DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in the United States and Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in the United States and Norway Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations Sociology & Criminal Justice Summer 2016 What Can State Talk Tell Us About Punitiveness? A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in The United States and Norway Kimberlee G. Waggoner Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds Part of the Criminology Commons, Scandinavian Studies Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Recommended Citation Waggoner, Kimberlee G.. "What Can State Talk Tell Us About Punitiveness? A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in The United States and Norway" (2016). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Sociology & Criminal Justice, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/6e42-3262 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds/10 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology & Criminal Justice at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHAT CAN STATE TALK TELL US ABOUT PUNITIVENESS? A COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO POLITICAL MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORWAY by Kimberlee G. Waggoner B.S. May 2009, Northern Arizona University M.S. May 2011, Northern Arizona University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Randolph Myers (Director) Mona J.E. Danner (Member) Tim Goddard (Member) ABSTRACT WHAT CAN STATE TALK TELL US ABOUT PUNITIVENESS? A COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO POLITICAL MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORWAY Kimberlee G. Waggoner Old Dominion University, 2016 Director: Dr. Randy Myers Highlighting the culturally contingent nature of state reactions to crime, the present work focuses on state talk issued by the U.S. and Norwegian governments in the aftermath of politically motivated mass shootings. The research is guided by the question: how does state talk—conditioned by economic, political, and cultural forces—facilitate or constrain punitive responses to political mass shootings? Here, the focus is on the January 8th 2011 shooting of U.S. representative Gabrielle Giffords and her constituents and the July 22nd 2011 bombing of a government building and shooting of a youth political camp in Norway. These two cases illustrate how state talk can either help to escalate or moderate responses to horrific events. Situating state discourse in the context of American exceptionalism in the case of the United States and Scandinavian Exceptionalism in the case of Norway, the present study argues that state talk reflects and reinforces both the United States notably precarious and competitive social order and Norway’s comparatively less volatile and more cooperative social order. Analysis of both more and less incendiary government talk and the cultural factors that uphold the tone and content of such state talk is needed to better understand the role of government rhetoric in shaping responses to tragedy. The present work, relying on qualitative content analysis, examines government press releases, speech transcripts, and op-eds posted to government websites. Here, themes thought to constrain or facilitate punitive responses, derived from criminological literature, were applied to the state talk data. This approach reveals the divergent ways in which states talk about tragedy across cultures. I then link divergent state talk findings to politics and social life after January 8th and July 22nd to paint a picture of the dissimilar effects of state talk. In conclusion, I discuss policy considerations in light of these findings and future avenues of research. iv Copyright©, 2016, by Kimberlee G. Waggoner, All Rights Reserved. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The logical starting place here is to thank the members of my committee. Dr. Randy Myers, my chair, deserves all the thanks in the world for the immense amount of time and energy he put into making sure I had the feedback and guidance to move forward, even when I didn’t particularly feel like it. I would also be remiss not to thank Dr. Myers for advocating for graduate students from the very beginning of his career. This combined with his killer sense of humor and sharp mind is what makes him such a good mentor. Dr. Mona Danner, another person who has influenced me greatly, has also earned my gratitude for sharing her time, space, and expertise over the years. Her advocacy for women, advice on negotiation, and generosity are powerful. Last but certainly not least, many thanks to Dr. Tim Goddard who provided me with invaluable food for thought and detailed comments from afar. What a joy to have found an “outside” committee member who meshes so seamlessly with his “inside” counterparts. Thanks everyone for making defenses feel more like productive, intellectual conversations than torture sessions. Writing a dissertation isn’t easy, both for the person writing it and the people who have to put up with the person writing it. I thank Victoria Collins (aka Pinky), Favian Martin, Annie Lee, Melanie Holland, Richard Stringer, and Amanda Smith for all of their excellent ideas, support, and quality companionship over the years. Thanks to Isabel Shoultz aka my Swedish Spirit Guide for sharing her humor and Scandinavian expertise. Gina Champion, my childhood chum from the earliest days in Arizona, has earned herself a shout out, for surviving not one but two years living with me during the dissertation process. Finally, my family put up with me not coming home for years on end. Maybe you’ll see more of me now that I am done being a professional student. