DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Options and Regulatory Mechanisms for Managing Radicalization on the Internet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Options and Regulatory Mechanisms for Managing Radicalization on the Internet Policy options and regulatory mechanisms for managing radicalization on the Internet Paris, 30 September 2016 “[…] I firmly believe that in a free democratic society, freedom of speech and expression is one of the most prized freedoms which must be defended and upheld at any cost and this should be particularly so in the land of Voltaire. It is indeed unfortunate that in the world of today, when science and technology have advanced the frontiers of knowledge and mankind is beginning to realize that human happiness can be realized only through inter-dependence and cooperation, the threshold of tolerance should be going down. It is high time man should realize his spiritual dimension and replace bitterness and hatred by love and compassion, tolerance and forgiveness.” Justice Prafullachandra Bhagwati Dan Shefet (Individual Specialist) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank the following for their support, valuable advice and input throughout the drafting of the Report: Dr. Indrajit Banerjee and his team in UNESCO’s Knowledge Societies Division The UNESCO Delegates and Ministries of Justice/Interior of countries that have participated in the Country Survey. Alexander Linden, Honorary advisor to the French Supreme Court Janice Duffy, Researcher, Australia Pavan Duggal, Supreme Court Lawyer, India Tom Høyem, Former Minister in Denmark under Poul Schlüter Francesca Musiani, Researcher at the CNRS Institute for Communication Sciences and Member of the French National Assembly’s Commission on the Law and Rights in the Digital Era Sami Mahbouli, Lawyer at The Tunisian Supreme Court and Columnist Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, Former Minister of Justice under Angela Merkel Marc Randazza, First Amendment Attorney, United States Viswa Sadasivan, CEO of Strategic Moves (Consultancy agency in Singapore) and former member of the Singaporean Parliament Mr K. Shanmugam, Minister for Home Affairs and Minister for Law, Singapore Veronika Wand-Danielsson, Ambassador of Sweden to France Fareed Yasseen, Ambassador of Iraq to France David Wright, Director of UK Safer Internet Centre “Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defense of peace must be constructed” (UNESCO Constitution, 16 November 1945). Page 2 out of 140 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….……………4 Methodology The Internet and Radicalization - Brief History of Online Activism - The Internet’s Contribution to the Radicalization Process Section 1: The International Community’s Policy on Internet Radicalization……………….......12 Section 2: Definition of Radicalizing Content……………………………………………………….14 2.a. Definition as a Legal Requirement 2.b. Examples of Definitions Section 3: Freedom of speech: The challenge……………………………………………………….37 3.a. General Principles of Freedom of Speech 3.b. Internet and Freedom of Speech 3.c. Specific Restrictions of Freedom of Speech Section 4: Online Law Enforcement and Liability…………………………………………….……53 4.a. Can/should the Internet be regulated? 4.b. Jurisdiction and Extraterritoriality 4.c. Internet specific law/Media Law 4.d. Private Sector Enforcement and Liability 4.e. State Responsibility for Private Actors Section 5: Filtering, Blocking, Encryption and Counter-Narrative ………………...................….97 Section 6: Policy Recommendations …………………………………………………………….….104 Bibliography Annex 1: Country Questionnaire/Survey Annex 2: Statistics Page 3 out of 140 INTRODUCTION If we look back over the past 9 months preceding the date of this report (30 September 2016) there have been some 1320 terrorist attacks causing 11202 fatalities around the world.1 Awareness of the role of the Internet as a facilitator or catalyst of radicalization has grown over the years (as it will be seen from Section 1 on The International Community’s Policy on Internet Radicalization). Recently both the FBI and President Obama publicly expressed the view that the perpetrator of the attack on a club in Orlando on 16 June 2016 had been radicalized by the Internet2. Numerous initiatives have been taken to identify the roots and causes of radicalization and the elaboration of efficient legal as well as sociological, psychological, political and educational responses. The atrocious acts committed by different terrorist groups have led several countries to take drastic legal measures aimed at protecting the right to life as enshrined in the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, Art. 6.1 and other values supported by the international community. These measures may in some cases encroach upon correlative human rights and in particular freedom of speech, the right to information and the free practice of religion. The State of Emergency Decree in France is an example of such legislation which took effect on midnight 13 November 2015 immediately after the