUNTRY OF ORIGIN SERIES GUATEMALA BACKGROUND PAPER October 2013 Paula Worby Visiting Scholar, Center for Latin American Studies University of California, Berkeley Regional Bureau for the Americas United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees P.O. Box 2500, 1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.unhcr.org RBA/COI/GUA/13/01 The present paper has been prepared by Paula Worby, Visiting Scholar at the Center for Latin American Studies of the University of California, Berkeley. Ms. Worby holds a doctorate in Public Health from the University of California, Berkeley, has conducted research in Guatemala beginning in 1985, and is the author of various related articles and monographs. She worked for UNHCR Guatemala from 1992 to 1998 and currently is Associate Director of a non-profit organization providing social services to immigrant families in California. The author would like to thank Luis Solano for extensive background research for this project and the Center for Latin American Studies (CLAS) at University of California, Berkeley, especially for access to research resources and for administrative support. The document was prepared on the basis of publicly available information and analysis. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the United Nations or the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. This paper may be freely quoted, cited and copied for academic, educational or other non-commercial purposes without prior permission from UNHCR, provided that the source and author are acknowledged. This paper is not, and does not purport to be fully exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. The paper is available online at: www.refworld.org © United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 2013. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 RECENT POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS ................................................................................................. 5 2.2 REGIONAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 16 2.3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................................ 19 3. PREVAILING SECURITY CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 24 3.1 VIOLENCE LINKED TO ORGANIZED CRIME, DRUG TRAFFICKING AND GANGS .................................... 24 3.2 OTHER NON-STATE ACTORS ............................................................................................................. 27 3.3 POLICE, ARMY, AND THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM ............................................................................. 31 3.4 GEOGRAPHY OF VIOLENCE ............................................................................................................... 32 4. SELECTED HUMAN RIGHTS DEVELOPMENTS ................................................................................... 35 4.1 RIGHT TO LIFE, PERSONAL SECURITY AND PHYSICAL INTEGRITY ................................................... 35 4.2 TORTURE AND OTHER INHUMAN AND DEGRADING TREATMENT AND PUNISHMENT AND EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLINGS ....................................................................................................... 37 4.2.1 INHUMAN AND CRUEL TREATMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN ................................................................ 38 4.2.2 DETAINED/PRISONERS .............................................................................................................. 39 4.3 LAND AND PROPERTY RIGHTS ......................................................................................................... 40 4.4 RIGHTS OF MIGRANTS ...................................................................................................................... 42 5. SITUATION OF SPECIFIC PROFILES ............................................................................................. 43 5.1 INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ........................................................................................................................ 43 5.2 HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS............................................................................................................. 45 5.3 VICTIMS OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE .............................................................. 48 5.4 WOMEN AND CHILDREN WITH CERTAIN PROFILES OR IN SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES ......................... 51 5.4.1 Recruitment by gangs .................................................................................................................................... 