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................1 ORIGINS OF THE PRESENT STUDY ..............................................................................2 WHY STATE TALK MATTERS .......................................................................................3 THE ARGUMENT ..............................................................................................................5 RESEARCH QUESTION ....................................................................................................7 OVERVIEW OF THE DISSERTATION ............................................................................7 2. MAKING SENSE OF DIFFERENCE: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ..........................9 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................9 CRIME AND JUSTICE IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORWAY ..........................11 PUNITIVENESS: A COMPLEX AND CONTESTED CONCEPT .................................13 THE WELFARE STATE ..................................................................................................15 A TALE OF TWO POLITICAL CULTURES ..................................................................21 SOCIAL SOLIDARITY AND INTERPERSONAL TRUST ...........................................27 TRUST IN GOVERNMENT .............................................................................................30 INSECURITY AND FEAR OF CRIME ...........................................................................33 DIVERGENT PENAL SENSIBILITIES ..........................................................................36 WHY DOES STATE TALK MATTER? ..........................................................................45 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................46 3. METHODS ................................................................................................................................47 THE PRESENT STUDY ...................................................................................................47 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF QUALITATIVE METHODS IN CRIMINOLOGY ..............48 ANALYZING STATE TALK ...........................................................................................50 METHOD: QUALITATIVE CONTENT ANALYSIS .....................................................54 CODING AND ANALYSIS..............................................................................................57 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................58 4. FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................59 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................59 OVERVIEW OF THEME FREQUENCY ........................................................................59 JANUARY 8, 2011 ............................................................................................................61 JULY 22, 2011 ...................................................................................................................63 CONSTRAINTS ................................................................................................................64
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Comments
    Timestamp Meeting Date Agenda Item First and Last Name Zip Code Representing Comments It is inappropriate to use an obviously biased company for Arizona’s redistricting mapping process. Bernie Sanders and Barack Obama should have zero say in what our maps look like, and these companies are funded by them at the national level. We want you to hire the National Demographics Corporation – Douglas Johnson in order to assure Arizonans of fair representation and elections. The “Independent” Review Council should make amends for ten years of incompetence and corruption. The commissioners met as many as five times at the home of the AZ 4/27/2021 9:12:25 April 27, 2021 Redistricting Marta 85331 Democratic Party’s Executive Director! It is inappropriate to use an obviously biased company for Arizona’s redistricting mapping process. Bernie Sanders and Barack Obama should have zero say in what our maps look like, and these companies are funded by them at the national level. We want you to hire the National Demographics Corporation – Douglas Johnson in order to assure Arizonans of fair representation and elections. The “Independent” Review Council should make amends for ten years of incompetence Redistricting and corruption. The commissioners met as many as five times at the home of the AZ 4/27/2021 9:12:47 April 27, 2021 Company Michael MacBan 85331 Democratic Party’s Executive Director! I would l ke to request that the company to be hired is the National Demographics Corporation – Douglas Johnson, in order to assure Arizonans fair representation and redistricting elections. mapping It would be inappropriate to use a biased company for the redistricting mapping process.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Program__Zheng Zhou.Pdf (7.193Mb)
    OSLO STORIES Learning Centre of 22.July Author Zheng Zhou Supervisor Prof. Beate Marie Hølmebakk April 30, 2018 CONTENT I SYNOPSIS The Evolutionary Revelation I SYNOPSIS The development of a city is accompanied by many stories, and the stories which contain deeply painful II INTRODUCTION can catalyze the maturity and inspire the thinking. Such stories are often be treated as sensitive topics in III FIELD OF INTEREST the moment, and their revelation comes from the wakefulness brought on by pain. However, by time pro- gresses, the wound will eventually heal. So what kind of revelation should we leave behind for our future IV CONTEXT generations? And how should they think about it? There is no doubt that this story is an intangible result of V OUTLINE OF CATEGORY an disaster, but it’s positive value could be realized with architectural language. My project will be an ex- VI FOCUS AND METHOD perience-oriented learning center the Olso city, which based on the Norway terrorist attacks that occurred VII RELEVANT EXAMPLES on July 22, 2011. On the way of exploring, I would also like to discusses the transformation of public identity, VIII WORK FORMAT architectural potential, and common value in the process of urban evolution. IX WORK PLAN II INTRODUCTION Architecture is built. Entrance area with staffed reception (minimum 1 person) The verification of architectural quality comes through perception of built space. Office (minimum 2 people) Meeting room Student’s projects are rarely built, thus the quality of this work must be discussed on other terms than Small coffeeshop (bar + seating for minimum 20 people) those applied on work that is realized.
