DOCSLIB.ORG

The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’S Radicalization and Attack Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’S Radicalization and Attack Planning The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam i The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam ICCT Perspective December 2020 ii About ICCT The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague (ICCT) is an independent think and do tank providing multidisciplinary policy advice and practical, solution- oriented implementation support on prevention and the rule of law, two vital pillars of effective counterterrorism. ICCT’s work focuses on themes at the intersection of countering violent extremism and criminal justice sector responses, as well as human rights-related aspects of counterterrorism. The major project areas concern countering violent extremism, rule of law, foreign fighters, country and regional analysis, rehabilitation, civil society engagement and victims’ voices. Functioning as a nucleus within the international counter-terrorism network, ICCT connects experts, policymakers, civil society actors and practitioners from different fields by providing a platform for productive collaboration, practical analysis, and exchange of experiences and expertise, with the ultimate aim of identifying innovative and comprehensive approaches to preventing and countering terrorism. Licensing and Distribution ICCT publications are published in open access format and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. ICCT Perspective December 2020 ISSN: 2468-0486 iii Contents What do we know about the perpetrator’s radicalization process? 1 Did the internet have a particularly important role in his radicalization process? 2 What does the report say about how the attack was planned? 3 Conclusion 4 Bibliography 6 About the Authors 8 iv What do we know about the perpetrator’s radicalization process? On 8 December 2020, the Royal Commission of Inquiry terventions from anti-racism officers due to anti-semitic in New Zealand released its report into the 15 March remarks, and point to a nonconformist personality, along 2019 Christchurch mosque shooting during which 51 with the development of more extreme views. Muslim worshippers were killed.1 The nearly 800 page report concludes that despite shortcomings on the part However, as Borum and Schuurman and Taylor note, of various security agencies, there was no clear signs having extreme beliefs does not mean that an individ- the attack was imminent, and made 44 recommenda- ual will engage in violence.4 Many people with similar tions, ranging from improvements to counter-terrorism, personality types, beliefs, or traits to Tarrant’s do not firearms licencing, calls for new legislation to criminalize commit attacks. McCauley and Moskalenko state that planning or preparing a terrorist attack, and strengthen- “individuals with radical ideas are 100 times more com- ing existing laws around hate-speech. mon than individuals involved in radical action; targeting ideas rather than actions multiplies the enemy by a fac- After conducting more than 400 interviews, and comb- tor of a hundred.”5 ing through over 73,000 pages of evidence and sub- missions, the report took about 18 months to draft. The This points to what scholars of radicalization and ter- interviews included Muslim community leaders, gov- rorism have labeled the “specificity problem”, which as ernmental agency officials - including police, customs, Lorne Dawson notes, is “at the core of all analyses of immigration and intelligence services - along with ex- the process of radicalization.”6 The specificity problem perts and officials in England, Norway, and Australia. In is defined simply as follows: a manner similar to the Gjørv Report commissioned after the 2011 Norway attacks,2 this report provides the public “whenever we encounter an explanation of why with an exhaustive and clear picture of the perpetrator, some person or group has engaged in terrorism, his process of radicalization, and his plan of attack. In we need to ask if the causal factors identified are what follows, we summarize and contextualize, based sufficiently specific to explain why that person or on the academic literature, these three important ele- group engaged in violence, since, more often than ments of the attack. not, the factors apply equally well to a wider set of individuals who did not become violent.”7 What do we know In other words, while the report places much emphasis on Tarrant’s time online, his travel experiences, and his about the perpetrator’s struggles in early childhood, none of these are “suffi- ciently specific” to be explanatory in themselves. radicalization process? What also remains wanting in the report is a deeper ex- While the report is quite clear in detailing