52 5.4.2 Unaccompanied children that are returned to Guatemala and/or in transit ............................................. 53 5.5 LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER AND INTERSEX PERSONS ............................................... 54 5.6 GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC OFFICIALS ............................................................................................. 55 5.7 JOURNALISTS ................................................................................................................................... 56 5.8 BUS DRIVERS/OTHER DRIVERS ......................................................................................................... 57 5.9 UNION MEMBERS ............................................................................................................................. 58 5.10 RETURNED GUATEMALAN MIGRANTS .............................................................................................. 60 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................................63 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................................... 66 Acronyms CC Constitutional Court (Corte de Constitucionalidad) CICIG International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (Comisión Internacional contra la Impunidad en Guatemala) COPREDEH Presidential Coordinating Committee for Executive Policy on Human Rights (Comisión Presidencial Coordinadora de la Política del Ejecutivo en materia de Derechos Humanos) ESC Central America Security Strategy (Estrategia de Seguridad de Centroamerica) [under SICA’s Central America Security Commission (La Comisión de Seguridad de Centroamérica)] IACHR Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos—CIDH) I/A Court HR Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos—Corte IDH) ILO International Labour Organization INE National Statistics Institute (Instituto Nacional de Estadística) INACIF Guatemalan National Institute of Forensic Science (Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Forenses de Guatemala) MP Attorney General’s Office (Ministerio Público)1 OHCHR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights PDH Office of the Human Rights Ombudsman (Procuraduría de los Derechos Humanos) PNC National Civilian Police (Policía Nacional Civil) PP Patriotic Party (Partido Patriota) SICA Central American Integration System (Sistema de Integración Centroamericana) UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNE National Unity for Hope (Unidad Nacional de la Esperanza) UN-HABITAT United Nations Human Settlements Programme UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime 1 The Ministerio Público and its appointed head, the Fiscal General, are translated here as Attorney General’s office and Attorney General respectively. The function of this office is derived from Guatemala’s congressional law, Decree no. 40-94. Some translations use Public Ministry or Public Prosecutor’s Office for Ministerio Público. 1. INTRODUCTION The document presents a general overview of the human rights situation in Guatemala as it may affect the situation of persons originating from the country, who may, for reasons of their experiences in Guatemala, find themselves seeking asylum abroad. This document does not attempt to make any value judgment on the Guatemalan government or its policies or authorities but rather seeks to identify and describe, based on diverse and credible sources, situations affecting certain persons or groups that could give rise to the need for their international protection. Guatemala’s high levels of crime and violence persist despite a variety of efforts by the government and others to diminish these. Vulnerable groups and individuals remain disproportionately targeted and affected by this situation. The State’s limitations in protecting individuals and groups are acknowledged by the government as is the fact that sometimes State actors are complicit in such violence. The marked increase of organized crime activity in Guatemala is broadly documented as are indicators of how organized crime and related financial interests have infiltrated successive governments constituting what has been termed “parallel power structures” influencing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Isheries Surney