    [Show full text]
  • We Rise Again Songs of Peace, Protest and Freedom
    Valentine‛s Day is just around the corner. Let that special someone know how much you care. E TH 10% off any arrangement Use discount code: RWC ™ Offer expires 06/30/2015 Enhance any occasion Balloon Deliveries Private / Corporate Event Decor Graduations Baskets 408) 370-1075 www.BalloonCrew.com Order Early Rainbow Women’s Chorus Staff Ruth Huber, Co-Artistic Director, Composer-in-Residence Ruth Huber was instrumental in founding both RWC and Tapestry Singers (the Austin Women’s Chorus). She holds three music degrees, including a Master of Music in Composition from the San Francisco Conservatory, and has studied conducting at San Jose State University. Her compositions and songs have won awards from the American Choral Directors Association, the San Francisco ArtSong Competition, and the Austin Music Umbrella Songwriters Competition, and she receives commissions from choral groups around the country. A certified member of Music Teachers National Association, she teaches piano, serves as Music Director for Campbell United Congregational Church and resides in San Jose with her wife, Brenda Meng, and an assortment of adorable cats. Betsy Wagner, Co-Artistic Director, Choralographer Betsy Wagner has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Music Education with a dual major in voice and piano from Louisiana Tech University in Ruston, LA. She has been teaching music to students in grades K-12 since 1978. Since coming to the Bay Area in 1990, she has built an award-winning choir program at Morrill Middle School in San Jose. Betsy has been singing with Rainbow Women’s Chorus since 1997 and has been co-director since 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Erosion in Arizona and New Mexico By
    Democratic Erosion in Arizona and New Mexico A comparative analysis on the divergence of border states over time. Capstone Thesis with Professor Sperber by: Cristin Espinoza Published March 2018 at the University of Denver 1. Introduction. Whereas former US Supreme Court Chief Justice Brandeis once described US states as laboratories of democracy, recent scholarship on democratic erosion calls for scholars to reconsider the degree to which US states may also serve as laboratories for authoritarian practices (Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018). In this paper, I seek to advance the understanding of democratic erosion. First, I establish empirical variation in the level of democratic erosion across two US southern border states: Arizona and New Mexico. I also demonstrate that although journalistic accounts often emphasize the role of demography and geography as determinants of voter suppression, redistricting, populist rhetoric, and even racial profiling practices in Arizona, the aforementioned factors are more similar than different across Arizona and New Mexico. Instead, I evaluate the hypothesis that long-run historical differences have influenced democratic erosion in these cases in ways previously overlooked. Specifically, I consider whether stronger Native American defense against white settlement in Arizona constituted a critical juncture that led to significantly more exclusive and ethnically charged state-level politics in Arizona than in neighboring New Mexico. To evaluate this hypothesis rigorously, I consider additional, competing hypotheses, including the possibility that rapid growth of Arizona’s older white population in recent decades, or differences in recent immigration flows may have steered the state in a less democratic direction than its neighbor. I find little evidence that these factors can explain what I demonstrate are longer-run political differences across state lines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’S Radicalization and Attack Planning