Bataclan Tragedy. The Decree ultimately led to a call for Constitutional change and the State of Emergency was extended till January 2017 after yet another terrorist attack in Nice on 14 July 2016.3 Almost all countries around the world have taken steps to fight radicalization In this Report we shall analyze the legal measures taken specifically against online radicalization adopted by 32 countries representing the six geographical regions of UNESCO. We shall also analyze international treaties, European directives and resolutions at a regional and international level in an attempt to identify grounds of a common understanding and a consensual approach to measures against online radicalization by the international community. At the international and regional level, the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the East African Community, the Organization of American States, the Association of South East Asian Nations, the African Union and the League of Arab States have passed resolutions and adopted treaties providing for harmonization of laws, the creation of new criminal offences and the establishment of rules governing jurisdiction and cooperation by way of information sharing and coordination of resources (Section 1). The Report seeks to address the following legal questions and challenges in particular: 1 According to Storymaps (2016). Available at: http://storymaps.esri.com/stories/2016/terrorist-attacks/ [Accessed 30 September 2016]. 2 Pilkington, E.; Roberts, D. (2016): “FBI and Obama confirm Omar Mateen was radicalized on the internet”, The Guardian. Available online at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/13/pulse-nightclub-attack-shooter-radicalized- internet-orlando [Accessed 30 September 2016]. 3 On 16 November 2015 president Francois Hollande initiated the first of 4 extensions of the State of Emergency. A bill to change the constitution for “The protection of the nation” was passed on 23 March 2016, but constitutional change has not yet been enacted. Source : http://www.liberation.fr/france/2015/11/16/francois-hollande-annonce-une-revision-de-la- constitution_1413859). Page 4 out of 140 The conditions under which legal regulation of content may be implemented while meeting international human rights standards and in particular those protecting freedom of speech, non-discrimination and the free practice of religion. We shall seek to define the perimeter within which it may be recognized under international law that “radicalizing content” is excluded from freedom of speech protection (Section 3). Section 3 is broken down into a subsection on “General Principles of Freedom of Speech” including the caveat covering abuse (Section 3.a), “Internet and Freedom of Speech” (Section 3.b) and “Specific Restrictions of Freedom of Speech” (Section 3.c). Any attempt to regulate content on the Internet or any other medium will face the challenge of the protection accorded to freedom of speech and freedom of information (the latter being a collective freedom rather than an individual freedom). It is critical to analyze to what extent restrictions of freedom of speech with regard to radicalizing content may be consistent with existing and broadly recognized limitations based on the general abuse caveat or specific content restriction mandates. A number of international instruments (on a regional and international level) as well as international case law and national legislation/case law based on Media Law, Advertising Law (tobacco, medicine etc.) Crime Prevention Law (child pornography, money laundering, gambling, terrorism), Intellectual Property and Defamation Law (non-exhaustive examples) all ultimately lead to restrictions of freedom of speech. These existing specific (and broadly accepted) limits to free speech will be analyzed in Section 3.c. In Section 2 we shall attempt to arrive at a viable, comprehensive and predictable definition of “Radicalizing Content”. The attempts to identify/formulate an efficient and appropriate definition will not be confined to the analysis of legal instruments and jurisprudence, but will also take into account academic definitions applied in sociological and psychological studies as well as the definitions proposed by specialized agencies and Non-Governmental Organizations (preceding the analysis, comparison and identification of the key features of the phenomenon of radicalization leading to a legal definition of “radicalizing content”, we shall however turn to the “International Community’s Policy on Online Radicalization” (Section 1)). Hereafter the Report will focus on the more practical aspects of monitoring and enforcement in Section 4: “Online Law Enforcement and Liability” which is divided into Section 4.a on the “Regulability