    ISHERIES SURNEY JUAGULTURE WED AQUACULTURES WON 0 0 0 0 LAKE IZABAL FISHERIES SURVEY INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AQUACULTURE DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND ALLIED AQUACULTURES AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION AUBURN UNIVERSITY AUBURN, ALABAMA 36830 Project: AID/cs'd-2-780 Date: September 5, 1973 LAKE JZABAL FISHERIES SURVEY by W.D. Davies Auburn University Auburn, Alabama 36830 Project: AID/csd-2780 Date of Survey: June 11 - 22, 1973 Date: September 5, 1973 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 ITINERARY .............................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................... 2 2.1 Guatemalan Geography and Population ............... 3 2.2 Fish Marketing and Consumption .................... 4 2.3 Government Division Responsible for Fisheries 6 2.4 Lake Izabal, El Golfete and the Rio Dulce Water Resources. ...................................... 7 3.0 THE FISHERIES ........................................... 8 3.1 Lake and River Fisheries ........................... 8 3.2 Fishing Regulations ................................ 10 3.3 Assessment of the Fishery .......................... 10 4.0 RECREATIONAL USE OF LAKE IZABAL, RIO DULCE AND EL GOLFETE......................................... 11 5.0 SUMMARY OF SURVEY AND PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS .. 12 5.1 Summary ....................... ................... 12 5.2 Recommended Scope of Work ........................ 13 5.3 Program Requirements .............................. 15 6.0 CONFERENCES ............................................ 17 7.0 LITERATURE CITED .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Guatemala Genocide Cases: Universal Jurisdiction and Its Limits
    © The Guatemala Genocide Cases: Universal Jurisdiction and Its Limits by Paul “Woody” Scott* INTRODUCTION Systematic murder, genocide, torture, terror and cruelty – all are words used to describe the campaigns of Guatemalan leaders, including President Jose Efrain Rios Montt, directed toward the indigenous Mayans in the Guatemalan campo. The United Nations-backed Truth Commission concludes that the state carried out deliberate acts of genocide against the Mayan indigenous populations.1 Since Julio Cesar Mendez Montenegro took Guatemalan presidential office in 1966, Guatemala was involved in a bloody civil war between the army and guerrilla groups located in the Guatemalan countryside. The bloodshed escalated as Montt, a fundamentalist Christian minister, rose to power in 1982 after taking part in a coup d’état and becoming the de facto president of Guatemala. He was in power for just sixteen months, considered by many to be the bloodiest period of Guatemala’s history.2 Under his sixteen-month rule, more than 200,000 people were victims of homicide or forced kidnappings, 83% of whom were of indigenous Mayan origin. Indigenous Mayans were targeted, killed, tortured, raped, and * Paul “Woody” Scott is an associate attorney with Jeri Flynn & Associates in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. His practice is primarily immigration law and criminal defense, specializing in defending immigrants charged with criminal offenses, and deportation defense. He was born in San Pedro Sula, Honduras and moved to the United States at a very early age. He is fluent in both English and Spanish. 1 United Nations Office for Project Services [UNOPS], Commission for Historical Clarification [CEH], Conclusions and Recommendations, GUATEMALA, MEMORIA DEL SILENCIO [hereinafter, GUATEMALA, MEMORY OF SILENCE], Volume V, ¶ 26 (1999).
    [Show full text]
  • USAID Report Template
    AHMID DACCARETT FOR UMG GUATEMALA URBAN MUNCIPAL GOVERNANCE (UMG) PROJECT QUARTERLY REPORT October 1 to December 31, 2019 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) by Tetra Tech through the Guatemala Urban Municipal Governance project Task Order under the Making Cities Work (MCW) Indefinite Quantity Contract (USAID Contract No. AID-OAA-1-14-00059, Task Order No. AID-520-TO-17-00001). Test This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) by Tetra Tech through the Guatemala Urban Municipal Governance Project Task Order under the Making Cities Work (MCW) Indefinite Quantity Contract (USAID Contract No. AID-OAA-I-14- 00059, Task Order No. AID-520-TO-17-00001). Tetra Tech Contacts: Brian Husler, Chief of Party [email protected] Christian Kolar, Project Manager [email protected] Tetra Tech 159 Bank Street, Suite 300, Burlington, VT 05401 Tel: 802-495-0282, Fax: 802 658-4247 www.tetratech.com/intdev COVER PHOTO: Closing ceremony of the vacation course led by the National Civil Police (PNC) for children and young people from Palencia, as a mean to prevent violence. December 2019. GUATEMALA URBAN MUNCIPAL GOVERNANCE QUARTERLY REPORT October 1 to December 31, 2019 JANUARY 2020 1 | GUATEMALA UMG: QUARTERLY REPORT, OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2019 CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 2. MAJOR ACTIVITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS 6 3. CROSS-CUTTING ACTIVITIES 22 ANNEX A. SUCCESS STORY 28 ANNEX B: PERFORMANCE