    The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam i The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam ICCT Perspective December 2020 ii About ICCT The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague (ICCT) is an independent think and do tank providing multidisciplinary policy advice and practical, solution- oriented implementation support on prevention and the rule of law, two vital pillars of effective counterterrorism. ICCT’s work focuses on themes at the intersection of countering violent extremism and criminal justice sector responses, as well as human rights-related aspects of counterterrorism. The major project areas concern countering violent extremism, rule of law, foreign fighters, country and regional analysis, rehabilitation, civil society engagement and victims’ voices. Functioning as a nucleus within the international counter-terrorism network, ICCT connects experts, policymakers, civil society actors and practitioners from different fields by providing a platform for productive collaboration, practical analysis, and exchange of experiences and expertise, with the ultimate aim of identifying innovative and comprehensive approaches to preventing and countering terrorism. Licensing and Distribution ICCT publications are published in open access format and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Remarks on the Shootings In
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Remarks on the Shootings in Tucson, Arizona January 8, 2011 As many of you are aware, earlier today a number of people were shot in Tucson, Arizona, including several who were meeting at a supermarket with their Congresswoman, Gabrielle Giffords. We are still assembling all the facts, but we know that Representative Giffords was one of the victims. She is currently at a hospital in the area, and she is battling for her life. We also know that at least five people lost their lives in this tragedy. Among them were a Federal judge, John Roll, who has served America's legal system for almost 40 years, and a young girl who was barely 9 years old. I've spoken to Arizona Governor Jan Brewer and offered the full resources of the Federal Government. A suspect is currently in custody, but we don't yet know what provoked this unspeakable act. A comprehensive investigation is currently underway, and at my direction, Director Bob Mueller is en route to Arizona to help coordinate these efforts. I've also spoken to the Democratic and Republican leaders in the House. Gabby Giffords was a friend of mine. She is not only an extraordinary public servant, but she is also somebody who is warm and caring. She is well liked by her colleagues and well liked by her constituents. Her husband, Mark Kelly, is a Navy captain and one of America's valiant astronauts. It's not surprising that today Gabby was doing what she always does: listening to the hopes and concerns of her neighbors.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminalization of Sex Work in Norway
    THE HUMAN COST OF ‘CRUSHING’ THE MARKET CRIMINALIZATION OF SEX WORK IN NORWAY Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2016 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: Empty street in Oslo in area where sex is sold. (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. © Samfoto Dagsavisen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2016 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: EUR/36/4034/2016 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 METHODOLOGY 14 1. HUMAN RIGHTS AND COMMERCIAL SEX IN NORWAY 16 1.1 “The Nordic Model” 18 1.2 Norway’s Human Rights obligations 19 2. HOW NORWAY HARDENED ITS APPROACH TOWARDS COMMERCIAL SEX 21 2.1 Changing demographics: An increasingly internationalized context 21 2.2 Expansion and contraction: the developing indoor market and subsequent crackdowns 22 2.3 The “threat” of foreign prostitution and human trafficking concerns 23 2.4 The introduction of the ban on purchasing sex 25 2.5 Current legal framework 26 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 159 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2013 No. 22 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was tion, and that is the $28 million a day Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Speaker, called to order by the Speaker. we are spending to rebuild Afghani- one of the few areas where Washington f stan. We could use that $28 million a agrees