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    33_754935 bindex.qxp 11/7/05 10:09 PM Page 345 Index Applications Menu, 42–43, 68–71 • Symbols • Applixware Office package, 15 appointments, tracking, 210 * (asterisk), 249, 251 archives, packing and unpacking (tar), 20, \ (backslash), 248 337–338 - (dash), 94 arguments, command line, 247 . (dot), 92 asterisk (*), 249, 251 ! (exclamation point), 252–253 Asymmetric DSL (ADSL), 108–109 / (forward slash), 79, 81 attachments, e-mail, 154 > (greater-than sign), 249 audio CDs, playing, 221–223 - (hyphen), 95 authentication, 292 < (less-than sign), 249 automatic command completion, 250 . (period), 96 automatic login, 40, 318–319, 325 | (pipe), 248 ? (question mark), 251 " (quotation marks), 247 ; (semicolon), 248 • B • [] (square brackets), 252 backdoor, 292 .. (two dots or dot-dot), 92 background, desktop, 73–74, 75–76 backing up files, 20 backslash (\), 248 • A • base station, 129 bash (Bourne Again Shell) access point, wireless LAN, 129, 131 automatic command completion, 250 Adobe Portable Document Format. See PDF combining commands, 248 ADSL (Asymmetric DSL), 108–109 described, 47–48, 246 AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), 129 error messages, saving to file, 249–250 aggregator, RSS, 185 file, command input from, 249 AIM (America Online instant messaging output, saving to file, 249 service), 54, 161–162 repeating previously typed commands, Akregator news reader, 54, 185–186 252–253 amaroK music player, 224 syntax, 247–248 Apache Web server, 16 wildcards, 251–252 applets, 68, 75 bastion host, 293 application gateway, 292 bit bucket, 250 applications Blam RSS reader, 54 controlling, 18–19 block device, 94 development, 17 Bluetooth wireless, 20, 271 e-mail, 152–153 bookmark field, 200 GNOME Desktop, illustrated,COPYRIGHTED 64 boot menu MATERIAL items, installing, 27–28 GNU, 343 boot process, starting and stopping services, installing at setup, 32 263–264 KDE Desktop, illustrated, 64 booting, 26–27, 39–40 Linux packages, 11 Bourne Again Shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Cisco SCA BB Protocol Reference Guide
    Cisco Service Control Application for Broadband Protocol Reference Guide Protocol Pack #60 August 02, 2018 Cisco Systems, Inc. www.cisco.com Cisco has more than 200 offices worldwide. Addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers are listed on the Cisco website at www.cisco.com/go/offices. THE SPECIFICATIONS AND INFORMATION REGARDING THE PRODUCTS IN THIS MANUAL ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. ALL STATEMENTS, INFORMATION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS MANUAL ARE BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE BUT ARE PRESENTED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. USERS MUST TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR APPLICATION OF ANY PRODUCTS. THE SOFTWARE LICENSE AND LIMITED WARRANTY FOR THE ACCOMPANYING PRODUCT ARE SET FORTH IN THE INFORMATION PACKET THAT SHIPPED WITH THE PRODUCT AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SOFTWARE LICENSE OR LIMITED WARRANTY, CONTACT YOUR CISCO REPRESENTATIVE FOR A COPY. The Cisco implementation of TCP header compression is an adaptation of a program developed by the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) as part of UCB’s public domain version of the UNIX operating system. All rights reserved. Copyright © 1981, Regents of the University of California. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER WARRANTY HEREIN, ALL DOCUMENT FILES AND SOFTWARE OF THESE SUPPLIERS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” WITH ALL FAULTS. CISCO AND THE ABOVE-NAMED SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THOSE OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OR ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE, OR TRADE PRACTICE. IN NO EVENT SHALL CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS OR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO DATA ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THIS MANUAL, EVEN IF CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Muslim Advocacy Network
    1. The Australian Muslim Advocacy Network (AMAN) welcomes the opportunity to input to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Freedom of Religion or Belief as he prepares this report on the Impact of Islamophobia/anti-Muslim hatred and discrimination on the right to freedom of thought, conscience religion or belief. 2. We also welcome the opportunity to participate in your Asia-Pacific Consultation and hear from the experiences of a variety of other Muslims organisations. 3. AMAN is a national body that works through law, policy, research and media, to secure the physical and psychological welfare of Australian Muslims. 4. Our objective to create conditions for the safe exercise of our faith and preservation of faith- based identity, both of which are under persistent pressure from vilification, discrimination and disinformation. 5. We are engaged in policy development across hate crime & vilification laws, online safety, disinformation and democracy. Through using a combination of media, law, research, and direct engagement with decision making parties such as government and digital platforms, we are in a constant process of generating and testing constructive proposals. We also test existing civil and criminal laws to push back against the mainstreaming of hate, and examine whether those laws are fit for purpose. Most recently, we are finalising significant research into how anti-Muslim dehumanising discourse operates on Facebook and Twitter, and the assessment framework that could be used to competently and consistently assess hate actors. A. Definitions What is your working definition of anti-Muslim hatred and/or Islamophobia? What are the advantages and potential pitfalls of such definitions? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiretapping End-To-End Encrypted Voip Calls Real-World Attacks on ZRTP