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Agreement on Human Settlements and Natural Resource Systems Analysis
    COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ON HUMAN SETTLEMENTS AND NATURAL RESOURCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS CENTRAL PLACE SYSTEMS IN GUATEMALA: THE FINDINGS OF THE INSTITUTO DE FOMENTO MUNICIPAL (A PRECIS AND TRANSLATION) RICHARD W. WILKIE ARMIN K. LUDWIG University of Massachusetts-Amherst Rural Marketing Centers Working Gro'p Clark University/Institute for Development Anthropology Cooperative Agreemeat (USAID) Clark University Institute for Development Anthropology International Development Program Suite 302, P.O. Box 818 950 Main Street 99 Collier Street Worcester, MA 01610 Binghamton, NY 13902 CENTRAL PLACE SYSTEMS IN GUATEMALA: THE FINDINGS OF THE INSTITUTO DE FOMENTO MUNICIPAL (A PRECIS AND TRANSLATION) RICHARD W. WILKIE ARMIN K. LUDWIG Univer ity of Massachusetts-Amherst Rural Marketing Centers Working Group Clark University/Institute for Development Anthropology Cooperative Agreement (USAID) August 1983 THE ORGANIZATION OF SPACE IN THE CENTRAL BELT OF GUATEMALA (ORGANIZACION DEL ESPACIO EN LA FRANJA CENTRAL DE LA REPUBLICA DE GUATEMALA) Juan Francisco Leal R., Coordinator of the Study Secretaria General del Consejo Nacional de Planificacion Economica (SGCNPE) and Agencia Para el Desarrollo Internacional (AID) Instituto de Fomento Municipal (INFOM) Programa: Estudios Integrados de las Areas Rurales (EIAR) Guatemala, Octubre 1981 Introduction In 1981 the Guatemalan Institute for Municipal Development (Instituto de Fomento Municipal-INFOM) under its program of Integrated Studies of Rural Areas (Est6dios Integrados de las Areas Rurales-EIAR) completed the work entitled Organizacion del Espcio en la Franja Centrol de la Republica de Guatemala (The Organization of Space in the Central Belt of Guatemala). This work had its origins in an agreement between the government of Guatemala, represented by the General Secretariat of the National Council for Economic Planning, and the government of the United States through its Agency for International Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerio De Salud Pública Y Asistencia Social Chiquimula
    MINISTERIO DE SALUD PÚBLICA Y ASISTENCIA SOCIAL Artículo 10, Numeral 2. Dirección y Teléfonos CHIQUIMULA Dirección Área de Salud, de Chiquimula 8a. Ave. 1-66 zona 1 Chiquimula Teléfono: 79329600 HOSPITAL TELÉFONO DIRECCIÓN Hospital Nacional de Chiquimula 7931-5555 2da. Calle 14-71 Zona1. Chiquimula CATALOGADO COMO DISTRITO DIRECCIÓN TELÉFONO Centro de Salud Tipo B Chiquimula 2da. Calle entre 14 y 15 Avenida 14-71 Zona 1 79422107 Puesto de Salud Maraxco Chiquimula En el Centro de Maraxco, Frente a Escuela Ocial Rural Primaria 79422107 Centro Comunitario Pinalito Chiquimula Camino Para el Cimarron, por la torre, aldea El Pinalito 79422107 Centro Comunitario Conacaste Chiquimula Primer Callejon a mano izquierda de la aldea El Conacaste 79422107 Centro Comunitario Shusho Arriba Chiquimula Calle Principal de la aldea Shusho Arriba 79422107 Centro Comunitario Ingeniero Chiquimula A un costado del campo de Futbol de la aldea el Ingeniero 79422107 Centro Comunitario Santa Barbara Chiquimula En el Centro de la aldea Santa Barbara 79422107 Centro Comunitario San Miguel Chiquimula Entrada principal de la aldea San Miguel 79422107 Centro Comunitario Palmarcito Chiquimula A un costado de la Escuela Ocial de la aldea El Palmarcito 79422107 Puesto de Salud El Morral Chiquimula Calle Principal de la aldea El Morral 79422107 Puesto de Salud Vado Hondo Chiquimula Carretera a Jocotan, despues del Puente Shutaque Vado Hondo 79422107 Centro Comunitario Hacienda el Santo Chiquimula Calle Principal de la aldea Hacienda el Santo 79422107 Centyro Comuntiario
    [Show full text]
  • The Toll of Gun Violence in America a Nation Of