with the general public is that day to fix our own roads and our own our current path is not sustainable. It MORNING-HOUR DEBATE schools right here in America. is not merely a case of spending too The SPEAKER. Pursuant to the Yesterday on C–SPAN, I heard the much or taxing too little, although we order of the House of January 3, 2013, Special Inspector General for Afghan need to control spending and we must the Chair will now recognize Members Reconstruction, John Sopko, speak and will be raising revenue to meet the from lists submitted by the majority about how much money we are spend- needs of an aging and growing popu- and minority leaders for morning-hour ing in Afghanistan and the fact that it lation. debate. is impossible to give the American tax- The key is to do business differently, The Chair will alternate recognition payers an account of where the money to extract more value out of our pro- between the parties, with each party is going. I think Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toll of Gun Violence in America a Nation Of
    A NATION OF SURVIVORS THE TOLL OF GUN VIOLENCE IN AMERICA EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE ALL GUN VIOLENCE SURVIVORS, ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO SHARED THEIR PERSONAL STORIES FOR THIS REPORT. Cover photo by Jodi Miller March for Our Lives Columbus, OH, March 24, 2018 everytownresearch.org/nationofsurvivors 1 “THE FACT IS GUN VIOLENCE HAS TAKEN SO MANY LIVES. AND NOT JUST IN FLORIDA OR D.C. OR CHICAGO. GUN VIOLENCE IS EVERYWHERE AND, AS A NATION, WE NEED TO BE PAYING MORE ATTENTION TO THE PROBLEM.” ZION, GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION ADVOCATE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 GUN SUICIDES 6 GUN HOMICIDES 8 GUN INJURIES 10 GUN VIOLENCE AND CHILDREN AND TEENS 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND GUNS 14 HATE CRIMES WITH GUNS 16 CONCLUSION: IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE THIS WAY 18 everytownresearch.org/nationofsurvivors 3 INTRODUCTION America’s gun death rate is tragic and unique — 10 times higher than other high-income countries.1 In other words, by early February more Americans are killed with guns than are killed in our peer countries in an entire calendar year. Every year, over 36,000 Americans are killed in acts % of gun violence3 and approximately 100,000 more are shot and injured.4 With death and injury tolls this high, America is undeniably a nation of gun violence survivors. But the impact of gun violence 58 extends far beyond those killed or injured. OF AMERICAN ADULTS Gun violence in any form — whether a person witnessed an act of gun violence, was threatened OR SOMEONE THEY or wounded with a gun, or had someone they know or care for wounded or killed — can leave a lasting CARE FOR HAVE impact on individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Innst. S. Nr. 102 (2004-2005) Innstilling Til Stortinget Fra Justiskomiteen
    Innst. S. nr. 102 (2004-2005) Innstilling til Stortinget fra justiskomiteen Dokument nr. 8:21 (2004-2005) Innstilling fra justiskomiteen om forslag fra stor- sammenheng med flere ting; antall fritidsbåter har økt tingsrepresentantene Grethe Fossli, Olav Akselsen, betydelig de seinere årene, båtene blir større og større, Bendiks H. Arnesen, Svein Roald Hansen og Gunn det samme gjelder motorene. I tillegg har mange svært Karin Gjul om obligatorisk opplæring av førere av avansert utstyr som er komplisert å bruke. I tillegg til at fritidsbåter en del av båtførerne ikke har kunnskaper nok i forhold til å føre båt, så spiller nok også bruk av alkohol en rolle i en del av ulykkene. Til Stortinget I EU skal det nå være under arbeid et felles opplegg for obligatorisk båtføreropplæring, flere land i Europa har allerede innført opplæringen. SAMMENDRAG Stortingsrepresentantene Grethe Fossli, Olav Aksel- KOMITEENS MERKNADER sen, Bendiks H. Arnesen, Svein Roald Hansen og Komiteen, medlemmene fra Arbeider- Gunn Karin Gjul, har den 11. november 2004 fremmet partiet, Gunn Karin Gjul, Anne Helen følgende forslag: Rui og Knut Storberget, fra Høyre, lede- ren Trond Helleland, Linda