Tarrant’s pro- amination of why some of the early interventions did not cess of radicalization, it is also the aspect of the report prove effective. We know from the report that Tarrant that, for radicalization researchers, feels a little incom- was racist, spewing hate speech, and engaging with plete. Just as pathways to terrorism are a personal pro- hateful online content since his teenage years. It is also cess with divergent factors, this can also be said for the clear from the report that this did not go unchallenged process of radicalization. Sageman and McCauley and or unnoticed. As the report states, “He was twice dealt Moskalenko note that there are two types of radicali- with by one of his high school teachers, who was also zation.3 The first is gaining extreme beliefs, or what is the Anti-Racism Contact Officer, in respect of anti-Sem- known as “cognitive radicalization,” while the second is itism.”8 As the report acknowledges, some of this kind a change in behavior which can lead to violence, known of racism and hate speech would not have raised the as “behavioral radicalization.” The report outlines Tar- same kind of alarm bells as, by way of comparison, an in- rant’s shift from cognitive to behavioral radicalization dividual spewing jihadist rhetoric. Even still, it would be in a rather unexceptional way. Various factors including important to know more about the kinds of interventions a broken home, unrestricted and unsupervised access that were attempted with Tarrant, and whether there are to the Internet, the consumption of far-right literature, a any lessons that could be learned about why such early lack of personal connections, a “loner” type personality, diversion strategies did not work. and behavioral worries. These resulted in two school in- 1 “Ko Tō Tātou Kāinga Tēnei, Report: Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Terrorist Attack on Christchurch Masjidain on 15 March 2019” (The Royal Commission, December 2, 2020), https://christchurchattack.royalcommission.nz/the-report/. 2 Rapport fra 22. juli-kommisjonen: Oppnevnt ved kongelig resolusjon 12. august 2011 for å gjennomgå og trekke lærdom fra angrepene på regjeringskvartalet og Utøya 22. juli 2011 : Avgitt til statsministeren 13. august 2012. (Oslo: Departementenes Servicesenter, 2012), https://www. regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2012-14/id697260/. 3 Marc Sageman, Misunderstanding Terrorism (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017); Clark R. McCauley and Sophia Moskalenko, Friction: How Conflict Radicalizes Them and Us, Revised and expanded edition (Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2017). 4 Randy Borum, “Radicalization into Violent Extremism II: A Review of Conceptual Models and Empirical Research,” Journal of Strategic Security 4, no. 4 (December 2011): 37–62, https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.2; Bart Schuurman and Max Taylor, “Reconsidering Radicalization: Fanaticism and the Link Between Ideas and Violence” 12, no. 1 (2018): 20. 5 McCauley and Moskalenko, Friction, 274. 6 Lorne Dawson, “Clarifying the Explanatory Context for Developing Theories of Radicalization: Five Basic Considerations,” Journal for Deradicalization 18 (2019): 149. 7 Ibid. 8 “Ko Tō Tātou Kāinga Tēnei, 168. 1 Did the internet have a particularly important role in his radicalization process? have started frequenting the imageboard website 4chan Did the internet have a - a notorious hotbed of white supremacist and conspir- atorial content14 - at the age of 14, around the time he particularly important started expressing racist ideas. role in his radicalization The influence of 4chan’s subculture is apparent in Tar- rant’s manifesto. Robert Evans shows how Tarrant’s process? manifesto employs “shitposting,” a tactic used to distract a general audience away from an intended meaning, Despite attempts to conceal some of his online activities while grabbing the attention of its targeted audience.15 - including purging his Facebook profile in 2018, using Notable far-right memes are also used in this way, pro- Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), Tor browsers, encrypt- viding a sense of solidarity and unification among those ing emails, deleting emails, and removing a hard drive familiar with the memes in the manifesto and the inter- from his computer prior to the attack - Tarrant still left a net culture surrounding them.16 Consequently, the man- significant digital footprint. His online activities prior to ifesto can be seen as a coded document
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: to Stop the Defamation of the Jewish People and to Secure Justice and Fair Treatment for All