    A NATION OF SURVIVORS THE TOLL OF GUN VIOLENCE IN AMERICA EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE ALL GUN VIOLENCE SURVIVORS, ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO SHARED THEIR PERSONAL STORIES FOR THIS REPORT. Cover photo by Jodi Miller March for Our Lives Columbus, OH, March 24, 2018 everytownresearch.org/nationofsurvivors 1 “THE FACT IS GUN VIOLENCE HAS TAKEN SO MANY LIVES. AND NOT JUST IN FLORIDA OR D.C. OR CHICAGO. GUN VIOLENCE IS EVERYWHERE AND, AS A NATION, WE NEED TO BE PAYING MORE ATTENTION TO THE PROBLEM.” ZION, GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION ADVOCATE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 GUN SUICIDES 6 GUN HOMICIDES 8 GUN INJURIES 10 GUN VIOLENCE AND CHILDREN AND TEENS 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND GUNS 14 HATE CRIMES WITH GUNS 16 CONCLUSION: IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE THIS WAY 18 everytownresearch.org/nationofsurvivors 3 INTRODUCTION America’s gun death rate is tragic and unique — 10 times higher than other high-income countries.1 In other words, by early February more Americans are killed with guns than are killed in our peer countries in an entire calendar year. Every year, over 36,000 Americans are killed in acts % of gun violence3 and approximately 100,000 more are shot and injured.4 With death and injury tolls this high, America is undeniably a nation of gun violence survivors. But the impact of gun violence 58 extends far beyond those killed or injured. OF AMERICAN ADULTS Gun violence in any form — whether a person witnessed an act of gun violence, was threatened OR SOMEONE THEY or wounded with a gun, or had someone they know or care for wounded or killed — can leave a lasting CARE FOR HAVE impact on individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discriminatory History of Gun Control David Babat University of Rhode Island
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2009 The Discriminatory History of Gun Control David Babat University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Babat, David, "The Discriminatory History of Gun Control" (2009). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 140. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/140http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/140 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. David Babat [email protected] The Discriminatory History of Gun Control Introduction Gun control in the United States is based on a long history of discrimination which continues to this day. While blacks were the first targets of gun control measures, different racial and ethnic minorities have been targeted over time, and today the poor now face economic discrimination in many gun control laws. Gun control may be portrayed as a measure to reduce crime,1 but even in its earliest forms firearms regulation has been used as a means to control specific societal groups by keeping them from possessing weapons. The first selectively restrictive gun control legislation was enacted in the pre-Revolution South and primarily aimed at keeping free blacks from owning firearms and maintaining a white monopoly on power. Many different forms of gun control laws were implemented before and after the Revolution to keep firearms out of African-American hands.
    [Show full text]
  • LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR a DAILY PUBLICATION of the DIALOGUE Monday, June 3, 2019
    LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR A DAILY PUBLICATION OF THE DIALOGUE www.thedialogue.org Monday, June 3, 2019 BOARD OF ADVISORS FEATURED Q&A TODAY’S NEWS Diego Arria Director, Columbus Group POLITICAL Devry Boughner Vorwerk Corporate VP, Global Corporate Affairs Has Trump Gone Canada Halts Cargill Operations at Joyce Chang Global Head of Research, Too Far With New Caracas Embassy JPMorgan Chase & Co. Canada is temporarily suspending Marlene Fernández operations at its embassy in Ven- Corporate Vice President for Tariffs on Mexico? Government Relations, ezuela. Canadian Foreign Minister Arcos Dorados Chrystia Freeland said foreign Peter Hakim embassies in the South American President Emeritus, country are unable to perform Inter-American Dialogue basic functions. Donna Hrinak Page 2 President, Boeing Latin America Jon Huenemann Retired VP, U.S. & Int’l Affairs, BUSINESS Philip Morris International James R. Jones Carnival Seeking Chairman, Monarch Global Strategies Dismissal of Cuba Craig A. Kelly Property Lawsuits Director, Americas International Gov’t Relations, Exxon Mobil Carnival Cruise Line is asking a U.S. court to dismiss lawsuits by John Maisto President Donald Trump last Thursday announced that the United States would impose new Director, U.S. Education tariffs on imports from Mexico beginning June 10, saying the country has failed to stop flows U.S. citizens who claim the com- Finance Group of migrants from coming to the United States. // File Photo: White House. pany profited from nationalized Nicolás Mariscal property in Cuba. Chairman, U.S. President Donald Trump announced last week that he Page 3 Grupo Marhnos would impose new tariffs that could rise as high as 25 per- Thomas F.