Cathrine "Stortinget ber Regjeringen fremme forslag om obli- Hofstad og Ingjerd Schou, fra Frem- gatorisk båtføreropplæring." skrittspartiet, Jan Arild Ellingsen og André Kvakkestad, fra Kristelig Folke- I begrunnelsen for forslaget vises det til at de fleste parti, Einar Holstad og Finn Kristian ulykker med fritidsfartøyer er forårsaket av høy fart, Marthinsen, og fra Sosialistisk Venstre- bruk av rusmidler, manglende redningsutstyr og man- parti, Inga Marte Thorkildsen, viser til det glende maritim kompetanse. fremlagte forslaget i Dokument nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo Tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-24 - RG-2012-1153
    Utskrift fra Lovdata - 17.01.2018 09:02 Oslo tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-24 - RG-2012-1153 Instans Oslo tingrett - Dom. Dato 2012-08-24 Publisert TOSLO-2011-188627-24 - RG-2012-1153 Stikkord (22. juli-saken / 22. juli-dommen) Strafferett. Terror. Drap. Sprengning. Tilregnelighet. Forvaring. Straffeloven § 39c, § 44, straffeloven § 147a første ledd bokstav a og b, jf. straffeloven § 148 første ledd 1. straffalternativ og § 233 første og annet ledd, jf. § 49. Sammendrag En 32 år gammel mann ble for to terrorhandlinger der blant annet 77 personer ble drept, dømt til 21 års forvaring med en minstetid på 10 år. Tiltalte drepte 8 og skadet 9 personer alvorlig da han sprengte en bombe i Regjeringskvartalet i Oslo. Eksplosjonen forårsaket også omfattende materielle ødeleggelser. Samme dag drepte gjerningsmannen 69 personer på Utøya, flertallet av disse var deltakere på AUFs sommerleir. I tillegg ble 33 ungdommer skadet. Foruten de fysiske skadene ble et stort antall personer påført psykiske lidelser. Tiltalte ble av retten funnet å være tilregnelig, dvs. ikke psykotisk, på gjerningstidspunktet. Retten har en omfattende og grundig vurdering av om vilkårene for tilregnelighet er oppfylt. Han kunne dermed idømmes straff. Saksgang Oslo tingrett TOSLO-2011-188627-24 (11-188627MED-OTIR/05). Rettskraftig. Parter Den offentlige påtalemyndighet (statsadvokat Svein Holden og statsadvokat Inga Bejer Engh) mot A (advokat Geir Lippestad, advokat Vibeke Hein Bæra, advokat Tord Eskild Kvinge Jordet og advokatfullmektig Odd Ivar Aursnes Grøn). Forfatter Rettens leder tingrettsdommer Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen, fagdommer tingrettsdommer Arne Lyng. Meddommere: Ernst Henning Eielsen, Diana Patricia Fynbo, Anne Elisabeth Wisløff. Sist oppdatert 2018-01-17 TOSLO-2011-188627-24 - RG-2012-1153 Side 1 Utskrift fra Lovdata - 17.01.2018 09:02 Side 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discriminatory History of Gun Control David Babat University of Rhode Island
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2009 The Discriminatory History of Gun Control David Babat University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Babat, David, "The Discriminatory History of Gun Control" (2009). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 140. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/140http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/140 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. David Babat [email protected] The Discriminatory History of Gun Control Introduction Gun control in the United States is based on a long history of discrimination which continues to this day. While blacks were the first targets of gun control measures, different racial and ethnic minorities have been targeted over time, and today the poor now face economic discrimination in many gun control laws. Gun control may be portrayed as a measure to reduce crime,1 but even in its earliest forms firearms regulation has been used as a means to control specific societal groups by keeping them from possessing weapons. The first selectively restrictive gun control legislation was enacted in the pre-Revolution South and primarily aimed at keeping free blacks from owning firearms and maintaining a white monopoly on power. Many different forms of gun control laws were implemented before and after the Revolution to keep firearms out of African-American hands.
    [Show full text]