    Institute of Operating Systems and Computer Networks Wiretapping End-to-End Encrypted VoIP Calls Real-World Attacks on ZRTP Dominik Schürmann, Fabian Kabus, Gregor Hildermeier, Lars Wolf, 2017-07-18 wiretapping difficulty End-to-End Encryption SIP + DTLS-SRTP (SIP + Datagram Transport Layer Security-SRTP) End-to-End Encryption & Authentication SIP + SRTP + ZRTP Introduction Man-in-the-Middle ZRTP Attacks Conclusion End-to-End Security for Voice Calls Institute of Operating Systems and Computer Networks No End-to-End Security PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) SIP + (S)RTP (Session Initiation Protocol + Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol) 2017-07-18 Dominik Schürmann Wiretapping End-to-End Encrypted VoIP Calls Page 2 of 13 wiretapping difficulty End-to-End Encryption & Authentication SIP + SRTP + ZRTP Introduction Man-in-the-Middle ZRTP Attacks Conclusion End-to-End Security for Voice Calls Institute of Operating Systems and Computer Networks No End-to-End Security PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) SIP + (S)RTP (Session Initiation Protocol + Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol) End-to-End Encryption SIP + DTLS-SRTP (SIP + Datagram Transport Layer Security-SRTP) 2017-07-18 Dominik Schürmann Wiretapping End-to-End Encrypted VoIP Calls Page 2 of 13 wiretapping difficulty Introduction Man-in-the-Middle ZRTP Attacks Conclusion End-to-End Security for Voice Calls Institute of Operating Systems and Computer Networks No End-to-End Security PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) SIP + (S)RTP (Session Initiation Protocol + Secure Real-Time
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Official Visit of the OSCE PA
    AD HOC COMMITTEE ON COUNTERING TERRORISM OFFICIAL VISIT TO NORWAY 14-15 January 2020 NOTE-TO-THE-FILE Introduction On the 14th-15th of January 2020, the OSCE PA Ad Hoc Committee on Countering Terrorism (CCT) conducted an official visit to Norway. The 20-member delegation, which consisted of CCT members as well as representatives from the OSCE Transnational Threats Department and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean, was led by OSCE PA President George Tsereteli. The visit, initiated by CCT Chair Mr. Abid Q. Raja and organized by the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget), was also attended by OSCE PA Secretary General Roberto Montella. 1 After being welcomed by the President of the Norwegian Parliament, the delegation paid tribute to the victims of the 22nd July 2011 terror attacks in both Utøya Island and Oslo. During the two- day programme, the delegation also had the opportunity to meet with the Minister of Justice and the Minister of Climate and Environment, the Governing Mayor of Oslo, several members of the Labour Party and the Worker’s Youth League, as well as with representatives of the Norwegian Police Security Service, Norwegian Correctional System, the 22nd July Commission, the 22nd July Parliamentary Committee, the 22nd July Support Group and academia. Notably, many interlocutors had first-hand experience of the 22nd July 2011 tragic events. Ultimately, the visit provided an excellent opportunity to get familiar with the national counter terrorism system and learn more about Norway’s multifaceted response to the 22nd July attacks, which included legislative reform, emergency response preparedness, the prevention of terrorism and radicalization, and the role of public health services.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Crimes Among Somali-Americans: Convergences of Radicalization and Trafficking
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice to prepare the following resource: Document Title: Transnational Crimes among Somali- Americans: Convergences of Radicalization and Trafficking Author(s): Stevan Weine, Edna Erez, Chloe Polutnik Document Number: 252135 Date Received: May 2019 Award Number: 2013-ZA-BX-0008 This resource has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This resource is being made publically available through the Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Transnational Crimes among Somali-Americans: Convergences of Radicalization and Trafficking Stevan Weine, Edna Erez, and Chloe Polutnik 1 This resource was prepared by the author(s) using Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This project was supported by Award No. 2013-ZA-BX-0008, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice. 2 This resource was prepared by the author(s) using Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Termination Rates at European Level January 2021