    A report from the Center on Extremism 09 18 New Hate and Old: The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment for all. ABOUT T H E CENTER ON EXTREMISM The ADL Center on Extremism (COE) is one of the world’s foremost authorities ADL (Anti-Defamation on extremism, terrorism, anti-Semitism and all forms of hate. For decades, League) fights anti-Semitism COE’s staff of seasoned investigators, analysts and researchers have tracked and promotes justice for all. extremist activity and hate in the U.S. and abroad – online and on the ground. The staff, which represent a combined total of substantially more than 100 Join ADL to give a voice to years of experience in this arena, routinely assist law enforcement with those without one and to extremist-related investigations, provide tech companies with critical data protect our civil rights. and expertise, and respond to wide-ranging media requests. Learn more: adl.org As ADL’s research and investigative arm, COE is a clearinghouse of real-time information about extremism and hate of all types. COE staff regularly serve as expert witnesses, provide congressional testimony and speak to national and international conference audiences about the threats posed by extremism and anti-Semitism. You can find the full complement of COE’s research and publications at ADL.org. Cover: White supremacists exchange insults with counter-protesters as they attempt to guard the entrance to Emancipation Park during the ‘Unite the Right’ rally August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/29/2021 06:39:09AM Via Free Access
    fascism 4 (2015) 209-212 brill.com/fasc Book Review ∵ Mats Deland, Michael Minkenberg and Christin Mays, ed. In the Tracks of Breivik: Far Right Networks in Northern and Eastern Europe (Berlin/ Vienna: lit Verlag, 2014). Four years have already passed since Anders Behring Breivik, apparently single-handedly, committed the most murderous and destructive terrorist atrocity by the far right in post-war Europe. In 2011–2012, particularly during his criminal trial in Oslo, there was a lively public debate in in the Scandinavian media as to whether Breivik was a fascist, or represented some other permuta- tion of the contemporary European far right – an Islamophobic ‘counter-jihad- ist’; a militant, conservative nationalist; or a Christian extremist.1 Somewhat counterintuitively, since then relatively little scholarly attention has been devoted within comparative fascist studies to the implications of Breivik’s deeds, ideology, and self-proclaimed pan-European revolutionary movement. The title of this anthology – In the Tracks of Breivik – would suggest that its primary purpose is to map the far right networks of northern and eastern Europe in relation to the terrorist acts of July 22, 2011. Even if we realize that this formulation is an unfortunate literal translation of the Swedish phrase ‘i spåren av [Breivik]’ – for which a more idiomatic English rendering would be ‘in the wake of [Breivik]’, the implication would still be that the findings of the book are located in some direct relation to Breivik and his crimes. Even the promotional blurb on the back cover, as well as the opening and closing words of the introduction, reinforce this expectation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pepe the Frog
    PEPE THE FROG: A Case Study of the Internet Meme and its Potential Subversive Power to Challenge Cultural Hegemonies by BEN PETTIS A THESIS Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Robert D. Clark Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts Spring 2018 An Abstract of the Thesis of Ben Pettis for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the School of Journalism and Communication to be taken Spring 2018 Title: Pepe the Frog: A Case Study of the Internet Meme and Its Potential Subversive Power to Challenge Cultural Hegemonies Approved: _______________________________________ Dr. Peter Alilunas This thesis examines Internet memes, a unique medium that has the capability to easily and seamlessly transfer ideologies between groups. It argues that these media can potentially enable subcultures to challenge, and possibly overthrow, hegemonic power structures that maintain the dominance of a mainstream culture. I trace the meme from its creation by Matt Furie in 2005 to its appearance in the 2016 US Presidential Election and examine how its meaning has changed throughout its history. I define the difference between a meme instance and the meme as a whole, and conclude that the meaning of the overall meme is formed by the sum of its numerous meme instances. This structure is unique to the medium of Internet memes and is what enables subcultures to use them to easily transfer ideologies in order to challenge the hegemony of dominant cultures. Dick Hebdige provides a model by which a dominant culture can reclaim the images and symbols used by a subculture through the process of commodification.