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Violence in Colombia a City in Colombia Tries to Address the Root Causes of Gun Violence
    News Gun violence in Colombia A city in Colombia tries to address the root causes of gun violence. Sophie Cousins reports. Fabián Parra was 11 years old when he A collaboration between the met- Since 2015 there has been an 80% joined a street gang. That was in 2011. ropolitan police and Universidad del decline in homicides in the eight Co- The gang dealt drugs and sometimes had Valle’s Instituto de Investigación y De- munas targeted, murders dropping to defend its territory with guns. The sarrollo en Prevención de la Violencia from 396 in 2015 to 81 in 2018. “I’ve territory was a small part of Comuna y Promoción de la Convivencia Social been involved in this type of work for a 18, a neighbourhood in Cali, Colombia, (Cisalva, Institute for Research and long time and I have never seen such a a city of 2.3 million people. Development in Violence Prevention reduction in homicides,” Gutiérrez adds. “When I was 16, a kid from another and Promotion of Social Coexistence), gang tried to shoot me,” Fabián says. “I the TIP programme has been providing fired back and hit him in the foot. After- comprehensive psychosocial support for It is imperative wards his friends came looking for me. around 1400 youths from eight of Cali’s that we directly They were going to kill me, so I had to most violent neighbourhoods, including “ leave the neighbourhood.” Comuna 18, since 2015. engage the young The year Fabián left Comuna 18, “Youths come into the programme people involved in it was already becoming a safer place.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in the United States and Norway
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations Sociology & Criminal Justice Summer 2016 What Can State Talk Tell Us About Punitiveness? A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in The United States and Norway Kimberlee G. Waggoner Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds Part of the Criminology Commons, Scandinavian Studies Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Recommended Citation Waggoner, Kimberlee G.. "What Can State Talk Tell Us About Punitiveness? A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in The United States and Norway" (2016). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Sociology & Criminal Justice, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/6e42-3262 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds/10 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology & Criminal Justice at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHAT CAN STATE TALK TELL US ABOUT PUNITIVENESS? A COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO POLITICAL MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORWAY by Kimberlee G. Waggoner B.S. May 2009, Northern Arizona University M.S. May 2011, Northern Arizona University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Randolph Myers (Director) Mona J.E. Danner (Member) Tim Goddard (Member) ABSTRACT WHAT CAN STATE TALK TELL US ABOUT PUNITIVENESS? A COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO POLITICAL MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORWAY Kimberlee G.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala: Squeezed Between Crime and Impunity
    GUATEMALA: SQUEEZED BETWEEN CRIME AND IMPUNITY Latin America Report N°33 – 22 June 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. ROOTS OF PROTRACTED CONFLICT AND PERVASIVE VIOLENCE ............. 2 A. CIVIL WAR .................................................................................................................................. 3 B. LEGACY OF THE CONFLICT ........................................................................................................... 4 C. PEACE AND DISILLUSION ............................................................................................................. 4 D. MONUMENTAL CHALLENGES ....................................................................................................... 6 III. CRIME AND THE STATE .............................................................................................. 8 A. THE ARMED FORCES .................................................................................................................... 8 B. FAILURE OF POLICE REFORM ....................................................................................................... 9 C. GANGS ....................................................................................................................................... 12 D. DRUG TRAFFICKING AND INSTABILITY ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Evaluation: Guatemala Country Report
    Impact Evaluation: Guatemala Country Report By Susan Berk-Seligson, Ph.D. Diana Orcés, Ph.D. Georgina Pizzolitto, M.A. Mitchell A. Seligson, Ph.D. Carole Wilson, Ph.D. The Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) Vanderbilt University This study was performed with support from the Program in Democracy and Governance of the United States Agency for International Development. The opinions expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the point of view of the United States Agency for International Development. Revised December 2014 Impact Evaluation Guatemala ‐ Report Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 I. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 II. Main Findings ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 III. Policy Recommendations
    [Show full text]