    BoR (21) 71 Termination rates at European level January 2021 10 June 2021 BoR (21) 71 Table of contents 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 2 2. Fixed networks – voice interconnection ..................................................................... 6 2.1. Assumptions made for the benchmarking ................................................................ 6 2.2. FTR benchmark .......................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Short term evolution of fixed incumbents’ FTRs (from July 2020 to January 2021) ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4. FTR regulatory model implemented and symmetry overview ............................... 12 2.5. Number of lines and market shares ........................................................................ 13 3. Mobile networks – voice interconnection ................................................................. 14 3.1. Assumptions made for the benchmarking .............................................................. 14 3.2. Average MTR per country: rates per voice minute (as of January 2021) ............ 15 3.3. Average MTR per operator ...................................................................................... 18 3.4. Average MTR: Time series of simple average and weighted average at European level .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’S Radicalization and Attack Planning
    The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam i The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam ICCT Perspective December 2020 ii About ICCT The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague (ICCT) is an independent think and do tank providing multidisciplinary policy advice and practical, solution- oriented implementation support on prevention and the rule of law, two vital pillars of effective counterterrorism. ICCT’s work focuses on themes at the intersection of countering violent extremism and criminal justice sector responses, as well as human rights-related aspects of counterterrorism. The major project areas concern countering violent extremism, rule of law, foreign fighters, country and regional analysis, rehabilitation, civil society engagement and victims’ voices. Functioning as a nucleus within the international counter-terrorism network, ICCT connects experts, policymakers, civil society actors and practitioners from different fields by providing a platform for productive collaboration, practical analysis, and exchange of experiences and expertise, with the ultimate aim of identifying innovative and comprehensive approaches to preventing and countering terrorism. Licensing and Distribution ICCT publications are published in open access format and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Years of Copyright Enforcement by Private Third Parties IDP
    IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política E-ISSN: 1699-8154 [email protected] Universitat Oberta de Catalunya España Wesselingh, Ellen Marja Website Blocking: Evolution or Revolution? 10 Years of Copyright Enforcement by Private Third Parties IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, núm. 19, octubre, 2014, pp. 35-47 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Barcelona, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=78835370004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Universitat Oberta de Catalunya www.uoc.edu/idp ARTICLE Website Blocking: Evolution or Revolution? 10 Years of Copyright Enforcement by Private Third Parties* Ellen Marja Wesselingh The Hague University of Applied Sciences Published: October, 2014 Abstract Copyright enforcement by private third parties – does it work uniformly across the EU? Since the inception of Napster, home copying of digital files has taken flight. The first providers of software or infrastructure for the illegal exchange of files were held contributory or vicariously liable for copyright infringement. In response, they quickly diluted the chain of liability to such an extent that neither the software producers, nor the service providers could be held liable. Moving further down the communication chain, the rights holders are now requiring Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that provide access to end customers to help them with the enforcement of their rights. This article discusses case law regarding the enforcement of copyright by Internet Access Providers throughout Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Telephony with Linphone WELLWELL CONNECTEDCONNECTED