    [Show full text]
  • POPULAR SOCIAL MEDIA SITES Below Is a List of Some of the Most Commonly Used Youth and Teen Social Networking Sites and Tools
    POPULAR SOCIAL MEDIA SITES Below is a list of some of the most commonly used youth and teen social networking sites and tools. Ask.fm (http://ask.fm) Participants log on, post a question anonymously and anyone may answer anonymously. “Do you think I am fat?” or “Would you date me?” are examples of questions posted in the past. There have also been examples in which individuals were encouraged to kill themselves. The site has courted controversy by not having workable reporting, tracking or parental control processes, which have become the norm on other social media websites. Twitter (https://twitter.com) An online social networking and microblogging service that enables users to send and read "tweets", which are text messages limited to 140 characters. Instagram (http://instagram.com) A photo-sharing app for iPhone. Kik (http://kik.com) Kik is as an alternative to email or text messaging and its popularity has grown in the last two years. Kik is accessible on smartphones and supports over 4 million users, called “Kicksters.” Users are not restricted to sending text messages with Kik. Images, videos, sketches, emoticions and more may be sent. A user can block users on Kik from contacting them. Wanelo (http://wanelo.com) Wanelo (from Want, Need, Love) sells unique products online, all posted by users. Products posted for sale range from dishes, clothing, intimate wear and other potentially “R-Rated” products. Vine (https://vine.co) Vine is used to create and share free and instant six-second videos. Topic and content ranges. Snapchat (http://www.snapchat.com) A photo messaging application.
    [Show full text]
  • Extracting Inter-Community Conflicts in Reddit
    Extracting Inter-community Conflicts in Reddit Srayan Datta Eytan Adar University of Michigan University of Michigan [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Anti-social behaviors in social media can happen both at user and community levels. While a great deal of attention is on the individual as an ‘aggressor,’ the banning of entire Reddit subcommunities (i.e., subreddits) demonstrates that this is a multi-layer concern. Existing research on inter-community conflict has largely focused on specific subcommunities or ideological opponents. However, antago- nistic behaviors may be more pervasive and integrate into the broader network. In this work, we study the landscape of conflicts among subreddits by deriving higher-level (community) behaviors from the way individuals are sanctioned and rewarded. By constructing a conflict network, we characterize different patterns in subreddit-to-subreddit conflicts as well as communities of ‘co-targeted’ sub- reddits. By analyzing the dynamics of these interactions, we also observe that the conflict focus shifts over time. keywords: Inter-group conflict, Reddit, social network analysis, conflict network 1 Introduction Anti-social behavior in social media is not solely an individual process. Communities can, and do, antagonize other groups with anti-social behaviors. Similarly, both individuals and communities can be sanctioned in reaction to this behavior. On Reddit, for example, individuals can be banned or otherwise be sanctioned (e.g., have their posts down-voted). Likewise, entire subreddits can also be sanctioned when multiple individuals use the community as a platform for generating conflict, in violation of general Reddit norms. Critically, the form of anti-social behavior at the community level can be quite varied.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Emergence of Sinophobic Behavior on Web Communities In
    “Go eat a bat, Chang!”: On the Emergence of Sinophobic Behavior on Web Communities in the Face of COVID-19 Fatemeh Tahmasbi Leonard Schild Chen Ling Binghamton University CISPA Boston University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jeremy Blackburn Gianluca Stringhini Yang Zhang Binghamton University Boston University CISPA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Savvas Zannettou Max Planck Institute for Informatics [email protected] ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has changed our lives in COVID-19, Sinophobia, Hate Speech, Twitter, 4chan unprecedented ways. In the face of the projected catastrophic conse- ACM Reference Format: quences, most countries have enacted social distancing measures in Fatemeh Tahmasbi, Leonard Schild, Chen Ling, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca an attempt to limit the spread of the virus. Under these conditions, Stringhini, Yang Zhang, and Savvas Zannettou. 2021. “Go eat a bat, Chang!”: the Web has become an indispensable medium for information ac- On the Emergence of Sinophobic Behavior on Web Communities in the quisition, communication, and entertainment. At the same time, Face of COVID-19. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (WWW ’21), unfortunately, the Web is being exploited for the dissemination April 19–23, 2021, Ljubljana, Slovenia. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12 pages. of potentially harmful and disturbing content, such as the spread https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450024 of conspiracy theories and hateful speech towards specific ethnic groups, in particular towards Chinese people and people of Asian 1 INTRODUCTION descent since COVID-19 is believed to have originated from China.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Gab? a Bastion of Free Speech Or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?
    What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber? Savvas Zannettou Barry Bradlyn Emiliano De Cristofaro Cyprus University of Technology Princeton Center for Theoretical Science University College London [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Haewoon Kwak Michael Sirivianos Gianluca Stringhini Qatar Computing Research Institute Cyprus University of Technology University College London & Hamad Bin Khalifa University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jeremy Blackburn University of Alabama at Birmingham [email protected] ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: Over the past few years, a number of new “fringe” communities, Savvas Zannettou, Barry Bradlyn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Haewoon Kwak, like 4chan or certain subreddits, have gained traction on the Web Michael Sirivianos, Gianluca Stringhini, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2018. What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?. In WWW at a rapid pace. However, more often than not, little is known about ’18 Companion: The 2018 Web Conference Companion, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, how they evolve or what kind of activities they attract, despite France. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558. recent research has shown that they influence how false informa- 3191531 tion reaches mainstream communities. This motivates the need to monitor these communities and analyze their impact on the Web’s information ecosystem. 1 INTRODUCTION In August 2016, a new social network called Gab was created The Web’s information ecosystem is composed of multiple com- as an alternative to Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Muslim Advocacy Network
    1. The Australian Muslim Advocacy Network (AMAN) welcomes the opportunity to input to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Freedom of Religion or Belief as he prepares this report on the Impact of Islamophobia/anti-Muslim hatred and discrimination on the right to freedom of thought, conscience religion or belief. 2. We also welcome the opportunity to participate in your Asia-Pacific Consultation and hear from the experiences of a variety of other Muslims organisations. 3. AMAN is a national body that works through law, policy, research and media, to secure the physical and psychological welfare of Australian Muslims. 4. Our objective to create conditions for the safe exercise of our faith and preservation of faith- based identity, both of which are under persistent pressure from vilification, discrimination and disinformation. 5. We are engaged in policy development across hate crime & vilification laws, online safety, disinformation and democracy. Through using a combination of media, law, research, and direct engagement with decision making parties such as government and digital platforms, we are in a constant process of generating and testing constructive proposals. We also test existing civil and criminal laws to push back against the mainstreaming of hate, and examine whether those laws are fit for purpose. Most recently, we are finalising significant research into how anti-Muslim dehumanising discourse operates on Facebook and Twitter, and the assessment framework that could be used to competently and consistently assess hate actors. A. Definitions What is your working definition of anti-Muslim hatred and/or Islamophobia? What are the advantages and potential pitfalls of such definitions? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Official Visit of the OSCE PA
    AD HOC COMMITTEE ON COUNTERING TERRORISM OFFICIAL VISIT TO NORWAY 14-15 January 2020 NOTE-TO-THE-FILE Introduction On the 14th-15th of January 2020, the OSCE PA Ad Hoc Committee on Countering Terrorism (CCT) conducted an official visit to Norway. The 20-member delegation, which consisted of CCT members as well as representatives from the OSCE Transnational Threats Department and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean, was led by OSCE PA President George Tsereteli. The visit, initiated by CCT Chair Mr. Abid Q. Raja and organized by the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget), was also attended by OSCE PA Secretary General Roberto Montella. 1 After being welcomed by the President of the Norwegian Parliament, the delegation paid tribute to the victims of the 22nd July 2011 terror attacks in both Utøya Island and Oslo. During the two- day programme, the delegation also had the opportunity to meet with the Minister of Justice and the Minister of Climate and Environment, the Governing Mayor of Oslo, several members of the Labour Party and the Worker’s Youth League, as well as with representatives of the Norwegian Police Security Service, Norwegian Correctional System, the 22nd July Commission, the 22nd July Parliamentary Committee, the 22nd July Support Group and academia. Notably, many interlocutors had first-hand experience of the 22nd July 2011 tragic events. Ultimately, the visit provided an excellent opportunity to get familiar with the national counter terrorism system and learn more about Norway’s multifaceted response to the 22nd July attacks, which included legislative reform, emergency response preparedness, the prevention of terrorism and radicalization, and the role of public health services.