    Linphone COVER STORY Internet telephony with Linphone WELLWELL CONNECTEDCONNECTED When you want to call your friends in distant countries, don’t pick up municate with the VoIP provider, so you will need to install the library first. To do the phone; just put on your headset and fire up Linphone. so, open a terminal window, then be- come root by typing su and supplying BY SIMONE SCHÄFER the root password. Unpack the archive by typing tar xzf libosip2-2.2.0.tar.gz, ne of the most popular methods wants to take incoming calls via Purtel. and then change to the new directory (cd for accessing Voice over IP tech- The procedures are similar for other pro- libosip2-2.2.0). The following commands Onology is through a so-called viders. will build and install the library: softphone. A softphone is simply a com- puter program running on your desktop Installation ./configure --prefix=/usr that handles call establishment and com- The source code for the 1.1.0 release, make munication. Linphone [1] is one of the and the libraries, are available on the most popular softphone applications for DVD with this issue below LinuxUser/ Phone Numbers and SIP Ids Linux. Linphone is optimized for the linphone/. In the simplest of all cases, the phone Gnome desktop, although that doesn’t Mandriva Linux 2006 has the current number will be a simple telephone num- mean you can’t run it on KDE. This arti- 1.1.0 version. Gentoo Linux users can ber followed by the SIP domain, such as cles describes how to install, configure, install Linphone 1.1.0 simply by running [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Security & Privacy for Mobile Phones
    Security & Privacy FOR Mobile Phones Carybé, Lucas Helfstein July 4, 2017 Instituto DE Matemática E Estatística - USP What IS security? • That GRANTS THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE THE ASSURANCES above; • That ENSURES THAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THIS SYSTEM KNOWS EACH other; • That TRIES TO KEEP THE ABOVE PROMISES forever. Security IS ... A System! • That ASSURES YOU THE INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF AN INFORMATION AS WELL AS ITS authors; 1 • That ENSURES THAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THIS SYSTEM KNOWS EACH other; • That TRIES TO KEEP THE ABOVE PROMISES forever. Security IS ... A System! • That ASSURES YOU THE INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF AN INFORMATION AS WELL AS ITS authors; • That GRANTS THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE THE ASSURANCES above; 1 • That TRIES TO KEEP THE ABOVE PROMISES forever. Security IS ... A System! • That ASSURES YOU THE INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF AN INFORMATION AS WELL AS ITS authors; • That GRANTS THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE THE ASSURANCES above; • That ENSURES THAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THIS SYSTEM KNOWS EACH other; 1 Security IS ... A System! • That ASSURES YOU THE INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF AN INFORMATION AS WELL AS ITS authors; • That GRANTS THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE THE ASSURANCES above; • That ENSURES THAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THIS SYSTEM KNOWS EACH other; • That TRIES TO KEEP THE ABOVE PROMISES forever. 1 Security IS ... A System! Eve | | | Alice "Hi" <---------------> "Hi" Bob 2 Security IS ... Cryptography! Eve | | | Alice "Hi" <----"*****"------> "Hi" Bob 3 Security IS ... Impossible! The ONLY TRULY SECURE SYSTEM IS ONE THAT IS POWERED off, CAST IN A BLOCK OF CONCRETE AND SEALED IN A lead-lined ROOM WITH ARMED GUARDS - AND EVEN THEN I HAVE MY doubts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Terrorism Best Practices Analysis
    Funded by the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme CyberROAD Development of the Cybercrime and Cyber-terrorism Research Roadmap Grant Agreement N. 607642 D 6.3 – Cyber Terrorism Best Practices Analysis Date of deliverable: 30/09/2015 Actual submission date: 30/09/2015 Start date of the Project: 1st June 2014 Duration: 24 months Coordinator: UNICA – University of Cagliari, PRA Lab - Pattern Recognition and Applications Lab Version: 2.2 Project funded by the European Commission Directorate-General Home Affairs in the Prevention of and Fight against Crime Programme Restriction Level PU Public No PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission services) No RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission services) No CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission) Yes D6.2 Cyber Terrorism - Preliminary Best Practices Analysis Funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme Page 1 of 23 Revision history Version Object Date Author(s) 0.1 Creation 05/03/2015 INOV, PJ 1.0 Revision 1 13/03/2015 INOV, PJ 1.1 Revision 2 18/03/2015 INOV, PJ, INDRA 2.0 Revision 3 17/09/2015 INOV, MELANI, FORTH, CYBERDEFCON 2.1 Revision 4 24/09/2015 INOV, HMoD 2.2 Final 30/09/2015 INOV D6.2 Cyber Terrorism - Preliminary Best Practices Analysis Funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme Page 2 of 23 D6.3 Cyber Terrorism - Best Practices Analysis Responsible INOV Contributors PJ INDRA FORTH-ICS CYBERDEFCON HMoD MELANI Summary: Focused on cyber terrorism, this deliverable was divided into two releases: a preliminary best practices analysis (D6.2) and a final best practices analysis document (D6.3).
    [Show full text]