    [Show full text]
  • Link to Today's Pdf Package
    TRANSCENDENCE “Every Place at Once,” by Crystal Abidin “Remote Control,” by Linda Besner “Seeing Stars,” by Alex Ronan “Advanced Search,” by Franceska Rouzard As a kid bored on a car ride or a teen stoned in afternoon class I imagined zones of psychic communion, immaterial common rooms where everyone I knew lived a second life. These spaces are now mundane, although, if anything, the internet proves that mundanity is an illusion and that everything is shot through with magic, or whatever you want to call it. Online doesn’t feel new at all. It feels like the home version of a concept that used to be esoteric. Online is a layer of reality, a dimension of life. It doesn’t solve or replace any great mysteries, but it turns them under the light. If the spark of an individual is the part of you that decides, your self will outlast you online, as an artifact, or a program. You can leave it there. —Alexandra Molotkow TRANSCENDENCE EVERYEVERY PLACEPLACE ATAT ONCEONCE Where do the dead go when tangible, singing onscreen. by CRYSTAL ABIDIN There she is, my sister, in two places at once. they die? No one in the congregation seems to flinch. As neatly as they filed into the pews, am sitting at a memorial service in a church everyone stands up and sings along tutti. But snug in the east end of Singapore. The master it doesn’t take long for the white-lit screens of Iof ceremony goes up to the pulpit. He tells us smartphones to emerge from the sea of heads.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Crimes Among Somali-Americans: Convergences of Radicalization and Trafficking
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice to prepare the following resource: Document Title: Transnational Crimes among Somali- Americans: Convergences of Radicalization and Trafficking Author(s): Stevan Weine, Edna Erez, Chloe Polutnik Document Number: 252135 Date Received: May 2019 Award Number: 2013-ZA-BX-0008 This resource has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This resource is being made publically available through the Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Transnational Crimes among Somali-Americans: Convergences of Radicalization and Trafficking Stevan Weine, Edna Erez, and Chloe Polutnik 1 This resource was prepared by the author(s) using Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This project was supported by Award No. 2013-ZA-BX-0008, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice. 2 This resource was prepared by the author(s) using Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Nationalism and Ethnic Violence
    Russian Nationalism and Ethnic Violence Nationalism is now the dominant narrative in Russian politics, and one with genuine popularity in society. Russian Nationalism and Ethnic Violence: Symbolic violence, lynching, pogrom, and massacre is a theoretical and empirical study which seeks to break the concept of ‘ethnic violence’ into distinguishable types, examining the key question of why violence within the same conflict takes different forms at certain times and providing empirical insight into the politics of one of the most important countries in the world today. Theoretically, the work promises to bring the content of ethnic identity back into explanations of ethnic violence, with concepts from social theory, and empirical and qualitative analysis of databases, newspaper reports, human rights reports, social media, and ethnographic interviews. It sets out a new typology of ethnic violence, studied against examples of neo-Nazi attacks, Cossack violence against Meskhetian Turks, and Russian race riots. The study brings hate crimes in Russia into the study of ethnic violence and examines the social undercurrents that have led to Putin’s embrace of nationalism. It adds to the growing body of English language scholarship on Russia’s nationalist turn in the post-Cold War era, and will be essential read- ing for anyone seeking to understand not only why different forms of ethnic violence occur, but also the potential trajectory of Russian politics in the next 20 years. Richard Arnold is Associate Professor of Political Science at Muskingum University where he teaches comparative politics and international relations. He was the 2015 recipient of the William Rainey Harper award for Out- standing Scholarship and has published numerous articles in PS: Political Science and Politics, Theoretical Criminology, Post-Soviet Affairs, Problems of Post-Communism, Nationalities Papers, and Journal for the Study of Radic- alism.
    [Show full text]